Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
TEZ-4387: use new doclet API in Java 9+ - #187
Conversation
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
| <id>jdk9plus</id> | ||
| <activation> | ||
| <!-- JDK9 starts strong encapsulation of Java internals, JDK17 removes/hides those --> | ||
| <jdk>[9,9999)</jdk> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
which version does this expression target?
if every version starting with "9", then a simply "9" should work
https://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-profiles.html
The following configuration will trigger the profile when the JDK's version starts with "1.4" (eg. "1.4.0_08", "1.4.2_07", "1.4"):
<profiles>
<profile>
<activation>
<jdk>1.4</jdk>
</activation>
...
</profile>
</profiles>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is a range of versions, based on https://maven.apache.org/enforcer/enforcer-rules/versionRanges.html I wanted to write for JDK version 9 and up: <jdk>[9,)</jdk>
It also could be 17 and up as only 17 enforces the new API.
abstractdog
commented
Feb 18, 2022
left some comments |
| @Override | ||
| public String getName() { | ||
| return "Example"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
where is this name used? is there a chance for a better name?
in case of no idea, I guess "Tez" would make do :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's from the JDK sample code. I had to implement the method. Good catch, I totally forgot to update it for the current project.
LA-Toth
commented
Feb 22, 2022
It seems that in JDK 11 the documentation generation is quite buggy, which is a known issue and fixed in JDK 13. With Java 17 the documentation was generated successfully and believable, so I go further with the JDK17-only version. |
24860be to
cd507aaCompare
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
abstractdog
commented
Nov 17, 2022
@LA-Toth: is there any pending work on this PR I can help with? |
LA-Toth
commented
Nov 22, 2022
I had only one problem, the tests are too strict and cannot handle properly my solution. So I always get -1 for something. I don't think it's an error in my PR, I can't do anything. |
abstractdog
commented
Nov 26, 2022
okay thanks, let me take a look next week |
e0a4723 to
618422dCompare
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
abstractdog
commented
Jun 23, 2023
LA-Toth
commented
Jun 23, 2023
It works with JDK 11, as I see, at least locally. I just missed the version bump in |
tez-yetus
commented
Jun 23, 2023
💔 -1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
this is strange, I wanted to test by building locally, but I can see that in jdk8 the problematic module is not included at all: I expected tez-javadoc-tools-base-jdk8 to be included |
abstractdog
commented
Dec 23, 2024
currently working on this in the scope of #296 |
abstractdog
commented
Dec 30, 2024
merged as #296 |
No description provided.