Skip to content

Devvynpm volume ro support - #444

Closed
devvyn wants to merge 5 commits into
docker:masterfrom
devvyn:devvynpm-volume-ro-support
Closed

Devvynpm volume ro support#444
devvyn wants to merge 5 commits into
docker:masterfrom
devvyn:devvynpm-volume-ro-support

Conversation

@devvyn

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Slight change to splitting of the volume argument, to align with Docker's handling of the equivalent argument.

@aanand

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks! Looks good.

  1. Could we get an integration test?
  2. The documentation for volumes needs updating.
  3. I'd rather split_volume always returned a tuple of the same length, with the last part always being either ro or rw.
  4. split_volume's docstring needs updating.
  5. Could you squash it into one commit?
  6. Commits need to be signed off.

@devvyn

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Ha ha, I would like to apologize: I meant to practice this on my fork
before submitting seriously, but I failed to notice whose repository I'd
applied the push to.

By the way, I think there is an issue on file (#260
#260) which applies and another issue
(#363#363) which touches on fully
supporting all Docker arguments, which would include volume permissions. If
I can manage to wrangle git to do this properly, I will try this again in
reference to one or both issues.

Thanks for your helpful response. This will certainly help me succeed in my
next attempted pull request.

Devvyn Murphy
OTV Technologies Ltd.
2915B Faithfull Ave
Saskatoon, SK S7K 8E8
otvtech.com
T:1 (306) 374-0607, 283

M:+13068802322

On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Aanand Prasad notifications@github.com
wrote:

Thanks! Looks good.

  1. Could we get an integration test?
  2. The documentation for volumes needs updating.
  3. I'd rather split_volume always returned a tuple of the same length,
    with the last part always being either ro or rw.
  4. split_volume's docstring needs updating.
  5. Could you squash it into one commit?
  6. Commits need to be signed off
    https://github.com/docker/fig/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#sign-your-work
    .

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#444 (comment).

@dnephin

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@devvynm if you're interested, I sent in a PR yesterday (#442) which adds this support along with additional validation and unit tests

@bfirshbfirsh closed this Sep 4, 2014
@devvyn

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@dnephin Very happy to hear that. Thanks for letting me know.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@devvyn@aanand@dnephin@bfirsh
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Devvynpm volume ro support by devvyn · Pull Request #444 · docker/compose · GitHub
Skip to content

Devvynpm volume ro support - #444

Closed
devvyn wants to merge 5 commits into
docker:masterfrom
devvyn:devvynpm-volume-ro-support
Closed

Devvynpm volume ro support#444
devvyn wants to merge 5 commits into
docker:masterfrom
devvyn:devvynpm-volume-ro-support

Conversation

@devvyn

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Slight change to splitting of the volume argument, to align with Docker's handling of the equivalent argument.

@aanand

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks! Looks good.

  1. Could we get an integration test?
  2. The documentation for volumes needs updating.
  3. I'd rather split_volume always returned a tuple of the same length, with the last part always being either ro or rw.
  4. split_volume's docstring needs updating.
  5. Could you squash it into one commit?
  6. Commits need to be signed off.

@devvyn

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Ha ha, I would like to apologize: I meant to practice this on my fork
before submitting seriously, but I failed to notice whose repository I'd
applied the push to.

By the way, I think there is an issue on file (#260
#260) which applies and another issue
(#363#363) which touches on fully
supporting all Docker arguments, which would include volume permissions. If
I can manage to wrangle git to do this properly, I will try this again in
reference to one or both issues.

Thanks for your helpful response. This will certainly help me succeed in my
next attempted pull request.

Devvyn Murphy
OTV Technologies Ltd.
2915B Faithfull Ave
Saskatoon, SK S7K 8E8
otvtech.com
T:1 (306) 374-0607, 283

M:+13068802322

On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Aanand Prasad notifications@github.com
wrote:

Thanks! Looks good.

  1. Could we get an integration test?
  2. The documentation for volumes needs updating.
  3. I'd rather split_volume always returned a tuple of the same length,
    with the last part always being either ro or rw.
  4. split_volume's docstring needs updating.
  5. Could you squash it into one commit?
  6. Commits need to be signed off
    https://github.com/docker/fig/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#sign-your-work
    .

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#444 (comment).

@dnephin

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@devvynm if you're interested, I sent in a PR yesterday (#442) which adds this support along with additional validation and unit tests

@bfirshbfirsh closed this Sep 4, 2014
@devvyn

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@dnephin Very happy to hear that. Thanks for letting me know.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@devvyn@aanand@dnephin@bfirsh
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Devvynpm volume ro support by devvyn · Pull Request #444 · docker/compose · GitHub
Skip to content

Devvynpm volume ro support - #444

Closed
devvyn wants to merge 5 commits into
docker:masterfrom
devvyn:devvynpm-volume-ro-support
Closed

Devvynpm volume ro support#444
devvyn wants to merge 5 commits into
docker:masterfrom
devvyn:devvynpm-volume-ro-support

Conversation

@devvyn

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Slight change to splitting of the volume argument, to align with Docker's handling of the equivalent argument.

@aanand

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks! Looks good.

  1. Could we get an integration test?
  2. The documentation for volumes needs updating.
  3. I'd rather split_volume always returned a tuple of the same length, with the last part always being either ro or rw.
  4. split_volume's docstring needs updating.
  5. Could you squash it into one commit?
  6. Commits need to be signed off.

@devvyn

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Ha ha, I would like to apologize: I meant to practice this on my fork
before submitting seriously, but I failed to notice whose repository I'd
applied the push to.

By the way, I think there is an issue on file (#260
#260) which applies and another issue
(#363#363) which touches on fully
supporting all Docker arguments, which would include volume permissions. If
I can manage to wrangle git to do this properly, I will try this again in
reference to one or both issues.

Thanks for your helpful response. This will certainly help me succeed in my
next attempted pull request.

Devvyn Murphy
OTV Technologies Ltd.
2915B Faithfull Ave
Saskatoon, SK S7K 8E8
otvtech.com
T:1 (306) 374-0607, 283

M:+13068802322

On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Aanand Prasad notifications@github.com
wrote:

Thanks! Looks good.

  1. Could we get an integration test?
  2. The documentation for volumes needs updating.
  3. I'd rather split_volume always returned a tuple of the same length,
    with the last part always being either ro or rw.
  4. split_volume's docstring needs updating.
  5. Could you squash it into one commit?
  6. Commits need to be signed off
    https://github.com/docker/fig/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#sign-your-work
    .

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#444 (comment).

@dnephin

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@devvynm if you're interested, I sent in a PR yesterday (#442) which adds this support along with additional validation and unit tests

@bfirshbfirsh closed this Sep 4, 2014
@devvyn

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@dnephin Very happy to hear that. Thanks for letting me know.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@devvyn@aanand@dnephin@bfirsh
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Devvynpm volume ro support by devvyn · Pull Request #444 · docker/compose · GitHub
Skip to content

Devvynpm volume ro support - #444

Closed
devvyn wants to merge 5 commits into
docker:masterfrom
devvyn:devvynpm-volume-ro-support
Closed

Devvynpm volume ro support#444
devvyn wants to merge 5 commits into
docker:masterfrom
devvyn:devvynpm-volume-ro-support

Conversation

@devvyn

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Slight change to splitting of the volume argument, to align with Docker's handling of the equivalent argument.

@aanand

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks! Looks good.

  1. Could we get an integration test?
  2. The documentation for volumes needs updating.
  3. I'd rather split_volume always returned a tuple of the same length, with the last part always being either ro or rw.
  4. split_volume's docstring needs updating.
  5. Could you squash it into one commit?
  6. Commits need to be signed off.

@devvyn

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Ha ha, I would like to apologize: I meant to practice this on my fork
before submitting seriously, but I failed to notice whose repository I'd
applied the push to.

By the way, I think there is an issue on file (#260
#260) which applies and another issue
(#363#363) which touches on fully
supporting all Docker arguments, which would include volume permissions. If
I can manage to wrangle git to do this properly, I will try this again in
reference to one or both issues.

Thanks for your helpful response. This will certainly help me succeed in my
next attempted pull request.

Devvyn Murphy
OTV Technologies Ltd.
2915B Faithfull Ave
Saskatoon, SK S7K 8E8
otvtech.com
T:1 (306) 374-0607, 283

M:+13068802322

On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Aanand Prasad notifications@github.com
wrote:

Thanks! Looks good.

  1. Could we get an integration test?
  2. The documentation for volumes needs updating.
  3. I'd rather split_volume always returned a tuple of the same length,
    with the last part always being either ro or rw.
  4. split_volume's docstring needs updating.
  5. Could you squash it into one commit?
  6. Commits need to be signed off
    https://github.com/docker/fig/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#sign-your-work
    .

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#444 (comment).

@dnephin

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@devvynm if you're interested, I sent in a PR yesterday (#442) which adds this support along with additional validation and unit tests

@bfirshbfirsh closed this Sep 4, 2014
@devvyn

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@dnephin Very happy to hear that. Thanks for letting me know.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@devvyn@aanand@dnephin@bfirsh
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' Devvynpm volume ro support by devvyn · Pull Request #444 · docker/compose · GitHub
Skip to content

Devvynpm volume ro support - #444

Closed
devvyn wants to merge 5 commits into
docker:masterfrom
devvyn:devvynpm-volume-ro-support
Closed

Devvynpm volume ro support#444
devvyn wants to merge 5 commits into
docker:masterfrom
devvyn:devvynpm-volume-ro-support

Conversation

@devvyn

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Slight change to splitting of the volume argument, to align with Docker's handling of the equivalent argument.

@aanand

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks! Looks good.

  1. Could we get an integration test?
  2. The documentation for volumes needs updating.
  3. I'd rather split_volume always returned a tuple of the same length, with the last part always being either ro or rw.
  4. split_volume's docstring needs updating.
  5. Could you squash it into one commit?
  6. Commits need to be signed off.

@devvyn

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Ha ha, I would like to apologize: I meant to practice this on my fork
before submitting seriously, but I failed to notice whose repository I'd
applied the push to.

By the way, I think there is an issue on file (#260
#260) which applies and another issue
(#363#363) which touches on fully
supporting all Docker arguments, which would include volume permissions. If
I can manage to wrangle git to do this properly, I will try this again in
reference to one or both issues.

Thanks for your helpful response. This will certainly help me succeed in my
next attempted pull request.

Devvyn Murphy
OTV Technologies Ltd.
2915B Faithfull Ave
Saskatoon, SK S7K 8E8
otvtech.com
T:1 (306) 374-0607, 283

M:+13068802322

On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Aanand Prasad notifications@github.com
wrote:

Thanks! Looks good.

  1. Could we get an integration test?
  2. The documentation for volumes needs updating.
  3. I'd rather split_volume always returned a tuple of the same length,
    with the last part always being either ro or rw.
  4. split_volume's docstring needs updating.
  5. Could you squash it into one commit?
  6. Commits need to be signed off
    https://github.com/docker/fig/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#sign-your-work
    .

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#444 (comment).

@dnephin

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@devvynm if you're interested, I sent in a PR yesterday (#442) which adds this support along with additional validation and unit tests

@bfirshbfirsh closed this Sep 4, 2014
@devvyn

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@dnephin Very happy to hear that. Thanks for letting me know.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@devvyn@aanand@dnephin@bfirsh
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Devvynpm volume ro support by devvyn · Pull Request #444 · docker/compose · GitHub
Skip to content

Devvynpm volume ro support - #444

Closed
devvyn wants to merge 5 commits into
docker:masterfrom
devvyn:devvynpm-volume-ro-support
Closed

Devvynpm volume ro support#444
devvyn wants to merge 5 commits into
docker:masterfrom
devvyn:devvynpm-volume-ro-support

Conversation

@devvyn

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Slight change to splitting of the volume argument, to align with Docker's handling of the equivalent argument.

@aanand

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks! Looks good.

  1. Could we get an integration test?
  2. The documentation for volumes needs updating.
  3. I'd rather split_volume always returned a tuple of the same length, with the last part always being either ro or rw.
  4. split_volume's docstring needs updating.
  5. Could you squash it into one commit?
  6. Commits need to be signed off.

@devvyn

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Ha ha, I would like to apologize: I meant to practice this on my fork
before submitting seriously, but I failed to notice whose repository I'd
applied the push to.

By the way, I think there is an issue on file (#260
#260) which applies and another issue
(#363#363) which touches on fully
supporting all Docker arguments, which would include volume permissions. If
I can manage to wrangle git to do this properly, I will try this again in
reference to one or both issues.

Thanks for your helpful response. This will certainly help me succeed in my
next attempted pull request.

Devvyn Murphy
OTV Technologies Ltd.
2915B Faithfull Ave
Saskatoon, SK S7K 8E8
otvtech.com
T:1 (306) 374-0607, 283

M:+13068802322

On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Aanand Prasad notifications@github.com
wrote:

Thanks! Looks good.

  1. Could we get an integration test?
  2. The documentation for volumes needs updating.
  3. I'd rather split_volume always returned a tuple of the same length,
    with the last part always being either ro or rw.
  4. split_volume's docstring needs updating.
  5. Could you squash it into one commit?
  6. Commits need to be signed off
    https://github.com/docker/fig/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#sign-your-work
    .

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#444 (comment).

@dnephin

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@devvynm if you're interested, I sent in a PR yesterday (#442) which adds this support along with additional validation and unit tests

@bfirshbfirsh closed this Sep 4, 2014
@devvyn

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@dnephin Very happy to hear that. Thanks for letting me know.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@devvyn@aanand@dnephin@bfirsh
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Devvynpm volume ro support by devvyn · Pull Request #444 · docker/compose · GitHub
Skip to content

Devvynpm volume ro support - #444

Closed
devvyn wants to merge 5 commits into
docker:masterfrom
devvyn:devvynpm-volume-ro-support
Closed

Devvynpm volume ro support#444
devvyn wants to merge 5 commits into
docker:masterfrom
devvyn:devvynpm-volume-ro-support

Conversation

@devvyn

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Slight change to splitting of the volume argument, to align with Docker's handling of the equivalent argument.

@aanand

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks! Looks good.

  1. Could we get an integration test?
  2. The documentation for volumes needs updating.
  3. I'd rather split_volume always returned a tuple of the same length, with the last part always being either ro or rw.
  4. split_volume's docstring needs updating.
  5. Could you squash it into one commit?
  6. Commits need to be signed off.

@devvyn

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Ha ha, I would like to apologize: I meant to practice this on my fork
before submitting seriously, but I failed to notice whose repository I'd
applied the push to.

By the way, I think there is an issue on file (#260
#260) which applies and another issue
(#363#363) which touches on fully
supporting all Docker arguments, which would include volume permissions. If
I can manage to wrangle git to do this properly, I will try this again in
reference to one or both issues.

Thanks for your helpful response. This will certainly help me succeed in my
next attempted pull request.

Devvyn Murphy
OTV Technologies Ltd.
2915B Faithfull Ave
Saskatoon, SK S7K 8E8
otvtech.com
T:1 (306) 374-0607, 283

M:+13068802322

On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Aanand Prasad notifications@github.com
wrote:

Thanks! Looks good.

  1. Could we get an integration test?
  2. The documentation for volumes needs updating.
  3. I'd rather split_volume always returned a tuple of the same length,
    with the last part always being either ro or rw.
  4. split_volume's docstring needs updating.
  5. Could you squash it into one commit?
  6. Commits need to be signed off
    https://github.com/docker/fig/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#sign-your-work
    .

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#444 (comment).

@dnephin

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@devvynm if you're interested, I sent in a PR yesterday (#442) which adds this support along with additional validation and unit tests

@bfirshbfirsh closed this Sep 4, 2014
@devvyn

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@dnephin Very happy to hear that. Thanks for letting me know.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@devvyn@aanand@dnephin@bfirsh
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); Devvynpm volume ro support by devvyn · Pull Request #444 · docker/compose · GitHub
Skip to content

Devvynpm volume ro support - #444

Closed
devvyn wants to merge 5 commits into
docker:masterfrom
devvyn:devvynpm-volume-ro-support
Closed

Devvynpm volume ro support#444
devvyn wants to merge 5 commits into
docker:masterfrom
devvyn:devvynpm-volume-ro-support

Conversation

@devvyn

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Slight change to splitting of the volume argument, to align with Docker's handling of the equivalent argument.

@aanand

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks! Looks good.

  1. Could we get an integration test?
  2. The documentation for volumes needs updating.
  3. I'd rather split_volume always returned a tuple of the same length, with the last part always being either ro or rw.
  4. split_volume's docstring needs updating.
  5. Could you squash it into one commit?
  6. Commits need to be signed off.

@devvyn

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Ha ha, I would like to apologize: I meant to practice this on my fork
before submitting seriously, but I failed to notice whose repository I'd
applied the push to.

By the way, I think there is an issue on file (#260
#260) which applies and another issue
(#363#363) which touches on fully
supporting all Docker arguments, which would include volume permissions. If
I can manage to wrangle git to do this properly, I will try this again in
reference to one or both issues.

Thanks for your helpful response. This will certainly help me succeed in my
next attempted pull request.

Devvyn Murphy
OTV Technologies Ltd.
2915B Faithfull Ave
Saskatoon, SK S7K 8E8
otvtech.com
T:1 (306) 374-0607, 283

M:+13068802322

On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Aanand Prasad notifications@github.com
wrote:

Thanks! Looks good.

  1. Could we get an integration test?
  2. The documentation for volumes needs updating.
  3. I'd rather split_volume always returned a tuple of the same length,
    with the last part always being either ro or rw.
  4. split_volume's docstring needs updating.
  5. Could you squash it into one commit?
  6. Commits need to be signed off
    https://github.com/docker/fig/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#sign-your-work
    .

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#444 (comment).

@dnephin

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@devvynm if you're interested, I sent in a PR yesterday (#442) which adds this support along with additional validation and unit tests

@bfirshbfirsh closed this Sep 4, 2014
@devvyn

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@dnephin Very happy to hear that. Thanks for letting me know.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@devvyn@aanand@dnephin@bfirsh