[release/10.0-preview6] JSON: Don't mark unmapped properties as read - #116828

Merged
jozkee merged 1 commit into
release/10.0-preview6from
backport/pr-116807-to-release/10.0-preview6
Jun 19, 2025
Merged

[release/10.0-preview6] JSON: Don't mark unmapped properties as read#116828
jozkee merged 1 commit into
release/10.0-preview6from
backport/pr-116807-to-release/10.0-preview6

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Jun 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #116807 to release/10.0-preview6

/cc @PranavSenthilnathan

Customer Impact

  • Customer reported
  • Found internally

Found in #116801 and blocking dotnet/aspnetcore#53467 / dotnet/aspnetcore#62112 (passkey support for ASP.NET). If a class with a constructor and/or required properties is being deserialized into and the JSON payload contains an unmapped property, then there will be a NullReferenceException. Here is the reported example:

usingSystem.Text.Json;usingSystem.Text.Json.Serialization;// Note the additional "Baz" propertyvarjson=""" { "Bar": "asdf", "Baz": "hello" } """;_=JsonSerializer.Deserialize(json,MyJsonSerializerContext.Default.Foo);// <-- NullReferenceException hereclassFoo{// Note the use of 'required' herepublicrequiredstring?Bar{get;set;}}[JsonSerializable(typeof(Foo))]partialclassMyJsonSerializerContext:JsonSerializerContext;

Regression

  • Yes
  • No

Yes, this was introduced as part a new feature but part of the changes in that PR regressed old behavior. Introduced in #115856.

During deserialization we keep track of the properties that are read in order to do duplicate detection and required property validation. When a parametrized constructor is specified for deserialization, there are four types of JSON properties:

  1. Properties that map to a constructor parameter
  2. Properties that don't map to a constructor parameter but still map to a property on the class
  3. Properties that map to the ExtensionData property
  4. Properties that are unmapped

(The last two cases are only differentiated by whether the class has a property with the ExtensionData attribute.)

#115856 added duplicate detection by keeping track of properties that were assigned. Paths to handle cases 1, 2 and 3 were added but case 4 was an edge case that was not considered. So when this case was hit we would try to find the mapping like we do for case 1 or 2 when we actually don't have one. This PR fixes this case by explicitly checking for it and skipping duplicate detection for it.

Testing

The example in the reported issue was added as a test case and now passes with the new fix. This tests both source generation and reflection modes. The reported issue is linked in the test case.

Risk

Low, the fix is essentially preventing a NullReferenceException by checking that the object is a valid to dereference.

@PranavSenthilnathan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/cc @joperezr@MackinnonBuck if you want to track this

@PranavSenthilnathanPranavSenthilnathan added Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review area-System.Text.Json labels Jun 19, 2025
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-text-json, @gregsdennis
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@artl93artl93 added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Jun 19, 2025
@PranavSenthilnathan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/ba-g Known test failures, unrelated to this PR. #116671 and #116558

@jozkee
jozkee removed the request for review from jeffhandleyJune 19, 2025 20:25
@jozkee
jozkee merged commit 3d44749 into release/10.0-preview6Jun 19, 2025
@ViktorHofer
ViktorHofer deleted the backport/pr-116807-to-release/10.0-preview6 branch June 19, 2025 23:19
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 20, 2025
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-System.Text.JsonServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@PranavSenthilnathan@eiriktsarpalis@artl93@jozkee
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

[release/10.0-preview6] JSON: Don't mark unmapped properties as read - #116828

Merged
jozkee merged 1 commit into
release/10.0-preview6from
backport/pr-116807-to-release/10.0-preview6
Jun 19, 2025
Merged

[release/10.0-preview6] JSON: Don't mark unmapped properties as read#116828
jozkee merged 1 commit into
release/10.0-preview6from
backport/pr-116807-to-release/10.0-preview6

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Jun 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #116807 to release/10.0-preview6

/cc @PranavSenthilnathan

Customer Impact

  • Customer reported
  • Found internally

Found in #116801 and blocking dotnet/aspnetcore#53467 / dotnet/aspnetcore#62112 (passkey support for ASP.NET). If a class with a constructor and/or required properties is being deserialized into and the JSON payload contains an unmapped property, then there will be a NullReferenceException. Here is the reported example:

usingSystem.Text.Json;usingSystem.Text.Json.Serialization;// Note the additional "Baz" propertyvarjson=""" { "Bar": "asdf", "Baz": "hello" } """;_=JsonSerializer.Deserialize(json,MyJsonSerializerContext.Default.Foo);// <-- NullReferenceException hereclassFoo{// Note the use of 'required' herepublicrequiredstring?Bar{get;set;}}[JsonSerializable(typeof(Foo))]partialclassMyJsonSerializerContext:JsonSerializerContext;

Regression

  • Yes
  • No

Yes, this was introduced as part a new feature but part of the changes in that PR regressed old behavior. Introduced in #115856.

During deserialization we keep track of the properties that are read in order to do duplicate detection and required property validation. When a parametrized constructor is specified for deserialization, there are four types of JSON properties:

  1. Properties that map to a constructor parameter
  2. Properties that don't map to a constructor parameter but still map to a property on the class
  3. Properties that map to the ExtensionData property
  4. Properties that are unmapped

(The last two cases are only differentiated by whether the class has a property with the ExtensionData attribute.)

#115856 added duplicate detection by keeping track of properties that were assigned. Paths to handle cases 1, 2 and 3 were added but case 4 was an edge case that was not considered. So when this case was hit we would try to find the mapping like we do for case 1 or 2 when we actually don't have one. This PR fixes this case by explicitly checking for it and skipping duplicate detection for it.

Testing

The example in the reported issue was added as a test case and now passes with the new fix. This tests both source generation and reflection modes. The reported issue is linked in the test case.

Risk

Low, the fix is essentially preventing a NullReferenceException by checking that the object is a valid to dereference.

@PranavSenthilnathan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/cc @joperezr@MackinnonBuck if you want to track this

@PranavSenthilnathanPranavSenthilnathan added Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review area-System.Text.Json labels Jun 19, 2025
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-text-json, @gregsdennis
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@artl93artl93 added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Jun 19, 2025
@PranavSenthilnathan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/ba-g Known test failures, unrelated to this PR. #116671 and #116558

@jozkee
jozkee removed the request for review from jeffhandleyJune 19, 2025 20:25
@jozkee
jozkee merged commit 3d44749 into release/10.0-preview6Jun 19, 2025
@ViktorHofer
ViktorHofer deleted the backport/pr-116807-to-release/10.0-preview6 branch June 19, 2025 23:19
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 20, 2025
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-System.Text.JsonServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@PranavSenthilnathan@eiriktsarpalis@artl93@jozkee
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[release/10.0-preview6] JSON: Don't mark unmapped properties as read - #116828

Merged
jozkee merged 1 commit into
release/10.0-preview6from
backport/pr-116807-to-release/10.0-preview6
Jun 19, 2025
Merged

[release/10.0-preview6] JSON: Don't mark unmapped properties as read#116828
jozkee merged 1 commit into
release/10.0-preview6from
backport/pr-116807-to-release/10.0-preview6

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Jun 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #116807 to release/10.0-preview6

/cc @PranavSenthilnathan

Customer Impact

  • Customer reported
  • Found internally

Found in #116801 and blocking dotnet/aspnetcore#53467 / dotnet/aspnetcore#62112 (passkey support for ASP.NET). If a class with a constructor and/or required properties is being deserialized into and the JSON payload contains an unmapped property, then there will be a NullReferenceException. Here is the reported example:

usingSystem.Text.Json;usingSystem.Text.Json.Serialization;// Note the additional "Baz" propertyvarjson=""" { "Bar": "asdf", "Baz": "hello" } """;_=JsonSerializer.Deserialize(json,MyJsonSerializerContext.Default.Foo);// <-- NullReferenceException hereclassFoo{// Note the use of 'required' herepublicrequiredstring?Bar{get;set;}}[JsonSerializable(typeof(Foo))]partialclassMyJsonSerializerContext:JsonSerializerContext;

Regression

  • Yes
  • No

Yes, this was introduced as part a new feature but part of the changes in that PR regressed old behavior. Introduced in #115856.

During deserialization we keep track of the properties that are read in order to do duplicate detection and required property validation. When a parametrized constructor is specified for deserialization, there are four types of JSON properties:

  1. Properties that map to a constructor parameter
  2. Properties that don't map to a constructor parameter but still map to a property on the class
  3. Properties that map to the ExtensionData property
  4. Properties that are unmapped

(The last two cases are only differentiated by whether the class has a property with the ExtensionData attribute.)

#115856 added duplicate detection by keeping track of properties that were assigned. Paths to handle cases 1, 2 and 3 were added but case 4 was an edge case that was not considered. So when this case was hit we would try to find the mapping like we do for case 1 or 2 when we actually don't have one. This PR fixes this case by explicitly checking for it and skipping duplicate detection for it.

Testing

The example in the reported issue was added as a test case and now passes with the new fix. This tests both source generation and reflection modes. The reported issue is linked in the test case.

Risk

Low, the fix is essentially preventing a NullReferenceException by checking that the object is a valid to dereference.

@PranavSenthilnathan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/cc @joperezr@MackinnonBuck if you want to track this

@PranavSenthilnathanPranavSenthilnathan added Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review area-System.Text.Json labels Jun 19, 2025
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-text-json, @gregsdennis
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@artl93artl93 added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Jun 19, 2025
@PranavSenthilnathan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/ba-g Known test failures, unrelated to this PR. #116671 and #116558

@jozkee
jozkee removed the request for review from jeffhandleyJune 19, 2025 20:25
@jozkee
jozkee merged commit 3d44749 into release/10.0-preview6Jun 19, 2025
@ViktorHofer
ViktorHofer deleted the backport/pr-116807-to-release/10.0-preview6 branch June 19, 2025 23:19
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 20, 2025
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-System.Text.JsonServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@PranavSenthilnathan@eiriktsarpalis@artl93@jozkee
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[release/10.0-preview6] JSON: Don't mark unmapped properties as read - #116828

Merged
jozkee merged 1 commit into
release/10.0-preview6from
backport/pr-116807-to-release/10.0-preview6
Jun 19, 2025
Merged

[release/10.0-preview6] JSON: Don't mark unmapped properties as read#116828
jozkee merged 1 commit into
release/10.0-preview6from
backport/pr-116807-to-release/10.0-preview6

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Jun 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #116807 to release/10.0-preview6

/cc @PranavSenthilnathan

Customer Impact

  • Customer reported
  • Found internally

Found in #116801 and blocking dotnet/aspnetcore#53467 / dotnet/aspnetcore#62112 (passkey support for ASP.NET). If a class with a constructor and/or required properties is being deserialized into and the JSON payload contains an unmapped property, then there will be a NullReferenceException. Here is the reported example:

usingSystem.Text.Json;usingSystem.Text.Json.Serialization;// Note the additional "Baz" propertyvarjson=""" { "Bar": "asdf", "Baz": "hello" } """;_=JsonSerializer.Deserialize(json,MyJsonSerializerContext.Default.Foo);// <-- NullReferenceException hereclassFoo{// Note the use of 'required' herepublicrequiredstring?Bar{get;set;}}[JsonSerializable(typeof(Foo))]partialclassMyJsonSerializerContext:JsonSerializerContext;

Regression

  • Yes
  • No

Yes, this was introduced as part a new feature but part of the changes in that PR regressed old behavior. Introduced in #115856.

During deserialization we keep track of the properties that are read in order to do duplicate detection and required property validation. When a parametrized constructor is specified for deserialization, there are four types of JSON properties:

  1. Properties that map to a constructor parameter
  2. Properties that don't map to a constructor parameter but still map to a property on the class
  3. Properties that map to the ExtensionData property
  4. Properties that are unmapped

(The last two cases are only differentiated by whether the class has a property with the ExtensionData attribute.)

#115856 added duplicate detection by keeping track of properties that were assigned. Paths to handle cases 1, 2 and 3 were added but case 4 was an edge case that was not considered. So when this case was hit we would try to find the mapping like we do for case 1 or 2 when we actually don't have one. This PR fixes this case by explicitly checking for it and skipping duplicate detection for it.

Testing

The example in the reported issue was added as a test case and now passes with the new fix. This tests both source generation and reflection modes. The reported issue is linked in the test case.

Risk

Low, the fix is essentially preventing a NullReferenceException by checking that the object is a valid to dereference.

@PranavSenthilnathan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/cc @joperezr@MackinnonBuck if you want to track this

@PranavSenthilnathanPranavSenthilnathan added Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review area-System.Text.Json labels Jun 19, 2025
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-text-json, @gregsdennis
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@artl93artl93 added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Jun 19, 2025
@PranavSenthilnathan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/ba-g Known test failures, unrelated to this PR. #116671 and #116558

@jozkee
jozkee removed the request for review from jeffhandleyJune 19, 2025 20:25
@jozkee
jozkee merged commit 3d44749 into release/10.0-preview6Jun 19, 2025
@ViktorHofer
ViktorHofer deleted the backport/pr-116807-to-release/10.0-preview6 branch June 19, 2025 23:19
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 20, 2025
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-System.Text.JsonServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@PranavSenthilnathan@eiriktsarpalis@artl93@jozkee
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

[release/10.0-preview6] JSON: Don't mark unmapped properties as read - #116828

Merged
jozkee merged 1 commit into
release/10.0-preview6from
backport/pr-116807-to-release/10.0-preview6
Jun 19, 2025
Merged

[release/10.0-preview6] JSON: Don't mark unmapped properties as read#116828
jozkee merged 1 commit into
release/10.0-preview6from
backport/pr-116807-to-release/10.0-preview6

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Jun 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #116807 to release/10.0-preview6

/cc @PranavSenthilnathan

Customer Impact

  • Customer reported
  • Found internally

Found in #116801 and blocking dotnet/aspnetcore#53467 / dotnet/aspnetcore#62112 (passkey support for ASP.NET). If a class with a constructor and/or required properties is being deserialized into and the JSON payload contains an unmapped property, then there will be a NullReferenceException. Here is the reported example:

usingSystem.Text.Json;usingSystem.Text.Json.Serialization;// Note the additional "Baz" propertyvarjson=""" { "Bar": "asdf", "Baz": "hello" } """;_=JsonSerializer.Deserialize(json,MyJsonSerializerContext.Default.Foo);// <-- NullReferenceException hereclassFoo{// Note the use of 'required' herepublicrequiredstring?Bar{get;set;}}[JsonSerializable(typeof(Foo))]partialclassMyJsonSerializerContext:JsonSerializerContext;

Regression

  • Yes
  • No

Yes, this was introduced as part a new feature but part of the changes in that PR regressed old behavior. Introduced in #115856.

During deserialization we keep track of the properties that are read in order to do duplicate detection and required property validation. When a parametrized constructor is specified for deserialization, there are four types of JSON properties:

  1. Properties that map to a constructor parameter
  2. Properties that don't map to a constructor parameter but still map to a property on the class
  3. Properties that map to the ExtensionData property
  4. Properties that are unmapped

(The last two cases are only differentiated by whether the class has a property with the ExtensionData attribute.)

#115856 added duplicate detection by keeping track of properties that were assigned. Paths to handle cases 1, 2 and 3 were added but case 4 was an edge case that was not considered. So when this case was hit we would try to find the mapping like we do for case 1 or 2 when we actually don't have one. This PR fixes this case by explicitly checking for it and skipping duplicate detection for it.

Testing

The example in the reported issue was added as a test case and now passes with the new fix. This tests both source generation and reflection modes. The reported issue is linked in the test case.

Risk

Low, the fix is essentially preventing a NullReferenceException by checking that the object is a valid to dereference.

@PranavSenthilnathan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/cc @joperezr@MackinnonBuck if you want to track this

@PranavSenthilnathanPranavSenthilnathan added Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review area-System.Text.Json labels Jun 19, 2025
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-text-json, @gregsdennis
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@artl93artl93 added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Jun 19, 2025
@PranavSenthilnathan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/ba-g Known test failures, unrelated to this PR. #116671 and #116558

@jozkee
jozkee removed the request for review from jeffhandleyJune 19, 2025 20:25
@jozkee
jozkee merged commit 3d44749 into release/10.0-preview6Jun 19, 2025
@ViktorHofer
ViktorHofer deleted the backport/pr-116807-to-release/10.0-preview6 branch June 19, 2025 23:19
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 20, 2025
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-System.Text.JsonServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@PranavSenthilnathan@eiriktsarpalis@artl93@jozkee
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[release/10.0-preview6] JSON: Don't mark unmapped properties as read - #116828

Merged
jozkee merged 1 commit into
release/10.0-preview6from
backport/pr-116807-to-release/10.0-preview6
Jun 19, 2025
Merged

[release/10.0-preview6] JSON: Don't mark unmapped properties as read#116828
jozkee merged 1 commit into
release/10.0-preview6from
backport/pr-116807-to-release/10.0-preview6

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Jun 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #116807 to release/10.0-preview6

/cc @PranavSenthilnathan

Customer Impact

  • Customer reported
  • Found internally

Found in #116801 and blocking dotnet/aspnetcore#53467 / dotnet/aspnetcore#62112 (passkey support for ASP.NET). If a class with a constructor and/or required properties is being deserialized into and the JSON payload contains an unmapped property, then there will be a NullReferenceException. Here is the reported example:

usingSystem.Text.Json;usingSystem.Text.Json.Serialization;// Note the additional "Baz" propertyvarjson=""" { "Bar": "asdf", "Baz": "hello" } """;_=JsonSerializer.Deserialize(json,MyJsonSerializerContext.Default.Foo);// <-- NullReferenceException hereclassFoo{// Note the use of 'required' herepublicrequiredstring?Bar{get;set;}}[JsonSerializable(typeof(Foo))]partialclassMyJsonSerializerContext:JsonSerializerContext;

Regression

  • Yes
  • No

Yes, this was introduced as part a new feature but part of the changes in that PR regressed old behavior. Introduced in #115856.

During deserialization we keep track of the properties that are read in order to do duplicate detection and required property validation. When a parametrized constructor is specified for deserialization, there are four types of JSON properties:

  1. Properties that map to a constructor parameter
  2. Properties that don't map to a constructor parameter but still map to a property on the class
  3. Properties that map to the ExtensionData property
  4. Properties that are unmapped

(The last two cases are only differentiated by whether the class has a property with the ExtensionData attribute.)

#115856 added duplicate detection by keeping track of properties that were assigned. Paths to handle cases 1, 2 and 3 were added but case 4 was an edge case that was not considered. So when this case was hit we would try to find the mapping like we do for case 1 or 2 when we actually don't have one. This PR fixes this case by explicitly checking for it and skipping duplicate detection for it.

Testing

The example in the reported issue was added as a test case and now passes with the new fix. This tests both source generation and reflection modes. The reported issue is linked in the test case.

Risk

Low, the fix is essentially preventing a NullReferenceException by checking that the object is a valid to dereference.

@PranavSenthilnathan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/cc @joperezr@MackinnonBuck if you want to track this

@PranavSenthilnathanPranavSenthilnathan added Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review area-System.Text.Json labels Jun 19, 2025
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-text-json, @gregsdennis
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@artl93artl93 added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Jun 19, 2025
@PranavSenthilnathan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/ba-g Known test failures, unrelated to this PR. #116671 and #116558

@jozkee
jozkee removed the request for review from jeffhandleyJune 19, 2025 20:25
@jozkee
jozkee merged commit 3d44749 into release/10.0-preview6Jun 19, 2025
@ViktorHofer
ViktorHofer deleted the backport/pr-116807-to-release/10.0-preview6 branch June 19, 2025 23:19
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 20, 2025
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-System.Text.JsonServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@PranavSenthilnathan@eiriktsarpalis@artl93@jozkee
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[release/10.0-preview6] JSON: Don't mark unmapped properties as read - #116828

Merged
jozkee merged 1 commit into
release/10.0-preview6from
backport/pr-116807-to-release/10.0-preview6
Jun 19, 2025
Merged

[release/10.0-preview6] JSON: Don't mark unmapped properties as read#116828
jozkee merged 1 commit into
release/10.0-preview6from
backport/pr-116807-to-release/10.0-preview6

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Jun 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #116807 to release/10.0-preview6

/cc @PranavSenthilnathan

Customer Impact

  • Customer reported
  • Found internally

Found in #116801 and blocking dotnet/aspnetcore#53467 / dotnet/aspnetcore#62112 (passkey support for ASP.NET). If a class with a constructor and/or required properties is being deserialized into and the JSON payload contains an unmapped property, then there will be a NullReferenceException. Here is the reported example:

usingSystem.Text.Json;usingSystem.Text.Json.Serialization;// Note the additional "Baz" propertyvarjson=""" { "Bar": "asdf", "Baz": "hello" } """;_=JsonSerializer.Deserialize(json,MyJsonSerializerContext.Default.Foo);// <-- NullReferenceException hereclassFoo{// Note the use of 'required' herepublicrequiredstring?Bar{get;set;}}[JsonSerializable(typeof(Foo))]partialclassMyJsonSerializerContext:JsonSerializerContext;

Regression

  • Yes
  • No

Yes, this was introduced as part a new feature but part of the changes in that PR regressed old behavior. Introduced in #115856.

During deserialization we keep track of the properties that are read in order to do duplicate detection and required property validation. When a parametrized constructor is specified for deserialization, there are four types of JSON properties:

  1. Properties that map to a constructor parameter
  2. Properties that don't map to a constructor parameter but still map to a property on the class
  3. Properties that map to the ExtensionData property
  4. Properties that are unmapped

(The last two cases are only differentiated by whether the class has a property with the ExtensionData attribute.)

#115856 added duplicate detection by keeping track of properties that were assigned. Paths to handle cases 1, 2 and 3 were added but case 4 was an edge case that was not considered. So when this case was hit we would try to find the mapping like we do for case 1 or 2 when we actually don't have one. This PR fixes this case by explicitly checking for it and skipping duplicate detection for it.

Testing

The example in the reported issue was added as a test case and now passes with the new fix. This tests both source generation and reflection modes. The reported issue is linked in the test case.

Risk

Low, the fix is essentially preventing a NullReferenceException by checking that the object is a valid to dereference.

@PranavSenthilnathan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/cc @joperezr@MackinnonBuck if you want to track this

@PranavSenthilnathanPranavSenthilnathan added Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review area-System.Text.Json labels Jun 19, 2025
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-text-json, @gregsdennis
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@artl93artl93 added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Jun 19, 2025
@PranavSenthilnathan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/ba-g Known test failures, unrelated to this PR. #116671 and #116558

@jozkee
jozkee removed the request for review from jeffhandleyJune 19, 2025 20:25
@jozkee
jozkee merged commit 3d44749 into release/10.0-preview6Jun 19, 2025
@ViktorHofer
ViktorHofer deleted the backport/pr-116807-to-release/10.0-preview6 branch June 19, 2025 23:19
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 20, 2025
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-System.Text.JsonServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@PranavSenthilnathan@eiriktsarpalis@artl93@jozkee
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

[release/10.0-preview6] JSON: Don't mark unmapped properties as read - #116828

Merged
jozkee merged 1 commit into
release/10.0-preview6from
backport/pr-116807-to-release/10.0-preview6
Jun 19, 2025
Merged

[release/10.0-preview6] JSON: Don't mark unmapped properties as read#116828
jozkee merged 1 commit into
release/10.0-preview6from
backport/pr-116807-to-release/10.0-preview6

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Jun 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #116807 to release/10.0-preview6

/cc @PranavSenthilnathan

Customer Impact

  • Customer reported
  • Found internally

Found in #116801 and blocking dotnet/aspnetcore#53467 / dotnet/aspnetcore#62112 (passkey support for ASP.NET). If a class with a constructor and/or required properties is being deserialized into and the JSON payload contains an unmapped property, then there will be a NullReferenceException. Here is the reported example:

usingSystem.Text.Json;usingSystem.Text.Json.Serialization;// Note the additional "Baz" propertyvarjson=""" { "Bar": "asdf", "Baz": "hello" } """;_=JsonSerializer.Deserialize(json,MyJsonSerializerContext.Default.Foo);// <-- NullReferenceException hereclassFoo{// Note the use of 'required' herepublicrequiredstring?Bar{get;set;}}[JsonSerializable(typeof(Foo))]partialclassMyJsonSerializerContext:JsonSerializerContext;

Regression

  • Yes
  • No

Yes, this was introduced as part a new feature but part of the changes in that PR regressed old behavior. Introduced in #115856.

During deserialization we keep track of the properties that are read in order to do duplicate detection and required property validation. When a parametrized constructor is specified for deserialization, there are four types of JSON properties:

  1. Properties that map to a constructor parameter
  2. Properties that don't map to a constructor parameter but still map to a property on the class
  3. Properties that map to the ExtensionData property
  4. Properties that are unmapped

(The last two cases are only differentiated by whether the class has a property with the ExtensionData attribute.)

#115856 added duplicate detection by keeping track of properties that were assigned. Paths to handle cases 1, 2 and 3 were added but case 4 was an edge case that was not considered. So when this case was hit we would try to find the mapping like we do for case 1 or 2 when we actually don't have one. This PR fixes this case by explicitly checking for it and skipping duplicate detection for it.

Testing

The example in the reported issue was added as a test case and now passes with the new fix. This tests both source generation and reflection modes. The reported issue is linked in the test case.

Risk

Low, the fix is essentially preventing a NullReferenceException by checking that the object is a valid to dereference.

@PranavSenthilnathan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/cc @joperezr@MackinnonBuck if you want to track this

@PranavSenthilnathanPranavSenthilnathan added Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review area-System.Text.Json labels Jun 19, 2025
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-text-json, @gregsdennis
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@artl93artl93 added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Jun 19, 2025
@PranavSenthilnathan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/ba-g Known test failures, unrelated to this PR. #116671 and #116558

@jozkee
jozkee removed the request for review from jeffhandleyJune 19, 2025 20:25
@jozkee
jozkee merged commit 3d44749 into release/10.0-preview6Jun 19, 2025
@ViktorHofer
ViktorHofer deleted the backport/pr-116807-to-release/10.0-preview6 branch June 19, 2025 23:19
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 20, 2025
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-System.Text.JsonServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@PranavSenthilnathan@eiriktsarpalis@artl93@jozkee