Skip to content

Search results don't always put the closest match first #138

Description

@DenDanskeMine

Typing 10.x.x.13 in the assign-IP picker listed .137, .131 and friends above the exact .13 - the list came back in whatever order the query produced.

The IP list is fixed now (exact match first, then prefix, then substring, numeric order inside each band), but other search surfaces probably have the same problem: global search, the object pickers' compact lists, and anything else that filters with a contains-match and leaves the ordering to the model. Anywhere the closest hit isn't on top should get the same ranking.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

Projects

  • Status
    Todo

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions

, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Search results don't always put the closest match first · Issue #138 · danbyte-net/danbyte · GitHub
Skip to content

Search results don't always put the closest match first #138

Description

@DenDanskeMine

Typing 10.x.x.13 in the assign-IP picker listed .137, .131 and friends above the exact .13 - the list came back in whatever order the query produced.

The IP list is fixed now (exact match first, then prefix, then substring, numeric order inside each band), but other search surfaces probably have the same problem: global search, the object pickers' compact lists, and anything else that filters with a contains-match and leaves the ordering to the model. Anywhere the closest hit isn't on top should get the same ranking.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

Projects

  • Status
    Todo

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions

, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Search results don't always put the closest match first · Issue #138 · danbyte-net/danbyte · GitHub
Skip to content

Search results don't always put the closest match first #138

Description

@DenDanskeMine

Typing 10.x.x.13 in the assign-IP picker listed .137, .131 and friends above the exact .13 - the list came back in whatever order the query produced.

The IP list is fixed now (exact match first, then prefix, then substring, numeric order inside each band), but other search surfaces probably have the same problem: global search, the object pickers' compact lists, and anything else that filters with a contains-match and leaves the ordering to the model. Anywhere the closest hit isn't on top should get the same ranking.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

Projects

  • Status
    Todo

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions

, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Search results don't always put the closest match first · Issue #138 · danbyte-net/danbyte · GitHub
Skip to content

Search results don't always put the closest match first #138

Description

@DenDanskeMine

Typing 10.x.x.13 in the assign-IP picker listed .137, .131 and friends above the exact .13 - the list came back in whatever order the query produced.

The IP list is fixed now (exact match first, then prefix, then substring, numeric order inside each band), but other search surfaces probably have the same problem: global search, the object pickers' compact lists, and anything else that filters with a contains-match and leaves the ordering to the model. Anywhere the closest hit isn't on top should get the same ranking.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

Projects

  • Status
    Todo

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions

, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' Search results don't always put the closest match first · Issue #138 · danbyte-net/danbyte · GitHub
Skip to content

Search results don't always put the closest match first #138

Description

@DenDanskeMine

Typing 10.x.x.13 in the assign-IP picker listed .137, .131 and friends above the exact .13 - the list came back in whatever order the query produced.

The IP list is fixed now (exact match first, then prefix, then substring, numeric order inside each band), but other search surfaces probably have the same problem: global search, the object pickers' compact lists, and anything else that filters with a contains-match and leaves the ordering to the model. Anywhere the closest hit isn't on top should get the same ranking.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

Projects

  • Status
    Todo

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions

, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Search results don't always put the closest match first · Issue #138 · danbyte-net/danbyte · GitHub
Skip to content

Search results don't always put the closest match first #138

Description

@DenDanskeMine

Typing 10.x.x.13 in the assign-IP picker listed .137, .131 and friends above the exact .13 - the list came back in whatever order the query produced.

The IP list is fixed now (exact match first, then prefix, then substring, numeric order inside each band), but other search surfaces probably have the same problem: global search, the object pickers' compact lists, and anything else that filters with a contains-match and leaves the ordering to the model. Anywhere the closest hit isn't on top should get the same ranking.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

Projects

  • Status
    Todo

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions

, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Search results don't always put the closest match first · Issue #138 · danbyte-net/danbyte · GitHub
Skip to content

Search results don't always put the closest match first #138

Description

@DenDanskeMine

Typing 10.x.x.13 in the assign-IP picker listed .137, .131 and friends above the exact .13 - the list came back in whatever order the query produced.

The IP list is fixed now (exact match first, then prefix, then substring, numeric order inside each band), but other search surfaces probably have the same problem: global search, the object pickers' compact lists, and anything else that filters with a contains-match and leaves the ordering to the model. Anywhere the closest hit isn't on top should get the same ranking.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

Projects

  • Status
    Todo

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions

, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); Search results don't always put the closest match first · Issue #138 · danbyte-net/danbyte · GitHub
Skip to content

Search results don't always put the closest match first #138

Description

@DenDanskeMine

Typing 10.x.x.13 in the assign-IP picker listed .137, .131 and friends above the exact .13 - the list came back in whatever order the query produced.

The IP list is fixed now (exact match first, then prefix, then substring, numeric order inside each band), but other search surfaces probably have the same problem: global search, the object pickers' compact lists, and anything else that filters with a contains-match and leaves the ordering to the model. Anywhere the closest hit isn't on top should get the same ranking.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

Projects

  • Status
    Todo

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions