Existing session - #209

Closed
brunobeltran wants to merge 7 commits into
arokem:masterfrom
brunobeltran:existing-session
Closed

Existing session#209
brunobeltran wants to merge 7 commits into
arokem:masterfrom
brunobeltran:existing-session

Conversation

@brunobeltran

@brunobeltranbrunobeltran commented Aug 25, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

PR Contains:

  1. Preliminary solution to Issue Connect to an already running Matlab instance instead of making one #196.
  2. Reorganization of code to facilitate Matlab scripts that use pymatbridge to call Python functions. Separation of concerns (moving _preamble_code to matlabserver helper functions) is how I think the solution to clear potential hang conditions #13 should look.
  3. Replaced all "print" and *.write() statements with configurable logging.
  4. Tried to update code comments that were out of date.

The new convention for connecting to Matlab is that

lab = Matlab(executable=something, ...)

follows the old behavior, while

lab = Matlab(executable=None, socket_addr='ipc:///something', ...)

connects to a Matlab sessions where the matlabserver.m function is being executed.

The only thing I'm having trouble getting to work is the new "separate" command, designed for when you've started a Matlab session via Matlab(executable=matlab).start() and later decide that what you need to do requires (or would just be nicer) if you were to drop into Matlab proper without having to save, exit, and reload the workspace. Combined with the ability to dynamically connect to Matlab, this could facilitate workflows that involve actively switching back and forth.

On my box, calling something like
lab = Matlab()
lab.start()
lab.separate()
opens the Matlab desktop GUI, as expected, but the ZMQ socket and context closing messages are mysteriously printed twice, and the GUI eventually exists without becoming available for use. Any ideas here?

@brunobeltran

brunobeltran commented Aug 25, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Man, it must have been really late when I made the pull request. Problem with lab.separate() was super simple. Fixed now, as well as some bug fixes in messenger.c that I missed in my half-asleep state.

@brunobeltran

brunobeltran commented Sep 11, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

rebase'd over my previous pull request, so this branch should be merge-able. Any thoughts on why it hasn't been merged, or is it just a not-enough-time thing?

@arokem

arokem commented Sep 11, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Just not-enough-time. I really want to sort out the Travis breakage on
master, before considering any more massive changes, but have been too busy
with a host of other things, and this has languished. Again - working
towards a deadline mid-next-week, but might have time to look towards the
end of the week. Sorry for the delay...

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Bruno Beltran notifications@github.com
wrote:

rebase'd over my previous pull request, so this branch should be
merge-able. Any thoughts on why it hasn't been merged, or is it just a
not-enough-time thing?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#209 (comment)
.

@arokem

arokem commented Sep 21, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Can I close this one? Looks like it's superseded by #218

@brunobeltran

brunobeltran commented Sep 21, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Oh, didn't realize I had the inf-fix stuff over this branch. Putting it all in one place sounds fine to me.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@brunobeltran@arokem
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

Skip to content
Existing session - #209
Closed
brunobeltran wants to merge 7 commits into
arokem:masterfrom 
brunobeltran:existing-session
Closed
Existing session#209
brunobeltran wants to merge 7 commits into
arokem:masterfrom 
brunobeltran:existing-session
Conversation
@brunobeltran
@brunobeltranbrunobeltran
commented
Aug 25, 2015

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
PR Contains:
  1. Preliminary solution to Issue Connect to an already running Matlab instance instead of making one #196.
  2. Reorganization of code to facilitate Matlab scripts that use pymatbridge to call Python functions. Separation of concerns (moving _preamble_code to matlabserver helper functions) is how I think the solution to clear potential hang conditions #13 should look.
  3. Replaced all "print" and *.write() statements with configurable logging.
  4. Tried to update code comments that were out of date.
The new convention for connecting to Matlab is that
lab = Matlab(executable=something, ...)

follows the old behavior, while
lab = Matlab(executable=None, socket_addr='ipc:///something', ...)

connects to a Matlab sessions where the matlabserver.m function is being executed.
The only thing I'm having trouble getting to work is the new "separate" command, designed for when you've started a Matlab session via Matlab(executable=matlab).start() and later decide that what you need to do requires (or would just be nicer) if you were to drop into Matlab proper without having to save, exit, and reload the workspace. Combined with the ability to dynamically connect to Matlab, this could facilitate workflows that involve actively switching back and forth.
On my box, calling something like

lab = Matlab()

lab.start()

lab.separate()

opens the Matlab desktop GUI, as expected, but the ZMQ socket and context closing messages are mysteriously printed twice, and the GUI eventually exists without becoming available for use. Any ideas here?
@brunobeltran
brunobeltran
commented
Aug 25, 2015

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Man, it must have been really late when I made the pull request. Problem with lab.separate() was super simple. Fixed now, as well as some bug fixes in messenger.c that I missed in my half-asleep state.
@brunobeltran
brunobeltran
commented
Sep 11, 2015

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
rebase'd over my previous pull request, so this branch should be merge-able. Any thoughts on why it hasn't been merged, or is it just a not-enough-time thing?
@arokem
arokem
commented
Sep 11, 2015

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Just not-enough-time. I really want to sort out the Travis breakage on

master, before considering any more massive changes, but have been too busy

with a host of other things, and this has languished. Again - working

towards a deadline mid-next-week, but might have time to look towards the

end of the week. Sorry for the delay...
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Bruno Beltran notifications@github.com

wrote:
rebase'd over my previous pull request, so this branch should be

merge-able. Any thoughts on why it hasn't been merged, or is it just a

not-enough-time thing?
—

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#209 (comment)

.
@arokem
arokem
commented
Sep 21, 2015

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Can I close this one? Looks like it's superseded by #218
@brunobeltran
brunobeltran
commented
Sep 21, 2015

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Oh, didn't realize I had the inf-fix stuff over this branch. Putting it all in one place sounds fine to me.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@brunobeltran@arokem

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Existing session - #209
Closed
brunobeltran wants to merge 7 commits into
arokem:masterfrom 
brunobeltran:existing-session
Closed
Existing session#209
brunobeltran wants to merge 7 commits into
arokem:masterfrom 
brunobeltran:existing-session
Conversation
@brunobeltran
@brunobeltranbrunobeltran
commented
Aug 25, 2015

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
PR Contains:
  1. Preliminary solution to Issue Connect to an already running Matlab instance instead of making one #196.
  2. Reorganization of code to facilitate Matlab scripts that use pymatbridge to call Python functions. Separation of concerns (moving _preamble_code to matlabserver helper functions) is how I think the solution to clear potential hang conditions #13 should look.
  3. Replaced all "print" and *.write() statements with configurable logging.
  4. Tried to update code comments that were out of date.
The new convention for connecting to Matlab is that
lab = Matlab(executable=something, ...)

follows the old behavior, while
lab = Matlab(executable=None, socket_addr='ipc:///something', ...)

connects to a Matlab sessions where the matlabserver.m function is being executed.
The only thing I'm having trouble getting to work is the new "separate" command, designed for when you've started a Matlab session via Matlab(executable=matlab).start() and later decide that what you need to do requires (or would just be nicer) if you were to drop into Matlab proper without having to save, exit, and reload the workspace. Combined with the ability to dynamically connect to Matlab, this could facilitate workflows that involve actively switching back and forth.
On my box, calling something like

lab = Matlab()

lab.start()

lab.separate()

opens the Matlab desktop GUI, as expected, but the ZMQ socket and context closing messages are mysteriously printed twice, and the GUI eventually exists without becoming available for use. Any ideas here?
@brunobeltran
brunobeltran
commented
Aug 25, 2015

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Man, it must have been really late when I made the pull request. Problem with lab.separate() was super simple. Fixed now, as well as some bug fixes in messenger.c that I missed in my half-asleep state.
@brunobeltran
brunobeltran
commented
Sep 11, 2015

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
rebase'd over my previous pull request, so this branch should be merge-able. Any thoughts on why it hasn't been merged, or is it just a not-enough-time thing?
@arokem
arokem
commented
Sep 11, 2015

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Just not-enough-time. I really want to sort out the Travis breakage on

master, before considering any more massive changes, but have been too busy

with a host of other things, and this has languished. Again - working

towards a deadline mid-next-week, but might have time to look towards the

end of the week. Sorry for the delay...
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Bruno Beltran notifications@github.com

wrote:
rebase'd over my previous pull request, so this branch should be

merge-able. Any thoughts on why it hasn't been merged, or is it just a

not-enough-time thing?
—

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#209 (comment)

.
@arokem
arokem
commented
Sep 21, 2015

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Can I close this one? Looks like it's superseded by #218
@brunobeltran
brunobeltran
commented
Sep 21, 2015

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Oh, didn't realize I had the inf-fix stuff over this branch. Putting it all in one place sounds fine to me.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@brunobeltran@arokem

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Existing session - #209
Closed
brunobeltran wants to merge 7 commits into
arokem:masterfrom 
brunobeltran:existing-session
Closed
Existing session#209
brunobeltran wants to merge 7 commits into
arokem:masterfrom 
brunobeltran:existing-session
Conversation
@brunobeltran
@brunobeltranbrunobeltran
commented
Aug 25, 2015

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
PR Contains:
  1. Preliminary solution to Issue Connect to an already running Matlab instance instead of making one #196.
  2. Reorganization of code to facilitate Matlab scripts that use pymatbridge to call Python functions. Separation of concerns (moving _preamble_code to matlabserver helper functions) is how I think the solution to clear potential hang conditions #13 should look.
  3. Replaced all "print" and *.write() statements with configurable logging.
  4. Tried to update code comments that were out of date.
The new convention for connecting to Matlab is that
lab = Matlab(executable=something, ...)

follows the old behavior, while
lab = Matlab(executable=None, socket_addr='ipc:///something', ...)

connects to a Matlab sessions where the matlabserver.m function is being executed.
The only thing I'm having trouble getting to work is the new "separate" command, designed for when you've started a Matlab session via Matlab(executable=matlab).start() and later decide that what you need to do requires (or would just be nicer) if you were to drop into Matlab proper without having to save, exit, and reload the workspace. Combined with the ability to dynamically connect to Matlab, this could facilitate workflows that involve actively switching back and forth.
On my box, calling something like

lab = Matlab()

lab.start()

lab.separate()

opens the Matlab desktop GUI, as expected, but the ZMQ socket and context closing messages are mysteriously printed twice, and the GUI eventually exists without becoming available for use. Any ideas here?
@brunobeltran
brunobeltran
commented
Aug 25, 2015

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Man, it must have been really late when I made the pull request. Problem with lab.separate() was super simple. Fixed now, as well as some bug fixes in messenger.c that I missed in my half-asleep state.
@brunobeltran
brunobeltran
commented
Sep 11, 2015

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
rebase'd over my previous pull request, so this branch should be merge-able. Any thoughts on why it hasn't been merged, or is it just a not-enough-time thing?
@arokem
arokem
commented
Sep 11, 2015

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Just not-enough-time. I really want to sort out the Travis breakage on

master, before considering any more massive changes, but have been too busy

with a host of other things, and this has languished. Again - working

towards a deadline mid-next-week, but might have time to look towards the

end of the week. Sorry for the delay...
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Bruno Beltran notifications@github.com

wrote:
rebase'd over my previous pull request, so this branch should be

merge-able. Any thoughts on why it hasn't been merged, or is it just a

not-enough-time thing?
—

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#209 (comment)

.
@arokem
arokem
commented
Sep 21, 2015

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Can I close this one? Looks like it's superseded by #218
@brunobeltran
brunobeltran
commented
Sep 21, 2015

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Oh, didn't realize I had the inf-fix stuff over this branch. Putting it all in one place sounds fine to me.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@brunobeltran@arokem

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

Skip to content
Existing session - #209
Closed
brunobeltran wants to merge 7 commits into
arokem:masterfrom 
brunobeltran:existing-session
Closed
Existing session#209
brunobeltran wants to merge 7 commits into
arokem:masterfrom 
brunobeltran:existing-session
Conversation
@brunobeltran
@brunobeltranbrunobeltran
commented
Aug 25, 2015

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
PR Contains:
  1. Preliminary solution to Issue Connect to an already running Matlab instance instead of making one #196.
  2. Reorganization of code to facilitate Matlab scripts that use pymatbridge to call Python functions. Separation of concerns (moving _preamble_code to matlabserver helper functions) is how I think the solution to clear potential hang conditions #13 should look.
  3. Replaced all "print" and *.write() statements with configurable logging.
  4. Tried to update code comments that were out of date.
The new convention for connecting to Matlab is that
lab = Matlab(executable=something, ...)

follows the old behavior, while
lab = Matlab(executable=None, socket_addr='ipc:///something', ...)

connects to a Matlab sessions where the matlabserver.m function is being executed.
The only thing I'm having trouble getting to work is the new "separate" command, designed for when you've started a Matlab session via Matlab(executable=matlab).start() and later decide that what you need to do requires (or would just be nicer) if you were to drop into Matlab proper without having to save, exit, and reload the workspace. Combined with the ability to dynamically connect to Matlab, this could facilitate workflows that involve actively switching back and forth.
On my box, calling something like

lab = Matlab()

lab.start()

lab.separate()

opens the Matlab desktop GUI, as expected, but the ZMQ socket and context closing messages are mysteriously printed twice, and the GUI eventually exists without becoming available for use. Any ideas here?
@brunobeltran
brunobeltran
commented
Aug 25, 2015

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Man, it must have been really late when I made the pull request. Problem with lab.separate() was super simple. Fixed now, as well as some bug fixes in messenger.c that I missed in my half-asleep state.
@brunobeltran
brunobeltran
commented
Sep 11, 2015

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
rebase'd over my previous pull request, so this branch should be merge-able. Any thoughts on why it hasn't been merged, or is it just a not-enough-time thing?
@arokem
arokem
commented
Sep 11, 2015

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Just not-enough-time. I really want to sort out the Travis breakage on

master, before considering any more massive changes, but have been too busy

with a host of other things, and this has languished. Again - working

towards a deadline mid-next-week, but might have time to look towards the

end of the week. Sorry for the delay...
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Bruno Beltran notifications@github.com

wrote:
rebase'd over my previous pull request, so this branch should be

merge-able. Any thoughts on why it hasn't been merged, or is it just a

not-enough-time thing?
—

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#209 (comment)

.
@arokem
arokem
commented
Sep 21, 2015

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Can I close this one? Looks like it's superseded by #218
@brunobeltran
brunobeltran
commented
Sep 21, 2015

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Oh, didn't realize I had the inf-fix stuff over this branch. Putting it all in one place sounds fine to me.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@brunobeltran@arokem

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Existing session - #209
Closed
brunobeltran wants to merge 7 commits into
arokem:masterfrom 
brunobeltran:existing-session
Closed
Existing session#209
brunobeltran wants to merge 7 commits into
arokem:masterfrom 
brunobeltran:existing-session
Conversation
@brunobeltran
@brunobeltranbrunobeltran
commented
Aug 25, 2015

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
PR Contains:
  1. Preliminary solution to Issue Connect to an already running Matlab instance instead of making one #196.
  2. Reorganization of code to facilitate Matlab scripts that use pymatbridge to call Python functions. Separation of concerns (moving _preamble_code to matlabserver helper functions) is how I think the solution to clear potential hang conditions #13 should look.
  3. Replaced all "print" and *.write() statements with configurable logging.
  4. Tried to update code comments that were out of date.
The new convention for connecting to Matlab is that
lab = Matlab(executable=something, ...)

follows the old behavior, while
lab = Matlab(executable=None, socket_addr='ipc:///something', ...)

connects to a Matlab sessions where the matlabserver.m function is being executed.
The only thing I'm having trouble getting to work is the new "separate" command, designed for when you've started a Matlab session via Matlab(executable=matlab).start() and later decide that what you need to do requires (or would just be nicer) if you were to drop into Matlab proper without having to save, exit, and reload the workspace. Combined with the ability to dynamically connect to Matlab, this could facilitate workflows that involve actively switching back and forth.
On my box, calling something like

lab = Matlab()

lab.start()

lab.separate()

opens the Matlab desktop GUI, as expected, but the ZMQ socket and context closing messages are mysteriously printed twice, and the GUI eventually exists without becoming available for use. Any ideas here?
@brunobeltran
brunobeltran
commented
Aug 25, 2015

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Man, it must have been really late when I made the pull request. Problem with lab.separate() was super simple. Fixed now, as well as some bug fixes in messenger.c that I missed in my half-asleep state.
@brunobeltran
brunobeltran
commented
Sep 11, 2015

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
rebase'd over my previous pull request, so this branch should be merge-able. Any thoughts on why it hasn't been merged, or is it just a not-enough-time thing?
@arokem
arokem
commented
Sep 11, 2015

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Just not-enough-time. I really want to sort out the Travis breakage on

master, before considering any more massive changes, but have been too busy

with a host of other things, and this has languished. Again - working

towards a deadline mid-next-week, but might have time to look towards the

end of the week. Sorry for the delay...
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Bruno Beltran notifications@github.com

wrote:
rebase'd over my previous pull request, so this branch should be

merge-able. Any thoughts on why it hasn't been merged, or is it just a

not-enough-time thing?
—

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#209 (comment)

.
@arokem
arokem
commented
Sep 21, 2015

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Can I close this one? Looks like it's superseded by #218
@brunobeltran
brunobeltran
commented
Sep 21, 2015

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Oh, didn't realize I had the inf-fix stuff over this branch. Putting it all in one place sounds fine to me.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@brunobeltran@arokem

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Existing session - #209
Closed
brunobeltran wants to merge 7 commits into
arokem:masterfrom 
brunobeltran:existing-session
Closed
Existing session#209
brunobeltran wants to merge 7 commits into
arokem:masterfrom 
brunobeltran:existing-session
Conversation
@brunobeltran
@brunobeltranbrunobeltran
commented
Aug 25, 2015

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
PR Contains:
  1. Preliminary solution to Issue Connect to an already running Matlab instance instead of making one #196.
  2. Reorganization of code to facilitate Matlab scripts that use pymatbridge to call Python functions. Separation of concerns (moving _preamble_code to matlabserver helper functions) is how I think the solution to clear potential hang conditions #13 should look.
  3. Replaced all "print" and *.write() statements with configurable logging.
  4. Tried to update code comments that were out of date.
The new convention for connecting to Matlab is that
lab = Matlab(executable=something, ...)

follows the old behavior, while
lab = Matlab(executable=None, socket_addr='ipc:///something', ...)

connects to a Matlab sessions where the matlabserver.m function is being executed.
The only thing I'm having trouble getting to work is the new "separate" command, designed for when you've started a Matlab session via Matlab(executable=matlab).start() and later decide that what you need to do requires (or would just be nicer) if you were to drop into Matlab proper without having to save, exit, and reload the workspace. Combined with the ability to dynamically connect to Matlab, this could facilitate workflows that involve actively switching back and forth.
On my box, calling something like

lab = Matlab()

lab.start()

lab.separate()

opens the Matlab desktop GUI, as expected, but the ZMQ socket and context closing messages are mysteriously printed twice, and the GUI eventually exists without becoming available for use. Any ideas here?
@brunobeltran
brunobeltran
commented
Aug 25, 2015

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Man, it must have been really late when I made the pull request. Problem with lab.separate() was super simple. Fixed now, as well as some bug fixes in messenger.c that I missed in my half-asleep state.
@brunobeltran
brunobeltran
commented
Sep 11, 2015

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
rebase'd over my previous pull request, so this branch should be merge-able. Any thoughts on why it hasn't been merged, or is it just a not-enough-time thing?
@arokem
arokem
commented
Sep 11, 2015

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Just not-enough-time. I really want to sort out the Travis breakage on

master, before considering any more massive changes, but have been too busy

with a host of other things, and this has languished. Again - working

towards a deadline mid-next-week, but might have time to look towards the

end of the week. Sorry for the delay...
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Bruno Beltran notifications@github.com

wrote:
rebase'd over my previous pull request, so this branch should be

merge-able. Any thoughts on why it hasn't been merged, or is it just a

not-enough-time thing?
—

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#209 (comment)

.
@arokem
arokem
commented
Sep 21, 2015

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Can I close this one? Looks like it's superseded by #218
@brunobeltran
brunobeltran
commented
Sep 21, 2015

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Oh, didn't realize I had the inf-fix stuff over this branch. Putting it all in one place sounds fine to me.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@brunobeltran@arokem

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

Skip to content
Existing session - #209
Closed
brunobeltran wants to merge 7 commits into
arokem:masterfrom 
brunobeltran:existing-session
Closed
Existing session#209
brunobeltran wants to merge 7 commits into
arokem:masterfrom 
brunobeltran:existing-session
Conversation
@brunobeltran
@brunobeltranbrunobeltran
commented
Aug 25, 2015

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
PR Contains:
  1. Preliminary solution to Issue Connect to an already running Matlab instance instead of making one #196.
  2. Reorganization of code to facilitate Matlab scripts that use pymatbridge to call Python functions. Separation of concerns (moving _preamble_code to matlabserver helper functions) is how I think the solution to clear potential hang conditions #13 should look.
  3. Replaced all "print" and *.write() statements with configurable logging.
  4. Tried to update code comments that were out of date.
The new convention for connecting to Matlab is that
lab = Matlab(executable=something, ...)

follows the old behavior, while
lab = Matlab(executable=None, socket_addr='ipc:///something', ...)

connects to a Matlab sessions where the matlabserver.m function is being executed.
The only thing I'm having trouble getting to work is the new "separate" command, designed for when you've started a Matlab session via Matlab(executable=matlab).start() and later decide that what you need to do requires (or would just be nicer) if you were to drop into Matlab proper without having to save, exit, and reload the workspace. Combined with the ability to dynamically connect to Matlab, this could facilitate workflows that involve actively switching back and forth.
On my box, calling something like

lab = Matlab()

lab.start()

lab.separate()

opens the Matlab desktop GUI, as expected, but the ZMQ socket and context closing messages are mysteriously printed twice, and the GUI eventually exists without becoming available for use. Any ideas here?
@brunobeltran
brunobeltran
commented
Aug 25, 2015

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Man, it must have been really late when I made the pull request. Problem with lab.separate() was super simple. Fixed now, as well as some bug fixes in messenger.c that I missed in my half-asleep state.
@brunobeltran
brunobeltran
commented
Sep 11, 2015

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
rebase'd over my previous pull request, so this branch should be merge-able. Any thoughts on why it hasn't been merged, or is it just a not-enough-time thing?
@arokem
arokem
commented
Sep 11, 2015

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Just not-enough-time. I really want to sort out the Travis breakage on

master, before considering any more massive changes, but have been too busy

with a host of other things, and this has languished. Again - working

towards a deadline mid-next-week, but might have time to look towards the

end of the week. Sorry for the delay...
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Bruno Beltran notifications@github.com

wrote:
rebase'd over my previous pull request, so this branch should be

merge-able. Any thoughts on why it hasn't been merged, or is it just a

not-enough-time thing?
—

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#209 (comment)

.
@arokem
arokem
commented
Sep 21, 2015

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Can I close this one? Looks like it's superseded by #218
@brunobeltran
brunobeltran
commented
Sep 21, 2015

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Oh, didn't realize I had the inf-fix stuff over this branch. Putting it all in one place sounds fine to me.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@brunobeltran@arokem