Skip to content

chore(backend): Limit exposed token verification related errors - #2189

Merged
tmilewski merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/limit-token-error-exports
Dec 7, 2023
Merged

chore(backend): Limit exposed token verification related errors#2189
tmilewski merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/limit-token-error-exports

Conversation

@tmilewski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

Removes both TokenVerificationErrorAction & TokenVerificationErrorCode from @clerk/backend exports as both are internal.

It also happens to support @flawnn's work/use-case in #1980, once we backport to release/v4.

Checklist

  • npm test runs as expected.
  • npm run build runs as expected.
  • (If applicable) JSDoc comments have been added or updated for any package exports
  • (If applicable) Documentation has been updated

Type of change

  • 🐛 Bug fix
  • 🌟 New feature
  • 🔨 Breaking change
  • 📖 Refactoring / dependency upgrade / documentation
  • other:

Packages affected

  • @clerk/backend
  • @clerk/chrome-extension
  • @clerk/clerk-js
  • @clerk/clerk-expo
  • @clerk/fastify
  • gatsby-plugin-clerk
  • @clerk/localizations
  • @clerk/nextjs
  • @clerk/clerk-react
  • @clerk/remix
  • @clerk/clerk-sdk-node
  • @clerk/shared
  • @clerk/themes
  • @clerk/types
  • build/tooling/chore

Co-authored-by: flawnn <fl4wn@protonmail.com>
@tmilewskitmilewski self-assigned this Nov 22, 2023
@changeset-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 5410436

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 6 packages
NameType
@clerk/clerk-sdk-nodeMajor
@clerk/backendMajor
@clerk/nextjsMajor
@clerk/remixMajor
gatsby-plugin-clerkPatch
@clerk/fastifyPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@dimkldimkl left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❓ How is dropping those 2 exports going to resolve the use case of user of catching and handling those errors? I think i got confused. 😓

@tmilewski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@dimkl It doesn't. A comment in the other PR suggested we wanted to keep some of these exports internal. This PR aims to narrow the scope of the exports on main. When backporting this to release/v4, it will enable access only to these narrowed exports which aren't currently exported at all.

@dimkl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I would suggest we close this PR because in the context of the Public APIs RFC we are going to change the exports of the @clerk/backend and probably export a @clerk/backend/errors subpath with the errors that we want to expose.
Also, I would suggest we keep those errors exported (from the /errors subpath) since the customer use case seems valid.

export { AuthStatus } from './authStatus';
export type { RequestState } from './authStatus';
export * from './errors';
export { TokenVerificationError, TokenVerificationErrorReason } from './errors';

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@tmilewski As the discussion about the error-related exports for v5 is still ongoing, I think we need to do the following:

  • export the requested error from release/v4
  • remove export * from './errors' from here
  • revisit this then we make a decision

@tmilewski
tmilewski added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 7, 2023
Merged via the queue into main with commit e1f7eaeDec 7, 2023
@tmilewski
tmilewski deleted the chore/limit-token-error-exports branch December 7, 2023 15:10
octoper pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@tmilewski@dimkl@nikosdouvlis@clerk-cookie
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
chore(backend): Limit exposed token verification related errors by tmilewski · Pull Request #2189 · clerk/javascript · GitHub
Skip to content

chore(backend): Limit exposed token verification related errors - #2189

Merged
tmilewski merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/limit-token-error-exports
Dec 7, 2023
Merged

chore(backend): Limit exposed token verification related errors#2189
tmilewski merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/limit-token-error-exports

Conversation

@tmilewski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

Removes both TokenVerificationErrorAction & TokenVerificationErrorCode from @clerk/backend exports as both are internal.

It also happens to support @flawnn's work/use-case in #1980, once we backport to release/v4.

Checklist

  • npm test runs as expected.
  • npm run build runs as expected.
  • (If applicable) JSDoc comments have been added or updated for any package exports
  • (If applicable) Documentation has been updated

Type of change

  • 🐛 Bug fix
  • 🌟 New feature
  • 🔨 Breaking change
  • 📖 Refactoring / dependency upgrade / documentation
  • other:

Packages affected

  • @clerk/backend
  • @clerk/chrome-extension
  • @clerk/clerk-js
  • @clerk/clerk-expo
  • @clerk/fastify
  • gatsby-plugin-clerk
  • @clerk/localizations
  • @clerk/nextjs
  • @clerk/clerk-react
  • @clerk/remix
  • @clerk/clerk-sdk-node
  • @clerk/shared
  • @clerk/themes
  • @clerk/types
  • build/tooling/chore

Co-authored-by: flawnn <fl4wn@protonmail.com>
@tmilewskitmilewski self-assigned this Nov 22, 2023
@changeset-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 5410436

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 6 packages
NameType
@clerk/clerk-sdk-nodeMajor
@clerk/backendMajor
@clerk/nextjsMajor
@clerk/remixMajor
gatsby-plugin-clerkPatch
@clerk/fastifyPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@dimkldimkl left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❓ How is dropping those 2 exports going to resolve the use case of user of catching and handling those errors? I think i got confused. 😓

@tmilewski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@dimkl It doesn't. A comment in the other PR suggested we wanted to keep some of these exports internal. This PR aims to narrow the scope of the exports on main. When backporting this to release/v4, it will enable access only to these narrowed exports which aren't currently exported at all.

@dimkl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I would suggest we close this PR because in the context of the Public APIs RFC we are going to change the exports of the @clerk/backend and probably export a @clerk/backend/errors subpath with the errors that we want to expose.
Also, I would suggest we keep those errors exported (from the /errors subpath) since the customer use case seems valid.

export { AuthStatus } from './authStatus';
export type { RequestState } from './authStatus';
export * from './errors';
export { TokenVerificationError, TokenVerificationErrorReason } from './errors';

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@tmilewski As the discussion about the error-related exports for v5 is still ongoing, I think we need to do the following:

  • export the requested error from release/v4
  • remove export * from './errors' from here
  • revisit this then we make a decision

@tmilewski
tmilewski added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 7, 2023
Merged via the queue into main with commit e1f7eaeDec 7, 2023
@tmilewski
tmilewski deleted the chore/limit-token-error-exports branch December 7, 2023 15:10
octoper pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@tmilewski@dimkl@nikosdouvlis@clerk-cookie
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' chore(backend): Limit exposed token verification related errors by tmilewski · Pull Request #2189 · clerk/javascript · GitHub
Skip to content

chore(backend): Limit exposed token verification related errors - #2189

Merged
tmilewski merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/limit-token-error-exports
Dec 7, 2023
Merged

chore(backend): Limit exposed token verification related errors#2189
tmilewski merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/limit-token-error-exports

Conversation

@tmilewski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

Removes both TokenVerificationErrorAction & TokenVerificationErrorCode from @clerk/backend exports as both are internal.

It also happens to support @flawnn's work/use-case in #1980, once we backport to release/v4.

Checklist

  • npm test runs as expected.
  • npm run build runs as expected.
  • (If applicable) JSDoc comments have been added or updated for any package exports
  • (If applicable) Documentation has been updated

Type of change

  • 🐛 Bug fix
  • 🌟 New feature
  • 🔨 Breaking change
  • 📖 Refactoring / dependency upgrade / documentation
  • other:

Packages affected

  • @clerk/backend
  • @clerk/chrome-extension
  • @clerk/clerk-js
  • @clerk/clerk-expo
  • @clerk/fastify
  • gatsby-plugin-clerk
  • @clerk/localizations
  • @clerk/nextjs
  • @clerk/clerk-react
  • @clerk/remix
  • @clerk/clerk-sdk-node
  • @clerk/shared
  • @clerk/themes
  • @clerk/types
  • build/tooling/chore

Co-authored-by: flawnn <fl4wn@protonmail.com>
@tmilewskitmilewski self-assigned this Nov 22, 2023
@changeset-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 5410436

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 6 packages
NameType
@clerk/clerk-sdk-nodeMajor
@clerk/backendMajor
@clerk/nextjsMajor
@clerk/remixMajor
gatsby-plugin-clerkPatch
@clerk/fastifyPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@dimkldimkl left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❓ How is dropping those 2 exports going to resolve the use case of user of catching and handling those errors? I think i got confused. 😓

@tmilewski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@dimkl It doesn't. A comment in the other PR suggested we wanted to keep some of these exports internal. This PR aims to narrow the scope of the exports on main. When backporting this to release/v4, it will enable access only to these narrowed exports which aren't currently exported at all.

@dimkl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I would suggest we close this PR because in the context of the Public APIs RFC we are going to change the exports of the @clerk/backend and probably export a @clerk/backend/errors subpath with the errors that we want to expose.
Also, I would suggest we keep those errors exported (from the /errors subpath) since the customer use case seems valid.

export { AuthStatus } from './authStatus';
export type { RequestState } from './authStatus';
export * from './errors';
export { TokenVerificationError, TokenVerificationErrorReason } from './errors';

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@tmilewski As the discussion about the error-related exports for v5 is still ongoing, I think we need to do the following:

  • export the requested error from release/v4
  • remove export * from './errors' from here
  • revisit this then we make a decision

@tmilewski
tmilewski added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 7, 2023
Merged via the queue into main with commit e1f7eaeDec 7, 2023
@tmilewski
tmilewski deleted the chore/limit-token-error-exports branch December 7, 2023 15:10
octoper pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@tmilewski@dimkl@nikosdouvlis@clerk-cookie
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' chore(backend): Limit exposed token verification related errors by tmilewski · Pull Request #2189 · clerk/javascript · GitHub
Skip to content

chore(backend): Limit exposed token verification related errors - #2189

Merged
tmilewski merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/limit-token-error-exports
Dec 7, 2023
Merged

chore(backend): Limit exposed token verification related errors#2189
tmilewski merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/limit-token-error-exports

Conversation

@tmilewski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

Removes both TokenVerificationErrorAction & TokenVerificationErrorCode from @clerk/backend exports as both are internal.

It also happens to support @flawnn's work/use-case in #1980, once we backport to release/v4.

Checklist

  • npm test runs as expected.
  • npm run build runs as expected.
  • (If applicable) JSDoc comments have been added or updated for any package exports
  • (If applicable) Documentation has been updated

Type of change

  • 🐛 Bug fix
  • 🌟 New feature
  • 🔨 Breaking change
  • 📖 Refactoring / dependency upgrade / documentation
  • other:

Packages affected

  • @clerk/backend
  • @clerk/chrome-extension
  • @clerk/clerk-js
  • @clerk/clerk-expo
  • @clerk/fastify
  • gatsby-plugin-clerk
  • @clerk/localizations
  • @clerk/nextjs
  • @clerk/clerk-react
  • @clerk/remix
  • @clerk/clerk-sdk-node
  • @clerk/shared
  • @clerk/themes
  • @clerk/types
  • build/tooling/chore

Co-authored-by: flawnn <fl4wn@protonmail.com>
@tmilewskitmilewski self-assigned this Nov 22, 2023
@changeset-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 5410436

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 6 packages
NameType
@clerk/clerk-sdk-nodeMajor
@clerk/backendMajor
@clerk/nextjsMajor
@clerk/remixMajor
gatsby-plugin-clerkPatch
@clerk/fastifyPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@dimkldimkl left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❓ How is dropping those 2 exports going to resolve the use case of user of catching and handling those errors? I think i got confused. 😓

@tmilewski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@dimkl It doesn't. A comment in the other PR suggested we wanted to keep some of these exports internal. This PR aims to narrow the scope of the exports on main. When backporting this to release/v4, it will enable access only to these narrowed exports which aren't currently exported at all.

@dimkl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I would suggest we close this PR because in the context of the Public APIs RFC we are going to change the exports of the @clerk/backend and probably export a @clerk/backend/errors subpath with the errors that we want to expose.
Also, I would suggest we keep those errors exported (from the /errors subpath) since the customer use case seems valid.

export { AuthStatus } from './authStatus';
export type { RequestState } from './authStatus';
export * from './errors';
export { TokenVerificationError, TokenVerificationErrorReason } from './errors';

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@tmilewski As the discussion about the error-related exports for v5 is still ongoing, I think we need to do the following:

  • export the requested error from release/v4
  • remove export * from './errors' from here
  • revisit this then we make a decision

@tmilewski
tmilewski added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 7, 2023
Merged via the queue into main with commit e1f7eaeDec 7, 2023
@tmilewski
tmilewski deleted the chore/limit-token-error-exports branch December 7, 2023 15:10
octoper pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@tmilewski@dimkl@nikosdouvlis@clerk-cookie
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' chore(backend): Limit exposed token verification related errors by tmilewski · Pull Request #2189 · clerk/javascript · GitHub
Skip to content

chore(backend): Limit exposed token verification related errors - #2189

Merged
tmilewski merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/limit-token-error-exports
Dec 7, 2023
Merged

chore(backend): Limit exposed token verification related errors#2189
tmilewski merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/limit-token-error-exports

Conversation

@tmilewski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

Removes both TokenVerificationErrorAction & TokenVerificationErrorCode from @clerk/backend exports as both are internal.

It also happens to support @flawnn's work/use-case in #1980, once we backport to release/v4.

Checklist

  • npm test runs as expected.
  • npm run build runs as expected.
  • (If applicable) JSDoc comments have been added or updated for any package exports
  • (If applicable) Documentation has been updated

Type of change

  • 🐛 Bug fix
  • 🌟 New feature
  • 🔨 Breaking change
  • 📖 Refactoring / dependency upgrade / documentation
  • other:

Packages affected

  • @clerk/backend
  • @clerk/chrome-extension
  • @clerk/clerk-js
  • @clerk/clerk-expo
  • @clerk/fastify
  • gatsby-plugin-clerk
  • @clerk/localizations
  • @clerk/nextjs
  • @clerk/clerk-react
  • @clerk/remix
  • @clerk/clerk-sdk-node
  • @clerk/shared
  • @clerk/themes
  • @clerk/types
  • build/tooling/chore

Co-authored-by: flawnn <fl4wn@protonmail.com>
@tmilewskitmilewski self-assigned this Nov 22, 2023
@changeset-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 5410436

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 6 packages
NameType
@clerk/clerk-sdk-nodeMajor
@clerk/backendMajor
@clerk/nextjsMajor
@clerk/remixMajor
gatsby-plugin-clerkPatch
@clerk/fastifyPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@dimkldimkl left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❓ How is dropping those 2 exports going to resolve the use case of user of catching and handling those errors? I think i got confused. 😓

@tmilewski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@dimkl It doesn't. A comment in the other PR suggested we wanted to keep some of these exports internal. This PR aims to narrow the scope of the exports on main. When backporting this to release/v4, it will enable access only to these narrowed exports which aren't currently exported at all.

@dimkl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I would suggest we close this PR because in the context of the Public APIs RFC we are going to change the exports of the @clerk/backend and probably export a @clerk/backend/errors subpath with the errors that we want to expose.
Also, I would suggest we keep those errors exported (from the /errors subpath) since the customer use case seems valid.

export { AuthStatus } from './authStatus';
export type { RequestState } from './authStatus';
export * from './errors';
export { TokenVerificationError, TokenVerificationErrorReason } from './errors';

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@tmilewski As the discussion about the error-related exports for v5 is still ongoing, I think we need to do the following:

  • export the requested error from release/v4
  • remove export * from './errors' from here
  • revisit this then we make a decision

@tmilewski
tmilewski added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 7, 2023
Merged via the queue into main with commit e1f7eaeDec 7, 2023
@tmilewski
tmilewski deleted the chore/limit-token-error-exports branch December 7, 2023 15:10
octoper pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@tmilewski@dimkl@nikosdouvlis@clerk-cookie
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' chore(backend): Limit exposed token verification related errors by tmilewski · Pull Request #2189 · clerk/javascript · GitHub
Skip to content

chore(backend): Limit exposed token verification related errors - #2189

Merged
tmilewski merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/limit-token-error-exports
Dec 7, 2023
Merged

chore(backend): Limit exposed token verification related errors#2189
tmilewski merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/limit-token-error-exports

Conversation

@tmilewski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

Removes both TokenVerificationErrorAction & TokenVerificationErrorCode from @clerk/backend exports as both are internal.

It also happens to support @flawnn's work/use-case in #1980, once we backport to release/v4.

Checklist

  • npm test runs as expected.
  • npm run build runs as expected.
  • (If applicable) JSDoc comments have been added or updated for any package exports
  • (If applicable) Documentation has been updated

Type of change

  • 🐛 Bug fix
  • 🌟 New feature
  • 🔨 Breaking change
  • 📖 Refactoring / dependency upgrade / documentation
  • other:

Packages affected

  • @clerk/backend
  • @clerk/chrome-extension
  • @clerk/clerk-js
  • @clerk/clerk-expo
  • @clerk/fastify
  • gatsby-plugin-clerk
  • @clerk/localizations
  • @clerk/nextjs
  • @clerk/clerk-react
  • @clerk/remix
  • @clerk/clerk-sdk-node
  • @clerk/shared
  • @clerk/themes
  • @clerk/types
  • build/tooling/chore

Co-authored-by: flawnn <fl4wn@protonmail.com>
@tmilewskitmilewski self-assigned this Nov 22, 2023
@changeset-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 5410436

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 6 packages
NameType
@clerk/clerk-sdk-nodeMajor
@clerk/backendMajor
@clerk/nextjsMajor
@clerk/remixMajor
gatsby-plugin-clerkPatch
@clerk/fastifyPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@dimkldimkl left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❓ How is dropping those 2 exports going to resolve the use case of user of catching and handling those errors? I think i got confused. 😓

@tmilewski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@dimkl It doesn't. A comment in the other PR suggested we wanted to keep some of these exports internal. This PR aims to narrow the scope of the exports on main. When backporting this to release/v4, it will enable access only to these narrowed exports which aren't currently exported at all.

@dimkl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I would suggest we close this PR because in the context of the Public APIs RFC we are going to change the exports of the @clerk/backend and probably export a @clerk/backend/errors subpath with the errors that we want to expose.
Also, I would suggest we keep those errors exported (from the /errors subpath) since the customer use case seems valid.

export { AuthStatus } from './authStatus';
export type { RequestState } from './authStatus';
export * from './errors';
export { TokenVerificationError, TokenVerificationErrorReason } from './errors';

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@tmilewski As the discussion about the error-related exports for v5 is still ongoing, I think we need to do the following:

  • export the requested error from release/v4
  • remove export * from './errors' from here
  • revisit this then we make a decision

@tmilewski
tmilewski added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 7, 2023
Merged via the queue into main with commit e1f7eaeDec 7, 2023
@tmilewski
tmilewski deleted the chore/limit-token-error-exports branch December 7, 2023 15:10
octoper pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@tmilewski@dimkl@nikosdouvlis@clerk-cookie
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' chore(backend): Limit exposed token verification related errors by tmilewski · Pull Request #2189 · clerk/javascript · GitHub
Skip to content

chore(backend): Limit exposed token verification related errors - #2189

Merged
tmilewski merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/limit-token-error-exports
Dec 7, 2023
Merged

chore(backend): Limit exposed token verification related errors#2189
tmilewski merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/limit-token-error-exports

Conversation

@tmilewski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

Removes both TokenVerificationErrorAction & TokenVerificationErrorCode from @clerk/backend exports as both are internal.

It also happens to support @flawnn's work/use-case in #1980, once we backport to release/v4.

Checklist

  • npm test runs as expected.
  • npm run build runs as expected.
  • (If applicable) JSDoc comments have been added or updated for any package exports
  • (If applicable) Documentation has been updated

Type of change

  • 🐛 Bug fix
  • 🌟 New feature
  • 🔨 Breaking change
  • 📖 Refactoring / dependency upgrade / documentation
  • other:

Packages affected

  • @clerk/backend
  • @clerk/chrome-extension
  • @clerk/clerk-js
  • @clerk/clerk-expo
  • @clerk/fastify
  • gatsby-plugin-clerk
  • @clerk/localizations
  • @clerk/nextjs
  • @clerk/clerk-react
  • @clerk/remix
  • @clerk/clerk-sdk-node
  • @clerk/shared
  • @clerk/themes
  • @clerk/types
  • build/tooling/chore

Co-authored-by: flawnn <fl4wn@protonmail.com>
@tmilewskitmilewski self-assigned this Nov 22, 2023
@changeset-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 5410436

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 6 packages
NameType
@clerk/clerk-sdk-nodeMajor
@clerk/backendMajor
@clerk/nextjsMajor
@clerk/remixMajor
gatsby-plugin-clerkPatch
@clerk/fastifyPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@dimkldimkl left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❓ How is dropping those 2 exports going to resolve the use case of user of catching and handling those errors? I think i got confused. 😓

@tmilewski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@dimkl It doesn't. A comment in the other PR suggested we wanted to keep some of these exports internal. This PR aims to narrow the scope of the exports on main. When backporting this to release/v4, it will enable access only to these narrowed exports which aren't currently exported at all.

@dimkl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I would suggest we close this PR because in the context of the Public APIs RFC we are going to change the exports of the @clerk/backend and probably export a @clerk/backend/errors subpath with the errors that we want to expose.
Also, I would suggest we keep those errors exported (from the /errors subpath) since the customer use case seems valid.

export { AuthStatus } from './authStatus';
export type { RequestState } from './authStatus';
export * from './errors';
export { TokenVerificationError, TokenVerificationErrorReason } from './errors';

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@tmilewski As the discussion about the error-related exports for v5 is still ongoing, I think we need to do the following:

  • export the requested error from release/v4
  • remove export * from './errors' from here
  • revisit this then we make a decision

@tmilewski
tmilewski added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 7, 2023
Merged via the queue into main with commit e1f7eaeDec 7, 2023
@tmilewski
tmilewski deleted the chore/limit-token-error-exports branch December 7, 2023 15:10
octoper pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@tmilewski@dimkl@nikosdouvlis@clerk-cookie
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); chore(backend): Limit exposed token verification related errors by tmilewski · Pull Request #2189 · clerk/javascript · GitHub
Skip to content

chore(backend): Limit exposed token verification related errors - #2189

Merged
tmilewski merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/limit-token-error-exports
Dec 7, 2023
Merged

chore(backend): Limit exposed token verification related errors#2189
tmilewski merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/limit-token-error-exports

Conversation

@tmilewski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

Removes both TokenVerificationErrorAction & TokenVerificationErrorCode from @clerk/backend exports as both are internal.

It also happens to support @flawnn's work/use-case in #1980, once we backport to release/v4.

Checklist

  • npm test runs as expected.
  • npm run build runs as expected.
  • (If applicable) JSDoc comments have been added or updated for any package exports
  • (If applicable) Documentation has been updated

Type of change

  • 🐛 Bug fix
  • 🌟 New feature
  • 🔨 Breaking change
  • 📖 Refactoring / dependency upgrade / documentation
  • other:

Packages affected

  • @clerk/backend
  • @clerk/chrome-extension
  • @clerk/clerk-js
  • @clerk/clerk-expo
  • @clerk/fastify
  • gatsby-plugin-clerk
  • @clerk/localizations
  • @clerk/nextjs
  • @clerk/clerk-react
  • @clerk/remix
  • @clerk/clerk-sdk-node
  • @clerk/shared
  • @clerk/themes
  • @clerk/types
  • build/tooling/chore

Co-authored-by: flawnn <fl4wn@protonmail.com>
@tmilewskitmilewski self-assigned this Nov 22, 2023
@changeset-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 5410436

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 6 packages
NameType
@clerk/clerk-sdk-nodeMajor
@clerk/backendMajor
@clerk/nextjsMajor
@clerk/remixMajor
gatsby-plugin-clerkPatch
@clerk/fastifyPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@dimkldimkl left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❓ How is dropping those 2 exports going to resolve the use case of user of catching and handling those errors? I think i got confused. 😓

@tmilewski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@dimkl It doesn't. A comment in the other PR suggested we wanted to keep some of these exports internal. This PR aims to narrow the scope of the exports on main. When backporting this to release/v4, it will enable access only to these narrowed exports which aren't currently exported at all.

@dimkl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I would suggest we close this PR because in the context of the Public APIs RFC we are going to change the exports of the @clerk/backend and probably export a @clerk/backend/errors subpath with the errors that we want to expose.
Also, I would suggest we keep those errors exported (from the /errors subpath) since the customer use case seems valid.

export { AuthStatus } from './authStatus';
export type { RequestState } from './authStatus';
export * from './errors';
export { TokenVerificationError, TokenVerificationErrorReason } from './errors';

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@tmilewski As the discussion about the error-related exports for v5 is still ongoing, I think we need to do the following:

  • export the requested error from release/v4
  • remove export * from './errors' from here
  • revisit this then we make a decision

@tmilewski
tmilewski added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 7, 2023
Merged via the queue into main with commit e1f7eaeDec 7, 2023
@tmilewski
tmilewski deleted the chore/limit-token-error-exports branch December 7, 2023 15:10
octoper pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@tmilewski@dimkl@nikosdouvlis@clerk-cookie