[version.syn] Bump value of __cpp_lib_constexpr_complex - #6421
Merged
Merged
Conversation
... for P1383R2.
Member
|
@jwakely , what do you think? |
Contributor
|
@jwakely, @CaseyCarter: thoughts? |
Contributor
Author
|
ping @jwakely @CaseyCarter |
jwakely
approved these changes
Sep 11, 2023
jwakely
left a comment
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sorry for missing the pings, I agree with this suggestion.
Member
|
@tkoeppe , should this go to the DIS as well? |
Contributor
|
Sure, will do! |
Contributor
|
Wait, no, the paper is for C++26. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
P1383R2 "More
constexprfor<cmath>and<complex>" modifies two headers. 8571e94 updated__cpp_lib_constexpr_cmath, but I believe that__cpp_lib_constexpr_complexshould also be updated.SD6 already lists this new value. See https://wg21.link/sd6#__cpp_lib_constexpr_complex.