Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions .changeset/two-apricots-serve.md
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
---
"@clerk/elements": patch
---

Fix `SignIn.SafeIdentifier` potentially outputting an incorrect identifier when using similar multi-session sign in strategies.
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
import type { SignInFirstFactor } from '@clerk/types';

import { SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy } from '../router.selectors';
import type { SignInRouterSnapshot } from '../router.types';

const IDENTIFIER = 'support@clerk.dev';

function createSnapshot(
supportedFirstFactors: Partial<SignInFirstFactor>[] = [],
identifier?: string,
): SignInRouterSnapshot {
return {
context: {
clerk: {
client: {
signIn: {
status: 'needs_first_factor',
supportedFirstFactors: supportedFirstFactors.map(f => ({
strategy: 'email_code',
emailAddressId: 'idn_foo',
...f,
})),
supportedSecondFactors: null,
identifier: identifier,
},
},
},
},
} as unknown as SignInRouterSnapshot;
}

describe('SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy', () => {
describe('Match: Identifier', () => {
it('should output support@clerk.dev (matchingFactorForIdentifier.safeIdentifier)', () => {
const snapshot = createSnapshot(
[
{
safeIdentifier: 's******@c****.com',
},
{
safeIdentifier: IDENTIFIER,
primary: true,
},
],
IDENTIFIER,
);

const result = SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy('email_code')(snapshot);
expect(result).toEqual(IDENTIFIER);
});
});

describe('Match: Strategy', () => {
it('should output support@clerk.dev (matchingFactorForStrategy.safeIdentifier)', () => {
const snapshot = createSnapshot(
[
{
safeIdentifier: 's******@c****.com',
},
{
safeIdentifier: IDENTIFIER,
primary: true,
},
],
IDENTIFIER,
);

const result = SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy('email_code')(snapshot);
expect(result).toEqual(IDENTIFIER);
});

it('should output s*****1@c****.com (matchingFactorForStrategy.safeIdentifier)', () => {
const snapshot = createSnapshot(
[
{
safeIdentifier: 's*****1@c****.com',
},
{
safeIdentifier: 's*****2@c****.com',
primary: true,
},
],
IDENTIFIER,
);

const result = SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy('email_code')(snapshot);
expect(result).toEqual('s*****1@c****.com');
});
});

describe('Match: Default', () => {
it('should output support@clerk.dev (signIn.identifier)', () => {
const snapshot = createSnapshot([], IDENTIFIER);
const result = SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy('email_code')(snapshot);
expect(result).toEqual(IDENTIFIER);
});

it('should output an empty string', () => {
const snapshot = createSnapshot([], undefined);
const result = SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy('email_code')(snapshot);
expect(result).toEqual('');
});
});
});
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -8,18 +8,30 @@ export function SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy(
): (s: SignInRouterSnapshot) => string {
return (s: SignInRouterSnapshot) => {
const signIn = s.context.clerk?.client.signIn;
const identifier = signIn.identifier || '';

if (strategy) {
const matchingFactor = [...(signIn.supportedFirstFactors ?? []), ...(signIn.supportedSecondFactors ?? [])].find(
f => f.strategy === strategy,
);
if (matchingFactor && 'safeIdentifier' in matchingFactor) {
return matchingFactor.safeIdentifier;
const matchingFactors = [
...(signIn.supportedFirstFactors ?? []),
...(signIn.supportedSecondFactors ?? []),
].filter(f => f.strategy === strategy);

const matchingFactorForIdentifier =
signIn.identifier && matchingFactors.length > 0
? matchingFactors.find(f => 'safeIdentifier' in f && f.safeIdentifier === signIn.identifier)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Requiring the factor's safeIdentifier to match the user provided identifier results in the user provided identifier being returned for factors in which it's not valid, for example rendering a phone number for email_code and email_link. Should we maybe break this logic up into two pieces?

constmatchingFactorForIdentifier=signIn.identifier&&matchingFactors.length>0
? matchingFactors.find((f)=>"safeIdentifier"inf&&f.safeIdentifier===signIn.identifier)
: null;constmatchingFactorForStrategy=matchingFactors[0];if(matchingFactorForIdentifier&&"safeIdentifier"inmatchingFactorForIdentifier){returnmatchingFactorForIdentifier.safeIdentifier;}elseif(matchingFactorForStrategy&&"safeIdentifier"inmatchingFactorForStrategy){returnmatchingFactorForStrategy.safeIdentifier;}

Screen Shot 2024-08-16 at 10 37 18 AM

: null;

const matchingFactorForStrategy = matchingFactors[0];

if (matchingFactorForIdentifier && 'safeIdentifier' in matchingFactorForIdentifier) {
return matchingFactorForIdentifier.safeIdentifier;
}

if (matchingFactorForStrategy && 'safeIdentifier' in matchingFactorForStrategy) {
return matchingFactorForStrategy.safeIdentifier;
}
}

return identifier;
return signIn.identifier || '';
};
}

Expand Down
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions .changeset/two-apricots-serve.md
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
---
"@clerk/elements": patch
---

Fix `SignIn.SafeIdentifier` potentially outputting an incorrect identifier when using similar multi-session sign in strategies.
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
import type { SignInFirstFactor } from '@clerk/types';

import { SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy } from '../router.selectors';
import type { SignInRouterSnapshot } from '../router.types';

const IDENTIFIER = 'support@clerk.dev';

function createSnapshot(
supportedFirstFactors: Partial<SignInFirstFactor>[] = [],
identifier?: string,
): SignInRouterSnapshot {
return {
context: {
clerk: {
client: {
signIn: {
status: 'needs_first_factor',
supportedFirstFactors: supportedFirstFactors.map(f => ({
strategy: 'email_code',
emailAddressId: 'idn_foo',
...f,
})),
supportedSecondFactors: null,
identifier: identifier,
},
},
},
},
} as unknown as SignInRouterSnapshot;
}

describe('SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy', () => {
describe('Match: Identifier', () => {
it('should output support@clerk.dev (matchingFactorForIdentifier.safeIdentifier)', () => {
const snapshot = createSnapshot(
[
{
safeIdentifier: 's******@c****.com',
},
{
safeIdentifier: IDENTIFIER,
primary: true,
},
],
IDENTIFIER,
);

const result = SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy('email_code')(snapshot);
expect(result).toEqual(IDENTIFIER);
});
});

describe('Match: Strategy', () => {
it('should output support@clerk.dev (matchingFactorForStrategy.safeIdentifier)', () => {
const snapshot = createSnapshot(
[
{
safeIdentifier: 's******@c****.com',
},
{
safeIdentifier: IDENTIFIER,
primary: true,
},
],
IDENTIFIER,
);

const result = SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy('email_code')(snapshot);
expect(result).toEqual(IDENTIFIER);
});

it('should output s*****1@c****.com (matchingFactorForStrategy.safeIdentifier)', () => {
const snapshot = createSnapshot(
[
{
safeIdentifier: 's*****1@c****.com',
},
{
safeIdentifier: 's*****2@c****.com',
primary: true,
},
],
IDENTIFIER,
);

const result = SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy('email_code')(snapshot);
expect(result).toEqual('s*****1@c****.com');
});
});

describe('Match: Default', () => {
it('should output support@clerk.dev (signIn.identifier)', () => {
const snapshot = createSnapshot([], IDENTIFIER);
const result = SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy('email_code')(snapshot);
expect(result).toEqual(IDENTIFIER);
});

it('should output an empty string', () => {
const snapshot = createSnapshot([], undefined);
const result = SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy('email_code')(snapshot);
expect(result).toEqual('');
});
});
});
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -8,18 +8,30 @@ export function SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy(
): (s: SignInRouterSnapshot) => string {
return (s: SignInRouterSnapshot) => {
const signIn = s.context.clerk?.client.signIn;
const identifier = signIn.identifier || '';

if (strategy) {
const matchingFactor = [...(signIn.supportedFirstFactors ?? []), ...(signIn.supportedSecondFactors ?? [])].find(
f => f.strategy === strategy,
);
if (matchingFactor && 'safeIdentifier' in matchingFactor) {
return matchingFactor.safeIdentifier;
const matchingFactors = [
...(signIn.supportedFirstFactors ?? []),
...(signIn.supportedSecondFactors ?? []),
].filter(f => f.strategy === strategy);

const matchingFactorForIdentifier =
signIn.identifier && matchingFactors.length > 0
? matchingFactors.find(f => 'safeIdentifier' in f && f.safeIdentifier === signIn.identifier)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Requiring the factor's safeIdentifier to match the user provided identifier results in the user provided identifier being returned for factors in which it's not valid, for example rendering a phone number for email_code and email_link. Should we maybe break this logic up into two pieces?

constmatchingFactorForIdentifier=signIn.identifier&&matchingFactors.length>0
? matchingFactors.find((f)=>"safeIdentifier"inf&&f.safeIdentifier===signIn.identifier)
: null;constmatchingFactorForStrategy=matchingFactors[0];if(matchingFactorForIdentifier&&"safeIdentifier"inmatchingFactorForIdentifier){returnmatchingFactorForIdentifier.safeIdentifier;}elseif(matchingFactorForStrategy&&"safeIdentifier"inmatchingFactorForStrategy){returnmatchingFactorForStrategy.safeIdentifier;}

Screen Shot 2024-08-16 at 10 37 18 AM

: null;

const matchingFactorForStrategy = matchingFactors[0];

if (matchingFactorForIdentifier && 'safeIdentifier' in matchingFactorForIdentifier) {
return matchingFactorForIdentifier.safeIdentifier;
}

if (matchingFactorForStrategy && 'safeIdentifier' in matchingFactorForStrategy) {
return matchingFactorForStrategy.safeIdentifier;
}
}

return identifier;
return signIn.identifier || '';
};
}

Expand Down
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions .changeset/two-apricots-serve.md
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
---
"@clerk/elements": patch
---

Fix `SignIn.SafeIdentifier` potentially outputting an incorrect identifier when using similar multi-session sign in strategies.
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
import type { SignInFirstFactor } from '@clerk/types';

import { SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy } from '../router.selectors';
import type { SignInRouterSnapshot } from '../router.types';

const IDENTIFIER = 'support@clerk.dev';

function createSnapshot(
supportedFirstFactors: Partial<SignInFirstFactor>[] = [],
identifier?: string,
): SignInRouterSnapshot {
return {
context: {
clerk: {
client: {
signIn: {
status: 'needs_first_factor',
supportedFirstFactors: supportedFirstFactors.map(f => ({
strategy: 'email_code',
emailAddressId: 'idn_foo',
...f,
})),
supportedSecondFactors: null,
identifier: identifier,
},
},
},
},
} as unknown as SignInRouterSnapshot;
}

describe('SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy', () => {
describe('Match: Identifier', () => {
it('should output support@clerk.dev (matchingFactorForIdentifier.safeIdentifier)', () => {
const snapshot = createSnapshot(
[
{
safeIdentifier: 's******@c****.com',
},
{
safeIdentifier: IDENTIFIER,
primary: true,
},
],
IDENTIFIER,
);

const result = SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy('email_code')(snapshot);
expect(result).toEqual(IDENTIFIER);
});
});

describe('Match: Strategy', () => {
it('should output support@clerk.dev (matchingFactorForStrategy.safeIdentifier)', () => {
const snapshot = createSnapshot(
[
{
safeIdentifier: 's******@c****.com',
},
{
safeIdentifier: IDENTIFIER,
primary: true,
},
],
IDENTIFIER,
);

const result = SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy('email_code')(snapshot);
expect(result).toEqual(IDENTIFIER);
});

it('should output s*****1@c****.com (matchingFactorForStrategy.safeIdentifier)', () => {
const snapshot = createSnapshot(
[
{
safeIdentifier: 's*****1@c****.com',
},
{
safeIdentifier: 's*****2@c****.com',
primary: true,
},
],
IDENTIFIER,
);

const result = SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy('email_code')(snapshot);
expect(result).toEqual('s*****1@c****.com');
});
});

describe('Match: Default', () => {
it('should output support@clerk.dev (signIn.identifier)', () => {
const snapshot = createSnapshot([], IDENTIFIER);
const result = SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy('email_code')(snapshot);
expect(result).toEqual(IDENTIFIER);
});

it('should output an empty string', () => {
const snapshot = createSnapshot([], undefined);
const result = SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy('email_code')(snapshot);
expect(result).toEqual('');
});
});
});
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -8,18 +8,30 @@ export function SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy(
): (s: SignInRouterSnapshot) => string {
return (s: SignInRouterSnapshot) => {
const signIn = s.context.clerk?.client.signIn;
const identifier = signIn.identifier || '';

if (strategy) {
const matchingFactor = [...(signIn.supportedFirstFactors ?? []), ...(signIn.supportedSecondFactors ?? [])].find(
f => f.strategy === strategy,
);
if (matchingFactor && 'safeIdentifier' in matchingFactor) {
return matchingFactor.safeIdentifier;
const matchingFactors = [
...(signIn.supportedFirstFactors ?? []),
...(signIn.supportedSecondFactors ?? []),
].filter(f => f.strategy === strategy);

const matchingFactorForIdentifier =
signIn.identifier && matchingFactors.length > 0
? matchingFactors.find(f => 'safeIdentifier' in f && f.safeIdentifier === signIn.identifier)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Requiring the factor's safeIdentifier to match the user provided identifier results in the user provided identifier being returned for factors in which it's not valid, for example rendering a phone number for email_code and email_link. Should we maybe break this logic up into two pieces?

constmatchingFactorForIdentifier=signIn.identifier&&matchingFactors.length>0
? matchingFactors.find((f)=>"safeIdentifier"inf&&f.safeIdentifier===signIn.identifier)
: null;constmatchingFactorForStrategy=matchingFactors[0];if(matchingFactorForIdentifier&&"safeIdentifier"inmatchingFactorForIdentifier){returnmatchingFactorForIdentifier.safeIdentifier;}elseif(matchingFactorForStrategy&&"safeIdentifier"inmatchingFactorForStrategy){returnmatchingFactorForStrategy.safeIdentifier;}

Screen Shot 2024-08-16 at 10 37 18 AM

: null;

const matchingFactorForStrategy = matchingFactors[0];

if (matchingFactorForIdentifier && 'safeIdentifier' in matchingFactorForIdentifier) {
return matchingFactorForIdentifier.safeIdentifier;
}

if (matchingFactorForStrategy && 'safeIdentifier' in matchingFactorForStrategy) {
return matchingFactorForStrategy.safeIdentifier;
}
}

return identifier;
return signIn.identifier || '';
};
}

Expand Down
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions .changeset/two-apricots-serve.md
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
---
"@clerk/elements": patch
---

Fix `SignIn.SafeIdentifier` potentially outputting an incorrect identifier when using similar multi-session sign in strategies.
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
import type { SignInFirstFactor } from '@clerk/types';

import { SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy } from '../router.selectors';
import type { SignInRouterSnapshot } from '../router.types';

const IDENTIFIER = 'support@clerk.dev';

function createSnapshot(
supportedFirstFactors: Partial<SignInFirstFactor>[] = [],
identifier?: string,
): SignInRouterSnapshot {
return {
context: {
clerk: {
client: {
signIn: {
status: 'needs_first_factor',
supportedFirstFactors: supportedFirstFactors.map(f => ({
strategy: 'email_code',
emailAddressId: 'idn_foo',
...f,
})),
supportedSecondFactors: null,
identifier: identifier,
},
},
},
},
} as unknown as SignInRouterSnapshot;
}

describe('SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy', () => {
describe('Match: Identifier', () => {
it('should output support@clerk.dev (matchingFactorForIdentifier.safeIdentifier)', () => {
const snapshot = createSnapshot(
[
{
safeIdentifier: 's******@c****.com',
},
{
safeIdentifier: IDENTIFIER,
primary: true,
},
],
IDENTIFIER,
);

const result = SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy('email_code')(snapshot);
expect(result).toEqual(IDENTIFIER);
});
});

describe('Match: Strategy', () => {
it('should output support@clerk.dev (matchingFactorForStrategy.safeIdentifier)', () => {
const snapshot = createSnapshot(
[
{
safeIdentifier: 's******@c****.com',
},
{
safeIdentifier: IDENTIFIER,
primary: true,
},
],
IDENTIFIER,
);

const result = SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy('email_code')(snapshot);
expect(result).toEqual(IDENTIFIER);
});

it('should output s*****1@c****.com (matchingFactorForStrategy.safeIdentifier)', () => {
const snapshot = createSnapshot(
[
{
safeIdentifier: 's*****1@c****.com',
},
{
safeIdentifier: 's*****2@c****.com',
primary: true,
},
],
IDENTIFIER,
);

const result = SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy('email_code')(snapshot);
expect(result).toEqual('s*****1@c****.com');
});
});

describe('Match: Default', () => {
it('should output support@clerk.dev (signIn.identifier)', () => {
const snapshot = createSnapshot([], IDENTIFIER);
const result = SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy('email_code')(snapshot);
expect(result).toEqual(IDENTIFIER);
});

it('should output an empty string', () => {
const snapshot = createSnapshot([], undefined);
const result = SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy('email_code')(snapshot);
expect(result).toEqual('');
});
});
});
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -8,18 +8,30 @@ export function SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy(
): (s: SignInRouterSnapshot) => string {
return (s: SignInRouterSnapshot) => {
const signIn = s.context.clerk?.client.signIn;
const identifier = signIn.identifier || '';

if (strategy) {
const matchingFactor = [...(signIn.supportedFirstFactors ?? []), ...(signIn.supportedSecondFactors ?? [])].find(
f => f.strategy === strategy,
);
if (matchingFactor && 'safeIdentifier' in matchingFactor) {
return matchingFactor.safeIdentifier;
const matchingFactors = [
...(signIn.supportedFirstFactors ?? []),
...(signIn.supportedSecondFactors ?? []),
].filter(f => f.strategy === strategy);

const matchingFactorForIdentifier =
signIn.identifier && matchingFactors.length > 0
? matchingFactors.find(f => 'safeIdentifier' in f && f.safeIdentifier === signIn.identifier)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Requiring the factor's safeIdentifier to match the user provided identifier results in the user provided identifier being returned for factors in which it's not valid, for example rendering a phone number for email_code and email_link. Should we maybe break this logic up into two pieces?

constmatchingFactorForIdentifier=signIn.identifier&&matchingFactors.length>0
? matchingFactors.find((f)=>"safeIdentifier"inf&&f.safeIdentifier===signIn.identifier)
: null;constmatchingFactorForStrategy=matchingFactors[0];if(matchingFactorForIdentifier&&"safeIdentifier"inmatchingFactorForIdentifier){returnmatchingFactorForIdentifier.safeIdentifier;}elseif(matchingFactorForStrategy&&"safeIdentifier"inmatchingFactorForStrategy){returnmatchingFactorForStrategy.safeIdentifier;}

Screen Shot 2024-08-16 at 10 37 18 AM

: null;

const matchingFactorForStrategy = matchingFactors[0];

if (matchingFactorForIdentifier && 'safeIdentifier' in matchingFactorForIdentifier) {
return matchingFactorForIdentifier.safeIdentifier;
}

if (matchingFactorForStrategy && 'safeIdentifier' in matchingFactorForStrategy) {
return matchingFactorForStrategy.safeIdentifier;
}
}

return identifier;
return signIn.identifier || '';
};
}

Expand Down
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions .changeset/two-apricots-serve.md
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
---
"@clerk/elements": patch
---

Fix `SignIn.SafeIdentifier` potentially outputting an incorrect identifier when using similar multi-session sign in strategies.
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
import type { SignInFirstFactor } from '@clerk/types';

import { SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy } from '../router.selectors';
import type { SignInRouterSnapshot } from '../router.types';

const IDENTIFIER = 'support@clerk.dev';

function createSnapshot(
supportedFirstFactors: Partial<SignInFirstFactor>[] = [],
identifier?: string,
): SignInRouterSnapshot {
return {
context: {
clerk: {
client: {
signIn: {
status: 'needs_first_factor',
supportedFirstFactors: supportedFirstFactors.map(f => ({
strategy: 'email_code',
emailAddressId: 'idn_foo',
...f,
})),
supportedSecondFactors: null,
identifier: identifier,
},
},
},
},
} as unknown as SignInRouterSnapshot;
}

describe('SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy', () => {
describe('Match: Identifier', () => {
it('should output support@clerk.dev (matchingFactorForIdentifier.safeIdentifier)', () => {
const snapshot = createSnapshot(
[
{
safeIdentifier: 's******@c****.com',
},
{
safeIdentifier: IDENTIFIER,
primary: true,
},
],
IDENTIFIER,
);

const result = SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy('email_code')(snapshot);
expect(result).toEqual(IDENTIFIER);
});
});

describe('Match: Strategy', () => {
it('should output support@clerk.dev (matchingFactorForStrategy.safeIdentifier)', () => {
const snapshot = createSnapshot(
[
{
safeIdentifier: 's******@c****.com',
},
{
safeIdentifier: IDENTIFIER,
primary: true,
},
],
IDENTIFIER,
);

const result = SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy('email_code')(snapshot);
expect(result).toEqual(IDENTIFIER);
});

it('should output s*****1@c****.com (matchingFactorForStrategy.safeIdentifier)', () => {
const snapshot = createSnapshot(
[
{
safeIdentifier: 's*****1@c****.com',
},
{
safeIdentifier: 's*****2@c****.com',
primary: true,
},
],
IDENTIFIER,
);

const result = SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy('email_code')(snapshot);
expect(result).toEqual('s*****1@c****.com');
});
});

describe('Match: Default', () => {
it('should output support@clerk.dev (signIn.identifier)', () => {
const snapshot = createSnapshot([], IDENTIFIER);
const result = SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy('email_code')(snapshot);
expect(result).toEqual(IDENTIFIER);
});

it('should output an empty string', () => {
const snapshot = createSnapshot([], undefined);
const result = SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy('email_code')(snapshot);
expect(result).toEqual('');
});
});
});
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -8,18 +8,30 @@ export function SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy(
): (s: SignInRouterSnapshot) => string {
return (s: SignInRouterSnapshot) => {
const signIn = s.context.clerk?.client.signIn;
const identifier = signIn.identifier || '';

if (strategy) {
const matchingFactor = [...(signIn.supportedFirstFactors ?? []), ...(signIn.supportedSecondFactors ?? [])].find(
f => f.strategy === strategy,
);
if (matchingFactor && 'safeIdentifier' in matchingFactor) {
return matchingFactor.safeIdentifier;
const matchingFactors = [
...(signIn.supportedFirstFactors ?? []),
...(signIn.supportedSecondFactors ?? []),
].filter(f => f.strategy === strategy);

const matchingFactorForIdentifier =
signIn.identifier && matchingFactors.length > 0
? matchingFactors.find(f => 'safeIdentifier' in f && f.safeIdentifier === signIn.identifier)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Requiring the factor's safeIdentifier to match the user provided identifier results in the user provided identifier being returned for factors in which it's not valid, for example rendering a phone number for email_code and email_link. Should we maybe break this logic up into two pieces?

constmatchingFactorForIdentifier=signIn.identifier&&matchingFactors.length>0
? matchingFactors.find((f)=>"safeIdentifier"inf&&f.safeIdentifier===signIn.identifier)
: null;constmatchingFactorForStrategy=matchingFactors[0];if(matchingFactorForIdentifier&&"safeIdentifier"inmatchingFactorForIdentifier){returnmatchingFactorForIdentifier.safeIdentifier;}elseif(matchingFactorForStrategy&&"safeIdentifier"inmatchingFactorForStrategy){returnmatchingFactorForStrategy.safeIdentifier;}

Screen Shot 2024-08-16 at 10 37 18 AM

: null;

const matchingFactorForStrategy = matchingFactors[0];

if (matchingFactorForIdentifier && 'safeIdentifier' in matchingFactorForIdentifier) {
return matchingFactorForIdentifier.safeIdentifier;
}

if (matchingFactorForStrategy && 'safeIdentifier' in matchingFactorForStrategy) {
return matchingFactorForStrategy.safeIdentifier;
}
}

return identifier;
return signIn.identifier || '';
};
}

Expand Down
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions .changeset/two-apricots-serve.md
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
---
"@clerk/elements": patch
---

Fix `SignIn.SafeIdentifier` potentially outputting an incorrect identifier when using similar multi-session sign in strategies.
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
import type { SignInFirstFactor } from '@clerk/types';

import { SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy } from '../router.selectors';
import type { SignInRouterSnapshot } from '../router.types';

const IDENTIFIER = 'support@clerk.dev';

function createSnapshot(
supportedFirstFactors: Partial<SignInFirstFactor>[] = [],
identifier?: string,
): SignInRouterSnapshot {
return {
context: {
clerk: {
client: {
signIn: {
status: 'needs_first_factor',
supportedFirstFactors: supportedFirstFactors.map(f => ({
strategy: 'email_code',
emailAddressId: 'idn_foo',
...f,
})),
supportedSecondFactors: null,
identifier: identifier,
},
},
},
},
} as unknown as SignInRouterSnapshot;
}

describe('SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy', () => {
describe('Match: Identifier', () => {
it('should output support@clerk.dev (matchingFactorForIdentifier.safeIdentifier)', () => {
const snapshot = createSnapshot(
[
{
safeIdentifier: 's******@c****.com',
},
{
safeIdentifier: IDENTIFIER,
primary: true,
},
],
IDENTIFIER,
);

const result = SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy('email_code')(snapshot);
expect(result).toEqual(IDENTIFIER);
});
});

describe('Match: Strategy', () => {
it('should output support@clerk.dev (matchingFactorForStrategy.safeIdentifier)', () => {
const snapshot = createSnapshot(
[
{
safeIdentifier: 's******@c****.com',
},
{
safeIdentifier: IDENTIFIER,
primary: true,
},
],
IDENTIFIER,
);

const result = SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy('email_code')(snapshot);
expect(result).toEqual(IDENTIFIER);
});

it('should output s*****1@c****.com (matchingFactorForStrategy.safeIdentifier)', () => {
const snapshot = createSnapshot(
[
{
safeIdentifier: 's*****1@c****.com',
},
{
safeIdentifier: 's*****2@c****.com',
primary: true,
},
],
IDENTIFIER,
);

const result = SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy('email_code')(snapshot);
expect(result).toEqual('s*****1@c****.com');
});
});

describe('Match: Default', () => {
it('should output support@clerk.dev (signIn.identifier)', () => {
const snapshot = createSnapshot([], IDENTIFIER);
const result = SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy('email_code')(snapshot);
expect(result).toEqual(IDENTIFIER);
});

it('should output an empty string', () => {
const snapshot = createSnapshot([], undefined);
const result = SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy('email_code')(snapshot);
expect(result).toEqual('');
});
});
});
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -8,18 +8,30 @@ export function SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy(
): (s: SignInRouterSnapshot) => string {
return (s: SignInRouterSnapshot) => {
const signIn = s.context.clerk?.client.signIn;
const identifier = signIn.identifier || '';

if (strategy) {
const matchingFactor = [...(signIn.supportedFirstFactors ?? []), ...(signIn.supportedSecondFactors ?? [])].find(
f => f.strategy === strategy,
);
if (matchingFactor && 'safeIdentifier' in matchingFactor) {
return matchingFactor.safeIdentifier;
const matchingFactors = [
...(signIn.supportedFirstFactors ?? []),
...(signIn.supportedSecondFactors ?? []),
].filter(f => f.strategy === strategy);

const matchingFactorForIdentifier =
signIn.identifier && matchingFactors.length > 0
? matchingFactors.find(f => 'safeIdentifier' in f && f.safeIdentifier === signIn.identifier)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Requiring the factor's safeIdentifier to match the user provided identifier results in the user provided identifier being returned for factors in which it's not valid, for example rendering a phone number for email_code and email_link. Should we maybe break this logic up into two pieces?

constmatchingFactorForIdentifier=signIn.identifier&&matchingFactors.length>0
? matchingFactors.find((f)=>"safeIdentifier"inf&&f.safeIdentifier===signIn.identifier)
: null;constmatchingFactorForStrategy=matchingFactors[0];if(matchingFactorForIdentifier&&"safeIdentifier"inmatchingFactorForIdentifier){returnmatchingFactorForIdentifier.safeIdentifier;}elseif(matchingFactorForStrategy&&"safeIdentifier"inmatchingFactorForStrategy){returnmatchingFactorForStrategy.safeIdentifier;}

Screen Shot 2024-08-16 at 10 37 18 AM

: null;

const matchingFactorForStrategy = matchingFactors[0];

if (matchingFactorForIdentifier && 'safeIdentifier' in matchingFactorForIdentifier) {
return matchingFactorForIdentifier.safeIdentifier;
}

if (matchingFactorForStrategy && 'safeIdentifier' in matchingFactorForStrategy) {
return matchingFactorForStrategy.safeIdentifier;
}
}

return identifier;
return signIn.identifier || '';
};
}

Expand Down
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions .changeset/two-apricots-serve.md
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
---
"@clerk/elements": patch
---

Fix `SignIn.SafeIdentifier` potentially outputting an incorrect identifier when using similar multi-session sign in strategies.
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
import type { SignInFirstFactor } from '@clerk/types';

import { SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy } from '../router.selectors';
import type { SignInRouterSnapshot } from '../router.types';

const IDENTIFIER = 'support@clerk.dev';

function createSnapshot(
supportedFirstFactors: Partial<SignInFirstFactor>[] = [],
identifier?: string,
): SignInRouterSnapshot {
return {
context: {
clerk: {
client: {
signIn: {
status: 'needs_first_factor',
supportedFirstFactors: supportedFirstFactors.map(f => ({
strategy: 'email_code',
emailAddressId: 'idn_foo',
...f,
})),
supportedSecondFactors: null,
identifier: identifier,
},
},
},
},
} as unknown as SignInRouterSnapshot;
}

describe('SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy', () => {
describe('Match: Identifier', () => {
it('should output support@clerk.dev (matchingFactorForIdentifier.safeIdentifier)', () => {
const snapshot = createSnapshot(
[
{
safeIdentifier: 's******@c****.com',
},
{
safeIdentifier: IDENTIFIER,
primary: true,
},
],
IDENTIFIER,
);

const result = SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy('email_code')(snapshot);
expect(result).toEqual(IDENTIFIER);
});
});

describe('Match: Strategy', () => {
it('should output support@clerk.dev (matchingFactorForStrategy.safeIdentifier)', () => {
const snapshot = createSnapshot(
[
{
safeIdentifier: 's******@c****.com',
},
{
safeIdentifier: IDENTIFIER,
primary: true,
},
],
IDENTIFIER,
);

const result = SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy('email_code')(snapshot);
expect(result).toEqual(IDENTIFIER);
});

it('should output s*****1@c****.com (matchingFactorForStrategy.safeIdentifier)', () => {
const snapshot = createSnapshot(
[
{
safeIdentifier: 's*****1@c****.com',
},
{
safeIdentifier: 's*****2@c****.com',
primary: true,
},
],
IDENTIFIER,
);

const result = SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy('email_code')(snapshot);
expect(result).toEqual('s*****1@c****.com');
});
});

describe('Match: Default', () => {
it('should output support@clerk.dev (signIn.identifier)', () => {
const snapshot = createSnapshot([], IDENTIFIER);
const result = SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy('email_code')(snapshot);
expect(result).toEqual(IDENTIFIER);
});

it('should output an empty string', () => {
const snapshot = createSnapshot([], undefined);
const result = SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy('email_code')(snapshot);
expect(result).toEqual('');
});
});
});
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -8,18 +8,30 @@ export function SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy(
): (s: SignInRouterSnapshot) => string {
return (s: SignInRouterSnapshot) => {
const signIn = s.context.clerk?.client.signIn;
const identifier = signIn.identifier || '';

if (strategy) {
const matchingFactor = [...(signIn.supportedFirstFactors ?? []), ...(signIn.supportedSecondFactors ?? [])].find(
f => f.strategy === strategy,
);
if (matchingFactor && 'safeIdentifier' in matchingFactor) {
return matchingFactor.safeIdentifier;
const matchingFactors = [
...(signIn.supportedFirstFactors ?? []),
...(signIn.supportedSecondFactors ?? []),
].filter(f => f.strategy === strategy);

const matchingFactorForIdentifier =
signIn.identifier && matchingFactors.length > 0
? matchingFactors.find(f => 'safeIdentifier' in f && f.safeIdentifier === signIn.identifier)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Requiring the factor's safeIdentifier to match the user provided identifier results in the user provided identifier being returned for factors in which it's not valid, for example rendering a phone number for email_code and email_link. Should we maybe break this logic up into two pieces?

constmatchingFactorForIdentifier=signIn.identifier&&matchingFactors.length>0
? matchingFactors.find((f)=>"safeIdentifier"inf&&f.safeIdentifier===signIn.identifier)
: null;constmatchingFactorForStrategy=matchingFactors[0];if(matchingFactorForIdentifier&&"safeIdentifier"inmatchingFactorForIdentifier){returnmatchingFactorForIdentifier.safeIdentifier;}elseif(matchingFactorForStrategy&&"safeIdentifier"inmatchingFactorForStrategy){returnmatchingFactorForStrategy.safeIdentifier;}

Screen Shot 2024-08-16 at 10 37 18 AM

: null;

const matchingFactorForStrategy = matchingFactors[0];

if (matchingFactorForIdentifier && 'safeIdentifier' in matchingFactorForIdentifier) {
return matchingFactorForIdentifier.safeIdentifier;
}

if (matchingFactorForStrategy && 'safeIdentifier' in matchingFactorForStrategy) {
return matchingFactorForStrategy.safeIdentifier;
}
}

return identifier;
return signIn.identifier || '';
};
}

Expand Down
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions .changeset/two-apricots-serve.md
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
---
"@clerk/elements": patch
---

Fix `SignIn.SafeIdentifier` potentially outputting an incorrect identifier when using similar multi-session sign in strategies.
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
import type { SignInFirstFactor } from '@clerk/types';

import { SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy } from '../router.selectors';
import type { SignInRouterSnapshot } from '../router.types';

const IDENTIFIER = 'support@clerk.dev';

function createSnapshot(
supportedFirstFactors: Partial<SignInFirstFactor>[] = [],
identifier?: string,
): SignInRouterSnapshot {
return {
context: {
clerk: {
client: {
signIn: {
status: 'needs_first_factor',
supportedFirstFactors: supportedFirstFactors.map(f => ({
strategy: 'email_code',
emailAddressId: 'idn_foo',
...f,
})),
supportedSecondFactors: null,
identifier: identifier,
},
},
},
},
} as unknown as SignInRouterSnapshot;
}

describe('SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy', () => {
describe('Match: Identifier', () => {
it('should output support@clerk.dev (matchingFactorForIdentifier.safeIdentifier)', () => {
const snapshot = createSnapshot(
[
{
safeIdentifier: 's******@c****.com',
},
{
safeIdentifier: IDENTIFIER,
primary: true,
},
],
IDENTIFIER,
);

const result = SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy('email_code')(snapshot);
expect(result).toEqual(IDENTIFIER);
});
});

describe('Match: Strategy', () => {
it('should output support@clerk.dev (matchingFactorForStrategy.safeIdentifier)', () => {
const snapshot = createSnapshot(
[
{
safeIdentifier: 's******@c****.com',
},
{
safeIdentifier: IDENTIFIER,
primary: true,
},
],
IDENTIFIER,
);

const result = SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy('email_code')(snapshot);
expect(result).toEqual(IDENTIFIER);
});

it('should output s*****1@c****.com (matchingFactorForStrategy.safeIdentifier)', () => {
const snapshot = createSnapshot(
[
{
safeIdentifier: 's*****1@c****.com',
},
{
safeIdentifier: 's*****2@c****.com',
primary: true,
},
],
IDENTIFIER,
);

const result = SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy('email_code')(snapshot);
expect(result).toEqual('s*****1@c****.com');
});
});

describe('Match: Default', () => {
it('should output support@clerk.dev (signIn.identifier)', () => {
const snapshot = createSnapshot([], IDENTIFIER);
const result = SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy('email_code')(snapshot);
expect(result).toEqual(IDENTIFIER);
});

it('should output an empty string', () => {
const snapshot = createSnapshot([], undefined);
const result = SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy('email_code')(snapshot);
expect(result).toEqual('');
});
});
});
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -8,18 +8,30 @@ export function SignInSafeIdentifierSelectorForStrategy(
): (s: SignInRouterSnapshot) => string {
return (s: SignInRouterSnapshot) => {
const signIn = s.context.clerk?.client.signIn;
const identifier = signIn.identifier || '';

if (strategy) {
const matchingFactor = [...(signIn.supportedFirstFactors ?? []), ...(signIn.supportedSecondFactors ?? [])].find(
f => f.strategy === strategy,
);
if (matchingFactor && 'safeIdentifier' in matchingFactor) {
return matchingFactor.safeIdentifier;
const matchingFactors = [
...(signIn.supportedFirstFactors ?? []),
...(signIn.supportedSecondFactors ?? []),
].filter(f => f.strategy === strategy);

const matchingFactorForIdentifier =
signIn.identifier && matchingFactors.length > 0
? matchingFactors.find(f => 'safeIdentifier' in f && f.safeIdentifier === signIn.identifier)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Requiring the factor's safeIdentifier to match the user provided identifier results in the user provided identifier being returned for factors in which it's not valid, for example rendering a phone number for email_code and email_link. Should we maybe break this logic up into two pieces?

constmatchingFactorForIdentifier=signIn.identifier&&matchingFactors.length>0
? matchingFactors.find((f)=>"safeIdentifier"inf&&f.safeIdentifier===signIn.identifier)
: null;constmatchingFactorForStrategy=matchingFactors[0];if(matchingFactorForIdentifier&&"safeIdentifier"inmatchingFactorForIdentifier){returnmatchingFactorForIdentifier.safeIdentifier;}elseif(matchingFactorForStrategy&&"safeIdentifier"inmatchingFactorForStrategy){returnmatchingFactorForStrategy.safeIdentifier;}

Screen Shot 2024-08-16 at 10 37 18 AM

: null;

const matchingFactorForStrategy = matchingFactors[0];

if (matchingFactorForIdentifier && 'safeIdentifier' in matchingFactorForIdentifier) {
return matchingFactorForIdentifier.safeIdentifier;
}

if (matchingFactorForStrategy && 'safeIdentifier' in matchingFactorForStrategy) {
return matchingFactorForStrategy.safeIdentifier;
}
}

return identifier;
return signIn.identifier || '';
};
}

Expand Down