HBASE-28389 HBase backup yarn queue parameter ignored

[2005hithlj]

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28389

[Apache-HBase]

🎊 +1 overall

Vote	Subsystem	Runtime	Logfile	Comment
+0 🆗	reexec	0m 15s		Docker mode activated.
			_ Prechecks _
+1 💚	dupname	0m 0s		No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗	codespell	0m 0s		codespell was not available.
+0 🆗	detsecrets	0m 0s		detect-secrets was not available.
+1 💚	@author	0m 0s		The patch does not contain any @author tags.
+1 💚	hbaseanti	0m 0s		Patch does not have any anti-patterns.
			_ master Compile Tests _
+1 💚	mvninstall	3m 4s		master passed
+1 💚	compile	0m 32s		master passed
+1 💚	checkstyle	0m 12s		master passed
+1 💚	spotbugs	0m 33s		master passed
+1 💚	spotless	0m 45s		branch has no errors when running spotless:check.
			_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚	mvninstall	2m 54s		the patch passed
+1 💚	compile	0m 30s		the patch passed
+1 💚	javac	0m 30s		the patch passed
+1 💚	blanks	0m 0s		The patch has no blanks issues.
+1 💚	checkstyle	0m 11s		the patch passed
+1 💚	spotbugs	0m 37s		the patch passed
+1 💚	hadoopcheck	10m 31s		Patch does not cause any errors with Hadoop 3.3.6 3.4.0.
+1 💚	spotless	0m 44s		patch has no errors when running spotless:check.
			_ Other Tests _
+1 💚	asflicense	0m 11s		The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
		27m 25s

Subsystem	Report/Notes
Docker	ClientAPI=1.46 ServerAPI=1.46 base: https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-6131/1/artifact/yetus-general-check/output/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR	#6131
Optional Tests	dupname asflicense javac spotbugs checkstyle codespell detsecrets compile hadoopcheck hbaseanti spotless
uname	Linux 84b5b1f1b9b9 5.4.0-182-generic #202-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 26 12:29:36 UTC 2024 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool	maven
Personality	dev-support/hbase-personality.sh
git revision	master / e0ebb9f
Default Java	Eclipse Adoptium-17.0.11+9
Max. process+thread count	82 (vs. ulimit of 30000)
modules	C: hbase-backup U: hbase-backup
Console output	https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-6131/1/console
versions	git=2.34.1 maven=3.9.8 spotbugs=4.7.3
Powered by	Apache Yetus 0.15.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

[Apache-HBase]

🎊 +1 overall

Vote	Subsystem	Runtime	Logfile	Comment
+0 🆗	reexec	0m 38s		Docker mode activated.
-0 ⚠️	yetus	0m 3s		Unprocessed flag(s): --brief-report-file --spotbugs-strict-precheck --author-ignore-list --blanks-eol-ignore-file --blanks-tabs-ignore-file --quick-hadoopcheck
			_ Prechecks _
			_ master Compile Tests _
+1 💚	mvninstall	3m 6s		master passed
+1 💚	compile	0m 21s		master passed
+1 💚	javadoc	0m 16s		master passed
+1 💚	shadedjars	5m 23s		branch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.
			_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚	mvninstall	2m 57s		the patch passed
+1 💚	compile	0m 21s		the patch passed
+1 💚	javac	0m 21s		the patch passed
+1 💚	javadoc	0m 15s		the patch passed
+1 💚	shadedjars	5m 22s		patch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.
			_ Other Tests _
+1 💚	unit	11m 5s		hbase-backup in the patch passed.
		30m 48s

Subsystem	Report/Notes
Docker	ClientAPI=1.46 ServerAPI=1.46 base: https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-6131/1/artifact/yetus-jdk17-hadoop3-check/output/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR	#6131
Optional Tests	javac javadoc unit compile shadedjars
uname	Linux c074a040592e 5.4.0-177-generic #197-Ubuntu SMP Thu Mar 28 22:45:47 UTC 2024 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool	maven
Personality	dev-support/hbase-personality.sh
git revision	master / e0ebb9f
Default Java	Eclipse Adoptium-17.0.11+9
Test Results	https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-6131/1/testReport/
Max. process+thread count	3455 (vs. ulimit of 30000)
modules	C: hbase-backup U: hbase-backup
Console output	https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-6131/1/console
versions	git=2.34.1 maven=3.9.8
Powered by	Apache Yetus 0.15.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

[2005hithlj]

This PR for branch master and branch-3.
@DieterDP-ng@Apache9 Could you take a look? Thanks.

[NihalJain]

Also could you please share how this PR was tested and which all commands were covered? I am not sure if writing a UT would be straightforward, if possible that would be great!

[2005hithlj]

@NihalJain Thanks for your review. @DieterDP-ng has verified "Setting the queue through the configuration does work.", and the changes here is also simple and clear. Besides, the UT for this part is not easy to implement. Could you give me some suggestions?