Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Remove unused features (socket activation and KSM) - #177
Conversation
jodh-intel
commented
Nov 30, 2017
Note that this cannot realistically land until we a stand-alone daemon to handle KSM, hence the dnm label. See: |
clearcontainersbot
commented
Nov 30, 2017
kubernetes qa-failed 👎 |
jodh-intel
commented
Dec 1, 2017
The tests are failing due to https://github.com/clearcontainers/tests/blob/master/.ci/install_proxy.sh#L34..L35 which is trying to modify the proxy's service file (which has been removed by this PR). Once we have a KSM daemon, we can then:
|
Now that the cc-proxy will not be a service, we need to use option -t in journalctl to get the logs from the proxy. Relates to: clearcontainers/runtime#835clearcontainers/proxy#177Fixes: clearcontainers#775 Signed-off-by: Salvador Fuentes <salvador.fuentes@intel.com>
Now that the cc-proxy will not be a service, we need to use option -t in journalctl to get the logs from the proxy. Relates to: clearcontainers/runtime#835clearcontainers/proxy#177Fixes: clearcontainers#775 Signed-off-by: Salvador Fuentes <salvador.fuentes@intel.com>
clearcontainersbot
commented
Dec 14, 2017
kubernetes qa-failed 👎 |
The proxy should not (cannot) handle KSM now that an instance is being launched per pod. Partially fixesclearcontainers#176. Signed-off-by: James O. D. Hunt <james.o.hunt@intel.com>
Socket activation is no longer required since a proxy instance is launched by the runtime for each pod. Fixesclearcontainers#176. Signed-off-by: James O. D. Hunt <james.o.hunt@intel.com>
7e120ec to
e3ab55eCompareclearcontainersbot
commented
Dec 14, 2017
kubernetes qa-failed 👎 |
1 similar comment
clearcontainersbot
commented
Jan 9, 2018
kubernetes qa-failed 👎 |
jodh-intel
commented
Feb 19, 2018
Blocked on clearcontainers/tests#913. We cannot remove the KSM functionality from the proxy until the issue above is resolved since the tests currently install the proxy "manually" using: (Note that user systems would not be affected by removing the functionality since they have the |
jodh-intel
commented
Feb 22, 2018
Hi @chavafg, @grahamwhaley - now that clearcontainers/tests#920 has landed, could you both confirm that I can continue with removing these features from the proxy? |
grahamwhaley
commented
Feb 22, 2018
Let me check some stuff. afaict when we landed clearcontainers/tests#911 then the metrics CI got to do the right thing, but it then appears when we landed clearcontainers/tests#920 it might be back to being nobbled again (that is, KSM seems to be in effect even when we try to turn it off). (oh, and apparently you need a rebase I think any how ;-) ) |
jodh-intel
commented
Feb 22, 2018
yep - I'll hold off rebasing until I get two confirmations :) |
No description provided.