fix(elements): Fix SignIn.SafeIdentifier potentially outputting an incorrect value - #3974

Merged
tmilewski merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
tm/fix-elements-safeIdentifier
Aug 26, 2024
Merged

fix(elements): Fix SignIn.SafeIdentifier potentially outputting an incorrect value#3974
tmilewski merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
tm/fix-elements-safeIdentifier

Conversation

@tmilewski

@tmilewskitmilewski commented Aug 16, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

Fix SignIn.SafeIdentifier potentially outputting an incorrect identifier when using similar multi-session sign in strategies.

Fixes: SDKI-609

Checklist

  • npm test runs as expected.
  • npm run build runs as expected.
  • (If applicable) JSDoc comments have been added or updated for any package exports
  • (If applicable) Documentation has been updated

Type of change

  • 🐛 Bug fix
  • 🌟 New feature
  • 🔨 Breaking change
  • 📖 Refactoring / dependency upgrade / documentation
  • other:

@tmilewskitmilewski self-assigned this Aug 16, 2024
@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Aug 16, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 644a32c

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
NameType
@clerk/elementsPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@tmilewskitmilewski changed the title fix(elements): Fix SignIn.SafeIdentifier potentially outputting an …fix(elements): Fix SignIn.SafeIdentifier potentially outputting an incorrect valueAug 16, 2024
@tmilewski
tmilewski requested a review from nme22August 16, 2024 17:28

const matchingFactor =
signIn.identifier && matchingFactors.length > 0
? matchingFactors.find(f => 'safeIdentifier' in f && f.safeIdentifier === signIn.identifier)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Requiring the factor's safeIdentifier to match the user provided identifier results in the user provided identifier being returned for factors in which it's not valid, for example rendering a phone number for email_code and email_link. Should we maybe break this logic up into two pieces?

constmatchingFactorForIdentifier=signIn.identifier&&matchingFactors.length>0
? matchingFactors.find((f)=>"safeIdentifier"inf&&f.safeIdentifier===signIn.identifier)
: null;constmatchingFactorForStrategy=matchingFactors[0];if(matchingFactorForIdentifier&&"safeIdentifier"inmatchingFactorForIdentifier){returnmatchingFactorForIdentifier.safeIdentifier;}elseif(matchingFactorForStrategy&&"safeIdentifier"inmatchingFactorForStrategy){returnmatchingFactorForStrategy.safeIdentifier;}

Screen Shot 2024-08-16 at 10 37 18 AM

@nme22nme22 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approving. I think @dstaley 's mention of breaking this logic up into two spots is a good call.

@tmilewski
tmilewskiforce-pushed the tm/fix-elements-safeIdentifier branch from fc288b3 to b4f6530CompareAugust 26, 2024 20:02
@tmilewski
tmilewski requested a review from dstaleyAugust 26, 2024 20:03
@tmilewski
tmilewski merged commit a5cf6be into mainAug 26, 2024
@tmilewski
tmilewski deleted the tm/fix-elements-safeIdentifier branch August 26, 2024 20:19
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@tmilewski@dstaley@alexcarpenter@nme22@clerk-cookie
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

fix(elements): Fix SignIn.SafeIdentifier potentially outputting an incorrect value - #3974

Merged
tmilewski merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
tm/fix-elements-safeIdentifier
Aug 26, 2024
Merged

fix(elements): Fix SignIn.SafeIdentifier potentially outputting an incorrect value#3974
tmilewski merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
tm/fix-elements-safeIdentifier

Conversation

@tmilewski

@tmilewskitmilewski commented Aug 16, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

Fix SignIn.SafeIdentifier potentially outputting an incorrect identifier when using similar multi-session sign in strategies.

Fixes: SDKI-609

Checklist

  • npm test runs as expected.
  • npm run build runs as expected.
  • (If applicable) JSDoc comments have been added or updated for any package exports
  • (If applicable) Documentation has been updated

Type of change

  • 🐛 Bug fix
  • 🌟 New feature
  • 🔨 Breaking change
  • 📖 Refactoring / dependency upgrade / documentation
  • other:

@tmilewskitmilewski self-assigned this Aug 16, 2024
@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Aug 16, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 644a32c

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
NameType
@clerk/elementsPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@tmilewskitmilewski changed the title fix(elements): Fix SignIn.SafeIdentifier potentially outputting an …fix(elements): Fix SignIn.SafeIdentifier potentially outputting an incorrect valueAug 16, 2024
@tmilewski
tmilewski requested a review from nme22August 16, 2024 17:28

const matchingFactor =
signIn.identifier && matchingFactors.length > 0
? matchingFactors.find(f => 'safeIdentifier' in f && f.safeIdentifier === signIn.identifier)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Requiring the factor's safeIdentifier to match the user provided identifier results in the user provided identifier being returned for factors in which it's not valid, for example rendering a phone number for email_code and email_link. Should we maybe break this logic up into two pieces?

constmatchingFactorForIdentifier=signIn.identifier&&matchingFactors.length>0
? matchingFactors.find((f)=>"safeIdentifier"inf&&f.safeIdentifier===signIn.identifier)
: null;constmatchingFactorForStrategy=matchingFactors[0];if(matchingFactorForIdentifier&&"safeIdentifier"inmatchingFactorForIdentifier){returnmatchingFactorForIdentifier.safeIdentifier;}elseif(matchingFactorForStrategy&&"safeIdentifier"inmatchingFactorForStrategy){returnmatchingFactorForStrategy.safeIdentifier;}

Screen Shot 2024-08-16 at 10 37 18 AM

@nme22nme22 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approving. I think @dstaley 's mention of breaking this logic up into two spots is a good call.

@tmilewski
tmilewskiforce-pushed the tm/fix-elements-safeIdentifier branch from fc288b3 to b4f6530CompareAugust 26, 2024 20:02
@tmilewski
tmilewski requested a review from dstaleyAugust 26, 2024 20:03
@tmilewski
tmilewski merged commit a5cf6be into mainAug 26, 2024
@tmilewski
tmilewski deleted the tm/fix-elements-safeIdentifier branch August 26, 2024 20:19
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@tmilewski@dstaley@alexcarpenter@nme22@clerk-cookie
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix(elements): Fix SignIn.SafeIdentifier potentially outputting an incorrect value - #3974

Merged
tmilewski merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
tm/fix-elements-safeIdentifier
Aug 26, 2024
Merged

fix(elements): Fix SignIn.SafeIdentifier potentially outputting an incorrect value#3974
tmilewski merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
tm/fix-elements-safeIdentifier

Conversation

@tmilewski

@tmilewskitmilewski commented Aug 16, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

Fix SignIn.SafeIdentifier potentially outputting an incorrect identifier when using similar multi-session sign in strategies.

Fixes: SDKI-609

Checklist

  • npm test runs as expected.
  • npm run build runs as expected.
  • (If applicable) JSDoc comments have been added or updated for any package exports
  • (If applicable) Documentation has been updated

Type of change

  • 🐛 Bug fix
  • 🌟 New feature
  • 🔨 Breaking change
  • 📖 Refactoring / dependency upgrade / documentation
  • other:

@tmilewskitmilewski self-assigned this Aug 16, 2024
@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Aug 16, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 644a32c

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
NameType
@clerk/elementsPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@tmilewskitmilewski changed the title fix(elements): Fix SignIn.SafeIdentifier potentially outputting an …fix(elements): Fix SignIn.SafeIdentifier potentially outputting an incorrect valueAug 16, 2024
@tmilewski
tmilewski requested a review from nme22August 16, 2024 17:28

const matchingFactor =
signIn.identifier && matchingFactors.length > 0
? matchingFactors.find(f => 'safeIdentifier' in f && f.safeIdentifier === signIn.identifier)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Requiring the factor's safeIdentifier to match the user provided identifier results in the user provided identifier being returned for factors in which it's not valid, for example rendering a phone number for email_code and email_link. Should we maybe break this logic up into two pieces?

constmatchingFactorForIdentifier=signIn.identifier&&matchingFactors.length>0
? matchingFactors.find((f)=>"safeIdentifier"inf&&f.safeIdentifier===signIn.identifier)
: null;constmatchingFactorForStrategy=matchingFactors[0];if(matchingFactorForIdentifier&&"safeIdentifier"inmatchingFactorForIdentifier){returnmatchingFactorForIdentifier.safeIdentifier;}elseif(matchingFactorForStrategy&&"safeIdentifier"inmatchingFactorForStrategy){returnmatchingFactorForStrategy.safeIdentifier;}

Screen Shot 2024-08-16 at 10 37 18 AM

@nme22nme22 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approving. I think @dstaley 's mention of breaking this logic up into two spots is a good call.

@tmilewski
tmilewskiforce-pushed the tm/fix-elements-safeIdentifier branch from fc288b3 to b4f6530CompareAugust 26, 2024 20:02
@tmilewski
tmilewski requested a review from dstaleyAugust 26, 2024 20:03
@tmilewski
tmilewski merged commit a5cf6be into mainAug 26, 2024
@tmilewski
tmilewski deleted the tm/fix-elements-safeIdentifier branch August 26, 2024 20:19
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@tmilewski@dstaley@alexcarpenter@nme22@clerk-cookie
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix(elements): Fix SignIn.SafeIdentifier potentially outputting an incorrect value - #3974

Merged
tmilewski merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
tm/fix-elements-safeIdentifier
Aug 26, 2024
Merged

fix(elements): Fix SignIn.SafeIdentifier potentially outputting an incorrect value#3974
tmilewski merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
tm/fix-elements-safeIdentifier

Conversation

@tmilewski

@tmilewskitmilewski commented Aug 16, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

Fix SignIn.SafeIdentifier potentially outputting an incorrect identifier when using similar multi-session sign in strategies.

Fixes: SDKI-609

Checklist

  • npm test runs as expected.
  • npm run build runs as expected.
  • (If applicable) JSDoc comments have been added or updated for any package exports
  • (If applicable) Documentation has been updated

Type of change

  • 🐛 Bug fix
  • 🌟 New feature
  • 🔨 Breaking change
  • 📖 Refactoring / dependency upgrade / documentation
  • other:

@tmilewskitmilewski self-assigned this Aug 16, 2024
@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Aug 16, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 644a32c

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
NameType
@clerk/elementsPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@tmilewskitmilewski changed the title fix(elements): Fix SignIn.SafeIdentifier potentially outputting an …fix(elements): Fix SignIn.SafeIdentifier potentially outputting an incorrect valueAug 16, 2024
@tmilewski
tmilewski requested a review from nme22August 16, 2024 17:28

const matchingFactor =
signIn.identifier && matchingFactors.length > 0
? matchingFactors.find(f => 'safeIdentifier' in f && f.safeIdentifier === signIn.identifier)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Requiring the factor's safeIdentifier to match the user provided identifier results in the user provided identifier being returned for factors in which it's not valid, for example rendering a phone number for email_code and email_link. Should we maybe break this logic up into two pieces?

constmatchingFactorForIdentifier=signIn.identifier&&matchingFactors.length>0
? matchingFactors.find((f)=>"safeIdentifier"inf&&f.safeIdentifier===signIn.identifier)
: null;constmatchingFactorForStrategy=matchingFactors[0];if(matchingFactorForIdentifier&&"safeIdentifier"inmatchingFactorForIdentifier){returnmatchingFactorForIdentifier.safeIdentifier;}elseif(matchingFactorForStrategy&&"safeIdentifier"inmatchingFactorForStrategy){returnmatchingFactorForStrategy.safeIdentifier;}

Screen Shot 2024-08-16 at 10 37 18 AM

@nme22nme22 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approving. I think @dstaley 's mention of breaking this logic up into two spots is a good call.

@tmilewski
tmilewskiforce-pushed the tm/fix-elements-safeIdentifier branch from fc288b3 to b4f6530CompareAugust 26, 2024 20:02
@tmilewski
tmilewski requested a review from dstaleyAugust 26, 2024 20:03
@tmilewski
tmilewski merged commit a5cf6be into mainAug 26, 2024
@tmilewski
tmilewski deleted the tm/fix-elements-safeIdentifier branch August 26, 2024 20:19
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@tmilewski@dstaley@alexcarpenter@nme22@clerk-cookie
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

fix(elements): Fix SignIn.SafeIdentifier potentially outputting an incorrect value - #3974

Merged
tmilewski merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
tm/fix-elements-safeIdentifier
Aug 26, 2024
Merged

fix(elements): Fix SignIn.SafeIdentifier potentially outputting an incorrect value#3974
tmilewski merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
tm/fix-elements-safeIdentifier

Conversation

@tmilewski

@tmilewskitmilewski commented Aug 16, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

Fix SignIn.SafeIdentifier potentially outputting an incorrect identifier when using similar multi-session sign in strategies.

Fixes: SDKI-609

Checklist

  • npm test runs as expected.
  • npm run build runs as expected.
  • (If applicable) JSDoc comments have been added or updated for any package exports
  • (If applicable) Documentation has been updated

Type of change

  • 🐛 Bug fix
  • 🌟 New feature
  • 🔨 Breaking change
  • 📖 Refactoring / dependency upgrade / documentation
  • other:

@tmilewskitmilewski self-assigned this Aug 16, 2024
@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Aug 16, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 644a32c

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
NameType
@clerk/elementsPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@tmilewskitmilewski changed the title fix(elements): Fix SignIn.SafeIdentifier potentially outputting an …fix(elements): Fix SignIn.SafeIdentifier potentially outputting an incorrect valueAug 16, 2024
@tmilewski
tmilewski requested a review from nme22August 16, 2024 17:28

const matchingFactor =
signIn.identifier && matchingFactors.length > 0
? matchingFactors.find(f => 'safeIdentifier' in f && f.safeIdentifier === signIn.identifier)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Requiring the factor's safeIdentifier to match the user provided identifier results in the user provided identifier being returned for factors in which it's not valid, for example rendering a phone number for email_code and email_link. Should we maybe break this logic up into two pieces?

constmatchingFactorForIdentifier=signIn.identifier&&matchingFactors.length>0
? matchingFactors.find((f)=>"safeIdentifier"inf&&f.safeIdentifier===signIn.identifier)
: null;constmatchingFactorForStrategy=matchingFactors[0];if(matchingFactorForIdentifier&&"safeIdentifier"inmatchingFactorForIdentifier){returnmatchingFactorForIdentifier.safeIdentifier;}elseif(matchingFactorForStrategy&&"safeIdentifier"inmatchingFactorForStrategy){returnmatchingFactorForStrategy.safeIdentifier;}

Screen Shot 2024-08-16 at 10 37 18 AM

@nme22nme22 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approving. I think @dstaley 's mention of breaking this logic up into two spots is a good call.

@tmilewski
tmilewskiforce-pushed the tm/fix-elements-safeIdentifier branch from fc288b3 to b4f6530CompareAugust 26, 2024 20:02
@tmilewski
tmilewski requested a review from dstaleyAugust 26, 2024 20:03
@tmilewski
tmilewski merged commit a5cf6be into mainAug 26, 2024
@tmilewski
tmilewski deleted the tm/fix-elements-safeIdentifier branch August 26, 2024 20:19
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@tmilewski@dstaley@alexcarpenter@nme22@clerk-cookie
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix(elements): Fix SignIn.SafeIdentifier potentially outputting an incorrect value - #3974

Merged
tmilewski merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
tm/fix-elements-safeIdentifier
Aug 26, 2024
Merged

fix(elements): Fix SignIn.SafeIdentifier potentially outputting an incorrect value#3974
tmilewski merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
tm/fix-elements-safeIdentifier

Conversation

@tmilewski

@tmilewskitmilewski commented Aug 16, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

Fix SignIn.SafeIdentifier potentially outputting an incorrect identifier when using similar multi-session sign in strategies.

Fixes: SDKI-609

Checklist

  • npm test runs as expected.
  • npm run build runs as expected.
  • (If applicable) JSDoc comments have been added or updated for any package exports
  • (If applicable) Documentation has been updated

Type of change

  • 🐛 Bug fix
  • 🌟 New feature
  • 🔨 Breaking change
  • 📖 Refactoring / dependency upgrade / documentation
  • other:

@tmilewskitmilewski self-assigned this Aug 16, 2024
@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Aug 16, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 644a32c

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
NameType
@clerk/elementsPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@tmilewskitmilewski changed the title fix(elements): Fix SignIn.SafeIdentifier potentially outputting an …fix(elements): Fix SignIn.SafeIdentifier potentially outputting an incorrect valueAug 16, 2024
@tmilewski
tmilewski requested a review from nme22August 16, 2024 17:28

const matchingFactor =
signIn.identifier && matchingFactors.length > 0
? matchingFactors.find(f => 'safeIdentifier' in f && f.safeIdentifier === signIn.identifier)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Requiring the factor's safeIdentifier to match the user provided identifier results in the user provided identifier being returned for factors in which it's not valid, for example rendering a phone number for email_code and email_link. Should we maybe break this logic up into two pieces?

constmatchingFactorForIdentifier=signIn.identifier&&matchingFactors.length>0
? matchingFactors.find((f)=>"safeIdentifier"inf&&f.safeIdentifier===signIn.identifier)
: null;constmatchingFactorForStrategy=matchingFactors[0];if(matchingFactorForIdentifier&&"safeIdentifier"inmatchingFactorForIdentifier){returnmatchingFactorForIdentifier.safeIdentifier;}elseif(matchingFactorForStrategy&&"safeIdentifier"inmatchingFactorForStrategy){returnmatchingFactorForStrategy.safeIdentifier;}

Screen Shot 2024-08-16 at 10 37 18 AM

@nme22nme22 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approving. I think @dstaley 's mention of breaking this logic up into two spots is a good call.

@tmilewski
tmilewskiforce-pushed the tm/fix-elements-safeIdentifier branch from fc288b3 to b4f6530CompareAugust 26, 2024 20:02
@tmilewski
tmilewski requested a review from dstaleyAugust 26, 2024 20:03
@tmilewski
tmilewski merged commit a5cf6be into mainAug 26, 2024
@tmilewski
tmilewski deleted the tm/fix-elements-safeIdentifier branch August 26, 2024 20:19
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@tmilewski@dstaley@alexcarpenter@nme22@clerk-cookie
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fix(elements): Fix SignIn.SafeIdentifier potentially outputting an incorrect value - #3974

Merged
tmilewski merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
tm/fix-elements-safeIdentifier
Aug 26, 2024
Merged

fix(elements): Fix SignIn.SafeIdentifier potentially outputting an incorrect value#3974
tmilewski merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
tm/fix-elements-safeIdentifier

Conversation

@tmilewski

@tmilewskitmilewski commented Aug 16, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

Fix SignIn.SafeIdentifier potentially outputting an incorrect identifier when using similar multi-session sign in strategies.

Fixes: SDKI-609

Checklist

  • npm test runs as expected.
  • npm run build runs as expected.
  • (If applicable) JSDoc comments have been added or updated for any package exports
  • (If applicable) Documentation has been updated

Type of change

  • 🐛 Bug fix
  • 🌟 New feature
  • 🔨 Breaking change
  • 📖 Refactoring / dependency upgrade / documentation
  • other:

@tmilewskitmilewski self-assigned this Aug 16, 2024
@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Aug 16, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 644a32c

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
NameType
@clerk/elementsPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@tmilewskitmilewski changed the title fix(elements): Fix SignIn.SafeIdentifier potentially outputting an …fix(elements): Fix SignIn.SafeIdentifier potentially outputting an incorrect valueAug 16, 2024
@tmilewski
tmilewski requested a review from nme22August 16, 2024 17:28

const matchingFactor =
signIn.identifier && matchingFactors.length > 0
? matchingFactors.find(f => 'safeIdentifier' in f && f.safeIdentifier === signIn.identifier)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Requiring the factor's safeIdentifier to match the user provided identifier results in the user provided identifier being returned for factors in which it's not valid, for example rendering a phone number for email_code and email_link. Should we maybe break this logic up into two pieces?

constmatchingFactorForIdentifier=signIn.identifier&&matchingFactors.length>0
? matchingFactors.find((f)=>"safeIdentifier"inf&&f.safeIdentifier===signIn.identifier)
: null;constmatchingFactorForStrategy=matchingFactors[0];if(matchingFactorForIdentifier&&"safeIdentifier"inmatchingFactorForIdentifier){returnmatchingFactorForIdentifier.safeIdentifier;}elseif(matchingFactorForStrategy&&"safeIdentifier"inmatchingFactorForStrategy){returnmatchingFactorForStrategy.safeIdentifier;}

Screen Shot 2024-08-16 at 10 37 18 AM

@nme22nme22 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approving. I think @dstaley 's mention of breaking this logic up into two spots is a good call.

@tmilewski
tmilewskiforce-pushed the tm/fix-elements-safeIdentifier branch from fc288b3 to b4f6530CompareAugust 26, 2024 20:02
@tmilewski
tmilewski requested a review from dstaleyAugust 26, 2024 20:03
@tmilewski
tmilewski merged commit a5cf6be into mainAug 26, 2024
@tmilewski
tmilewski deleted the tm/fix-elements-safeIdentifier branch August 26, 2024 20:19
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@tmilewski@dstaley@alexcarpenter@nme22@clerk-cookie
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

fix(elements): Fix SignIn.SafeIdentifier potentially outputting an incorrect value - #3974

Merged
tmilewski merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
tm/fix-elements-safeIdentifier
Aug 26, 2024
Merged

fix(elements): Fix SignIn.SafeIdentifier potentially outputting an incorrect value#3974
tmilewski merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
tm/fix-elements-safeIdentifier

Conversation

@tmilewski

@tmilewskitmilewski commented Aug 16, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

Fix SignIn.SafeIdentifier potentially outputting an incorrect identifier when using similar multi-session sign in strategies.

Fixes: SDKI-609

Checklist

  • npm test runs as expected.
  • npm run build runs as expected.
  • (If applicable) JSDoc comments have been added or updated for any package exports
  • (If applicable) Documentation has been updated

Type of change

  • 🐛 Bug fix
  • 🌟 New feature
  • 🔨 Breaking change
  • 📖 Refactoring / dependency upgrade / documentation
  • other:

@tmilewskitmilewski self-assigned this Aug 16, 2024
@changeset-bot

changeset-botBot commented Aug 16, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 644a32c

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
NameType
@clerk/elementsPatch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@tmilewskitmilewski changed the title fix(elements): Fix SignIn.SafeIdentifier potentially outputting an …fix(elements): Fix SignIn.SafeIdentifier potentially outputting an incorrect valueAug 16, 2024
@tmilewski
tmilewski requested a review from nme22August 16, 2024 17:28

const matchingFactor =
signIn.identifier && matchingFactors.length > 0
? matchingFactors.find(f => 'safeIdentifier' in f && f.safeIdentifier === signIn.identifier)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Requiring the factor's safeIdentifier to match the user provided identifier results in the user provided identifier being returned for factors in which it's not valid, for example rendering a phone number for email_code and email_link. Should we maybe break this logic up into two pieces?

constmatchingFactorForIdentifier=signIn.identifier&&matchingFactors.length>0
? matchingFactors.find((f)=>"safeIdentifier"inf&&f.safeIdentifier===signIn.identifier)
: null;constmatchingFactorForStrategy=matchingFactors[0];if(matchingFactorForIdentifier&&"safeIdentifier"inmatchingFactorForIdentifier){returnmatchingFactorForIdentifier.safeIdentifier;}elseif(matchingFactorForStrategy&&"safeIdentifier"inmatchingFactorForStrategy){returnmatchingFactorForStrategy.safeIdentifier;}

Screen Shot 2024-08-16 at 10 37 18 AM

@nme22nme22 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approving. I think @dstaley 's mention of breaking this logic up into two spots is a good call.

@tmilewski
tmilewskiforce-pushed the tm/fix-elements-safeIdentifier branch from fc288b3 to b4f6530CompareAugust 26, 2024 20:02
@tmilewski
tmilewski requested a review from dstaleyAugust 26, 2024 20:03
@tmilewski
tmilewski merged commit a5cf6be into mainAug 26, 2024
@tmilewski
tmilewski deleted the tm/fix-elements-safeIdentifier branch August 26, 2024 20:19
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@tmilewski@dstaley@alexcarpenter@nme22@clerk-cookie