Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
[chore](cloud) Change range iterator check pattern from do...while() to while() to get better robustness - #59019
Merged
Conversation
hello-stephen
commented
Dec 14, 2025
Contributor
Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris. Please clearly describe your PR:
|
gavinchou
commented
Dec 14, 2025
ContributorAuthor
run buildall |
gavinchou
commented
Dec 14, 2025
ContributorAuthor
run cloud_ut |
w41ter
previously approved these changes
Dec 15, 2025
Contributor
PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested. |
Contributor
PR approved by anyone and no changes requested. |
gavinchou
commented
Dec 18, 2025
ContributorAuthor
run buildall |
gavinchou
marked this pull request as draft
December 25, 2025 12:43
w41ter pushed a commit
to w41ter/incubator-doris
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 26, 2025
…apache#59020 (apache#6203) fix first txn->get ends up with null pointer partial pick apache#59019
seawinde pushed a commit
to seawinde/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 30, 2026
…>get() failed apache#59019 (apache#59020) fix first txn->get ends up with null pointer partial pick apache#59019
gavinchou
marked this pull request as ready for review
March 27, 2026 13:24
gavinchou
commented
Mar 27, 2026
ContributorAuthor
run buildall |
…o while() to get better robustness The original implementation of do...while() check is not extensible for retry if we failed to do the first `txn->get()` in the while loop. It will end with referencing null pointer at the check `while (it->more())`
…o while() to get better robustness The original implementation of do...while() check is not extensible for retry if we failed to do the first `txn->get()` in the while loop. It will end with referencing null pointer at the check `while (it->more())`
gavinchouforce-pushed
the
gavin-fix-cloud-while-more
branch
from
April 4, 2026 09:40
67f42b1 to
ce72e2dComparegavinchou
commented
Apr 4, 2026
ContributorAuthor
run buildall |
gavinchou
commented
Apr 7, 2026
ContributorAuthor
run buildall |
Yukang-Lian
approved these changes
Apr 7, 2026
w41ter
approved these changes
Apr 8, 2026
Contributor
PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
github-actionsBot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 8, 2026
…to while() to get better robustness (#59019) The original implementation of do...while() check is not extensible for retry if we failed to do the first `txn->get()` in the while loop. It will end with referencing null pointer at the check `while (it->more())`, and the original pattern is easily misused/copied in a scenario needs retry. No need to add new tests, the changes are covered by existing tests.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The original implementation of do...while() check is not extensible for retry if we failed to do the first
txn->get()in the while loop. It will end with referencing null pointer at the checkwhile (it->more()), and the original pattern is easily misused/copied in a scenario needs retry.No need to add new tests, the changes are covered by existing tests.