Minor: fix wrong function call

[Weijun-H]

Which issue does this PR close?

Closes #.

Rationale for this change

This issue is called #8744 , but I am curious why it passed the ci 🤔

What changes are included in this PR?

Are these changes tested?

Are there any user-facing changes?

[alamb]

This seems like it is an oversight in our CI -- is it possible to write a test that would fail without this code change 🤔

Nice catch

[Weijun-H]

This seems like it is an oversight in our CI -- is it possible to write a test that would fail without this code change 🤔

Nice catch

The problem may not related to ci, because I tested it on cli, and it also worked. @alamb

❯ select array_resize([1,2],5);
+------------------------------------------------------+
| array_resize(make_array(Int64(1),Int64(2)),Int64(5)) |
+------------------------------------------------------+
| [1, 2, , , ] |
+------------------------------------------------------+
1 row in set. Query took 0.009 seconds.

[comphead]

lgtm thanks @Weijun-H

[alamb]

The problem may not related to ci, because I tested it on cli, and it also worked. @alamb

Right, sorry, what I was saying is that given there is a bug you found in the code (by manual inspection) but

1. it wasn't found by tests
2. you didn't have to update any tests when you changed the code

I conclude there is a gap in our test coverage. Thus I was suggesting we find a way to write a test that would fail prior to this code change, but will pass with the change

[Weijun-H]

The additional tests is in #8868@alamb

[alamb]

Thanks again @Weijun-H