Skip to content

/split: per-subtask repo routing and two-phase proposals - #3

Merged
JPDuchesne merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
split-two-phase-routing
Jul 18, 2026
Merged

/split: per-subtask repo routing and two-phase proposals#3
JPDuchesne merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
split-two-phase-routing

Conversation

@JPDuchesne

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • /split becomes plan/apply: --dry runs the one agent pass (full annotated repo menu, per-subtask repo field, existing: schema, deterministic # possible match: discovery) and stages an editable fenced-yaml ## Subtasks section in the plan body; --apply executes exactly that section with no agent call — create per repo, adopt parentless existing: issues / reference parented ones, Intended repo: fallback + warning where the App isn't installed, close stale, fully qualified Depends on: owner/repo#n — then rewrites the section into a linked map (canonicity transfers to the sub-issues). Bare /split does both.
  • /build is state-aware on issues: refuses on a staged (unapplied) spec, proceeds with a note when open sub-issues exist.
  • /build --split keys dependencies by owner/repo#n, skips undrivable nodes (intended-repo fallbacks, adopted/referenced externals from the applied map) with explicit warnings, and reports dependents blocked — including on open external dependencies.
  • New normative docs: docs/commands.md (per-surface reference, refusals verbatim) and docs/plan-lifecycle.md (end-to-end narrative + body conventions); README/architecture trimmed to pointers.

Closes#2

Test plan

  • bundle exec rake test — 72 tests, 0 failures (new coverage: routing, fallback+warning, dry stages without creating, hand-edited apply without agent, refusals, adopt vs reference, possible-match annotation, skip/block checklist, /build guards)
  • Live: /split --dry on plans#5, hand-edit, --apply, cross-repo children; /build guard behaviors

Made with Cursor

The agent proposes with a full annotated repo menu (Target repos: narrows
it) and a per-subtask repo field; deterministic Ruby enforces reality at
apply (App-not-installed fallback with an Intended repo: note, never a
silent reroute). --dry stages the proposal as an editable fenced-yaml
## Subtasks section in the plan body; --apply executes exactly that
section with no agent call (adopt/reference existing: issues, close
stale, fully qualified Depends on:), then rewrites it into a linked map —
canonicity transfers to the sub-issues. /build refuses on a staged spec
and notes open sub-issues; /build --split skips undrivable nodes with
warnings and reports blocked dependents. New docs/commands.md and
docs/plan-lifecycle.md are the normative references.
Part of #2
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
@JPDuchesne
JPDuchesne merged commit 773ed33 into mainJul 18, 2026
1 check passed
@JPDuchesneJPDuchesne mentioned this pull request Jul 18, 2026
3 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

/split: per-subtask repo routing and two-phase proposals

1 participant

@JPDuchesne
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
/split: per-subtask repo routing and two-phase proposals by JPDuchesne · Pull Request #3 · d3mlabs/ai-flow · GitHub
Skip to content

/split: per-subtask repo routing and two-phase proposals - #3

Merged
JPDuchesne merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
split-two-phase-routing
Jul 18, 2026
Merged

/split: per-subtask repo routing and two-phase proposals#3
JPDuchesne merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
split-two-phase-routing

Conversation

@JPDuchesne

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • /split becomes plan/apply: --dry runs the one agent pass (full annotated repo menu, per-subtask repo field, existing: schema, deterministic # possible match: discovery) and stages an editable fenced-yaml ## Subtasks section in the plan body; --apply executes exactly that section with no agent call — create per repo, adopt parentless existing: issues / reference parented ones, Intended repo: fallback + warning where the App isn't installed, close stale, fully qualified Depends on: owner/repo#n — then rewrites the section into a linked map (canonicity transfers to the sub-issues). Bare /split does both.
  • /build is state-aware on issues: refuses on a staged (unapplied) spec, proceeds with a note when open sub-issues exist.
  • /build --split keys dependencies by owner/repo#n, skips undrivable nodes (intended-repo fallbacks, adopted/referenced externals from the applied map) with explicit warnings, and reports dependents blocked — including on open external dependencies.
  • New normative docs: docs/commands.md (per-surface reference, refusals verbatim) and docs/plan-lifecycle.md (end-to-end narrative + body conventions); README/architecture trimmed to pointers.

Closes#2

Test plan

  • bundle exec rake test — 72 tests, 0 failures (new coverage: routing, fallback+warning, dry stages without creating, hand-edited apply without agent, refusals, adopt vs reference, possible-match annotation, skip/block checklist, /build guards)
  • Live: /split --dry on plans#5, hand-edit, --apply, cross-repo children; /build guard behaviors

Made with Cursor

The agent proposes with a full annotated repo menu (Target repos: narrows
it) and a per-subtask repo field; deterministic Ruby enforces reality at
apply (App-not-installed fallback with an Intended repo: note, never a
silent reroute). --dry stages the proposal as an editable fenced-yaml
## Subtasks section in the plan body; --apply executes exactly that
section with no agent call (adopt/reference existing: issues, close
stale, fully qualified Depends on:), then rewrites it into a linked map —
canonicity transfers to the sub-issues. /build refuses on a staged spec
and notes open sub-issues; /build --split skips undrivable nodes with
warnings and reports blocked dependents. New docs/commands.md and
docs/plan-lifecycle.md are the normative references.
Part of #2
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
@JPDuchesne
JPDuchesne merged commit 773ed33 into mainJul 18, 2026
1 check passed
@JPDuchesneJPDuchesne mentioned this pull request Jul 18, 2026
3 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

/split: per-subtask repo routing and two-phase proposals

1 participant

@JPDuchesne
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' /split: per-subtask repo routing and two-phase proposals by JPDuchesne · Pull Request #3 · d3mlabs/ai-flow · GitHub
Skip to content

/split: per-subtask repo routing and two-phase proposals - #3

Merged
JPDuchesne merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
split-two-phase-routing
Jul 18, 2026
Merged

/split: per-subtask repo routing and two-phase proposals#3
JPDuchesne merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
split-two-phase-routing

Conversation

@JPDuchesne

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • /split becomes plan/apply: --dry runs the one agent pass (full annotated repo menu, per-subtask repo field, existing: schema, deterministic # possible match: discovery) and stages an editable fenced-yaml ## Subtasks section in the plan body; --apply executes exactly that section with no agent call — create per repo, adopt parentless existing: issues / reference parented ones, Intended repo: fallback + warning where the App isn't installed, close stale, fully qualified Depends on: owner/repo#n — then rewrites the section into a linked map (canonicity transfers to the sub-issues). Bare /split does both.
  • /build is state-aware on issues: refuses on a staged (unapplied) spec, proceeds with a note when open sub-issues exist.
  • /build --split keys dependencies by owner/repo#n, skips undrivable nodes (intended-repo fallbacks, adopted/referenced externals from the applied map) with explicit warnings, and reports dependents blocked — including on open external dependencies.
  • New normative docs: docs/commands.md (per-surface reference, refusals verbatim) and docs/plan-lifecycle.md (end-to-end narrative + body conventions); README/architecture trimmed to pointers.

Closes#2

Test plan

  • bundle exec rake test — 72 tests, 0 failures (new coverage: routing, fallback+warning, dry stages without creating, hand-edited apply without agent, refusals, adopt vs reference, possible-match annotation, skip/block checklist, /build guards)
  • Live: /split --dry on plans#5, hand-edit, --apply, cross-repo children; /build guard behaviors

Made with Cursor

The agent proposes with a full annotated repo menu (Target repos: narrows
it) and a per-subtask repo field; deterministic Ruby enforces reality at
apply (App-not-installed fallback with an Intended repo: note, never a
silent reroute). --dry stages the proposal as an editable fenced-yaml
## Subtasks section in the plan body; --apply executes exactly that
section with no agent call (adopt/reference existing: issues, close
stale, fully qualified Depends on:), then rewrites it into a linked map —
canonicity transfers to the sub-issues. /build refuses on a staged spec
and notes open sub-issues; /build --split skips undrivable nodes with
warnings and reports blocked dependents. New docs/commands.md and
docs/plan-lifecycle.md are the normative references.
Part of #2
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
@JPDuchesne
JPDuchesne merged commit 773ed33 into mainJul 18, 2026
1 check passed
@JPDuchesneJPDuchesne mentioned this pull request Jul 18, 2026
3 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

/split: per-subtask repo routing and two-phase proposals

1 participant

@JPDuchesne
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' /split: per-subtask repo routing and two-phase proposals by JPDuchesne · Pull Request #3 · d3mlabs/ai-flow · GitHub
Skip to content

/split: per-subtask repo routing and two-phase proposals - #3

Merged
JPDuchesne merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
split-two-phase-routing
Jul 18, 2026
Merged

/split: per-subtask repo routing and two-phase proposals#3
JPDuchesne merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
split-two-phase-routing

Conversation

@JPDuchesne

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • /split becomes plan/apply: --dry runs the one agent pass (full annotated repo menu, per-subtask repo field, existing: schema, deterministic # possible match: discovery) and stages an editable fenced-yaml ## Subtasks section in the plan body; --apply executes exactly that section with no agent call — create per repo, adopt parentless existing: issues / reference parented ones, Intended repo: fallback + warning where the App isn't installed, close stale, fully qualified Depends on: owner/repo#n — then rewrites the section into a linked map (canonicity transfers to the sub-issues). Bare /split does both.
  • /build is state-aware on issues: refuses on a staged (unapplied) spec, proceeds with a note when open sub-issues exist.
  • /build --split keys dependencies by owner/repo#n, skips undrivable nodes (intended-repo fallbacks, adopted/referenced externals from the applied map) with explicit warnings, and reports dependents blocked — including on open external dependencies.
  • New normative docs: docs/commands.md (per-surface reference, refusals verbatim) and docs/plan-lifecycle.md (end-to-end narrative + body conventions); README/architecture trimmed to pointers.

Closes#2

Test plan

  • bundle exec rake test — 72 tests, 0 failures (new coverage: routing, fallback+warning, dry stages without creating, hand-edited apply without agent, refusals, adopt vs reference, possible-match annotation, skip/block checklist, /build guards)
  • Live: /split --dry on plans#5, hand-edit, --apply, cross-repo children; /build guard behaviors

Made with Cursor

The agent proposes with a full annotated repo menu (Target repos: narrows
it) and a per-subtask repo field; deterministic Ruby enforces reality at
apply (App-not-installed fallback with an Intended repo: note, never a
silent reroute). --dry stages the proposal as an editable fenced-yaml
## Subtasks section in the plan body; --apply executes exactly that
section with no agent call (adopt/reference existing: issues, close
stale, fully qualified Depends on:), then rewrites it into a linked map —
canonicity transfers to the sub-issues. /build refuses on a staged spec
and notes open sub-issues; /build --split skips undrivable nodes with
warnings and reports blocked dependents. New docs/commands.md and
docs/plan-lifecycle.md are the normative references.
Part of #2
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
@JPDuchesne
JPDuchesne merged commit 773ed33 into mainJul 18, 2026
1 check passed
@JPDuchesneJPDuchesne mentioned this pull request Jul 18, 2026
3 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

/split: per-subtask repo routing and two-phase proposals

1 participant

@JPDuchesne
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' /split: per-subtask repo routing and two-phase proposals by JPDuchesne · Pull Request #3 · d3mlabs/ai-flow · GitHub
Skip to content

/split: per-subtask repo routing and two-phase proposals - #3

Merged
JPDuchesne merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
split-two-phase-routing
Jul 18, 2026
Merged

/split: per-subtask repo routing and two-phase proposals#3
JPDuchesne merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
split-two-phase-routing

Conversation

@JPDuchesne

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • /split becomes plan/apply: --dry runs the one agent pass (full annotated repo menu, per-subtask repo field, existing: schema, deterministic # possible match: discovery) and stages an editable fenced-yaml ## Subtasks section in the plan body; --apply executes exactly that section with no agent call — create per repo, adopt parentless existing: issues / reference parented ones, Intended repo: fallback + warning where the App isn't installed, close stale, fully qualified Depends on: owner/repo#n — then rewrites the section into a linked map (canonicity transfers to the sub-issues). Bare /split does both.
  • /build is state-aware on issues: refuses on a staged (unapplied) spec, proceeds with a note when open sub-issues exist.
  • /build --split keys dependencies by owner/repo#n, skips undrivable nodes (intended-repo fallbacks, adopted/referenced externals from the applied map) with explicit warnings, and reports dependents blocked — including on open external dependencies.
  • New normative docs: docs/commands.md (per-surface reference, refusals verbatim) and docs/plan-lifecycle.md (end-to-end narrative + body conventions); README/architecture trimmed to pointers.

Closes#2

Test plan

  • bundle exec rake test — 72 tests, 0 failures (new coverage: routing, fallback+warning, dry stages without creating, hand-edited apply without agent, refusals, adopt vs reference, possible-match annotation, skip/block checklist, /build guards)
  • Live: /split --dry on plans#5, hand-edit, --apply, cross-repo children; /build guard behaviors

Made with Cursor

The agent proposes with a full annotated repo menu (Target repos: narrows
it) and a per-subtask repo field; deterministic Ruby enforces reality at
apply (App-not-installed fallback with an Intended repo: note, never a
silent reroute). --dry stages the proposal as an editable fenced-yaml
## Subtasks section in the plan body; --apply executes exactly that
section with no agent call (adopt/reference existing: issues, close
stale, fully qualified Depends on:), then rewrites it into a linked map —
canonicity transfers to the sub-issues. /build refuses on a staged spec
and notes open sub-issues; /build --split skips undrivable nodes with
warnings and reports blocked dependents. New docs/commands.md and
docs/plan-lifecycle.md are the normative references.
Part of #2
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
@JPDuchesne
JPDuchesne merged commit 773ed33 into mainJul 18, 2026
1 check passed
@JPDuchesneJPDuchesne mentioned this pull request Jul 18, 2026
3 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

/split: per-subtask repo routing and two-phase proposals

1 participant

@JPDuchesne
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' /split: per-subtask repo routing and two-phase proposals by JPDuchesne · Pull Request #3 · d3mlabs/ai-flow · GitHub
Skip to content

/split: per-subtask repo routing and two-phase proposals - #3

Merged
JPDuchesne merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
split-two-phase-routing
Jul 18, 2026
Merged

/split: per-subtask repo routing and two-phase proposals#3
JPDuchesne merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
split-two-phase-routing

Conversation

@JPDuchesne

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • /split becomes plan/apply: --dry runs the one agent pass (full annotated repo menu, per-subtask repo field, existing: schema, deterministic # possible match: discovery) and stages an editable fenced-yaml ## Subtasks section in the plan body; --apply executes exactly that section with no agent call — create per repo, adopt parentless existing: issues / reference parented ones, Intended repo: fallback + warning where the App isn't installed, close stale, fully qualified Depends on: owner/repo#n — then rewrites the section into a linked map (canonicity transfers to the sub-issues). Bare /split does both.
  • /build is state-aware on issues: refuses on a staged (unapplied) spec, proceeds with a note when open sub-issues exist.
  • /build --split keys dependencies by owner/repo#n, skips undrivable nodes (intended-repo fallbacks, adopted/referenced externals from the applied map) with explicit warnings, and reports dependents blocked — including on open external dependencies.
  • New normative docs: docs/commands.md (per-surface reference, refusals verbatim) and docs/plan-lifecycle.md (end-to-end narrative + body conventions); README/architecture trimmed to pointers.

Closes#2

Test plan

  • bundle exec rake test — 72 tests, 0 failures (new coverage: routing, fallback+warning, dry stages without creating, hand-edited apply without agent, refusals, adopt vs reference, possible-match annotation, skip/block checklist, /build guards)
  • Live: /split --dry on plans#5, hand-edit, --apply, cross-repo children; /build guard behaviors

Made with Cursor

The agent proposes with a full annotated repo menu (Target repos: narrows
it) and a per-subtask repo field; deterministic Ruby enforces reality at
apply (App-not-installed fallback with an Intended repo: note, never a
silent reroute). --dry stages the proposal as an editable fenced-yaml
## Subtasks section in the plan body; --apply executes exactly that
section with no agent call (adopt/reference existing: issues, close
stale, fully qualified Depends on:), then rewrites it into a linked map —
canonicity transfers to the sub-issues. /build refuses on a staged spec
and notes open sub-issues; /build --split skips undrivable nodes with
warnings and reports blocked dependents. New docs/commands.md and
docs/plan-lifecycle.md are the normative references.
Part of #2
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
@JPDuchesne
JPDuchesne merged commit 773ed33 into mainJul 18, 2026
1 check passed
@JPDuchesneJPDuchesne mentioned this pull request Jul 18, 2026
3 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

/split: per-subtask repo routing and two-phase proposals

1 participant

@JPDuchesne
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' /split: per-subtask repo routing and two-phase proposals by JPDuchesne · Pull Request #3 · d3mlabs/ai-flow · GitHub
Skip to content

/split: per-subtask repo routing and two-phase proposals - #3

Merged
JPDuchesne merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
split-two-phase-routing
Jul 18, 2026
Merged

/split: per-subtask repo routing and two-phase proposals#3
JPDuchesne merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
split-two-phase-routing

Conversation

@JPDuchesne

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • /split becomes plan/apply: --dry runs the one agent pass (full annotated repo menu, per-subtask repo field, existing: schema, deterministic # possible match: discovery) and stages an editable fenced-yaml ## Subtasks section in the plan body; --apply executes exactly that section with no agent call — create per repo, adopt parentless existing: issues / reference parented ones, Intended repo: fallback + warning where the App isn't installed, close stale, fully qualified Depends on: owner/repo#n — then rewrites the section into a linked map (canonicity transfers to the sub-issues). Bare /split does both.
  • /build is state-aware on issues: refuses on a staged (unapplied) spec, proceeds with a note when open sub-issues exist.
  • /build --split keys dependencies by owner/repo#n, skips undrivable nodes (intended-repo fallbacks, adopted/referenced externals from the applied map) with explicit warnings, and reports dependents blocked — including on open external dependencies.
  • New normative docs: docs/commands.md (per-surface reference, refusals verbatim) and docs/plan-lifecycle.md (end-to-end narrative + body conventions); README/architecture trimmed to pointers.

Closes#2

Test plan

  • bundle exec rake test — 72 tests, 0 failures (new coverage: routing, fallback+warning, dry stages without creating, hand-edited apply without agent, refusals, adopt vs reference, possible-match annotation, skip/block checklist, /build guards)
  • Live: /split --dry on plans#5, hand-edit, --apply, cross-repo children; /build guard behaviors

Made with Cursor

The agent proposes with a full annotated repo menu (Target repos: narrows
it) and a per-subtask repo field; deterministic Ruby enforces reality at
apply (App-not-installed fallback with an Intended repo: note, never a
silent reroute). --dry stages the proposal as an editable fenced-yaml
## Subtasks section in the plan body; --apply executes exactly that
section with no agent call (adopt/reference existing: issues, close
stale, fully qualified Depends on:), then rewrites it into a linked map —
canonicity transfers to the sub-issues. /build refuses on a staged spec
and notes open sub-issues; /build --split skips undrivable nodes with
warnings and reports blocked dependents. New docs/commands.md and
docs/plan-lifecycle.md are the normative references.
Part of #2
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
@JPDuchesne
JPDuchesne merged commit 773ed33 into mainJul 18, 2026
1 check passed
@JPDuchesneJPDuchesne mentioned this pull request Jul 18, 2026
3 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

/split: per-subtask repo routing and two-phase proposals

1 participant

@JPDuchesne
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); /split: per-subtask repo routing and two-phase proposals by JPDuchesne · Pull Request #3 · d3mlabs/ai-flow · GitHub
Skip to content

/split: per-subtask repo routing and two-phase proposals - #3

Merged
JPDuchesne merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
split-two-phase-routing
Jul 18, 2026
Merged

/split: per-subtask repo routing and two-phase proposals#3
JPDuchesne merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
split-two-phase-routing

Conversation

@JPDuchesne

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • /split becomes plan/apply: --dry runs the one agent pass (full annotated repo menu, per-subtask repo field, existing: schema, deterministic # possible match: discovery) and stages an editable fenced-yaml ## Subtasks section in the plan body; --apply executes exactly that section with no agent call — create per repo, adopt parentless existing: issues / reference parented ones, Intended repo: fallback + warning where the App isn't installed, close stale, fully qualified Depends on: owner/repo#n — then rewrites the section into a linked map (canonicity transfers to the sub-issues). Bare /split does both.
  • /build is state-aware on issues: refuses on a staged (unapplied) spec, proceeds with a note when open sub-issues exist.
  • /build --split keys dependencies by owner/repo#n, skips undrivable nodes (intended-repo fallbacks, adopted/referenced externals from the applied map) with explicit warnings, and reports dependents blocked — including on open external dependencies.
  • New normative docs: docs/commands.md (per-surface reference, refusals verbatim) and docs/plan-lifecycle.md (end-to-end narrative + body conventions); README/architecture trimmed to pointers.

Closes#2

Test plan

  • bundle exec rake test — 72 tests, 0 failures (new coverage: routing, fallback+warning, dry stages without creating, hand-edited apply without agent, refusals, adopt vs reference, possible-match annotation, skip/block checklist, /build guards)
  • Live: /split --dry on plans#5, hand-edit, --apply, cross-repo children; /build guard behaviors

Made with Cursor

The agent proposes with a full annotated repo menu (Target repos: narrows
it) and a per-subtask repo field; deterministic Ruby enforces reality at
apply (App-not-installed fallback with an Intended repo: note, never a
silent reroute). --dry stages the proposal as an editable fenced-yaml
## Subtasks section in the plan body; --apply executes exactly that
section with no agent call (adopt/reference existing: issues, close
stale, fully qualified Depends on:), then rewrites it into a linked map —
canonicity transfers to the sub-issues. /build refuses on a staged spec
and notes open sub-issues; /build --split skips undrivable nodes with
warnings and reports blocked dependents. New docs/commands.md and
docs/plan-lifecycle.md are the normative references.
Part of #2
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
@JPDuchesne
JPDuchesne merged commit 773ed33 into mainJul 18, 2026
1 check passed
@JPDuchesneJPDuchesne mentioned this pull request Jul 18, 2026
3 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

/split: per-subtask repo routing and two-phase proposals

1 participant

@JPDuchesne