Use UserConfig to determine advertised InitFeatures by ChannelManager - #1946

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:init-features-user-config
Jan 15, 2023
Merged

Use UserConfig to determine advertised InitFeatures by ChannelManager#1946
TheBlueMatt merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:init-features-user-config

Conversation

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This is purely a refactor that does not change the InitFeatures advertised by a ChannelManager. This allows users to configure which features should be advertised based on the values of UserConfig. While there aren't any existing features currently leveraging this behavior, it will be used by the upcoming anchors_zero_fee_htlc_tx feature.

The UserConfig dependency on provided_init_features caused most callsites of the main test methods responsible for opening channels to be updated. This commit foregos that completely by no longer requiring the InitFeatures of each side to be provided to these methods. The methods already require a reference to each node's ChannelManager to open the channel, so we use that same reference to obtain their InitFeatures. A way to override such features was required for some tests, so a new override_init_features config option now exists on the test harness.

Motivated by the discussion in #1860 (comment).

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, thanks. Honestly probably should have done this when the code was added, but oh well. One comment but otherwise LGTM, note CI is failing.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the init-features-user-config branch 3 times, most recently from 07be198 to a6c69b0CompareJanuary 13, 2023 20:04
let open_channel_msg = get_event_msg!(node_a, MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, node_b.node.get_our_node_id());
assert_eq!(open_channel_msg.temporary_channel_id, create_chan_id);
assert_eq!(node_a.node.list_channels().iter().find(|channel| channel.channel_id == create_chan_id).unwrap().user_channel_id, 42);
let a_flags = node_a.override_init_features.borrow().clone().unwrap_or_else(|| node_a.node.init_features());

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

wouldn't unwrap_or do the trick?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

With unwrap_or, its argument will always be evaluated, whereas with unwrap_or_else, it's only evaluated if None. Doesn't really matter since it's just a test.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point. I'd lean towards legibility > (imo premature) optimization in this case, but am fine either way.

Comment threadlightning/src/routing/gossip.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/routing/scoring.rs Outdated
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the init-features-user-config branch from a6c69b0 to 69fd9d0CompareJanuary 13, 2023 23:12
@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Jan 13, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Base: 90.73% // Head: 90.70% // Decreases project coverage by -0.03%⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (69fd9d0) compared to base (ac6e0b3).
Patch coverage: 98.64% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

❗ Current head 69fd9d0 differs from pull request most recent head abf4e79. Consider uploading reports for the commit abf4e79 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1946 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 90.73% 90.70% -0.04% 
==========================================
Files 97 97 Lines 50548 50568 +20 Branches 50548 50568 +20 ==========================================
+ Hits 45864 45866 +2 - Misses 4684 4702 +18 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs96.91% <ø> (-0.15%)⬇️
lightning/src/util/test_utils.rs71.30% <50.00%> (-0.22%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs87.11% <94.54%> (-0.06%)⬇️
lightning/src/routing/router.rs90.91% <94.87%> (+<0.01%)⬆️
lightning/src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs91.49% <96.42%> (+0.02%)⬆️
lightning-background-processor/src/lib.rs95.45% <100.00%> (ø)
lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs89.48% <100.00%> (ø)
lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs97.76% <100.00%> (ø)
lightning-persister/src/lib.rs93.49% <100.00%> (ø)
lightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs97.82% <100.00%> (-0.01%)⬇️
... and 32 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Needs rebase, sorry.

This is purely a refactor that does not change the InitFeatures
advertised by a ChannelManager. This allows users to configure which
features should be advertised based on the values of `UserConfig`. While
there aren't any existing features currently leveraging this behavior,
it will be used by the upcoming anchors_zero_fee_htlc_tx feature.
The UserConfig dependency on provided_init_features caused most
callsites of the main test methods responsible for opening channels to
be updated. This commit foregos that completely by no longer requiring
the InitFeatures of each side to be provided to these methods. The
methods already require a reference to each node's ChannelManager to
open the channel, so we use that same reference to obtain their
InitFeatures. A way to override such features was required for some
tests, so a new `override_init_features` config option now exists on
the test harness.
@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Sorry about the labels. Looks good to me, but I'll rereview after rebase.

@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the init-features-user-config branch from 69fd9d0 to abf4e79CompareJanuary 14, 2023 22:01

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should also do #1954.


let msg = msgs::UnsignedChannelAnnouncement {
features: channelmanager::provided_channel_features(),
features: channelmanager::provided_channel_features(&user_config),

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is fine for now, but we'll need to tweak this further once we get to things like PTLC as we'll need the provided-channel-flags to include some info about the channel_type as well.

let mut accept_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
accept_channel.to_self_delay = 200;
nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), channelmanager::provided_init_features(), &accept_channel);
nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), nodes[0].node.init_features(), &accept_channel);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Heh, finally caught one with the wrong node passed :)

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit de783e0 into lightningdevkit:mainJan 15, 2023
@wpaulino
wpaulino deleted the init-features-user-config branch January 16, 2023 20:24
@wpaulinowpaulino mentioned this pull request Mar 3, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@wpaulino@codecov-commenter@TheBlueMatt@arik-so
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Use UserConfig to determine advertised InitFeatures by ChannelManager - #1946

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:init-features-user-config
Jan 15, 2023
Merged

Use UserConfig to determine advertised InitFeatures by ChannelManager#1946
TheBlueMatt merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:init-features-user-config

Conversation

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This is purely a refactor that does not change the InitFeatures advertised by a ChannelManager. This allows users to configure which features should be advertised based on the values of UserConfig. While there aren't any existing features currently leveraging this behavior, it will be used by the upcoming anchors_zero_fee_htlc_tx feature.

The UserConfig dependency on provided_init_features caused most callsites of the main test methods responsible for opening channels to be updated. This commit foregos that completely by no longer requiring the InitFeatures of each side to be provided to these methods. The methods already require a reference to each node's ChannelManager to open the channel, so we use that same reference to obtain their InitFeatures. A way to override such features was required for some tests, so a new override_init_features config option now exists on the test harness.

Motivated by the discussion in #1860 (comment).

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, thanks. Honestly probably should have done this when the code was added, but oh well. One comment but otherwise LGTM, note CI is failing.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the init-features-user-config branch 3 times, most recently from 07be198 to a6c69b0CompareJanuary 13, 2023 20:04
let open_channel_msg = get_event_msg!(node_a, MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, node_b.node.get_our_node_id());
assert_eq!(open_channel_msg.temporary_channel_id, create_chan_id);
assert_eq!(node_a.node.list_channels().iter().find(|channel| channel.channel_id == create_chan_id).unwrap().user_channel_id, 42);
let a_flags = node_a.override_init_features.borrow().clone().unwrap_or_else(|| node_a.node.init_features());

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

wouldn't unwrap_or do the trick?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

With unwrap_or, its argument will always be evaluated, whereas with unwrap_or_else, it's only evaluated if None. Doesn't really matter since it's just a test.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point. I'd lean towards legibility > (imo premature) optimization in this case, but am fine either way.

Comment threadlightning/src/routing/gossip.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/routing/scoring.rs Outdated
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the init-features-user-config branch from a6c69b0 to 69fd9d0CompareJanuary 13, 2023 23:12
@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Jan 13, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Base: 90.73% // Head: 90.70% // Decreases project coverage by -0.03%⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (69fd9d0) compared to base (ac6e0b3).
Patch coverage: 98.64% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

❗ Current head 69fd9d0 differs from pull request most recent head abf4e79. Consider uploading reports for the commit abf4e79 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1946 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 90.73% 90.70% -0.04% 
==========================================
Files 97 97 Lines 50548 50568 +20 Branches 50548 50568 +20 ==========================================
+ Hits 45864 45866 +2 - Misses 4684 4702 +18 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs96.91% <ø> (-0.15%)⬇️
lightning/src/util/test_utils.rs71.30% <50.00%> (-0.22%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs87.11% <94.54%> (-0.06%)⬇️
lightning/src/routing/router.rs90.91% <94.87%> (+<0.01%)⬆️
lightning/src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs91.49% <96.42%> (+0.02%)⬆️
lightning-background-processor/src/lib.rs95.45% <100.00%> (ø)
lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs89.48% <100.00%> (ø)
lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs97.76% <100.00%> (ø)
lightning-persister/src/lib.rs93.49% <100.00%> (ø)
lightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs97.82% <100.00%> (-0.01%)⬇️
... and 32 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Needs rebase, sorry.

This is purely a refactor that does not change the InitFeatures
advertised by a ChannelManager. This allows users to configure which
features should be advertised based on the values of `UserConfig`. While
there aren't any existing features currently leveraging this behavior,
it will be used by the upcoming anchors_zero_fee_htlc_tx feature.
The UserConfig dependency on provided_init_features caused most
callsites of the main test methods responsible for opening channels to
be updated. This commit foregos that completely by no longer requiring
the InitFeatures of each side to be provided to these methods. The
methods already require a reference to each node's ChannelManager to
open the channel, so we use that same reference to obtain their
InitFeatures. A way to override such features was required for some
tests, so a new `override_init_features` config option now exists on
the test harness.
@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Sorry about the labels. Looks good to me, but I'll rereview after rebase.

@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the init-features-user-config branch from 69fd9d0 to abf4e79CompareJanuary 14, 2023 22:01

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should also do #1954.


let msg = msgs::UnsignedChannelAnnouncement {
features: channelmanager::provided_channel_features(),
features: channelmanager::provided_channel_features(&user_config),

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is fine for now, but we'll need to tweak this further once we get to things like PTLC as we'll need the provided-channel-flags to include some info about the channel_type as well.

let mut accept_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
accept_channel.to_self_delay = 200;
nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), channelmanager::provided_init_features(), &accept_channel);
nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), nodes[0].node.init_features(), &accept_channel);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Heh, finally caught one with the wrong node passed :)

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit de783e0 into lightningdevkit:mainJan 15, 2023
@wpaulino
wpaulino deleted the init-features-user-config branch January 16, 2023 20:24
@wpaulinowpaulino mentioned this pull request Mar 3, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@wpaulino@codecov-commenter@TheBlueMatt@arik-so
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Use UserConfig to determine advertised InitFeatures by ChannelManager - #1946

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:init-features-user-config
Jan 15, 2023
Merged

Use UserConfig to determine advertised InitFeatures by ChannelManager#1946
TheBlueMatt merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:init-features-user-config

Conversation

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This is purely a refactor that does not change the InitFeatures advertised by a ChannelManager. This allows users to configure which features should be advertised based on the values of UserConfig. While there aren't any existing features currently leveraging this behavior, it will be used by the upcoming anchors_zero_fee_htlc_tx feature.

The UserConfig dependency on provided_init_features caused most callsites of the main test methods responsible for opening channels to be updated. This commit foregos that completely by no longer requiring the InitFeatures of each side to be provided to these methods. The methods already require a reference to each node's ChannelManager to open the channel, so we use that same reference to obtain their InitFeatures. A way to override such features was required for some tests, so a new override_init_features config option now exists on the test harness.

Motivated by the discussion in #1860 (comment).

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, thanks. Honestly probably should have done this when the code was added, but oh well. One comment but otherwise LGTM, note CI is failing.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the init-features-user-config branch 3 times, most recently from 07be198 to a6c69b0CompareJanuary 13, 2023 20:04
let open_channel_msg = get_event_msg!(node_a, MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, node_b.node.get_our_node_id());
assert_eq!(open_channel_msg.temporary_channel_id, create_chan_id);
assert_eq!(node_a.node.list_channels().iter().find(|channel| channel.channel_id == create_chan_id).unwrap().user_channel_id, 42);
let a_flags = node_a.override_init_features.borrow().clone().unwrap_or_else(|| node_a.node.init_features());

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

wouldn't unwrap_or do the trick?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

With unwrap_or, its argument will always be evaluated, whereas with unwrap_or_else, it's only evaluated if None. Doesn't really matter since it's just a test.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point. I'd lean towards legibility > (imo premature) optimization in this case, but am fine either way.

Comment threadlightning/src/routing/gossip.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/routing/scoring.rs Outdated
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the init-features-user-config branch from a6c69b0 to 69fd9d0CompareJanuary 13, 2023 23:12
@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Jan 13, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Base: 90.73% // Head: 90.70% // Decreases project coverage by -0.03%⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (69fd9d0) compared to base (ac6e0b3).
Patch coverage: 98.64% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

❗ Current head 69fd9d0 differs from pull request most recent head abf4e79. Consider uploading reports for the commit abf4e79 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1946 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 90.73% 90.70% -0.04% 
==========================================
Files 97 97 Lines 50548 50568 +20 Branches 50548 50568 +20 ==========================================
+ Hits 45864 45866 +2 - Misses 4684 4702 +18 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs96.91% <ø> (-0.15%)⬇️
lightning/src/util/test_utils.rs71.30% <50.00%> (-0.22%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs87.11% <94.54%> (-0.06%)⬇️
lightning/src/routing/router.rs90.91% <94.87%> (+<0.01%)⬆️
lightning/src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs91.49% <96.42%> (+0.02%)⬆️
lightning-background-processor/src/lib.rs95.45% <100.00%> (ø)
lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs89.48% <100.00%> (ø)
lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs97.76% <100.00%> (ø)
lightning-persister/src/lib.rs93.49% <100.00%> (ø)
lightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs97.82% <100.00%> (-0.01%)⬇️
... and 32 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Needs rebase, sorry.

This is purely a refactor that does not change the InitFeatures
advertised by a ChannelManager. This allows users to configure which
features should be advertised based on the values of `UserConfig`. While
there aren't any existing features currently leveraging this behavior,
it will be used by the upcoming anchors_zero_fee_htlc_tx feature.
The UserConfig dependency on provided_init_features caused most
callsites of the main test methods responsible for opening channels to
be updated. This commit foregos that completely by no longer requiring
the InitFeatures of each side to be provided to these methods. The
methods already require a reference to each node's ChannelManager to
open the channel, so we use that same reference to obtain their
InitFeatures. A way to override such features was required for some
tests, so a new `override_init_features` config option now exists on
the test harness.
@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Sorry about the labels. Looks good to me, but I'll rereview after rebase.

@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the init-features-user-config branch from 69fd9d0 to abf4e79CompareJanuary 14, 2023 22:01

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should also do #1954.


let msg = msgs::UnsignedChannelAnnouncement {
features: channelmanager::provided_channel_features(),
features: channelmanager::provided_channel_features(&user_config),

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is fine for now, but we'll need to tweak this further once we get to things like PTLC as we'll need the provided-channel-flags to include some info about the channel_type as well.

let mut accept_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
accept_channel.to_self_delay = 200;
nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), channelmanager::provided_init_features(), &accept_channel);
nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), nodes[0].node.init_features(), &accept_channel);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Heh, finally caught one with the wrong node passed :)

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit de783e0 into lightningdevkit:mainJan 15, 2023
@wpaulino
wpaulino deleted the init-features-user-config branch January 16, 2023 20:24
@wpaulinowpaulino mentioned this pull request Mar 3, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@wpaulino@codecov-commenter@TheBlueMatt@arik-so
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Use UserConfig to determine advertised InitFeatures by ChannelManager - #1946

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:init-features-user-config
Jan 15, 2023
Merged

Use UserConfig to determine advertised InitFeatures by ChannelManager#1946
TheBlueMatt merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:init-features-user-config

Conversation

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This is purely a refactor that does not change the InitFeatures advertised by a ChannelManager. This allows users to configure which features should be advertised based on the values of UserConfig. While there aren't any existing features currently leveraging this behavior, it will be used by the upcoming anchors_zero_fee_htlc_tx feature.

The UserConfig dependency on provided_init_features caused most callsites of the main test methods responsible for opening channels to be updated. This commit foregos that completely by no longer requiring the InitFeatures of each side to be provided to these methods. The methods already require a reference to each node's ChannelManager to open the channel, so we use that same reference to obtain their InitFeatures. A way to override such features was required for some tests, so a new override_init_features config option now exists on the test harness.

Motivated by the discussion in #1860 (comment).

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, thanks. Honestly probably should have done this when the code was added, but oh well. One comment but otherwise LGTM, note CI is failing.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the init-features-user-config branch 3 times, most recently from 07be198 to a6c69b0CompareJanuary 13, 2023 20:04
let open_channel_msg = get_event_msg!(node_a, MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, node_b.node.get_our_node_id());
assert_eq!(open_channel_msg.temporary_channel_id, create_chan_id);
assert_eq!(node_a.node.list_channels().iter().find(|channel| channel.channel_id == create_chan_id).unwrap().user_channel_id, 42);
let a_flags = node_a.override_init_features.borrow().clone().unwrap_or_else(|| node_a.node.init_features());

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

wouldn't unwrap_or do the trick?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

With unwrap_or, its argument will always be evaluated, whereas with unwrap_or_else, it's only evaluated if None. Doesn't really matter since it's just a test.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point. I'd lean towards legibility > (imo premature) optimization in this case, but am fine either way.

Comment threadlightning/src/routing/gossip.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/routing/scoring.rs Outdated
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the init-features-user-config branch from a6c69b0 to 69fd9d0CompareJanuary 13, 2023 23:12
@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Jan 13, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Base: 90.73% // Head: 90.70% // Decreases project coverage by -0.03%⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (69fd9d0) compared to base (ac6e0b3).
Patch coverage: 98.64% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

❗ Current head 69fd9d0 differs from pull request most recent head abf4e79. Consider uploading reports for the commit abf4e79 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1946 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 90.73% 90.70% -0.04% 
==========================================
Files 97 97 Lines 50548 50568 +20 Branches 50548 50568 +20 ==========================================
+ Hits 45864 45866 +2 - Misses 4684 4702 +18 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs96.91% <ø> (-0.15%)⬇️
lightning/src/util/test_utils.rs71.30% <50.00%> (-0.22%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs87.11% <94.54%> (-0.06%)⬇️
lightning/src/routing/router.rs90.91% <94.87%> (+<0.01%)⬆️
lightning/src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs91.49% <96.42%> (+0.02%)⬆️
lightning-background-processor/src/lib.rs95.45% <100.00%> (ø)
lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs89.48% <100.00%> (ø)
lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs97.76% <100.00%> (ø)
lightning-persister/src/lib.rs93.49% <100.00%> (ø)
lightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs97.82% <100.00%> (-0.01%)⬇️
... and 32 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Needs rebase, sorry.

This is purely a refactor that does not change the InitFeatures
advertised by a ChannelManager. This allows users to configure which
features should be advertised based on the values of `UserConfig`. While
there aren't any existing features currently leveraging this behavior,
it will be used by the upcoming anchors_zero_fee_htlc_tx feature.
The UserConfig dependency on provided_init_features caused most
callsites of the main test methods responsible for opening channels to
be updated. This commit foregos that completely by no longer requiring
the InitFeatures of each side to be provided to these methods. The
methods already require a reference to each node's ChannelManager to
open the channel, so we use that same reference to obtain their
InitFeatures. A way to override such features was required for some
tests, so a new `override_init_features` config option now exists on
the test harness.
@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Sorry about the labels. Looks good to me, but I'll rereview after rebase.

@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the init-features-user-config branch from 69fd9d0 to abf4e79CompareJanuary 14, 2023 22:01

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should also do #1954.


let msg = msgs::UnsignedChannelAnnouncement {
features: channelmanager::provided_channel_features(),
features: channelmanager::provided_channel_features(&user_config),

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is fine for now, but we'll need to tweak this further once we get to things like PTLC as we'll need the provided-channel-flags to include some info about the channel_type as well.

let mut accept_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
accept_channel.to_self_delay = 200;
nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), channelmanager::provided_init_features(), &accept_channel);
nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), nodes[0].node.init_features(), &accept_channel);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Heh, finally caught one with the wrong node passed :)

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit de783e0 into lightningdevkit:mainJan 15, 2023
@wpaulino
wpaulino deleted the init-features-user-config branch January 16, 2023 20:24
@wpaulinowpaulino mentioned this pull request Mar 3, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@wpaulino@codecov-commenter@TheBlueMatt@arik-so
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Use UserConfig to determine advertised InitFeatures by ChannelManager - #1946

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:init-features-user-config
Jan 15, 2023
Merged

Use UserConfig to determine advertised InitFeatures by ChannelManager#1946
TheBlueMatt merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:init-features-user-config

Conversation

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This is purely a refactor that does not change the InitFeatures advertised by a ChannelManager. This allows users to configure which features should be advertised based on the values of UserConfig. While there aren't any existing features currently leveraging this behavior, it will be used by the upcoming anchors_zero_fee_htlc_tx feature.

The UserConfig dependency on provided_init_features caused most callsites of the main test methods responsible for opening channels to be updated. This commit foregos that completely by no longer requiring the InitFeatures of each side to be provided to these methods. The methods already require a reference to each node's ChannelManager to open the channel, so we use that same reference to obtain their InitFeatures. A way to override such features was required for some tests, so a new override_init_features config option now exists on the test harness.

Motivated by the discussion in #1860 (comment).

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, thanks. Honestly probably should have done this when the code was added, but oh well. One comment but otherwise LGTM, note CI is failing.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the init-features-user-config branch 3 times, most recently from 07be198 to a6c69b0CompareJanuary 13, 2023 20:04
let open_channel_msg = get_event_msg!(node_a, MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, node_b.node.get_our_node_id());
assert_eq!(open_channel_msg.temporary_channel_id, create_chan_id);
assert_eq!(node_a.node.list_channels().iter().find(|channel| channel.channel_id == create_chan_id).unwrap().user_channel_id, 42);
let a_flags = node_a.override_init_features.borrow().clone().unwrap_or_else(|| node_a.node.init_features());

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

wouldn't unwrap_or do the trick?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

With unwrap_or, its argument will always be evaluated, whereas with unwrap_or_else, it's only evaluated if None. Doesn't really matter since it's just a test.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point. I'd lean towards legibility > (imo premature) optimization in this case, but am fine either way.

Comment threadlightning/src/routing/gossip.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/routing/scoring.rs Outdated
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the init-features-user-config branch from a6c69b0 to 69fd9d0CompareJanuary 13, 2023 23:12
@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Jan 13, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Base: 90.73% // Head: 90.70% // Decreases project coverage by -0.03%⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (69fd9d0) compared to base (ac6e0b3).
Patch coverage: 98.64% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

❗ Current head 69fd9d0 differs from pull request most recent head abf4e79. Consider uploading reports for the commit abf4e79 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1946 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 90.73% 90.70% -0.04% 
==========================================
Files 97 97 Lines 50548 50568 +20 Branches 50548 50568 +20 ==========================================
+ Hits 45864 45866 +2 - Misses 4684 4702 +18 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs96.91% <ø> (-0.15%)⬇️
lightning/src/util/test_utils.rs71.30% <50.00%> (-0.22%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs87.11% <94.54%> (-0.06%)⬇️
lightning/src/routing/router.rs90.91% <94.87%> (+<0.01%)⬆️
lightning/src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs91.49% <96.42%> (+0.02%)⬆️
lightning-background-processor/src/lib.rs95.45% <100.00%> (ø)
lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs89.48% <100.00%> (ø)
lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs97.76% <100.00%> (ø)
lightning-persister/src/lib.rs93.49% <100.00%> (ø)
lightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs97.82% <100.00%> (-0.01%)⬇️
... and 32 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Needs rebase, sorry.

This is purely a refactor that does not change the InitFeatures
advertised by a ChannelManager. This allows users to configure which
features should be advertised based on the values of `UserConfig`. While
there aren't any existing features currently leveraging this behavior,
it will be used by the upcoming anchors_zero_fee_htlc_tx feature.
The UserConfig dependency on provided_init_features caused most
callsites of the main test methods responsible for opening channels to
be updated. This commit foregos that completely by no longer requiring
the InitFeatures of each side to be provided to these methods. The
methods already require a reference to each node's ChannelManager to
open the channel, so we use that same reference to obtain their
InitFeatures. A way to override such features was required for some
tests, so a new `override_init_features` config option now exists on
the test harness.
@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Sorry about the labels. Looks good to me, but I'll rereview after rebase.

@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the init-features-user-config branch from 69fd9d0 to abf4e79CompareJanuary 14, 2023 22:01

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should also do #1954.


let msg = msgs::UnsignedChannelAnnouncement {
features: channelmanager::provided_channel_features(),
features: channelmanager::provided_channel_features(&user_config),

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is fine for now, but we'll need to tweak this further once we get to things like PTLC as we'll need the provided-channel-flags to include some info about the channel_type as well.

let mut accept_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
accept_channel.to_self_delay = 200;
nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), channelmanager::provided_init_features(), &accept_channel);
nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), nodes[0].node.init_features(), &accept_channel);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Heh, finally caught one with the wrong node passed :)

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit de783e0 into lightningdevkit:mainJan 15, 2023
@wpaulino
wpaulino deleted the init-features-user-config branch January 16, 2023 20:24
@wpaulinowpaulino mentioned this pull request Mar 3, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@wpaulino@codecov-commenter@TheBlueMatt@arik-so
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Use UserConfig to determine advertised InitFeatures by ChannelManager - #1946

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:init-features-user-config
Jan 15, 2023
Merged

Use UserConfig to determine advertised InitFeatures by ChannelManager#1946
TheBlueMatt merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:init-features-user-config

Conversation

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This is purely a refactor that does not change the InitFeatures advertised by a ChannelManager. This allows users to configure which features should be advertised based on the values of UserConfig. While there aren't any existing features currently leveraging this behavior, it will be used by the upcoming anchors_zero_fee_htlc_tx feature.

The UserConfig dependency on provided_init_features caused most callsites of the main test methods responsible for opening channels to be updated. This commit foregos that completely by no longer requiring the InitFeatures of each side to be provided to these methods. The methods already require a reference to each node's ChannelManager to open the channel, so we use that same reference to obtain their InitFeatures. A way to override such features was required for some tests, so a new override_init_features config option now exists on the test harness.

Motivated by the discussion in #1860 (comment).

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, thanks. Honestly probably should have done this when the code was added, but oh well. One comment but otherwise LGTM, note CI is failing.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the init-features-user-config branch 3 times, most recently from 07be198 to a6c69b0CompareJanuary 13, 2023 20:04
let open_channel_msg = get_event_msg!(node_a, MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, node_b.node.get_our_node_id());
assert_eq!(open_channel_msg.temporary_channel_id, create_chan_id);
assert_eq!(node_a.node.list_channels().iter().find(|channel| channel.channel_id == create_chan_id).unwrap().user_channel_id, 42);
let a_flags = node_a.override_init_features.borrow().clone().unwrap_or_else(|| node_a.node.init_features());

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

wouldn't unwrap_or do the trick?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

With unwrap_or, its argument will always be evaluated, whereas with unwrap_or_else, it's only evaluated if None. Doesn't really matter since it's just a test.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point. I'd lean towards legibility > (imo premature) optimization in this case, but am fine either way.

Comment threadlightning/src/routing/gossip.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/routing/scoring.rs Outdated
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the init-features-user-config branch from a6c69b0 to 69fd9d0CompareJanuary 13, 2023 23:12
@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Jan 13, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Base: 90.73% // Head: 90.70% // Decreases project coverage by -0.03%⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (69fd9d0) compared to base (ac6e0b3).
Patch coverage: 98.64% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

❗ Current head 69fd9d0 differs from pull request most recent head abf4e79. Consider uploading reports for the commit abf4e79 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1946 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 90.73% 90.70% -0.04% 
==========================================
Files 97 97 Lines 50548 50568 +20 Branches 50548 50568 +20 ==========================================
+ Hits 45864 45866 +2 - Misses 4684 4702 +18 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs96.91% <ø> (-0.15%)⬇️
lightning/src/util/test_utils.rs71.30% <50.00%> (-0.22%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs87.11% <94.54%> (-0.06%)⬇️
lightning/src/routing/router.rs90.91% <94.87%> (+<0.01%)⬆️
lightning/src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs91.49% <96.42%> (+0.02%)⬆️
lightning-background-processor/src/lib.rs95.45% <100.00%> (ø)
lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs89.48% <100.00%> (ø)
lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs97.76% <100.00%> (ø)
lightning-persister/src/lib.rs93.49% <100.00%> (ø)
lightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs97.82% <100.00%> (-0.01%)⬇️
... and 32 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Needs rebase, sorry.

This is purely a refactor that does not change the InitFeatures
advertised by a ChannelManager. This allows users to configure which
features should be advertised based on the values of `UserConfig`. While
there aren't any existing features currently leveraging this behavior,
it will be used by the upcoming anchors_zero_fee_htlc_tx feature.
The UserConfig dependency on provided_init_features caused most
callsites of the main test methods responsible for opening channels to
be updated. This commit foregos that completely by no longer requiring
the InitFeatures of each side to be provided to these methods. The
methods already require a reference to each node's ChannelManager to
open the channel, so we use that same reference to obtain their
InitFeatures. A way to override such features was required for some
tests, so a new `override_init_features` config option now exists on
the test harness.
@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Sorry about the labels. Looks good to me, but I'll rereview after rebase.

@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the init-features-user-config branch from 69fd9d0 to abf4e79CompareJanuary 14, 2023 22:01

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should also do #1954.


let msg = msgs::UnsignedChannelAnnouncement {
features: channelmanager::provided_channel_features(),
features: channelmanager::provided_channel_features(&user_config),

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is fine for now, but we'll need to tweak this further once we get to things like PTLC as we'll need the provided-channel-flags to include some info about the channel_type as well.

let mut accept_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
accept_channel.to_self_delay = 200;
nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), channelmanager::provided_init_features(), &accept_channel);
nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), nodes[0].node.init_features(), &accept_channel);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Heh, finally caught one with the wrong node passed :)

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit de783e0 into lightningdevkit:mainJan 15, 2023
@wpaulino
wpaulino deleted the init-features-user-config branch January 16, 2023 20:24
@wpaulinowpaulino mentioned this pull request Mar 3, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@wpaulino@codecov-commenter@TheBlueMatt@arik-so
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Use UserConfig to determine advertised InitFeatures by ChannelManager - #1946

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:init-features-user-config
Jan 15, 2023
Merged

Use UserConfig to determine advertised InitFeatures by ChannelManager#1946
TheBlueMatt merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:init-features-user-config

Conversation

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This is purely a refactor that does not change the InitFeatures advertised by a ChannelManager. This allows users to configure which features should be advertised based on the values of UserConfig. While there aren't any existing features currently leveraging this behavior, it will be used by the upcoming anchors_zero_fee_htlc_tx feature.

The UserConfig dependency on provided_init_features caused most callsites of the main test methods responsible for opening channels to be updated. This commit foregos that completely by no longer requiring the InitFeatures of each side to be provided to these methods. The methods already require a reference to each node's ChannelManager to open the channel, so we use that same reference to obtain their InitFeatures. A way to override such features was required for some tests, so a new override_init_features config option now exists on the test harness.

Motivated by the discussion in #1860 (comment).

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, thanks. Honestly probably should have done this when the code was added, but oh well. One comment but otherwise LGTM, note CI is failing.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the init-features-user-config branch 3 times, most recently from 07be198 to a6c69b0CompareJanuary 13, 2023 20:04
let open_channel_msg = get_event_msg!(node_a, MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, node_b.node.get_our_node_id());
assert_eq!(open_channel_msg.temporary_channel_id, create_chan_id);
assert_eq!(node_a.node.list_channels().iter().find(|channel| channel.channel_id == create_chan_id).unwrap().user_channel_id, 42);
let a_flags = node_a.override_init_features.borrow().clone().unwrap_or_else(|| node_a.node.init_features());

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

wouldn't unwrap_or do the trick?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

With unwrap_or, its argument will always be evaluated, whereas with unwrap_or_else, it's only evaluated if None. Doesn't really matter since it's just a test.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point. I'd lean towards legibility > (imo premature) optimization in this case, but am fine either way.

Comment threadlightning/src/routing/gossip.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/routing/scoring.rs Outdated
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the init-features-user-config branch from a6c69b0 to 69fd9d0CompareJanuary 13, 2023 23:12
@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Jan 13, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Base: 90.73% // Head: 90.70% // Decreases project coverage by -0.03%⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (69fd9d0) compared to base (ac6e0b3).
Patch coverage: 98.64% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

❗ Current head 69fd9d0 differs from pull request most recent head abf4e79. Consider uploading reports for the commit abf4e79 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1946 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 90.73% 90.70% -0.04% 
==========================================
Files 97 97 Lines 50548 50568 +20 Branches 50548 50568 +20 ==========================================
+ Hits 45864 45866 +2 - Misses 4684 4702 +18 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs96.91% <ø> (-0.15%)⬇️
lightning/src/util/test_utils.rs71.30% <50.00%> (-0.22%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs87.11% <94.54%> (-0.06%)⬇️
lightning/src/routing/router.rs90.91% <94.87%> (+<0.01%)⬆️
lightning/src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs91.49% <96.42%> (+0.02%)⬆️
lightning-background-processor/src/lib.rs95.45% <100.00%> (ø)
lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs89.48% <100.00%> (ø)
lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs97.76% <100.00%> (ø)
lightning-persister/src/lib.rs93.49% <100.00%> (ø)
lightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs97.82% <100.00%> (-0.01%)⬇️
... and 32 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Needs rebase, sorry.

This is purely a refactor that does not change the InitFeatures
advertised by a ChannelManager. This allows users to configure which
features should be advertised based on the values of `UserConfig`. While
there aren't any existing features currently leveraging this behavior,
it will be used by the upcoming anchors_zero_fee_htlc_tx feature.
The UserConfig dependency on provided_init_features caused most
callsites of the main test methods responsible for opening channels to
be updated. This commit foregos that completely by no longer requiring
the InitFeatures of each side to be provided to these methods. The
methods already require a reference to each node's ChannelManager to
open the channel, so we use that same reference to obtain their
InitFeatures. A way to override such features was required for some
tests, so a new `override_init_features` config option now exists on
the test harness.
@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Sorry about the labels. Looks good to me, but I'll rereview after rebase.

@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the init-features-user-config branch from 69fd9d0 to abf4e79CompareJanuary 14, 2023 22:01

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should also do #1954.


let msg = msgs::UnsignedChannelAnnouncement {
features: channelmanager::provided_channel_features(),
features: channelmanager::provided_channel_features(&user_config),

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is fine for now, but we'll need to tweak this further once we get to things like PTLC as we'll need the provided-channel-flags to include some info about the channel_type as well.

let mut accept_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
accept_channel.to_self_delay = 200;
nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), channelmanager::provided_init_features(), &accept_channel);
nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), nodes[0].node.init_features(), &accept_channel);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Heh, finally caught one with the wrong node passed :)

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit de783e0 into lightningdevkit:mainJan 15, 2023
@wpaulino
wpaulino deleted the init-features-user-config branch January 16, 2023 20:24
@wpaulinowpaulino mentioned this pull request Mar 3, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@wpaulino@codecov-commenter@TheBlueMatt@arik-so
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Use UserConfig to determine advertised InitFeatures by ChannelManager - #1946

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:init-features-user-config
Jan 15, 2023
Merged

Use UserConfig to determine advertised InitFeatures by ChannelManager#1946
TheBlueMatt merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:init-features-user-config

Conversation

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This is purely a refactor that does not change the InitFeatures advertised by a ChannelManager. This allows users to configure which features should be advertised based on the values of UserConfig. While there aren't any existing features currently leveraging this behavior, it will be used by the upcoming anchors_zero_fee_htlc_tx feature.

The UserConfig dependency on provided_init_features caused most callsites of the main test methods responsible for opening channels to be updated. This commit foregos that completely by no longer requiring the InitFeatures of each side to be provided to these methods. The methods already require a reference to each node's ChannelManager to open the channel, so we use that same reference to obtain their InitFeatures. A way to override such features was required for some tests, so a new override_init_features config option now exists on the test harness.

Motivated by the discussion in #1860 (comment).

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, thanks. Honestly probably should have done this when the code was added, but oh well. One comment but otherwise LGTM, note CI is failing.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the init-features-user-config branch 3 times, most recently from 07be198 to a6c69b0CompareJanuary 13, 2023 20:04
let open_channel_msg = get_event_msg!(node_a, MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, node_b.node.get_our_node_id());
assert_eq!(open_channel_msg.temporary_channel_id, create_chan_id);
assert_eq!(node_a.node.list_channels().iter().find(|channel| channel.channel_id == create_chan_id).unwrap().user_channel_id, 42);
let a_flags = node_a.override_init_features.borrow().clone().unwrap_or_else(|| node_a.node.init_features());

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

wouldn't unwrap_or do the trick?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

With unwrap_or, its argument will always be evaluated, whereas with unwrap_or_else, it's only evaluated if None. Doesn't really matter since it's just a test.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point. I'd lean towards legibility > (imo premature) optimization in this case, but am fine either way.

Comment threadlightning/src/routing/gossip.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/routing/scoring.rs Outdated
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the init-features-user-config branch from a6c69b0 to 69fd9d0CompareJanuary 13, 2023 23:12
@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Jan 13, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Base: 90.73% // Head: 90.70% // Decreases project coverage by -0.03%⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (69fd9d0) compared to base (ac6e0b3).
Patch coverage: 98.64% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

❗ Current head 69fd9d0 differs from pull request most recent head abf4e79. Consider uploading reports for the commit abf4e79 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1946 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 90.73% 90.70% -0.04% 
==========================================
Files 97 97 Lines 50548 50568 +20 Branches 50548 50568 +20 ==========================================
+ Hits 45864 45866 +2 - Misses 4684 4702 +18 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs96.91% <ø> (-0.15%)⬇️
lightning/src/util/test_utils.rs71.30% <50.00%> (-0.22%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs87.11% <94.54%> (-0.06%)⬇️
lightning/src/routing/router.rs90.91% <94.87%> (+<0.01%)⬆️
lightning/src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs91.49% <96.42%> (+0.02%)⬆️
lightning-background-processor/src/lib.rs95.45% <100.00%> (ø)
lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs89.48% <100.00%> (ø)
lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs97.76% <100.00%> (ø)
lightning-persister/src/lib.rs93.49% <100.00%> (ø)
lightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs97.82% <100.00%> (-0.01%)⬇️
... and 32 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Needs rebase, sorry.

This is purely a refactor that does not change the InitFeatures
advertised by a ChannelManager. This allows users to configure which
features should be advertised based on the values of `UserConfig`. While
there aren't any existing features currently leveraging this behavior,
it will be used by the upcoming anchors_zero_fee_htlc_tx feature.
The UserConfig dependency on provided_init_features caused most
callsites of the main test methods responsible for opening channels to
be updated. This commit foregos that completely by no longer requiring
the InitFeatures of each side to be provided to these methods. The
methods already require a reference to each node's ChannelManager to
open the channel, so we use that same reference to obtain their
InitFeatures. A way to override such features was required for some
tests, so a new `override_init_features` config option now exists on
the test harness.
@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Sorry about the labels. Looks good to me, but I'll rereview after rebase.

@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the init-features-user-config branch from 69fd9d0 to abf4e79CompareJanuary 14, 2023 22:01

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should also do #1954.


let msg = msgs::UnsignedChannelAnnouncement {
features: channelmanager::provided_channel_features(),
features: channelmanager::provided_channel_features(&user_config),

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is fine for now, but we'll need to tweak this further once we get to things like PTLC as we'll need the provided-channel-flags to include some info about the channel_type as well.

let mut accept_channel = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendAcceptChannel, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
accept_channel.to_self_delay = 200;
nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), channelmanager::provided_init_features(), &accept_channel);
nodes[0].node.handle_accept_channel(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), nodes[0].node.init_features(), &accept_channel);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Heh, finally caught one with the wrong node passed :)

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit de783e0 into lightningdevkit:mainJan 15, 2023
@wpaulino
wpaulino deleted the init-features-user-config branch January 16, 2023 20:24
@wpaulinowpaulino mentioned this pull request Mar 3, 2023
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@wpaulino@codecov-commenter@TheBlueMatt@arik-so