fix(node-core): Align pino mechanism type with spec conventions - #19363

Merged
logaretm merged 2 commits into
developfrom
awad/fix-pino-mechanism-type
Feb 18, 2026
Merged

fix(node-core): Align pino mechanism type with spec conventions#19363
logaretm merged 2 commits into
developfrom
awad/fix-pino-mechanism-type

Conversation

@logaretm

@logaretmlogaretm commented Feb 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

In #18631 we noticed that Pino logs didn't match the mechanism types we are expecting, this PR addresses that.

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings February 17, 2026 15:29
@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Feb 17, 2026•
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Codecov Results 📊

Generated by Codecov Action

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Feb 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

node-overhead report 🧳

Note: This is a synthetic benchmark with a minimal express app and does not necessarily reflect the real-world performance impact in an application.
⚠️Warning: Base artifact is not the latest one, because the latest workflow run is not done yet. This may lead to incorrect results. Try to re-run all tests to get up to date results.

ScenarioRequests/s% of BaselinePrev. Requests/sChange %
GET Baseline9,257-10,978-16%
GET With Sentry1,60117%1,820-12%
GET With Sentry (error only)5,79463%7,536-23%
POST Baseline1,164-1,133+3%
POST With Sentry55848%579-4%
POST With Sentry (error only)1,03789%996+4%
MYSQL Baseline3,215-3,903-18%
MYSQL With Sentry42713%482-11%
MYSQL With Sentry (error only)2,58981%3,143-18%

View base workflow run

CopilotAI reviewed Feb 17, 2026
View reviewed changes

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR updates the Pino integration to align with Sentry's mechanism type conventions by changing the mechanism type from 'pino' to 'auto.log.pino'. This brings the Pino integration into consistency with other logging integrations in the codebase (Winston, Console, Consola), which all follow the 'auto.log.<logger>' naming pattern for mechanism types.

Changes:

  • Updated mechanism type in Pino integration from 'pino' to 'auto.log.pino'
  • Updated all test expectations to reflect the new mechanism type

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

FileDescription
packages/node-core/src/integrations/pino.tsChanged mechanism type to follow the auto.log.* convention
dev-packages/node-integration-tests/suites/pino/test.tsUpdated all test assertions to expect the new mechanism type

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Lms24
Lms24 approved these changes Feb 18, 2026
View reviewed changes

@Lms24Lms24 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for following up on this!

@logaretm
logaretm merged commit a06443b into developFeb 18, 2026
164 checks passed
@logaretm
logaretm deleted the awad/fix-pino-mechanism-type branch February 18, 2026 15:01
@logaretmlogaretm mentioned this pull request Feb 20, 2026
Closed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

Copilot code reviewCopilot
Copilot review effort, defaults to Lite
Applies to this pull request for everyone.Learn more about Copilot code review.
Copilot left review comments
@Lms24Lms24Lms24 approved these changes
@andreiborzaandreiborzaandreiborza approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@logaretm@Lms24@andreiborza
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

Skip to content
fix(node-core): Align pino mechanism type with spec conventions - #19363
Merged
logaretm merged 2 commits into
developfrom 
awad/fix-pino-mechanism-type
Feb 18, 2026
Merged
fix(node-core): Align pino mechanism type with spec conventions#19363
logaretm merged 2 commits into
developfrom 
awad/fix-pino-mechanism-type
Conversation
@logaretm
@logaretmlogaretm
commented
Feb 17, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
In #18631 we noticed that Pino logs didn't match the mechanism types we are expecting, this PR addresses that.
CopilotAI
review requested due to automatic review settings
February 17, 2026 15:29
@github-actions
github-actionsBot
commented
Feb 17, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Codecov Results 📊
Generated by Codecov Action
@github-actions
github-actionsBot
commented
Feb 17, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
node-overhead report 🧳
Note: This is a synthetic benchmark with a minimal express app and does not necessarily reflect the real-world performance impact in an application.
⚠️Warning: Base artifact is not the latest one, because the latest workflow run is not done yet. This may lead to incorrect results. Try to re-run all tests to get up to date results.
ScenarioRequests/s% of BaselinePrev. Requests/sChange %
GET Baseline9,257-10,978-16%
GET With Sentry1,60117%1,820-12%
GET With Sentry (error only)5,79463%7,536-23%
POST Baseline1,164-1,133+3%
POST With Sentry55848%579-4%
POST With Sentry (error only)1,03789%996+4%
MYSQL Baseline3,215-3,903-18%
MYSQL With Sentry42713%482-11%
MYSQL With Sentry (error only)2,58981%3,143-18%
View base workflow run
CopilotAI
reviewed
Feb 17, 2026
View reviewed changes
CopilotAI
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview
This PR updates the Pino integration to align with Sentry's mechanism type conventions by changing the mechanism type from 'pino' to 'auto.log.pino'. This brings the Pino integration into consistency with other logging integrations in the codebase (Winston, Console, Consola), which all follow the 'auto.log.<logger>' naming pattern for mechanism types.
Changes:
  • Updated mechanism type in Pino integration from 'pino' to 'auto.log.pino'
  • Updated all test expectations to reflect the new mechanism type
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
FileDescription
packages/node-core/src/integrations/pino.tsChanged mechanism type to follow the auto.log.* convention
dev-packages/node-integration-tests/suites/pino/test.tsUpdated all test assertions to expect the new mechanism type
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
Lms24
Lms24
approved these changes
Feb 18, 2026
View reviewed changes
@Lms24Lms24
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for following up on this!
@logaretm
logaretm
merged commit a06443b
into
developFeb 18, 2026

164 checks passed

@logaretm
logaretm
deleted the

awad/fix-pino-mechanism-type

branch
February 18, 2026 15:01
@logaretmlogaretm
mentioned this pull request
Feb 20, 2026
 Closed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

Copilot code reviewCopilot
Copilot review effort, defaults to Lite
Applies to this pull request for everyone.Learn more about Copilot code review.
Copilot left review comments
@Lms24Lms24Lms24 approved these changes
@andreiborzaandreiborzaandreiborza approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@logaretm@Lms24@andreiborza

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
fix(node-core): Align pino mechanism type with spec conventions - #19363
Merged
logaretm merged 2 commits into
developfrom 
awad/fix-pino-mechanism-type
Feb 18, 2026
Merged
fix(node-core): Align pino mechanism type with spec conventions#19363
logaretm merged 2 commits into
developfrom 
awad/fix-pino-mechanism-type
Conversation
@logaretm
@logaretmlogaretm
commented
Feb 17, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
In #18631 we noticed that Pino logs didn't match the mechanism types we are expecting, this PR addresses that.
CopilotAI
review requested due to automatic review settings
February 17, 2026 15:29
@github-actions
github-actionsBot
commented
Feb 17, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Codecov Results 📊
Generated by Codecov Action
@github-actions
github-actionsBot
commented
Feb 17, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
node-overhead report 🧳
Note: This is a synthetic benchmark with a minimal express app and does not necessarily reflect the real-world performance impact in an application.
⚠️Warning: Base artifact is not the latest one, because the latest workflow run is not done yet. This may lead to incorrect results. Try to re-run all tests to get up to date results.
ScenarioRequests/s% of BaselinePrev. Requests/sChange %
GET Baseline9,257-10,978-16%
GET With Sentry1,60117%1,820-12%
GET With Sentry (error only)5,79463%7,536-23%
POST Baseline1,164-1,133+3%
POST With Sentry55848%579-4%
POST With Sentry (error only)1,03789%996+4%
MYSQL Baseline3,215-3,903-18%
MYSQL With Sentry42713%482-11%
MYSQL With Sentry (error only)2,58981%3,143-18%
View base workflow run
CopilotAI
reviewed
Feb 17, 2026
View reviewed changes
CopilotAI
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview
This PR updates the Pino integration to align with Sentry's mechanism type conventions by changing the mechanism type from 'pino' to 'auto.log.pino'. This brings the Pino integration into consistency with other logging integrations in the codebase (Winston, Console, Consola), which all follow the 'auto.log.<logger>' naming pattern for mechanism types.
Changes:
  • Updated mechanism type in Pino integration from 'pino' to 'auto.log.pino'
  • Updated all test expectations to reflect the new mechanism type
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
FileDescription
packages/node-core/src/integrations/pino.tsChanged mechanism type to follow the auto.log.* convention
dev-packages/node-integration-tests/suites/pino/test.tsUpdated all test assertions to expect the new mechanism type
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
Lms24
Lms24
approved these changes
Feb 18, 2026
View reviewed changes
@Lms24Lms24
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for following up on this!
@logaretm
logaretm
merged commit a06443b
into
developFeb 18, 2026

164 checks passed

@logaretm
logaretm
deleted the

awad/fix-pino-mechanism-type

branch
February 18, 2026 15:01
@logaretmlogaretm
mentioned this pull request
Feb 20, 2026
 Closed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

Copilot code reviewCopilot
Copilot review effort, defaults to Lite
Applies to this pull request for everyone.Learn more about Copilot code review.
Copilot left review comments
@Lms24Lms24Lms24 approved these changes
@andreiborzaandreiborzaandreiborza approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@logaretm@Lms24@andreiborza

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
fix(node-core): Align pino mechanism type with spec conventions - #19363
Merged
logaretm merged 2 commits into
developfrom 
awad/fix-pino-mechanism-type
Feb 18, 2026
Merged
fix(node-core): Align pino mechanism type with spec conventions#19363
logaretm merged 2 commits into
developfrom 
awad/fix-pino-mechanism-type
Conversation
@logaretm
@logaretmlogaretm
commented
Feb 17, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
In #18631 we noticed that Pino logs didn't match the mechanism types we are expecting, this PR addresses that.
CopilotAI
review requested due to automatic review settings
February 17, 2026 15:29
@github-actions
github-actionsBot
commented
Feb 17, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Codecov Results 📊
Generated by Codecov Action
@github-actions
github-actionsBot
commented
Feb 17, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
node-overhead report 🧳
Note: This is a synthetic benchmark with a minimal express app and does not necessarily reflect the real-world performance impact in an application.
⚠️Warning: Base artifact is not the latest one, because the latest workflow run is not done yet. This may lead to incorrect results. Try to re-run all tests to get up to date results.
ScenarioRequests/s% of BaselinePrev. Requests/sChange %
GET Baseline9,257-10,978-16%
GET With Sentry1,60117%1,820-12%
GET With Sentry (error only)5,79463%7,536-23%
POST Baseline1,164-1,133+3%
POST With Sentry55848%579-4%
POST With Sentry (error only)1,03789%996+4%
MYSQL Baseline3,215-3,903-18%
MYSQL With Sentry42713%482-11%
MYSQL With Sentry (error only)2,58981%3,143-18%
View base workflow run
CopilotAI
reviewed
Feb 17, 2026
View reviewed changes
CopilotAI
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview
This PR updates the Pino integration to align with Sentry's mechanism type conventions by changing the mechanism type from 'pino' to 'auto.log.pino'. This brings the Pino integration into consistency with other logging integrations in the codebase (Winston, Console, Consola), which all follow the 'auto.log.<logger>' naming pattern for mechanism types.
Changes:
  • Updated mechanism type in Pino integration from 'pino' to 'auto.log.pino'
  • Updated all test expectations to reflect the new mechanism type
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
FileDescription
packages/node-core/src/integrations/pino.tsChanged mechanism type to follow the auto.log.* convention
dev-packages/node-integration-tests/suites/pino/test.tsUpdated all test assertions to expect the new mechanism type
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
Lms24
Lms24
approved these changes
Feb 18, 2026
View reviewed changes
@Lms24Lms24
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for following up on this!
@logaretm
logaretm
merged commit a06443b
into
developFeb 18, 2026

164 checks passed

@logaretm
logaretm
deleted the

awad/fix-pino-mechanism-type

branch
February 18, 2026 15:01
@logaretmlogaretm
mentioned this pull request
Feb 20, 2026
 Closed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

Copilot code reviewCopilot
Copilot review effort, defaults to Lite
Applies to this pull request for everyone.Learn more about Copilot code review.
Copilot left review comments
@Lms24Lms24Lms24 approved these changes
@andreiborzaandreiborzaandreiborza approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@logaretm@Lms24@andreiborza

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

Skip to content
fix(node-core): Align pino mechanism type with spec conventions - #19363
Merged
logaretm merged 2 commits into
developfrom 
awad/fix-pino-mechanism-type
Feb 18, 2026
Merged
fix(node-core): Align pino mechanism type with spec conventions#19363
logaretm merged 2 commits into
developfrom 
awad/fix-pino-mechanism-type
Conversation
@logaretm
@logaretmlogaretm
commented
Feb 17, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
In #18631 we noticed that Pino logs didn't match the mechanism types we are expecting, this PR addresses that.
CopilotAI
review requested due to automatic review settings
February 17, 2026 15:29
@github-actions
github-actionsBot
commented
Feb 17, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Codecov Results 📊
Generated by Codecov Action
@github-actions
github-actionsBot
commented
Feb 17, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
node-overhead report 🧳
Note: This is a synthetic benchmark with a minimal express app and does not necessarily reflect the real-world performance impact in an application.
⚠️Warning: Base artifact is not the latest one, because the latest workflow run is not done yet. This may lead to incorrect results. Try to re-run all tests to get up to date results.
ScenarioRequests/s% of BaselinePrev. Requests/sChange %
GET Baseline9,257-10,978-16%
GET With Sentry1,60117%1,820-12%
GET With Sentry (error only)5,79463%7,536-23%
POST Baseline1,164-1,133+3%
POST With Sentry55848%579-4%
POST With Sentry (error only)1,03789%996+4%
MYSQL Baseline3,215-3,903-18%
MYSQL With Sentry42713%482-11%
MYSQL With Sentry (error only)2,58981%3,143-18%
View base workflow run
CopilotAI
reviewed
Feb 17, 2026
View reviewed changes
CopilotAI
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview
This PR updates the Pino integration to align with Sentry's mechanism type conventions by changing the mechanism type from 'pino' to 'auto.log.pino'. This brings the Pino integration into consistency with other logging integrations in the codebase (Winston, Console, Consola), which all follow the 'auto.log.<logger>' naming pattern for mechanism types.
Changes:
  • Updated mechanism type in Pino integration from 'pino' to 'auto.log.pino'
  • Updated all test expectations to reflect the new mechanism type
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
FileDescription
packages/node-core/src/integrations/pino.tsChanged mechanism type to follow the auto.log.* convention
dev-packages/node-integration-tests/suites/pino/test.tsUpdated all test assertions to expect the new mechanism type
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
Lms24
Lms24
approved these changes
Feb 18, 2026
View reviewed changes
@Lms24Lms24
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for following up on this!
@logaretm
logaretm
merged commit a06443b
into
developFeb 18, 2026

164 checks passed

@logaretm
logaretm
deleted the

awad/fix-pino-mechanism-type

branch
February 18, 2026 15:01
@logaretmlogaretm
mentioned this pull request
Feb 20, 2026
 Closed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

Copilot code reviewCopilot
Copilot review effort, defaults to Lite
Applies to this pull request for everyone.Learn more about Copilot code review.
Copilot left review comments
@Lms24Lms24Lms24 approved these changes
@andreiborzaandreiborzaandreiborza approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@logaretm@Lms24@andreiborza

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
fix(node-core): Align pino mechanism type with spec conventions - #19363
Merged
logaretm merged 2 commits into
developfrom 
awad/fix-pino-mechanism-type
Feb 18, 2026
Merged
fix(node-core): Align pino mechanism type with spec conventions#19363
logaretm merged 2 commits into
developfrom 
awad/fix-pino-mechanism-type
Conversation
@logaretm
@logaretmlogaretm
commented
Feb 17, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
In #18631 we noticed that Pino logs didn't match the mechanism types we are expecting, this PR addresses that.
CopilotAI
review requested due to automatic review settings
February 17, 2026 15:29
@github-actions
github-actionsBot
commented
Feb 17, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Codecov Results 📊
Generated by Codecov Action
@github-actions
github-actionsBot
commented
Feb 17, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
node-overhead report 🧳
Note: This is a synthetic benchmark with a minimal express app and does not necessarily reflect the real-world performance impact in an application.
⚠️Warning: Base artifact is not the latest one, because the latest workflow run is not done yet. This may lead to incorrect results. Try to re-run all tests to get up to date results.
ScenarioRequests/s% of BaselinePrev. Requests/sChange %
GET Baseline9,257-10,978-16%
GET With Sentry1,60117%1,820-12%
GET With Sentry (error only)5,79463%7,536-23%
POST Baseline1,164-1,133+3%
POST With Sentry55848%579-4%
POST With Sentry (error only)1,03789%996+4%
MYSQL Baseline3,215-3,903-18%
MYSQL With Sentry42713%482-11%
MYSQL With Sentry (error only)2,58981%3,143-18%
View base workflow run
CopilotAI
reviewed
Feb 17, 2026
View reviewed changes
CopilotAI
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview
This PR updates the Pino integration to align with Sentry's mechanism type conventions by changing the mechanism type from 'pino' to 'auto.log.pino'. This brings the Pino integration into consistency with other logging integrations in the codebase (Winston, Console, Consola), which all follow the 'auto.log.<logger>' naming pattern for mechanism types.
Changes:
  • Updated mechanism type in Pino integration from 'pino' to 'auto.log.pino'
  • Updated all test expectations to reflect the new mechanism type
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
FileDescription
packages/node-core/src/integrations/pino.tsChanged mechanism type to follow the auto.log.* convention
dev-packages/node-integration-tests/suites/pino/test.tsUpdated all test assertions to expect the new mechanism type
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
Lms24
Lms24
approved these changes
Feb 18, 2026
View reviewed changes
@Lms24Lms24
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for following up on this!
@logaretm
logaretm
merged commit a06443b
into
developFeb 18, 2026

164 checks passed

@logaretm
logaretm
deleted the

awad/fix-pino-mechanism-type

branch
February 18, 2026 15:01
@logaretmlogaretm
mentioned this pull request
Feb 20, 2026
 Closed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

Copilot code reviewCopilot
Copilot review effort, defaults to Lite
Applies to this pull request for everyone.Learn more about Copilot code review.
Copilot left review comments
@Lms24Lms24Lms24 approved these changes
@andreiborzaandreiborzaandreiborza approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@logaretm@Lms24@andreiborza

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
fix(node-core): Align pino mechanism type with spec conventions - #19363
Merged
logaretm merged 2 commits into
developfrom 
awad/fix-pino-mechanism-type
Feb 18, 2026
Merged
fix(node-core): Align pino mechanism type with spec conventions#19363
logaretm merged 2 commits into
developfrom 
awad/fix-pino-mechanism-type
Conversation
@logaretm
@logaretmlogaretm
commented
Feb 17, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
In #18631 we noticed that Pino logs didn't match the mechanism types we are expecting, this PR addresses that.
CopilotAI
review requested due to automatic review settings
February 17, 2026 15:29
@github-actions
github-actionsBot
commented
Feb 17, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Codecov Results 📊
Generated by Codecov Action
@github-actions
github-actionsBot
commented
Feb 17, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
node-overhead report 🧳
Note: This is a synthetic benchmark with a minimal express app and does not necessarily reflect the real-world performance impact in an application.
⚠️Warning: Base artifact is not the latest one, because the latest workflow run is not done yet. This may lead to incorrect results. Try to re-run all tests to get up to date results.
ScenarioRequests/s% of BaselinePrev. Requests/sChange %
GET Baseline9,257-10,978-16%
GET With Sentry1,60117%1,820-12%
GET With Sentry (error only)5,79463%7,536-23%
POST Baseline1,164-1,133+3%
POST With Sentry55848%579-4%
POST With Sentry (error only)1,03789%996+4%
MYSQL Baseline3,215-3,903-18%
MYSQL With Sentry42713%482-11%
MYSQL With Sentry (error only)2,58981%3,143-18%
View base workflow run
CopilotAI
reviewed
Feb 17, 2026
View reviewed changes
CopilotAI
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview
This PR updates the Pino integration to align with Sentry's mechanism type conventions by changing the mechanism type from 'pino' to 'auto.log.pino'. This brings the Pino integration into consistency with other logging integrations in the codebase (Winston, Console, Consola), which all follow the 'auto.log.<logger>' naming pattern for mechanism types.
Changes:
  • Updated mechanism type in Pino integration from 'pino' to 'auto.log.pino'
  • Updated all test expectations to reflect the new mechanism type
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
FileDescription
packages/node-core/src/integrations/pino.tsChanged mechanism type to follow the auto.log.* convention
dev-packages/node-integration-tests/suites/pino/test.tsUpdated all test assertions to expect the new mechanism type
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
Lms24
Lms24
approved these changes
Feb 18, 2026
View reviewed changes
@Lms24Lms24
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for following up on this!
@logaretm
logaretm
merged commit a06443b
into
developFeb 18, 2026

164 checks passed

@logaretm
logaretm
deleted the

awad/fix-pino-mechanism-type

branch
February 18, 2026 15:01
@logaretmlogaretm
mentioned this pull request
Feb 20, 2026
 Closed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

Copilot code reviewCopilot
Copilot review effort, defaults to Lite
Applies to this pull request for everyone.Learn more about Copilot code review.
Copilot left review comments
@Lms24Lms24Lms24 approved these changes
@andreiborzaandreiborzaandreiborza approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@logaretm@Lms24@andreiborza

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

Skip to content
fix(node-core): Align pino mechanism type with spec conventions - #19363
Merged
logaretm merged 2 commits into
developfrom 
awad/fix-pino-mechanism-type
Feb 18, 2026
Merged
fix(node-core): Align pino mechanism type with spec conventions#19363
logaretm merged 2 commits into
developfrom 
awad/fix-pino-mechanism-type
Conversation
@logaretm
@logaretmlogaretm
commented
Feb 17, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
In #18631 we noticed that Pino logs didn't match the mechanism types we are expecting, this PR addresses that.
CopilotAI
review requested due to automatic review settings
February 17, 2026 15:29
@github-actions
github-actionsBot
commented
Feb 17, 2026•

edited

Loading

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Codecov Results 📊
Generated by Codecov Action
@github-actions
github-actionsBot
commented
Feb 17, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
node-overhead report 🧳
Note: This is a synthetic benchmark with a minimal express app and does not necessarily reflect the real-world performance impact in an application.
⚠️Warning: Base artifact is not the latest one, because the latest workflow run is not done yet. This may lead to incorrect results. Try to re-run all tests to get up to date results.
ScenarioRequests/s% of BaselinePrev. Requests/sChange %
GET Baseline9,257-10,978-16%
GET With Sentry1,60117%1,820-12%
GET With Sentry (error only)5,79463%7,536-23%
POST Baseline1,164-1,133+3%
POST With Sentry55848%579-4%
POST With Sentry (error only)1,03789%996+4%
MYSQL Baseline3,215-3,903-18%
MYSQL With Sentry42713%482-11%
MYSQL With Sentry (error only)2,58981%3,143-18%
View base workflow run
CopilotAI
reviewed
Feb 17, 2026
View reviewed changes
CopilotAI
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview
This PR updates the Pino integration to align with Sentry's mechanism type conventions by changing the mechanism type from 'pino' to 'auto.log.pino'. This brings the Pino integration into consistency with other logging integrations in the codebase (Winston, Console, Consola), which all follow the 'auto.log.<logger>' naming pattern for mechanism types.
Changes:
  • Updated mechanism type in Pino integration from 'pino' to 'auto.log.pino'
  • Updated all test expectations to reflect the new mechanism type
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
FileDescription
packages/node-core/src/integrations/pino.tsChanged mechanism type to follow the auto.log.* convention
dev-packages/node-integration-tests/suites/pino/test.tsUpdated all test assertions to expect the new mechanism type
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
Lms24
Lms24
approved these changes
Feb 18, 2026
View reviewed changes
@Lms24Lms24
left a comment


Copy link


Copy Markdown

Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for following up on this!
@logaretm
logaretm
merged commit a06443b
into
developFeb 18, 2026

164 checks passed

@logaretm
logaretm
deleted the

awad/fix-pino-mechanism-type

branch
February 18, 2026 15:01
@logaretmlogaretm
mentioned this pull request
Feb 20, 2026
 Closed

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers

Copilot code reviewCopilot
Copilot review effort, defaults to Lite
Applies to this pull request for everyone.Learn more about Copilot code review.
Copilot left review comments
@Lms24Lms24Lms24 approved these changes
@andreiborzaandreiborzaandreiborza approved these changes

Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@logaretm@Lms24@andreiborza