Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
[SPARK-18872][SQL][TESTS] New test cases for EXISTS subquery (Joins + CTE) - #16802
Closed
dilipbiswal wants to merge 2 commits into
Closed
[SPARK-18872][SQL][TESTS] New test cases for EXISTS subquery (Joins + CTE)#16802dilipbiswal wants to merge 2 commits into
dilipbiswal wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
SparkQA
commented
Feb 4, 2017
Test build #72363 has started for PR 16802 at commit |
hvanhovell
commented
Feb 4, 2017
Contributor
Retest this please |
SparkQA
commented
Feb 4, 2017
Test build #72367 has finished for PR 16802 at commit
|
nsyca
reviewed
Feb 4, 2017
| emp 3 300.0 | ||
| emp 4 100.0 | ||
| emp 5 1000.0 | ||
| emp 6 - no dept 500.0 |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I have verified the answer sets in this file match with the ones in DB2.
| 500 emp 5 2001-01-01 400.0 NULL | ||
| 600 emp 6 - no dept 2001-01-01 400.0 100 | ||
| 700 emp 7 2010-01-01 400.0 100 | ||
| 800 emp 8 2016-01-01 150.0 70 |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I have verified the answer sets in this file match with the ones in DB2.
| FROM dept | ||
| WHERE dept_id >= 30 | ||
| AND dept_id <= 50); | ||
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hi, @dilipbiswal .
Can we have another test case, TC.02.05, here for UNION instead of UNION ALL?
ContributorAuthor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@dongjoon-hyun Thanks !! I have added the UNION test case. I have also uploaded the updated db2 result file.
SparkQA
commented
Feb 5, 2017
Test build #72415 has finished for PR 16802 at commit
|
dilipbiswal
commented
Feb 13, 2017
ContributorAuthor
cc @hvanhovell@gatorsmile |
hvanhovell
commented
Feb 15, 2017
Contributor
LGTM - merging to master. |
dilipbiswal
commented
Feb 15, 2017
ContributorAuthor
@hvanhovell Thank you very much Herman !! |
cmonkey pushed a commit
to cmonkey/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 16, 2017
… CTE) ## What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR adds the third and final set of tests for EXISTS subquery. File name | Brief description ------------------------| ----------------- exists-cte.sql |Tests Exist subqueries referencing CTE exists-joins-and-set-ops.sql|Tests Exists subquery used in Joins (Both when joins occurs in outer and suquery blocks) DB2 results are attached here as reference : [exists-cte-db2.txt](https://github.com/apache/spark/files/752091/exists-cte-db2.txt) [exists-joins-and-set-ops-db2.txt](https://github.com/apache/spark/files/753283/exists-joins-and-set-ops-db2.txt) (updated) ## How was this patch tested? The test result is compared with the result run from another SQL engine (in this case is IBM DB2). If the result are equivalent, we assume the result is correct. Author: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com> Closesapache#16802 from dilipbiswal/exists-pr3.
asfgit pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 14, 2017
…ll up to Optimizer phase ## What changes were proposed in this pull request? Currently Analyzer as part of ResolveSubquery, pulls up the correlated predicates to its originating SubqueryExpression. The subquery plan is then transformed to remove the correlated predicates after they are moved up to the outer plan. In this PR, the task of pulling up correlated predicates is deferred to Optimizer. This is the initial work that will allow us to support the form of correlated subqueries that we don't support today. The design document from nsyca can be found in the following link : [DesignDoc](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QDZ8JwU63RwGFS6KVF54Rjj9ZJyK33d49ZWbjFBaIgU/edit#) The brief description of code changes (hopefully to aid with code review) can be be found in the following link: [CodeChanges](https://docs.google.com/document/d/18mqjhL9V1An-tNta7aVE13HkALRZ5GZ24AATA-Vqqf0/edit#) ## How was this patch tested? The test case PRs were submitted earlier using. [16337](#16337) [16759](#16759) [16841](#16841) [16915](#16915) [16798](#16798) [16712](#16712) [16710](#16710) [16760](#16760) [16802](#16802) Author: Dilip Biswal <dbiswal@us.ibm.com> Closes#16954 from dilipbiswal/SPARK-18874.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds the third and final set of tests for EXISTS subquery.
DB2 results are attached here as reference :
exists-cte-db2.txt
exists-joins-and-set-ops-db2.txt (updated)
How was this patch tested?
The test result is compared with the result run from another SQL engine (in this case is IBM DB2). If the result are equivalent, we assume the result is correct.