Fix panic when peer is mid-handshake - #2842

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
jkczyz:2024-01-fix-peer-handler-unwrap
Jan 22, 2024
Merged

Fix panic when peer is mid-handshake#2842
TheBlueMatt merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
jkczyz:2024-01-fix-peer-handler-unwrap

Conversation

@jkczyz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Peer::their_node_id is set to Some during the handshake process. However, df3ab2e accesses the field unconditionally, causing a panic. This may be triggered if a gossip message is received mid-handshake from another peer or if the user calls broadcast_node_announcement during this time. The latter tends to be executed on a timer.

Update the fuzz test to call broadcast_node_announcement mid-handshake on an inbound channel in order to trigger a panic. Ensure that Peer::their_node_id is only accessed once the handshake is complete.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Jan 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Walkthrough

The codebase has been updated with a new functionality in the fuzz testing suite and minor refactoring in the peer handler of the lightning module. The fuzz testing now includes a scenario for broadcasting node announcements, enhancing the robustness of the network communication features. Meanwhile, the lightning module has seen a reorganization of code for better readability, along with the addition of log initialization within certain conditions, although the core logic remains untouched.

Changes

File PathChange Summary
fuzz/src/full_stack.rsAdded a new match arm for broadcasting node announcements in do_test function. Comments related to broadcasting node announcements have been added to the test module.
lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rsReordered code and added logger initialization within conditional blocks. The logic and control flow remain largely unchanged.

🐇✨
In the realm of code where the lightning plays,
A rabbit hopped through the algorithmic maze.
With a flip and a broadcast, the nodes announce,
"We're more robust!" the bytes joyfully pronounce. 📢🎉

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6b0ba8c and 3dee0cf.
Files selected for processing (2)
  • fuzz/src/full_stack.rs (3 hunks)
  • lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs
Additional comments: 1
fuzz/src/full_stack.rs (1)
  • 717-719: The addition of the match arm at line 17 to call broadcast_node_announcement during the handshake process is consistent with the PR's objective to replicate the panic scenario for the fuzz test.

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Jan 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: 3 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (5592378) 88.54% compared to head (c7465bd) 88.53%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

FilesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs0.00%3 Missing ⚠️

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #2842 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 88.54% 88.53% -0.01% 
==========================================
Files 115 115 Lines 92277 92277 Branches 92277 92277 ==========================================
- Hits 81706 81702 -4 - Misses 8068 8073 +5 + Partials 2503 2502 -1 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Actually, can you drop the fuzz change commit? I have a larger patch locally that I want to upstream that adds broader coverage.

Peer::their_node_id is set to Some during the handshake process.
However, df3ab2e accesses the field
unconditionally, causing a panic. This may be triggered if a gossip
message is received mid-handshake from another peer or if the user calls
broadcast_node_announcement during this time. The latter tends to be
executed on a timer.
Ensure that Peer::their_node_id is only accessed once the handshake is
complete.
@jkczyz
jkczyzforce-pushed the 2024-01-fix-peer-handler-unwrap branch from 3dee0cf to c7465bdCompareJanuary 22, 2024 21:36
@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt added this to the 0.0.122 milestone Jan 22, 2024

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6b0ba8c and c7465bd.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt modified the milestones: 0.0.122, 0.0.121Jan 22, 2024
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs Outdated
}
debug_assert!(peer.their_node_id.is_some());
debug_assert!(peer.channel_encryptor.is_ready_for_encryption());
let logger = WithContext::from(&self.logger, Some(peer.their_node_id.unwrap().0), None);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we also remove the unwrap while we're here?

Suggested change
let logger = WithContext::from(&self.logger,Some(peer.their_node_id.unwrap().0),None);
let logger = WithContext::from(&self.logger, peer.their_node_id.map(|p| p.0),None);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done here and few other places

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c7465bd and 7b8d018.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs (6 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Super straightforward patch, only real change is fewer unwraps. Gonna go ahead and land this so we can get to cuting.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 444740c into lightningdevkit:mainJan 22, 2024
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jkczyz@codecov-commenter@TheBlueMatt
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Fix panic when peer is mid-handshake - #2842

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
jkczyz:2024-01-fix-peer-handler-unwrap
Jan 22, 2024
Merged

Fix panic when peer is mid-handshake#2842
TheBlueMatt merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
jkczyz:2024-01-fix-peer-handler-unwrap

Conversation

@jkczyz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Peer::their_node_id is set to Some during the handshake process. However, df3ab2e accesses the field unconditionally, causing a panic. This may be triggered if a gossip message is received mid-handshake from another peer or if the user calls broadcast_node_announcement during this time. The latter tends to be executed on a timer.

Update the fuzz test to call broadcast_node_announcement mid-handshake on an inbound channel in order to trigger a panic. Ensure that Peer::their_node_id is only accessed once the handshake is complete.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Jan 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Walkthrough

The codebase has been updated with a new functionality in the fuzz testing suite and minor refactoring in the peer handler of the lightning module. The fuzz testing now includes a scenario for broadcasting node announcements, enhancing the robustness of the network communication features. Meanwhile, the lightning module has seen a reorganization of code for better readability, along with the addition of log initialization within certain conditions, although the core logic remains untouched.

Changes

File PathChange Summary
fuzz/src/full_stack.rsAdded a new match arm for broadcasting node announcements in do_test function. Comments related to broadcasting node announcements have been added to the test module.
lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rsReordered code and added logger initialization within conditional blocks. The logic and control flow remain largely unchanged.

🐇✨
In the realm of code where the lightning plays,
A rabbit hopped through the algorithmic maze.
With a flip and a broadcast, the nodes announce,
"We're more robust!" the bytes joyfully pronounce. 📢🎉

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6b0ba8c and 3dee0cf.
Files selected for processing (2)
  • fuzz/src/full_stack.rs (3 hunks)
  • lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs
Additional comments: 1
fuzz/src/full_stack.rs (1)
  • 717-719: The addition of the match arm at line 17 to call broadcast_node_announcement during the handshake process is consistent with the PR's objective to replicate the panic scenario for the fuzz test.

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Jan 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: 3 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (5592378) 88.54% compared to head (c7465bd) 88.53%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

FilesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs0.00%3 Missing ⚠️

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #2842 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 88.54% 88.53% -0.01% 
==========================================
Files 115 115 Lines 92277 92277 Branches 92277 92277 ==========================================
- Hits 81706 81702 -4 - Misses 8068 8073 +5 + Partials 2503 2502 -1 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Actually, can you drop the fuzz change commit? I have a larger patch locally that I want to upstream that adds broader coverage.

Peer::their_node_id is set to Some during the handshake process.
However, df3ab2e accesses the field
unconditionally, causing a panic. This may be triggered if a gossip
message is received mid-handshake from another peer or if the user calls
broadcast_node_announcement during this time. The latter tends to be
executed on a timer.
Ensure that Peer::their_node_id is only accessed once the handshake is
complete.
@jkczyz
jkczyzforce-pushed the 2024-01-fix-peer-handler-unwrap branch from 3dee0cf to c7465bdCompareJanuary 22, 2024 21:36
@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt added this to the 0.0.122 milestone Jan 22, 2024

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6b0ba8c and c7465bd.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt modified the milestones: 0.0.122, 0.0.121Jan 22, 2024
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs Outdated
}
debug_assert!(peer.their_node_id.is_some());
debug_assert!(peer.channel_encryptor.is_ready_for_encryption());
let logger = WithContext::from(&self.logger, Some(peer.their_node_id.unwrap().0), None);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we also remove the unwrap while we're here?

Suggested change
let logger = WithContext::from(&self.logger,Some(peer.their_node_id.unwrap().0),None);
let logger = WithContext::from(&self.logger, peer.their_node_id.map(|p| p.0),None);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done here and few other places

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c7465bd and 7b8d018.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs (6 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Super straightforward patch, only real change is fewer unwraps. Gonna go ahead and land this so we can get to cuting.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 444740c into lightningdevkit:mainJan 22, 2024
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jkczyz@codecov-commenter@TheBlueMatt
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Fix panic when peer is mid-handshake - #2842

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
jkczyz:2024-01-fix-peer-handler-unwrap
Jan 22, 2024
Merged

Fix panic when peer is mid-handshake#2842
TheBlueMatt merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
jkczyz:2024-01-fix-peer-handler-unwrap

Conversation

@jkczyz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Peer::their_node_id is set to Some during the handshake process. However, df3ab2e accesses the field unconditionally, causing a panic. This may be triggered if a gossip message is received mid-handshake from another peer or if the user calls broadcast_node_announcement during this time. The latter tends to be executed on a timer.

Update the fuzz test to call broadcast_node_announcement mid-handshake on an inbound channel in order to trigger a panic. Ensure that Peer::their_node_id is only accessed once the handshake is complete.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Jan 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Walkthrough

The codebase has been updated with a new functionality in the fuzz testing suite and minor refactoring in the peer handler of the lightning module. The fuzz testing now includes a scenario for broadcasting node announcements, enhancing the robustness of the network communication features. Meanwhile, the lightning module has seen a reorganization of code for better readability, along with the addition of log initialization within certain conditions, although the core logic remains untouched.

Changes

File PathChange Summary
fuzz/src/full_stack.rsAdded a new match arm for broadcasting node announcements in do_test function. Comments related to broadcasting node announcements have been added to the test module.
lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rsReordered code and added logger initialization within conditional blocks. The logic and control flow remain largely unchanged.

🐇✨
In the realm of code where the lightning plays,
A rabbit hopped through the algorithmic maze.
With a flip and a broadcast, the nodes announce,
"We're more robust!" the bytes joyfully pronounce. 📢🎉

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6b0ba8c and 3dee0cf.
Files selected for processing (2)
  • fuzz/src/full_stack.rs (3 hunks)
  • lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs
Additional comments: 1
fuzz/src/full_stack.rs (1)
  • 717-719: The addition of the match arm at line 17 to call broadcast_node_announcement during the handshake process is consistent with the PR's objective to replicate the panic scenario for the fuzz test.

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Jan 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: 3 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (5592378) 88.54% compared to head (c7465bd) 88.53%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

FilesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs0.00%3 Missing ⚠️

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #2842 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 88.54% 88.53% -0.01% 
==========================================
Files 115 115 Lines 92277 92277 Branches 92277 92277 ==========================================
- Hits 81706 81702 -4 - Misses 8068 8073 +5 + Partials 2503 2502 -1 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Actually, can you drop the fuzz change commit? I have a larger patch locally that I want to upstream that adds broader coverage.

Peer::their_node_id is set to Some during the handshake process.
However, df3ab2e accesses the field
unconditionally, causing a panic. This may be triggered if a gossip
message is received mid-handshake from another peer or if the user calls
broadcast_node_announcement during this time. The latter tends to be
executed on a timer.
Ensure that Peer::their_node_id is only accessed once the handshake is
complete.
@jkczyz
jkczyzforce-pushed the 2024-01-fix-peer-handler-unwrap branch from 3dee0cf to c7465bdCompareJanuary 22, 2024 21:36
@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt added this to the 0.0.122 milestone Jan 22, 2024

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6b0ba8c and c7465bd.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt modified the milestones: 0.0.122, 0.0.121Jan 22, 2024
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs Outdated
}
debug_assert!(peer.their_node_id.is_some());
debug_assert!(peer.channel_encryptor.is_ready_for_encryption());
let logger = WithContext::from(&self.logger, Some(peer.their_node_id.unwrap().0), None);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we also remove the unwrap while we're here?

Suggested change
let logger = WithContext::from(&self.logger,Some(peer.their_node_id.unwrap().0),None);
let logger = WithContext::from(&self.logger, peer.their_node_id.map(|p| p.0),None);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done here and few other places

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c7465bd and 7b8d018.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs (6 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Super straightforward patch, only real change is fewer unwraps. Gonna go ahead and land this so we can get to cuting.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 444740c into lightningdevkit:mainJan 22, 2024
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jkczyz@codecov-commenter@TheBlueMatt
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Fix panic when peer is mid-handshake - #2842

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
jkczyz:2024-01-fix-peer-handler-unwrap
Jan 22, 2024
Merged

Fix panic when peer is mid-handshake#2842
TheBlueMatt merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
jkczyz:2024-01-fix-peer-handler-unwrap

Conversation

@jkczyz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Peer::their_node_id is set to Some during the handshake process. However, df3ab2e accesses the field unconditionally, causing a panic. This may be triggered if a gossip message is received mid-handshake from another peer or if the user calls broadcast_node_announcement during this time. The latter tends to be executed on a timer.

Update the fuzz test to call broadcast_node_announcement mid-handshake on an inbound channel in order to trigger a panic. Ensure that Peer::their_node_id is only accessed once the handshake is complete.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Jan 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Walkthrough

The codebase has been updated with a new functionality in the fuzz testing suite and minor refactoring in the peer handler of the lightning module. The fuzz testing now includes a scenario for broadcasting node announcements, enhancing the robustness of the network communication features. Meanwhile, the lightning module has seen a reorganization of code for better readability, along with the addition of log initialization within certain conditions, although the core logic remains untouched.

Changes

File PathChange Summary
fuzz/src/full_stack.rsAdded a new match arm for broadcasting node announcements in do_test function. Comments related to broadcasting node announcements have been added to the test module.
lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rsReordered code and added logger initialization within conditional blocks. The logic and control flow remain largely unchanged.

🐇✨
In the realm of code where the lightning plays,
A rabbit hopped through the algorithmic maze.
With a flip and a broadcast, the nodes announce,
"We're more robust!" the bytes joyfully pronounce. 📢🎉

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6b0ba8c and 3dee0cf.
Files selected for processing (2)
  • fuzz/src/full_stack.rs (3 hunks)
  • lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs
Additional comments: 1
fuzz/src/full_stack.rs (1)
  • 717-719: The addition of the match arm at line 17 to call broadcast_node_announcement during the handshake process is consistent with the PR's objective to replicate the panic scenario for the fuzz test.

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Jan 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: 3 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (5592378) 88.54% compared to head (c7465bd) 88.53%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

FilesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs0.00%3 Missing ⚠️

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #2842 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 88.54% 88.53% -0.01% 
==========================================
Files 115 115 Lines 92277 92277 Branches 92277 92277 ==========================================
- Hits 81706 81702 -4 - Misses 8068 8073 +5 + Partials 2503 2502 -1 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Actually, can you drop the fuzz change commit? I have a larger patch locally that I want to upstream that adds broader coverage.

Peer::their_node_id is set to Some during the handshake process.
However, df3ab2e accesses the field
unconditionally, causing a panic. This may be triggered if a gossip
message is received mid-handshake from another peer or if the user calls
broadcast_node_announcement during this time. The latter tends to be
executed on a timer.
Ensure that Peer::their_node_id is only accessed once the handshake is
complete.
@jkczyz
jkczyzforce-pushed the 2024-01-fix-peer-handler-unwrap branch from 3dee0cf to c7465bdCompareJanuary 22, 2024 21:36
@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt added this to the 0.0.122 milestone Jan 22, 2024

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6b0ba8c and c7465bd.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt modified the milestones: 0.0.122, 0.0.121Jan 22, 2024
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs Outdated
}
debug_assert!(peer.their_node_id.is_some());
debug_assert!(peer.channel_encryptor.is_ready_for_encryption());
let logger = WithContext::from(&self.logger, Some(peer.their_node_id.unwrap().0), None);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we also remove the unwrap while we're here?

Suggested change
let logger = WithContext::from(&self.logger,Some(peer.their_node_id.unwrap().0),None);
let logger = WithContext::from(&self.logger, peer.their_node_id.map(|p| p.0),None);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done here and few other places

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c7465bd and 7b8d018.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs (6 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Super straightforward patch, only real change is fewer unwraps. Gonna go ahead and land this so we can get to cuting.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 444740c into lightningdevkit:mainJan 22, 2024
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jkczyz@codecov-commenter@TheBlueMatt
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Fix panic when peer is mid-handshake - #2842

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
jkczyz:2024-01-fix-peer-handler-unwrap
Jan 22, 2024
Merged

Fix panic when peer is mid-handshake#2842
TheBlueMatt merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
jkczyz:2024-01-fix-peer-handler-unwrap

Conversation

@jkczyz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Peer::their_node_id is set to Some during the handshake process. However, df3ab2e accesses the field unconditionally, causing a panic. This may be triggered if a gossip message is received mid-handshake from another peer or if the user calls broadcast_node_announcement during this time. The latter tends to be executed on a timer.

Update the fuzz test to call broadcast_node_announcement mid-handshake on an inbound channel in order to trigger a panic. Ensure that Peer::their_node_id is only accessed once the handshake is complete.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Jan 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Walkthrough

The codebase has been updated with a new functionality in the fuzz testing suite and minor refactoring in the peer handler of the lightning module. The fuzz testing now includes a scenario for broadcasting node announcements, enhancing the robustness of the network communication features. Meanwhile, the lightning module has seen a reorganization of code for better readability, along with the addition of log initialization within certain conditions, although the core logic remains untouched.

Changes

File PathChange Summary
fuzz/src/full_stack.rsAdded a new match arm for broadcasting node announcements in do_test function. Comments related to broadcasting node announcements have been added to the test module.
lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rsReordered code and added logger initialization within conditional blocks. The logic and control flow remain largely unchanged.

🐇✨
In the realm of code where the lightning plays,
A rabbit hopped through the algorithmic maze.
With a flip and a broadcast, the nodes announce,
"We're more robust!" the bytes joyfully pronounce. 📢🎉

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6b0ba8c and 3dee0cf.
Files selected for processing (2)
  • fuzz/src/full_stack.rs (3 hunks)
  • lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs
Additional comments: 1
fuzz/src/full_stack.rs (1)
  • 717-719: The addition of the match arm at line 17 to call broadcast_node_announcement during the handshake process is consistent with the PR's objective to replicate the panic scenario for the fuzz test.

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Jan 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: 3 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (5592378) 88.54% compared to head (c7465bd) 88.53%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

FilesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs0.00%3 Missing ⚠️

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #2842 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 88.54% 88.53% -0.01% 
==========================================
Files 115 115 Lines 92277 92277 Branches 92277 92277 ==========================================
- Hits 81706 81702 -4 - Misses 8068 8073 +5 + Partials 2503 2502 -1 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Actually, can you drop the fuzz change commit? I have a larger patch locally that I want to upstream that adds broader coverage.

Peer::their_node_id is set to Some during the handshake process.
However, df3ab2e accesses the field
unconditionally, causing a panic. This may be triggered if a gossip
message is received mid-handshake from another peer or if the user calls
broadcast_node_announcement during this time. The latter tends to be
executed on a timer.
Ensure that Peer::their_node_id is only accessed once the handshake is
complete.
@jkczyz
jkczyzforce-pushed the 2024-01-fix-peer-handler-unwrap branch from 3dee0cf to c7465bdCompareJanuary 22, 2024 21:36
@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt added this to the 0.0.122 milestone Jan 22, 2024

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6b0ba8c and c7465bd.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt modified the milestones: 0.0.122, 0.0.121Jan 22, 2024
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs Outdated
}
debug_assert!(peer.their_node_id.is_some());
debug_assert!(peer.channel_encryptor.is_ready_for_encryption());
let logger = WithContext::from(&self.logger, Some(peer.their_node_id.unwrap().0), None);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we also remove the unwrap while we're here?

Suggested change
let logger = WithContext::from(&self.logger,Some(peer.their_node_id.unwrap().0),None);
let logger = WithContext::from(&self.logger, peer.their_node_id.map(|p| p.0),None);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done here and few other places

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c7465bd and 7b8d018.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs (6 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Super straightforward patch, only real change is fewer unwraps. Gonna go ahead and land this so we can get to cuting.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 444740c into lightningdevkit:mainJan 22, 2024
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jkczyz@codecov-commenter@TheBlueMatt
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Fix panic when peer is mid-handshake - #2842

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
jkczyz:2024-01-fix-peer-handler-unwrap
Jan 22, 2024
Merged

Fix panic when peer is mid-handshake#2842
TheBlueMatt merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
jkczyz:2024-01-fix-peer-handler-unwrap

Conversation

@jkczyz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Peer::their_node_id is set to Some during the handshake process. However, df3ab2e accesses the field unconditionally, causing a panic. This may be triggered if a gossip message is received mid-handshake from another peer or if the user calls broadcast_node_announcement during this time. The latter tends to be executed on a timer.

Update the fuzz test to call broadcast_node_announcement mid-handshake on an inbound channel in order to trigger a panic. Ensure that Peer::their_node_id is only accessed once the handshake is complete.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Jan 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Walkthrough

The codebase has been updated with a new functionality in the fuzz testing suite and minor refactoring in the peer handler of the lightning module. The fuzz testing now includes a scenario for broadcasting node announcements, enhancing the robustness of the network communication features. Meanwhile, the lightning module has seen a reorganization of code for better readability, along with the addition of log initialization within certain conditions, although the core logic remains untouched.

Changes

File PathChange Summary
fuzz/src/full_stack.rsAdded a new match arm for broadcasting node announcements in do_test function. Comments related to broadcasting node announcements have been added to the test module.
lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rsReordered code and added logger initialization within conditional blocks. The logic and control flow remain largely unchanged.

🐇✨
In the realm of code where the lightning plays,
A rabbit hopped through the algorithmic maze.
With a flip and a broadcast, the nodes announce,
"We're more robust!" the bytes joyfully pronounce. 📢🎉

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6b0ba8c and 3dee0cf.
Files selected for processing (2)
  • fuzz/src/full_stack.rs (3 hunks)
  • lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs
Additional comments: 1
fuzz/src/full_stack.rs (1)
  • 717-719: The addition of the match arm at line 17 to call broadcast_node_announcement during the handshake process is consistent with the PR's objective to replicate the panic scenario for the fuzz test.

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Jan 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: 3 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (5592378) 88.54% compared to head (c7465bd) 88.53%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

FilesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs0.00%3 Missing ⚠️

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #2842 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 88.54% 88.53% -0.01% 
==========================================
Files 115 115 Lines 92277 92277 Branches 92277 92277 ==========================================
- Hits 81706 81702 -4 - Misses 8068 8073 +5 + Partials 2503 2502 -1 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Actually, can you drop the fuzz change commit? I have a larger patch locally that I want to upstream that adds broader coverage.

Peer::their_node_id is set to Some during the handshake process.
However, df3ab2e accesses the field
unconditionally, causing a panic. This may be triggered if a gossip
message is received mid-handshake from another peer or if the user calls
broadcast_node_announcement during this time. The latter tends to be
executed on a timer.
Ensure that Peer::their_node_id is only accessed once the handshake is
complete.
@jkczyz
jkczyzforce-pushed the 2024-01-fix-peer-handler-unwrap branch from 3dee0cf to c7465bdCompareJanuary 22, 2024 21:36
@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt added this to the 0.0.122 milestone Jan 22, 2024

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6b0ba8c and c7465bd.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt modified the milestones: 0.0.122, 0.0.121Jan 22, 2024
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs Outdated
}
debug_assert!(peer.their_node_id.is_some());
debug_assert!(peer.channel_encryptor.is_ready_for_encryption());
let logger = WithContext::from(&self.logger, Some(peer.their_node_id.unwrap().0), None);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we also remove the unwrap while we're here?

Suggested change
let logger = WithContext::from(&self.logger,Some(peer.their_node_id.unwrap().0),None);
let logger = WithContext::from(&self.logger, peer.their_node_id.map(|p| p.0),None);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done here and few other places

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c7465bd and 7b8d018.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs (6 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Super straightforward patch, only real change is fewer unwraps. Gonna go ahead and land this so we can get to cuting.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 444740c into lightningdevkit:mainJan 22, 2024
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jkczyz@codecov-commenter@TheBlueMatt
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Fix panic when peer is mid-handshake - #2842

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
jkczyz:2024-01-fix-peer-handler-unwrap
Jan 22, 2024
Merged

Fix panic when peer is mid-handshake#2842
TheBlueMatt merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
jkczyz:2024-01-fix-peer-handler-unwrap

Conversation

@jkczyz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Peer::their_node_id is set to Some during the handshake process. However, df3ab2e accesses the field unconditionally, causing a panic. This may be triggered if a gossip message is received mid-handshake from another peer or if the user calls broadcast_node_announcement during this time. The latter tends to be executed on a timer.

Update the fuzz test to call broadcast_node_announcement mid-handshake on an inbound channel in order to trigger a panic. Ensure that Peer::their_node_id is only accessed once the handshake is complete.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Jan 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Walkthrough

The codebase has been updated with a new functionality in the fuzz testing suite and minor refactoring in the peer handler of the lightning module. The fuzz testing now includes a scenario for broadcasting node announcements, enhancing the robustness of the network communication features. Meanwhile, the lightning module has seen a reorganization of code for better readability, along with the addition of log initialization within certain conditions, although the core logic remains untouched.

Changes

File PathChange Summary
fuzz/src/full_stack.rsAdded a new match arm for broadcasting node announcements in do_test function. Comments related to broadcasting node announcements have been added to the test module.
lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rsReordered code and added logger initialization within conditional blocks. The logic and control flow remain largely unchanged.

🐇✨
In the realm of code where the lightning plays,
A rabbit hopped through the algorithmic maze.
With a flip and a broadcast, the nodes announce,
"We're more robust!" the bytes joyfully pronounce. 📢🎉

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6b0ba8c and 3dee0cf.
Files selected for processing (2)
  • fuzz/src/full_stack.rs (3 hunks)
  • lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs
Additional comments: 1
fuzz/src/full_stack.rs (1)
  • 717-719: The addition of the match arm at line 17 to call broadcast_node_announcement during the handshake process is consistent with the PR's objective to replicate the panic scenario for the fuzz test.

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Jan 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: 3 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (5592378) 88.54% compared to head (c7465bd) 88.53%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

FilesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs0.00%3 Missing ⚠️

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #2842 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 88.54% 88.53% -0.01% 
==========================================
Files 115 115 Lines 92277 92277 Branches 92277 92277 ==========================================
- Hits 81706 81702 -4 - Misses 8068 8073 +5 + Partials 2503 2502 -1 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Actually, can you drop the fuzz change commit? I have a larger patch locally that I want to upstream that adds broader coverage.

Peer::their_node_id is set to Some during the handshake process.
However, df3ab2e accesses the field
unconditionally, causing a panic. This may be triggered if a gossip
message is received mid-handshake from another peer or if the user calls
broadcast_node_announcement during this time. The latter tends to be
executed on a timer.
Ensure that Peer::their_node_id is only accessed once the handshake is
complete.
@jkczyz
jkczyzforce-pushed the 2024-01-fix-peer-handler-unwrap branch from 3dee0cf to c7465bdCompareJanuary 22, 2024 21:36
@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt added this to the 0.0.122 milestone Jan 22, 2024

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6b0ba8c and c7465bd.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt modified the milestones: 0.0.122, 0.0.121Jan 22, 2024
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs Outdated
}
debug_assert!(peer.their_node_id.is_some());
debug_assert!(peer.channel_encryptor.is_ready_for_encryption());
let logger = WithContext::from(&self.logger, Some(peer.their_node_id.unwrap().0), None);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we also remove the unwrap while we're here?

Suggested change
let logger = WithContext::from(&self.logger,Some(peer.their_node_id.unwrap().0),None);
let logger = WithContext::from(&self.logger, peer.their_node_id.map(|p| p.0),None);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done here and few other places

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c7465bd and 7b8d018.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs (6 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Super straightforward patch, only real change is fewer unwraps. Gonna go ahead and land this so we can get to cuting.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 444740c into lightningdevkit:mainJan 22, 2024
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jkczyz@codecov-commenter@TheBlueMatt
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Fix panic when peer is mid-handshake - #2842

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
jkczyz:2024-01-fix-peer-handler-unwrap
Jan 22, 2024
Merged

Fix panic when peer is mid-handshake#2842
TheBlueMatt merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
jkczyz:2024-01-fix-peer-handler-unwrap

Conversation

@jkczyz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Peer::their_node_id is set to Some during the handshake process. However, df3ab2e accesses the field unconditionally, causing a panic. This may be triggered if a gossip message is received mid-handshake from another peer or if the user calls broadcast_node_announcement during this time. The latter tends to be executed on a timer.

Update the fuzz test to call broadcast_node_announcement mid-handshake on an inbound channel in order to trigger a panic. Ensure that Peer::their_node_id is only accessed once the handshake is complete.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Jan 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Walkthrough

The codebase has been updated with a new functionality in the fuzz testing suite and minor refactoring in the peer handler of the lightning module. The fuzz testing now includes a scenario for broadcasting node announcements, enhancing the robustness of the network communication features. Meanwhile, the lightning module has seen a reorganization of code for better readability, along with the addition of log initialization within certain conditions, although the core logic remains untouched.

Changes

File PathChange Summary
fuzz/src/full_stack.rsAdded a new match arm for broadcasting node announcements in do_test function. Comments related to broadcasting node announcements have been added to the test module.
lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rsReordered code and added logger initialization within conditional blocks. The logic and control flow remain largely unchanged.

🐇✨
In the realm of code where the lightning plays,
A rabbit hopped through the algorithmic maze.
With a flip and a broadcast, the nodes announce,
"We're more robust!" the bytes joyfully pronounce. 📢🎉

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6b0ba8c and 3dee0cf.
Files selected for processing (2)
  • fuzz/src/full_stack.rs (3 hunks)
  • lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs
Additional comments: 1
fuzz/src/full_stack.rs (1)
  • 717-719: The addition of the match arm at line 17 to call broadcast_node_announcement during the handshake process is consistent with the PR's objective to replicate the panic scenario for the fuzz test.

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Jan 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: 3 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (5592378) 88.54% compared to head (c7465bd) 88.53%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

FilesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs0.00%3 Missing ⚠️

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #2842 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 88.54% 88.53% -0.01% 
==========================================
Files 115 115 Lines 92277 92277 Branches 92277 92277 ==========================================
- Hits 81706 81702 -4 - Misses 8068 8073 +5 + Partials 2503 2502 -1 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Actually, can you drop the fuzz change commit? I have a larger patch locally that I want to upstream that adds broader coverage.

Peer::their_node_id is set to Some during the handshake process.
However, df3ab2e accesses the field
unconditionally, causing a panic. This may be triggered if a gossip
message is received mid-handshake from another peer or if the user calls
broadcast_node_announcement during this time. The latter tends to be
executed on a timer.
Ensure that Peer::their_node_id is only accessed once the handshake is
complete.
@jkczyz
jkczyzforce-pushed the 2024-01-fix-peer-handler-unwrap branch from 3dee0cf to c7465bdCompareJanuary 22, 2024 21:36
@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt added this to the 0.0.122 milestone Jan 22, 2024

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6b0ba8c and c7465bd.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt modified the milestones: 0.0.122, 0.0.121Jan 22, 2024
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs Outdated
}
debug_assert!(peer.their_node_id.is_some());
debug_assert!(peer.channel_encryptor.is_ready_for_encryption());
let logger = WithContext::from(&self.logger, Some(peer.their_node_id.unwrap().0), None);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we also remove the unwrap while we're here?

Suggested change
let logger = WithContext::from(&self.logger,Some(peer.their_node_id.unwrap().0),None);
let logger = WithContext::from(&self.logger, peer.their_node_id.map(|p| p.0),None);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done here and few other places

@coderabbitaicoderabbitaiBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c7465bd and 7b8d018.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs (6 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Super straightforward patch, only real change is fewer unwraps. Gonna go ahead and land this so we can get to cuting.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 444740c into lightningdevkit:mainJan 22, 2024
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jkczyz@codecov-commenter@TheBlueMatt