Skip to content

RATIS-1882. Support read-after-write consistency - #913

Merged
szetszwo merged 5 commits into
apache:masterfrom
SzyWilliam:jira1882
Sep 5, 2023
Merged

RATIS-1882. Support read-after-write consistency#913
szetszwo merged 5 commits into
apache:masterfrom
SzyWilliam:jira1882

Conversation

@SzyWilliam

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Support read-after-write consistency.
Thanks @szetszwo very much for the patch. Only made minor changes and added unit tests to the patch.

What is the link to the Apache JIRA

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-1882

How was this patch tested?

New unit tests.

@szetszwoszetszwo left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 the change looks good. Just a very minor comment inlined.

Also, spent some time to add another unit test; see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/13062665/TestReadAfterWrite.patch
Could you include it?

Comment on lines +62 to +65
final CompletableFuture<Long> future = ref != null? ref.get(): null;
if (future != null) {
return future;
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just found that these few lines can be simplified as below.

if (ref != null) {
returnref.get();
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done


@Override
public CompletableFuture<RaftClientReply> sendReadAfterWrite(Message message) {
return send(RaftClientRequest.readAfterWriteConsistentRequestType(), message, null);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@SzyWilliam , Should sendReadAfterWrite use UnorderedAsync.send(..)? Indeed, all the linearizable reads should use UnorderedAsync.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's true! Thanks for pointing out, I'll change all the linearizable reads to use UnorderedAsync

@SzyWilliam

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@szetszwo Thanks very much for the patch! It's good to know CodeInjectionForTesting can be used for blocking. I'll try using Injection to replace the sleep time in the linearizable read index tests.

@szetszwoszetszwo left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's use OrderedAsync due to the test failure. Could you also include the following?

diff --gita/ratis-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ratis/protocol/RaftClientRequest.javab/ratis-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ratis/protocol/RaftClientRequest.javaindex4b0c5166..220694ce100644
--- a/ratis-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ratis/protocol/RaftClientRequest.java
+++ b/ratis-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ratis/protocol/RaftClientRequest.java@@ -227,7 +227,10@@publicclassRaftClientRequestextendsRaftClientMessage {
caseMESSAGESTREAM:
returntoString(getMessageStream());
caseREAD:
- return"RO";
+ finalReadRequestTypeProtoread = getRead();
+ returnread.getReadAfterWriteConsistent()? "RaW"
+ : read.getPreferNonLinearizable()? "RO(pNL)"
+ : "RO";
caseSTALEREAD:
return"StaleRead(" + getStaleRead().getMinIndex() + ")";
caseWATCH:
diff --gita/ratis-examples/src/test/java/org/apache/ratis/server/impl/TestReadAfterWrite.javab/ratis-examples/src/test/java/org/apache/ratis/server/impl/TestReadAfterWrite.javaindexf8f2405c..f515628c100644
--- a/ratis-examples/src/test/java/org/apache/ratis/server/impl/TestReadAfterWrite.java
+++ b/ratis-examples/src/test/java/org/apache/ratis/server/impl/TestReadAfterWrite.java@@ -128,8 +128,10@@publicclassTestReadAfterWriteLOG.info("readAfterWrite.get");
try {
// readAfterWrite should time out
- readAfterWrite.get(100, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
- Assert.fail();
+ finalRaftClientReplyreply = readAfterWrite.get(100, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
+ finalDoubleValueresult = (DoubleValue) Expression.Utils.bytes2Expression(
+ reply.getMessage().getContent().toByteArray(), 0);
+ Assert.fail("result=" + result + ", reply=" + reply);
} catch (TimeoutExceptione) {
LOG.info("Good", e);
}

@Override
public CompletableFuture<RaftClientReply> sendReadAfterWrite(Message message) {
return send(RaftClientRequest.readAfterWriteConsistentRequestType(), message, null);
return UnorderedAsync.send(RaftClientRequest.readAfterWriteConsistentRequestType(), message, null, client);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, it actually not working since UnorderedAsync use a different channel. It can arrive the server earlier than the previous write request and get a small readIndex. TestReadAfterWrite will fail.

  • Using unordered async
2023-09-04 11:16:59,888 DEBUG server.RaftServer$Division (LeaderStateImpl.java:getReadIndex(1099)) - readIndex=1, readAfterWriteConsistentIndex=1
  • Using ordered async
2023-09-04 11:11:36,917 DEBUG server.RaftServer$Division (LeaderStateImpl.java:getReadIndex(1099)) - readIndex=3, readAfterWriteConsistentIndex=3

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You are right. Just investigated on OrderedAsync and UnorderedAsync and now I know why we should choose OrderedAsync. Thanks very much for your time spent and the detailed explanation!

@szetszwo
szetszwo merged commit 88405b0 into apache:masterSep 5, 2023
Brokenice0415 pushed a commit to Brokenice0415/ratis that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2023
@tisonkun

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Cool! I'm checking this out.

@tisonkun

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

May I ask what is the target release version of this feature?

@szetszwo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We should include this to both 3.0.0 and the next branch 2 releases.

symious pushed a commit to symious/ratis that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2024
RexXiong pushed a commit to apache/celeborn that referenced this pull request May 30, 2024
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Bump Ratis version from 2.5.1 to 3.0.1. Address incompatible changes:
- RATIS-589. Eliminate buffer copying in SegmentedRaftLogOutputStream.(apache/ratis#964)
- RATIS-1677. Do not auto format RaftStorage in RECOVER.(apache/ratis#718)
- RATIS-1710. Refactor metrics api and implementation to separated modules. (apache/ratis#749)
### Why are the changes needed?
Bump Ratis version from 2.5.1 to 3.0.1. Ratis has released v3.0.0, v3.0.1, which release note refers to [3.0.0](https://ratis.apache.org/post/3.0.0.html), [3.0.1](https://ratis.apache.org/post/3.0.1.html). The 3.0.x version include new features like pluggable metrics and lease read, etc, some improvements and bugfixes including:
- 3.0.0: Change list of ratis 3.0.0 In total, there are roughly 100 commits diffing from 2.5.1 including:
- Incompatible Changes
- RaftStorage Auto-Format
- RATIS-1677. Do not auto format RaftStorage in RECOVER. (apache/ratis#718)
- RATIS-1694. Fix the compatibility issue of RATIS-1677. (apache/ratis#731)
- RATIS-1871. Auto format RaftStorage when there is only one directory configured. (apache/ratis#903)
- Pluggable Ratis-Metrics (RATIS-1688)
- RATIS-1689. Remove the use of the thirdparty Gauge. (apache/ratis#728)
- RATIS-1692. Remove the use of the thirdparty Counter. (apache/ratis#732)
- RATIS-1693. Remove the use of the thirdparty Timer. (apache/ratis#734)
- RATIS-1703. Move MetricsReporting and JvmMetrics to impl. (apache/ratis#741)
- RATIS-1704. Fix SuppressWarnings(“VisibilityModifier”) in RatisMetrics. (apache/ratis#742)
- RATIS-1710. Refactor metrics api and implementation to separated modules. (apache/ratis#749)
- RATIS-1712. Add a dropwizard 3 implementation of ratis-metrics-api. (apache/ratis#751)
- RATIS-1391. Update library dropwizard.metrics version to 4.x (apache/ratis#632)
- RATIS-1601. Use the shaded dropwizard metrics and remove the dependency (apache/ratis#671)
- Streaming Protocol Change
- RATIS-1569. Move the asyncRpcApi.sendForward(..) call to the client side. (apache/ratis#635)
- New Features
- Leader Lease (RATIS-1864)
- RATIS-1865. Add leader lease bound ratio configuration (apache/ratis#897)
- RATIS-1866. Maintain leader lease after AppendEntries (apache/ratis#898)
- RATIS-1894. Implement ReadOnly based on leader lease (apache/ratis#925)
- RATIS-1882. Support read-after-write consistency (apache/ratis#913)
- StateMachine API
- RATIS-1874. Add notifyLeaderReady function in IStateMachine (apache/ratis#906)
- RATIS-1897. Make TransactionContext available in DataApi.write(..). (apache/ratis#930)
- New Configuration Properties
- RATIS-1862. Add the parameter whether to take Snapshot when stopping to adapt to different services (apache/ratis#896)
- RATIS-1930. Add a conf for enable/disable majority-add. (apache/ratis#961)
- RATIS-1918. Introduces parameters that separately control the shutdown of RaftServerProxy by JVMPauseMonitor. (apache/ratis#950)
- RATIS-1636. Support re-config ratis properties (apache/ratis#800)
- RATIS-1860. Add ratis-shell cmd to generate a new raft-meta.conf. (apache/ratis#901)
- Improvements & Bug Fixes
- Netty
- RATIS-1898. Netty should use EpollEventLoopGroup by default (apache/ratis#931)
- RATIS-1899. Use EpollEventLoopGroup for Netty Proxies (apache/ratis#932)
- RATIS-1921. Shared worker group in WorkerGroupGetter should be closed. (apache/ratis#955)
- RATIS-1923. Netty: atomic operations require side-effect-free functions. (apache/ratis#956)
- RaftServer
- RATIS-1924. Increase the default of raft.server.log.segment.size.max. (apache/ratis#957)
- RATIS-1892. Unify the lifetime of the RaftServerProxy thread pool (apache/ratis#923)
- RATIS-1889. NoSuchMethodError: RaftServerMetricsImpl.addNumPendingRequestsGauge apache/ratis#922 (apache/ratis#922)
- RATIS-761. Handle writeStateMachineData failure in leader. (apache/ratis#927)
- RATIS-1902. The snapshot index is set incorrectly in InstallSnapshotReplyProto. (apache/ratis#933)
- RATIS-1912. Fix infinity election when perform membership change. (apache/ratis#954)
- RATIS-1858. Follower keeps logging first election timeout. (apache/ratis#894)
- 3.0.1:This is a bugfix release. See the [changes between 3.0.0 and 3.0.1](apache/ratis@ratis-3.0.0...ratis-3.0.1) releases.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Cluster manual test.
Closes#2480 from SteNicholas/CELEBORN-1400.
Authored-by: SteNicholas <programgeek@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuang <lvshuang.xjs@alibaba-inc.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@SzyWilliam@tisonkun@szetszwo
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
RATIS-1882. Support read-after-write consistency by SzyWilliam · Pull Request #913 · apache/ratis · GitHub
Skip to content

RATIS-1882. Support read-after-write consistency - #913

Merged
szetszwo merged 5 commits into
apache:masterfrom
SzyWilliam:jira1882
Sep 5, 2023
Merged

RATIS-1882. Support read-after-write consistency#913
szetszwo merged 5 commits into
apache:masterfrom
SzyWilliam:jira1882

Conversation

@SzyWilliam

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Support read-after-write consistency.
Thanks @szetszwo very much for the patch. Only made minor changes and added unit tests to the patch.

What is the link to the Apache JIRA

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-1882

How was this patch tested?

New unit tests.

@szetszwoszetszwo left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 the change looks good. Just a very minor comment inlined.

Also, spent some time to add another unit test; see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/13062665/TestReadAfterWrite.patch
Could you include it?

Comment on lines +62 to +65
final CompletableFuture<Long> future = ref != null? ref.get(): null;
if (future != null) {
return future;
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just found that these few lines can be simplified as below.

if (ref != null) {
returnref.get();
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done


@Override
public CompletableFuture<RaftClientReply> sendReadAfterWrite(Message message) {
return send(RaftClientRequest.readAfterWriteConsistentRequestType(), message, null);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@SzyWilliam , Should sendReadAfterWrite use UnorderedAsync.send(..)? Indeed, all the linearizable reads should use UnorderedAsync.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's true! Thanks for pointing out, I'll change all the linearizable reads to use UnorderedAsync

@SzyWilliam

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@szetszwo Thanks very much for the patch! It's good to know CodeInjectionForTesting can be used for blocking. I'll try using Injection to replace the sleep time in the linearizable read index tests.

@szetszwoszetszwo left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's use OrderedAsync due to the test failure. Could you also include the following?

diff --gita/ratis-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ratis/protocol/RaftClientRequest.javab/ratis-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ratis/protocol/RaftClientRequest.javaindex4b0c5166..220694ce100644
--- a/ratis-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ratis/protocol/RaftClientRequest.java
+++ b/ratis-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ratis/protocol/RaftClientRequest.java@@ -227,7 +227,10@@publicclassRaftClientRequestextendsRaftClientMessage {
caseMESSAGESTREAM:
returntoString(getMessageStream());
caseREAD:
- return"RO";
+ finalReadRequestTypeProtoread = getRead();
+ returnread.getReadAfterWriteConsistent()? "RaW"
+ : read.getPreferNonLinearizable()? "RO(pNL)"
+ : "RO";
caseSTALEREAD:
return"StaleRead(" + getStaleRead().getMinIndex() + ")";
caseWATCH:
diff --gita/ratis-examples/src/test/java/org/apache/ratis/server/impl/TestReadAfterWrite.javab/ratis-examples/src/test/java/org/apache/ratis/server/impl/TestReadAfterWrite.javaindexf8f2405c..f515628c100644
--- a/ratis-examples/src/test/java/org/apache/ratis/server/impl/TestReadAfterWrite.java
+++ b/ratis-examples/src/test/java/org/apache/ratis/server/impl/TestReadAfterWrite.java@@ -128,8 +128,10@@publicclassTestReadAfterWriteLOG.info("readAfterWrite.get");
try {
// readAfterWrite should time out
- readAfterWrite.get(100, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
- Assert.fail();
+ finalRaftClientReplyreply = readAfterWrite.get(100, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
+ finalDoubleValueresult = (DoubleValue) Expression.Utils.bytes2Expression(
+ reply.getMessage().getContent().toByteArray(), 0);
+ Assert.fail("result=" + result + ", reply=" + reply);
} catch (TimeoutExceptione) {
LOG.info("Good", e);
}

@Override
public CompletableFuture<RaftClientReply> sendReadAfterWrite(Message message) {
return send(RaftClientRequest.readAfterWriteConsistentRequestType(), message, null);
return UnorderedAsync.send(RaftClientRequest.readAfterWriteConsistentRequestType(), message, null, client);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, it actually not working since UnorderedAsync use a different channel. It can arrive the server earlier than the previous write request and get a small readIndex. TestReadAfterWrite will fail.

  • Using unordered async
2023-09-04 11:16:59,888 DEBUG server.RaftServer$Division (LeaderStateImpl.java:getReadIndex(1099)) - readIndex=1, readAfterWriteConsistentIndex=1
  • Using ordered async
2023-09-04 11:11:36,917 DEBUG server.RaftServer$Division (LeaderStateImpl.java:getReadIndex(1099)) - readIndex=3, readAfterWriteConsistentIndex=3

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You are right. Just investigated on OrderedAsync and UnorderedAsync and now I know why we should choose OrderedAsync. Thanks very much for your time spent and the detailed explanation!

@szetszwo
szetszwo merged commit 88405b0 into apache:masterSep 5, 2023
Brokenice0415 pushed a commit to Brokenice0415/ratis that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2023
@tisonkun

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Cool! I'm checking this out.

@tisonkun

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

May I ask what is the target release version of this feature?

@szetszwo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We should include this to both 3.0.0 and the next branch 2 releases.

symious pushed a commit to symious/ratis that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2024
RexXiong pushed a commit to apache/celeborn that referenced this pull request May 30, 2024
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Bump Ratis version from 2.5.1 to 3.0.1. Address incompatible changes:
- RATIS-589. Eliminate buffer copying in SegmentedRaftLogOutputStream.(apache/ratis#964)
- RATIS-1677. Do not auto format RaftStorage in RECOVER.(apache/ratis#718)
- RATIS-1710. Refactor metrics api and implementation to separated modules. (apache/ratis#749)
### Why are the changes needed?
Bump Ratis version from 2.5.1 to 3.0.1. Ratis has released v3.0.0, v3.0.1, which release note refers to [3.0.0](https://ratis.apache.org/post/3.0.0.html), [3.0.1](https://ratis.apache.org/post/3.0.1.html). The 3.0.x version include new features like pluggable metrics and lease read, etc, some improvements and bugfixes including:
- 3.0.0: Change list of ratis 3.0.0 In total, there are roughly 100 commits diffing from 2.5.1 including:
- Incompatible Changes
- RaftStorage Auto-Format
- RATIS-1677. Do not auto format RaftStorage in RECOVER. (apache/ratis#718)
- RATIS-1694. Fix the compatibility issue of RATIS-1677. (apache/ratis#731)
- RATIS-1871. Auto format RaftStorage when there is only one directory configured. (apache/ratis#903)
- Pluggable Ratis-Metrics (RATIS-1688)
- RATIS-1689. Remove the use of the thirdparty Gauge. (apache/ratis#728)
- RATIS-1692. Remove the use of the thirdparty Counter. (apache/ratis#732)
- RATIS-1693. Remove the use of the thirdparty Timer. (apache/ratis#734)
- RATIS-1703. Move MetricsReporting and JvmMetrics to impl. (apache/ratis#741)
- RATIS-1704. Fix SuppressWarnings(“VisibilityModifier”) in RatisMetrics. (apache/ratis#742)
- RATIS-1710. Refactor metrics api and implementation to separated modules. (apache/ratis#749)
- RATIS-1712. Add a dropwizard 3 implementation of ratis-metrics-api. (apache/ratis#751)
- RATIS-1391. Update library dropwizard.metrics version to 4.x (apache/ratis#632)
- RATIS-1601. Use the shaded dropwizard metrics and remove the dependency (apache/ratis#671)
- Streaming Protocol Change
- RATIS-1569. Move the asyncRpcApi.sendForward(..) call to the client side. (apache/ratis#635)
- New Features
- Leader Lease (RATIS-1864)
- RATIS-1865. Add leader lease bound ratio configuration (apache/ratis#897)
- RATIS-1866. Maintain leader lease after AppendEntries (apache/ratis#898)
- RATIS-1894. Implement ReadOnly based on leader lease (apache/ratis#925)
- RATIS-1882. Support read-after-write consistency (apache/ratis#913)
- StateMachine API
- RATIS-1874. Add notifyLeaderReady function in IStateMachine (apache/ratis#906)
- RATIS-1897. Make TransactionContext available in DataApi.write(..). (apache/ratis#930)
- New Configuration Properties
- RATIS-1862. Add the parameter whether to take Snapshot when stopping to adapt to different services (apache/ratis#896)
- RATIS-1930. Add a conf for enable/disable majority-add. (apache/ratis#961)
- RATIS-1918. Introduces parameters that separately control the shutdown of RaftServerProxy by JVMPauseMonitor. (apache/ratis#950)
- RATIS-1636. Support re-config ratis properties (apache/ratis#800)
- RATIS-1860. Add ratis-shell cmd to generate a new raft-meta.conf. (apache/ratis#901)
- Improvements & Bug Fixes
- Netty
- RATIS-1898. Netty should use EpollEventLoopGroup by default (apache/ratis#931)
- RATIS-1899. Use EpollEventLoopGroup for Netty Proxies (apache/ratis#932)
- RATIS-1921. Shared worker group in WorkerGroupGetter should be closed. (apache/ratis#955)
- RATIS-1923. Netty: atomic operations require side-effect-free functions. (apache/ratis#956)
- RaftServer
- RATIS-1924. Increase the default of raft.server.log.segment.size.max. (apache/ratis#957)
- RATIS-1892. Unify the lifetime of the RaftServerProxy thread pool (apache/ratis#923)
- RATIS-1889. NoSuchMethodError: RaftServerMetricsImpl.addNumPendingRequestsGauge apache/ratis#922 (apache/ratis#922)
- RATIS-761. Handle writeStateMachineData failure in leader. (apache/ratis#927)
- RATIS-1902. The snapshot index is set incorrectly in InstallSnapshotReplyProto. (apache/ratis#933)
- RATIS-1912. Fix infinity election when perform membership change. (apache/ratis#954)
- RATIS-1858. Follower keeps logging first election timeout. (apache/ratis#894)
- 3.0.1:This is a bugfix release. See the [changes between 3.0.0 and 3.0.1](apache/ratis@ratis-3.0.0...ratis-3.0.1) releases.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Cluster manual test.
Closes#2480 from SteNicholas/CELEBORN-1400.
Authored-by: SteNicholas <programgeek@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuang <lvshuang.xjs@alibaba-inc.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@SzyWilliam@tisonkun@szetszwo
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' RATIS-1882. Support read-after-write consistency by SzyWilliam · Pull Request #913 · apache/ratis · GitHub
Skip to content

RATIS-1882. Support read-after-write consistency - #913

Merged
szetszwo merged 5 commits into
apache:masterfrom
SzyWilliam:jira1882
Sep 5, 2023
Merged

RATIS-1882. Support read-after-write consistency#913
szetszwo merged 5 commits into
apache:masterfrom
SzyWilliam:jira1882

Conversation

@SzyWilliam

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Support read-after-write consistency.
Thanks @szetszwo very much for the patch. Only made minor changes and added unit tests to the patch.

What is the link to the Apache JIRA

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-1882

How was this patch tested?

New unit tests.

@szetszwoszetszwo left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 the change looks good. Just a very minor comment inlined.

Also, spent some time to add another unit test; see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/13062665/TestReadAfterWrite.patch
Could you include it?

Comment on lines +62 to +65
final CompletableFuture<Long> future = ref != null? ref.get(): null;
if (future != null) {
return future;
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just found that these few lines can be simplified as below.

if (ref != null) {
returnref.get();
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done


@Override
public CompletableFuture<RaftClientReply> sendReadAfterWrite(Message message) {
return send(RaftClientRequest.readAfterWriteConsistentRequestType(), message, null);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@SzyWilliam , Should sendReadAfterWrite use UnorderedAsync.send(..)? Indeed, all the linearizable reads should use UnorderedAsync.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's true! Thanks for pointing out, I'll change all the linearizable reads to use UnorderedAsync

@SzyWilliam

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@szetszwo Thanks very much for the patch! It's good to know CodeInjectionForTesting can be used for blocking. I'll try using Injection to replace the sleep time in the linearizable read index tests.

@szetszwoszetszwo left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's use OrderedAsync due to the test failure. Could you also include the following?

diff --gita/ratis-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ratis/protocol/RaftClientRequest.javab/ratis-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ratis/protocol/RaftClientRequest.javaindex4b0c5166..220694ce100644
--- a/ratis-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ratis/protocol/RaftClientRequest.java
+++ b/ratis-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ratis/protocol/RaftClientRequest.java@@ -227,7 +227,10@@publicclassRaftClientRequestextendsRaftClientMessage {
caseMESSAGESTREAM:
returntoString(getMessageStream());
caseREAD:
- return"RO";
+ finalReadRequestTypeProtoread = getRead();
+ returnread.getReadAfterWriteConsistent()? "RaW"
+ : read.getPreferNonLinearizable()? "RO(pNL)"
+ : "RO";
caseSTALEREAD:
return"StaleRead(" + getStaleRead().getMinIndex() + ")";
caseWATCH:
diff --gita/ratis-examples/src/test/java/org/apache/ratis/server/impl/TestReadAfterWrite.javab/ratis-examples/src/test/java/org/apache/ratis/server/impl/TestReadAfterWrite.javaindexf8f2405c..f515628c100644
--- a/ratis-examples/src/test/java/org/apache/ratis/server/impl/TestReadAfterWrite.java
+++ b/ratis-examples/src/test/java/org/apache/ratis/server/impl/TestReadAfterWrite.java@@ -128,8 +128,10@@publicclassTestReadAfterWriteLOG.info("readAfterWrite.get");
try {
// readAfterWrite should time out
- readAfterWrite.get(100, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
- Assert.fail();
+ finalRaftClientReplyreply = readAfterWrite.get(100, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
+ finalDoubleValueresult = (DoubleValue) Expression.Utils.bytes2Expression(
+ reply.getMessage().getContent().toByteArray(), 0);
+ Assert.fail("result=" + result + ", reply=" + reply);
} catch (TimeoutExceptione) {
LOG.info("Good", e);
}

@Override
public CompletableFuture<RaftClientReply> sendReadAfterWrite(Message message) {
return send(RaftClientRequest.readAfterWriteConsistentRequestType(), message, null);
return UnorderedAsync.send(RaftClientRequest.readAfterWriteConsistentRequestType(), message, null, client);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, it actually not working since UnorderedAsync use a different channel. It can arrive the server earlier than the previous write request and get a small readIndex. TestReadAfterWrite will fail.

  • Using unordered async
2023-09-04 11:16:59,888 DEBUG server.RaftServer$Division (LeaderStateImpl.java:getReadIndex(1099)) - readIndex=1, readAfterWriteConsistentIndex=1
  • Using ordered async
2023-09-04 11:11:36,917 DEBUG server.RaftServer$Division (LeaderStateImpl.java:getReadIndex(1099)) - readIndex=3, readAfterWriteConsistentIndex=3

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You are right. Just investigated on OrderedAsync and UnorderedAsync and now I know why we should choose OrderedAsync. Thanks very much for your time spent and the detailed explanation!

@szetszwo
szetszwo merged commit 88405b0 into apache:masterSep 5, 2023
Brokenice0415 pushed a commit to Brokenice0415/ratis that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2023
@tisonkun

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Cool! I'm checking this out.

@tisonkun

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

May I ask what is the target release version of this feature?

@szetszwo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We should include this to both 3.0.0 and the next branch 2 releases.

symious pushed a commit to symious/ratis that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2024
RexXiong pushed a commit to apache/celeborn that referenced this pull request May 30, 2024
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Bump Ratis version from 2.5.1 to 3.0.1. Address incompatible changes:
- RATIS-589. Eliminate buffer copying in SegmentedRaftLogOutputStream.(apache/ratis#964)
- RATIS-1677. Do not auto format RaftStorage in RECOVER.(apache/ratis#718)
- RATIS-1710. Refactor metrics api and implementation to separated modules. (apache/ratis#749)
### Why are the changes needed?
Bump Ratis version from 2.5.1 to 3.0.1. Ratis has released v3.0.0, v3.0.1, which release note refers to [3.0.0](https://ratis.apache.org/post/3.0.0.html), [3.0.1](https://ratis.apache.org/post/3.0.1.html). The 3.0.x version include new features like pluggable metrics and lease read, etc, some improvements and bugfixes including:
- 3.0.0: Change list of ratis 3.0.0 In total, there are roughly 100 commits diffing from 2.5.1 including:
- Incompatible Changes
- RaftStorage Auto-Format
- RATIS-1677. Do not auto format RaftStorage in RECOVER. (apache/ratis#718)
- RATIS-1694. Fix the compatibility issue of RATIS-1677. (apache/ratis#731)
- RATIS-1871. Auto format RaftStorage when there is only one directory configured. (apache/ratis#903)
- Pluggable Ratis-Metrics (RATIS-1688)
- RATIS-1689. Remove the use of the thirdparty Gauge. (apache/ratis#728)
- RATIS-1692. Remove the use of the thirdparty Counter. (apache/ratis#732)
- RATIS-1693. Remove the use of the thirdparty Timer. (apache/ratis#734)
- RATIS-1703. Move MetricsReporting and JvmMetrics to impl. (apache/ratis#741)
- RATIS-1704. Fix SuppressWarnings(“VisibilityModifier”) in RatisMetrics. (apache/ratis#742)
- RATIS-1710. Refactor metrics api and implementation to separated modules. (apache/ratis#749)
- RATIS-1712. Add a dropwizard 3 implementation of ratis-metrics-api. (apache/ratis#751)
- RATIS-1391. Update library dropwizard.metrics version to 4.x (apache/ratis#632)
- RATIS-1601. Use the shaded dropwizard metrics and remove the dependency (apache/ratis#671)
- Streaming Protocol Change
- RATIS-1569. Move the asyncRpcApi.sendForward(..) call to the client side. (apache/ratis#635)
- New Features
- Leader Lease (RATIS-1864)
- RATIS-1865. Add leader lease bound ratio configuration (apache/ratis#897)
- RATIS-1866. Maintain leader lease after AppendEntries (apache/ratis#898)
- RATIS-1894. Implement ReadOnly based on leader lease (apache/ratis#925)
- RATIS-1882. Support read-after-write consistency (apache/ratis#913)
- StateMachine API
- RATIS-1874. Add notifyLeaderReady function in IStateMachine (apache/ratis#906)
- RATIS-1897. Make TransactionContext available in DataApi.write(..). (apache/ratis#930)
- New Configuration Properties
- RATIS-1862. Add the parameter whether to take Snapshot when stopping to adapt to different services (apache/ratis#896)
- RATIS-1930. Add a conf for enable/disable majority-add. (apache/ratis#961)
- RATIS-1918. Introduces parameters that separately control the shutdown of RaftServerProxy by JVMPauseMonitor. (apache/ratis#950)
- RATIS-1636. Support re-config ratis properties (apache/ratis#800)
- RATIS-1860. Add ratis-shell cmd to generate a new raft-meta.conf. (apache/ratis#901)
- Improvements & Bug Fixes
- Netty
- RATIS-1898. Netty should use EpollEventLoopGroup by default (apache/ratis#931)
- RATIS-1899. Use EpollEventLoopGroup for Netty Proxies (apache/ratis#932)
- RATIS-1921. Shared worker group in WorkerGroupGetter should be closed. (apache/ratis#955)
- RATIS-1923. Netty: atomic operations require side-effect-free functions. (apache/ratis#956)
- RaftServer
- RATIS-1924. Increase the default of raft.server.log.segment.size.max. (apache/ratis#957)
- RATIS-1892. Unify the lifetime of the RaftServerProxy thread pool (apache/ratis#923)
- RATIS-1889. NoSuchMethodError: RaftServerMetricsImpl.addNumPendingRequestsGauge apache/ratis#922 (apache/ratis#922)
- RATIS-761. Handle writeStateMachineData failure in leader. (apache/ratis#927)
- RATIS-1902. The snapshot index is set incorrectly in InstallSnapshotReplyProto. (apache/ratis#933)
- RATIS-1912. Fix infinity election when perform membership change. (apache/ratis#954)
- RATIS-1858. Follower keeps logging first election timeout. (apache/ratis#894)
- 3.0.1:This is a bugfix release. See the [changes between 3.0.0 and 3.0.1](apache/ratis@ratis-3.0.0...ratis-3.0.1) releases.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Cluster manual test.
Closes#2480 from SteNicholas/CELEBORN-1400.
Authored-by: SteNicholas <programgeek@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuang <lvshuang.xjs@alibaba-inc.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@SzyWilliam@tisonkun@szetszwo
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' RATIS-1882. Support read-after-write consistency by SzyWilliam · Pull Request #913 · apache/ratis · GitHub
Skip to content

RATIS-1882. Support read-after-write consistency - #913

Merged
szetszwo merged 5 commits into
apache:masterfrom
SzyWilliam:jira1882
Sep 5, 2023
Merged

RATIS-1882. Support read-after-write consistency#913
szetszwo merged 5 commits into
apache:masterfrom
SzyWilliam:jira1882

Conversation

@SzyWilliam

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Support read-after-write consistency.
Thanks @szetszwo very much for the patch. Only made minor changes and added unit tests to the patch.

What is the link to the Apache JIRA

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-1882

How was this patch tested?

New unit tests.

@szetszwoszetszwo left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 the change looks good. Just a very minor comment inlined.

Also, spent some time to add another unit test; see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/13062665/TestReadAfterWrite.patch
Could you include it?

Comment on lines +62 to +65
final CompletableFuture<Long> future = ref != null? ref.get(): null;
if (future != null) {
return future;
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just found that these few lines can be simplified as below.

if (ref != null) {
returnref.get();
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done


@Override
public CompletableFuture<RaftClientReply> sendReadAfterWrite(Message message) {
return send(RaftClientRequest.readAfterWriteConsistentRequestType(), message, null);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@SzyWilliam , Should sendReadAfterWrite use UnorderedAsync.send(..)? Indeed, all the linearizable reads should use UnorderedAsync.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's true! Thanks for pointing out, I'll change all the linearizable reads to use UnorderedAsync

@SzyWilliam

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@szetszwo Thanks very much for the patch! It's good to know CodeInjectionForTesting can be used for blocking. I'll try using Injection to replace the sleep time in the linearizable read index tests.

@szetszwoszetszwo left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's use OrderedAsync due to the test failure. Could you also include the following?

diff --gita/ratis-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ratis/protocol/RaftClientRequest.javab/ratis-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ratis/protocol/RaftClientRequest.javaindex4b0c5166..220694ce100644
--- a/ratis-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ratis/protocol/RaftClientRequest.java
+++ b/ratis-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ratis/protocol/RaftClientRequest.java@@ -227,7 +227,10@@publicclassRaftClientRequestextendsRaftClientMessage {
caseMESSAGESTREAM:
returntoString(getMessageStream());
caseREAD:
- return"RO";
+ finalReadRequestTypeProtoread = getRead();
+ returnread.getReadAfterWriteConsistent()? "RaW"
+ : read.getPreferNonLinearizable()? "RO(pNL)"
+ : "RO";
caseSTALEREAD:
return"StaleRead(" + getStaleRead().getMinIndex() + ")";
caseWATCH:
diff --gita/ratis-examples/src/test/java/org/apache/ratis/server/impl/TestReadAfterWrite.javab/ratis-examples/src/test/java/org/apache/ratis/server/impl/TestReadAfterWrite.javaindexf8f2405c..f515628c100644
--- a/ratis-examples/src/test/java/org/apache/ratis/server/impl/TestReadAfterWrite.java
+++ b/ratis-examples/src/test/java/org/apache/ratis/server/impl/TestReadAfterWrite.java@@ -128,8 +128,10@@publicclassTestReadAfterWriteLOG.info("readAfterWrite.get");
try {
// readAfterWrite should time out
- readAfterWrite.get(100, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
- Assert.fail();
+ finalRaftClientReplyreply = readAfterWrite.get(100, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
+ finalDoubleValueresult = (DoubleValue) Expression.Utils.bytes2Expression(
+ reply.getMessage().getContent().toByteArray(), 0);
+ Assert.fail("result=" + result + ", reply=" + reply);
} catch (TimeoutExceptione) {
LOG.info("Good", e);
}

@Override
public CompletableFuture<RaftClientReply> sendReadAfterWrite(Message message) {
return send(RaftClientRequest.readAfterWriteConsistentRequestType(), message, null);
return UnorderedAsync.send(RaftClientRequest.readAfterWriteConsistentRequestType(), message, null, client);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, it actually not working since UnorderedAsync use a different channel. It can arrive the server earlier than the previous write request and get a small readIndex. TestReadAfterWrite will fail.

  • Using unordered async
2023-09-04 11:16:59,888 DEBUG server.RaftServer$Division (LeaderStateImpl.java:getReadIndex(1099)) - readIndex=1, readAfterWriteConsistentIndex=1
  • Using ordered async
2023-09-04 11:11:36,917 DEBUG server.RaftServer$Division (LeaderStateImpl.java:getReadIndex(1099)) - readIndex=3, readAfterWriteConsistentIndex=3

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You are right. Just investigated on OrderedAsync and UnorderedAsync and now I know why we should choose OrderedAsync. Thanks very much for your time spent and the detailed explanation!

@szetszwo
szetszwo merged commit 88405b0 into apache:masterSep 5, 2023
Brokenice0415 pushed a commit to Brokenice0415/ratis that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2023
@tisonkun

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Cool! I'm checking this out.

@tisonkun

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

May I ask what is the target release version of this feature?

@szetszwo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We should include this to both 3.0.0 and the next branch 2 releases.

symious pushed a commit to symious/ratis that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2024
RexXiong pushed a commit to apache/celeborn that referenced this pull request May 30, 2024
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Bump Ratis version from 2.5.1 to 3.0.1. Address incompatible changes:
- RATIS-589. Eliminate buffer copying in SegmentedRaftLogOutputStream.(apache/ratis#964)
- RATIS-1677. Do not auto format RaftStorage in RECOVER.(apache/ratis#718)
- RATIS-1710. Refactor metrics api and implementation to separated modules. (apache/ratis#749)
### Why are the changes needed?
Bump Ratis version from 2.5.1 to 3.0.1. Ratis has released v3.0.0, v3.0.1, which release note refers to [3.0.0](https://ratis.apache.org/post/3.0.0.html), [3.0.1](https://ratis.apache.org/post/3.0.1.html). The 3.0.x version include new features like pluggable metrics and lease read, etc, some improvements and bugfixes including:
- 3.0.0: Change list of ratis 3.0.0 In total, there are roughly 100 commits diffing from 2.5.1 including:
- Incompatible Changes
- RaftStorage Auto-Format
- RATIS-1677. Do not auto format RaftStorage in RECOVER. (apache/ratis#718)
- RATIS-1694. Fix the compatibility issue of RATIS-1677. (apache/ratis#731)
- RATIS-1871. Auto format RaftStorage when there is only one directory configured. (apache/ratis#903)
- Pluggable Ratis-Metrics (RATIS-1688)
- RATIS-1689. Remove the use of the thirdparty Gauge. (apache/ratis#728)
- RATIS-1692. Remove the use of the thirdparty Counter. (apache/ratis#732)
- RATIS-1693. Remove the use of the thirdparty Timer. (apache/ratis#734)
- RATIS-1703. Move MetricsReporting and JvmMetrics to impl. (apache/ratis#741)
- RATIS-1704. Fix SuppressWarnings(“VisibilityModifier”) in RatisMetrics. (apache/ratis#742)
- RATIS-1710. Refactor metrics api and implementation to separated modules. (apache/ratis#749)
- RATIS-1712. Add a dropwizard 3 implementation of ratis-metrics-api. (apache/ratis#751)
- RATIS-1391. Update library dropwizard.metrics version to 4.x (apache/ratis#632)
- RATIS-1601. Use the shaded dropwizard metrics and remove the dependency (apache/ratis#671)
- Streaming Protocol Change
- RATIS-1569. Move the asyncRpcApi.sendForward(..) call to the client side. (apache/ratis#635)
- New Features
- Leader Lease (RATIS-1864)
- RATIS-1865. Add leader lease bound ratio configuration (apache/ratis#897)
- RATIS-1866. Maintain leader lease after AppendEntries (apache/ratis#898)
- RATIS-1894. Implement ReadOnly based on leader lease (apache/ratis#925)
- RATIS-1882. Support read-after-write consistency (apache/ratis#913)
- StateMachine API
- RATIS-1874. Add notifyLeaderReady function in IStateMachine (apache/ratis#906)
- RATIS-1897. Make TransactionContext available in DataApi.write(..). (apache/ratis#930)
- New Configuration Properties
- RATIS-1862. Add the parameter whether to take Snapshot when stopping to adapt to different services (apache/ratis#896)
- RATIS-1930. Add a conf for enable/disable majority-add. (apache/ratis#961)
- RATIS-1918. Introduces parameters that separately control the shutdown of RaftServerProxy by JVMPauseMonitor. (apache/ratis#950)
- RATIS-1636. Support re-config ratis properties (apache/ratis#800)
- RATIS-1860. Add ratis-shell cmd to generate a new raft-meta.conf. (apache/ratis#901)
- Improvements & Bug Fixes
- Netty
- RATIS-1898. Netty should use EpollEventLoopGroup by default (apache/ratis#931)
- RATIS-1899. Use EpollEventLoopGroup for Netty Proxies (apache/ratis#932)
- RATIS-1921. Shared worker group in WorkerGroupGetter should be closed. (apache/ratis#955)
- RATIS-1923. Netty: atomic operations require side-effect-free functions. (apache/ratis#956)
- RaftServer
- RATIS-1924. Increase the default of raft.server.log.segment.size.max. (apache/ratis#957)
- RATIS-1892. Unify the lifetime of the RaftServerProxy thread pool (apache/ratis#923)
- RATIS-1889. NoSuchMethodError: RaftServerMetricsImpl.addNumPendingRequestsGauge apache/ratis#922 (apache/ratis#922)
- RATIS-761. Handle writeStateMachineData failure in leader. (apache/ratis#927)
- RATIS-1902. The snapshot index is set incorrectly in InstallSnapshotReplyProto. (apache/ratis#933)
- RATIS-1912. Fix infinity election when perform membership change. (apache/ratis#954)
- RATIS-1858. Follower keeps logging first election timeout. (apache/ratis#894)
- 3.0.1:This is a bugfix release. See the [changes between 3.0.0 and 3.0.1](apache/ratis@ratis-3.0.0...ratis-3.0.1) releases.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Cluster manual test.
Closes#2480 from SteNicholas/CELEBORN-1400.
Authored-by: SteNicholas <programgeek@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuang <lvshuang.xjs@alibaba-inc.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@SzyWilliam@tisonkun@szetszwo
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' RATIS-1882. Support read-after-write consistency by SzyWilliam · Pull Request #913 · apache/ratis · GitHub
Skip to content

RATIS-1882. Support read-after-write consistency - #913

Merged
szetszwo merged 5 commits into
apache:masterfrom
SzyWilliam:jira1882
Sep 5, 2023
Merged

RATIS-1882. Support read-after-write consistency#913
szetszwo merged 5 commits into
apache:masterfrom
SzyWilliam:jira1882

Conversation

@SzyWilliam

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Support read-after-write consistency.
Thanks @szetszwo very much for the patch. Only made minor changes and added unit tests to the patch.

What is the link to the Apache JIRA

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-1882

How was this patch tested?

New unit tests.

@szetszwoszetszwo left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 the change looks good. Just a very minor comment inlined.

Also, spent some time to add another unit test; see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/13062665/TestReadAfterWrite.patch
Could you include it?

Comment on lines +62 to +65
final CompletableFuture<Long> future = ref != null? ref.get(): null;
if (future != null) {
return future;
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just found that these few lines can be simplified as below.

if (ref != null) {
returnref.get();
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done


@Override
public CompletableFuture<RaftClientReply> sendReadAfterWrite(Message message) {
return send(RaftClientRequest.readAfterWriteConsistentRequestType(), message, null);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@SzyWilliam , Should sendReadAfterWrite use UnorderedAsync.send(..)? Indeed, all the linearizable reads should use UnorderedAsync.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's true! Thanks for pointing out, I'll change all the linearizable reads to use UnorderedAsync

@SzyWilliam

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@szetszwo Thanks very much for the patch! It's good to know CodeInjectionForTesting can be used for blocking. I'll try using Injection to replace the sleep time in the linearizable read index tests.

@szetszwoszetszwo left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's use OrderedAsync due to the test failure. Could you also include the following?

diff --gita/ratis-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ratis/protocol/RaftClientRequest.javab/ratis-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ratis/protocol/RaftClientRequest.javaindex4b0c5166..220694ce100644
--- a/ratis-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ratis/protocol/RaftClientRequest.java
+++ b/ratis-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ratis/protocol/RaftClientRequest.java@@ -227,7 +227,10@@publicclassRaftClientRequestextendsRaftClientMessage {
caseMESSAGESTREAM:
returntoString(getMessageStream());
caseREAD:
- return"RO";
+ finalReadRequestTypeProtoread = getRead();
+ returnread.getReadAfterWriteConsistent()? "RaW"
+ : read.getPreferNonLinearizable()? "RO(pNL)"
+ : "RO";
caseSTALEREAD:
return"StaleRead(" + getStaleRead().getMinIndex() + ")";
caseWATCH:
diff --gita/ratis-examples/src/test/java/org/apache/ratis/server/impl/TestReadAfterWrite.javab/ratis-examples/src/test/java/org/apache/ratis/server/impl/TestReadAfterWrite.javaindexf8f2405c..f515628c100644
--- a/ratis-examples/src/test/java/org/apache/ratis/server/impl/TestReadAfterWrite.java
+++ b/ratis-examples/src/test/java/org/apache/ratis/server/impl/TestReadAfterWrite.java@@ -128,8 +128,10@@publicclassTestReadAfterWriteLOG.info("readAfterWrite.get");
try {
// readAfterWrite should time out
- readAfterWrite.get(100, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
- Assert.fail();
+ finalRaftClientReplyreply = readAfterWrite.get(100, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
+ finalDoubleValueresult = (DoubleValue) Expression.Utils.bytes2Expression(
+ reply.getMessage().getContent().toByteArray(), 0);
+ Assert.fail("result=" + result + ", reply=" + reply);
} catch (TimeoutExceptione) {
LOG.info("Good", e);
}

@Override
public CompletableFuture<RaftClientReply> sendReadAfterWrite(Message message) {
return send(RaftClientRequest.readAfterWriteConsistentRequestType(), message, null);
return UnorderedAsync.send(RaftClientRequest.readAfterWriteConsistentRequestType(), message, null, client);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, it actually not working since UnorderedAsync use a different channel. It can arrive the server earlier than the previous write request and get a small readIndex. TestReadAfterWrite will fail.

  • Using unordered async
2023-09-04 11:16:59,888 DEBUG server.RaftServer$Division (LeaderStateImpl.java:getReadIndex(1099)) - readIndex=1, readAfterWriteConsistentIndex=1
  • Using ordered async
2023-09-04 11:11:36,917 DEBUG server.RaftServer$Division (LeaderStateImpl.java:getReadIndex(1099)) - readIndex=3, readAfterWriteConsistentIndex=3

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You are right. Just investigated on OrderedAsync and UnorderedAsync and now I know why we should choose OrderedAsync. Thanks very much for your time spent and the detailed explanation!

@szetszwo
szetszwo merged commit 88405b0 into apache:masterSep 5, 2023
Brokenice0415 pushed a commit to Brokenice0415/ratis that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2023
@tisonkun

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Cool! I'm checking this out.

@tisonkun

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

May I ask what is the target release version of this feature?

@szetszwo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We should include this to both 3.0.0 and the next branch 2 releases.

symious pushed a commit to symious/ratis that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2024
RexXiong pushed a commit to apache/celeborn that referenced this pull request May 30, 2024
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Bump Ratis version from 2.5.1 to 3.0.1. Address incompatible changes:
- RATIS-589. Eliminate buffer copying in SegmentedRaftLogOutputStream.(apache/ratis#964)
- RATIS-1677. Do not auto format RaftStorage in RECOVER.(apache/ratis#718)
- RATIS-1710. Refactor metrics api and implementation to separated modules. (apache/ratis#749)
### Why are the changes needed?
Bump Ratis version from 2.5.1 to 3.0.1. Ratis has released v3.0.0, v3.0.1, which release note refers to [3.0.0](https://ratis.apache.org/post/3.0.0.html), [3.0.1](https://ratis.apache.org/post/3.0.1.html). The 3.0.x version include new features like pluggable metrics and lease read, etc, some improvements and bugfixes including:
- 3.0.0: Change list of ratis 3.0.0 In total, there are roughly 100 commits diffing from 2.5.1 including:
- Incompatible Changes
- RaftStorage Auto-Format
- RATIS-1677. Do not auto format RaftStorage in RECOVER. (apache/ratis#718)
- RATIS-1694. Fix the compatibility issue of RATIS-1677. (apache/ratis#731)
- RATIS-1871. Auto format RaftStorage when there is only one directory configured. (apache/ratis#903)
- Pluggable Ratis-Metrics (RATIS-1688)
- RATIS-1689. Remove the use of the thirdparty Gauge. (apache/ratis#728)
- RATIS-1692. Remove the use of the thirdparty Counter. (apache/ratis#732)
- RATIS-1693. Remove the use of the thirdparty Timer. (apache/ratis#734)
- RATIS-1703. Move MetricsReporting and JvmMetrics to impl. (apache/ratis#741)
- RATIS-1704. Fix SuppressWarnings(“VisibilityModifier”) in RatisMetrics. (apache/ratis#742)
- RATIS-1710. Refactor metrics api and implementation to separated modules. (apache/ratis#749)
- RATIS-1712. Add a dropwizard 3 implementation of ratis-metrics-api. (apache/ratis#751)
- RATIS-1391. Update library dropwizard.metrics version to 4.x (apache/ratis#632)
- RATIS-1601. Use the shaded dropwizard metrics and remove the dependency (apache/ratis#671)
- Streaming Protocol Change
- RATIS-1569. Move the asyncRpcApi.sendForward(..) call to the client side. (apache/ratis#635)
- New Features
- Leader Lease (RATIS-1864)
- RATIS-1865. Add leader lease bound ratio configuration (apache/ratis#897)
- RATIS-1866. Maintain leader lease after AppendEntries (apache/ratis#898)
- RATIS-1894. Implement ReadOnly based on leader lease (apache/ratis#925)
- RATIS-1882. Support read-after-write consistency (apache/ratis#913)
- StateMachine API
- RATIS-1874. Add notifyLeaderReady function in IStateMachine (apache/ratis#906)
- RATIS-1897. Make TransactionContext available in DataApi.write(..). (apache/ratis#930)
- New Configuration Properties
- RATIS-1862. Add the parameter whether to take Snapshot when stopping to adapt to different services (apache/ratis#896)
- RATIS-1930. Add a conf for enable/disable majority-add. (apache/ratis#961)
- RATIS-1918. Introduces parameters that separately control the shutdown of RaftServerProxy by JVMPauseMonitor. (apache/ratis#950)
- RATIS-1636. Support re-config ratis properties (apache/ratis#800)
- RATIS-1860. Add ratis-shell cmd to generate a new raft-meta.conf. (apache/ratis#901)
- Improvements & Bug Fixes
- Netty
- RATIS-1898. Netty should use EpollEventLoopGroup by default (apache/ratis#931)
- RATIS-1899. Use EpollEventLoopGroup for Netty Proxies (apache/ratis#932)
- RATIS-1921. Shared worker group in WorkerGroupGetter should be closed. (apache/ratis#955)
- RATIS-1923. Netty: atomic operations require side-effect-free functions. (apache/ratis#956)
- RaftServer
- RATIS-1924. Increase the default of raft.server.log.segment.size.max. (apache/ratis#957)
- RATIS-1892. Unify the lifetime of the RaftServerProxy thread pool (apache/ratis#923)
- RATIS-1889. NoSuchMethodError: RaftServerMetricsImpl.addNumPendingRequestsGauge apache/ratis#922 (apache/ratis#922)
- RATIS-761. Handle writeStateMachineData failure in leader. (apache/ratis#927)
- RATIS-1902. The snapshot index is set incorrectly in InstallSnapshotReplyProto. (apache/ratis#933)
- RATIS-1912. Fix infinity election when perform membership change. (apache/ratis#954)
- RATIS-1858. Follower keeps logging first election timeout. (apache/ratis#894)
- 3.0.1:This is a bugfix release. See the [changes between 3.0.0 and 3.0.1](apache/ratis@ratis-3.0.0...ratis-3.0.1) releases.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Cluster manual test.
Closes#2480 from SteNicholas/CELEBORN-1400.
Authored-by: SteNicholas <programgeek@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuang <lvshuang.xjs@alibaba-inc.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@SzyWilliam@tisonkun@szetszwo
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' RATIS-1882. Support read-after-write consistency by SzyWilliam · Pull Request #913 · apache/ratis · GitHub
Skip to content

RATIS-1882. Support read-after-write consistency - #913

Merged
szetszwo merged 5 commits into
apache:masterfrom
SzyWilliam:jira1882
Sep 5, 2023
Merged

RATIS-1882. Support read-after-write consistency#913
szetszwo merged 5 commits into
apache:masterfrom
SzyWilliam:jira1882

Conversation

@SzyWilliam

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Support read-after-write consistency.
Thanks @szetszwo very much for the patch. Only made minor changes and added unit tests to the patch.

What is the link to the Apache JIRA

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-1882

How was this patch tested?

New unit tests.

@szetszwoszetszwo left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 the change looks good. Just a very minor comment inlined.

Also, spent some time to add another unit test; see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/13062665/TestReadAfterWrite.patch
Could you include it?

Comment on lines +62 to +65
final CompletableFuture<Long> future = ref != null? ref.get(): null;
if (future != null) {
return future;
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just found that these few lines can be simplified as below.

if (ref != null) {
returnref.get();
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done


@Override
public CompletableFuture<RaftClientReply> sendReadAfterWrite(Message message) {
return send(RaftClientRequest.readAfterWriteConsistentRequestType(), message, null);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@SzyWilliam , Should sendReadAfterWrite use UnorderedAsync.send(..)? Indeed, all the linearizable reads should use UnorderedAsync.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's true! Thanks for pointing out, I'll change all the linearizable reads to use UnorderedAsync

@SzyWilliam

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@szetszwo Thanks very much for the patch! It's good to know CodeInjectionForTesting can be used for blocking. I'll try using Injection to replace the sleep time in the linearizable read index tests.

@szetszwoszetszwo left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's use OrderedAsync due to the test failure. Could you also include the following?

diff --gita/ratis-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ratis/protocol/RaftClientRequest.javab/ratis-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ratis/protocol/RaftClientRequest.javaindex4b0c5166..220694ce100644
--- a/ratis-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ratis/protocol/RaftClientRequest.java
+++ b/ratis-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ratis/protocol/RaftClientRequest.java@@ -227,7 +227,10@@publicclassRaftClientRequestextendsRaftClientMessage {
caseMESSAGESTREAM:
returntoString(getMessageStream());
caseREAD:
- return"RO";
+ finalReadRequestTypeProtoread = getRead();
+ returnread.getReadAfterWriteConsistent()? "RaW"
+ : read.getPreferNonLinearizable()? "RO(pNL)"
+ : "RO";
caseSTALEREAD:
return"StaleRead(" + getStaleRead().getMinIndex() + ")";
caseWATCH:
diff --gita/ratis-examples/src/test/java/org/apache/ratis/server/impl/TestReadAfterWrite.javab/ratis-examples/src/test/java/org/apache/ratis/server/impl/TestReadAfterWrite.javaindexf8f2405c..f515628c100644
--- a/ratis-examples/src/test/java/org/apache/ratis/server/impl/TestReadAfterWrite.java
+++ b/ratis-examples/src/test/java/org/apache/ratis/server/impl/TestReadAfterWrite.java@@ -128,8 +128,10@@publicclassTestReadAfterWriteLOG.info("readAfterWrite.get");
try {
// readAfterWrite should time out
- readAfterWrite.get(100, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
- Assert.fail();
+ finalRaftClientReplyreply = readAfterWrite.get(100, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
+ finalDoubleValueresult = (DoubleValue) Expression.Utils.bytes2Expression(
+ reply.getMessage().getContent().toByteArray(), 0);
+ Assert.fail("result=" + result + ", reply=" + reply);
} catch (TimeoutExceptione) {
LOG.info("Good", e);
}

@Override
public CompletableFuture<RaftClientReply> sendReadAfterWrite(Message message) {
return send(RaftClientRequest.readAfterWriteConsistentRequestType(), message, null);
return UnorderedAsync.send(RaftClientRequest.readAfterWriteConsistentRequestType(), message, null, client);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, it actually not working since UnorderedAsync use a different channel. It can arrive the server earlier than the previous write request and get a small readIndex. TestReadAfterWrite will fail.

  • Using unordered async
2023-09-04 11:16:59,888 DEBUG server.RaftServer$Division (LeaderStateImpl.java:getReadIndex(1099)) - readIndex=1, readAfterWriteConsistentIndex=1
  • Using ordered async
2023-09-04 11:11:36,917 DEBUG server.RaftServer$Division (LeaderStateImpl.java:getReadIndex(1099)) - readIndex=3, readAfterWriteConsistentIndex=3

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You are right. Just investigated on OrderedAsync and UnorderedAsync and now I know why we should choose OrderedAsync. Thanks very much for your time spent and the detailed explanation!

@szetszwo
szetszwo merged commit 88405b0 into apache:masterSep 5, 2023
Brokenice0415 pushed a commit to Brokenice0415/ratis that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2023
@tisonkun

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Cool! I'm checking this out.

@tisonkun

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

May I ask what is the target release version of this feature?

@szetszwo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We should include this to both 3.0.0 and the next branch 2 releases.

symious pushed a commit to symious/ratis that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2024
RexXiong pushed a commit to apache/celeborn that referenced this pull request May 30, 2024
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Bump Ratis version from 2.5.1 to 3.0.1. Address incompatible changes:
- RATIS-589. Eliminate buffer copying in SegmentedRaftLogOutputStream.(apache/ratis#964)
- RATIS-1677. Do not auto format RaftStorage in RECOVER.(apache/ratis#718)
- RATIS-1710. Refactor metrics api and implementation to separated modules. (apache/ratis#749)
### Why are the changes needed?
Bump Ratis version from 2.5.1 to 3.0.1. Ratis has released v3.0.0, v3.0.1, which release note refers to [3.0.0](https://ratis.apache.org/post/3.0.0.html), [3.0.1](https://ratis.apache.org/post/3.0.1.html). The 3.0.x version include new features like pluggable metrics and lease read, etc, some improvements and bugfixes including:
- 3.0.0: Change list of ratis 3.0.0 In total, there are roughly 100 commits diffing from 2.5.1 including:
- Incompatible Changes
- RaftStorage Auto-Format
- RATIS-1677. Do not auto format RaftStorage in RECOVER. (apache/ratis#718)
- RATIS-1694. Fix the compatibility issue of RATIS-1677. (apache/ratis#731)
- RATIS-1871. Auto format RaftStorage when there is only one directory configured. (apache/ratis#903)
- Pluggable Ratis-Metrics (RATIS-1688)
- RATIS-1689. Remove the use of the thirdparty Gauge. (apache/ratis#728)
- RATIS-1692. Remove the use of the thirdparty Counter. (apache/ratis#732)
- RATIS-1693. Remove the use of the thirdparty Timer. (apache/ratis#734)
- RATIS-1703. Move MetricsReporting and JvmMetrics to impl. (apache/ratis#741)
- RATIS-1704. Fix SuppressWarnings(“VisibilityModifier”) in RatisMetrics. (apache/ratis#742)
- RATIS-1710. Refactor metrics api and implementation to separated modules. (apache/ratis#749)
- RATIS-1712. Add a dropwizard 3 implementation of ratis-metrics-api. (apache/ratis#751)
- RATIS-1391. Update library dropwizard.metrics version to 4.x (apache/ratis#632)
- RATIS-1601. Use the shaded dropwizard metrics and remove the dependency (apache/ratis#671)
- Streaming Protocol Change
- RATIS-1569. Move the asyncRpcApi.sendForward(..) call to the client side. (apache/ratis#635)
- New Features
- Leader Lease (RATIS-1864)
- RATIS-1865. Add leader lease bound ratio configuration (apache/ratis#897)
- RATIS-1866. Maintain leader lease after AppendEntries (apache/ratis#898)
- RATIS-1894. Implement ReadOnly based on leader lease (apache/ratis#925)
- RATIS-1882. Support read-after-write consistency (apache/ratis#913)
- StateMachine API
- RATIS-1874. Add notifyLeaderReady function in IStateMachine (apache/ratis#906)
- RATIS-1897. Make TransactionContext available in DataApi.write(..). (apache/ratis#930)
- New Configuration Properties
- RATIS-1862. Add the parameter whether to take Snapshot when stopping to adapt to different services (apache/ratis#896)
- RATIS-1930. Add a conf for enable/disable majority-add. (apache/ratis#961)
- RATIS-1918. Introduces parameters that separately control the shutdown of RaftServerProxy by JVMPauseMonitor. (apache/ratis#950)
- RATIS-1636. Support re-config ratis properties (apache/ratis#800)
- RATIS-1860. Add ratis-shell cmd to generate a new raft-meta.conf. (apache/ratis#901)
- Improvements & Bug Fixes
- Netty
- RATIS-1898. Netty should use EpollEventLoopGroup by default (apache/ratis#931)
- RATIS-1899. Use EpollEventLoopGroup for Netty Proxies (apache/ratis#932)
- RATIS-1921. Shared worker group in WorkerGroupGetter should be closed. (apache/ratis#955)
- RATIS-1923. Netty: atomic operations require side-effect-free functions. (apache/ratis#956)
- RaftServer
- RATIS-1924. Increase the default of raft.server.log.segment.size.max. (apache/ratis#957)
- RATIS-1892. Unify the lifetime of the RaftServerProxy thread pool (apache/ratis#923)
- RATIS-1889. NoSuchMethodError: RaftServerMetricsImpl.addNumPendingRequestsGauge apache/ratis#922 (apache/ratis#922)
- RATIS-761. Handle writeStateMachineData failure in leader. (apache/ratis#927)
- RATIS-1902. The snapshot index is set incorrectly in InstallSnapshotReplyProto. (apache/ratis#933)
- RATIS-1912. Fix infinity election when perform membership change. (apache/ratis#954)
- RATIS-1858. Follower keeps logging first election timeout. (apache/ratis#894)
- 3.0.1:This is a bugfix release. See the [changes between 3.0.0 and 3.0.1](apache/ratis@ratis-3.0.0...ratis-3.0.1) releases.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Cluster manual test.
Closes#2480 from SteNicholas/CELEBORN-1400.
Authored-by: SteNicholas <programgeek@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuang <lvshuang.xjs@alibaba-inc.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@SzyWilliam@tisonkun@szetszwo
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' RATIS-1882. Support read-after-write consistency by SzyWilliam · Pull Request #913 · apache/ratis · GitHub
Skip to content

RATIS-1882. Support read-after-write consistency - #913

Merged
szetszwo merged 5 commits into
apache:masterfrom
SzyWilliam:jira1882
Sep 5, 2023
Merged

RATIS-1882. Support read-after-write consistency#913
szetszwo merged 5 commits into
apache:masterfrom
SzyWilliam:jira1882

Conversation

@SzyWilliam

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Support read-after-write consistency.
Thanks @szetszwo very much for the patch. Only made minor changes and added unit tests to the patch.

What is the link to the Apache JIRA

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-1882

How was this patch tested?

New unit tests.

@szetszwoszetszwo left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 the change looks good. Just a very minor comment inlined.

Also, spent some time to add another unit test; see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/13062665/TestReadAfterWrite.patch
Could you include it?

Comment on lines +62 to +65
final CompletableFuture<Long> future = ref != null? ref.get(): null;
if (future != null) {
return future;
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just found that these few lines can be simplified as below.

if (ref != null) {
returnref.get();
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done


@Override
public CompletableFuture<RaftClientReply> sendReadAfterWrite(Message message) {
return send(RaftClientRequest.readAfterWriteConsistentRequestType(), message, null);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@SzyWilliam , Should sendReadAfterWrite use UnorderedAsync.send(..)? Indeed, all the linearizable reads should use UnorderedAsync.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's true! Thanks for pointing out, I'll change all the linearizable reads to use UnorderedAsync

@SzyWilliam

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@szetszwo Thanks very much for the patch! It's good to know CodeInjectionForTesting can be used for blocking. I'll try using Injection to replace the sleep time in the linearizable read index tests.

@szetszwoszetszwo left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's use OrderedAsync due to the test failure. Could you also include the following?

diff --gita/ratis-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ratis/protocol/RaftClientRequest.javab/ratis-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ratis/protocol/RaftClientRequest.javaindex4b0c5166..220694ce100644
--- a/ratis-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ratis/protocol/RaftClientRequest.java
+++ b/ratis-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ratis/protocol/RaftClientRequest.java@@ -227,7 +227,10@@publicclassRaftClientRequestextendsRaftClientMessage {
caseMESSAGESTREAM:
returntoString(getMessageStream());
caseREAD:
- return"RO";
+ finalReadRequestTypeProtoread = getRead();
+ returnread.getReadAfterWriteConsistent()? "RaW"
+ : read.getPreferNonLinearizable()? "RO(pNL)"
+ : "RO";
caseSTALEREAD:
return"StaleRead(" + getStaleRead().getMinIndex() + ")";
caseWATCH:
diff --gita/ratis-examples/src/test/java/org/apache/ratis/server/impl/TestReadAfterWrite.javab/ratis-examples/src/test/java/org/apache/ratis/server/impl/TestReadAfterWrite.javaindexf8f2405c..f515628c100644
--- a/ratis-examples/src/test/java/org/apache/ratis/server/impl/TestReadAfterWrite.java
+++ b/ratis-examples/src/test/java/org/apache/ratis/server/impl/TestReadAfterWrite.java@@ -128,8 +128,10@@publicclassTestReadAfterWriteLOG.info("readAfterWrite.get");
try {
// readAfterWrite should time out
- readAfterWrite.get(100, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
- Assert.fail();
+ finalRaftClientReplyreply = readAfterWrite.get(100, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
+ finalDoubleValueresult = (DoubleValue) Expression.Utils.bytes2Expression(
+ reply.getMessage().getContent().toByteArray(), 0);
+ Assert.fail("result=" + result + ", reply=" + reply);
} catch (TimeoutExceptione) {
LOG.info("Good", e);
}

@Override
public CompletableFuture<RaftClientReply> sendReadAfterWrite(Message message) {
return send(RaftClientRequest.readAfterWriteConsistentRequestType(), message, null);
return UnorderedAsync.send(RaftClientRequest.readAfterWriteConsistentRequestType(), message, null, client);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, it actually not working since UnorderedAsync use a different channel. It can arrive the server earlier than the previous write request and get a small readIndex. TestReadAfterWrite will fail.

  • Using unordered async
2023-09-04 11:16:59,888 DEBUG server.RaftServer$Division (LeaderStateImpl.java:getReadIndex(1099)) - readIndex=1, readAfterWriteConsistentIndex=1
  • Using ordered async
2023-09-04 11:11:36,917 DEBUG server.RaftServer$Division (LeaderStateImpl.java:getReadIndex(1099)) - readIndex=3, readAfterWriteConsistentIndex=3

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You are right. Just investigated on OrderedAsync and UnorderedAsync and now I know why we should choose OrderedAsync. Thanks very much for your time spent and the detailed explanation!

@szetszwo
szetszwo merged commit 88405b0 into apache:masterSep 5, 2023
Brokenice0415 pushed a commit to Brokenice0415/ratis that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2023
@tisonkun

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Cool! I'm checking this out.

@tisonkun

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

May I ask what is the target release version of this feature?

@szetszwo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We should include this to both 3.0.0 and the next branch 2 releases.

symious pushed a commit to symious/ratis that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2024
RexXiong pushed a commit to apache/celeborn that referenced this pull request May 30, 2024
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Bump Ratis version from 2.5.1 to 3.0.1. Address incompatible changes:
- RATIS-589. Eliminate buffer copying in SegmentedRaftLogOutputStream.(apache/ratis#964)
- RATIS-1677. Do not auto format RaftStorage in RECOVER.(apache/ratis#718)
- RATIS-1710. Refactor metrics api and implementation to separated modules. (apache/ratis#749)
### Why are the changes needed?
Bump Ratis version from 2.5.1 to 3.0.1. Ratis has released v3.0.0, v3.0.1, which release note refers to [3.0.0](https://ratis.apache.org/post/3.0.0.html), [3.0.1](https://ratis.apache.org/post/3.0.1.html). The 3.0.x version include new features like pluggable metrics and lease read, etc, some improvements and bugfixes including:
- 3.0.0: Change list of ratis 3.0.0 In total, there are roughly 100 commits diffing from 2.5.1 including:
- Incompatible Changes
- RaftStorage Auto-Format
- RATIS-1677. Do not auto format RaftStorage in RECOVER. (apache/ratis#718)
- RATIS-1694. Fix the compatibility issue of RATIS-1677. (apache/ratis#731)
- RATIS-1871. Auto format RaftStorage when there is only one directory configured. (apache/ratis#903)
- Pluggable Ratis-Metrics (RATIS-1688)
- RATIS-1689. Remove the use of the thirdparty Gauge. (apache/ratis#728)
- RATIS-1692. Remove the use of the thirdparty Counter. (apache/ratis#732)
- RATIS-1693. Remove the use of the thirdparty Timer. (apache/ratis#734)
- RATIS-1703. Move MetricsReporting and JvmMetrics to impl. (apache/ratis#741)
- RATIS-1704. Fix SuppressWarnings(“VisibilityModifier”) in RatisMetrics. (apache/ratis#742)
- RATIS-1710. Refactor metrics api and implementation to separated modules. (apache/ratis#749)
- RATIS-1712. Add a dropwizard 3 implementation of ratis-metrics-api. (apache/ratis#751)
- RATIS-1391. Update library dropwizard.metrics version to 4.x (apache/ratis#632)
- RATIS-1601. Use the shaded dropwizard metrics and remove the dependency (apache/ratis#671)
- Streaming Protocol Change
- RATIS-1569. Move the asyncRpcApi.sendForward(..) call to the client side. (apache/ratis#635)
- New Features
- Leader Lease (RATIS-1864)
- RATIS-1865. Add leader lease bound ratio configuration (apache/ratis#897)
- RATIS-1866. Maintain leader lease after AppendEntries (apache/ratis#898)
- RATIS-1894. Implement ReadOnly based on leader lease (apache/ratis#925)
- RATIS-1882. Support read-after-write consistency (apache/ratis#913)
- StateMachine API
- RATIS-1874. Add notifyLeaderReady function in IStateMachine (apache/ratis#906)
- RATIS-1897. Make TransactionContext available in DataApi.write(..). (apache/ratis#930)
- New Configuration Properties
- RATIS-1862. Add the parameter whether to take Snapshot when stopping to adapt to different services (apache/ratis#896)
- RATIS-1930. Add a conf for enable/disable majority-add. (apache/ratis#961)
- RATIS-1918. Introduces parameters that separately control the shutdown of RaftServerProxy by JVMPauseMonitor. (apache/ratis#950)
- RATIS-1636. Support re-config ratis properties (apache/ratis#800)
- RATIS-1860. Add ratis-shell cmd to generate a new raft-meta.conf. (apache/ratis#901)
- Improvements & Bug Fixes
- Netty
- RATIS-1898. Netty should use EpollEventLoopGroup by default (apache/ratis#931)
- RATIS-1899. Use EpollEventLoopGroup for Netty Proxies (apache/ratis#932)
- RATIS-1921. Shared worker group in WorkerGroupGetter should be closed. (apache/ratis#955)
- RATIS-1923. Netty: atomic operations require side-effect-free functions. (apache/ratis#956)
- RaftServer
- RATIS-1924. Increase the default of raft.server.log.segment.size.max. (apache/ratis#957)
- RATIS-1892. Unify the lifetime of the RaftServerProxy thread pool (apache/ratis#923)
- RATIS-1889. NoSuchMethodError: RaftServerMetricsImpl.addNumPendingRequestsGauge apache/ratis#922 (apache/ratis#922)
- RATIS-761. Handle writeStateMachineData failure in leader. (apache/ratis#927)
- RATIS-1902. The snapshot index is set incorrectly in InstallSnapshotReplyProto. (apache/ratis#933)
- RATIS-1912. Fix infinity election when perform membership change. (apache/ratis#954)
- RATIS-1858. Follower keeps logging first election timeout. (apache/ratis#894)
- 3.0.1:This is a bugfix release. See the [changes between 3.0.0 and 3.0.1](apache/ratis@ratis-3.0.0...ratis-3.0.1) releases.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Cluster manual test.
Closes#2480 from SteNicholas/CELEBORN-1400.
Authored-by: SteNicholas <programgeek@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuang <lvshuang.xjs@alibaba-inc.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@SzyWilliam@tisonkun@szetszwo
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); RATIS-1882. Support read-after-write consistency by SzyWilliam · Pull Request #913 · apache/ratis · GitHub
Skip to content

RATIS-1882. Support read-after-write consistency - #913

Merged
szetszwo merged 5 commits into
apache:masterfrom
SzyWilliam:jira1882
Sep 5, 2023
Merged

RATIS-1882. Support read-after-write consistency#913
szetszwo merged 5 commits into
apache:masterfrom
SzyWilliam:jira1882

Conversation

@SzyWilliam

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Support read-after-write consistency.
Thanks @szetszwo very much for the patch. Only made minor changes and added unit tests to the patch.

What is the link to the Apache JIRA

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-1882

How was this patch tested?

New unit tests.

@szetszwoszetszwo left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 the change looks good. Just a very minor comment inlined.

Also, spent some time to add another unit test; see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/13062665/TestReadAfterWrite.patch
Could you include it?

Comment on lines +62 to +65
final CompletableFuture<Long> future = ref != null? ref.get(): null;
if (future != null) {
return future;
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just found that these few lines can be simplified as below.

if (ref != null) {
returnref.get();
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done


@Override
public CompletableFuture<RaftClientReply> sendReadAfterWrite(Message message) {
return send(RaftClientRequest.readAfterWriteConsistentRequestType(), message, null);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@SzyWilliam , Should sendReadAfterWrite use UnorderedAsync.send(..)? Indeed, all the linearizable reads should use UnorderedAsync.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's true! Thanks for pointing out, I'll change all the linearizable reads to use UnorderedAsync

@SzyWilliam

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@szetszwo Thanks very much for the patch! It's good to know CodeInjectionForTesting can be used for blocking. I'll try using Injection to replace the sleep time in the linearizable read index tests.

@szetszwoszetszwo left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's use OrderedAsync due to the test failure. Could you also include the following?

diff --gita/ratis-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ratis/protocol/RaftClientRequest.javab/ratis-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ratis/protocol/RaftClientRequest.javaindex4b0c5166..220694ce100644
--- a/ratis-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ratis/protocol/RaftClientRequest.java
+++ b/ratis-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ratis/protocol/RaftClientRequest.java@@ -227,7 +227,10@@publicclassRaftClientRequestextendsRaftClientMessage {
caseMESSAGESTREAM:
returntoString(getMessageStream());
caseREAD:
- return"RO";
+ finalReadRequestTypeProtoread = getRead();
+ returnread.getReadAfterWriteConsistent()? "RaW"
+ : read.getPreferNonLinearizable()? "RO(pNL)"
+ : "RO";
caseSTALEREAD:
return"StaleRead(" + getStaleRead().getMinIndex() + ")";
caseWATCH:
diff --gita/ratis-examples/src/test/java/org/apache/ratis/server/impl/TestReadAfterWrite.javab/ratis-examples/src/test/java/org/apache/ratis/server/impl/TestReadAfterWrite.javaindexf8f2405c..f515628c100644
--- a/ratis-examples/src/test/java/org/apache/ratis/server/impl/TestReadAfterWrite.java
+++ b/ratis-examples/src/test/java/org/apache/ratis/server/impl/TestReadAfterWrite.java@@ -128,8 +128,10@@publicclassTestReadAfterWriteLOG.info("readAfterWrite.get");
try {
// readAfterWrite should time out
- readAfterWrite.get(100, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
- Assert.fail();
+ finalRaftClientReplyreply = readAfterWrite.get(100, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
+ finalDoubleValueresult = (DoubleValue) Expression.Utils.bytes2Expression(
+ reply.getMessage().getContent().toByteArray(), 0);
+ Assert.fail("result=" + result + ", reply=" + reply);
} catch (TimeoutExceptione) {
LOG.info("Good", e);
}

@Override
public CompletableFuture<RaftClientReply> sendReadAfterWrite(Message message) {
return send(RaftClientRequest.readAfterWriteConsistentRequestType(), message, null);
return UnorderedAsync.send(RaftClientRequest.readAfterWriteConsistentRequestType(), message, null, client);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, it actually not working since UnorderedAsync use a different channel. It can arrive the server earlier than the previous write request and get a small readIndex. TestReadAfterWrite will fail.

  • Using unordered async
2023-09-04 11:16:59,888 DEBUG server.RaftServer$Division (LeaderStateImpl.java:getReadIndex(1099)) - readIndex=1, readAfterWriteConsistentIndex=1
  • Using ordered async
2023-09-04 11:11:36,917 DEBUG server.RaftServer$Division (LeaderStateImpl.java:getReadIndex(1099)) - readIndex=3, readAfterWriteConsistentIndex=3

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You are right. Just investigated on OrderedAsync and UnorderedAsync and now I know why we should choose OrderedAsync. Thanks very much for your time spent and the detailed explanation!

@szetszwo
szetszwo merged commit 88405b0 into apache:masterSep 5, 2023
Brokenice0415 pushed a commit to Brokenice0415/ratis that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2023
@tisonkun

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Cool! I'm checking this out.

@tisonkun

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

May I ask what is the target release version of this feature?

@szetszwo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We should include this to both 3.0.0 and the next branch 2 releases.

symious pushed a commit to symious/ratis that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2024
RexXiong pushed a commit to apache/celeborn that referenced this pull request May 30, 2024
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Bump Ratis version from 2.5.1 to 3.0.1. Address incompatible changes:
- RATIS-589. Eliminate buffer copying in SegmentedRaftLogOutputStream.(apache/ratis#964)
- RATIS-1677. Do not auto format RaftStorage in RECOVER.(apache/ratis#718)
- RATIS-1710. Refactor metrics api and implementation to separated modules. (apache/ratis#749)
### Why are the changes needed?
Bump Ratis version from 2.5.1 to 3.0.1. Ratis has released v3.0.0, v3.0.1, which release note refers to [3.0.0](https://ratis.apache.org/post/3.0.0.html), [3.0.1](https://ratis.apache.org/post/3.0.1.html). The 3.0.x version include new features like pluggable metrics and lease read, etc, some improvements and bugfixes including:
- 3.0.0: Change list of ratis 3.0.0 In total, there are roughly 100 commits diffing from 2.5.1 including:
- Incompatible Changes
- RaftStorage Auto-Format
- RATIS-1677. Do not auto format RaftStorage in RECOVER. (apache/ratis#718)
- RATIS-1694. Fix the compatibility issue of RATIS-1677. (apache/ratis#731)
- RATIS-1871. Auto format RaftStorage when there is only one directory configured. (apache/ratis#903)
- Pluggable Ratis-Metrics (RATIS-1688)
- RATIS-1689. Remove the use of the thirdparty Gauge. (apache/ratis#728)
- RATIS-1692. Remove the use of the thirdparty Counter. (apache/ratis#732)
- RATIS-1693. Remove the use of the thirdparty Timer. (apache/ratis#734)
- RATIS-1703. Move MetricsReporting and JvmMetrics to impl. (apache/ratis#741)
- RATIS-1704. Fix SuppressWarnings(“VisibilityModifier”) in RatisMetrics. (apache/ratis#742)
- RATIS-1710. Refactor metrics api and implementation to separated modules. (apache/ratis#749)
- RATIS-1712. Add a dropwizard 3 implementation of ratis-metrics-api. (apache/ratis#751)
- RATIS-1391. Update library dropwizard.metrics version to 4.x (apache/ratis#632)
- RATIS-1601. Use the shaded dropwizard metrics and remove the dependency (apache/ratis#671)
- Streaming Protocol Change
- RATIS-1569. Move the asyncRpcApi.sendForward(..) call to the client side. (apache/ratis#635)
- New Features
- Leader Lease (RATIS-1864)
- RATIS-1865. Add leader lease bound ratio configuration (apache/ratis#897)
- RATIS-1866. Maintain leader lease after AppendEntries (apache/ratis#898)
- RATIS-1894. Implement ReadOnly based on leader lease (apache/ratis#925)
- RATIS-1882. Support read-after-write consistency (apache/ratis#913)
- StateMachine API
- RATIS-1874. Add notifyLeaderReady function in IStateMachine (apache/ratis#906)
- RATIS-1897. Make TransactionContext available in DataApi.write(..). (apache/ratis#930)
- New Configuration Properties
- RATIS-1862. Add the parameter whether to take Snapshot when stopping to adapt to different services (apache/ratis#896)
- RATIS-1930. Add a conf for enable/disable majority-add. (apache/ratis#961)
- RATIS-1918. Introduces parameters that separately control the shutdown of RaftServerProxy by JVMPauseMonitor. (apache/ratis#950)
- RATIS-1636. Support re-config ratis properties (apache/ratis#800)
- RATIS-1860. Add ratis-shell cmd to generate a new raft-meta.conf. (apache/ratis#901)
- Improvements & Bug Fixes
- Netty
- RATIS-1898. Netty should use EpollEventLoopGroup by default (apache/ratis#931)
- RATIS-1899. Use EpollEventLoopGroup for Netty Proxies (apache/ratis#932)
- RATIS-1921. Shared worker group in WorkerGroupGetter should be closed. (apache/ratis#955)
- RATIS-1923. Netty: atomic operations require side-effect-free functions. (apache/ratis#956)
- RaftServer
- RATIS-1924. Increase the default of raft.server.log.segment.size.max. (apache/ratis#957)
- RATIS-1892. Unify the lifetime of the RaftServerProxy thread pool (apache/ratis#923)
- RATIS-1889. NoSuchMethodError: RaftServerMetricsImpl.addNumPendingRequestsGauge apache/ratis#922 (apache/ratis#922)
- RATIS-761. Handle writeStateMachineData failure in leader. (apache/ratis#927)
- RATIS-1902. The snapshot index is set incorrectly in InstallSnapshotReplyProto. (apache/ratis#933)
- RATIS-1912. Fix infinity election when perform membership change. (apache/ratis#954)
- RATIS-1858. Follower keeps logging first election timeout. (apache/ratis#894)
- 3.0.1:This is a bugfix release. See the [changes between 3.0.0 and 3.0.1](apache/ratis@ratis-3.0.0...ratis-3.0.1) releases.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Cluster manual test.
Closes#2480 from SteNicholas/CELEBORN-1400.
Authored-by: SteNicholas <programgeek@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuang <lvshuang.xjs@alibaba-inc.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@SzyWilliam@tisonkun@szetszwo