fix(ci): upgrade npm publish jobs to Node.js LTS - #139

Merged
wyattjoh merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/ci-release-node-lts
Apr 9, 2026
Merged

fix(ci): upgrade npm publish jobs to Node.js LTS#139
wyattjoh merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/ci-release-node-lts

Conversation

@wyattjoh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Switch node-version from "22" to "lts/*" in both publish-npm and canary-publish-npm jobs
  • Remove the npm install -g npm@11 upgrade step (Node 24 LTS ships npm 11 already)

Why

node:22 resolved to Node 22.22.2, which ships with a broken bundled npm (missing promise-retry in its internal dependency tree). This caused the upgrade step to fail before any publishing could happen. Node 24 LTS (lts/*) does not have this issue and already includes npm 11.

Node 22.22.2 (the latest node:22 image) ships with a broken bundled npm
(missing promise-retry) that causes npm install -g npm@11 to fail before
publishing. Switch to lts/* so both publish-npm and canary-publish-npm
always run on the latest LTS (currently Node 24), which bundles npm 11
and no longer needs the manual upgrade step.
@wyattjoh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Apr 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 42c0927d-4aba-4e85-8a05-9a68d1ada584

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1bfbec1 and e160dc0.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/snapshot.yml

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Updated GitHub Actions workflows to use node-version: "lts/*" instead of the pinned "22" in publish jobs across .github/workflows/release.yml and .github/workflows/snapshot.yml. Removed explicit npm upgrade steps (npm install -g npm@11) from the affected publish jobs. The workflows continue to use oven-sh/setup-bun@v2, run bun install --frozen-lockfile, and invoke the same bun run release / bun run release:canary / bun run release:snapshot publish commands.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Title check✅ PassedThe title 'fix(ci): upgrade npm publish jobs to Node.js LTS' accurately describes the main changes in the pull request: switching Node.js version from 22 to LTS in publish jobs.
Description check✅ PassedThe description clearly explains the changes (switching node-version to 'lts/*' and removing npm upgrade step) and provides relevant context about the underlying issue with Node 22's bundled npm.
Docstring Coverage✅ PassedNo functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Same broken npm issue as release.yml — node:22 resolved to 22.22.2
with a broken bundled npm. Switch to lts/* and drop the manual upgrade
step, which Node 24 LTS makes unnecessary.
- uses: actions/setup-node@v6
with:
node-version: "22"
node-version: "lts/*"

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Isn't "lts/krypton" safer, since this will just resolve to whatever is the newest LTS, but eventually that will be Node 26 or whatever.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is just to enable the npm publish flow, so getting the latest LTS version of that should be ok I'd think!

@wyattjoh
wyattjoh merged commit f9be436 into mainApr 9, 2026
6 checks passed
@wyattjoh
wyattjoh deleted the fix/ci-release-node-lts branch April 9, 2026 21:01
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@wyattjoh@alexcarpenter@dmoerner
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

fix(ci): upgrade npm publish jobs to Node.js LTS - #139

Merged
wyattjoh merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/ci-release-node-lts
Apr 9, 2026
Merged

fix(ci): upgrade npm publish jobs to Node.js LTS#139
wyattjoh merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/ci-release-node-lts

Conversation

@wyattjoh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Switch node-version from "22" to "lts/*" in both publish-npm and canary-publish-npm jobs
  • Remove the npm install -g npm@11 upgrade step (Node 24 LTS ships npm 11 already)

Why

node:22 resolved to Node 22.22.2, which ships with a broken bundled npm (missing promise-retry in its internal dependency tree). This caused the upgrade step to fail before any publishing could happen. Node 24 LTS (lts/*) does not have this issue and already includes npm 11.

Node 22.22.2 (the latest node:22 image) ships with a broken bundled npm
(missing promise-retry) that causes npm install -g npm@11 to fail before
publishing. Switch to lts/* so both publish-npm and canary-publish-npm
always run on the latest LTS (currently Node 24), which bundles npm 11
and no longer needs the manual upgrade step.
@wyattjoh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Apr 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 42c0927d-4aba-4e85-8a05-9a68d1ada584

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1bfbec1 and e160dc0.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/snapshot.yml

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Updated GitHub Actions workflows to use node-version: "lts/*" instead of the pinned "22" in publish jobs across .github/workflows/release.yml and .github/workflows/snapshot.yml. Removed explicit npm upgrade steps (npm install -g npm@11) from the affected publish jobs. The workflows continue to use oven-sh/setup-bun@v2, run bun install --frozen-lockfile, and invoke the same bun run release / bun run release:canary / bun run release:snapshot publish commands.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Title check✅ PassedThe title 'fix(ci): upgrade npm publish jobs to Node.js LTS' accurately describes the main changes in the pull request: switching Node.js version from 22 to LTS in publish jobs.
Description check✅ PassedThe description clearly explains the changes (switching node-version to 'lts/*' and removing npm upgrade step) and provides relevant context about the underlying issue with Node 22's bundled npm.
Docstring Coverage✅ PassedNo functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Same broken npm issue as release.yml — node:22 resolved to 22.22.2
with a broken bundled npm. Switch to lts/* and drop the manual upgrade
step, which Node 24 LTS makes unnecessary.
- uses: actions/setup-node@v6
with:
node-version: "22"
node-version: "lts/*"

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Isn't "lts/krypton" safer, since this will just resolve to whatever is the newest LTS, but eventually that will be Node 26 or whatever.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is just to enable the npm publish flow, so getting the latest LTS version of that should be ok I'd think!

@wyattjoh
wyattjoh merged commit f9be436 into mainApr 9, 2026
6 checks passed
@wyattjoh
wyattjoh deleted the fix/ci-release-node-lts branch April 9, 2026 21:01
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@wyattjoh@alexcarpenter@dmoerner
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix(ci): upgrade npm publish jobs to Node.js LTS - #139

Merged
wyattjoh merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/ci-release-node-lts
Apr 9, 2026
Merged

fix(ci): upgrade npm publish jobs to Node.js LTS#139
wyattjoh merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/ci-release-node-lts

Conversation

@wyattjoh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Switch node-version from "22" to "lts/*" in both publish-npm and canary-publish-npm jobs
  • Remove the npm install -g npm@11 upgrade step (Node 24 LTS ships npm 11 already)

Why

node:22 resolved to Node 22.22.2, which ships with a broken bundled npm (missing promise-retry in its internal dependency tree). This caused the upgrade step to fail before any publishing could happen. Node 24 LTS (lts/*) does not have this issue and already includes npm 11.

Node 22.22.2 (the latest node:22 image) ships with a broken bundled npm
(missing promise-retry) that causes npm install -g npm@11 to fail before
publishing. Switch to lts/* so both publish-npm and canary-publish-npm
always run on the latest LTS (currently Node 24), which bundles npm 11
and no longer needs the manual upgrade step.
@wyattjoh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Apr 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 42c0927d-4aba-4e85-8a05-9a68d1ada584

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1bfbec1 and e160dc0.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/snapshot.yml

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Updated GitHub Actions workflows to use node-version: "lts/*" instead of the pinned "22" in publish jobs across .github/workflows/release.yml and .github/workflows/snapshot.yml. Removed explicit npm upgrade steps (npm install -g npm@11) from the affected publish jobs. The workflows continue to use oven-sh/setup-bun@v2, run bun install --frozen-lockfile, and invoke the same bun run release / bun run release:canary / bun run release:snapshot publish commands.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Title check✅ PassedThe title 'fix(ci): upgrade npm publish jobs to Node.js LTS' accurately describes the main changes in the pull request: switching Node.js version from 22 to LTS in publish jobs.
Description check✅ PassedThe description clearly explains the changes (switching node-version to 'lts/*' and removing npm upgrade step) and provides relevant context about the underlying issue with Node 22's bundled npm.
Docstring Coverage✅ PassedNo functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Same broken npm issue as release.yml — node:22 resolved to 22.22.2
with a broken bundled npm. Switch to lts/* and drop the manual upgrade
step, which Node 24 LTS makes unnecessary.
- uses: actions/setup-node@v6
with:
node-version: "22"
node-version: "lts/*"

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Isn't "lts/krypton" safer, since this will just resolve to whatever is the newest LTS, but eventually that will be Node 26 or whatever.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is just to enable the npm publish flow, so getting the latest LTS version of that should be ok I'd think!

@wyattjoh
wyattjoh merged commit f9be436 into mainApr 9, 2026
6 checks passed
@wyattjoh
wyattjoh deleted the fix/ci-release-node-lts branch April 9, 2026 21:01
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@wyattjoh@alexcarpenter@dmoerner
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix(ci): upgrade npm publish jobs to Node.js LTS - #139

Merged
wyattjoh merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/ci-release-node-lts
Apr 9, 2026
Merged

fix(ci): upgrade npm publish jobs to Node.js LTS#139
wyattjoh merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/ci-release-node-lts

Conversation

@wyattjoh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Switch node-version from "22" to "lts/*" in both publish-npm and canary-publish-npm jobs
  • Remove the npm install -g npm@11 upgrade step (Node 24 LTS ships npm 11 already)

Why

node:22 resolved to Node 22.22.2, which ships with a broken bundled npm (missing promise-retry in its internal dependency tree). This caused the upgrade step to fail before any publishing could happen. Node 24 LTS (lts/*) does not have this issue and already includes npm 11.

Node 22.22.2 (the latest node:22 image) ships with a broken bundled npm
(missing promise-retry) that causes npm install -g npm@11 to fail before
publishing. Switch to lts/* so both publish-npm and canary-publish-npm
always run on the latest LTS (currently Node 24), which bundles npm 11
and no longer needs the manual upgrade step.
@wyattjoh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Apr 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 42c0927d-4aba-4e85-8a05-9a68d1ada584

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1bfbec1 and e160dc0.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/snapshot.yml

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Updated GitHub Actions workflows to use node-version: "lts/*" instead of the pinned "22" in publish jobs across .github/workflows/release.yml and .github/workflows/snapshot.yml. Removed explicit npm upgrade steps (npm install -g npm@11) from the affected publish jobs. The workflows continue to use oven-sh/setup-bun@v2, run bun install --frozen-lockfile, and invoke the same bun run release / bun run release:canary / bun run release:snapshot publish commands.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Title check✅ PassedThe title 'fix(ci): upgrade npm publish jobs to Node.js LTS' accurately describes the main changes in the pull request: switching Node.js version from 22 to LTS in publish jobs.
Description check✅ PassedThe description clearly explains the changes (switching node-version to 'lts/*' and removing npm upgrade step) and provides relevant context about the underlying issue with Node 22's bundled npm.
Docstring Coverage✅ PassedNo functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Same broken npm issue as release.yml — node:22 resolved to 22.22.2
with a broken bundled npm. Switch to lts/* and drop the manual upgrade
step, which Node 24 LTS makes unnecessary.
- uses: actions/setup-node@v6
with:
node-version: "22"
node-version: "lts/*"

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Isn't "lts/krypton" safer, since this will just resolve to whatever is the newest LTS, but eventually that will be Node 26 or whatever.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is just to enable the npm publish flow, so getting the latest LTS version of that should be ok I'd think!

@wyattjoh
wyattjoh merged commit f9be436 into mainApr 9, 2026
6 checks passed
@wyattjoh
wyattjoh deleted the fix/ci-release-node-lts branch April 9, 2026 21:01
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@wyattjoh@alexcarpenter@dmoerner
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

fix(ci): upgrade npm publish jobs to Node.js LTS - #139

Merged
wyattjoh merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/ci-release-node-lts
Apr 9, 2026
Merged

fix(ci): upgrade npm publish jobs to Node.js LTS#139
wyattjoh merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/ci-release-node-lts

Conversation

@wyattjoh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Switch node-version from "22" to "lts/*" in both publish-npm and canary-publish-npm jobs
  • Remove the npm install -g npm@11 upgrade step (Node 24 LTS ships npm 11 already)

Why

node:22 resolved to Node 22.22.2, which ships with a broken bundled npm (missing promise-retry in its internal dependency tree). This caused the upgrade step to fail before any publishing could happen. Node 24 LTS (lts/*) does not have this issue and already includes npm 11.

Node 22.22.2 (the latest node:22 image) ships with a broken bundled npm
(missing promise-retry) that causes npm install -g npm@11 to fail before
publishing. Switch to lts/* so both publish-npm and canary-publish-npm
always run on the latest LTS (currently Node 24), which bundles npm 11
and no longer needs the manual upgrade step.
@wyattjoh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Apr 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 42c0927d-4aba-4e85-8a05-9a68d1ada584

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1bfbec1 and e160dc0.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/snapshot.yml

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Updated GitHub Actions workflows to use node-version: "lts/*" instead of the pinned "22" in publish jobs across .github/workflows/release.yml and .github/workflows/snapshot.yml. Removed explicit npm upgrade steps (npm install -g npm@11) from the affected publish jobs. The workflows continue to use oven-sh/setup-bun@v2, run bun install --frozen-lockfile, and invoke the same bun run release / bun run release:canary / bun run release:snapshot publish commands.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Title check✅ PassedThe title 'fix(ci): upgrade npm publish jobs to Node.js LTS' accurately describes the main changes in the pull request: switching Node.js version from 22 to LTS in publish jobs.
Description check✅ PassedThe description clearly explains the changes (switching node-version to 'lts/*' and removing npm upgrade step) and provides relevant context about the underlying issue with Node 22's bundled npm.
Docstring Coverage✅ PassedNo functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Same broken npm issue as release.yml — node:22 resolved to 22.22.2
with a broken bundled npm. Switch to lts/* and drop the manual upgrade
step, which Node 24 LTS makes unnecessary.
- uses: actions/setup-node@v6
with:
node-version: "22"
node-version: "lts/*"

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Isn't "lts/krypton" safer, since this will just resolve to whatever is the newest LTS, but eventually that will be Node 26 or whatever.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is just to enable the npm publish flow, so getting the latest LTS version of that should be ok I'd think!

@wyattjoh
wyattjoh merged commit f9be436 into mainApr 9, 2026
6 checks passed
@wyattjoh
wyattjoh deleted the fix/ci-release-node-lts branch April 9, 2026 21:01
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@wyattjoh@alexcarpenter@dmoerner
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix(ci): upgrade npm publish jobs to Node.js LTS - #139

Merged
wyattjoh merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/ci-release-node-lts
Apr 9, 2026
Merged

fix(ci): upgrade npm publish jobs to Node.js LTS#139
wyattjoh merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/ci-release-node-lts

Conversation

@wyattjoh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Switch node-version from "22" to "lts/*" in both publish-npm and canary-publish-npm jobs
  • Remove the npm install -g npm@11 upgrade step (Node 24 LTS ships npm 11 already)

Why

node:22 resolved to Node 22.22.2, which ships with a broken bundled npm (missing promise-retry in its internal dependency tree). This caused the upgrade step to fail before any publishing could happen. Node 24 LTS (lts/*) does not have this issue and already includes npm 11.

Node 22.22.2 (the latest node:22 image) ships with a broken bundled npm
(missing promise-retry) that causes npm install -g npm@11 to fail before
publishing. Switch to lts/* so both publish-npm and canary-publish-npm
always run on the latest LTS (currently Node 24), which bundles npm 11
and no longer needs the manual upgrade step.
@wyattjoh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Apr 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 42c0927d-4aba-4e85-8a05-9a68d1ada584

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1bfbec1 and e160dc0.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/snapshot.yml

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Updated GitHub Actions workflows to use node-version: "lts/*" instead of the pinned "22" in publish jobs across .github/workflows/release.yml and .github/workflows/snapshot.yml. Removed explicit npm upgrade steps (npm install -g npm@11) from the affected publish jobs. The workflows continue to use oven-sh/setup-bun@v2, run bun install --frozen-lockfile, and invoke the same bun run release / bun run release:canary / bun run release:snapshot publish commands.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Title check✅ PassedThe title 'fix(ci): upgrade npm publish jobs to Node.js LTS' accurately describes the main changes in the pull request: switching Node.js version from 22 to LTS in publish jobs.
Description check✅ PassedThe description clearly explains the changes (switching node-version to 'lts/*' and removing npm upgrade step) and provides relevant context about the underlying issue with Node 22's bundled npm.
Docstring Coverage✅ PassedNo functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Same broken npm issue as release.yml — node:22 resolved to 22.22.2
with a broken bundled npm. Switch to lts/* and drop the manual upgrade
step, which Node 24 LTS makes unnecessary.
- uses: actions/setup-node@v6
with:
node-version: "22"
node-version: "lts/*"

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Isn't "lts/krypton" safer, since this will just resolve to whatever is the newest LTS, but eventually that will be Node 26 or whatever.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is just to enable the npm publish flow, so getting the latest LTS version of that should be ok I'd think!

@wyattjoh
wyattjoh merged commit f9be436 into mainApr 9, 2026
6 checks passed
@wyattjoh
wyattjoh deleted the fix/ci-release-node-lts branch April 9, 2026 21:01
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@wyattjoh@alexcarpenter@dmoerner
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix(ci): upgrade npm publish jobs to Node.js LTS - #139

Merged
wyattjoh merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/ci-release-node-lts
Apr 9, 2026
Merged

fix(ci): upgrade npm publish jobs to Node.js LTS#139
wyattjoh merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/ci-release-node-lts

Conversation

@wyattjoh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Switch node-version from "22" to "lts/*" in both publish-npm and canary-publish-npm jobs
  • Remove the npm install -g npm@11 upgrade step (Node 24 LTS ships npm 11 already)

Why

node:22 resolved to Node 22.22.2, which ships with a broken bundled npm (missing promise-retry in its internal dependency tree). This caused the upgrade step to fail before any publishing could happen. Node 24 LTS (lts/*) does not have this issue and already includes npm 11.

Node 22.22.2 (the latest node:22 image) ships with a broken bundled npm
(missing promise-retry) that causes npm install -g npm@11 to fail before
publishing. Switch to lts/* so both publish-npm and canary-publish-npm
always run on the latest LTS (currently Node 24), which bundles npm 11
and no longer needs the manual upgrade step.
@wyattjoh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Apr 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 42c0927d-4aba-4e85-8a05-9a68d1ada584

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1bfbec1 and e160dc0.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/snapshot.yml

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Updated GitHub Actions workflows to use node-version: "lts/*" instead of the pinned "22" in publish jobs across .github/workflows/release.yml and .github/workflows/snapshot.yml. Removed explicit npm upgrade steps (npm install -g npm@11) from the affected publish jobs. The workflows continue to use oven-sh/setup-bun@v2, run bun install --frozen-lockfile, and invoke the same bun run release / bun run release:canary / bun run release:snapshot publish commands.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Title check✅ PassedThe title 'fix(ci): upgrade npm publish jobs to Node.js LTS' accurately describes the main changes in the pull request: switching Node.js version from 22 to LTS in publish jobs.
Description check✅ PassedThe description clearly explains the changes (switching node-version to 'lts/*' and removing npm upgrade step) and provides relevant context about the underlying issue with Node 22's bundled npm.
Docstring Coverage✅ PassedNo functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Same broken npm issue as release.yml — node:22 resolved to 22.22.2
with a broken bundled npm. Switch to lts/* and drop the manual upgrade
step, which Node 24 LTS makes unnecessary.
- uses: actions/setup-node@v6
with:
node-version: "22"
node-version: "lts/*"

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Isn't "lts/krypton" safer, since this will just resolve to whatever is the newest LTS, but eventually that will be Node 26 or whatever.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is just to enable the npm publish flow, so getting the latest LTS version of that should be ok I'd think!

@wyattjoh
wyattjoh merged commit f9be436 into mainApr 9, 2026
6 checks passed
@wyattjoh
wyattjoh deleted the fix/ci-release-node-lts branch April 9, 2026 21:01
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@wyattjoh@alexcarpenter@dmoerner
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

fix(ci): upgrade npm publish jobs to Node.js LTS - #139

Merged
wyattjoh merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/ci-release-node-lts
Apr 9, 2026
Merged

fix(ci): upgrade npm publish jobs to Node.js LTS#139
wyattjoh merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/ci-release-node-lts

Conversation

@wyattjoh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Switch node-version from "22" to "lts/*" in both publish-npm and canary-publish-npm jobs
  • Remove the npm install -g npm@11 upgrade step (Node 24 LTS ships npm 11 already)

Why

node:22 resolved to Node 22.22.2, which ships with a broken bundled npm (missing promise-retry in its internal dependency tree). This caused the upgrade step to fail before any publishing could happen. Node 24 LTS (lts/*) does not have this issue and already includes npm 11.

Node 22.22.2 (the latest node:22 image) ships with a broken bundled npm
(missing promise-retry) that causes npm install -g npm@11 to fail before
publishing. Switch to lts/* so both publish-npm and canary-publish-npm
always run on the latest LTS (currently Node 24), which bundles npm 11
and no longer needs the manual upgrade step.
@wyattjoh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Apr 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 42c0927d-4aba-4e85-8a05-9a68d1ada584

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1bfbec1 and e160dc0.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/snapshot.yml

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Updated GitHub Actions workflows to use node-version: "lts/*" instead of the pinned "22" in publish jobs across .github/workflows/release.yml and .github/workflows/snapshot.yml. Removed explicit npm upgrade steps (npm install -g npm@11) from the affected publish jobs. The workflows continue to use oven-sh/setup-bun@v2, run bun install --frozen-lockfile, and invoke the same bun run release / bun run release:canary / bun run release:snapshot publish commands.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Title check✅ PassedThe title 'fix(ci): upgrade npm publish jobs to Node.js LTS' accurately describes the main changes in the pull request: switching Node.js version from 22 to LTS in publish jobs.
Description check✅ PassedThe description clearly explains the changes (switching node-version to 'lts/*' and removing npm upgrade step) and provides relevant context about the underlying issue with Node 22's bundled npm.
Docstring Coverage✅ PassedNo functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Same broken npm issue as release.yml — node:22 resolved to 22.22.2
with a broken bundled npm. Switch to lts/* and drop the manual upgrade
step, which Node 24 LTS makes unnecessary.
- uses: actions/setup-node@v6
with:
node-version: "22"
node-version: "lts/*"

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Isn't "lts/krypton" safer, since this will just resolve to whatever is the newest LTS, but eventually that will be Node 26 or whatever.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is just to enable the npm publish flow, so getting the latest LTS version of that should be ok I'd think!

@wyattjoh
wyattjoh merged commit f9be436 into mainApr 9, 2026
6 checks passed
@wyattjoh
wyattjoh deleted the fix/ci-release-node-lts branch April 9, 2026 21:01
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@wyattjoh@alexcarpenter@dmoerner