Skip to content

Use sign_holder_htlc_transaction to sign non-anchors holder HTLCs - #2667

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 6 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors
Oct 20, 2023
Merged

Use sign_holder_htlc_transaction to sign non-anchors holder HTLCs#2667
TheBlueMatt merged 6 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors

Conversation

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We want to ensure we use fresh random signatures to prevent certain classes of transaction replacement attacks at the bitcoin P2P layer. This was already covered for commitment transactions and zero fee holder HTLC transactions, but was missing for holder HTLC transactions on non-anchors channels due to a signature cache. This PR removed said cache completely and switches to signing holder HTLCs with the existing sign_holder_htlc_transaction signing method, previously only used for anchor channels.

Comment threadlightning/src/events/bump_transaction.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs
@wpaulinowpaulino added this to the 0.0.118 milestone Oct 17, 2023

@ariardariard left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Re-broadcasting at every block still means every competing replacement must at least commit feerate in mempool

Comment threadlightning/src/sign/mod.rs Outdated
We plan to use `EcdsaChannelSigner::sign_holder_htlc_transaction` to
also sign holder HTLC transactions on non-anchor outputs channels.
`HTLCDescriptor` was only used in an anchor outputs context, so a few
things needed changing, mostly to handle the different scripts and
feerate.
`OnchainTxHandler` will need to construct `HTLCDescriptor`s for holder
HTLCs, but it did not have access to all of the derivation parameters
that need to be provided.
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors branch from 4f1d1f8 to dc1c232CompareOctober 20, 2023 18:06
@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Oct 20, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: 27 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (b1d3aa8) 89.06% compared to head (a5fd95d) 88.72%.
Report is 62 commits behind head on main.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #2667 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 89.06% 88.72% -0.34% 
==========================================
Files 112 112 Lines 87417 88365 +948 Branches 87417 88365 +948 ==========================================
+ Hits 77856 78405 +549 - Misses 7322 7718 +396 - Partials 2239 2242 +3 
FilesCoverage Δ
lightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs84.91% <100.00%> (+0.01%)⬆️
lightning/src/events/bump_transaction.rs82.86% <ø> (+0.52%)⬆️
lightning/src/ln/chan_utils.rs91.02% <100.00%> (-1.19%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/channel.rs88.38% <ø> (+0.01%)⬆️
lightning/src/util/test_channel_signer.rs85.18% <92.30%> (-0.90%)⬇️
lightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs80.13% <92.30%> (-1.72%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs98.01% <95.69%> (-0.54%)⬇️
lightning/src/sign/mod.rs74.86% <80.68%> (+0.07%)⬆️

... and 36 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt previously approved these changes Oct 20, 2023
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/chan_utils.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/chan_utils.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/chan_utils.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/sign/mod.rs
@jkczyz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Looks good after a couple minor comments. Much more mechanical than I first thought.

@ariard

Copy link
Copy Markdown

won’t have time to review further, though test coverage sounds good from previous look.

@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors branch 2 times, most recently from c171169 to 225a860CompareOctober 20, 2023 21:55
Comment threadlightning/src/sign/mod.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/sign/mod.rs
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors branch from 225a860 to a5fd95dCompareOctober 20, 2023 22:09
jkczyz
jkczyz previously approved these changes Oct 20, 2023
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs Outdated
We want to ensure we use fresh random signatures to prevent certain
classes of transaction replacement attacks at the bitcoin P2P layer.
This was already covered for commitment transactions and zero fee holder
HTLC transactions, but was missing for holder HTLC transactions on
non-anchors channels.
We can easily do this by reusing the existing
`EcdsaChannelSigner::sign_holder_htlc_transaction` method and
circumventing the existing `holder_htlc_sigs/prev_holder_htlc_sigs`
caches, which will be removed in a later commit anyway.
Since we want our holder HTLC signatures to be randomly generated and
not reused, our existing caches are useless now, so we opt to remove
them.
`sign_holder_commitment_and_htlcs` never really made sense. Unlike
`sign_counterparty_commitment`, the signatures for holder HTLC
transactions may be required much later than the commitment
transaction's. While it was nice for us to only reach the signer once to
obtain all holder signatures, it's not really ideal anymore as we want
our signatures to be random and not reused.
We no longer return all holder HTLC signatures and instead defer to
obtaining them via `EcdsaChannelSigner::sign_holder_htlc_transaction`.
Now that `HTLCDescriptor` is no longer specific to anchors, it doesn't
make sense for it to live in the `bump_transaction` module anymore.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit a1a2f2a into lightningdevkit:mainOct 20, 2023
@wpaulino
wpaulino deleted the random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors branch October 20, 2023 23:25
PXplod pushed a commit to bitlightlabs/rust-lightning that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2024
0.0.118 - Oct 23, 2023 - "Just the Twelve Sinks"
API Updates
===========
* BOLT12 sending and receiving is now supported as an alpha feature. You may
run into unexpected issues and will need to have a direct connection with
the offer's blinded path introduction points as messages are not yet routed.
We are seeking feedback from early testers (lightningdevkit#2578, lightningdevkit#2039).
* `ConfirmationTarget` has been rewritten to provide information about the
specific use LDK needs the feerate estimate for, rather than the generic
low-, medium-, and high-priority estimates. This allows LDK users to more
accurately target their feerate estimates (lightningdevkit#2660). For those wishing to
retain their existing behavior, see the table below for conversion.
* `ChainHash` is now used in place of `BlockHash` where it represents the
genesis block (lightningdevkit#2662).
* `lightning-invoice` payment utilities now take a `Deref` to
`AChannelManager` (lightningdevkit#2652).
* `peel_onion` is provided to statelessly decode an `OnionMessage` (lightningdevkit#2599).
* `ToSocketAddrs` + `Display` are now impl'd for `SocketAddress` (lightningdevkit#2636, lightningdevkit#2670)
* `Display` is now implemented for `OutPoint` (lightningdevkit#2649).
* `Features::from_be_bytes` is now provided (lightningdevkit#2640).
For those moving to the new `ConfirmationTarget`, the new variants in terms of
the old mempool/low/medium/high priorities are as follows:
* `OnChainSweep` = `HighPriority`
* `MaxAllowedNonAnchorChannelRemoteFee` = `max(25 * 250, HighPriority * 10)`
* `MinAllowedAnchorChannelRemoteFee` = `MempoolMinimum`
* `MinAllowedNonAnchorChannelRemoteFee` = `Background - 250`
* `AnchorChannelFee` = `Background`
* `NonAnchorChannelFee` = `Normal`
* `ChannelCloseMinimum` = `Background`
Bug Fixes
=========
* Calling `ChannelManager::close_channel[_with_feerate_and_script]` on a
channel which did not exist would immediately hang holding several key
`ChannelManager`-internal locks (lightningdevkit#2657).
* Channel information updates received from a failing HTLC are no longer
applied to our `NetworkGraph`. This prevents a node which we attempted to
route a payment through from being able to learn the sender of the payment.
In some rare cases, this may result in marginally reduced payment success
rates (lightningdevkit#2666).
* Anchor outputs are now properly considered when calculating the amount
available to send in HTLCs. This can prevent force-closes in anchor channels
when sending payments which overflow the available balance (lightningdevkit#2674).
* A peer that sends an `update_fulfill_htlc` message for a forwarded HTLC,
then reconnects prior to sending a `commitment_signed` (thus retransmitting
their `update_fulfill_htlc`) may result in the channel stalling and being
unable to make progress (lightningdevkit#2661).
* In exceedingly rare circumstances, messages intended to be sent to a peer
prior to reconnection can be sent after reconnection. This could result in
undefined channel state and force-closes (lightningdevkit#2663).
Backwards Compatibility
=======================
* Creating a blinded path to receive a payment then downgrading to LDK prior to
0.0.117 may result in failure to receive the payment (lightningdevkit#2413).
* Calling `ChannelManager::pay_for_offer` or
`ChannelManager::create_refund_builder` may prevent downgrading to LDK prior
to 0.0.118 until the payment times out and has been removed (lightningdevkit#2039).
Node Compatibility
==================
* LDK now sends a bogus `channel_reestablish` message to peers when they ask to
resume an unknown channel. This should cause LND nodes to force-close and
broadcast the latest channel state to the chain. In order to trigger this
when we wish to force-close a channel, LDK now disconnects immediately after
sending a channel-closing `error` message. This should result in cooperative
peers also working to confirm the latest commitment transaction when we wish
to force-close (lightningdevkit#2658).
Security
========
0.0.118 expands mitigations against transaction cycling attacks to non-anchor
channels, though note that no mitigations which exist today are considered robust
to prevent the class of attacks.
* In order to mitigate against transaction cycling attacks, non-anchor HTLC
transactions are now properly re-signed before broadcasting (lightningdevkit#2667).
In total, this release features 61 files changed, 3470 insertions, 1503
deletions in 85 commits from 12 authors, in alphabetical order:
* Antonio Yang
* Elias Rohrer
* Evan Feenstra
* Fedeparma74
* Gursharan Singh
* Jeffrey Czyz
* Matt Corallo
* Sergi Delgado Segura
* Vladimir Fomene
* Wilmer Paulino
* benthecarman
* slanesuke
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@wpaulino@codecov-commenter@jkczyz@ariard@TheBlueMatt@arik-so
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Use sign_holder_htlc_transaction to sign non-anchors holder HTLCs by wpaulino · Pull Request #2667 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

Use sign_holder_htlc_transaction to sign non-anchors holder HTLCs - #2667

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 6 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors
Oct 20, 2023
Merged

Use sign_holder_htlc_transaction to sign non-anchors holder HTLCs#2667
TheBlueMatt merged 6 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors

Conversation

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We want to ensure we use fresh random signatures to prevent certain classes of transaction replacement attacks at the bitcoin P2P layer. This was already covered for commitment transactions and zero fee holder HTLC transactions, but was missing for holder HTLC transactions on non-anchors channels due to a signature cache. This PR removed said cache completely and switches to signing holder HTLCs with the existing sign_holder_htlc_transaction signing method, previously only used for anchor channels.

Comment threadlightning/src/events/bump_transaction.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs
@wpaulinowpaulino added this to the 0.0.118 milestone Oct 17, 2023

@ariardariard left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Re-broadcasting at every block still means every competing replacement must at least commit feerate in mempool

Comment threadlightning/src/sign/mod.rs Outdated
We plan to use `EcdsaChannelSigner::sign_holder_htlc_transaction` to
also sign holder HTLC transactions on non-anchor outputs channels.
`HTLCDescriptor` was only used in an anchor outputs context, so a few
things needed changing, mostly to handle the different scripts and
feerate.
`OnchainTxHandler` will need to construct `HTLCDescriptor`s for holder
HTLCs, but it did not have access to all of the derivation parameters
that need to be provided.
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors branch from 4f1d1f8 to dc1c232CompareOctober 20, 2023 18:06
@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Oct 20, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: 27 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (b1d3aa8) 89.06% compared to head (a5fd95d) 88.72%.
Report is 62 commits behind head on main.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #2667 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 89.06% 88.72% -0.34% 
==========================================
Files 112 112 Lines 87417 88365 +948 Branches 87417 88365 +948 ==========================================
+ Hits 77856 78405 +549 - Misses 7322 7718 +396 - Partials 2239 2242 +3 
FilesCoverage Δ
lightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs84.91% <100.00%> (+0.01%)⬆️
lightning/src/events/bump_transaction.rs82.86% <ø> (+0.52%)⬆️
lightning/src/ln/chan_utils.rs91.02% <100.00%> (-1.19%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/channel.rs88.38% <ø> (+0.01%)⬆️
lightning/src/util/test_channel_signer.rs85.18% <92.30%> (-0.90%)⬇️
lightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs80.13% <92.30%> (-1.72%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs98.01% <95.69%> (-0.54%)⬇️
lightning/src/sign/mod.rs74.86% <80.68%> (+0.07%)⬆️

... and 36 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt previously approved these changes Oct 20, 2023
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/chan_utils.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/chan_utils.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/chan_utils.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/sign/mod.rs
@jkczyz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Looks good after a couple minor comments. Much more mechanical than I first thought.

@ariard

Copy link
Copy Markdown

won’t have time to review further, though test coverage sounds good from previous look.

@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors branch 2 times, most recently from c171169 to 225a860CompareOctober 20, 2023 21:55
Comment threadlightning/src/sign/mod.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/sign/mod.rs
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors branch from 225a860 to a5fd95dCompareOctober 20, 2023 22:09
jkczyz
jkczyz previously approved these changes Oct 20, 2023
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs Outdated
We want to ensure we use fresh random signatures to prevent certain
classes of transaction replacement attacks at the bitcoin P2P layer.
This was already covered for commitment transactions and zero fee holder
HTLC transactions, but was missing for holder HTLC transactions on
non-anchors channels.
We can easily do this by reusing the existing
`EcdsaChannelSigner::sign_holder_htlc_transaction` method and
circumventing the existing `holder_htlc_sigs/prev_holder_htlc_sigs`
caches, which will be removed in a later commit anyway.
Since we want our holder HTLC signatures to be randomly generated and
not reused, our existing caches are useless now, so we opt to remove
them.
`sign_holder_commitment_and_htlcs` never really made sense. Unlike
`sign_counterparty_commitment`, the signatures for holder HTLC
transactions may be required much later than the commitment
transaction's. While it was nice for us to only reach the signer once to
obtain all holder signatures, it's not really ideal anymore as we want
our signatures to be random and not reused.
We no longer return all holder HTLC signatures and instead defer to
obtaining them via `EcdsaChannelSigner::sign_holder_htlc_transaction`.
Now that `HTLCDescriptor` is no longer specific to anchors, it doesn't
make sense for it to live in the `bump_transaction` module anymore.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit a1a2f2a into lightningdevkit:mainOct 20, 2023
@wpaulino
wpaulino deleted the random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors branch October 20, 2023 23:25
PXplod pushed a commit to bitlightlabs/rust-lightning that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2024
0.0.118 - Oct 23, 2023 - "Just the Twelve Sinks"
API Updates
===========
* BOLT12 sending and receiving is now supported as an alpha feature. You may
run into unexpected issues and will need to have a direct connection with
the offer's blinded path introduction points as messages are not yet routed.
We are seeking feedback from early testers (lightningdevkit#2578, lightningdevkit#2039).
* `ConfirmationTarget` has been rewritten to provide information about the
specific use LDK needs the feerate estimate for, rather than the generic
low-, medium-, and high-priority estimates. This allows LDK users to more
accurately target their feerate estimates (lightningdevkit#2660). For those wishing to
retain their existing behavior, see the table below for conversion.
* `ChainHash` is now used in place of `BlockHash` where it represents the
genesis block (lightningdevkit#2662).
* `lightning-invoice` payment utilities now take a `Deref` to
`AChannelManager` (lightningdevkit#2652).
* `peel_onion` is provided to statelessly decode an `OnionMessage` (lightningdevkit#2599).
* `ToSocketAddrs` + `Display` are now impl'd for `SocketAddress` (lightningdevkit#2636, lightningdevkit#2670)
* `Display` is now implemented for `OutPoint` (lightningdevkit#2649).
* `Features::from_be_bytes` is now provided (lightningdevkit#2640).
For those moving to the new `ConfirmationTarget`, the new variants in terms of
the old mempool/low/medium/high priorities are as follows:
* `OnChainSweep` = `HighPriority`
* `MaxAllowedNonAnchorChannelRemoteFee` = `max(25 * 250, HighPriority * 10)`
* `MinAllowedAnchorChannelRemoteFee` = `MempoolMinimum`
* `MinAllowedNonAnchorChannelRemoteFee` = `Background - 250`
* `AnchorChannelFee` = `Background`
* `NonAnchorChannelFee` = `Normal`
* `ChannelCloseMinimum` = `Background`
Bug Fixes
=========
* Calling `ChannelManager::close_channel[_with_feerate_and_script]` on a
channel which did not exist would immediately hang holding several key
`ChannelManager`-internal locks (lightningdevkit#2657).
* Channel information updates received from a failing HTLC are no longer
applied to our `NetworkGraph`. This prevents a node which we attempted to
route a payment through from being able to learn the sender of the payment.
In some rare cases, this may result in marginally reduced payment success
rates (lightningdevkit#2666).
* Anchor outputs are now properly considered when calculating the amount
available to send in HTLCs. This can prevent force-closes in anchor channels
when sending payments which overflow the available balance (lightningdevkit#2674).
* A peer that sends an `update_fulfill_htlc` message for a forwarded HTLC,
then reconnects prior to sending a `commitment_signed` (thus retransmitting
their `update_fulfill_htlc`) may result in the channel stalling and being
unable to make progress (lightningdevkit#2661).
* In exceedingly rare circumstances, messages intended to be sent to a peer
prior to reconnection can be sent after reconnection. This could result in
undefined channel state and force-closes (lightningdevkit#2663).
Backwards Compatibility
=======================
* Creating a blinded path to receive a payment then downgrading to LDK prior to
0.0.117 may result in failure to receive the payment (lightningdevkit#2413).
* Calling `ChannelManager::pay_for_offer` or
`ChannelManager::create_refund_builder` may prevent downgrading to LDK prior
to 0.0.118 until the payment times out and has been removed (lightningdevkit#2039).
Node Compatibility
==================
* LDK now sends a bogus `channel_reestablish` message to peers when they ask to
resume an unknown channel. This should cause LND nodes to force-close and
broadcast the latest channel state to the chain. In order to trigger this
when we wish to force-close a channel, LDK now disconnects immediately after
sending a channel-closing `error` message. This should result in cooperative
peers also working to confirm the latest commitment transaction when we wish
to force-close (lightningdevkit#2658).
Security
========
0.0.118 expands mitigations against transaction cycling attacks to non-anchor
channels, though note that no mitigations which exist today are considered robust
to prevent the class of attacks.
* In order to mitigate against transaction cycling attacks, non-anchor HTLC
transactions are now properly re-signed before broadcasting (lightningdevkit#2667).
In total, this release features 61 files changed, 3470 insertions, 1503
deletions in 85 commits from 12 authors, in alphabetical order:
* Antonio Yang
* Elias Rohrer
* Evan Feenstra
* Fedeparma74
* Gursharan Singh
* Jeffrey Czyz
* Matt Corallo
* Sergi Delgado Segura
* Vladimir Fomene
* Wilmer Paulino
* benthecarman
* slanesuke
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@wpaulino@codecov-commenter@jkczyz@ariard@TheBlueMatt@arik-so
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Use sign_holder_htlc_transaction to sign non-anchors holder HTLCs by wpaulino · Pull Request #2667 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

Use sign_holder_htlc_transaction to sign non-anchors holder HTLCs - #2667

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 6 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors
Oct 20, 2023
Merged

Use sign_holder_htlc_transaction to sign non-anchors holder HTLCs#2667
TheBlueMatt merged 6 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors

Conversation

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We want to ensure we use fresh random signatures to prevent certain classes of transaction replacement attacks at the bitcoin P2P layer. This was already covered for commitment transactions and zero fee holder HTLC transactions, but was missing for holder HTLC transactions on non-anchors channels due to a signature cache. This PR removed said cache completely and switches to signing holder HTLCs with the existing sign_holder_htlc_transaction signing method, previously only used for anchor channels.

Comment threadlightning/src/events/bump_transaction.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs
@wpaulinowpaulino added this to the 0.0.118 milestone Oct 17, 2023

@ariardariard left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Re-broadcasting at every block still means every competing replacement must at least commit feerate in mempool

Comment threadlightning/src/sign/mod.rs Outdated
We plan to use `EcdsaChannelSigner::sign_holder_htlc_transaction` to
also sign holder HTLC transactions on non-anchor outputs channels.
`HTLCDescriptor` was only used in an anchor outputs context, so a few
things needed changing, mostly to handle the different scripts and
feerate.
`OnchainTxHandler` will need to construct `HTLCDescriptor`s for holder
HTLCs, but it did not have access to all of the derivation parameters
that need to be provided.
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors branch from 4f1d1f8 to dc1c232CompareOctober 20, 2023 18:06
@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Oct 20, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: 27 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (b1d3aa8) 89.06% compared to head (a5fd95d) 88.72%.
Report is 62 commits behind head on main.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #2667 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 89.06% 88.72% -0.34% 
==========================================
Files 112 112 Lines 87417 88365 +948 Branches 87417 88365 +948 ==========================================
+ Hits 77856 78405 +549 - Misses 7322 7718 +396 - Partials 2239 2242 +3 
FilesCoverage Δ
lightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs84.91% <100.00%> (+0.01%)⬆️
lightning/src/events/bump_transaction.rs82.86% <ø> (+0.52%)⬆️
lightning/src/ln/chan_utils.rs91.02% <100.00%> (-1.19%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/channel.rs88.38% <ø> (+0.01%)⬆️
lightning/src/util/test_channel_signer.rs85.18% <92.30%> (-0.90%)⬇️
lightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs80.13% <92.30%> (-1.72%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs98.01% <95.69%> (-0.54%)⬇️
lightning/src/sign/mod.rs74.86% <80.68%> (+0.07%)⬆️

... and 36 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt previously approved these changes Oct 20, 2023
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/chan_utils.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/chan_utils.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/chan_utils.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/sign/mod.rs
@jkczyz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Looks good after a couple minor comments. Much more mechanical than I first thought.

@ariard

Copy link
Copy Markdown

won’t have time to review further, though test coverage sounds good from previous look.

@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors branch 2 times, most recently from c171169 to 225a860CompareOctober 20, 2023 21:55
Comment threadlightning/src/sign/mod.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/sign/mod.rs
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors branch from 225a860 to a5fd95dCompareOctober 20, 2023 22:09
jkczyz
jkczyz previously approved these changes Oct 20, 2023
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs Outdated
We want to ensure we use fresh random signatures to prevent certain
classes of transaction replacement attacks at the bitcoin P2P layer.
This was already covered for commitment transactions and zero fee holder
HTLC transactions, but was missing for holder HTLC transactions on
non-anchors channels.
We can easily do this by reusing the existing
`EcdsaChannelSigner::sign_holder_htlc_transaction` method and
circumventing the existing `holder_htlc_sigs/prev_holder_htlc_sigs`
caches, which will be removed in a later commit anyway.
Since we want our holder HTLC signatures to be randomly generated and
not reused, our existing caches are useless now, so we opt to remove
them.
`sign_holder_commitment_and_htlcs` never really made sense. Unlike
`sign_counterparty_commitment`, the signatures for holder HTLC
transactions may be required much later than the commitment
transaction's. While it was nice for us to only reach the signer once to
obtain all holder signatures, it's not really ideal anymore as we want
our signatures to be random and not reused.
We no longer return all holder HTLC signatures and instead defer to
obtaining them via `EcdsaChannelSigner::sign_holder_htlc_transaction`.
Now that `HTLCDescriptor` is no longer specific to anchors, it doesn't
make sense for it to live in the `bump_transaction` module anymore.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit a1a2f2a into lightningdevkit:mainOct 20, 2023
@wpaulino
wpaulino deleted the random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors branch October 20, 2023 23:25
PXplod pushed a commit to bitlightlabs/rust-lightning that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2024
0.0.118 - Oct 23, 2023 - "Just the Twelve Sinks"
API Updates
===========
* BOLT12 sending and receiving is now supported as an alpha feature. You may
run into unexpected issues and will need to have a direct connection with
the offer's blinded path introduction points as messages are not yet routed.
We are seeking feedback from early testers (lightningdevkit#2578, lightningdevkit#2039).
* `ConfirmationTarget` has been rewritten to provide information about the
specific use LDK needs the feerate estimate for, rather than the generic
low-, medium-, and high-priority estimates. This allows LDK users to more
accurately target their feerate estimates (lightningdevkit#2660). For those wishing to
retain their existing behavior, see the table below for conversion.
* `ChainHash` is now used in place of `BlockHash` where it represents the
genesis block (lightningdevkit#2662).
* `lightning-invoice` payment utilities now take a `Deref` to
`AChannelManager` (lightningdevkit#2652).
* `peel_onion` is provided to statelessly decode an `OnionMessage` (lightningdevkit#2599).
* `ToSocketAddrs` + `Display` are now impl'd for `SocketAddress` (lightningdevkit#2636, lightningdevkit#2670)
* `Display` is now implemented for `OutPoint` (lightningdevkit#2649).
* `Features::from_be_bytes` is now provided (lightningdevkit#2640).
For those moving to the new `ConfirmationTarget`, the new variants in terms of
the old mempool/low/medium/high priorities are as follows:
* `OnChainSweep` = `HighPriority`
* `MaxAllowedNonAnchorChannelRemoteFee` = `max(25 * 250, HighPriority * 10)`
* `MinAllowedAnchorChannelRemoteFee` = `MempoolMinimum`
* `MinAllowedNonAnchorChannelRemoteFee` = `Background - 250`
* `AnchorChannelFee` = `Background`
* `NonAnchorChannelFee` = `Normal`
* `ChannelCloseMinimum` = `Background`
Bug Fixes
=========
* Calling `ChannelManager::close_channel[_with_feerate_and_script]` on a
channel which did not exist would immediately hang holding several key
`ChannelManager`-internal locks (lightningdevkit#2657).
* Channel information updates received from a failing HTLC are no longer
applied to our `NetworkGraph`. This prevents a node which we attempted to
route a payment through from being able to learn the sender of the payment.
In some rare cases, this may result in marginally reduced payment success
rates (lightningdevkit#2666).
* Anchor outputs are now properly considered when calculating the amount
available to send in HTLCs. This can prevent force-closes in anchor channels
when sending payments which overflow the available balance (lightningdevkit#2674).
* A peer that sends an `update_fulfill_htlc` message for a forwarded HTLC,
then reconnects prior to sending a `commitment_signed` (thus retransmitting
their `update_fulfill_htlc`) may result in the channel stalling and being
unable to make progress (lightningdevkit#2661).
* In exceedingly rare circumstances, messages intended to be sent to a peer
prior to reconnection can be sent after reconnection. This could result in
undefined channel state and force-closes (lightningdevkit#2663).
Backwards Compatibility
=======================
* Creating a blinded path to receive a payment then downgrading to LDK prior to
0.0.117 may result in failure to receive the payment (lightningdevkit#2413).
* Calling `ChannelManager::pay_for_offer` or
`ChannelManager::create_refund_builder` may prevent downgrading to LDK prior
to 0.0.118 until the payment times out and has been removed (lightningdevkit#2039).
Node Compatibility
==================
* LDK now sends a bogus `channel_reestablish` message to peers when they ask to
resume an unknown channel. This should cause LND nodes to force-close and
broadcast the latest channel state to the chain. In order to trigger this
when we wish to force-close a channel, LDK now disconnects immediately after
sending a channel-closing `error` message. This should result in cooperative
peers also working to confirm the latest commitment transaction when we wish
to force-close (lightningdevkit#2658).
Security
========
0.0.118 expands mitigations against transaction cycling attacks to non-anchor
channels, though note that no mitigations which exist today are considered robust
to prevent the class of attacks.
* In order to mitigate against transaction cycling attacks, non-anchor HTLC
transactions are now properly re-signed before broadcasting (lightningdevkit#2667).
In total, this release features 61 files changed, 3470 insertions, 1503
deletions in 85 commits from 12 authors, in alphabetical order:
* Antonio Yang
* Elias Rohrer
* Evan Feenstra
* Fedeparma74
* Gursharan Singh
* Jeffrey Czyz
* Matt Corallo
* Sergi Delgado Segura
* Vladimir Fomene
* Wilmer Paulino
* benthecarman
* slanesuke
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@wpaulino@codecov-commenter@jkczyz@ariard@TheBlueMatt@arik-so
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Use sign_holder_htlc_transaction to sign non-anchors holder HTLCs by wpaulino · Pull Request #2667 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

Use sign_holder_htlc_transaction to sign non-anchors holder HTLCs - #2667

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 6 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors
Oct 20, 2023
Merged

Use sign_holder_htlc_transaction to sign non-anchors holder HTLCs#2667
TheBlueMatt merged 6 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors

Conversation

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We want to ensure we use fresh random signatures to prevent certain classes of transaction replacement attacks at the bitcoin P2P layer. This was already covered for commitment transactions and zero fee holder HTLC transactions, but was missing for holder HTLC transactions on non-anchors channels due to a signature cache. This PR removed said cache completely and switches to signing holder HTLCs with the existing sign_holder_htlc_transaction signing method, previously only used for anchor channels.

Comment threadlightning/src/events/bump_transaction.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs
@wpaulinowpaulino added this to the 0.0.118 milestone Oct 17, 2023

@ariardariard left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Re-broadcasting at every block still means every competing replacement must at least commit feerate in mempool

Comment threadlightning/src/sign/mod.rs Outdated
We plan to use `EcdsaChannelSigner::sign_holder_htlc_transaction` to
also sign holder HTLC transactions on non-anchor outputs channels.
`HTLCDescriptor` was only used in an anchor outputs context, so a few
things needed changing, mostly to handle the different scripts and
feerate.
`OnchainTxHandler` will need to construct `HTLCDescriptor`s for holder
HTLCs, but it did not have access to all of the derivation parameters
that need to be provided.
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors branch from 4f1d1f8 to dc1c232CompareOctober 20, 2023 18:06
@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Oct 20, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: 27 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (b1d3aa8) 89.06% compared to head (a5fd95d) 88.72%.
Report is 62 commits behind head on main.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #2667 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 89.06% 88.72% -0.34% 
==========================================
Files 112 112 Lines 87417 88365 +948 Branches 87417 88365 +948 ==========================================
+ Hits 77856 78405 +549 - Misses 7322 7718 +396 - Partials 2239 2242 +3 
FilesCoverage Δ
lightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs84.91% <100.00%> (+0.01%)⬆️
lightning/src/events/bump_transaction.rs82.86% <ø> (+0.52%)⬆️
lightning/src/ln/chan_utils.rs91.02% <100.00%> (-1.19%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/channel.rs88.38% <ø> (+0.01%)⬆️
lightning/src/util/test_channel_signer.rs85.18% <92.30%> (-0.90%)⬇️
lightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs80.13% <92.30%> (-1.72%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs98.01% <95.69%> (-0.54%)⬇️
lightning/src/sign/mod.rs74.86% <80.68%> (+0.07%)⬆️

... and 36 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt previously approved these changes Oct 20, 2023
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/chan_utils.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/chan_utils.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/chan_utils.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/sign/mod.rs
@jkczyz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Looks good after a couple minor comments. Much more mechanical than I first thought.

@ariard

Copy link
Copy Markdown

won’t have time to review further, though test coverage sounds good from previous look.

@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors branch 2 times, most recently from c171169 to 225a860CompareOctober 20, 2023 21:55
Comment threadlightning/src/sign/mod.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/sign/mod.rs
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors branch from 225a860 to a5fd95dCompareOctober 20, 2023 22:09
jkczyz
jkczyz previously approved these changes Oct 20, 2023
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs Outdated
We want to ensure we use fresh random signatures to prevent certain
classes of transaction replacement attacks at the bitcoin P2P layer.
This was already covered for commitment transactions and zero fee holder
HTLC transactions, but was missing for holder HTLC transactions on
non-anchors channels.
We can easily do this by reusing the existing
`EcdsaChannelSigner::sign_holder_htlc_transaction` method and
circumventing the existing `holder_htlc_sigs/prev_holder_htlc_sigs`
caches, which will be removed in a later commit anyway.
Since we want our holder HTLC signatures to be randomly generated and
not reused, our existing caches are useless now, so we opt to remove
them.
`sign_holder_commitment_and_htlcs` never really made sense. Unlike
`sign_counterparty_commitment`, the signatures for holder HTLC
transactions may be required much later than the commitment
transaction's. While it was nice for us to only reach the signer once to
obtain all holder signatures, it's not really ideal anymore as we want
our signatures to be random and not reused.
We no longer return all holder HTLC signatures and instead defer to
obtaining them via `EcdsaChannelSigner::sign_holder_htlc_transaction`.
Now that `HTLCDescriptor` is no longer specific to anchors, it doesn't
make sense for it to live in the `bump_transaction` module anymore.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit a1a2f2a into lightningdevkit:mainOct 20, 2023
@wpaulino
wpaulino deleted the random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors branch October 20, 2023 23:25
PXplod pushed a commit to bitlightlabs/rust-lightning that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2024
0.0.118 - Oct 23, 2023 - "Just the Twelve Sinks"
API Updates
===========
* BOLT12 sending and receiving is now supported as an alpha feature. You may
run into unexpected issues and will need to have a direct connection with
the offer's blinded path introduction points as messages are not yet routed.
We are seeking feedback from early testers (lightningdevkit#2578, lightningdevkit#2039).
* `ConfirmationTarget` has been rewritten to provide information about the
specific use LDK needs the feerate estimate for, rather than the generic
low-, medium-, and high-priority estimates. This allows LDK users to more
accurately target their feerate estimates (lightningdevkit#2660). For those wishing to
retain their existing behavior, see the table below for conversion.
* `ChainHash` is now used in place of `BlockHash` where it represents the
genesis block (lightningdevkit#2662).
* `lightning-invoice` payment utilities now take a `Deref` to
`AChannelManager` (lightningdevkit#2652).
* `peel_onion` is provided to statelessly decode an `OnionMessage` (lightningdevkit#2599).
* `ToSocketAddrs` + `Display` are now impl'd for `SocketAddress` (lightningdevkit#2636, lightningdevkit#2670)
* `Display` is now implemented for `OutPoint` (lightningdevkit#2649).
* `Features::from_be_bytes` is now provided (lightningdevkit#2640).
For those moving to the new `ConfirmationTarget`, the new variants in terms of
the old mempool/low/medium/high priorities are as follows:
* `OnChainSweep` = `HighPriority`
* `MaxAllowedNonAnchorChannelRemoteFee` = `max(25 * 250, HighPriority * 10)`
* `MinAllowedAnchorChannelRemoteFee` = `MempoolMinimum`
* `MinAllowedNonAnchorChannelRemoteFee` = `Background - 250`
* `AnchorChannelFee` = `Background`
* `NonAnchorChannelFee` = `Normal`
* `ChannelCloseMinimum` = `Background`
Bug Fixes
=========
* Calling `ChannelManager::close_channel[_with_feerate_and_script]` on a
channel which did not exist would immediately hang holding several key
`ChannelManager`-internal locks (lightningdevkit#2657).
* Channel information updates received from a failing HTLC are no longer
applied to our `NetworkGraph`. This prevents a node which we attempted to
route a payment through from being able to learn the sender of the payment.
In some rare cases, this may result in marginally reduced payment success
rates (lightningdevkit#2666).
* Anchor outputs are now properly considered when calculating the amount
available to send in HTLCs. This can prevent force-closes in anchor channels
when sending payments which overflow the available balance (lightningdevkit#2674).
* A peer that sends an `update_fulfill_htlc` message for a forwarded HTLC,
then reconnects prior to sending a `commitment_signed` (thus retransmitting
their `update_fulfill_htlc`) may result in the channel stalling and being
unable to make progress (lightningdevkit#2661).
* In exceedingly rare circumstances, messages intended to be sent to a peer
prior to reconnection can be sent after reconnection. This could result in
undefined channel state and force-closes (lightningdevkit#2663).
Backwards Compatibility
=======================
* Creating a blinded path to receive a payment then downgrading to LDK prior to
0.0.117 may result in failure to receive the payment (lightningdevkit#2413).
* Calling `ChannelManager::pay_for_offer` or
`ChannelManager::create_refund_builder` may prevent downgrading to LDK prior
to 0.0.118 until the payment times out and has been removed (lightningdevkit#2039).
Node Compatibility
==================
* LDK now sends a bogus `channel_reestablish` message to peers when they ask to
resume an unknown channel. This should cause LND nodes to force-close and
broadcast the latest channel state to the chain. In order to trigger this
when we wish to force-close a channel, LDK now disconnects immediately after
sending a channel-closing `error` message. This should result in cooperative
peers also working to confirm the latest commitment transaction when we wish
to force-close (lightningdevkit#2658).
Security
========
0.0.118 expands mitigations against transaction cycling attacks to non-anchor
channels, though note that no mitigations which exist today are considered robust
to prevent the class of attacks.
* In order to mitigate against transaction cycling attacks, non-anchor HTLC
transactions are now properly re-signed before broadcasting (lightningdevkit#2667).
In total, this release features 61 files changed, 3470 insertions, 1503
deletions in 85 commits from 12 authors, in alphabetical order:
* Antonio Yang
* Elias Rohrer
* Evan Feenstra
* Fedeparma74
* Gursharan Singh
* Jeffrey Czyz
* Matt Corallo
* Sergi Delgado Segura
* Vladimir Fomene
* Wilmer Paulino
* benthecarman
* slanesuke
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@wpaulino@codecov-commenter@jkczyz@ariard@TheBlueMatt@arik-so
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' Use sign_holder_htlc_transaction to sign non-anchors holder HTLCs by wpaulino · Pull Request #2667 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

Use sign_holder_htlc_transaction to sign non-anchors holder HTLCs - #2667

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 6 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors
Oct 20, 2023
Merged

Use sign_holder_htlc_transaction to sign non-anchors holder HTLCs#2667
TheBlueMatt merged 6 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors

Conversation

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We want to ensure we use fresh random signatures to prevent certain classes of transaction replacement attacks at the bitcoin P2P layer. This was already covered for commitment transactions and zero fee holder HTLC transactions, but was missing for holder HTLC transactions on non-anchors channels due to a signature cache. This PR removed said cache completely and switches to signing holder HTLCs with the existing sign_holder_htlc_transaction signing method, previously only used for anchor channels.

Comment threadlightning/src/events/bump_transaction.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs
@wpaulinowpaulino added this to the 0.0.118 milestone Oct 17, 2023

@ariardariard left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Re-broadcasting at every block still means every competing replacement must at least commit feerate in mempool

Comment threadlightning/src/sign/mod.rs Outdated
We plan to use `EcdsaChannelSigner::sign_holder_htlc_transaction` to
also sign holder HTLC transactions on non-anchor outputs channels.
`HTLCDescriptor` was only used in an anchor outputs context, so a few
things needed changing, mostly to handle the different scripts and
feerate.
`OnchainTxHandler` will need to construct `HTLCDescriptor`s for holder
HTLCs, but it did not have access to all of the derivation parameters
that need to be provided.
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors branch from 4f1d1f8 to dc1c232CompareOctober 20, 2023 18:06
@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Oct 20, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: 27 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (b1d3aa8) 89.06% compared to head (a5fd95d) 88.72%.
Report is 62 commits behind head on main.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #2667 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 89.06% 88.72% -0.34% 
==========================================
Files 112 112 Lines 87417 88365 +948 Branches 87417 88365 +948 ==========================================
+ Hits 77856 78405 +549 - Misses 7322 7718 +396 - Partials 2239 2242 +3 
FilesCoverage Δ
lightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs84.91% <100.00%> (+0.01%)⬆️
lightning/src/events/bump_transaction.rs82.86% <ø> (+0.52%)⬆️
lightning/src/ln/chan_utils.rs91.02% <100.00%> (-1.19%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/channel.rs88.38% <ø> (+0.01%)⬆️
lightning/src/util/test_channel_signer.rs85.18% <92.30%> (-0.90%)⬇️
lightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs80.13% <92.30%> (-1.72%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs98.01% <95.69%> (-0.54%)⬇️
lightning/src/sign/mod.rs74.86% <80.68%> (+0.07%)⬆️

... and 36 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt previously approved these changes Oct 20, 2023
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/chan_utils.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/chan_utils.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/chan_utils.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/sign/mod.rs
@jkczyz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Looks good after a couple minor comments. Much more mechanical than I first thought.

@ariard

Copy link
Copy Markdown

won’t have time to review further, though test coverage sounds good from previous look.

@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors branch 2 times, most recently from c171169 to 225a860CompareOctober 20, 2023 21:55
Comment threadlightning/src/sign/mod.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/sign/mod.rs
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors branch from 225a860 to a5fd95dCompareOctober 20, 2023 22:09
jkczyz
jkczyz previously approved these changes Oct 20, 2023
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs Outdated
We want to ensure we use fresh random signatures to prevent certain
classes of transaction replacement attacks at the bitcoin P2P layer.
This was already covered for commitment transactions and zero fee holder
HTLC transactions, but was missing for holder HTLC transactions on
non-anchors channels.
We can easily do this by reusing the existing
`EcdsaChannelSigner::sign_holder_htlc_transaction` method and
circumventing the existing `holder_htlc_sigs/prev_holder_htlc_sigs`
caches, which will be removed in a later commit anyway.
Since we want our holder HTLC signatures to be randomly generated and
not reused, our existing caches are useless now, so we opt to remove
them.
`sign_holder_commitment_and_htlcs` never really made sense. Unlike
`sign_counterparty_commitment`, the signatures for holder HTLC
transactions may be required much later than the commitment
transaction's. While it was nice for us to only reach the signer once to
obtain all holder signatures, it's not really ideal anymore as we want
our signatures to be random and not reused.
We no longer return all holder HTLC signatures and instead defer to
obtaining them via `EcdsaChannelSigner::sign_holder_htlc_transaction`.
Now that `HTLCDescriptor` is no longer specific to anchors, it doesn't
make sense for it to live in the `bump_transaction` module anymore.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit a1a2f2a into lightningdevkit:mainOct 20, 2023
@wpaulino
wpaulino deleted the random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors branch October 20, 2023 23:25
PXplod pushed a commit to bitlightlabs/rust-lightning that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2024
0.0.118 - Oct 23, 2023 - "Just the Twelve Sinks"
API Updates
===========
* BOLT12 sending and receiving is now supported as an alpha feature. You may
run into unexpected issues and will need to have a direct connection with
the offer's blinded path introduction points as messages are not yet routed.
We are seeking feedback from early testers (lightningdevkit#2578, lightningdevkit#2039).
* `ConfirmationTarget` has been rewritten to provide information about the
specific use LDK needs the feerate estimate for, rather than the generic
low-, medium-, and high-priority estimates. This allows LDK users to more
accurately target their feerate estimates (lightningdevkit#2660). For those wishing to
retain their existing behavior, see the table below for conversion.
* `ChainHash` is now used in place of `BlockHash` where it represents the
genesis block (lightningdevkit#2662).
* `lightning-invoice` payment utilities now take a `Deref` to
`AChannelManager` (lightningdevkit#2652).
* `peel_onion` is provided to statelessly decode an `OnionMessage` (lightningdevkit#2599).
* `ToSocketAddrs` + `Display` are now impl'd for `SocketAddress` (lightningdevkit#2636, lightningdevkit#2670)
* `Display` is now implemented for `OutPoint` (lightningdevkit#2649).
* `Features::from_be_bytes` is now provided (lightningdevkit#2640).
For those moving to the new `ConfirmationTarget`, the new variants in terms of
the old mempool/low/medium/high priorities are as follows:
* `OnChainSweep` = `HighPriority`
* `MaxAllowedNonAnchorChannelRemoteFee` = `max(25 * 250, HighPriority * 10)`
* `MinAllowedAnchorChannelRemoteFee` = `MempoolMinimum`
* `MinAllowedNonAnchorChannelRemoteFee` = `Background - 250`
* `AnchorChannelFee` = `Background`
* `NonAnchorChannelFee` = `Normal`
* `ChannelCloseMinimum` = `Background`
Bug Fixes
=========
* Calling `ChannelManager::close_channel[_with_feerate_and_script]` on a
channel which did not exist would immediately hang holding several key
`ChannelManager`-internal locks (lightningdevkit#2657).
* Channel information updates received from a failing HTLC are no longer
applied to our `NetworkGraph`. This prevents a node which we attempted to
route a payment through from being able to learn the sender of the payment.
In some rare cases, this may result in marginally reduced payment success
rates (lightningdevkit#2666).
* Anchor outputs are now properly considered when calculating the amount
available to send in HTLCs. This can prevent force-closes in anchor channels
when sending payments which overflow the available balance (lightningdevkit#2674).
* A peer that sends an `update_fulfill_htlc` message for a forwarded HTLC,
then reconnects prior to sending a `commitment_signed` (thus retransmitting
their `update_fulfill_htlc`) may result in the channel stalling and being
unable to make progress (lightningdevkit#2661).
* In exceedingly rare circumstances, messages intended to be sent to a peer
prior to reconnection can be sent after reconnection. This could result in
undefined channel state and force-closes (lightningdevkit#2663).
Backwards Compatibility
=======================
* Creating a blinded path to receive a payment then downgrading to LDK prior to
0.0.117 may result in failure to receive the payment (lightningdevkit#2413).
* Calling `ChannelManager::pay_for_offer` or
`ChannelManager::create_refund_builder` may prevent downgrading to LDK prior
to 0.0.118 until the payment times out and has been removed (lightningdevkit#2039).
Node Compatibility
==================
* LDK now sends a bogus `channel_reestablish` message to peers when they ask to
resume an unknown channel. This should cause LND nodes to force-close and
broadcast the latest channel state to the chain. In order to trigger this
when we wish to force-close a channel, LDK now disconnects immediately after
sending a channel-closing `error` message. This should result in cooperative
peers also working to confirm the latest commitment transaction when we wish
to force-close (lightningdevkit#2658).
Security
========
0.0.118 expands mitigations against transaction cycling attacks to non-anchor
channels, though note that no mitigations which exist today are considered robust
to prevent the class of attacks.
* In order to mitigate against transaction cycling attacks, non-anchor HTLC
transactions are now properly re-signed before broadcasting (lightningdevkit#2667).
In total, this release features 61 files changed, 3470 insertions, 1503
deletions in 85 commits from 12 authors, in alphabetical order:
* Antonio Yang
* Elias Rohrer
* Evan Feenstra
* Fedeparma74
* Gursharan Singh
* Jeffrey Czyz
* Matt Corallo
* Sergi Delgado Segura
* Vladimir Fomene
* Wilmer Paulino
* benthecarman
* slanesuke
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@wpaulino@codecov-commenter@jkczyz@ariard@TheBlueMatt@arik-so
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Use sign_holder_htlc_transaction to sign non-anchors holder HTLCs by wpaulino · Pull Request #2667 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

Use sign_holder_htlc_transaction to sign non-anchors holder HTLCs - #2667

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 6 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors
Oct 20, 2023
Merged

Use sign_holder_htlc_transaction to sign non-anchors holder HTLCs#2667
TheBlueMatt merged 6 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors

Conversation

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We want to ensure we use fresh random signatures to prevent certain classes of transaction replacement attacks at the bitcoin P2P layer. This was already covered for commitment transactions and zero fee holder HTLC transactions, but was missing for holder HTLC transactions on non-anchors channels due to a signature cache. This PR removed said cache completely and switches to signing holder HTLCs with the existing sign_holder_htlc_transaction signing method, previously only used for anchor channels.

Comment threadlightning/src/events/bump_transaction.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs
@wpaulinowpaulino added this to the 0.0.118 milestone Oct 17, 2023

@ariardariard left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Re-broadcasting at every block still means every competing replacement must at least commit feerate in mempool

Comment threadlightning/src/sign/mod.rs Outdated
We plan to use `EcdsaChannelSigner::sign_holder_htlc_transaction` to
also sign holder HTLC transactions on non-anchor outputs channels.
`HTLCDescriptor` was only used in an anchor outputs context, so a few
things needed changing, mostly to handle the different scripts and
feerate.
`OnchainTxHandler` will need to construct `HTLCDescriptor`s for holder
HTLCs, but it did not have access to all of the derivation parameters
that need to be provided.
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors branch from 4f1d1f8 to dc1c232CompareOctober 20, 2023 18:06
@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Oct 20, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: 27 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (b1d3aa8) 89.06% compared to head (a5fd95d) 88.72%.
Report is 62 commits behind head on main.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #2667 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 89.06% 88.72% -0.34% 
==========================================
Files 112 112 Lines 87417 88365 +948 Branches 87417 88365 +948 ==========================================
+ Hits 77856 78405 +549 - Misses 7322 7718 +396 - Partials 2239 2242 +3 
FilesCoverage Δ
lightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs84.91% <100.00%> (+0.01%)⬆️
lightning/src/events/bump_transaction.rs82.86% <ø> (+0.52%)⬆️
lightning/src/ln/chan_utils.rs91.02% <100.00%> (-1.19%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/channel.rs88.38% <ø> (+0.01%)⬆️
lightning/src/util/test_channel_signer.rs85.18% <92.30%> (-0.90%)⬇️
lightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs80.13% <92.30%> (-1.72%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs98.01% <95.69%> (-0.54%)⬇️
lightning/src/sign/mod.rs74.86% <80.68%> (+0.07%)⬆️

... and 36 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt previously approved these changes Oct 20, 2023
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/chan_utils.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/chan_utils.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/chan_utils.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/sign/mod.rs
@jkczyz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Looks good after a couple minor comments. Much more mechanical than I first thought.

@ariard

Copy link
Copy Markdown

won’t have time to review further, though test coverage sounds good from previous look.

@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors branch 2 times, most recently from c171169 to 225a860CompareOctober 20, 2023 21:55
Comment threadlightning/src/sign/mod.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/sign/mod.rs
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors branch from 225a860 to a5fd95dCompareOctober 20, 2023 22:09
jkczyz
jkczyz previously approved these changes Oct 20, 2023
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs Outdated
We want to ensure we use fresh random signatures to prevent certain
classes of transaction replacement attacks at the bitcoin P2P layer.
This was already covered for commitment transactions and zero fee holder
HTLC transactions, but was missing for holder HTLC transactions on
non-anchors channels.
We can easily do this by reusing the existing
`EcdsaChannelSigner::sign_holder_htlc_transaction` method and
circumventing the existing `holder_htlc_sigs/prev_holder_htlc_sigs`
caches, which will be removed in a later commit anyway.
Since we want our holder HTLC signatures to be randomly generated and
not reused, our existing caches are useless now, so we opt to remove
them.
`sign_holder_commitment_and_htlcs` never really made sense. Unlike
`sign_counterparty_commitment`, the signatures for holder HTLC
transactions may be required much later than the commitment
transaction's. While it was nice for us to only reach the signer once to
obtain all holder signatures, it's not really ideal anymore as we want
our signatures to be random and not reused.
We no longer return all holder HTLC signatures and instead defer to
obtaining them via `EcdsaChannelSigner::sign_holder_htlc_transaction`.
Now that `HTLCDescriptor` is no longer specific to anchors, it doesn't
make sense for it to live in the `bump_transaction` module anymore.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit a1a2f2a into lightningdevkit:mainOct 20, 2023
@wpaulino
wpaulino deleted the random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors branch October 20, 2023 23:25
PXplod pushed a commit to bitlightlabs/rust-lightning that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2024
0.0.118 - Oct 23, 2023 - "Just the Twelve Sinks"
API Updates
===========
* BOLT12 sending and receiving is now supported as an alpha feature. You may
run into unexpected issues and will need to have a direct connection with
the offer's blinded path introduction points as messages are not yet routed.
We are seeking feedback from early testers (lightningdevkit#2578, lightningdevkit#2039).
* `ConfirmationTarget` has been rewritten to provide information about the
specific use LDK needs the feerate estimate for, rather than the generic
low-, medium-, and high-priority estimates. This allows LDK users to more
accurately target their feerate estimates (lightningdevkit#2660). For those wishing to
retain their existing behavior, see the table below for conversion.
* `ChainHash` is now used in place of `BlockHash` where it represents the
genesis block (lightningdevkit#2662).
* `lightning-invoice` payment utilities now take a `Deref` to
`AChannelManager` (lightningdevkit#2652).
* `peel_onion` is provided to statelessly decode an `OnionMessage` (lightningdevkit#2599).
* `ToSocketAddrs` + `Display` are now impl'd for `SocketAddress` (lightningdevkit#2636, lightningdevkit#2670)
* `Display` is now implemented for `OutPoint` (lightningdevkit#2649).
* `Features::from_be_bytes` is now provided (lightningdevkit#2640).
For those moving to the new `ConfirmationTarget`, the new variants in terms of
the old mempool/low/medium/high priorities are as follows:
* `OnChainSweep` = `HighPriority`
* `MaxAllowedNonAnchorChannelRemoteFee` = `max(25 * 250, HighPriority * 10)`
* `MinAllowedAnchorChannelRemoteFee` = `MempoolMinimum`
* `MinAllowedNonAnchorChannelRemoteFee` = `Background - 250`
* `AnchorChannelFee` = `Background`
* `NonAnchorChannelFee` = `Normal`
* `ChannelCloseMinimum` = `Background`
Bug Fixes
=========
* Calling `ChannelManager::close_channel[_with_feerate_and_script]` on a
channel which did not exist would immediately hang holding several key
`ChannelManager`-internal locks (lightningdevkit#2657).
* Channel information updates received from a failing HTLC are no longer
applied to our `NetworkGraph`. This prevents a node which we attempted to
route a payment through from being able to learn the sender of the payment.
In some rare cases, this may result in marginally reduced payment success
rates (lightningdevkit#2666).
* Anchor outputs are now properly considered when calculating the amount
available to send in HTLCs. This can prevent force-closes in anchor channels
when sending payments which overflow the available balance (lightningdevkit#2674).
* A peer that sends an `update_fulfill_htlc` message for a forwarded HTLC,
then reconnects prior to sending a `commitment_signed` (thus retransmitting
their `update_fulfill_htlc`) may result in the channel stalling and being
unable to make progress (lightningdevkit#2661).
* In exceedingly rare circumstances, messages intended to be sent to a peer
prior to reconnection can be sent after reconnection. This could result in
undefined channel state and force-closes (lightningdevkit#2663).
Backwards Compatibility
=======================
* Creating a blinded path to receive a payment then downgrading to LDK prior to
0.0.117 may result in failure to receive the payment (lightningdevkit#2413).
* Calling `ChannelManager::pay_for_offer` or
`ChannelManager::create_refund_builder` may prevent downgrading to LDK prior
to 0.0.118 until the payment times out and has been removed (lightningdevkit#2039).
Node Compatibility
==================
* LDK now sends a bogus `channel_reestablish` message to peers when they ask to
resume an unknown channel. This should cause LND nodes to force-close and
broadcast the latest channel state to the chain. In order to trigger this
when we wish to force-close a channel, LDK now disconnects immediately after
sending a channel-closing `error` message. This should result in cooperative
peers also working to confirm the latest commitment transaction when we wish
to force-close (lightningdevkit#2658).
Security
========
0.0.118 expands mitigations against transaction cycling attacks to non-anchor
channels, though note that no mitigations which exist today are considered robust
to prevent the class of attacks.
* In order to mitigate against transaction cycling attacks, non-anchor HTLC
transactions are now properly re-signed before broadcasting (lightningdevkit#2667).
In total, this release features 61 files changed, 3470 insertions, 1503
deletions in 85 commits from 12 authors, in alphabetical order:
* Antonio Yang
* Elias Rohrer
* Evan Feenstra
* Fedeparma74
* Gursharan Singh
* Jeffrey Czyz
* Matt Corallo
* Sergi Delgado Segura
* Vladimir Fomene
* Wilmer Paulino
* benthecarman
* slanesuke
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@wpaulino@codecov-commenter@jkczyz@ariard@TheBlueMatt@arik-so
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Use sign_holder_htlc_transaction to sign non-anchors holder HTLCs by wpaulino · Pull Request #2667 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

Use sign_holder_htlc_transaction to sign non-anchors holder HTLCs - #2667

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 6 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors
Oct 20, 2023
Merged

Use sign_holder_htlc_transaction to sign non-anchors holder HTLCs#2667
TheBlueMatt merged 6 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors

Conversation

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We want to ensure we use fresh random signatures to prevent certain classes of transaction replacement attacks at the bitcoin P2P layer. This was already covered for commitment transactions and zero fee holder HTLC transactions, but was missing for holder HTLC transactions on non-anchors channels due to a signature cache. This PR removed said cache completely and switches to signing holder HTLCs with the existing sign_holder_htlc_transaction signing method, previously only used for anchor channels.

Comment threadlightning/src/events/bump_transaction.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs
@wpaulinowpaulino added this to the 0.0.118 milestone Oct 17, 2023

@ariardariard left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Re-broadcasting at every block still means every competing replacement must at least commit feerate in mempool

Comment threadlightning/src/sign/mod.rs Outdated
We plan to use `EcdsaChannelSigner::sign_holder_htlc_transaction` to
also sign holder HTLC transactions on non-anchor outputs channels.
`HTLCDescriptor` was only used in an anchor outputs context, so a few
things needed changing, mostly to handle the different scripts and
feerate.
`OnchainTxHandler` will need to construct `HTLCDescriptor`s for holder
HTLCs, but it did not have access to all of the derivation parameters
that need to be provided.
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors branch from 4f1d1f8 to dc1c232CompareOctober 20, 2023 18:06
@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Oct 20, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: 27 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (b1d3aa8) 89.06% compared to head (a5fd95d) 88.72%.
Report is 62 commits behind head on main.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #2667 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 89.06% 88.72% -0.34% 
==========================================
Files 112 112 Lines 87417 88365 +948 Branches 87417 88365 +948 ==========================================
+ Hits 77856 78405 +549 - Misses 7322 7718 +396 - Partials 2239 2242 +3 
FilesCoverage Δ
lightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs84.91% <100.00%> (+0.01%)⬆️
lightning/src/events/bump_transaction.rs82.86% <ø> (+0.52%)⬆️
lightning/src/ln/chan_utils.rs91.02% <100.00%> (-1.19%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/channel.rs88.38% <ø> (+0.01%)⬆️
lightning/src/util/test_channel_signer.rs85.18% <92.30%> (-0.90%)⬇️
lightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs80.13% <92.30%> (-1.72%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs98.01% <95.69%> (-0.54%)⬇️
lightning/src/sign/mod.rs74.86% <80.68%> (+0.07%)⬆️

... and 36 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt previously approved these changes Oct 20, 2023
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/chan_utils.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/chan_utils.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/chan_utils.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/sign/mod.rs
@jkczyz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Looks good after a couple minor comments. Much more mechanical than I first thought.

@ariard

Copy link
Copy Markdown

won’t have time to review further, though test coverage sounds good from previous look.

@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors branch 2 times, most recently from c171169 to 225a860CompareOctober 20, 2023 21:55
Comment threadlightning/src/sign/mod.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/sign/mod.rs
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors branch from 225a860 to a5fd95dCompareOctober 20, 2023 22:09
jkczyz
jkczyz previously approved these changes Oct 20, 2023
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs Outdated
We want to ensure we use fresh random signatures to prevent certain
classes of transaction replacement attacks at the bitcoin P2P layer.
This was already covered for commitment transactions and zero fee holder
HTLC transactions, but was missing for holder HTLC transactions on
non-anchors channels.
We can easily do this by reusing the existing
`EcdsaChannelSigner::sign_holder_htlc_transaction` method and
circumventing the existing `holder_htlc_sigs/prev_holder_htlc_sigs`
caches, which will be removed in a later commit anyway.
Since we want our holder HTLC signatures to be randomly generated and
not reused, our existing caches are useless now, so we opt to remove
them.
`sign_holder_commitment_and_htlcs` never really made sense. Unlike
`sign_counterparty_commitment`, the signatures for holder HTLC
transactions may be required much later than the commitment
transaction's. While it was nice for us to only reach the signer once to
obtain all holder signatures, it's not really ideal anymore as we want
our signatures to be random and not reused.
We no longer return all holder HTLC signatures and instead defer to
obtaining them via `EcdsaChannelSigner::sign_holder_htlc_transaction`.
Now that `HTLCDescriptor` is no longer specific to anchors, it doesn't
make sense for it to live in the `bump_transaction` module anymore.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit a1a2f2a into lightningdevkit:mainOct 20, 2023
@wpaulino
wpaulino deleted the random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors branch October 20, 2023 23:25
PXplod pushed a commit to bitlightlabs/rust-lightning that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2024
0.0.118 - Oct 23, 2023 - "Just the Twelve Sinks"
API Updates
===========
* BOLT12 sending and receiving is now supported as an alpha feature. You may
run into unexpected issues and will need to have a direct connection with
the offer's blinded path introduction points as messages are not yet routed.
We are seeking feedback from early testers (lightningdevkit#2578, lightningdevkit#2039).
* `ConfirmationTarget` has been rewritten to provide information about the
specific use LDK needs the feerate estimate for, rather than the generic
low-, medium-, and high-priority estimates. This allows LDK users to more
accurately target their feerate estimates (lightningdevkit#2660). For those wishing to
retain their existing behavior, see the table below for conversion.
* `ChainHash` is now used in place of `BlockHash` where it represents the
genesis block (lightningdevkit#2662).
* `lightning-invoice` payment utilities now take a `Deref` to
`AChannelManager` (lightningdevkit#2652).
* `peel_onion` is provided to statelessly decode an `OnionMessage` (lightningdevkit#2599).
* `ToSocketAddrs` + `Display` are now impl'd for `SocketAddress` (lightningdevkit#2636, lightningdevkit#2670)
* `Display` is now implemented for `OutPoint` (lightningdevkit#2649).
* `Features::from_be_bytes` is now provided (lightningdevkit#2640).
For those moving to the new `ConfirmationTarget`, the new variants in terms of
the old mempool/low/medium/high priorities are as follows:
* `OnChainSweep` = `HighPriority`
* `MaxAllowedNonAnchorChannelRemoteFee` = `max(25 * 250, HighPriority * 10)`
* `MinAllowedAnchorChannelRemoteFee` = `MempoolMinimum`
* `MinAllowedNonAnchorChannelRemoteFee` = `Background - 250`
* `AnchorChannelFee` = `Background`
* `NonAnchorChannelFee` = `Normal`
* `ChannelCloseMinimum` = `Background`
Bug Fixes
=========
* Calling `ChannelManager::close_channel[_with_feerate_and_script]` on a
channel which did not exist would immediately hang holding several key
`ChannelManager`-internal locks (lightningdevkit#2657).
* Channel information updates received from a failing HTLC are no longer
applied to our `NetworkGraph`. This prevents a node which we attempted to
route a payment through from being able to learn the sender of the payment.
In some rare cases, this may result in marginally reduced payment success
rates (lightningdevkit#2666).
* Anchor outputs are now properly considered when calculating the amount
available to send in HTLCs. This can prevent force-closes in anchor channels
when sending payments which overflow the available balance (lightningdevkit#2674).
* A peer that sends an `update_fulfill_htlc` message for a forwarded HTLC,
then reconnects prior to sending a `commitment_signed` (thus retransmitting
their `update_fulfill_htlc`) may result in the channel stalling and being
unable to make progress (lightningdevkit#2661).
* In exceedingly rare circumstances, messages intended to be sent to a peer
prior to reconnection can be sent after reconnection. This could result in
undefined channel state and force-closes (lightningdevkit#2663).
Backwards Compatibility
=======================
* Creating a blinded path to receive a payment then downgrading to LDK prior to
0.0.117 may result in failure to receive the payment (lightningdevkit#2413).
* Calling `ChannelManager::pay_for_offer` or
`ChannelManager::create_refund_builder` may prevent downgrading to LDK prior
to 0.0.118 until the payment times out and has been removed (lightningdevkit#2039).
Node Compatibility
==================
* LDK now sends a bogus `channel_reestablish` message to peers when they ask to
resume an unknown channel. This should cause LND nodes to force-close and
broadcast the latest channel state to the chain. In order to trigger this
when we wish to force-close a channel, LDK now disconnects immediately after
sending a channel-closing `error` message. This should result in cooperative
peers also working to confirm the latest commitment transaction when we wish
to force-close (lightningdevkit#2658).
Security
========
0.0.118 expands mitigations against transaction cycling attacks to non-anchor
channels, though note that no mitigations which exist today are considered robust
to prevent the class of attacks.
* In order to mitigate against transaction cycling attacks, non-anchor HTLC
transactions are now properly re-signed before broadcasting (lightningdevkit#2667).
In total, this release features 61 files changed, 3470 insertions, 1503
deletions in 85 commits from 12 authors, in alphabetical order:
* Antonio Yang
* Elias Rohrer
* Evan Feenstra
* Fedeparma74
* Gursharan Singh
* Jeffrey Czyz
* Matt Corallo
* Sergi Delgado Segura
* Vladimir Fomene
* Wilmer Paulino
* benthecarman
* slanesuke
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@wpaulino@codecov-commenter@jkczyz@ariard@TheBlueMatt@arik-so
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); Use sign_holder_htlc_transaction to sign non-anchors holder HTLCs by wpaulino · Pull Request #2667 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

Use sign_holder_htlc_transaction to sign non-anchors holder HTLCs - #2667

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 6 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors
Oct 20, 2023
Merged

Use sign_holder_htlc_transaction to sign non-anchors holder HTLCs#2667
TheBlueMatt merged 6 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors

Conversation

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We want to ensure we use fresh random signatures to prevent certain classes of transaction replacement attacks at the bitcoin P2P layer. This was already covered for commitment transactions and zero fee holder HTLC transactions, but was missing for holder HTLC transactions on non-anchors channels due to a signature cache. This PR removed said cache completely and switches to signing holder HTLCs with the existing sign_holder_htlc_transaction signing method, previously only used for anchor channels.

Comment threadlightning/src/events/bump_transaction.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs
@wpaulinowpaulino added this to the 0.0.118 milestone Oct 17, 2023

@ariardariard left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Re-broadcasting at every block still means every competing replacement must at least commit feerate in mempool

Comment threadlightning/src/sign/mod.rs Outdated
We plan to use `EcdsaChannelSigner::sign_holder_htlc_transaction` to
also sign holder HTLC transactions on non-anchor outputs channels.
`HTLCDescriptor` was only used in an anchor outputs context, so a few
things needed changing, mostly to handle the different scripts and
feerate.
`OnchainTxHandler` will need to construct `HTLCDescriptor`s for holder
HTLCs, but it did not have access to all of the derivation parameters
that need to be provided.
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors branch from 4f1d1f8 to dc1c232CompareOctober 20, 2023 18:06
@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Oct 20, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: 27 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (b1d3aa8) 89.06% compared to head (a5fd95d) 88.72%.
Report is 62 commits behind head on main.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #2667 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 89.06% 88.72% -0.34% 
==========================================
Files 112 112 Lines 87417 88365 +948 Branches 87417 88365 +948 ==========================================
+ Hits 77856 78405 +549 - Misses 7322 7718 +396 - Partials 2239 2242 +3 
FilesCoverage Δ
lightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs84.91% <100.00%> (+0.01%)⬆️
lightning/src/events/bump_transaction.rs82.86% <ø> (+0.52%)⬆️
lightning/src/ln/chan_utils.rs91.02% <100.00%> (-1.19%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/channel.rs88.38% <ø> (+0.01%)⬆️
lightning/src/util/test_channel_signer.rs85.18% <92.30%> (-0.90%)⬇️
lightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs80.13% <92.30%> (-1.72%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs98.01% <95.69%> (-0.54%)⬇️
lightning/src/sign/mod.rs74.86% <80.68%> (+0.07%)⬆️

... and 36 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt previously approved these changes Oct 20, 2023
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/chan_utils.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/chan_utils.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/chan_utils.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/sign/mod.rs
@jkczyz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Looks good after a couple minor comments. Much more mechanical than I first thought.

@ariard

Copy link
Copy Markdown

won’t have time to review further, though test coverage sounds good from previous look.

@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors branch 2 times, most recently from c171169 to 225a860CompareOctober 20, 2023 21:55
Comment threadlightning/src/sign/mod.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/sign/mod.rs
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors branch from 225a860 to a5fd95dCompareOctober 20, 2023 22:09
jkczyz
jkczyz previously approved these changes Oct 20, 2023
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs Outdated
We want to ensure we use fresh random signatures to prevent certain
classes of transaction replacement attacks at the bitcoin P2P layer.
This was already covered for commitment transactions and zero fee holder
HTLC transactions, but was missing for holder HTLC transactions on
non-anchors channels.
We can easily do this by reusing the existing
`EcdsaChannelSigner::sign_holder_htlc_transaction` method and
circumventing the existing `holder_htlc_sigs/prev_holder_htlc_sigs`
caches, which will be removed in a later commit anyway.
Since we want our holder HTLC signatures to be randomly generated and
not reused, our existing caches are useless now, so we opt to remove
them.
`sign_holder_commitment_and_htlcs` never really made sense. Unlike
`sign_counterparty_commitment`, the signatures for holder HTLC
transactions may be required much later than the commitment
transaction's. While it was nice for us to only reach the signer once to
obtain all holder signatures, it's not really ideal anymore as we want
our signatures to be random and not reused.
We no longer return all holder HTLC signatures and instead defer to
obtaining them via `EcdsaChannelSigner::sign_holder_htlc_transaction`.
Now that `HTLCDescriptor` is no longer specific to anchors, it doesn't
make sense for it to live in the `bump_transaction` module anymore.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit a1a2f2a into lightningdevkit:mainOct 20, 2023
@wpaulino
wpaulino deleted the random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors branch October 20, 2023 23:25
PXplod pushed a commit to bitlightlabs/rust-lightning that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2024
0.0.118 - Oct 23, 2023 - "Just the Twelve Sinks"
API Updates
===========
* BOLT12 sending and receiving is now supported as an alpha feature. You may
run into unexpected issues and will need to have a direct connection with
the offer's blinded path introduction points as messages are not yet routed.
We are seeking feedback from early testers (lightningdevkit#2578, lightningdevkit#2039).
* `ConfirmationTarget` has been rewritten to provide information about the
specific use LDK needs the feerate estimate for, rather than the generic
low-, medium-, and high-priority estimates. This allows LDK users to more
accurately target their feerate estimates (lightningdevkit#2660). For those wishing to
retain their existing behavior, see the table below for conversion.
* `ChainHash` is now used in place of `BlockHash` where it represents the
genesis block (lightningdevkit#2662).
* `lightning-invoice` payment utilities now take a `Deref` to
`AChannelManager` (lightningdevkit#2652).
* `peel_onion` is provided to statelessly decode an `OnionMessage` (lightningdevkit#2599).
* `ToSocketAddrs` + `Display` are now impl'd for `SocketAddress` (lightningdevkit#2636, lightningdevkit#2670)
* `Display` is now implemented for `OutPoint` (lightningdevkit#2649).
* `Features::from_be_bytes` is now provided (lightningdevkit#2640).
For those moving to the new `ConfirmationTarget`, the new variants in terms of
the old mempool/low/medium/high priorities are as follows:
* `OnChainSweep` = `HighPriority`
* `MaxAllowedNonAnchorChannelRemoteFee` = `max(25 * 250, HighPriority * 10)`
* `MinAllowedAnchorChannelRemoteFee` = `MempoolMinimum`
* `MinAllowedNonAnchorChannelRemoteFee` = `Background - 250`
* `AnchorChannelFee` = `Background`
* `NonAnchorChannelFee` = `Normal`
* `ChannelCloseMinimum` = `Background`
Bug Fixes
=========
* Calling `ChannelManager::close_channel[_with_feerate_and_script]` on a
channel which did not exist would immediately hang holding several key
`ChannelManager`-internal locks (lightningdevkit#2657).
* Channel information updates received from a failing HTLC are no longer
applied to our `NetworkGraph`. This prevents a node which we attempted to
route a payment through from being able to learn the sender of the payment.
In some rare cases, this may result in marginally reduced payment success
rates (lightningdevkit#2666).
* Anchor outputs are now properly considered when calculating the amount
available to send in HTLCs. This can prevent force-closes in anchor channels
when sending payments which overflow the available balance (lightningdevkit#2674).
* A peer that sends an `update_fulfill_htlc` message for a forwarded HTLC,
then reconnects prior to sending a `commitment_signed` (thus retransmitting
their `update_fulfill_htlc`) may result in the channel stalling and being
unable to make progress (lightningdevkit#2661).
* In exceedingly rare circumstances, messages intended to be sent to a peer
prior to reconnection can be sent after reconnection. This could result in
undefined channel state and force-closes (lightningdevkit#2663).
Backwards Compatibility
=======================
* Creating a blinded path to receive a payment then downgrading to LDK prior to
0.0.117 may result in failure to receive the payment (lightningdevkit#2413).
* Calling `ChannelManager::pay_for_offer` or
`ChannelManager::create_refund_builder` may prevent downgrading to LDK prior
to 0.0.118 until the payment times out and has been removed (lightningdevkit#2039).
Node Compatibility
==================
* LDK now sends a bogus `channel_reestablish` message to peers when they ask to
resume an unknown channel. This should cause LND nodes to force-close and
broadcast the latest channel state to the chain. In order to trigger this
when we wish to force-close a channel, LDK now disconnects immediately after
sending a channel-closing `error` message. This should result in cooperative
peers also working to confirm the latest commitment transaction when we wish
to force-close (lightningdevkit#2658).
Security
========
0.0.118 expands mitigations against transaction cycling attacks to non-anchor
channels, though note that no mitigations which exist today are considered robust
to prevent the class of attacks.
* In order to mitigate against transaction cycling attacks, non-anchor HTLC
transactions are now properly re-signed before broadcasting (lightningdevkit#2667).
In total, this release features 61 files changed, 3470 insertions, 1503
deletions in 85 commits from 12 authors, in alphabetical order:
* Antonio Yang
* Elias Rohrer
* Evan Feenstra
* Fedeparma74
* Gursharan Singh
* Jeffrey Czyz
* Matt Corallo
* Sergi Delgado Segura
* Vladimir Fomene
* Wilmer Paulino
* benthecarman
* slanesuke
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@wpaulino@codecov-commenter@jkczyz@ariard@TheBlueMatt@arik-so