Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
HBASE-25292 [branch-2.4] Improve InetSocketAddress usage discipline - #5515
Conversation
Apache-HBase
commented
Nov 12, 2023
💔 -1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
Apache-HBase
commented
Nov 12, 2023
🎊 +1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
lfrancke
commented
Nov 12, 2023
Thank you. This is looking good to me but since I was involved in creating this patch I'll give @apurtell (or others) a chance to take a look as well. Thank you @sbernauer! |
Apache-HBase
commented
Nov 12, 2023
🎊 +1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
Apache-HBase
commented
Nov 12, 2023
🎊 +1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
Apache-HBase
commented
Nov 12, 2023
🎊 +1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
Apache-HBase
commented
Nov 12, 2023
🎊 +1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
Co-authored-by: Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org> (cherry picked from commit f813479)
Apache-HBase
commented
Nov 13, 2023
🎊 +1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
Apache-HBase
commented
Nov 13, 2023
🎊 +1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
Apache-HBase
commented
Nov 13, 2023
🎊 +1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
Apache9
commented
Nov 21, 2023
@sbernauer Thanks for opening this PR. So you guys needs this on branch-2.4? The patch here removes a configuration, so typically we do not want to include it in a patch release. And looking at the discussion on #2669 , there are also some other follow on tasks need to be done before making a release. Thanks. |
Yep, we find that without it, running 2.4.x on Kubernetes is very unstable across restarts because of DNS issues. We're also happy to just maintain the patch on our end for the rest of the lifecycle of 2.4 but thought others might benefit from this. Indeed, it removes a config and at least I didn't think about that when we put this PR up. Which other follow on tasks are you referring to? But as I mentioned: We can also close this PR if you're opposed to the change, we don't have very strong feelings about it. And thanks for taking a look! |
Apache9
commented
Nov 21, 2023
See HBASE-25335. I think at least we should also backport HBASE-25336? |
lfrancke
commented
Nov 21, 2023
Ah! Yes, sorry. We have a patch for that as well and can put up a PR as well. Only makes sense if we agree that this one should go in though I believe. They might even depend on each other, I haven't checked now. |
Apache9
commented
Nov 24, 2023
I'm OK with backporting all these issues to 2.4. |
lfrancke
commented
Nov 24, 2023
Thank you! I'll merge it then and we'll get the second PR up as well. |
sbernauer
commented
Nov 24, 2023
Thanks a lot for the quick review! |
sbernauer
commented
Nov 24, 2023
Created #5537 as a follow-up |
…pache#5515) Co-authored-by: Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org> (cherry picked from commit f813479) (cherry picked from commit 8707793) Change-Id: Idef951d038f8bda6e74d57d2894323322cae3e86
Back-port of #2669 to the 2.4 release line.
(cherry picked from commit f813479)
Co-authored-by: Andrew Purtell apurtell@apache.org