Skip to content

[release/8.0] Fix support of FromKeyedServicesAttribute in ActivatorUtilities.CreateFactory - #92144

Merged
ericstj merged 2 commits into
release/8.0from
backport/pr-92082-to-release/8.0
Sep 16, 2023
Merged

[release/8.0] Fix support of FromKeyedServicesAttribute in ActivatorUtilities.CreateFactory#92144
ericstj merged 2 commits into
release/8.0from
backport/pr-92082-to-release/8.0

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Sep 15, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #92082 to release/8.0

Fixes#92076

/cc @benjaminpetit

Customer Impact

Without this fix, keyed DI does not work when using ActivatorUtilities.CreateFactory. This impact notably MVC and SignalR, and make it impossible to use keyed DI in controller and hub constructors.

Testing

Test cases added in this PR, and also manually tested that the fix works in MVC.

Risk

Some perf impact due do the added reflection step to check attributes on constructor parameters. The result of ActivatorUtilities.CreateFactory is typically only called once per type and then cached by the application, so it should not have an impact too big.

If the attribute doesn't exist, the existing logic should not have changed.

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-extensions-dependencyinjection
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Backport of #92082 to release/8.0

/cc @benjaminpetit

Customer Impact

Testing

Risk

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

Author:github-actions[bot]
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-Extensions-DependencyInjection

Milestone:-

@stevehartersteveharter added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Sep 15, 2023
@ericstjericstj added the Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review label Sep 16, 2023

@ericstjericstj left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some perf impact due do the added reflection step to check attributes on constructor parameters. The result of ActivatorUtilities.CreateFactory is typically only called once per type and then cached by the application, so it should not have an impact too big.

I see @steveharter has reviewed this so I trust he's weighed in on the perf risk. I see our benchmarks also treat CreateFactory as something called once: https://github.com/dotnet/performance/blob/6cf8107895d5374c21983dd7ad09f711b389f247/src/benchmarks/micro/libraries/Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection/ActivatorUtilitiesBenchmark.cs#L54-L57
Both the reflection and Linq.Expressions implementations of CreateFactory are already very heavy -> so I agree that this is a low risk.

Approved as this is a blocking issue in a new 8.0 feature. @artl93 please review.

@artl93artl93 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

M2 approved.

@artl93artl93 added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Sep 16, 2023
@ericstj
ericstj merged commit c7252a3 into release/8.0Sep 16, 2023
@jkotas
jkotas deleted the backport/pr-92082-to-release/8.0 branch September 16, 2023 13:18
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2023
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 16, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@ericstj@artl93@steveharter@benjaminpetit
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
[release/8.0] Fix support of FromKeyedServicesAttribute in ActivatorUtilities.CreateFactory by github-actions[bot] · Pull Request #92144 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

[release/8.0] Fix support of FromKeyedServicesAttribute in ActivatorUtilities.CreateFactory - #92144

Merged
ericstj merged 2 commits into
release/8.0from
backport/pr-92082-to-release/8.0
Sep 16, 2023
Merged

[release/8.0] Fix support of FromKeyedServicesAttribute in ActivatorUtilities.CreateFactory#92144
ericstj merged 2 commits into
release/8.0from
backport/pr-92082-to-release/8.0

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Sep 15, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #92082 to release/8.0

Fixes#92076

/cc @benjaminpetit

Customer Impact

Without this fix, keyed DI does not work when using ActivatorUtilities.CreateFactory. This impact notably MVC and SignalR, and make it impossible to use keyed DI in controller and hub constructors.

Testing

Test cases added in this PR, and also manually tested that the fix works in MVC.

Risk

Some perf impact due do the added reflection step to check attributes on constructor parameters. The result of ActivatorUtilities.CreateFactory is typically only called once per type and then cached by the application, so it should not have an impact too big.

If the attribute doesn't exist, the existing logic should not have changed.

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-extensions-dependencyinjection
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Backport of #92082 to release/8.0

/cc @benjaminpetit

Customer Impact

Testing

Risk

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

Author:github-actions[bot]
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-Extensions-DependencyInjection

Milestone:-

@stevehartersteveharter added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Sep 15, 2023
@ericstjericstj added the Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review label Sep 16, 2023

@ericstjericstj left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some perf impact due do the added reflection step to check attributes on constructor parameters. The result of ActivatorUtilities.CreateFactory is typically only called once per type and then cached by the application, so it should not have an impact too big.

I see @steveharter has reviewed this so I trust he's weighed in on the perf risk. I see our benchmarks also treat CreateFactory as something called once: https://github.com/dotnet/performance/blob/6cf8107895d5374c21983dd7ad09f711b389f247/src/benchmarks/micro/libraries/Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection/ActivatorUtilitiesBenchmark.cs#L54-L57
Both the reflection and Linq.Expressions implementations of CreateFactory are already very heavy -> so I agree that this is a low risk.

Approved as this is a blocking issue in a new 8.0 feature. @artl93 please review.

@artl93artl93 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

M2 approved.

@artl93artl93 added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Sep 16, 2023
@ericstj
ericstj merged commit c7252a3 into release/8.0Sep 16, 2023
@jkotas
jkotas deleted the backport/pr-92082-to-release/8.0 branch September 16, 2023 13:18
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2023
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 16, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@ericstj@artl93@steveharter@benjaminpetit
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' [release/8.0] Fix support of FromKeyedServicesAttribute in ActivatorUtilities.CreateFactory by github-actions[bot] · Pull Request #92144 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

[release/8.0] Fix support of FromKeyedServicesAttribute in ActivatorUtilities.CreateFactory - #92144

Merged
ericstj merged 2 commits into
release/8.0from
backport/pr-92082-to-release/8.0
Sep 16, 2023
Merged

[release/8.0] Fix support of FromKeyedServicesAttribute in ActivatorUtilities.CreateFactory#92144
ericstj merged 2 commits into
release/8.0from
backport/pr-92082-to-release/8.0

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Sep 15, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #92082 to release/8.0

Fixes#92076

/cc @benjaminpetit

Customer Impact

Without this fix, keyed DI does not work when using ActivatorUtilities.CreateFactory. This impact notably MVC and SignalR, and make it impossible to use keyed DI in controller and hub constructors.

Testing

Test cases added in this PR, and also manually tested that the fix works in MVC.

Risk

Some perf impact due do the added reflection step to check attributes on constructor parameters. The result of ActivatorUtilities.CreateFactory is typically only called once per type and then cached by the application, so it should not have an impact too big.

If the attribute doesn't exist, the existing logic should not have changed.

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-extensions-dependencyinjection
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Backport of #92082 to release/8.0

/cc @benjaminpetit

Customer Impact

Testing

Risk

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

Author:github-actions[bot]
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-Extensions-DependencyInjection

Milestone:-

@stevehartersteveharter added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Sep 15, 2023
@ericstjericstj added the Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review label Sep 16, 2023

@ericstjericstj left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some perf impact due do the added reflection step to check attributes on constructor parameters. The result of ActivatorUtilities.CreateFactory is typically only called once per type and then cached by the application, so it should not have an impact too big.

I see @steveharter has reviewed this so I trust he's weighed in on the perf risk. I see our benchmarks also treat CreateFactory as something called once: https://github.com/dotnet/performance/blob/6cf8107895d5374c21983dd7ad09f711b389f247/src/benchmarks/micro/libraries/Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection/ActivatorUtilitiesBenchmark.cs#L54-L57
Both the reflection and Linq.Expressions implementations of CreateFactory are already very heavy -> so I agree that this is a low risk.

Approved as this is a blocking issue in a new 8.0 feature. @artl93 please review.

@artl93artl93 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

M2 approved.

@artl93artl93 added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Sep 16, 2023
@ericstj
ericstj merged commit c7252a3 into release/8.0Sep 16, 2023
@jkotas
jkotas deleted the backport/pr-92082-to-release/8.0 branch September 16, 2023 13:18
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2023
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 16, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@ericstj@artl93@steveharter@benjaminpetit
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' [release/8.0] Fix support of FromKeyedServicesAttribute in ActivatorUtilities.CreateFactory by github-actions[bot] · Pull Request #92144 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

[release/8.0] Fix support of FromKeyedServicesAttribute in ActivatorUtilities.CreateFactory - #92144

Merged
ericstj merged 2 commits into
release/8.0from
backport/pr-92082-to-release/8.0
Sep 16, 2023
Merged

[release/8.0] Fix support of FromKeyedServicesAttribute in ActivatorUtilities.CreateFactory#92144
ericstj merged 2 commits into
release/8.0from
backport/pr-92082-to-release/8.0

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Sep 15, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #92082 to release/8.0

Fixes#92076

/cc @benjaminpetit

Customer Impact

Without this fix, keyed DI does not work when using ActivatorUtilities.CreateFactory. This impact notably MVC and SignalR, and make it impossible to use keyed DI in controller and hub constructors.

Testing

Test cases added in this PR, and also manually tested that the fix works in MVC.

Risk

Some perf impact due do the added reflection step to check attributes on constructor parameters. The result of ActivatorUtilities.CreateFactory is typically only called once per type and then cached by the application, so it should not have an impact too big.

If the attribute doesn't exist, the existing logic should not have changed.

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-extensions-dependencyinjection
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Backport of #92082 to release/8.0

/cc @benjaminpetit

Customer Impact

Testing

Risk

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

Author:github-actions[bot]
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-Extensions-DependencyInjection

Milestone:-

@stevehartersteveharter added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Sep 15, 2023
@ericstjericstj added the Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review label Sep 16, 2023

@ericstjericstj left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some perf impact due do the added reflection step to check attributes on constructor parameters. The result of ActivatorUtilities.CreateFactory is typically only called once per type and then cached by the application, so it should not have an impact too big.

I see @steveharter has reviewed this so I trust he's weighed in on the perf risk. I see our benchmarks also treat CreateFactory as something called once: https://github.com/dotnet/performance/blob/6cf8107895d5374c21983dd7ad09f711b389f247/src/benchmarks/micro/libraries/Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection/ActivatorUtilitiesBenchmark.cs#L54-L57
Both the reflection and Linq.Expressions implementations of CreateFactory are already very heavy -> so I agree that this is a low risk.

Approved as this is a blocking issue in a new 8.0 feature. @artl93 please review.

@artl93artl93 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

M2 approved.

@artl93artl93 added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Sep 16, 2023
@ericstj
ericstj merged commit c7252a3 into release/8.0Sep 16, 2023
@jkotas
jkotas deleted the backport/pr-92082-to-release/8.0 branch September 16, 2023 13:18
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2023
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 16, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@ericstj@artl93@steveharter@benjaminpetit
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' [release/8.0] Fix support of FromKeyedServicesAttribute in ActivatorUtilities.CreateFactory by github-actions[bot] · Pull Request #92144 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

[release/8.0] Fix support of FromKeyedServicesAttribute in ActivatorUtilities.CreateFactory - #92144

Merged
ericstj merged 2 commits into
release/8.0from
backport/pr-92082-to-release/8.0
Sep 16, 2023
Merged

[release/8.0] Fix support of FromKeyedServicesAttribute in ActivatorUtilities.CreateFactory#92144
ericstj merged 2 commits into
release/8.0from
backport/pr-92082-to-release/8.0

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Sep 15, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #92082 to release/8.0

Fixes#92076

/cc @benjaminpetit

Customer Impact

Without this fix, keyed DI does not work when using ActivatorUtilities.CreateFactory. This impact notably MVC and SignalR, and make it impossible to use keyed DI in controller and hub constructors.

Testing

Test cases added in this PR, and also manually tested that the fix works in MVC.

Risk

Some perf impact due do the added reflection step to check attributes on constructor parameters. The result of ActivatorUtilities.CreateFactory is typically only called once per type and then cached by the application, so it should not have an impact too big.

If the attribute doesn't exist, the existing logic should not have changed.

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-extensions-dependencyinjection
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Backport of #92082 to release/8.0

/cc @benjaminpetit

Customer Impact

Testing

Risk

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

Author:github-actions[bot]
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-Extensions-DependencyInjection

Milestone:-

@stevehartersteveharter added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Sep 15, 2023
@ericstjericstj added the Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review label Sep 16, 2023

@ericstjericstj left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some perf impact due do the added reflection step to check attributes on constructor parameters. The result of ActivatorUtilities.CreateFactory is typically only called once per type and then cached by the application, so it should not have an impact too big.

I see @steveharter has reviewed this so I trust he's weighed in on the perf risk. I see our benchmarks also treat CreateFactory as something called once: https://github.com/dotnet/performance/blob/6cf8107895d5374c21983dd7ad09f711b389f247/src/benchmarks/micro/libraries/Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection/ActivatorUtilitiesBenchmark.cs#L54-L57
Both the reflection and Linq.Expressions implementations of CreateFactory are already very heavy -> so I agree that this is a low risk.

Approved as this is a blocking issue in a new 8.0 feature. @artl93 please review.

@artl93artl93 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

M2 approved.

@artl93artl93 added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Sep 16, 2023
@ericstj
ericstj merged commit c7252a3 into release/8.0Sep 16, 2023
@jkotas
jkotas deleted the backport/pr-92082-to-release/8.0 branch September 16, 2023 13:18
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2023
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 16, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@ericstj@artl93@steveharter@benjaminpetit
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' [release/8.0] Fix support of FromKeyedServicesAttribute in ActivatorUtilities.CreateFactory by github-actions[bot] · Pull Request #92144 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

[release/8.0] Fix support of FromKeyedServicesAttribute in ActivatorUtilities.CreateFactory - #92144

Merged
ericstj merged 2 commits into
release/8.0from
backport/pr-92082-to-release/8.0
Sep 16, 2023
Merged

[release/8.0] Fix support of FromKeyedServicesAttribute in ActivatorUtilities.CreateFactory#92144
ericstj merged 2 commits into
release/8.0from
backport/pr-92082-to-release/8.0

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Sep 15, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #92082 to release/8.0

Fixes#92076

/cc @benjaminpetit

Customer Impact

Without this fix, keyed DI does not work when using ActivatorUtilities.CreateFactory. This impact notably MVC and SignalR, and make it impossible to use keyed DI in controller and hub constructors.

Testing

Test cases added in this PR, and also manually tested that the fix works in MVC.

Risk

Some perf impact due do the added reflection step to check attributes on constructor parameters. The result of ActivatorUtilities.CreateFactory is typically only called once per type and then cached by the application, so it should not have an impact too big.

If the attribute doesn't exist, the existing logic should not have changed.

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-extensions-dependencyinjection
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Backport of #92082 to release/8.0

/cc @benjaminpetit

Customer Impact

Testing

Risk

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

Author:github-actions[bot]
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-Extensions-DependencyInjection

Milestone:-

@stevehartersteveharter added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Sep 15, 2023
@ericstjericstj added the Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review label Sep 16, 2023

@ericstjericstj left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some perf impact due do the added reflection step to check attributes on constructor parameters. The result of ActivatorUtilities.CreateFactory is typically only called once per type and then cached by the application, so it should not have an impact too big.

I see @steveharter has reviewed this so I trust he's weighed in on the perf risk. I see our benchmarks also treat CreateFactory as something called once: https://github.com/dotnet/performance/blob/6cf8107895d5374c21983dd7ad09f711b389f247/src/benchmarks/micro/libraries/Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection/ActivatorUtilitiesBenchmark.cs#L54-L57
Both the reflection and Linq.Expressions implementations of CreateFactory are already very heavy -> so I agree that this is a low risk.

Approved as this is a blocking issue in a new 8.0 feature. @artl93 please review.

@artl93artl93 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

M2 approved.

@artl93artl93 added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Sep 16, 2023
@ericstj
ericstj merged commit c7252a3 into release/8.0Sep 16, 2023
@jkotas
jkotas deleted the backport/pr-92082-to-release/8.0 branch September 16, 2023 13:18
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2023
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 16, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@ericstj@artl93@steveharter@benjaminpetit
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' [release/8.0] Fix support of FromKeyedServicesAttribute in ActivatorUtilities.CreateFactory by github-actions[bot] · Pull Request #92144 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

[release/8.0] Fix support of FromKeyedServicesAttribute in ActivatorUtilities.CreateFactory - #92144

Merged
ericstj merged 2 commits into
release/8.0from
backport/pr-92082-to-release/8.0
Sep 16, 2023
Merged

[release/8.0] Fix support of FromKeyedServicesAttribute in ActivatorUtilities.CreateFactory#92144
ericstj merged 2 commits into
release/8.0from
backport/pr-92082-to-release/8.0

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Sep 15, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #92082 to release/8.0

Fixes#92076

/cc @benjaminpetit

Customer Impact

Without this fix, keyed DI does not work when using ActivatorUtilities.CreateFactory. This impact notably MVC and SignalR, and make it impossible to use keyed DI in controller and hub constructors.

Testing

Test cases added in this PR, and also manually tested that the fix works in MVC.

Risk

Some perf impact due do the added reflection step to check attributes on constructor parameters. The result of ActivatorUtilities.CreateFactory is typically only called once per type and then cached by the application, so it should not have an impact too big.

If the attribute doesn't exist, the existing logic should not have changed.

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-extensions-dependencyinjection
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Backport of #92082 to release/8.0

/cc @benjaminpetit

Customer Impact

Testing

Risk

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

Author:github-actions[bot]
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-Extensions-DependencyInjection

Milestone:-

@stevehartersteveharter added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Sep 15, 2023
@ericstjericstj added the Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review label Sep 16, 2023

@ericstjericstj left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some perf impact due do the added reflection step to check attributes on constructor parameters. The result of ActivatorUtilities.CreateFactory is typically only called once per type and then cached by the application, so it should not have an impact too big.

I see @steveharter has reviewed this so I trust he's weighed in on the perf risk. I see our benchmarks also treat CreateFactory as something called once: https://github.com/dotnet/performance/blob/6cf8107895d5374c21983dd7ad09f711b389f247/src/benchmarks/micro/libraries/Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection/ActivatorUtilitiesBenchmark.cs#L54-L57
Both the reflection and Linq.Expressions implementations of CreateFactory are already very heavy -> so I agree that this is a low risk.

Approved as this is a blocking issue in a new 8.0 feature. @artl93 please review.

@artl93artl93 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

M2 approved.

@artl93artl93 added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Sep 16, 2023
@ericstj
ericstj merged commit c7252a3 into release/8.0Sep 16, 2023
@jkotas
jkotas deleted the backport/pr-92082-to-release/8.0 branch September 16, 2023 13:18
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2023
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 16, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@ericstj@artl93@steveharter@benjaminpetit
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); [release/8.0] Fix support of FromKeyedServicesAttribute in ActivatorUtilities.CreateFactory by github-actions[bot] · Pull Request #92144 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

[release/8.0] Fix support of FromKeyedServicesAttribute in ActivatorUtilities.CreateFactory - #92144

Merged
ericstj merged 2 commits into
release/8.0from
backport/pr-92082-to-release/8.0
Sep 16, 2023
Merged

[release/8.0] Fix support of FromKeyedServicesAttribute in ActivatorUtilities.CreateFactory#92144
ericstj merged 2 commits into
release/8.0from
backport/pr-92082-to-release/8.0

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Sep 15, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #92082 to release/8.0

Fixes#92076

/cc @benjaminpetit

Customer Impact

Without this fix, keyed DI does not work when using ActivatorUtilities.CreateFactory. This impact notably MVC and SignalR, and make it impossible to use keyed DI in controller and hub constructors.

Testing

Test cases added in this PR, and also manually tested that the fix works in MVC.

Risk

Some perf impact due do the added reflection step to check attributes on constructor parameters. The result of ActivatorUtilities.CreateFactory is typically only called once per type and then cached by the application, so it should not have an impact too big.

If the attribute doesn't exist, the existing logic should not have changed.

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-extensions-dependencyinjection
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Backport of #92082 to release/8.0

/cc @benjaminpetit

Customer Impact

Testing

Risk

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

Author:github-actions[bot]
Assignees:-
Labels:

area-Extensions-DependencyInjection

Milestone:-

@stevehartersteveharter added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Sep 15, 2023
@ericstjericstj added the Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review label Sep 16, 2023

@ericstjericstj left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some perf impact due do the added reflection step to check attributes on constructor parameters. The result of ActivatorUtilities.CreateFactory is typically only called once per type and then cached by the application, so it should not have an impact too big.

I see @steveharter has reviewed this so I trust he's weighed in on the perf risk. I see our benchmarks also treat CreateFactory as something called once: https://github.com/dotnet/performance/blob/6cf8107895d5374c21983dd7ad09f711b389f247/src/benchmarks/micro/libraries/Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection/ActivatorUtilitiesBenchmark.cs#L54-L57
Both the reflection and Linq.Expressions implementations of CreateFactory are already very heavy -> so I agree that this is a low risk.

Approved as this is a blocking issue in a new 8.0 feature. @artl93 please review.

@artl93artl93 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

M2 approved.

@artl93artl93 added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Sep 16, 2023
@ericstj
ericstj merged commit c7252a3 into release/8.0Sep 16, 2023
@jkotas
jkotas deleted the backport/pr-92082-to-release/8.0 branch September 16, 2023 13:18
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2023
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 16, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@ericstj@artl93@steveharter@benjaminpetit