Prepare for Payment Retries in ChannelManager - #1862

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 4 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2022-11-chanman-retries-prep
Dec 1, 2022
Merged

Prepare for Payment Retries in ChannelManager#1862
TheBlueMatt merged 4 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2022-11-chanman-retries-prep

Conversation

@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Just code moves that help us prepare for getting rid of the InvoicePayer and moving payment retries into ChannelManager, in preparation for trampoline payments.

Comment threadlightning/src/routing/router.rs
@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

After we sort out whether to make ScorerAccountingForInFlightHtlcs public I can update its methods and docs.

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Nov 18, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Base: 90.72% // Head: 91.02% // Increases project coverage by +0.30% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (70ca0d4) compared to base (8245128).
Patch coverage: 37.50% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

❗ Current head 70ca0d4 differs from pull request most recent head 3f53951. Consider uploading reports for the commit 3f53951 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1862 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.72% 91.02% +0.30% 
==========================================
Files 91 91 Lines 47896 49984 +2088 Branches 47896 49984 +2088 ==========================================
+ Hits 43453 45499 +2046 - Misses 4443 4485 +42 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
lightning-background-processor/src/lib.rs96.40% <ø> (+0.96%)⬆️
lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs89.48% <ø> (+0.21%)⬆️
lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs97.81% <ø> (+2.60%)⬆️
lightning/src/routing/router.rs90.86% <13.79%> (-0.87%)⬇️
lightning/src/routing/scoring.rs96.92% <100.00%> (+0.03%)⬆️
lightning-net-tokio/src/lib.rs76.73% <0.00%> (-0.31%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/peer_channel_encryptor.rs93.38% <0.00%> (-0.25%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs99.44% <0.00%> (-0.12%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs97.07% <0.00%> (-0.04%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs86.31% <0.00%> (-0.03%)⬇️
... and 6 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@valentinewallace
valentinewallaceforce-pushed the 2022-11-chanman-retries-prep branch 2 times, most recently from 94fcf48 to ea0c8cbCompareNovember 21, 2022 23:35
@valentinewallace
valentinewallace marked this pull request as ready for review November 22, 2022 00:02
@valentinewallace
valentinewallaceforce-pushed the 2022-11-chanman-retries-prep branch 5 times, most recently from e38cd12 to 59510b9CompareNovember 22, 2022 16:12
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Hmm, is there some way to retain the find_route_with_id logic here? Even if we move retries to ChannelManager we still want to pass the PaymentId into the router, I think.

@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Hmm, is there some way to retain the find_route_with_id logic here? Even if we move retries to ChannelManager we still want to pass the PaymentId into the router, I think.

For sure, how about an additional Router method with a default implementation?

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

That seems reasonable to me.

@valentinewallace
valentinewallaceforce-pushed the 2022-11-chanman-retries-prep branch from 59510b9 to 45cca60CompareNovember 23, 2022 17:49
Comment threadlightning/src/routing/scoring.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/routing/scoring.rs Outdated
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Feel free to squash, IMO.

This helps us prepare to move all payment retries into ChannelManager, which is
needed for trampoline payments.
@valentinewallace
valentinewallaceforce-pushed the 2022-11-chanman-retries-prep branch from 70ca0d4 to 3f53951CompareNovember 29, 2022 17:52
TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt previously approved these changes Nov 29, 2022
We move it to router instead of scoring because it pairs with the InFlightHtlcs
struct in router and is useful for custom Router trait implementations
@valentinewallace
valentinewallaceforce-pushed the 2022-11-chanman-retries-prep branch from 3f53951 to 8a51a79CompareNovember 30, 2022 21:30
use lightning::ln::msgs::{ChannelMessageHandler, ErrorAction, LightningError};
use lightning::routing::gossip::{EffectiveCapacity, NodeId};
use lightning::routing::router::{InFlightHtlcs, PaymentParameters, Route, RouteHop, Router};
use lightning::routing::router::{InFlightHtlcs, PaymentParameters, Route, RouteHop, Router, ScorerAccountingForInFlightHtlcs};

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's a little strange that we test ScorerAccountingForInFlightHtlcs in this crate still in considers_inflight_htlcs_between_retries. Probably should move the test.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we save that since all of the tests are going to be moving soon?

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 5e577cb into lightningdevkit:mainDec 1, 2022
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@valentinewallace@codecov-commenter@TheBlueMatt@jkczyz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Prepare for Payment Retries in ChannelManager - #1862

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 4 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2022-11-chanman-retries-prep
Dec 1, 2022
Merged

Prepare for Payment Retries in ChannelManager#1862
TheBlueMatt merged 4 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2022-11-chanman-retries-prep

Conversation

@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Just code moves that help us prepare for getting rid of the InvoicePayer and moving payment retries into ChannelManager, in preparation for trampoline payments.

Comment threadlightning/src/routing/router.rs
@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

After we sort out whether to make ScorerAccountingForInFlightHtlcs public I can update its methods and docs.

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Nov 18, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Base: 90.72% // Head: 91.02% // Increases project coverage by +0.30% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (70ca0d4) compared to base (8245128).
Patch coverage: 37.50% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

❗ Current head 70ca0d4 differs from pull request most recent head 3f53951. Consider uploading reports for the commit 3f53951 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1862 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.72% 91.02% +0.30% 
==========================================
Files 91 91 Lines 47896 49984 +2088 Branches 47896 49984 +2088 ==========================================
+ Hits 43453 45499 +2046 - Misses 4443 4485 +42 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
lightning-background-processor/src/lib.rs96.40% <ø> (+0.96%)⬆️
lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs89.48% <ø> (+0.21%)⬆️
lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs97.81% <ø> (+2.60%)⬆️
lightning/src/routing/router.rs90.86% <13.79%> (-0.87%)⬇️
lightning/src/routing/scoring.rs96.92% <100.00%> (+0.03%)⬆️
lightning-net-tokio/src/lib.rs76.73% <0.00%> (-0.31%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/peer_channel_encryptor.rs93.38% <0.00%> (-0.25%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs99.44% <0.00%> (-0.12%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs97.07% <0.00%> (-0.04%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs86.31% <0.00%> (-0.03%)⬇️
... and 6 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@valentinewallace
valentinewallaceforce-pushed the 2022-11-chanman-retries-prep branch 2 times, most recently from 94fcf48 to ea0c8cbCompareNovember 21, 2022 23:35
@valentinewallace
valentinewallace marked this pull request as ready for review November 22, 2022 00:02
@valentinewallace
valentinewallaceforce-pushed the 2022-11-chanman-retries-prep branch 5 times, most recently from e38cd12 to 59510b9CompareNovember 22, 2022 16:12
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Hmm, is there some way to retain the find_route_with_id logic here? Even if we move retries to ChannelManager we still want to pass the PaymentId into the router, I think.

@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Hmm, is there some way to retain the find_route_with_id logic here? Even if we move retries to ChannelManager we still want to pass the PaymentId into the router, I think.

For sure, how about an additional Router method with a default implementation?

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

That seems reasonable to me.

@valentinewallace
valentinewallaceforce-pushed the 2022-11-chanman-retries-prep branch from 59510b9 to 45cca60CompareNovember 23, 2022 17:49
Comment threadlightning/src/routing/scoring.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/routing/scoring.rs Outdated
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Feel free to squash, IMO.

This helps us prepare to move all payment retries into ChannelManager, which is
needed for trampoline payments.
@valentinewallace
valentinewallaceforce-pushed the 2022-11-chanman-retries-prep branch from 70ca0d4 to 3f53951CompareNovember 29, 2022 17:52
TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt previously approved these changes Nov 29, 2022
We move it to router instead of scoring because it pairs with the InFlightHtlcs
struct in router and is useful for custom Router trait implementations
@valentinewallace
valentinewallaceforce-pushed the 2022-11-chanman-retries-prep branch from 3f53951 to 8a51a79CompareNovember 30, 2022 21:30
use lightning::ln::msgs::{ChannelMessageHandler, ErrorAction, LightningError};
use lightning::routing::gossip::{EffectiveCapacity, NodeId};
use lightning::routing::router::{InFlightHtlcs, PaymentParameters, Route, RouteHop, Router};
use lightning::routing::router::{InFlightHtlcs, PaymentParameters, Route, RouteHop, Router, ScorerAccountingForInFlightHtlcs};

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's a little strange that we test ScorerAccountingForInFlightHtlcs in this crate still in considers_inflight_htlcs_between_retries. Probably should move the test.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we save that since all of the tests are going to be moving soon?

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 5e577cb into lightningdevkit:mainDec 1, 2022
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@valentinewallace@codecov-commenter@TheBlueMatt@jkczyz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Prepare for Payment Retries in ChannelManager - #1862

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 4 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2022-11-chanman-retries-prep
Dec 1, 2022
Merged

Prepare for Payment Retries in ChannelManager#1862
TheBlueMatt merged 4 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2022-11-chanman-retries-prep

Conversation

@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Just code moves that help us prepare for getting rid of the InvoicePayer and moving payment retries into ChannelManager, in preparation for trampoline payments.

Comment threadlightning/src/routing/router.rs
@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

After we sort out whether to make ScorerAccountingForInFlightHtlcs public I can update its methods and docs.

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Nov 18, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Base: 90.72% // Head: 91.02% // Increases project coverage by +0.30% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (70ca0d4) compared to base (8245128).
Patch coverage: 37.50% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

❗ Current head 70ca0d4 differs from pull request most recent head 3f53951. Consider uploading reports for the commit 3f53951 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1862 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.72% 91.02% +0.30% 
==========================================
Files 91 91 Lines 47896 49984 +2088 Branches 47896 49984 +2088 ==========================================
+ Hits 43453 45499 +2046 - Misses 4443 4485 +42 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
lightning-background-processor/src/lib.rs96.40% <ø> (+0.96%)⬆️
lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs89.48% <ø> (+0.21%)⬆️
lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs97.81% <ø> (+2.60%)⬆️
lightning/src/routing/router.rs90.86% <13.79%> (-0.87%)⬇️
lightning/src/routing/scoring.rs96.92% <100.00%> (+0.03%)⬆️
lightning-net-tokio/src/lib.rs76.73% <0.00%> (-0.31%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/peer_channel_encryptor.rs93.38% <0.00%> (-0.25%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs99.44% <0.00%> (-0.12%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs97.07% <0.00%> (-0.04%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs86.31% <0.00%> (-0.03%)⬇️
... and 6 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@valentinewallace
valentinewallaceforce-pushed the 2022-11-chanman-retries-prep branch 2 times, most recently from 94fcf48 to ea0c8cbCompareNovember 21, 2022 23:35
@valentinewallace
valentinewallace marked this pull request as ready for review November 22, 2022 00:02
@valentinewallace
valentinewallaceforce-pushed the 2022-11-chanman-retries-prep branch 5 times, most recently from e38cd12 to 59510b9CompareNovember 22, 2022 16:12
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Hmm, is there some way to retain the find_route_with_id logic here? Even if we move retries to ChannelManager we still want to pass the PaymentId into the router, I think.

@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Hmm, is there some way to retain the find_route_with_id logic here? Even if we move retries to ChannelManager we still want to pass the PaymentId into the router, I think.

For sure, how about an additional Router method with a default implementation?

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

That seems reasonable to me.

@valentinewallace
valentinewallaceforce-pushed the 2022-11-chanman-retries-prep branch from 59510b9 to 45cca60CompareNovember 23, 2022 17:49
Comment threadlightning/src/routing/scoring.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/routing/scoring.rs Outdated
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Feel free to squash, IMO.

This helps us prepare to move all payment retries into ChannelManager, which is
needed for trampoline payments.
@valentinewallace
valentinewallaceforce-pushed the 2022-11-chanman-retries-prep branch from 70ca0d4 to 3f53951CompareNovember 29, 2022 17:52
TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt previously approved these changes Nov 29, 2022
We move it to router instead of scoring because it pairs with the InFlightHtlcs
struct in router and is useful for custom Router trait implementations
@valentinewallace
valentinewallaceforce-pushed the 2022-11-chanman-retries-prep branch from 3f53951 to 8a51a79CompareNovember 30, 2022 21:30
use lightning::ln::msgs::{ChannelMessageHandler, ErrorAction, LightningError};
use lightning::routing::gossip::{EffectiveCapacity, NodeId};
use lightning::routing::router::{InFlightHtlcs, PaymentParameters, Route, RouteHop, Router};
use lightning::routing::router::{InFlightHtlcs, PaymentParameters, Route, RouteHop, Router, ScorerAccountingForInFlightHtlcs};

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's a little strange that we test ScorerAccountingForInFlightHtlcs in this crate still in considers_inflight_htlcs_between_retries. Probably should move the test.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we save that since all of the tests are going to be moving soon?

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 5e577cb into lightningdevkit:mainDec 1, 2022
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@valentinewallace@codecov-commenter@TheBlueMatt@jkczyz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Prepare for Payment Retries in ChannelManager - #1862

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 4 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2022-11-chanman-retries-prep
Dec 1, 2022
Merged

Prepare for Payment Retries in ChannelManager#1862
TheBlueMatt merged 4 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2022-11-chanman-retries-prep

Conversation

@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Just code moves that help us prepare for getting rid of the InvoicePayer and moving payment retries into ChannelManager, in preparation for trampoline payments.

Comment threadlightning/src/routing/router.rs
@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

After we sort out whether to make ScorerAccountingForInFlightHtlcs public I can update its methods and docs.

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Nov 18, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Base: 90.72% // Head: 91.02% // Increases project coverage by +0.30% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (70ca0d4) compared to base (8245128).
Patch coverage: 37.50% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

❗ Current head 70ca0d4 differs from pull request most recent head 3f53951. Consider uploading reports for the commit 3f53951 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1862 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.72% 91.02% +0.30% 
==========================================
Files 91 91 Lines 47896 49984 +2088 Branches 47896 49984 +2088 ==========================================
+ Hits 43453 45499 +2046 - Misses 4443 4485 +42 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
lightning-background-processor/src/lib.rs96.40% <ø> (+0.96%)⬆️
lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs89.48% <ø> (+0.21%)⬆️
lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs97.81% <ø> (+2.60%)⬆️
lightning/src/routing/router.rs90.86% <13.79%> (-0.87%)⬇️
lightning/src/routing/scoring.rs96.92% <100.00%> (+0.03%)⬆️
lightning-net-tokio/src/lib.rs76.73% <0.00%> (-0.31%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/peer_channel_encryptor.rs93.38% <0.00%> (-0.25%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs99.44% <0.00%> (-0.12%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs97.07% <0.00%> (-0.04%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs86.31% <0.00%> (-0.03%)⬇️
... and 6 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@valentinewallace
valentinewallaceforce-pushed the 2022-11-chanman-retries-prep branch 2 times, most recently from 94fcf48 to ea0c8cbCompareNovember 21, 2022 23:35
@valentinewallace
valentinewallace marked this pull request as ready for review November 22, 2022 00:02
@valentinewallace
valentinewallaceforce-pushed the 2022-11-chanman-retries-prep branch 5 times, most recently from e38cd12 to 59510b9CompareNovember 22, 2022 16:12
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Hmm, is there some way to retain the find_route_with_id logic here? Even if we move retries to ChannelManager we still want to pass the PaymentId into the router, I think.

@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Hmm, is there some way to retain the find_route_with_id logic here? Even if we move retries to ChannelManager we still want to pass the PaymentId into the router, I think.

For sure, how about an additional Router method with a default implementation?

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

That seems reasonable to me.

@valentinewallace
valentinewallaceforce-pushed the 2022-11-chanman-retries-prep branch from 59510b9 to 45cca60CompareNovember 23, 2022 17:49
Comment threadlightning/src/routing/scoring.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/routing/scoring.rs Outdated
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Feel free to squash, IMO.

This helps us prepare to move all payment retries into ChannelManager, which is
needed for trampoline payments.
@valentinewallace
valentinewallaceforce-pushed the 2022-11-chanman-retries-prep branch from 70ca0d4 to 3f53951CompareNovember 29, 2022 17:52
TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt previously approved these changes Nov 29, 2022
We move it to router instead of scoring because it pairs with the InFlightHtlcs
struct in router and is useful for custom Router trait implementations
@valentinewallace
valentinewallaceforce-pushed the 2022-11-chanman-retries-prep branch from 3f53951 to 8a51a79CompareNovember 30, 2022 21:30
use lightning::ln::msgs::{ChannelMessageHandler, ErrorAction, LightningError};
use lightning::routing::gossip::{EffectiveCapacity, NodeId};
use lightning::routing::router::{InFlightHtlcs, PaymentParameters, Route, RouteHop, Router};
use lightning::routing::router::{InFlightHtlcs, PaymentParameters, Route, RouteHop, Router, ScorerAccountingForInFlightHtlcs};

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's a little strange that we test ScorerAccountingForInFlightHtlcs in this crate still in considers_inflight_htlcs_between_retries. Probably should move the test.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we save that since all of the tests are going to be moving soon?

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 5e577cb into lightningdevkit:mainDec 1, 2022
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@valentinewallace@codecov-commenter@TheBlueMatt@jkczyz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Prepare for Payment Retries in ChannelManager - #1862

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 4 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2022-11-chanman-retries-prep
Dec 1, 2022
Merged

Prepare for Payment Retries in ChannelManager#1862
TheBlueMatt merged 4 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2022-11-chanman-retries-prep

Conversation

@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Just code moves that help us prepare for getting rid of the InvoicePayer and moving payment retries into ChannelManager, in preparation for trampoline payments.

Comment threadlightning/src/routing/router.rs
@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

After we sort out whether to make ScorerAccountingForInFlightHtlcs public I can update its methods and docs.

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Nov 18, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Base: 90.72% // Head: 91.02% // Increases project coverage by +0.30% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (70ca0d4) compared to base (8245128).
Patch coverage: 37.50% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

❗ Current head 70ca0d4 differs from pull request most recent head 3f53951. Consider uploading reports for the commit 3f53951 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1862 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.72% 91.02% +0.30% 
==========================================
Files 91 91 Lines 47896 49984 +2088 Branches 47896 49984 +2088 ==========================================
+ Hits 43453 45499 +2046 - Misses 4443 4485 +42 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
lightning-background-processor/src/lib.rs96.40% <ø> (+0.96%)⬆️
lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs89.48% <ø> (+0.21%)⬆️
lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs97.81% <ø> (+2.60%)⬆️
lightning/src/routing/router.rs90.86% <13.79%> (-0.87%)⬇️
lightning/src/routing/scoring.rs96.92% <100.00%> (+0.03%)⬆️
lightning-net-tokio/src/lib.rs76.73% <0.00%> (-0.31%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/peer_channel_encryptor.rs93.38% <0.00%> (-0.25%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs99.44% <0.00%> (-0.12%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs97.07% <0.00%> (-0.04%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs86.31% <0.00%> (-0.03%)⬇️
... and 6 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@valentinewallace
valentinewallaceforce-pushed the 2022-11-chanman-retries-prep branch 2 times, most recently from 94fcf48 to ea0c8cbCompareNovember 21, 2022 23:35
@valentinewallace
valentinewallace marked this pull request as ready for review November 22, 2022 00:02
@valentinewallace
valentinewallaceforce-pushed the 2022-11-chanman-retries-prep branch 5 times, most recently from e38cd12 to 59510b9CompareNovember 22, 2022 16:12
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Hmm, is there some way to retain the find_route_with_id logic here? Even if we move retries to ChannelManager we still want to pass the PaymentId into the router, I think.

@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Hmm, is there some way to retain the find_route_with_id logic here? Even if we move retries to ChannelManager we still want to pass the PaymentId into the router, I think.

For sure, how about an additional Router method with a default implementation?

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

That seems reasonable to me.

@valentinewallace
valentinewallaceforce-pushed the 2022-11-chanman-retries-prep branch from 59510b9 to 45cca60CompareNovember 23, 2022 17:49
Comment threadlightning/src/routing/scoring.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/routing/scoring.rs Outdated
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Feel free to squash, IMO.

This helps us prepare to move all payment retries into ChannelManager, which is
needed for trampoline payments.
@valentinewallace
valentinewallaceforce-pushed the 2022-11-chanman-retries-prep branch from 70ca0d4 to 3f53951CompareNovember 29, 2022 17:52
TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt previously approved these changes Nov 29, 2022
We move it to router instead of scoring because it pairs with the InFlightHtlcs
struct in router and is useful for custom Router trait implementations
@valentinewallace
valentinewallaceforce-pushed the 2022-11-chanman-retries-prep branch from 3f53951 to 8a51a79CompareNovember 30, 2022 21:30
use lightning::ln::msgs::{ChannelMessageHandler, ErrorAction, LightningError};
use lightning::routing::gossip::{EffectiveCapacity, NodeId};
use lightning::routing::router::{InFlightHtlcs, PaymentParameters, Route, RouteHop, Router};
use lightning::routing::router::{InFlightHtlcs, PaymentParameters, Route, RouteHop, Router, ScorerAccountingForInFlightHtlcs};

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's a little strange that we test ScorerAccountingForInFlightHtlcs in this crate still in considers_inflight_htlcs_between_retries. Probably should move the test.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we save that since all of the tests are going to be moving soon?

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 5e577cb into lightningdevkit:mainDec 1, 2022
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@valentinewallace@codecov-commenter@TheBlueMatt@jkczyz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Prepare for Payment Retries in ChannelManager - #1862

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 4 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2022-11-chanman-retries-prep
Dec 1, 2022
Merged

Prepare for Payment Retries in ChannelManager#1862
TheBlueMatt merged 4 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2022-11-chanman-retries-prep

Conversation

@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Just code moves that help us prepare for getting rid of the InvoicePayer and moving payment retries into ChannelManager, in preparation for trampoline payments.

Comment threadlightning/src/routing/router.rs
@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

After we sort out whether to make ScorerAccountingForInFlightHtlcs public I can update its methods and docs.

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Nov 18, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Base: 90.72% // Head: 91.02% // Increases project coverage by +0.30% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (70ca0d4) compared to base (8245128).
Patch coverage: 37.50% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

❗ Current head 70ca0d4 differs from pull request most recent head 3f53951. Consider uploading reports for the commit 3f53951 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1862 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.72% 91.02% +0.30% 
==========================================
Files 91 91 Lines 47896 49984 +2088 Branches 47896 49984 +2088 ==========================================
+ Hits 43453 45499 +2046 - Misses 4443 4485 +42 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
lightning-background-processor/src/lib.rs96.40% <ø> (+0.96%)⬆️
lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs89.48% <ø> (+0.21%)⬆️
lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs97.81% <ø> (+2.60%)⬆️
lightning/src/routing/router.rs90.86% <13.79%> (-0.87%)⬇️
lightning/src/routing/scoring.rs96.92% <100.00%> (+0.03%)⬆️
lightning-net-tokio/src/lib.rs76.73% <0.00%> (-0.31%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/peer_channel_encryptor.rs93.38% <0.00%> (-0.25%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs99.44% <0.00%> (-0.12%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs97.07% <0.00%> (-0.04%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs86.31% <0.00%> (-0.03%)⬇️
... and 6 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@valentinewallace
valentinewallaceforce-pushed the 2022-11-chanman-retries-prep branch 2 times, most recently from 94fcf48 to ea0c8cbCompareNovember 21, 2022 23:35
@valentinewallace
valentinewallace marked this pull request as ready for review November 22, 2022 00:02
@valentinewallace
valentinewallaceforce-pushed the 2022-11-chanman-retries-prep branch 5 times, most recently from e38cd12 to 59510b9CompareNovember 22, 2022 16:12
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Hmm, is there some way to retain the find_route_with_id logic here? Even if we move retries to ChannelManager we still want to pass the PaymentId into the router, I think.

@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Hmm, is there some way to retain the find_route_with_id logic here? Even if we move retries to ChannelManager we still want to pass the PaymentId into the router, I think.

For sure, how about an additional Router method with a default implementation?

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

That seems reasonable to me.

@valentinewallace
valentinewallaceforce-pushed the 2022-11-chanman-retries-prep branch from 59510b9 to 45cca60CompareNovember 23, 2022 17:49
Comment threadlightning/src/routing/scoring.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/routing/scoring.rs Outdated
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Feel free to squash, IMO.

This helps us prepare to move all payment retries into ChannelManager, which is
needed for trampoline payments.
@valentinewallace
valentinewallaceforce-pushed the 2022-11-chanman-retries-prep branch from 70ca0d4 to 3f53951CompareNovember 29, 2022 17:52
TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt previously approved these changes Nov 29, 2022
We move it to router instead of scoring because it pairs with the InFlightHtlcs
struct in router and is useful for custom Router trait implementations
@valentinewallace
valentinewallaceforce-pushed the 2022-11-chanman-retries-prep branch from 3f53951 to 8a51a79CompareNovember 30, 2022 21:30
use lightning::ln::msgs::{ChannelMessageHandler, ErrorAction, LightningError};
use lightning::routing::gossip::{EffectiveCapacity, NodeId};
use lightning::routing::router::{InFlightHtlcs, PaymentParameters, Route, RouteHop, Router};
use lightning::routing::router::{InFlightHtlcs, PaymentParameters, Route, RouteHop, Router, ScorerAccountingForInFlightHtlcs};

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's a little strange that we test ScorerAccountingForInFlightHtlcs in this crate still in considers_inflight_htlcs_between_retries. Probably should move the test.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we save that since all of the tests are going to be moving soon?

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 5e577cb into lightningdevkit:mainDec 1, 2022
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@valentinewallace@codecov-commenter@TheBlueMatt@jkczyz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Prepare for Payment Retries in ChannelManager - #1862

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 4 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2022-11-chanman-retries-prep
Dec 1, 2022
Merged

Prepare for Payment Retries in ChannelManager#1862
TheBlueMatt merged 4 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2022-11-chanman-retries-prep

Conversation

@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Just code moves that help us prepare for getting rid of the InvoicePayer and moving payment retries into ChannelManager, in preparation for trampoline payments.

Comment threadlightning/src/routing/router.rs
@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

After we sort out whether to make ScorerAccountingForInFlightHtlcs public I can update its methods and docs.

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Nov 18, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Base: 90.72% // Head: 91.02% // Increases project coverage by +0.30% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (70ca0d4) compared to base (8245128).
Patch coverage: 37.50% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

❗ Current head 70ca0d4 differs from pull request most recent head 3f53951. Consider uploading reports for the commit 3f53951 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1862 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.72% 91.02% +0.30% 
==========================================
Files 91 91 Lines 47896 49984 +2088 Branches 47896 49984 +2088 ==========================================
+ Hits 43453 45499 +2046 - Misses 4443 4485 +42 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
lightning-background-processor/src/lib.rs96.40% <ø> (+0.96%)⬆️
lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs89.48% <ø> (+0.21%)⬆️
lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs97.81% <ø> (+2.60%)⬆️
lightning/src/routing/router.rs90.86% <13.79%> (-0.87%)⬇️
lightning/src/routing/scoring.rs96.92% <100.00%> (+0.03%)⬆️
lightning-net-tokio/src/lib.rs76.73% <0.00%> (-0.31%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/peer_channel_encryptor.rs93.38% <0.00%> (-0.25%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs99.44% <0.00%> (-0.12%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs97.07% <0.00%> (-0.04%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs86.31% <0.00%> (-0.03%)⬇️
... and 6 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@valentinewallace
valentinewallaceforce-pushed the 2022-11-chanman-retries-prep branch 2 times, most recently from 94fcf48 to ea0c8cbCompareNovember 21, 2022 23:35
@valentinewallace
valentinewallace marked this pull request as ready for review November 22, 2022 00:02
@valentinewallace
valentinewallaceforce-pushed the 2022-11-chanman-retries-prep branch 5 times, most recently from e38cd12 to 59510b9CompareNovember 22, 2022 16:12
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Hmm, is there some way to retain the find_route_with_id logic here? Even if we move retries to ChannelManager we still want to pass the PaymentId into the router, I think.

@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Hmm, is there some way to retain the find_route_with_id logic here? Even if we move retries to ChannelManager we still want to pass the PaymentId into the router, I think.

For sure, how about an additional Router method with a default implementation?

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

That seems reasonable to me.

@valentinewallace
valentinewallaceforce-pushed the 2022-11-chanman-retries-prep branch from 59510b9 to 45cca60CompareNovember 23, 2022 17:49
Comment threadlightning/src/routing/scoring.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/routing/scoring.rs Outdated
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Feel free to squash, IMO.

This helps us prepare to move all payment retries into ChannelManager, which is
needed for trampoline payments.
@valentinewallace
valentinewallaceforce-pushed the 2022-11-chanman-retries-prep branch from 70ca0d4 to 3f53951CompareNovember 29, 2022 17:52
TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt previously approved these changes Nov 29, 2022
We move it to router instead of scoring because it pairs with the InFlightHtlcs
struct in router and is useful for custom Router trait implementations
@valentinewallace
valentinewallaceforce-pushed the 2022-11-chanman-retries-prep branch from 3f53951 to 8a51a79CompareNovember 30, 2022 21:30
use lightning::ln::msgs::{ChannelMessageHandler, ErrorAction, LightningError};
use lightning::routing::gossip::{EffectiveCapacity, NodeId};
use lightning::routing::router::{InFlightHtlcs, PaymentParameters, Route, RouteHop, Router};
use lightning::routing::router::{InFlightHtlcs, PaymentParameters, Route, RouteHop, Router, ScorerAccountingForInFlightHtlcs};

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's a little strange that we test ScorerAccountingForInFlightHtlcs in this crate still in considers_inflight_htlcs_between_retries. Probably should move the test.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we save that since all of the tests are going to be moving soon?

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 5e577cb into lightningdevkit:mainDec 1, 2022
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@valentinewallace@codecov-commenter@TheBlueMatt@jkczyz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Prepare for Payment Retries in ChannelManager - #1862

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 4 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2022-11-chanman-retries-prep
Dec 1, 2022
Merged

Prepare for Payment Retries in ChannelManager#1862
TheBlueMatt merged 4 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2022-11-chanman-retries-prep

Conversation

@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Just code moves that help us prepare for getting rid of the InvoicePayer and moving payment retries into ChannelManager, in preparation for trampoline payments.

Comment threadlightning/src/routing/router.rs
@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

After we sort out whether to make ScorerAccountingForInFlightHtlcs public I can update its methods and docs.

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Nov 18, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Base: 90.72% // Head: 91.02% // Increases project coverage by +0.30% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (70ca0d4) compared to base (8245128).
Patch coverage: 37.50% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

❗ Current head 70ca0d4 differs from pull request most recent head 3f53951. Consider uploading reports for the commit 3f53951 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1862 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.72% 91.02% +0.30% 
==========================================
Files 91 91 Lines 47896 49984 +2088 Branches 47896 49984 +2088 ==========================================
+ Hits 43453 45499 +2046 - Misses 4443 4485 +42 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
lightning-background-processor/src/lib.rs96.40% <ø> (+0.96%)⬆️
lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs89.48% <ø> (+0.21%)⬆️
lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs97.81% <ø> (+2.60%)⬆️
lightning/src/routing/router.rs90.86% <13.79%> (-0.87%)⬇️
lightning/src/routing/scoring.rs96.92% <100.00%> (+0.03%)⬆️
lightning-net-tokio/src/lib.rs76.73% <0.00%> (-0.31%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/peer_channel_encryptor.rs93.38% <0.00%> (-0.25%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs99.44% <0.00%> (-0.12%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs97.07% <0.00%> (-0.04%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs86.31% <0.00%> (-0.03%)⬇️
... and 6 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@valentinewallace
valentinewallaceforce-pushed the 2022-11-chanman-retries-prep branch 2 times, most recently from 94fcf48 to ea0c8cbCompareNovember 21, 2022 23:35
@valentinewallace
valentinewallace marked this pull request as ready for review November 22, 2022 00:02
@valentinewallace
valentinewallaceforce-pushed the 2022-11-chanman-retries-prep branch 5 times, most recently from e38cd12 to 59510b9CompareNovember 22, 2022 16:12
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Hmm, is there some way to retain the find_route_with_id logic here? Even if we move retries to ChannelManager we still want to pass the PaymentId into the router, I think.

@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Hmm, is there some way to retain the find_route_with_id logic here? Even if we move retries to ChannelManager we still want to pass the PaymentId into the router, I think.

For sure, how about an additional Router method with a default implementation?

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

That seems reasonable to me.

@valentinewallace
valentinewallaceforce-pushed the 2022-11-chanman-retries-prep branch from 59510b9 to 45cca60CompareNovember 23, 2022 17:49
Comment threadlightning/src/routing/scoring.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/routing/scoring.rs Outdated
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Feel free to squash, IMO.

This helps us prepare to move all payment retries into ChannelManager, which is
needed for trampoline payments.
@valentinewallace
valentinewallaceforce-pushed the 2022-11-chanman-retries-prep branch from 70ca0d4 to 3f53951CompareNovember 29, 2022 17:52
TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt previously approved these changes Nov 29, 2022
We move it to router instead of scoring because it pairs with the InFlightHtlcs
struct in router and is useful for custom Router trait implementations
@valentinewallace
valentinewallaceforce-pushed the 2022-11-chanman-retries-prep branch from 3f53951 to 8a51a79CompareNovember 30, 2022 21:30
use lightning::ln::msgs::{ChannelMessageHandler, ErrorAction, LightningError};
use lightning::routing::gossip::{EffectiveCapacity, NodeId};
use lightning::routing::router::{InFlightHtlcs, PaymentParameters, Route, RouteHop, Router};
use lightning::routing::router::{InFlightHtlcs, PaymentParameters, Route, RouteHop, Router, ScorerAccountingForInFlightHtlcs};

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's a little strange that we test ScorerAccountingForInFlightHtlcs in this crate still in considers_inflight_htlcs_between_retries. Probably should move the test.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we save that since all of the tests are going to be moving soon?

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 5e577cb into lightningdevkit:mainDec 1, 2022
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@valentinewallace@codecov-commenter@TheBlueMatt@jkczyz