Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
[WIP][SPARK-30194][BUILD][test-maven] Re-enable checkstyle for Java - #26820
[WIP][SPARK-30194][BUILD][test-maven] Re-enable checkstyle for Java#26820dongjoon-hyun wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
srowen
commented
Dec 9, 2019
Sure, but, heh does it actually pass right now? |
Yes. |
dongjoon-hyun
commented
Dec 9, 2019
Oh, let me check the build-error part once more. |
SparkQA
commented
Dec 9, 2019
Test build #115047 has finished for PR 26820 at commit
|
dongjoon-hyun
commented
Dec 9, 2019
Retest this please. |
HeartSaVioR
commented
Dec 9, 2019
Btw, I'm feeling that it might be too strict to throw error on unused imports; as it could happen when multiple PRs modify the same file. Scala checkstyle doesn't throw error on unused imports, right? |
dongjoon-hyun
commented
Dec 9, 2019
Ya. That's a good point. Let me think about that, too. |
HyukjinKwon
commented
Dec 10, 2019
We enabled checkstyle in PR builder via #21399. So does this PR only apply when PR has the title |
| <version>3.1.0</version> | ||
| <configuration> | ||
| <failOnViolation>false</failOnViolation> | ||
| <failOnViolation>true</failOnViolation> |
SparkQA
commented
Dec 10, 2019
Test build #115050 has finished for PR 26820 at commit
|
dongjoon-hyun
commented
Dec 10, 2019
Hi, All. Thank you for review. We had better remove the |
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to prevent Java checkstyle violation.
Why are the changes needed?
Historically, we disabled this because there was no way to check this in PR Builder (9b98aef).
However, now we have
GitHub Actionwhich do this every PR.Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
How was this patch tested?
Manually.