[release/8.0] Metrics Feature Switch - #92019

Merged
carlossanlop merged 4 commits into
dotnet:release/8.0from
tarekgh:release/8.0
Sep 14, 2023
Merged

[release/8.0] Metrics Feature Switch#92019
carlossanlop merged 4 commits into
dotnet:release/8.0from
tarekgh:release/8.0

Conversation

@tarekgh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fixes#89880

Backport of #91767 to release/8.0

/cc @tarekgh

Customer Impact

The introduction of a feature switch enables the option to disable the metrics feature, aiding in trimming and AOT scenarios. This modification addresses and resolves the performance regression observed in Xamarin app startup scenarios. For additional information, please refer to the following issue: #89880.

Testing

Successfully ran all regressions test and added a new test covering testing when the new switch is enabled.

Risk

We haven't made any alterations or adjustments to the code or logic when the new switch is left disabled. Therefore, any modifications will only become apparent when the switch is activated. The risk of this change adversely affecting any existing, functional functionality is exceedingly low.

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

@ghostghost added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Sep 13, 2023
@ghostghost assigned tarekghSep 13, 2023
@tarekghtarekgh added area-System.Diagnostics.Metric and removed needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners labels Sep 13, 2023
@tarekghtarekgh added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Sep 13, 2023
@tarekgh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

CC @noahfalk@eerhardt

@tarekghtarekgh added the Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review label Sep 13, 2023
@tarekgh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@ericstj please have a look and approve it if you don't see any concerns with it. Thanks!

@ericstjericstj left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This LGTM and I approve for RC2.

One ask is to double check that this will integrate well by staging the changes you want to make in the SDK and confirming the right default / feature enabled behavior. I know I've mixed up defaults or true/false values more than once myself.

@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@artl93 this is ready for your approval as well.

@tarekgh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

One ask is to double check that this will integrate well by staging the changes you want to make in the SDK and confirming the right default / feature enabled behavior. I know I've mixed up defaults or true/false values more than once myself.

I am currently doing some more tests. Please hold merging till I finish. nothing alarming so far :-)

@tarekgh

tarekgh commented Sep 14, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@ericstj I have done more manual testing building and running as AOT. I confirmed when the switch is not defined or it is defined with true value, I see the metrics functionality is enabled and work as expected. When defining the switch with false value, I am seeing the new behavior which disables metrics functionality. I think we are good to go. I haven't done the SDK changes yet which I'll do more testing when having it.

@artl93

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@ericstj I have done more manual testing building and running as AOT. I confirmed when the switch is not defined or it is defined with true value, I see the metrics functionality is enabled and work as expected. When defining the switch with false value, I am seeing the new behavior which disables metrics functionality. I think we are good to go. I haven't done the SDK changes yet which I'll do more testing when having it.

For my education, what do you mean by, "When having it"? Do you mean after merge and the SDK is produced?

@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This change in dotnet/runtime will require corresponding change in the SDK targets to expose this new feature to the build. Those changes will look similar to these:
https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Adotnet%2Fsdk+EventSourceSupport+language%3AXML&type=code&l=XML

@artl93artl93 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

M2 approved. Thanks!

@artl93artl93 added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Sep 14, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop merged commit 3aec961 into dotnet:release/8.0Sep 14, 2023
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2023
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 14, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@tarekgh@ericstj@artl93@eerhardt@carlossanlop
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

[release/8.0] Metrics Feature Switch - #92019

Merged
carlossanlop merged 4 commits into
dotnet:release/8.0from
tarekgh:release/8.0
Sep 14, 2023
Merged

[release/8.0] Metrics Feature Switch#92019
carlossanlop merged 4 commits into
dotnet:release/8.0from
tarekgh:release/8.0

Conversation

@tarekgh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fixes#89880

Backport of #91767 to release/8.0

/cc @tarekgh

Customer Impact

The introduction of a feature switch enables the option to disable the metrics feature, aiding in trimming and AOT scenarios. This modification addresses and resolves the performance regression observed in Xamarin app startup scenarios. For additional information, please refer to the following issue: #89880.

Testing

Successfully ran all regressions test and added a new test covering testing when the new switch is enabled.

Risk

We haven't made any alterations or adjustments to the code or logic when the new switch is left disabled. Therefore, any modifications will only become apparent when the switch is activated. The risk of this change adversely affecting any existing, functional functionality is exceedingly low.

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

@ghostghost added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Sep 13, 2023
@ghostghost assigned tarekghSep 13, 2023
@tarekghtarekgh added area-System.Diagnostics.Metric and removed needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners labels Sep 13, 2023
@tarekghtarekgh added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Sep 13, 2023
@tarekgh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

CC @noahfalk@eerhardt

@tarekghtarekgh added the Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review label Sep 13, 2023
@tarekgh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@ericstj please have a look and approve it if you don't see any concerns with it. Thanks!

@ericstjericstj left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This LGTM and I approve for RC2.

One ask is to double check that this will integrate well by staging the changes you want to make in the SDK and confirming the right default / feature enabled behavior. I know I've mixed up defaults or true/false values more than once myself.

@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@artl93 this is ready for your approval as well.

@tarekgh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

One ask is to double check that this will integrate well by staging the changes you want to make in the SDK and confirming the right default / feature enabled behavior. I know I've mixed up defaults or true/false values more than once myself.

I am currently doing some more tests. Please hold merging till I finish. nothing alarming so far :-)

@tarekgh

tarekgh commented Sep 14, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@ericstj I have done more manual testing building and running as AOT. I confirmed when the switch is not defined or it is defined with true value, I see the metrics functionality is enabled and work as expected. When defining the switch with false value, I am seeing the new behavior which disables metrics functionality. I think we are good to go. I haven't done the SDK changes yet which I'll do more testing when having it.

@artl93

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@ericstj I have done more manual testing building and running as AOT. I confirmed when the switch is not defined or it is defined with true value, I see the metrics functionality is enabled and work as expected. When defining the switch with false value, I am seeing the new behavior which disables metrics functionality. I think we are good to go. I haven't done the SDK changes yet which I'll do more testing when having it.

For my education, what do you mean by, "When having it"? Do you mean after merge and the SDK is produced?

@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This change in dotnet/runtime will require corresponding change in the SDK targets to expose this new feature to the build. Those changes will look similar to these:
https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Adotnet%2Fsdk+EventSourceSupport+language%3AXML&type=code&l=XML

@artl93artl93 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

M2 approved. Thanks!

@artl93artl93 added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Sep 14, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop merged commit 3aec961 into dotnet:release/8.0Sep 14, 2023
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2023
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 14, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@tarekgh@ericstj@artl93@eerhardt@carlossanlop
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[release/8.0] Metrics Feature Switch - #92019

Merged
carlossanlop merged 4 commits into
dotnet:release/8.0from
tarekgh:release/8.0
Sep 14, 2023
Merged

[release/8.0] Metrics Feature Switch#92019
carlossanlop merged 4 commits into
dotnet:release/8.0from
tarekgh:release/8.0

Conversation

@tarekgh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fixes#89880

Backport of #91767 to release/8.0

/cc @tarekgh

Customer Impact

The introduction of a feature switch enables the option to disable the metrics feature, aiding in trimming and AOT scenarios. This modification addresses and resolves the performance regression observed in Xamarin app startup scenarios. For additional information, please refer to the following issue: #89880.

Testing

Successfully ran all regressions test and added a new test covering testing when the new switch is enabled.

Risk

We haven't made any alterations or adjustments to the code or logic when the new switch is left disabled. Therefore, any modifications will only become apparent when the switch is activated. The risk of this change adversely affecting any existing, functional functionality is exceedingly low.

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

@ghostghost added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Sep 13, 2023
@ghostghost assigned tarekghSep 13, 2023
@tarekghtarekgh added area-System.Diagnostics.Metric and removed needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners labels Sep 13, 2023
@tarekghtarekgh added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Sep 13, 2023
@tarekgh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

CC @noahfalk@eerhardt

@tarekghtarekgh added the Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review label Sep 13, 2023
@tarekgh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@ericstj please have a look and approve it if you don't see any concerns with it. Thanks!

@ericstjericstj left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This LGTM and I approve for RC2.

One ask is to double check that this will integrate well by staging the changes you want to make in the SDK and confirming the right default / feature enabled behavior. I know I've mixed up defaults or true/false values more than once myself.

@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@artl93 this is ready for your approval as well.

@tarekgh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

One ask is to double check that this will integrate well by staging the changes you want to make in the SDK and confirming the right default / feature enabled behavior. I know I've mixed up defaults or true/false values more than once myself.

I am currently doing some more tests. Please hold merging till I finish. nothing alarming so far :-)

@tarekgh

tarekgh commented Sep 14, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@ericstj I have done more manual testing building and running as AOT. I confirmed when the switch is not defined or it is defined with true value, I see the metrics functionality is enabled and work as expected. When defining the switch with false value, I am seeing the new behavior which disables metrics functionality. I think we are good to go. I haven't done the SDK changes yet which I'll do more testing when having it.

@artl93

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@ericstj I have done more manual testing building and running as AOT. I confirmed when the switch is not defined or it is defined with true value, I see the metrics functionality is enabled and work as expected. When defining the switch with false value, I am seeing the new behavior which disables metrics functionality. I think we are good to go. I haven't done the SDK changes yet which I'll do more testing when having it.

For my education, what do you mean by, "When having it"? Do you mean after merge and the SDK is produced?

@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This change in dotnet/runtime will require corresponding change in the SDK targets to expose this new feature to the build. Those changes will look similar to these:
https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Adotnet%2Fsdk+EventSourceSupport+language%3AXML&type=code&l=XML

@artl93artl93 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

M2 approved. Thanks!

@artl93artl93 added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Sep 14, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop merged commit 3aec961 into dotnet:release/8.0Sep 14, 2023
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2023
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 14, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@tarekgh@ericstj@artl93@eerhardt@carlossanlop
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[release/8.0] Metrics Feature Switch - #92019

Merged
carlossanlop merged 4 commits into
dotnet:release/8.0from
tarekgh:release/8.0
Sep 14, 2023
Merged

[release/8.0] Metrics Feature Switch#92019
carlossanlop merged 4 commits into
dotnet:release/8.0from
tarekgh:release/8.0

Conversation

@tarekgh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fixes#89880

Backport of #91767 to release/8.0

/cc @tarekgh

Customer Impact

The introduction of a feature switch enables the option to disable the metrics feature, aiding in trimming and AOT scenarios. This modification addresses and resolves the performance regression observed in Xamarin app startup scenarios. For additional information, please refer to the following issue: #89880.

Testing

Successfully ran all regressions test and added a new test covering testing when the new switch is enabled.

Risk

We haven't made any alterations or adjustments to the code or logic when the new switch is left disabled. Therefore, any modifications will only become apparent when the switch is activated. The risk of this change adversely affecting any existing, functional functionality is exceedingly low.

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

@ghostghost added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Sep 13, 2023
@ghostghost assigned tarekghSep 13, 2023
@tarekghtarekgh added area-System.Diagnostics.Metric and removed needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners labels Sep 13, 2023
@tarekghtarekgh added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Sep 13, 2023
@tarekgh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

CC @noahfalk@eerhardt

@tarekghtarekgh added the Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review label Sep 13, 2023
@tarekgh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@ericstj please have a look and approve it if you don't see any concerns with it. Thanks!

@ericstjericstj left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This LGTM and I approve for RC2.

One ask is to double check that this will integrate well by staging the changes you want to make in the SDK and confirming the right default / feature enabled behavior. I know I've mixed up defaults or true/false values more than once myself.

@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@artl93 this is ready for your approval as well.

@tarekgh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

One ask is to double check that this will integrate well by staging the changes you want to make in the SDK and confirming the right default / feature enabled behavior. I know I've mixed up defaults or true/false values more than once myself.

I am currently doing some more tests. Please hold merging till I finish. nothing alarming so far :-)

@tarekgh

tarekgh commented Sep 14, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@ericstj I have done more manual testing building and running as AOT. I confirmed when the switch is not defined or it is defined with true value, I see the metrics functionality is enabled and work as expected. When defining the switch with false value, I am seeing the new behavior which disables metrics functionality. I think we are good to go. I haven't done the SDK changes yet which I'll do more testing when having it.

@artl93

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@ericstj I have done more manual testing building and running as AOT. I confirmed when the switch is not defined or it is defined with true value, I see the metrics functionality is enabled and work as expected. When defining the switch with false value, I am seeing the new behavior which disables metrics functionality. I think we are good to go. I haven't done the SDK changes yet which I'll do more testing when having it.

For my education, what do you mean by, "When having it"? Do you mean after merge and the SDK is produced?

@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This change in dotnet/runtime will require corresponding change in the SDK targets to expose this new feature to the build. Those changes will look similar to these:
https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Adotnet%2Fsdk+EventSourceSupport+language%3AXML&type=code&l=XML

@artl93artl93 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

M2 approved. Thanks!

@artl93artl93 added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Sep 14, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop merged commit 3aec961 into dotnet:release/8.0Sep 14, 2023
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2023
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 14, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@tarekgh@ericstj@artl93@eerhardt@carlossanlop
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

[release/8.0] Metrics Feature Switch - #92019

Merged
carlossanlop merged 4 commits into
dotnet:release/8.0from
tarekgh:release/8.0
Sep 14, 2023
Merged

[release/8.0] Metrics Feature Switch#92019
carlossanlop merged 4 commits into
dotnet:release/8.0from
tarekgh:release/8.0

Conversation

@tarekgh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fixes#89880

Backport of #91767 to release/8.0

/cc @tarekgh

Customer Impact

The introduction of a feature switch enables the option to disable the metrics feature, aiding in trimming and AOT scenarios. This modification addresses and resolves the performance regression observed in Xamarin app startup scenarios. For additional information, please refer to the following issue: #89880.

Testing

Successfully ran all regressions test and added a new test covering testing when the new switch is enabled.

Risk

We haven't made any alterations or adjustments to the code or logic when the new switch is left disabled. Therefore, any modifications will only become apparent when the switch is activated. The risk of this change adversely affecting any existing, functional functionality is exceedingly low.

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

@ghostghost added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Sep 13, 2023
@ghostghost assigned tarekghSep 13, 2023
@tarekghtarekgh added area-System.Diagnostics.Metric and removed needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners labels Sep 13, 2023
@tarekghtarekgh added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Sep 13, 2023
@tarekgh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

CC @noahfalk@eerhardt

@tarekghtarekgh added the Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review label Sep 13, 2023
@tarekgh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@ericstj please have a look and approve it if you don't see any concerns with it. Thanks!

@ericstjericstj left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This LGTM and I approve for RC2.

One ask is to double check that this will integrate well by staging the changes you want to make in the SDK and confirming the right default / feature enabled behavior. I know I've mixed up defaults or true/false values more than once myself.

@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@artl93 this is ready for your approval as well.

@tarekgh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

One ask is to double check that this will integrate well by staging the changes you want to make in the SDK and confirming the right default / feature enabled behavior. I know I've mixed up defaults or true/false values more than once myself.

I am currently doing some more tests. Please hold merging till I finish. nothing alarming so far :-)

@tarekgh

tarekgh commented Sep 14, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@ericstj I have done more manual testing building and running as AOT. I confirmed when the switch is not defined or it is defined with true value, I see the metrics functionality is enabled and work as expected. When defining the switch with false value, I am seeing the new behavior which disables metrics functionality. I think we are good to go. I haven't done the SDK changes yet which I'll do more testing when having it.

@artl93

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@ericstj I have done more manual testing building and running as AOT. I confirmed when the switch is not defined or it is defined with true value, I see the metrics functionality is enabled and work as expected. When defining the switch with false value, I am seeing the new behavior which disables metrics functionality. I think we are good to go. I haven't done the SDK changes yet which I'll do more testing when having it.

For my education, what do you mean by, "When having it"? Do you mean after merge and the SDK is produced?

@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This change in dotnet/runtime will require corresponding change in the SDK targets to expose this new feature to the build. Those changes will look similar to these:
https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Adotnet%2Fsdk+EventSourceSupport+language%3AXML&type=code&l=XML

@artl93artl93 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

M2 approved. Thanks!

@artl93artl93 added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Sep 14, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop merged commit 3aec961 into dotnet:release/8.0Sep 14, 2023
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2023
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 14, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@tarekgh@ericstj@artl93@eerhardt@carlossanlop
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[release/8.0] Metrics Feature Switch - #92019

Merged
carlossanlop merged 4 commits into
dotnet:release/8.0from
tarekgh:release/8.0
Sep 14, 2023
Merged

[release/8.0] Metrics Feature Switch#92019
carlossanlop merged 4 commits into
dotnet:release/8.0from
tarekgh:release/8.0

Conversation

@tarekgh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fixes#89880

Backport of #91767 to release/8.0

/cc @tarekgh

Customer Impact

The introduction of a feature switch enables the option to disable the metrics feature, aiding in trimming and AOT scenarios. This modification addresses and resolves the performance regression observed in Xamarin app startup scenarios. For additional information, please refer to the following issue: #89880.

Testing

Successfully ran all regressions test and added a new test covering testing when the new switch is enabled.

Risk

We haven't made any alterations or adjustments to the code or logic when the new switch is left disabled. Therefore, any modifications will only become apparent when the switch is activated. The risk of this change adversely affecting any existing, functional functionality is exceedingly low.

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

@ghostghost added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Sep 13, 2023
@ghostghost assigned tarekghSep 13, 2023
@tarekghtarekgh added area-System.Diagnostics.Metric and removed needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners labels Sep 13, 2023
@tarekghtarekgh added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Sep 13, 2023
@tarekgh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

CC @noahfalk@eerhardt

@tarekghtarekgh added the Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review label Sep 13, 2023
@tarekgh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@ericstj please have a look and approve it if you don't see any concerns with it. Thanks!

@ericstjericstj left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This LGTM and I approve for RC2.

One ask is to double check that this will integrate well by staging the changes you want to make in the SDK and confirming the right default / feature enabled behavior. I know I've mixed up defaults or true/false values more than once myself.

@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@artl93 this is ready for your approval as well.

@tarekgh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

One ask is to double check that this will integrate well by staging the changes you want to make in the SDK and confirming the right default / feature enabled behavior. I know I've mixed up defaults or true/false values more than once myself.

I am currently doing some more tests. Please hold merging till I finish. nothing alarming so far :-)

@tarekgh

tarekgh commented Sep 14, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@ericstj I have done more manual testing building and running as AOT. I confirmed when the switch is not defined or it is defined with true value, I see the metrics functionality is enabled and work as expected. When defining the switch with false value, I am seeing the new behavior which disables metrics functionality. I think we are good to go. I haven't done the SDK changes yet which I'll do more testing when having it.

@artl93

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@ericstj I have done more manual testing building and running as AOT. I confirmed when the switch is not defined or it is defined with true value, I see the metrics functionality is enabled and work as expected. When defining the switch with false value, I am seeing the new behavior which disables metrics functionality. I think we are good to go. I haven't done the SDK changes yet which I'll do more testing when having it.

For my education, what do you mean by, "When having it"? Do you mean after merge and the SDK is produced?

@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This change in dotnet/runtime will require corresponding change in the SDK targets to expose this new feature to the build. Those changes will look similar to these:
https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Adotnet%2Fsdk+EventSourceSupport+language%3AXML&type=code&l=XML

@artl93artl93 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

M2 approved. Thanks!

@artl93artl93 added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Sep 14, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop merged commit 3aec961 into dotnet:release/8.0Sep 14, 2023
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2023
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 14, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@tarekgh@ericstj@artl93@eerhardt@carlossanlop
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

[release/8.0] Metrics Feature Switch - #92019

Merged
carlossanlop merged 4 commits into
dotnet:release/8.0from
tarekgh:release/8.0
Sep 14, 2023
Merged

[release/8.0] Metrics Feature Switch#92019
carlossanlop merged 4 commits into
dotnet:release/8.0from
tarekgh:release/8.0

Conversation

@tarekgh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fixes#89880

Backport of #91767 to release/8.0

/cc @tarekgh

Customer Impact

The introduction of a feature switch enables the option to disable the metrics feature, aiding in trimming and AOT scenarios. This modification addresses and resolves the performance regression observed in Xamarin app startup scenarios. For additional information, please refer to the following issue: #89880.

Testing

Successfully ran all regressions test and added a new test covering testing when the new switch is enabled.

Risk

We haven't made any alterations or adjustments to the code or logic when the new switch is left disabled. Therefore, any modifications will only become apparent when the switch is activated. The risk of this change adversely affecting any existing, functional functionality is exceedingly low.

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

@ghostghost added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Sep 13, 2023
@ghostghost assigned tarekghSep 13, 2023
@tarekghtarekgh added area-System.Diagnostics.Metric and removed needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners labels Sep 13, 2023
@tarekghtarekgh added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Sep 13, 2023
@tarekgh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

CC @noahfalk@eerhardt

@tarekghtarekgh added the Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review label Sep 13, 2023
@tarekgh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@ericstj please have a look and approve it if you don't see any concerns with it. Thanks!

@ericstjericstj left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This LGTM and I approve for RC2.

One ask is to double check that this will integrate well by staging the changes you want to make in the SDK and confirming the right default / feature enabled behavior. I know I've mixed up defaults or true/false values more than once myself.

@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@artl93 this is ready for your approval as well.

@tarekgh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

One ask is to double check that this will integrate well by staging the changes you want to make in the SDK and confirming the right default / feature enabled behavior. I know I've mixed up defaults or true/false values more than once myself.

I am currently doing some more tests. Please hold merging till I finish. nothing alarming so far :-)

@tarekgh

tarekgh commented Sep 14, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@ericstj I have done more manual testing building and running as AOT. I confirmed when the switch is not defined or it is defined with true value, I see the metrics functionality is enabled and work as expected. When defining the switch with false value, I am seeing the new behavior which disables metrics functionality. I think we are good to go. I haven't done the SDK changes yet which I'll do more testing when having it.

@artl93

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@ericstj I have done more manual testing building and running as AOT. I confirmed when the switch is not defined or it is defined with true value, I see the metrics functionality is enabled and work as expected. When defining the switch with false value, I am seeing the new behavior which disables metrics functionality. I think we are good to go. I haven't done the SDK changes yet which I'll do more testing when having it.

For my education, what do you mean by, "When having it"? Do you mean after merge and the SDK is produced?

@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This change in dotnet/runtime will require corresponding change in the SDK targets to expose this new feature to the build. Those changes will look similar to these:
https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Adotnet%2Fsdk+EventSourceSupport+language%3AXML&type=code&l=XML

@artl93artl93 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

M2 approved. Thanks!

@artl93artl93 added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Sep 14, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop merged commit 3aec961 into dotnet:release/8.0Sep 14, 2023
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2023
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 14, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@tarekgh@ericstj@artl93@eerhardt@carlossanlop
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

[release/8.0] Metrics Feature Switch - #92019

Merged
carlossanlop merged 4 commits into
dotnet:release/8.0from
tarekgh:release/8.0
Sep 14, 2023
Merged

[release/8.0] Metrics Feature Switch#92019
carlossanlop merged 4 commits into
dotnet:release/8.0from
tarekgh:release/8.0

Conversation

@tarekgh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fixes#89880

Backport of #91767 to release/8.0

/cc @tarekgh

Customer Impact

The introduction of a feature switch enables the option to disable the metrics feature, aiding in trimming and AOT scenarios. This modification addresses and resolves the performance regression observed in Xamarin app startup scenarios. For additional information, please refer to the following issue: #89880.

Testing

Successfully ran all regressions test and added a new test covering testing when the new switch is enabled.

Risk

We haven't made any alterations or adjustments to the code or logic when the new switch is left disabled. Therefore, any modifications will only become apparent when the switch is activated. The risk of this change adversely affecting any existing, functional functionality is exceedingly low.

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

@ghostghost added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Sep 13, 2023
@ghostghost assigned tarekghSep 13, 2023
@tarekghtarekgh added area-System.Diagnostics.Metric and removed needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners labels Sep 13, 2023
@tarekghtarekgh added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Sep 13, 2023
@tarekgh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

CC @noahfalk@eerhardt

@tarekghtarekgh added the Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review label Sep 13, 2023
@tarekgh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@ericstj please have a look and approve it if you don't see any concerns with it. Thanks!

@ericstjericstj left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This LGTM and I approve for RC2.

One ask is to double check that this will integrate well by staging the changes you want to make in the SDK and confirming the right default / feature enabled behavior. I know I've mixed up defaults or true/false values more than once myself.

@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@artl93 this is ready for your approval as well.

@tarekgh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

One ask is to double check that this will integrate well by staging the changes you want to make in the SDK and confirming the right default / feature enabled behavior. I know I've mixed up defaults or true/false values more than once myself.

I am currently doing some more tests. Please hold merging till I finish. nothing alarming so far :-)

@tarekgh

tarekgh commented Sep 14, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@ericstj I have done more manual testing building and running as AOT. I confirmed when the switch is not defined or it is defined with true value, I see the metrics functionality is enabled and work as expected. When defining the switch with false value, I am seeing the new behavior which disables metrics functionality. I think we are good to go. I haven't done the SDK changes yet which I'll do more testing when having it.

@artl93

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@ericstj I have done more manual testing building and running as AOT. I confirmed when the switch is not defined or it is defined with true value, I see the metrics functionality is enabled and work as expected. When defining the switch with false value, I am seeing the new behavior which disables metrics functionality. I think we are good to go. I haven't done the SDK changes yet which I'll do more testing when having it.

For my education, what do you mean by, "When having it"? Do you mean after merge and the SDK is produced?

@ericstj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This change in dotnet/runtime will require corresponding change in the SDK targets to expose this new feature to the build. Those changes will look similar to these:
https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Adotnet%2Fsdk+EventSourceSupport+language%3AXML&type=code&l=XML

@artl93artl93 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

M2 approved. Thanks!

@artl93artl93 added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Sep 14, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop merged commit 3aec961 into dotnet:release/8.0Sep 14, 2023
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2023
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 14, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@tarekgh@ericstj@artl93@eerhardt@carlossanlop