Bump esplora-client to v0.13.0 - #2189

Draft
luisschwab wants to merge 1 commit into
bitcoindevkit:masterfrom
luisschwab:feat/bump-esplora-client
Draft

Bump esplora-client to v0.13.0#2189
luisschwab wants to merge 1 commit into
bitcoindevkit:masterfrom
luisschwab:feat/bump-esplora-client

Conversation

@luisschwab

@luisschwabluisschwab commented Apr 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

TBD

@oleonardolima

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ping @luisschwab
Could you update to use the latest esplora-client master ?
I think there's something broken that VM's mentioned in the last call.

@luisschwab

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

It seems get_block_infos (plural) is missing, we only have get_block_info (singular).

@luisschwab
luisschwabforce-pushed the feat/bump-esplora-client branch 3 times, most recently from ed15929 to 06b52edCompareJune 15, 2026 18:13
@bitcoindevkitbitcoindevkit deleted a comment from codecovBotJun 15, 2026
@luisschwab

luisschwab commented Jun 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

It seems that bitreq doesn't properly support a WASM transport. We may need to hold off on bumping it here until that is addressed.

We can make a 0.13.1 point release once bitreq gets this sorted out.

cc @oleonardolima

@codecov

codecovBot commented Jun 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 78.65%. Comparing base (023fdf0) to head (8deea92).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #2189 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 78.65% 78.65% =======================================
Files 30 30 Lines 5909 5909 Branches 279 279 =======================================
Hits 4648 4648 Misses 1185 1185 Partials 76 76 
FlagCoverage Δ
rust78.65% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: No status

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@luisschwab@oleonardolima
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Bump esplora-client to v0.13.0 - #2189

Draft
luisschwab wants to merge 1 commit into
bitcoindevkit:masterfrom
luisschwab:feat/bump-esplora-client
Draft

Bump esplora-client to v0.13.0#2189
luisschwab wants to merge 1 commit into
bitcoindevkit:masterfrom
luisschwab:feat/bump-esplora-client

Conversation

@luisschwab

@luisschwabluisschwab commented Apr 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

TBD

@oleonardolima

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ping @luisschwab
Could you update to use the latest esplora-client master ?
I think there's something broken that VM's mentioned in the last call.

@luisschwab

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

It seems get_block_infos (plural) is missing, we only have get_block_info (singular).

@luisschwab
luisschwabforce-pushed the feat/bump-esplora-client branch 3 times, most recently from ed15929 to 06b52edCompareJune 15, 2026 18:13
@bitcoindevkitbitcoindevkit deleted a comment from codecovBotJun 15, 2026
@luisschwab

luisschwab commented Jun 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

It seems that bitreq doesn't properly support a WASM transport. We may need to hold off on bumping it here until that is addressed.

We can make a 0.13.1 point release once bitreq gets this sorted out.

cc @oleonardolima

@codecov

codecovBot commented Jun 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 78.65%. Comparing base (023fdf0) to head (8deea92).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #2189 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 78.65% 78.65% =======================================
Files 30 30 Lines 5909 5909 Branches 279 279 =======================================
Hits 4648 4648 Misses 1185 1185 Partials 76 76 
FlagCoverage Δ
rust78.65% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: No status

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@luisschwab@oleonardolima
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Bump esplora-client to v0.13.0 - #2189

Draft
luisschwab wants to merge 1 commit into
bitcoindevkit:masterfrom
luisschwab:feat/bump-esplora-client
Draft

Bump esplora-client to v0.13.0#2189
luisschwab wants to merge 1 commit into
bitcoindevkit:masterfrom
luisschwab:feat/bump-esplora-client

Conversation

@luisschwab

@luisschwabluisschwab commented Apr 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

TBD

@oleonardolima

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ping @luisschwab
Could you update to use the latest esplora-client master ?
I think there's something broken that VM's mentioned in the last call.

@luisschwab

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

It seems get_block_infos (plural) is missing, we only have get_block_info (singular).

@luisschwab
luisschwabforce-pushed the feat/bump-esplora-client branch 3 times, most recently from ed15929 to 06b52edCompareJune 15, 2026 18:13
@bitcoindevkitbitcoindevkit deleted a comment from codecovBotJun 15, 2026
@luisschwab

luisschwab commented Jun 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

It seems that bitreq doesn't properly support a WASM transport. We may need to hold off on bumping it here until that is addressed.

We can make a 0.13.1 point release once bitreq gets this sorted out.

cc @oleonardolima

@codecov

codecovBot commented Jun 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 78.65%. Comparing base (023fdf0) to head (8deea92).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #2189 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 78.65% 78.65% =======================================
Files 30 30 Lines 5909 5909 Branches 279 279 =======================================
Hits 4648 4648 Misses 1185 1185 Partials 76 76 
FlagCoverage Δ
rust78.65% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: No status

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@luisschwab@oleonardolima
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Bump esplora-client to v0.13.0 - #2189

Draft
luisschwab wants to merge 1 commit into
bitcoindevkit:masterfrom
luisschwab:feat/bump-esplora-client
Draft

Bump esplora-client to v0.13.0#2189
luisschwab wants to merge 1 commit into
bitcoindevkit:masterfrom
luisschwab:feat/bump-esplora-client

Conversation

@luisschwab

@luisschwabluisschwab commented Apr 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

TBD

@oleonardolima

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ping @luisschwab
Could you update to use the latest esplora-client master ?
I think there's something broken that VM's mentioned in the last call.

@luisschwab

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

It seems get_block_infos (plural) is missing, we only have get_block_info (singular).

@luisschwab
luisschwabforce-pushed the feat/bump-esplora-client branch 3 times, most recently from ed15929 to 06b52edCompareJune 15, 2026 18:13
@bitcoindevkitbitcoindevkit deleted a comment from codecovBotJun 15, 2026
@luisschwab

luisschwab commented Jun 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

It seems that bitreq doesn't properly support a WASM transport. We may need to hold off on bumping it here until that is addressed.

We can make a 0.13.1 point release once bitreq gets this sorted out.

cc @oleonardolima

@codecov

codecovBot commented Jun 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 78.65%. Comparing base (023fdf0) to head (8deea92).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #2189 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 78.65% 78.65% =======================================
Files 30 30 Lines 5909 5909 Branches 279 279 =======================================
Hits 4648 4648 Misses 1185 1185 Partials 76 76 
FlagCoverage Δ
rust78.65% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: No status

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@luisschwab@oleonardolima
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Bump esplora-client to v0.13.0 - #2189

Draft
luisschwab wants to merge 1 commit into
bitcoindevkit:masterfrom
luisschwab:feat/bump-esplora-client
Draft

Bump esplora-client to v0.13.0#2189
luisschwab wants to merge 1 commit into
bitcoindevkit:masterfrom
luisschwab:feat/bump-esplora-client

Conversation

@luisschwab

@luisschwabluisschwab commented Apr 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

TBD

@oleonardolima

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ping @luisschwab
Could you update to use the latest esplora-client master ?
I think there's something broken that VM's mentioned in the last call.

@luisschwab

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

It seems get_block_infos (plural) is missing, we only have get_block_info (singular).

@luisschwab
luisschwabforce-pushed the feat/bump-esplora-client branch 3 times, most recently from ed15929 to 06b52edCompareJune 15, 2026 18:13
@bitcoindevkitbitcoindevkit deleted a comment from codecovBotJun 15, 2026
@luisschwab

luisschwab commented Jun 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

It seems that bitreq doesn't properly support a WASM transport. We may need to hold off on bumping it here until that is addressed.

We can make a 0.13.1 point release once bitreq gets this sorted out.

cc @oleonardolima

@codecov

codecovBot commented Jun 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 78.65%. Comparing base (023fdf0) to head (8deea92).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #2189 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 78.65% 78.65% =======================================
Files 30 30 Lines 5909 5909 Branches 279 279 =======================================
Hits 4648 4648 Misses 1185 1185 Partials 76 76 
FlagCoverage Δ
rust78.65% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: No status

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@luisschwab@oleonardolima
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Bump esplora-client to v0.13.0 - #2189

Draft
luisschwab wants to merge 1 commit into
bitcoindevkit:masterfrom
luisschwab:feat/bump-esplora-client
Draft

Bump esplora-client to v0.13.0#2189
luisschwab wants to merge 1 commit into
bitcoindevkit:masterfrom
luisschwab:feat/bump-esplora-client

Conversation

@luisschwab

@luisschwabluisschwab commented Apr 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

TBD

@oleonardolima

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ping @luisschwab
Could you update to use the latest esplora-client master ?
I think there's something broken that VM's mentioned in the last call.

@luisschwab

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

It seems get_block_infos (plural) is missing, we only have get_block_info (singular).

@luisschwab
luisschwabforce-pushed the feat/bump-esplora-client branch 3 times, most recently from ed15929 to 06b52edCompareJune 15, 2026 18:13
@bitcoindevkitbitcoindevkit deleted a comment from codecovBotJun 15, 2026
@luisschwab

luisschwab commented Jun 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

It seems that bitreq doesn't properly support a WASM transport. We may need to hold off on bumping it here until that is addressed.

We can make a 0.13.1 point release once bitreq gets this sorted out.

cc @oleonardolima

@codecov

codecovBot commented Jun 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 78.65%. Comparing base (023fdf0) to head (8deea92).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #2189 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 78.65% 78.65% =======================================
Files 30 30 Lines 5909 5909 Branches 279 279 =======================================
Hits 4648 4648 Misses 1185 1185 Partials 76 76 
FlagCoverage Δ
rust78.65% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: No status

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@luisschwab@oleonardolima
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Bump esplora-client to v0.13.0 - #2189

Draft
luisschwab wants to merge 1 commit into
bitcoindevkit:masterfrom
luisschwab:feat/bump-esplora-client
Draft

Bump esplora-client to v0.13.0#2189
luisschwab wants to merge 1 commit into
bitcoindevkit:masterfrom
luisschwab:feat/bump-esplora-client

Conversation

@luisschwab

@luisschwabluisschwab commented Apr 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

TBD

@oleonardolima

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ping @luisschwab
Could you update to use the latest esplora-client master ?
I think there's something broken that VM's mentioned in the last call.

@luisschwab

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

It seems get_block_infos (plural) is missing, we only have get_block_info (singular).

@luisschwab
luisschwabforce-pushed the feat/bump-esplora-client branch 3 times, most recently from ed15929 to 06b52edCompareJune 15, 2026 18:13
@bitcoindevkitbitcoindevkit deleted a comment from codecovBotJun 15, 2026
@luisschwab

luisschwab commented Jun 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

It seems that bitreq doesn't properly support a WASM transport. We may need to hold off on bumping it here until that is addressed.

We can make a 0.13.1 point release once bitreq gets this sorted out.

cc @oleonardolima

@codecov

codecovBot commented Jun 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 78.65%. Comparing base (023fdf0) to head (8deea92).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #2189 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 78.65% 78.65% =======================================
Files 30 30 Lines 5909 5909 Branches 279 279 =======================================
Hits 4648 4648 Misses 1185 1185 Partials 76 76 
FlagCoverage Δ
rust78.65% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: No status

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@luisschwab@oleonardolima
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Bump esplora-client to v0.13.0 - #2189

Draft
luisschwab wants to merge 1 commit into
bitcoindevkit:masterfrom
luisschwab:feat/bump-esplora-client
Draft

Bump esplora-client to v0.13.0#2189
luisschwab wants to merge 1 commit into
bitcoindevkit:masterfrom
luisschwab:feat/bump-esplora-client

Conversation

@luisschwab

@luisschwabluisschwab commented Apr 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

TBD

@oleonardolima

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ping @luisschwab
Could you update to use the latest esplora-client master ?
I think there's something broken that VM's mentioned in the last call.

@luisschwab

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

It seems get_block_infos (plural) is missing, we only have get_block_info (singular).

@luisschwab
luisschwabforce-pushed the feat/bump-esplora-client branch 3 times, most recently from ed15929 to 06b52edCompareJune 15, 2026 18:13
@bitcoindevkitbitcoindevkit deleted a comment from codecovBotJun 15, 2026
@luisschwab

luisschwab commented Jun 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

It seems that bitreq doesn't properly support a WASM transport. We may need to hold off on bumping it here until that is addressed.

We can make a 0.13.1 point release once bitreq gets this sorted out.

cc @oleonardolima

@codecov

codecovBot commented Jun 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 78.65%. Comparing base (023fdf0) to head (8deea92).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #2189 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 78.65% 78.65% =======================================
Files 30 30 Lines 5909 5909 Branches 279 279 =======================================
Hits 4648 4648 Misses 1185 1185 Partials 76 76 
FlagCoverage Δ
rust78.65% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: No status

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@luisschwab@oleonardolima