Skip to content

[release/8.0-rc2] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetype - #92494

Merged
carlossanlop merged 4 commits into
release/8.0-rc2from
backport/pr-92447-to-release/8.0
Sep 23, 2023
Merged

[release/8.0-rc2] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetype#92494
carlossanlop merged 4 commits into
release/8.0-rc2from
backport/pr-92447-to-release/8.0

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Sep 22, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #92447 to release/8.0

/cc @AaronRobinsonMSFT@elinor-fung@jkoritzinsky@JeremyKuhne@lonitra

Customer Impact

This is a regression from .NET Framework.
The current behavior has existed since IDispatch was introduced into .NET Core. This was discovered in WinForms during testing using CsWin32 generated COM interfaces.

Testing

Added tests for the current behavior.

Risk

Minimal. This is enabling a narrow feature that has been broken since .NET Core 3.0. This code path is also limited to IDispatch​ scenarios.

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Sep 22, 2023
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT added the Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review label Sep 22, 2023

@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approved. we will take for consideration in RC2

@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@AaronRobinsonMSFT this is targeting release/8.0, which represents RTM. If your intention is to target RC2, please retarget the branch by editing the PR title. Make sure no spurious commits get added unexpectedly when retargeting branch. Today EOD is the deadline for merging RC2 backports.

@AaronRobinsonMSFT
AaronRobinsonMSFT changed the base branch from release/8.0 to release/8.0-rc2September 22, 2023 20:40
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT changed the title [release/8.0] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetype[release/8.0-rc2] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetypeSep 22, 2023
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT changed the title [release/8.0-rc2] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetype[release/8.0] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetypeSep 22, 2023
This is a regression from .NET Framework.
The current behavior has existed since
IDispatch was introduced into .NET Core.
Added tests for the current behavior.
@AaronRobinsonMSFT
AaronRobinsonMSFTforce-pushed the backport/pr-92447-to-release/8.0 branch from 845d1a2 to 1507ca8CompareSeptember 22, 2023 20:45
@carlossanlopcarlossanlop changed the title [release/8.0] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetype[release/8.0-rc2] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetypeSep 22, 2023
@radical
radical removed their request for review September 22, 2023 20:47
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Sep 22, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop merged commit 1e50b05 into release/8.0-rc2Sep 23, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop deleted the backport/pr-92447-to-release/8.0 branch September 23, 2023 02:05
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2023
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 23, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Interop-coreclrServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@carlossanlop@jkoritzinsky@jeffschwMSFT@AaronRobinsonMSFT
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
[release/8.0-rc2] `IDispatch` should accept `HRESULT` as valuetype by github-actions[bot] · Pull Request #92494 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

[release/8.0-rc2] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetype - #92494

Merged
carlossanlop merged 4 commits into
release/8.0-rc2from
backport/pr-92447-to-release/8.0
Sep 23, 2023
Merged

[release/8.0-rc2] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetype#92494
carlossanlop merged 4 commits into
release/8.0-rc2from
backport/pr-92447-to-release/8.0

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Sep 22, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #92447 to release/8.0

/cc @AaronRobinsonMSFT@elinor-fung@jkoritzinsky@JeremyKuhne@lonitra

Customer Impact

This is a regression from .NET Framework.
The current behavior has existed since IDispatch was introduced into .NET Core. This was discovered in WinForms during testing using CsWin32 generated COM interfaces.

Testing

Added tests for the current behavior.

Risk

Minimal. This is enabling a narrow feature that has been broken since .NET Core 3.0. This code path is also limited to IDispatch​ scenarios.

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Sep 22, 2023
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT added the Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review label Sep 22, 2023

@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approved. we will take for consideration in RC2

@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@AaronRobinsonMSFT this is targeting release/8.0, which represents RTM. If your intention is to target RC2, please retarget the branch by editing the PR title. Make sure no spurious commits get added unexpectedly when retargeting branch. Today EOD is the deadline for merging RC2 backports.

@AaronRobinsonMSFT
AaronRobinsonMSFT changed the base branch from release/8.0 to release/8.0-rc2September 22, 2023 20:40
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT changed the title [release/8.0] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetype[release/8.0-rc2] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetypeSep 22, 2023
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT changed the title [release/8.0-rc2] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetype[release/8.0] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetypeSep 22, 2023
This is a regression from .NET Framework.
The current behavior has existed since
IDispatch was introduced into .NET Core.
Added tests for the current behavior.
@AaronRobinsonMSFT
AaronRobinsonMSFTforce-pushed the backport/pr-92447-to-release/8.0 branch from 845d1a2 to 1507ca8CompareSeptember 22, 2023 20:45
@carlossanlopcarlossanlop changed the title [release/8.0] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetype[release/8.0-rc2] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetypeSep 22, 2023
@radical
radical removed their request for review September 22, 2023 20:47
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Sep 22, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop merged commit 1e50b05 into release/8.0-rc2Sep 23, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop deleted the backport/pr-92447-to-release/8.0 branch September 23, 2023 02:05
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2023
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 23, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Interop-coreclrServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@carlossanlop@jkoritzinsky@jeffschwMSFT@AaronRobinsonMSFT
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' [release/8.0-rc2] `IDispatch` should accept `HRESULT` as valuetype by github-actions[bot] · Pull Request #92494 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

[release/8.0-rc2] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetype - #92494

Merged
carlossanlop merged 4 commits into
release/8.0-rc2from
backport/pr-92447-to-release/8.0
Sep 23, 2023
Merged

[release/8.0-rc2] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetype#92494
carlossanlop merged 4 commits into
release/8.0-rc2from
backport/pr-92447-to-release/8.0

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Sep 22, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #92447 to release/8.0

/cc @AaronRobinsonMSFT@elinor-fung@jkoritzinsky@JeremyKuhne@lonitra

Customer Impact

This is a regression from .NET Framework.
The current behavior has existed since IDispatch was introduced into .NET Core. This was discovered in WinForms during testing using CsWin32 generated COM interfaces.

Testing

Added tests for the current behavior.

Risk

Minimal. This is enabling a narrow feature that has been broken since .NET Core 3.0. This code path is also limited to IDispatch​ scenarios.

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Sep 22, 2023
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT added the Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review label Sep 22, 2023

@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approved. we will take for consideration in RC2

@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@AaronRobinsonMSFT this is targeting release/8.0, which represents RTM. If your intention is to target RC2, please retarget the branch by editing the PR title. Make sure no spurious commits get added unexpectedly when retargeting branch. Today EOD is the deadline for merging RC2 backports.

@AaronRobinsonMSFT
AaronRobinsonMSFT changed the base branch from release/8.0 to release/8.0-rc2September 22, 2023 20:40
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT changed the title [release/8.0] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetype[release/8.0-rc2] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetypeSep 22, 2023
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT changed the title [release/8.0-rc2] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetype[release/8.0] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetypeSep 22, 2023
This is a regression from .NET Framework.
The current behavior has existed since
IDispatch was introduced into .NET Core.
Added tests for the current behavior.
@AaronRobinsonMSFT
AaronRobinsonMSFTforce-pushed the backport/pr-92447-to-release/8.0 branch from 845d1a2 to 1507ca8CompareSeptember 22, 2023 20:45
@carlossanlopcarlossanlop changed the title [release/8.0] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetype[release/8.0-rc2] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetypeSep 22, 2023
@radical
radical removed their request for review September 22, 2023 20:47
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Sep 22, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop merged commit 1e50b05 into release/8.0-rc2Sep 23, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop deleted the backport/pr-92447-to-release/8.0 branch September 23, 2023 02:05
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2023
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 23, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Interop-coreclrServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@carlossanlop@jkoritzinsky@jeffschwMSFT@AaronRobinsonMSFT
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' [release/8.0-rc2] `IDispatch` should accept `HRESULT` as valuetype by github-actions[bot] · Pull Request #92494 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

[release/8.0-rc2] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetype - #92494

Merged
carlossanlop merged 4 commits into
release/8.0-rc2from
backport/pr-92447-to-release/8.0
Sep 23, 2023
Merged

[release/8.0-rc2] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetype#92494
carlossanlop merged 4 commits into
release/8.0-rc2from
backport/pr-92447-to-release/8.0

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Sep 22, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #92447 to release/8.0

/cc @AaronRobinsonMSFT@elinor-fung@jkoritzinsky@JeremyKuhne@lonitra

Customer Impact

This is a regression from .NET Framework.
The current behavior has existed since IDispatch was introduced into .NET Core. This was discovered in WinForms during testing using CsWin32 generated COM interfaces.

Testing

Added tests for the current behavior.

Risk

Minimal. This is enabling a narrow feature that has been broken since .NET Core 3.0. This code path is also limited to IDispatch​ scenarios.

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Sep 22, 2023
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT added the Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review label Sep 22, 2023

@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approved. we will take for consideration in RC2

@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@AaronRobinsonMSFT this is targeting release/8.0, which represents RTM. If your intention is to target RC2, please retarget the branch by editing the PR title. Make sure no spurious commits get added unexpectedly when retargeting branch. Today EOD is the deadline for merging RC2 backports.

@AaronRobinsonMSFT
AaronRobinsonMSFT changed the base branch from release/8.0 to release/8.0-rc2September 22, 2023 20:40
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT changed the title [release/8.0] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetype[release/8.0-rc2] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetypeSep 22, 2023
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT changed the title [release/8.0-rc2] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetype[release/8.0] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetypeSep 22, 2023
This is a regression from .NET Framework.
The current behavior has existed since
IDispatch was introduced into .NET Core.
Added tests for the current behavior.
@AaronRobinsonMSFT
AaronRobinsonMSFTforce-pushed the backport/pr-92447-to-release/8.0 branch from 845d1a2 to 1507ca8CompareSeptember 22, 2023 20:45
@carlossanlopcarlossanlop changed the title [release/8.0] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetype[release/8.0-rc2] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetypeSep 22, 2023
@radical
radical removed their request for review September 22, 2023 20:47
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Sep 22, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop merged commit 1e50b05 into release/8.0-rc2Sep 23, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop deleted the backport/pr-92447-to-release/8.0 branch September 23, 2023 02:05
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2023
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 23, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Interop-coreclrServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@carlossanlop@jkoritzinsky@jeffschwMSFT@AaronRobinsonMSFT
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' [release/8.0-rc2] `IDispatch` should accept `HRESULT` as valuetype by github-actions[bot] · Pull Request #92494 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

[release/8.0-rc2] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetype - #92494

Merged
carlossanlop merged 4 commits into
release/8.0-rc2from
backport/pr-92447-to-release/8.0
Sep 23, 2023
Merged

[release/8.0-rc2] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetype#92494
carlossanlop merged 4 commits into
release/8.0-rc2from
backport/pr-92447-to-release/8.0

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Sep 22, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #92447 to release/8.0

/cc @AaronRobinsonMSFT@elinor-fung@jkoritzinsky@JeremyKuhne@lonitra

Customer Impact

This is a regression from .NET Framework.
The current behavior has existed since IDispatch was introduced into .NET Core. This was discovered in WinForms during testing using CsWin32 generated COM interfaces.

Testing

Added tests for the current behavior.

Risk

Minimal. This is enabling a narrow feature that has been broken since .NET Core 3.0. This code path is also limited to IDispatch​ scenarios.

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Sep 22, 2023
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT added the Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review label Sep 22, 2023

@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approved. we will take for consideration in RC2

@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@AaronRobinsonMSFT this is targeting release/8.0, which represents RTM. If your intention is to target RC2, please retarget the branch by editing the PR title. Make sure no spurious commits get added unexpectedly when retargeting branch. Today EOD is the deadline for merging RC2 backports.

@AaronRobinsonMSFT
AaronRobinsonMSFT changed the base branch from release/8.0 to release/8.0-rc2September 22, 2023 20:40
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT changed the title [release/8.0] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetype[release/8.0-rc2] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetypeSep 22, 2023
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT changed the title [release/8.0-rc2] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetype[release/8.0] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetypeSep 22, 2023
This is a regression from .NET Framework.
The current behavior has existed since
IDispatch was introduced into .NET Core.
Added tests for the current behavior.
@AaronRobinsonMSFT
AaronRobinsonMSFTforce-pushed the backport/pr-92447-to-release/8.0 branch from 845d1a2 to 1507ca8CompareSeptember 22, 2023 20:45
@carlossanlopcarlossanlop changed the title [release/8.0] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetype[release/8.0-rc2] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetypeSep 22, 2023
@radical
radical removed their request for review September 22, 2023 20:47
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Sep 22, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop merged commit 1e50b05 into release/8.0-rc2Sep 23, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop deleted the backport/pr-92447-to-release/8.0 branch September 23, 2023 02:05
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2023
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 23, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Interop-coreclrServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@carlossanlop@jkoritzinsky@jeffschwMSFT@AaronRobinsonMSFT
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' [release/8.0-rc2] `IDispatch` should accept `HRESULT` as valuetype by github-actions[bot] · Pull Request #92494 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

[release/8.0-rc2] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetype - #92494

Merged
carlossanlop merged 4 commits into
release/8.0-rc2from
backport/pr-92447-to-release/8.0
Sep 23, 2023
Merged

[release/8.0-rc2] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetype#92494
carlossanlop merged 4 commits into
release/8.0-rc2from
backport/pr-92447-to-release/8.0

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Sep 22, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #92447 to release/8.0

/cc @AaronRobinsonMSFT@elinor-fung@jkoritzinsky@JeremyKuhne@lonitra

Customer Impact

This is a regression from .NET Framework.
The current behavior has existed since IDispatch was introduced into .NET Core. This was discovered in WinForms during testing using CsWin32 generated COM interfaces.

Testing

Added tests for the current behavior.

Risk

Minimal. This is enabling a narrow feature that has been broken since .NET Core 3.0. This code path is also limited to IDispatch​ scenarios.

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Sep 22, 2023
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT added the Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review label Sep 22, 2023

@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approved. we will take for consideration in RC2

@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@AaronRobinsonMSFT this is targeting release/8.0, which represents RTM. If your intention is to target RC2, please retarget the branch by editing the PR title. Make sure no spurious commits get added unexpectedly when retargeting branch. Today EOD is the deadline for merging RC2 backports.

@AaronRobinsonMSFT
AaronRobinsonMSFT changed the base branch from release/8.0 to release/8.0-rc2September 22, 2023 20:40
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT changed the title [release/8.0] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetype[release/8.0-rc2] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetypeSep 22, 2023
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT changed the title [release/8.0-rc2] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetype[release/8.0] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetypeSep 22, 2023
This is a regression from .NET Framework.
The current behavior has existed since
IDispatch was introduced into .NET Core.
Added tests for the current behavior.
@AaronRobinsonMSFT
AaronRobinsonMSFTforce-pushed the backport/pr-92447-to-release/8.0 branch from 845d1a2 to 1507ca8CompareSeptember 22, 2023 20:45
@carlossanlopcarlossanlop changed the title [release/8.0] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetype[release/8.0-rc2] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetypeSep 22, 2023
@radical
radical removed their request for review September 22, 2023 20:47
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Sep 22, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop merged commit 1e50b05 into release/8.0-rc2Sep 23, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop deleted the backport/pr-92447-to-release/8.0 branch September 23, 2023 02:05
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2023
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 23, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Interop-coreclrServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@carlossanlop@jkoritzinsky@jeffschwMSFT@AaronRobinsonMSFT
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' [release/8.0-rc2] `IDispatch` should accept `HRESULT` as valuetype by github-actions[bot] · Pull Request #92494 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

[release/8.0-rc2] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetype - #92494

Merged
carlossanlop merged 4 commits into
release/8.0-rc2from
backport/pr-92447-to-release/8.0
Sep 23, 2023
Merged

[release/8.0-rc2] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetype#92494
carlossanlop merged 4 commits into
release/8.0-rc2from
backport/pr-92447-to-release/8.0

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Sep 22, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #92447 to release/8.0

/cc @AaronRobinsonMSFT@elinor-fung@jkoritzinsky@JeremyKuhne@lonitra

Customer Impact

This is a regression from .NET Framework.
The current behavior has existed since IDispatch was introduced into .NET Core. This was discovered in WinForms during testing using CsWin32 generated COM interfaces.

Testing

Added tests for the current behavior.

Risk

Minimal. This is enabling a narrow feature that has been broken since .NET Core 3.0. This code path is also limited to IDispatch​ scenarios.

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Sep 22, 2023
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT added the Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review label Sep 22, 2023

@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approved. we will take for consideration in RC2

@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@AaronRobinsonMSFT this is targeting release/8.0, which represents RTM. If your intention is to target RC2, please retarget the branch by editing the PR title. Make sure no spurious commits get added unexpectedly when retargeting branch. Today EOD is the deadline for merging RC2 backports.

@AaronRobinsonMSFT
AaronRobinsonMSFT changed the base branch from release/8.0 to release/8.0-rc2September 22, 2023 20:40
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT changed the title [release/8.0] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetype[release/8.0-rc2] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetypeSep 22, 2023
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT changed the title [release/8.0-rc2] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetype[release/8.0] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetypeSep 22, 2023
This is a regression from .NET Framework.
The current behavior has existed since
IDispatch was introduced into .NET Core.
Added tests for the current behavior.
@AaronRobinsonMSFT
AaronRobinsonMSFTforce-pushed the backport/pr-92447-to-release/8.0 branch from 845d1a2 to 1507ca8CompareSeptember 22, 2023 20:45
@carlossanlopcarlossanlop changed the title [release/8.0] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetype[release/8.0-rc2] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetypeSep 22, 2023
@radical
radical removed their request for review September 22, 2023 20:47
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Sep 22, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop merged commit 1e50b05 into release/8.0-rc2Sep 23, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop deleted the backport/pr-92447-to-release/8.0 branch September 23, 2023 02:05
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2023
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 23, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Interop-coreclrServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@carlossanlop@jkoritzinsky@jeffschwMSFT@AaronRobinsonMSFT
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); [release/8.0-rc2] `IDispatch` should accept `HRESULT` as valuetype by github-actions[bot] · Pull Request #92494 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub
Skip to content

[release/8.0-rc2] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetype - #92494

Merged
carlossanlop merged 4 commits into
release/8.0-rc2from
backport/pr-92447-to-release/8.0
Sep 23, 2023
Merged

[release/8.0-rc2] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetype#92494
carlossanlop merged 4 commits into
release/8.0-rc2from
backport/pr-92447-to-release/8.0

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot commented Sep 22, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #92447 to release/8.0

/cc @AaronRobinsonMSFT@elinor-fung@jkoritzinsky@JeremyKuhne@lonitra

Customer Impact

This is a regression from .NET Framework.
The current behavior has existed since IDispatch was introduced into .NET Core. This was discovered in WinForms during testing using CsWin32 generated COM interfaces.

Testing

Added tests for the current behavior.

Risk

Minimal. This is enabling a narrow feature that has been broken since .NET Core 3.0. This code path is also limited to IDispatch​ scenarios.

IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:

  • The PR target branch is release/X.0-staging, not release/X.0.

  • If the change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, you have added the necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Sep 22, 2023
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT added the Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review label Sep 22, 2023

@jeffschwMSFTjeffschwMSFT left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approved. we will take for consideration in RC2

@carlossanlop

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@AaronRobinsonMSFT this is targeting release/8.0, which represents RTM. If your intention is to target RC2, please retarget the branch by editing the PR title. Make sure no spurious commits get added unexpectedly when retargeting branch. Today EOD is the deadline for merging RC2 backports.

@AaronRobinsonMSFT
AaronRobinsonMSFT changed the base branch from release/8.0 to release/8.0-rc2September 22, 2023 20:40
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT changed the title [release/8.0] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetype[release/8.0-rc2] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetypeSep 22, 2023
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT changed the title [release/8.0-rc2] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetype[release/8.0] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetypeSep 22, 2023
This is a regression from .NET Framework.
The current behavior has existed since
IDispatch was introduced into .NET Core.
Added tests for the current behavior.
@AaronRobinsonMSFT
AaronRobinsonMSFTforce-pushed the backport/pr-92447-to-release/8.0 branch from 845d1a2 to 1507ca8CompareSeptember 22, 2023 20:45
@carlossanlopcarlossanlop changed the title [release/8.0] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetype[release/8.0-rc2] IDispatch should accept HRESULT as valuetypeSep 22, 2023
@radical
radical removed their request for review September 22, 2023 20:47
@AaronRobinsonMSFTAaronRobinsonMSFT added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Sep 22, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop merged commit 1e50b05 into release/8.0-rc2Sep 23, 2023
@carlossanlop
carlossanlop deleted the backport/pr-92447-to-release/8.0 branch September 23, 2023 02:05
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2023
@radicalradical mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2023
@ghostghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 23, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-Interop-coreclrServicing-approvedApproved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@carlossanlop@jkoritzinsky@jeffschwMSFT@AaronRobinsonMSFT