Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
[local exchange](fix) Fix correctness caused by local exchange - #41555
Conversation
doris-robot
commented
Oct 8, 2024
Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris. Since 2024-03-18, the Document has been moved to doris-website. |
Gabriel39
commented
Oct 8, 2024
run buildall |
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
doris-robot
commented
Oct 8, 2024
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 40984 ms |
doris-robot
commented
Oct 8, 2024
TeamCity be ut coverage result: |
doris-robot
commented
Oct 8, 2024
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 192084 ms |
doris-robot
commented
Oct 8, 2024
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 33.14 s |
Gabriel39
commented
Oct 8, 2024
run buildall |
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
doris-robot
commented
Oct 8, 2024
TeamCity be ut coverage result: |
doris-robot
commented
Oct 8, 2024
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 40822 ms |
doris-robot
commented
Oct 8, 2024
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 192210 ms |
doris-robot
commented
Oct 8, 2024
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 33.34 s |
PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested. |
PR approved by anyone and no changes requested. |
…e#41555) For plan `local exchange (hash shuffle) -> union -> colocated agg`, we must ensure local exchange use the same hash algorithm as MPP shuffling. This problem is covered by our test cases but only can be reproduced on multiple BEs so no case is added in this PR.
…e#41555) For plan `local exchange (hash shuffle) -> union -> colocated agg`, we must ensure local exchange use the same hash algorithm as MPP shuffling. This problem is covered by our test cases but only can be reproduced on multiple BEs so no case is added in this PR.
…e#41555) For plan `local exchange (hash shuffle) -> union -> colocated agg`, we must ensure local exchange use the same hash algorithm as MPP shuffling. This problem is covered by our test cases but only can be reproduced on multiple BEs so no case is added in this PR.
…e#41555) For plan `local exchange (hash shuffle) -> union -> colocated agg`, we must ensure local exchange use the same hash algorithm as MPP shuffling. This problem is covered by our test cases but only can be reproduced on multiple BEs so no case is added in this PR.
…e#41555) For plan `local exchange (hash shuffle) -> union -> colocated agg`, we must ensure local exchange use the same hash algorithm as MPP shuffling. This problem is covered by our test cases but only can be reproduced on multiple BEs so no case is added in this PR.
…e#41555) For plan `local exchange (hash shuffle) -> union -> colocated agg`, we must ensure local exchange use the same hash algorithm as MPP shuffling. This problem is covered by our test cases but only can be reproduced on multiple BEs so no case is added in this PR.
…e#41555) For plan `local exchange (hash shuffle) -> union -> colocated agg`, we must ensure local exchange use the same hash algorithm as MPP shuffling. This problem is covered by our test cases but only can be reproduced on multiple BEs so no case is added in this PR.
…e#41555) For plan `local exchange (hash shuffle) -> union -> colocated agg`, we must ensure local exchange use the same hash algorithm as MPP shuffling. This problem is covered by our test cases but only can be reproduced on multiple BEs so no case is added in this PR.
Proposed changes
For plan
local exchange (hash shuffle) -> union -> colocated agg, we must ensure local exchange use the same hash algorithm as MPP shuffling.This problem is covered by our test cases but only can be reproduced on multiple BEs so no case is added in this PR.