Emit armv8.4 ldapur* for volatile loads with contained offsets - #89681

Merged
EgorBo merged 22 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
EgorBo:stlur
Aug 31, 2023
Merged

Emit armv8.4 ldapur* for volatile loads with contained offsets#89681
EgorBo merged 22 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
EgorBo:stlur

Conversation

@EgorBo

@EgorBoEgorBo commented Jul 29, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Contributes to #64457

volatileinta;volatileintb;volatileintc;volatileintd;[Benchmark]publicintTest(){returna+b+c+d;}

Current codegen for Test:

; Assembly listing for method P:Test():int:this (Tier1)  stp fp, lr,[sp, #-0x10]! mov fp,spadd x1, x0, #8 ldapr w1,[x1]add x2, x0, #12 ldapr w2,[x2]add w1, w1, w2 add x2, x0, #16 ldapr w2,[x2]add w1, w1, w2 add x0, x0, #20 ldapr w0,[x0]add w0, w1, w0  ldp fp, lr,[sp], #0x10ret lr ; Total bytes of code 60

New codegen for Test:

; Assembly listing for method P:Test():int:this (Tier1) stp fp, lr,[sp, #-0x10]!mov fp,sp ldapur w1,[x0, #0x08] ldapur w2,[x0, #0x0C]add w1, w1, w2 ldapur w2,[x0, #0x10]add w1, w1, w2 ldapur w0,[x0, #0x14]add w0, w1, w0 ldp fp, lr,[sp], #0x10ret lr; Total bytes of code 44

Apple M2 Max:

MethodJobToolchainMeanErrorStdDevRatio
TestJob-LOXHRO/Core_Root_PR/corerun0.4724 ns0.0050 ns0.0045 ns0.89
TestJob-MPJUHL/Core_Root_main/corerun0.5327 ns0.0063 ns0.0059 ns1.00

Perf difference is not super exciting but it is what it is 🙂

@ghostghost added the area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI label Jul 29, 2023
@ghostghost assigned EgorBoJul 29, 2023
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details
volatileinta;volatileintb;volatileintc;volatileintd;[Benchmark]publicintTest(){returna+b+c+d;}

Current codegen for Test:

; Assembly listing for method P:Test():int:this (Tier1)  stp fp, lr,[sp, #-0x10]! mov fp,spadd x1, x0, #8 ldapr w1,[x1]add x2, x0, #12 ldapr w2,[x2]add w1, w1, w2 add x2, x0, #16 ldapr w2,[x2]add w1, w1, w2 add x0, x0, #20 ldapr w0,[x0]add w0, w1, w0  ldp fp, lr,[sp], #0x10ret lr ; Total bytes of code 60

New codegen for Test:

; Assembly listing for method P:Test():int:this (Tier1) stp fp, lr,[sp, #-0x10]!mov fp,sp ldapur w1,[x0, #0x08] ldapur w2,[x0, #0x0C]add w1, w1, w2 ldapur w2,[x0, #0x10]add w1, w1, w2 ldapur w0,[x0, #0x14]add w0, w1, w0 ldp fp, lr,[sp], #0x10ret lr; Total bytes of code 44
MethodJobToolchainMeanErrorStdDevRatio
TestJob-LOXHRO/Core_Root_PR/corerun0.4724 ns0.0050 ns0.0045 ns0.89
TestJob-MPJUHL/Core_Root_main/corerun0.5327 ns0.0063 ns0.0059 ns1.00

Perf difference is not super exciting but it is what it is 🙂

Author:EgorBo
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-CodeGen-coreclr

Milestone:-

static_assert_no_msg(INS_count <= 512);
instruction _idIns : 9;
static_assert_no_msg(INS_count <= 1024);
instruction _idIns : 10;

@EgorBoEgorBoJul 29, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I added a bit here since we now have more than 512 instructions (and that for sure will be increasing in future) but I also removed an used (on arm) _idCallRegPtr bit so the total size of the struct remains the same - 16b

@EgorBo
EgorBo marked this pull request as ready for review July 30, 2023 17:46
@EgorBoEgorBo added this to the 9.0.0 milestone Aug 5, 2023
@EgorBo
EgorBo marked this pull request as draft August 21, 2023 11:44
@EgorBo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@TIHan @dotnet/jit-contrib PTAL, simple change, emits ldapur where we previously emitted ldapr+add because ldapr doesn't support IMM offsets

@EgorBo
EgorBo requested a review from TIHanAugust 27, 2023 12:55
{
/* This is an indirect call (either a virtual call or func ptr call) */

id->idSetIsCallRegPtr();

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why was this removed for arm32?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I mentioned it in https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/pull/89681/files#r1278410873 comment, basically, it sets a bit that is unused for arm, so I removed that bit because I needed to extend _idIns's width

@TIHanTIHan left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, only one comment on the idSetIsCallingRegPtr.

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@EgorBo@TIHan@neon-sunset
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Emit armv8.4 ldapur* for volatile loads with contained offsets - #89681

Merged
EgorBo merged 22 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
EgorBo:stlur
Aug 31, 2023
Merged

Emit armv8.4 ldapur* for volatile loads with contained offsets#89681
EgorBo merged 22 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
EgorBo:stlur

Conversation

@EgorBo

@EgorBoEgorBo commented Jul 29, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Contributes to #64457

volatileinta;volatileintb;volatileintc;volatileintd;[Benchmark]publicintTest(){returna+b+c+d;}

Current codegen for Test:

; Assembly listing for method P:Test():int:this (Tier1)  stp fp, lr,[sp, #-0x10]! mov fp,spadd x1, x0, #8 ldapr w1,[x1]add x2, x0, #12 ldapr w2,[x2]add w1, w1, w2 add x2, x0, #16 ldapr w2,[x2]add w1, w1, w2 add x0, x0, #20 ldapr w0,[x0]add w0, w1, w0  ldp fp, lr,[sp], #0x10ret lr ; Total bytes of code 60

New codegen for Test:

; Assembly listing for method P:Test():int:this (Tier1) stp fp, lr,[sp, #-0x10]!mov fp,sp ldapur w1,[x0, #0x08] ldapur w2,[x0, #0x0C]add w1, w1, w2 ldapur w2,[x0, #0x10]add w1, w1, w2 ldapur w0,[x0, #0x14]add w0, w1, w0 ldp fp, lr,[sp], #0x10ret lr; Total bytes of code 44

Apple M2 Max:

MethodJobToolchainMeanErrorStdDevRatio
TestJob-LOXHRO/Core_Root_PR/corerun0.4724 ns0.0050 ns0.0045 ns0.89
TestJob-MPJUHL/Core_Root_main/corerun0.5327 ns0.0063 ns0.0059 ns1.00

Perf difference is not super exciting but it is what it is 🙂

@ghostghost added the area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI label Jul 29, 2023
@ghostghost assigned EgorBoJul 29, 2023
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details
volatileinta;volatileintb;volatileintc;volatileintd;[Benchmark]publicintTest(){returna+b+c+d;}

Current codegen for Test:

; Assembly listing for method P:Test():int:this (Tier1)  stp fp, lr,[sp, #-0x10]! mov fp,spadd x1, x0, #8 ldapr w1,[x1]add x2, x0, #12 ldapr w2,[x2]add w1, w1, w2 add x2, x0, #16 ldapr w2,[x2]add w1, w1, w2 add x0, x0, #20 ldapr w0,[x0]add w0, w1, w0  ldp fp, lr,[sp], #0x10ret lr ; Total bytes of code 60

New codegen for Test:

; Assembly listing for method P:Test():int:this (Tier1) stp fp, lr,[sp, #-0x10]!mov fp,sp ldapur w1,[x0, #0x08] ldapur w2,[x0, #0x0C]add w1, w1, w2 ldapur w2,[x0, #0x10]add w1, w1, w2 ldapur w0,[x0, #0x14]add w0, w1, w0 ldp fp, lr,[sp], #0x10ret lr; Total bytes of code 44
MethodJobToolchainMeanErrorStdDevRatio
TestJob-LOXHRO/Core_Root_PR/corerun0.4724 ns0.0050 ns0.0045 ns0.89
TestJob-MPJUHL/Core_Root_main/corerun0.5327 ns0.0063 ns0.0059 ns1.00

Perf difference is not super exciting but it is what it is 🙂

Author:EgorBo
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-CodeGen-coreclr

Milestone:-

static_assert_no_msg(INS_count <= 512);
instruction _idIns : 9;
static_assert_no_msg(INS_count <= 1024);
instruction _idIns : 10;

@EgorBoEgorBoJul 29, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I added a bit here since we now have more than 512 instructions (and that for sure will be increasing in future) but I also removed an used (on arm) _idCallRegPtr bit so the total size of the struct remains the same - 16b

@EgorBo
EgorBo marked this pull request as ready for review July 30, 2023 17:46
@EgorBoEgorBo added this to the 9.0.0 milestone Aug 5, 2023
@EgorBo
EgorBo marked this pull request as draft August 21, 2023 11:44
@EgorBo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@TIHan @dotnet/jit-contrib PTAL, simple change, emits ldapur where we previously emitted ldapr+add because ldapr doesn't support IMM offsets

@EgorBo
EgorBo requested a review from TIHanAugust 27, 2023 12:55
{
/* This is an indirect call (either a virtual call or func ptr call) */

id->idSetIsCallRegPtr();

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why was this removed for arm32?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I mentioned it in https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/pull/89681/files#r1278410873 comment, basically, it sets a bit that is unused for arm, so I removed that bit because I needed to extend _idIns's width

@TIHanTIHan left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, only one comment on the idSetIsCallingRegPtr.

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@EgorBo@TIHan@neon-sunset
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Emit armv8.4 ldapur* for volatile loads with contained offsets - #89681

Merged
EgorBo merged 22 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
EgorBo:stlur
Aug 31, 2023
Merged

Emit armv8.4 ldapur* for volatile loads with contained offsets#89681
EgorBo merged 22 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
EgorBo:stlur

Conversation

@EgorBo

@EgorBoEgorBo commented Jul 29, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Contributes to #64457

volatileinta;volatileintb;volatileintc;volatileintd;[Benchmark]publicintTest(){returna+b+c+d;}

Current codegen for Test:

; Assembly listing for method P:Test():int:this (Tier1)  stp fp, lr,[sp, #-0x10]! mov fp,spadd x1, x0, #8 ldapr w1,[x1]add x2, x0, #12 ldapr w2,[x2]add w1, w1, w2 add x2, x0, #16 ldapr w2,[x2]add w1, w1, w2 add x0, x0, #20 ldapr w0,[x0]add w0, w1, w0  ldp fp, lr,[sp], #0x10ret lr ; Total bytes of code 60

New codegen for Test:

; Assembly listing for method P:Test():int:this (Tier1) stp fp, lr,[sp, #-0x10]!mov fp,sp ldapur w1,[x0, #0x08] ldapur w2,[x0, #0x0C]add w1, w1, w2 ldapur w2,[x0, #0x10]add w1, w1, w2 ldapur w0,[x0, #0x14]add w0, w1, w0 ldp fp, lr,[sp], #0x10ret lr; Total bytes of code 44

Apple M2 Max:

MethodJobToolchainMeanErrorStdDevRatio
TestJob-LOXHRO/Core_Root_PR/corerun0.4724 ns0.0050 ns0.0045 ns0.89
TestJob-MPJUHL/Core_Root_main/corerun0.5327 ns0.0063 ns0.0059 ns1.00

Perf difference is not super exciting but it is what it is 🙂

@ghostghost added the area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI label Jul 29, 2023
@ghostghost assigned EgorBoJul 29, 2023
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details
volatileinta;volatileintb;volatileintc;volatileintd;[Benchmark]publicintTest(){returna+b+c+d;}

Current codegen for Test:

; Assembly listing for method P:Test():int:this (Tier1)  stp fp, lr,[sp, #-0x10]! mov fp,spadd x1, x0, #8 ldapr w1,[x1]add x2, x0, #12 ldapr w2,[x2]add w1, w1, w2 add x2, x0, #16 ldapr w2,[x2]add w1, w1, w2 add x0, x0, #20 ldapr w0,[x0]add w0, w1, w0  ldp fp, lr,[sp], #0x10ret lr ; Total bytes of code 60

New codegen for Test:

; Assembly listing for method P:Test():int:this (Tier1) stp fp, lr,[sp, #-0x10]!mov fp,sp ldapur w1,[x0, #0x08] ldapur w2,[x0, #0x0C]add w1, w1, w2 ldapur w2,[x0, #0x10]add w1, w1, w2 ldapur w0,[x0, #0x14]add w0, w1, w0 ldp fp, lr,[sp], #0x10ret lr; Total bytes of code 44
MethodJobToolchainMeanErrorStdDevRatio
TestJob-LOXHRO/Core_Root_PR/corerun0.4724 ns0.0050 ns0.0045 ns0.89
TestJob-MPJUHL/Core_Root_main/corerun0.5327 ns0.0063 ns0.0059 ns1.00

Perf difference is not super exciting but it is what it is 🙂

Author:EgorBo
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-CodeGen-coreclr

Milestone:-

static_assert_no_msg(INS_count <= 512);
instruction _idIns : 9;
static_assert_no_msg(INS_count <= 1024);
instruction _idIns : 10;

@EgorBoEgorBoJul 29, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I added a bit here since we now have more than 512 instructions (and that for sure will be increasing in future) but I also removed an used (on arm) _idCallRegPtr bit so the total size of the struct remains the same - 16b

@EgorBo
EgorBo marked this pull request as ready for review July 30, 2023 17:46
@EgorBoEgorBo added this to the 9.0.0 milestone Aug 5, 2023
@EgorBo
EgorBo marked this pull request as draft August 21, 2023 11:44
@EgorBo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@TIHan @dotnet/jit-contrib PTAL, simple change, emits ldapur where we previously emitted ldapr+add because ldapr doesn't support IMM offsets

@EgorBo
EgorBo requested a review from TIHanAugust 27, 2023 12:55
{
/* This is an indirect call (either a virtual call or func ptr call) */

id->idSetIsCallRegPtr();

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why was this removed for arm32?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I mentioned it in https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/pull/89681/files#r1278410873 comment, basically, it sets a bit that is unused for arm, so I removed that bit because I needed to extend _idIns's width

@TIHanTIHan left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, only one comment on the idSetIsCallingRegPtr.

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@EgorBo@TIHan@neon-sunset
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Emit armv8.4 ldapur* for volatile loads with contained offsets - #89681

Merged
EgorBo merged 22 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
EgorBo:stlur
Aug 31, 2023
Merged

Emit armv8.4 ldapur* for volatile loads with contained offsets#89681
EgorBo merged 22 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
EgorBo:stlur

Conversation

@EgorBo

@EgorBoEgorBo commented Jul 29, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Contributes to #64457

volatileinta;volatileintb;volatileintc;volatileintd;[Benchmark]publicintTest(){returna+b+c+d;}

Current codegen for Test:

; Assembly listing for method P:Test():int:this (Tier1)  stp fp, lr,[sp, #-0x10]! mov fp,spadd x1, x0, #8 ldapr w1,[x1]add x2, x0, #12 ldapr w2,[x2]add w1, w1, w2 add x2, x0, #16 ldapr w2,[x2]add w1, w1, w2 add x0, x0, #20 ldapr w0,[x0]add w0, w1, w0  ldp fp, lr,[sp], #0x10ret lr ; Total bytes of code 60

New codegen for Test:

; Assembly listing for method P:Test():int:this (Tier1) stp fp, lr,[sp, #-0x10]!mov fp,sp ldapur w1,[x0, #0x08] ldapur w2,[x0, #0x0C]add w1, w1, w2 ldapur w2,[x0, #0x10]add w1, w1, w2 ldapur w0,[x0, #0x14]add w0, w1, w0 ldp fp, lr,[sp], #0x10ret lr; Total bytes of code 44

Apple M2 Max:

MethodJobToolchainMeanErrorStdDevRatio
TestJob-LOXHRO/Core_Root_PR/corerun0.4724 ns0.0050 ns0.0045 ns0.89
TestJob-MPJUHL/Core_Root_main/corerun0.5327 ns0.0063 ns0.0059 ns1.00

Perf difference is not super exciting but it is what it is 🙂

@ghostghost added the area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI label Jul 29, 2023
@ghostghost assigned EgorBoJul 29, 2023
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details
volatileinta;volatileintb;volatileintc;volatileintd;[Benchmark]publicintTest(){returna+b+c+d;}

Current codegen for Test:

; Assembly listing for method P:Test():int:this (Tier1)  stp fp, lr,[sp, #-0x10]! mov fp,spadd x1, x0, #8 ldapr w1,[x1]add x2, x0, #12 ldapr w2,[x2]add w1, w1, w2 add x2, x0, #16 ldapr w2,[x2]add w1, w1, w2 add x0, x0, #20 ldapr w0,[x0]add w0, w1, w0  ldp fp, lr,[sp], #0x10ret lr ; Total bytes of code 60

New codegen for Test:

; Assembly listing for method P:Test():int:this (Tier1) stp fp, lr,[sp, #-0x10]!mov fp,sp ldapur w1,[x0, #0x08] ldapur w2,[x0, #0x0C]add w1, w1, w2 ldapur w2,[x0, #0x10]add w1, w1, w2 ldapur w0,[x0, #0x14]add w0, w1, w0 ldp fp, lr,[sp], #0x10ret lr; Total bytes of code 44
MethodJobToolchainMeanErrorStdDevRatio
TestJob-LOXHRO/Core_Root_PR/corerun0.4724 ns0.0050 ns0.0045 ns0.89
TestJob-MPJUHL/Core_Root_main/corerun0.5327 ns0.0063 ns0.0059 ns1.00

Perf difference is not super exciting but it is what it is 🙂

Author:EgorBo
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-CodeGen-coreclr

Milestone:-

static_assert_no_msg(INS_count <= 512);
instruction _idIns : 9;
static_assert_no_msg(INS_count <= 1024);
instruction _idIns : 10;

@EgorBoEgorBoJul 29, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I added a bit here since we now have more than 512 instructions (and that for sure will be increasing in future) but I also removed an used (on arm) _idCallRegPtr bit so the total size of the struct remains the same - 16b

@EgorBo
EgorBo marked this pull request as ready for review July 30, 2023 17:46
@EgorBoEgorBo added this to the 9.0.0 milestone Aug 5, 2023
@EgorBo
EgorBo marked this pull request as draft August 21, 2023 11:44
@EgorBo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@TIHan @dotnet/jit-contrib PTAL, simple change, emits ldapur where we previously emitted ldapr+add because ldapr doesn't support IMM offsets

@EgorBo
EgorBo requested a review from TIHanAugust 27, 2023 12:55
{
/* This is an indirect call (either a virtual call or func ptr call) */

id->idSetIsCallRegPtr();

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why was this removed for arm32?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I mentioned it in https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/pull/89681/files#r1278410873 comment, basically, it sets a bit that is unused for arm, so I removed that bit because I needed to extend _idIns's width

@TIHanTIHan left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, only one comment on the idSetIsCallingRegPtr.

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@EgorBo@TIHan@neon-sunset
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Emit armv8.4 ldapur* for volatile loads with contained offsets - #89681

Merged
EgorBo merged 22 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
EgorBo:stlur
Aug 31, 2023
Merged

Emit armv8.4 ldapur* for volatile loads with contained offsets#89681
EgorBo merged 22 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
EgorBo:stlur

Conversation

@EgorBo

@EgorBoEgorBo commented Jul 29, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Contributes to #64457

volatileinta;volatileintb;volatileintc;volatileintd;[Benchmark]publicintTest(){returna+b+c+d;}

Current codegen for Test:

; Assembly listing for method P:Test():int:this (Tier1)  stp fp, lr,[sp, #-0x10]! mov fp,spadd x1, x0, #8 ldapr w1,[x1]add x2, x0, #12 ldapr w2,[x2]add w1, w1, w2 add x2, x0, #16 ldapr w2,[x2]add w1, w1, w2 add x0, x0, #20 ldapr w0,[x0]add w0, w1, w0  ldp fp, lr,[sp], #0x10ret lr ; Total bytes of code 60

New codegen for Test:

; Assembly listing for method P:Test():int:this (Tier1) stp fp, lr,[sp, #-0x10]!mov fp,sp ldapur w1,[x0, #0x08] ldapur w2,[x0, #0x0C]add w1, w1, w2 ldapur w2,[x0, #0x10]add w1, w1, w2 ldapur w0,[x0, #0x14]add w0, w1, w0 ldp fp, lr,[sp], #0x10ret lr; Total bytes of code 44

Apple M2 Max:

MethodJobToolchainMeanErrorStdDevRatio
TestJob-LOXHRO/Core_Root_PR/corerun0.4724 ns0.0050 ns0.0045 ns0.89
TestJob-MPJUHL/Core_Root_main/corerun0.5327 ns0.0063 ns0.0059 ns1.00

Perf difference is not super exciting but it is what it is 🙂

@ghostghost added the area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI label Jul 29, 2023
@ghostghost assigned EgorBoJul 29, 2023
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details
volatileinta;volatileintb;volatileintc;volatileintd;[Benchmark]publicintTest(){returna+b+c+d;}

Current codegen for Test:

; Assembly listing for method P:Test():int:this (Tier1)  stp fp, lr,[sp, #-0x10]! mov fp,spadd x1, x0, #8 ldapr w1,[x1]add x2, x0, #12 ldapr w2,[x2]add w1, w1, w2 add x2, x0, #16 ldapr w2,[x2]add w1, w1, w2 add x0, x0, #20 ldapr w0,[x0]add w0, w1, w0  ldp fp, lr,[sp], #0x10ret lr ; Total bytes of code 60

New codegen for Test:

; Assembly listing for method P:Test():int:this (Tier1) stp fp, lr,[sp, #-0x10]!mov fp,sp ldapur w1,[x0, #0x08] ldapur w2,[x0, #0x0C]add w1, w1, w2 ldapur w2,[x0, #0x10]add w1, w1, w2 ldapur w0,[x0, #0x14]add w0, w1, w0 ldp fp, lr,[sp], #0x10ret lr; Total bytes of code 44
MethodJobToolchainMeanErrorStdDevRatio
TestJob-LOXHRO/Core_Root_PR/corerun0.4724 ns0.0050 ns0.0045 ns0.89
TestJob-MPJUHL/Core_Root_main/corerun0.5327 ns0.0063 ns0.0059 ns1.00

Perf difference is not super exciting but it is what it is 🙂

Author:EgorBo
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-CodeGen-coreclr

Milestone:-

static_assert_no_msg(INS_count <= 512);
instruction _idIns : 9;
static_assert_no_msg(INS_count <= 1024);
instruction _idIns : 10;

@EgorBoEgorBoJul 29, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I added a bit here since we now have more than 512 instructions (and that for sure will be increasing in future) but I also removed an used (on arm) _idCallRegPtr bit so the total size of the struct remains the same - 16b

@EgorBo
EgorBo marked this pull request as ready for review July 30, 2023 17:46
@EgorBoEgorBo added this to the 9.0.0 milestone Aug 5, 2023
@EgorBo
EgorBo marked this pull request as draft August 21, 2023 11:44
@EgorBo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@TIHan @dotnet/jit-contrib PTAL, simple change, emits ldapur where we previously emitted ldapr+add because ldapr doesn't support IMM offsets

@EgorBo
EgorBo requested a review from TIHanAugust 27, 2023 12:55
{
/* This is an indirect call (either a virtual call or func ptr call) */

id->idSetIsCallRegPtr();

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why was this removed for arm32?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I mentioned it in https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/pull/89681/files#r1278410873 comment, basically, it sets a bit that is unused for arm, so I removed that bit because I needed to extend _idIns's width

@TIHanTIHan left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, only one comment on the idSetIsCallingRegPtr.

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@EgorBo@TIHan@neon-sunset
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Emit armv8.4 ldapur* for volatile loads with contained offsets - #89681

Merged
EgorBo merged 22 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
EgorBo:stlur
Aug 31, 2023
Merged

Emit armv8.4 ldapur* for volatile loads with contained offsets#89681
EgorBo merged 22 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
EgorBo:stlur

Conversation

@EgorBo

@EgorBoEgorBo commented Jul 29, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Contributes to #64457

volatileinta;volatileintb;volatileintc;volatileintd;[Benchmark]publicintTest(){returna+b+c+d;}

Current codegen for Test:

; Assembly listing for method P:Test():int:this (Tier1)  stp fp, lr,[sp, #-0x10]! mov fp,spadd x1, x0, #8 ldapr w1,[x1]add x2, x0, #12 ldapr w2,[x2]add w1, w1, w2 add x2, x0, #16 ldapr w2,[x2]add w1, w1, w2 add x0, x0, #20 ldapr w0,[x0]add w0, w1, w0  ldp fp, lr,[sp], #0x10ret lr ; Total bytes of code 60

New codegen for Test:

; Assembly listing for method P:Test():int:this (Tier1) stp fp, lr,[sp, #-0x10]!mov fp,sp ldapur w1,[x0, #0x08] ldapur w2,[x0, #0x0C]add w1, w1, w2 ldapur w2,[x0, #0x10]add w1, w1, w2 ldapur w0,[x0, #0x14]add w0, w1, w0 ldp fp, lr,[sp], #0x10ret lr; Total bytes of code 44

Apple M2 Max:

MethodJobToolchainMeanErrorStdDevRatio
TestJob-LOXHRO/Core_Root_PR/corerun0.4724 ns0.0050 ns0.0045 ns0.89
TestJob-MPJUHL/Core_Root_main/corerun0.5327 ns0.0063 ns0.0059 ns1.00

Perf difference is not super exciting but it is what it is 🙂

@ghostghost added the area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI label Jul 29, 2023
@ghostghost assigned EgorBoJul 29, 2023
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details
volatileinta;volatileintb;volatileintc;volatileintd;[Benchmark]publicintTest(){returna+b+c+d;}

Current codegen for Test:

; Assembly listing for method P:Test():int:this (Tier1)  stp fp, lr,[sp, #-0x10]! mov fp,spadd x1, x0, #8 ldapr w1,[x1]add x2, x0, #12 ldapr w2,[x2]add w1, w1, w2 add x2, x0, #16 ldapr w2,[x2]add w1, w1, w2 add x0, x0, #20 ldapr w0,[x0]add w0, w1, w0  ldp fp, lr,[sp], #0x10ret lr ; Total bytes of code 60

New codegen for Test:

; Assembly listing for method P:Test():int:this (Tier1) stp fp, lr,[sp, #-0x10]!mov fp,sp ldapur w1,[x0, #0x08] ldapur w2,[x0, #0x0C]add w1, w1, w2 ldapur w2,[x0, #0x10]add w1, w1, w2 ldapur w0,[x0, #0x14]add w0, w1, w0 ldp fp, lr,[sp], #0x10ret lr; Total bytes of code 44
MethodJobToolchainMeanErrorStdDevRatio
TestJob-LOXHRO/Core_Root_PR/corerun0.4724 ns0.0050 ns0.0045 ns0.89
TestJob-MPJUHL/Core_Root_main/corerun0.5327 ns0.0063 ns0.0059 ns1.00

Perf difference is not super exciting but it is what it is 🙂

Author:EgorBo
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-CodeGen-coreclr

Milestone:-

static_assert_no_msg(INS_count <= 512);
instruction _idIns : 9;
static_assert_no_msg(INS_count <= 1024);
instruction _idIns : 10;

@EgorBoEgorBoJul 29, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I added a bit here since we now have more than 512 instructions (and that for sure will be increasing in future) but I also removed an used (on arm) _idCallRegPtr bit so the total size of the struct remains the same - 16b

@EgorBo
EgorBo marked this pull request as ready for review July 30, 2023 17:46
@EgorBoEgorBo added this to the 9.0.0 milestone Aug 5, 2023
@EgorBo
EgorBo marked this pull request as draft August 21, 2023 11:44
@EgorBo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@TIHan @dotnet/jit-contrib PTAL, simple change, emits ldapur where we previously emitted ldapr+add because ldapr doesn't support IMM offsets

@EgorBo
EgorBo requested a review from TIHanAugust 27, 2023 12:55
{
/* This is an indirect call (either a virtual call or func ptr call) */

id->idSetIsCallRegPtr();

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why was this removed for arm32?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I mentioned it in https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/pull/89681/files#r1278410873 comment, basically, it sets a bit that is unused for arm, so I removed that bit because I needed to extend _idIns's width

@TIHanTIHan left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, only one comment on the idSetIsCallingRegPtr.

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@EgorBo@TIHan@neon-sunset
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Emit armv8.4 ldapur* for volatile loads with contained offsets - #89681

Merged
EgorBo merged 22 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
EgorBo:stlur
Aug 31, 2023
Merged

Emit armv8.4 ldapur* for volatile loads with contained offsets#89681
EgorBo merged 22 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
EgorBo:stlur

Conversation

@EgorBo

@EgorBoEgorBo commented Jul 29, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Contributes to #64457

volatileinta;volatileintb;volatileintc;volatileintd;[Benchmark]publicintTest(){returna+b+c+d;}

Current codegen for Test:

; Assembly listing for method P:Test():int:this (Tier1)  stp fp, lr,[sp, #-0x10]! mov fp,spadd x1, x0, #8 ldapr w1,[x1]add x2, x0, #12 ldapr w2,[x2]add w1, w1, w2 add x2, x0, #16 ldapr w2,[x2]add w1, w1, w2 add x0, x0, #20 ldapr w0,[x0]add w0, w1, w0  ldp fp, lr,[sp], #0x10ret lr ; Total bytes of code 60

New codegen for Test:

; Assembly listing for method P:Test():int:this (Tier1) stp fp, lr,[sp, #-0x10]!mov fp,sp ldapur w1,[x0, #0x08] ldapur w2,[x0, #0x0C]add w1, w1, w2 ldapur w2,[x0, #0x10]add w1, w1, w2 ldapur w0,[x0, #0x14]add w0, w1, w0 ldp fp, lr,[sp], #0x10ret lr; Total bytes of code 44

Apple M2 Max:

MethodJobToolchainMeanErrorStdDevRatio
TestJob-LOXHRO/Core_Root_PR/corerun0.4724 ns0.0050 ns0.0045 ns0.89
TestJob-MPJUHL/Core_Root_main/corerun0.5327 ns0.0063 ns0.0059 ns1.00

Perf difference is not super exciting but it is what it is 🙂

@ghostghost added the area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI label Jul 29, 2023
@ghostghost assigned EgorBoJul 29, 2023
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details
volatileinta;volatileintb;volatileintc;volatileintd;[Benchmark]publicintTest(){returna+b+c+d;}

Current codegen for Test:

; Assembly listing for method P:Test():int:this (Tier1)  stp fp, lr,[sp, #-0x10]! mov fp,spadd x1, x0, #8 ldapr w1,[x1]add x2, x0, #12 ldapr w2,[x2]add w1, w1, w2 add x2, x0, #16 ldapr w2,[x2]add w1, w1, w2 add x0, x0, #20 ldapr w0,[x0]add w0, w1, w0  ldp fp, lr,[sp], #0x10ret lr ; Total bytes of code 60

New codegen for Test:

; Assembly listing for method P:Test():int:this (Tier1) stp fp, lr,[sp, #-0x10]!mov fp,sp ldapur w1,[x0, #0x08] ldapur w2,[x0, #0x0C]add w1, w1, w2 ldapur w2,[x0, #0x10]add w1, w1, w2 ldapur w0,[x0, #0x14]add w0, w1, w0 ldp fp, lr,[sp], #0x10ret lr; Total bytes of code 44
MethodJobToolchainMeanErrorStdDevRatio
TestJob-LOXHRO/Core_Root_PR/corerun0.4724 ns0.0050 ns0.0045 ns0.89
TestJob-MPJUHL/Core_Root_main/corerun0.5327 ns0.0063 ns0.0059 ns1.00

Perf difference is not super exciting but it is what it is 🙂

Author:EgorBo
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-CodeGen-coreclr

Milestone:-

static_assert_no_msg(INS_count <= 512);
instruction _idIns : 9;
static_assert_no_msg(INS_count <= 1024);
instruction _idIns : 10;

@EgorBoEgorBoJul 29, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I added a bit here since we now have more than 512 instructions (and that for sure will be increasing in future) but I also removed an used (on arm) _idCallRegPtr bit so the total size of the struct remains the same - 16b

@EgorBo
EgorBo marked this pull request as ready for review July 30, 2023 17:46
@EgorBoEgorBo added this to the 9.0.0 milestone Aug 5, 2023
@EgorBo
EgorBo marked this pull request as draft August 21, 2023 11:44
@EgorBo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@TIHan @dotnet/jit-contrib PTAL, simple change, emits ldapur where we previously emitted ldapr+add because ldapr doesn't support IMM offsets

@EgorBo
EgorBo requested a review from TIHanAugust 27, 2023 12:55
{
/* This is an indirect call (either a virtual call or func ptr call) */

id->idSetIsCallRegPtr();

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why was this removed for arm32?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I mentioned it in https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/pull/89681/files#r1278410873 comment, basically, it sets a bit that is unused for arm, so I removed that bit because I needed to extend _idIns's width

@TIHanTIHan left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, only one comment on the idSetIsCallingRegPtr.

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@EgorBo@TIHan@neon-sunset
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Emit armv8.4 ldapur* for volatile loads with contained offsets - #89681

Merged
EgorBo merged 22 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
EgorBo:stlur
Aug 31, 2023
Merged

Emit armv8.4 ldapur* for volatile loads with contained offsets#89681
EgorBo merged 22 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
EgorBo:stlur

Conversation

@EgorBo

@EgorBoEgorBo commented Jul 29, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Contributes to #64457

volatileinta;volatileintb;volatileintc;volatileintd;[Benchmark]publicintTest(){returna+b+c+d;}

Current codegen for Test:

; Assembly listing for method P:Test():int:this (Tier1)  stp fp, lr,[sp, #-0x10]! mov fp,spadd x1, x0, #8 ldapr w1,[x1]add x2, x0, #12 ldapr w2,[x2]add w1, w1, w2 add x2, x0, #16 ldapr w2,[x2]add w1, w1, w2 add x0, x0, #20 ldapr w0,[x0]add w0, w1, w0  ldp fp, lr,[sp], #0x10ret lr ; Total bytes of code 60

New codegen for Test:

; Assembly listing for method P:Test():int:this (Tier1) stp fp, lr,[sp, #-0x10]!mov fp,sp ldapur w1,[x0, #0x08] ldapur w2,[x0, #0x0C]add w1, w1, w2 ldapur w2,[x0, #0x10]add w1, w1, w2 ldapur w0,[x0, #0x14]add w0, w1, w0 ldp fp, lr,[sp], #0x10ret lr; Total bytes of code 44

Apple M2 Max:

MethodJobToolchainMeanErrorStdDevRatio
TestJob-LOXHRO/Core_Root_PR/corerun0.4724 ns0.0050 ns0.0045 ns0.89
TestJob-MPJUHL/Core_Root_main/corerun0.5327 ns0.0063 ns0.0059 ns1.00

Perf difference is not super exciting but it is what it is 🙂

@ghostghost added the area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI label Jul 29, 2023
@ghostghost assigned EgorBoJul 29, 2023
@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details
volatileinta;volatileintb;volatileintc;volatileintd;[Benchmark]publicintTest(){returna+b+c+d;}

Current codegen for Test:

; Assembly listing for method P:Test():int:this (Tier1)  stp fp, lr,[sp, #-0x10]! mov fp,spadd x1, x0, #8 ldapr w1,[x1]add x2, x0, #12 ldapr w2,[x2]add w1, w1, w2 add x2, x0, #16 ldapr w2,[x2]add w1, w1, w2 add x0, x0, #20 ldapr w0,[x0]add w0, w1, w0  ldp fp, lr,[sp], #0x10ret lr ; Total bytes of code 60

New codegen for Test:

; Assembly listing for method P:Test():int:this (Tier1) stp fp, lr,[sp, #-0x10]!mov fp,sp ldapur w1,[x0, #0x08] ldapur w2,[x0, #0x0C]add w1, w1, w2 ldapur w2,[x0, #0x10]add w1, w1, w2 ldapur w0,[x0, #0x14]add w0, w1, w0 ldp fp, lr,[sp], #0x10ret lr; Total bytes of code 44
MethodJobToolchainMeanErrorStdDevRatio
TestJob-LOXHRO/Core_Root_PR/corerun0.4724 ns0.0050 ns0.0045 ns0.89
TestJob-MPJUHL/Core_Root_main/corerun0.5327 ns0.0063 ns0.0059 ns1.00

Perf difference is not super exciting but it is what it is 🙂

Author:EgorBo
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-CodeGen-coreclr

Milestone:-

static_assert_no_msg(INS_count <= 512);
instruction _idIns : 9;
static_assert_no_msg(INS_count <= 1024);
instruction _idIns : 10;

@EgorBoEgorBoJul 29, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I added a bit here since we now have more than 512 instructions (and that for sure will be increasing in future) but I also removed an used (on arm) _idCallRegPtr bit so the total size of the struct remains the same - 16b

@EgorBo
EgorBo marked this pull request as ready for review July 30, 2023 17:46
@EgorBoEgorBo added this to the 9.0.0 milestone Aug 5, 2023
@EgorBo
EgorBo marked this pull request as draft August 21, 2023 11:44
@EgorBo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@TIHan @dotnet/jit-contrib PTAL, simple change, emits ldapur where we previously emitted ldapr+add because ldapr doesn't support IMM offsets

@EgorBo
EgorBo requested a review from TIHanAugust 27, 2023 12:55
{
/* This is an indirect call (either a virtual call or func ptr call) */

id->idSetIsCallRegPtr();

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why was this removed for arm32?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I mentioned it in https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/pull/89681/files#r1278410873 comment, basically, it sets a bit that is unused for arm, so I removed that bit because I needed to extend _idIns's width

@TIHanTIHan left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, only one comment on the idSetIsCallingRegPtr.

Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-CodeGen-coreclrCLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@EgorBo@TIHan@neon-sunset