[DO NOT MERGE] test: verify Codecov config takes effect (same-repo) - #6055

Closed
jam-jee wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
codecov-verify-donotmerge
Closed

[DO NOT MERGE] test: verify Codecov config takes effect (same-repo)#6055
jam-jee wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
codecov-verify-donotmerge

Conversation

@jam-jee

@jam-jeejam-jee commented Jul 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

⚠️ DO NOT MERGE — verification PR

Confirms the merged codecov.yml (PR #6034) takes effect. Makes a no-op docstring-only change in sagemaker.mlops to force a unit-test coverage upload so Codecov recomputes.

Why same-repo (not a fork): the earlier fork-based attempt (#6054) uploaded coverage but Codecov errored it (state=error, sessions=0) because the CodeBuild uploader gets no PR/branch context for fork PRs (pr=false, empty branch). Same-repo branches upload with full context (verified: #6051 processed cleanly with sessions=4), so Codecov will actually process and post here.

This branch is cut from current master (which contains codecov.yml). Expected result:

  • test files excluded via ignore: (previously ~98% of measured files were test files)
  • project ~71% product-only, not the old ~90%
  • status targets project 65% / patch 70%

Will be closed without merging once verified.

@jam-jee
test: trigger CI to verify Codecov config (DO NOT MERGE)
ee7872c
No-op docstring line in sagemaker.mlops to force a unit-test coverage
upload from a SAME-REPO branch (fork PRs upload without PR/branch context
and Codecov errors them). Confirms the merged codecov.yml takes effect:
- test files excluded from the report (ignore: list)
- product-only project coverage (~71%, not the old test-inflated ~90%)
- project floor 65% / patch 70% status targets
Branch cut from current master (contains codecov.yml). Verification only.
This was referenced Jul 18, 2026
Closed
Merged
Closed
@jam-jeejam-jee closed this Jul 18, 2026
jam-jee added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 27, 2026
@jam-jee
fix: remove codecov after_n_builds so single-submodule PRs report cov…
ee8bf12
…erage (#6056)
`after_n_builds: 4` made Codecov wait for four coverage uploads before
finalizing a report. But this repo's CI runs unit tests only for the
submodules a PR changes (detect-changes), so a PR touching 1-3 submodules
produces fewer than four uploads. Codecov then waits forever and never
posts a report or status.
Observed on PR #6055 (changed only sagemaker-mlops): the mlops unit-test
job uploaded coverage successfully, but Codecov reported state=error,
sessions=0 and posted no codecov/project or codecov/patch status, because
it was still waiting for three more uploads that never come.
Drop the fixed count and rely on `wait_for_ci: true`, which finalizes the
report once CI completes using whatever uploaded — correct for this repo's
dynamic per-submodule CI.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@jam-jee
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

Skip to content
[DO NOT MERGE] test: verify Codecov config takes effect (same-repo) - #6055
Closed
jam-jee wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom 
codecov-verify-donotmerge
Closed
[DO NOT MERGE] test: verify Codecov config takes effect (same-repo)#6055
jam-jee wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom 
codecov-verify-donotmerge
Conversation
@jam-jee
@jam-jeejam-jee
commented
Jul 18, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
⚠️ DO NOT MERGE — verification PR
Confirms the merged codecov.yml (PR #6034) takes effect. Makes a no-op docstring-only change in sagemaker.mlops to force a unit-test coverage upload so Codecov recomputes.
Why same-repo (not a fork): the earlier fork-based attempt (#6054) uploaded coverage but Codecov errored it (state=error, sessions=0) because the CodeBuild uploader gets no PR/branch context for fork PRs (pr=false, empty branch). Same-repo branches upload with full context (verified: #6051 processed cleanly with sessions=4), so Codecov will actually process and post here.
This branch is cut from current master (which contains codecov.yml). Expected result:
  • test files excluded via ignore: (previously ~98% of measured files were test files)
  • project ~71% product-only, not the old ~90%
  • status targets project 65% / patch 70%
Will be closed without merging once verified.
@jam-jee
test: trigger CI to verify Codecov config (DO NOT MERGE)
ee7872c
No-op docstring line in sagemaker.mlops to force a unit-test coverage
upload from a SAME-REPO branch (fork PRs upload without PR/branch context
and Codecov errors them). Confirms the merged codecov.yml takes effect:
- test files excluded from the report (ignore: list)
- product-only project coverage (~71%, not the old test-inflated ~90%)
- project floor 65% / patch 70% status targets
Branch cut from current master (contains codecov.yml). Verification only.

This was referenced Jul 18, 2026
 Closed

 Merged

 Closed

@jam-jeejam-jee
closed this
Jul 18, 2026
jam-jee added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 27, 2026
@jam-jee
fix: remove codecov after_n_builds so single-submodule PRs report cov…
ee8bf12
…erage (#6056)
`after_n_builds: 4` made Codecov wait for four coverage uploads before
finalizing a report. But this repo's CI runs unit tests only for the
submodules a PR changes (detect-changes), so a PR touching 1-3 submodules
produces fewer than four uploads. Codecov then waits forever and never
posts a report or status.
Observed on PR #6055 (changed only sagemaker-mlops): the mlops unit-test
job uploaded coverage successfully, but Codecov reported state=error,
sessions=0 and posted no codecov/project or codecov/patch status, because
it was still waiting for three more uploads that never come.
Drop the fixed count and rely on `wait_for_ci: true`, which finalizes the
report once CI completes using whatever uploaded — correct for this repo's
dynamic per-submodule CI.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@jam-jee

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
[DO NOT MERGE] test: verify Codecov config takes effect (same-repo) - #6055
Closed
jam-jee wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom 
codecov-verify-donotmerge
Closed
[DO NOT MERGE] test: verify Codecov config takes effect (same-repo)#6055
jam-jee wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom 
codecov-verify-donotmerge
Conversation
@jam-jee
@jam-jeejam-jee
commented
Jul 18, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
⚠️ DO NOT MERGE — verification PR
Confirms the merged codecov.yml (PR #6034) takes effect. Makes a no-op docstring-only change in sagemaker.mlops to force a unit-test coverage upload so Codecov recomputes.
Why same-repo (not a fork): the earlier fork-based attempt (#6054) uploaded coverage but Codecov errored it (state=error, sessions=0) because the CodeBuild uploader gets no PR/branch context for fork PRs (pr=false, empty branch). Same-repo branches upload with full context (verified: #6051 processed cleanly with sessions=4), so Codecov will actually process and post here.
This branch is cut from current master (which contains codecov.yml). Expected result:
  • test files excluded via ignore: (previously ~98% of measured files were test files)
  • project ~71% product-only, not the old ~90%
  • status targets project 65% / patch 70%
Will be closed without merging once verified.
@jam-jee
test: trigger CI to verify Codecov config (DO NOT MERGE)
ee7872c
No-op docstring line in sagemaker.mlops to force a unit-test coverage
upload from a SAME-REPO branch (fork PRs upload without PR/branch context
and Codecov errors them). Confirms the merged codecov.yml takes effect:
- test files excluded from the report (ignore: list)
- product-only project coverage (~71%, not the old test-inflated ~90%)
- project floor 65% / patch 70% status targets
Branch cut from current master (contains codecov.yml). Verification only.

This was referenced Jul 18, 2026
 Closed

 Merged

 Closed

@jam-jeejam-jee
closed this
Jul 18, 2026
jam-jee added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 27, 2026
@jam-jee
fix: remove codecov after_n_builds so single-submodule PRs report cov…
ee8bf12
…erage (#6056)
`after_n_builds: 4` made Codecov wait for four coverage uploads before
finalizing a report. But this repo's CI runs unit tests only for the
submodules a PR changes (detect-changes), so a PR touching 1-3 submodules
produces fewer than four uploads. Codecov then waits forever and never
posts a report or status.
Observed on PR #6055 (changed only sagemaker-mlops): the mlops unit-test
job uploaded coverage successfully, but Codecov reported state=error,
sessions=0 and posted no codecov/project or codecov/patch status, because
it was still waiting for three more uploads that never come.
Drop the fixed count and rely on `wait_for_ci: true`, which finalizes the
report once CI completes using whatever uploaded — correct for this repo's
dynamic per-submodule CI.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@jam-jee

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
[DO NOT MERGE] test: verify Codecov config takes effect (same-repo) - #6055
Closed
jam-jee wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom 
codecov-verify-donotmerge
Closed
[DO NOT MERGE] test: verify Codecov config takes effect (same-repo)#6055
jam-jee wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom 
codecov-verify-donotmerge
Conversation
@jam-jee
@jam-jeejam-jee
commented
Jul 18, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
⚠️ DO NOT MERGE — verification PR
Confirms the merged codecov.yml (PR #6034) takes effect. Makes a no-op docstring-only change in sagemaker.mlops to force a unit-test coverage upload so Codecov recomputes.
Why same-repo (not a fork): the earlier fork-based attempt (#6054) uploaded coverage but Codecov errored it (state=error, sessions=0) because the CodeBuild uploader gets no PR/branch context for fork PRs (pr=false, empty branch). Same-repo branches upload with full context (verified: #6051 processed cleanly with sessions=4), so Codecov will actually process and post here.
This branch is cut from current master (which contains codecov.yml). Expected result:
  • test files excluded via ignore: (previously ~98% of measured files were test files)
  • project ~71% product-only, not the old ~90%
  • status targets project 65% / patch 70%
Will be closed without merging once verified.
@jam-jee
test: trigger CI to verify Codecov config (DO NOT MERGE)
ee7872c
No-op docstring line in sagemaker.mlops to force a unit-test coverage
upload from a SAME-REPO branch (fork PRs upload without PR/branch context
and Codecov errors them). Confirms the merged codecov.yml takes effect:
- test files excluded from the report (ignore: list)
- product-only project coverage (~71%, not the old test-inflated ~90%)
- project floor 65% / patch 70% status targets
Branch cut from current master (contains codecov.yml). Verification only.

This was referenced Jul 18, 2026
 Closed

 Merged

 Closed

@jam-jeejam-jee
closed this
Jul 18, 2026
jam-jee added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 27, 2026
@jam-jee
fix: remove codecov after_n_builds so single-submodule PRs report cov…
ee8bf12
…erage (#6056)
`after_n_builds: 4` made Codecov wait for four coverage uploads before
finalizing a report. But this repo's CI runs unit tests only for the
submodules a PR changes (detect-changes), so a PR touching 1-3 submodules
produces fewer than four uploads. Codecov then waits forever and never
posts a report or status.
Observed on PR #6055 (changed only sagemaker-mlops): the mlops unit-test
job uploaded coverage successfully, but Codecov reported state=error,
sessions=0 and posted no codecov/project or codecov/patch status, because
it was still waiting for three more uploads that never come.
Drop the fixed count and rely on `wait_for_ci: true`, which finalizes the
report once CI completes using whatever uploaded — correct for this repo's
dynamic per-submodule CI.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@jam-jee

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

Skip to content
[DO NOT MERGE] test: verify Codecov config takes effect (same-repo) - #6055
Closed
jam-jee wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom 
codecov-verify-donotmerge
Closed
[DO NOT MERGE] test: verify Codecov config takes effect (same-repo)#6055
jam-jee wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom 
codecov-verify-donotmerge
Conversation
@jam-jee
@jam-jeejam-jee
commented
Jul 18, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
⚠️ DO NOT MERGE — verification PR
Confirms the merged codecov.yml (PR #6034) takes effect. Makes a no-op docstring-only change in sagemaker.mlops to force a unit-test coverage upload so Codecov recomputes.
Why same-repo (not a fork): the earlier fork-based attempt (#6054) uploaded coverage but Codecov errored it (state=error, sessions=0) because the CodeBuild uploader gets no PR/branch context for fork PRs (pr=false, empty branch). Same-repo branches upload with full context (verified: #6051 processed cleanly with sessions=4), so Codecov will actually process and post here.
This branch is cut from current master (which contains codecov.yml). Expected result:
  • test files excluded via ignore: (previously ~98% of measured files were test files)
  • project ~71% product-only, not the old ~90%
  • status targets project 65% / patch 70%
Will be closed without merging once verified.
@jam-jee
test: trigger CI to verify Codecov config (DO NOT MERGE)
ee7872c
No-op docstring line in sagemaker.mlops to force a unit-test coverage
upload from a SAME-REPO branch (fork PRs upload without PR/branch context
and Codecov errors them). Confirms the merged codecov.yml takes effect:
- test files excluded from the report (ignore: list)
- product-only project coverage (~71%, not the old test-inflated ~90%)
- project floor 65% / patch 70% status targets
Branch cut from current master (contains codecov.yml). Verification only.

This was referenced Jul 18, 2026
 Closed

 Merged

 Closed

@jam-jeejam-jee
closed this
Jul 18, 2026
jam-jee added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 27, 2026
@jam-jee
fix: remove codecov after_n_builds so single-submodule PRs report cov…
ee8bf12
…erage (#6056)
`after_n_builds: 4` made Codecov wait for four coverage uploads before
finalizing a report. But this repo's CI runs unit tests only for the
submodules a PR changes (detect-changes), so a PR touching 1-3 submodules
produces fewer than four uploads. Codecov then waits forever and never
posts a report or status.
Observed on PR #6055 (changed only sagemaker-mlops): the mlops unit-test
job uploaded coverage successfully, but Codecov reported state=error,
sessions=0 and posted no codecov/project or codecov/patch status, because
it was still waiting for three more uploads that never come.
Drop the fixed count and rely on `wait_for_ci: true`, which finalizes the
report once CI completes using whatever uploaded — correct for this repo's
dynamic per-submodule CI.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@jam-jee

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
[DO NOT MERGE] test: verify Codecov config takes effect (same-repo) - #6055
Closed
jam-jee wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom 
codecov-verify-donotmerge
Closed
[DO NOT MERGE] test: verify Codecov config takes effect (same-repo)#6055
jam-jee wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom 
codecov-verify-donotmerge
Conversation
@jam-jee
@jam-jeejam-jee
commented
Jul 18, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
⚠️ DO NOT MERGE — verification PR
Confirms the merged codecov.yml (PR #6034) takes effect. Makes a no-op docstring-only change in sagemaker.mlops to force a unit-test coverage upload so Codecov recomputes.
Why same-repo (not a fork): the earlier fork-based attempt (#6054) uploaded coverage but Codecov errored it (state=error, sessions=0) because the CodeBuild uploader gets no PR/branch context for fork PRs (pr=false, empty branch). Same-repo branches upload with full context (verified: #6051 processed cleanly with sessions=4), so Codecov will actually process and post here.
This branch is cut from current master (which contains codecov.yml). Expected result:
  • test files excluded via ignore: (previously ~98% of measured files were test files)
  • project ~71% product-only, not the old ~90%
  • status targets project 65% / patch 70%
Will be closed without merging once verified.
@jam-jee
test: trigger CI to verify Codecov config (DO NOT MERGE)
ee7872c
No-op docstring line in sagemaker.mlops to force a unit-test coverage
upload from a SAME-REPO branch (fork PRs upload without PR/branch context
and Codecov errors them). Confirms the merged codecov.yml takes effect:
- test files excluded from the report (ignore: list)
- product-only project coverage (~71%, not the old test-inflated ~90%)
- project floor 65% / patch 70% status targets
Branch cut from current master (contains codecov.yml). Verification only.

This was referenced Jul 18, 2026
 Closed

 Merged

 Closed

@jam-jeejam-jee
closed this
Jul 18, 2026
jam-jee added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 27, 2026
@jam-jee
fix: remove codecov after_n_builds so single-submodule PRs report cov…
ee8bf12
…erage (#6056)
`after_n_builds: 4` made Codecov wait for four coverage uploads before
finalizing a report. But this repo's CI runs unit tests only for the
submodules a PR changes (detect-changes), so a PR touching 1-3 submodules
produces fewer than four uploads. Codecov then waits forever and never
posts a report or status.
Observed on PR #6055 (changed only sagemaker-mlops): the mlops unit-test
job uploaded coverage successfully, but Codecov reported state=error,
sessions=0 and posted no codecov/project or codecov/patch status, because
it was still waiting for three more uploads that never come.
Drop the fixed count and rely on `wait_for_ci: true`, which finalizes the
report once CI completes using whatever uploaded — correct for this repo's
dynamic per-submodule CI.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@jam-jee

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
[DO NOT MERGE] test: verify Codecov config takes effect (same-repo) - #6055
Closed
jam-jee wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom 
codecov-verify-donotmerge
Closed
[DO NOT MERGE] test: verify Codecov config takes effect (same-repo)#6055
jam-jee wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom 
codecov-verify-donotmerge
Conversation
@jam-jee
@jam-jeejam-jee
commented
Jul 18, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
⚠️ DO NOT MERGE — verification PR
Confirms the merged codecov.yml (PR #6034) takes effect. Makes a no-op docstring-only change in sagemaker.mlops to force a unit-test coverage upload so Codecov recomputes.
Why same-repo (not a fork): the earlier fork-based attempt (#6054) uploaded coverage but Codecov errored it (state=error, sessions=0) because the CodeBuild uploader gets no PR/branch context for fork PRs (pr=false, empty branch). Same-repo branches upload with full context (verified: #6051 processed cleanly with sessions=4), so Codecov will actually process and post here.
This branch is cut from current master (which contains codecov.yml). Expected result:
  • test files excluded via ignore: (previously ~98% of measured files were test files)
  • project ~71% product-only, not the old ~90%
  • status targets project 65% / patch 70%
Will be closed without merging once verified.
@jam-jee
test: trigger CI to verify Codecov config (DO NOT MERGE)
ee7872c
No-op docstring line in sagemaker.mlops to force a unit-test coverage
upload from a SAME-REPO branch (fork PRs upload without PR/branch context
and Codecov errors them). Confirms the merged codecov.yml takes effect:
- test files excluded from the report (ignore: list)
- product-only project coverage (~71%, not the old test-inflated ~90%)
- project floor 65% / patch 70% status targets
Branch cut from current master (contains codecov.yml). Verification only.

This was referenced Jul 18, 2026
 Closed

 Merged

 Closed

@jam-jeejam-jee
closed this
Jul 18, 2026
jam-jee added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 27, 2026
@jam-jee
fix: remove codecov after_n_builds so single-submodule PRs report cov…
ee8bf12
…erage (#6056)
`after_n_builds: 4` made Codecov wait for four coverage uploads before
finalizing a report. But this repo's CI runs unit tests only for the
submodules a PR changes (detect-changes), so a PR touching 1-3 submodules
produces fewer than four uploads. Codecov then waits forever and never
posts a report or status.
Observed on PR #6055 (changed only sagemaker-mlops): the mlops unit-test
job uploaded coverage successfully, but Codecov reported state=error,
sessions=0 and posted no codecov/project or codecov/patch status, because
it was still waiting for three more uploads that never come.
Drop the fixed count and rely on `wait_for_ci: true`, which finalizes the
report once CI completes using whatever uploaded — correct for this repo's
dynamic per-submodule CI.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@jam-jee

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

Skip to content
[DO NOT MERGE] test: verify Codecov config takes effect (same-repo) - #6055
Closed
jam-jee wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom 
codecov-verify-donotmerge
Closed
[DO NOT MERGE] test: verify Codecov config takes effect (same-repo)#6055
jam-jee wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom 
codecov-verify-donotmerge
Conversation
@jam-jee
@jam-jeejam-jee
commented
Jul 18, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Collaborator
⚠️ DO NOT MERGE — verification PR
Confirms the merged codecov.yml (PR #6034) takes effect. Makes a no-op docstring-only change in sagemaker.mlops to force a unit-test coverage upload so Codecov recomputes.
Why same-repo (not a fork): the earlier fork-based attempt (#6054) uploaded coverage but Codecov errored it (state=error, sessions=0) because the CodeBuild uploader gets no PR/branch context for fork PRs (pr=false, empty branch). Same-repo branches upload with full context (verified: #6051 processed cleanly with sessions=4), so Codecov will actually process and post here.
This branch is cut from current master (which contains codecov.yml). Expected result:
  • test files excluded via ignore: (previously ~98% of measured files were test files)
  • project ~71% product-only, not the old ~90%
  • status targets project 65% / patch 70%
Will be closed without merging once verified.
@jam-jee
test: trigger CI to verify Codecov config (DO NOT MERGE)
ee7872c
No-op docstring line in sagemaker.mlops to force a unit-test coverage
upload from a SAME-REPO branch (fork PRs upload without PR/branch context
and Codecov errors them). Confirms the merged codecov.yml takes effect:
- test files excluded from the report (ignore: list)
- product-only project coverage (~71%, not the old test-inflated ~90%)
- project floor 65% / patch 70% status targets
Branch cut from current master (contains codecov.yml). Verification only.

This was referenced Jul 18, 2026
 Closed

 Merged

 Closed

@jam-jeejam-jee
closed this
Jul 18, 2026
jam-jee added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 27, 2026
@jam-jee
fix: remove codecov after_n_builds so single-submodule PRs report cov…
ee8bf12
…erage (#6056)
`after_n_builds: 4` made Codecov wait for four coverage uploads before
finalizing a report. But this repo's CI runs unit tests only for the
submodules a PR changes (detect-changes), so a PR touching 1-3 submodules
produces fewer than four uploads. Codecov then waits forever and never
posts a report or status.
Observed on PR #6055 (changed only sagemaker-mlops): the mlops unit-test
job uploaded coverage successfully, but Codecov reported state=error,
sessions=0 and posted no codecov/project or codecov/patch status, because
it was still waiting for three more uploads that never come.
Drop the fixed count and rely on `wait_for_ci: true`, which finalizes the
report once CI completes using whatever uploaded — correct for this repo's
dynamic per-submodule CI.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@jam-jee