fix: ADR cleanup

[wesleytodd]

No description provided.

[ctcpip]

hmmm... hate to say it but I think we need an ADR for numbering... UUID? monotonically increasing integer starting from 1? PR number? 🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔

[wesleytodd]

I was just kidding because of our exchange, but I really do think PR number is a reasonable way. No need to go look it up when merging (and forget, like I did). At least these numbers mean something.

[ctcpip]

slight dispreference due to not knowing in advance what the PR number will be. (or guessing and risking race condition), meaning a follow-on commit will always be required

also not convinced we need numeric/symbolic identifiers at all, but I have little appetite to bikeshed this

[wesleytodd]

also not convinced we need numeric/symbolic identifiers at all, but I have little appetite to bikeshed this

Ok, you have me sold on this. I almost did this in the PR but realized that it meant the file names might become more important.

Honestly I just did this as a joke, we can even close it if we just want to let the lord of chaos reign.