Skip to content

SPARK-2168 [Spark core] Use relative URIs for the app links in the History Server. - #4778

Closed
elyast wants to merge 3 commits into
apache:masterfrom
elyast:master
Closed

SPARK-2168 [Spark core] Use relative URIs for the app links in the History Server.#4778
elyast wants to merge 3 commits into
apache:masterfrom
elyast:master

Conversation

@elyast

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

As agreed in PR #1160 adding test to verify if history server generates relative links to applications.

@AmplabJenkins

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@srowen

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

ok to test

@SparkQA

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Test build #27998 has started for PR 4778 at commit 6d7866d.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Test build #27998 has finished for PR 4778 at commit 6d7866d.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds the following public classes (experimental):
    • class HistoryServerSuite extends FunSuite with Matchers with MockitoSugar

@AmplabJenkins

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27998/
Test PASSed.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A bunch of little style nits: The indentation is off by one here. Also I think the imports could be ordered, with scala import first and separated by a line. Fix the extra space in true ) above. Don't we need to import postfixOps to avoid a compiler warning? Do the historyServer and request have to be members?

Otherwise this looks just fine as a follow-on test.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I compare indentation with FsHistoryProviderSuite and imho its the same, imports will do.
I don't think postfixOps is actually needed here. I will make historyServer and request local variables.

@SparkQA

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Test build #28047 has started for PR 4778 at commit 0c07fab.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Test build #28047 has finished for PR 4778 at commit 0c07fab.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds the following public classes (experimental):
    • class HistoryServerSuite extends FunSuite with Matchers with MockitoSugar

@AmplabJenkins

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28047/
Test PASSed.

@andrewor14

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Ok LGTM merging into master 1.3 thanks @elyast

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2015
…story Server.
As agreed in PR #1160 adding test to verify if history server generates relative links to applications.
Author: Lukasz Jastrzebski <lukasz.jastrzebski@gmail.com>
Closes#4778 from elyast/master and squashes the following commits:
0c07fab [Lukasz Jastrzebski] Incorporating comments for SPARK-21686d7866d [Lukasz Jastrzebski] Adjusting test for SPARK-2168 for master branch
d6f4fbe [Lukasz Jastrzebski] Added test for SPARK-2168
(cherry picked from commit 4a8a0a8)
Signed-off-by: Andrew Or <andrew@databricks.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@elyast@AmplabJenkins@srowen@SparkQA@andrewor14