Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
[hot_reload] Add instance fields - #76462
Merged
Merged
Conversation
lambdageekforce-pushed
the
hot-reload-add-innstance
branch
from
October 4, 2022 20:15
0a73fe5 to
0da7ebfComparelambdageek
marked this pull request as ready for review
October 4, 2022 20:24
lambdageek
requested review from
BrzVlad, marek-safar, thaystg and vargaz
as code ownersOctober 4, 2022 20:24
lambdageek
commented
Oct 4, 2022
MemberAuthor
lambdageek
commented
Oct 4, 2022
MemberAuthor
(Some of the code is part of #76618 ) |
lambdageek
commented
Oct 4, 2022
MemberAuthor
/azp run runtime-wasm |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
BrzVlad
reviewed
Oct 5, 2022
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
lambdageekforce-pushed
the
hot-reload-add-innstance
branch
from
October 5, 2022 19:17
ca44d25 to
c0fba82Comparelambdageek
commented
Oct 5, 2022
MemberAuthor
Found a few more items that need work before this is ready; updated the PR description |
lambdageek
commented
Oct 5, 2022
MemberAuthor
Interesting. CoreCLR is crashing on something that I'm doing in the |
lambdageek
commented
Oct 6, 2022
MemberAuthor
CoreCLR failure is #76702 |
lambdageekforce-pushed
the
hot-reload-add-innstance
branch
from
October 25, 2022 19:58
17a3e9e to
c933746Compare2 tasks
lambdageekforce-pushed
the
hot-reload-add-innstance
branch
from
November 10, 2022 21:08
c933746 to
616033bCompare
This was referenced Nov 11, 2022
…o_get_property_info
lambdageekforce-pushed
the
hot-reload-add-innstance
branch
from
November 15, 2022 23:47
139dfd1 to
517978eCompareNote: we're not doing anything with the new PropertyMap row Note2: we get MethodSemantics rows for properties that got updated, and we're currently ignoring them. Need to check that this is reasonable. (A test would be to use reflection to grab a getter or setter whose method body was changed and then try and invoke it and verify that we're calling the correct method.)
lambdageekforce-pushed
the
hot-reload-add-innstance
branch
from
November 18, 2022 19:22
78dedf7 to
2934993CompareMemberAuthor
@thaystg@fanyang-mono This PR is ready. Could you please take another look. |
thaystg
reviewed
Nov 21, 2022
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
thaystg
approved these changes
Nov 21, 2022
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes#63643
Remaining work:
ves_icall_property_info_get_default_valueworks with added propsmono_class_get_field_tokenmono_class_get_event_tokenmono_class_get_property_tokenmono_field_get_rvainit_weak_fields_innerves_icall_RuntimeFieldInfo_GetFieldOffsetves_icall_System_RuntimeFieldHandle_GetValueDirect/SetValueDirectmono_handle_unsafe_field_addrmono_metadata_field_info_fullmono_metadata_get_marshal_info, possibly