feat(#426): system info utility

[sarsharma]

command to show system info output for bug reports

Issue #426

Description

As mentioned in issue #426 , a single line command would be preferable to fetch system information
I added a --report flag to the version command for doing that.

Checklist

• Add test cases to all the changes you introduce
• Run ./script/format and ./script/test locally to ensure this change passes linter check and test
• Test the changes on the local machine manually
• Update the documentation for the changes

Expected behavior

System info can be output using a single command which can be attached to bug report

Steps to Test This Pull Request

commitizen version --report

Additional context

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #427 (f8e2224) into master (ca0e4bc) will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #427 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 97.90% 97.91% +0.01% 
==========================================
Files 39 39 Lines 1384 1392 +8 ==========================================
+ Hits 1355 1363 +8 
Misses 29 29 

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	97.91% <100.00%> (+0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
commitizen/cli.py	97.61% <ø> (ø)
commitizen/__version__.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
commitizen/commands/version.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ca31452...f8e2224. Read the comment docs.

[Lee-W]

looks like the behavior of argparse has been changed on python 3.9. let me see how I can solve it

[Lee-W]

Hi @sarthaksharma2199 , thanks for the immediate PR! I'm good with the --report flag. @woile what do you think?

One thing to note is that we'll need to wait for #430 to be merged. As a new fix on Python 3.9.7 breaks our unit test

[woile]

Looks good to me, thank you! 🙏🏻
I think it has to be rebased in order to fix the errors.

[sarsharma]

Hello, thanks for the approval @Lee-W and @woile
I had been trying to merge instead of rebase, hence the mess above.
I tried rebase this time instead, not sure if it is correct.
Please let me know if this needs to be done differently.

[Lee-W]

It looks great! Thanks! Let's merge it