Add compliance context to transactions#823

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
jklein24 merged 1 commit into from
Aug 14, 2026
Merged

Add compliance context to transactions #823

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
22 changes: 21 additions & 1 deletion mintlify/openapi.yaml
View file
Open in desktop

Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.

22 changes: 21 additions & 1 deletion openapi.yaml
View file
Open in desktop

Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.

6 changes: 4 additions & 2 deletions openapi/components/schemas/transactions/IncomingTransactionFailureReason.yaml
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -8,7 +8,9 @@ enum:
- MISSING_MANDATORY_PAYEE_DATA
- QUOTE_EXPIRED
- QUOTE_EXECUTION_FAILED
- COMPLIANCE_REJECTED

@shreyavshreyavAug 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i think jason just added this so might need a rebase, rest lgtm

@ls-boltls-boltBotAug 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rebased onto current main with #689 included and reconciled the overlap. #823 now preserves #689’s complete outgoing failure-reason contract and only adds the incoming COMPLIANCE_REJECTED value plus shared pending context. make build is reproducible and make lint-openapi reports 0 errors.

@jklein24jklein24Aug 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like he did for Outgoing, but this is Incoming.

@ls-boltls-boltBotAug 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Correct — #689 owns the outgoing contract, while this PR still needs COMPLIANCE_REJECTED on incoming deposits. The rebased diff now reflects exactly that split.

@ls-boltls-boltBotAug 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rebased and resolved — the current diff now preserves #689’s complete outgoing contract and keeps only the incoming compliance rejection plus shared pending context from this PR.

description: >-
Reason for failure of an incoming transaction. This is used to provide more
context on why a transaction failed. If the transaction is not in a failed
state, this field is omitted.
context on why a transaction failed. COMPLIANCE_REJECTED means compliance
blocked the incoming funds. If the transaction is not in a failed state,
this field is omitted.
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions openapi/components/schemas/transactions/Transaction.yaml
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -14,6 +14,11 @@ properties:
example: Transaction:019542f5-b3e7-1d02-0000-000000000004
status:
$ref: ./TransactionStatus.yaml
pendingReason:
$ref: ./TransactionPendingReason.yaml
description: >-
Present when compliance review or required customer action is delaying
settlement.
type:
$ref: ./TransactionType.yaml
direction:
Expand Down
15 changes: 15 additions & 0 deletions openapi/components/schemas/transactions/TransactionPendingReason.yaml
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
type: string
enum:
- COUNTERPARTY_DECLARATION_REQUIRED
- WALLET_VERIFICATION_REQUIRED
- COUNTERPARTY_INFORMATION_REQUIRED
- COMPLIANCE_REVIEW
description: |
Why a transaction is pending.

| Reason | Description |
|--------|-------------|
| `COUNTERPARTY_DECLARATION_REQUIRED` | The customer must declare who controls the sending wallet. |
| `WALLET_VERIFICATION_REQUIRED` | The customer must verify ownership of the sending wallet. |
| `COUNTERPARTY_INFORMATION_REQUIRED` | Information about the sender is required. |
| `COMPLIANCE_REVIEW` | The customer's action is complete and the deposit remains under compliance review. |
Loading
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

Skip to content
Add compliance context to transactions#823

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

 Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and
privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?
Sign in
to your account

 Merged

jklein24
merged 1 commit into

from

Aug 14, 2026
 Merged


Add compliance context to transactions
#823
Show file tree
Hide file tree
 Changes from all commits
Commits

Show all changes


1 commit


Select commit


File filter

Filter by extension
Filter by extension
Conversations

Failed to load comments. 
Loading
Jump to

Jump to file


Failed to load files. 
Loading
 Diff view

 Diff view


22 changes: 21 additions & 1 deletion
mintlify/openapi.yaml

View file


Open in desktop


Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.


22 changes: 21 additions & 1 deletion
openapi.yaml

View file


Open in desktop


Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.


6 changes: 4 additions & 2 deletions
openapi/components/schemas/transactions/IncomingTransactionFailureReason.yaml

View file


Open in desktop

Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -8,7 +8,9 @@ enum:
 - MISSING_MANDATORY_PAYEE_DATA
 - QUOTE_EXPIRED
 - QUOTE_EXECUTION_FAILED
 - COMPLIANCE_REJECTED
@shreyavshreyavAug 13, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i think jason just added this so might need a rebase, rest lgtm
@ls-boltls-boltBotAug 13, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rebased onto current main with #689 included and reconciled the overlap. #823 now preserves #689’s complete outgoing failure-reason contract and only adds the incoming COMPLIANCE_REJECTED value plus shared pending context. make build is reproducible and make lint-openapi reports 0 errors.
@jklein24jklein24Aug 13, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like he did for Outgoing, but this is Incoming.
@ls-boltls-boltBotAug 13, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Correct — #689 owns the outgoing contract, while this PR still needs COMPLIANCE_REJECTED on incoming deposits. The rebased diff now reflects exactly that split.
@ls-boltls-boltBotAug 13, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rebased and resolved — the current diff now preserves #689’s complete outgoing contract and keeps only the incoming compliance rejection plus shared pending context from this PR.
description: >-
 Reason for failure of an incoming transaction. This is used to provide more
 context on why a transaction failed. If the transaction is not in a failed
 state, this field is omitted.
 context on why a transaction failed. COMPLIANCE_REJECTED means compliance
 blocked the incoming funds. If the transaction is not in a failed state,
 this field is omitted.

5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions
openapi/components/schemas/transactions/Transaction.yaml

View file


Open in desktop

Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -14,6 +14,11 @@ properties:
 example: Transaction:019542f5-b3e7-1d02-0000-000000000004
 status:
 $ref: ./TransactionStatus.yaml
 pendingReason:
 $ref: ./TransactionPendingReason.yaml
 description: >-
 Present when compliance review or required customer action is delaying
 settlement.
 type:
 $ref: ./TransactionType.yaml
 direction:
Expand Down

15 changes: 15 additions & 0 deletions
openapi/components/schemas/transactions/TransactionPendingReason.yaml

View file


Open in desktop

Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
type: string
enum:
 - COUNTERPARTY_DECLARATION_REQUIRED
 - WALLET_VERIFICATION_REQUIRED
 - COUNTERPARTY_INFORMATION_REQUIRED
 - COMPLIANCE_REVIEW
description: |
 Why a transaction is pending.

 | Reason | Description |
 |--------|-------------|
 | `COUNTERPARTY_DECLARATION_REQUIRED` | The customer must declare who controls the sending wallet. |
 | `WALLET_VERIFICATION_REQUIRED` | The customer must verify ownership of the sending wallet. |
 | `COUNTERPARTY_INFORMATION_REQUIRED` | Information about the sender is required. |
 | `COMPLIANCE_REVIEW` | The customer's action is complete and the deposit remains under compliance review. |
Loading

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode
(function() {
var style = document.createElement('style');
style.textContent = '
.markdown-body {
color-scheme: dark light;
}
.markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }
.markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }
.markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }
.markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }
.markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }
.markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }
';
document.head.appendChild(style);
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Add compliance context to transactions#823

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

 Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and
privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?
Sign in
to your account

 Merged

jklein24
merged 1 commit into

from

Aug 14, 2026
 Merged


Add compliance context to transactions
#823
Show file tree
Hide file tree
 Changes from all commits
Commits

Show all changes


1 commit


Select commit


File filter

Filter by extension
Filter by extension
Conversations

Failed to load comments. 
Loading
Jump to

Jump to file


Failed to load files. 
Loading
 Diff view

 Diff view


22 changes: 21 additions & 1 deletion
mintlify/openapi.yaml

View file


Open in desktop


Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.


22 changes: 21 additions & 1 deletion
openapi.yaml

View file


Open in desktop


Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.


6 changes: 4 additions & 2 deletions
openapi/components/schemas/transactions/IncomingTransactionFailureReason.yaml

View file


Open in desktop

Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -8,7 +8,9 @@ enum:
 - MISSING_MANDATORY_PAYEE_DATA
 - QUOTE_EXPIRED
 - QUOTE_EXECUTION_FAILED
 - COMPLIANCE_REJECTED
@shreyavshreyavAug 13, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i think jason just added this so might need a rebase, rest lgtm
@ls-boltls-boltBotAug 13, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rebased onto current main with #689 included and reconciled the overlap. #823 now preserves #689’s complete outgoing failure-reason contract and only adds the incoming COMPLIANCE_REJECTED value plus shared pending context. make build is reproducible and make lint-openapi reports 0 errors.
@jklein24jklein24Aug 13, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like he did for Outgoing, but this is Incoming.
@ls-boltls-boltBotAug 13, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Correct — #689 owns the outgoing contract, while this PR still needs COMPLIANCE_REJECTED on incoming deposits. The rebased diff now reflects exactly that split.
@ls-boltls-boltBotAug 13, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rebased and resolved — the current diff now preserves #689’s complete outgoing contract and keeps only the incoming compliance rejection plus shared pending context from this PR.
description: >-
 Reason for failure of an incoming transaction. This is used to provide more
 context on why a transaction failed. If the transaction is not in a failed
 state, this field is omitted.
 context on why a transaction failed. COMPLIANCE_REJECTED means compliance
 blocked the incoming funds. If the transaction is not in a failed state,
 this field is omitted.

5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions
openapi/components/schemas/transactions/Transaction.yaml

View file


Open in desktop

Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -14,6 +14,11 @@ properties:
 example: Transaction:019542f5-b3e7-1d02-0000-000000000004
 status:
 $ref: ./TransactionStatus.yaml
 pendingReason:
 $ref: ./TransactionPendingReason.yaml
 description: >-
 Present when compliance review or required customer action is delaying
 settlement.
 type:
 $ref: ./TransactionType.yaml
 direction:
Expand Down

15 changes: 15 additions & 0 deletions
openapi/components/schemas/transactions/TransactionPendingReason.yaml

View file


Open in desktop

Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
type: string
enum:
 - COUNTERPARTY_DECLARATION_REQUIRED
 - WALLET_VERIFICATION_REQUIRED
 - COUNTERPARTY_INFORMATION_REQUIRED
 - COMPLIANCE_REVIEW
description: |
 Why a transaction is pending.

 | Reason | Description |
 |--------|-------------|
 | `COUNTERPARTY_DECLARATION_REQUIRED` | The customer must declare who controls the sending wallet. |
 | `WALLET_VERIFICATION_REQUIRED` | The customer must verify ownership of the sending wallet. |
 | `COUNTERPARTY_INFORMATION_REQUIRED` | Information about the sender is required. |
 | `COMPLIANCE_REVIEW` | The customer's action is complete and the deposit remains under compliance review. |
Loading

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer
(function() {
var ref = document.referrer;
var terms = [];
if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {
var url = new URL(ref);
var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');
if (q) {
terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });
}
}
if (terms.length === 0) return;
var style = document.createElement('style');
style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';
document.head.appendChild(style);
function highlight(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node
var text = node.textContent;
var found = false;
terms.forEach(function(term) {
var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi');
if (regex.test(text)) {
found = true;
var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();
var parts = text.split(regex);
parts.forEach(function(part, i) {
if (i % 2 === 0) {
frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));
} else {
var span = document.createElement('span');
span.className = 'userscript-highlight';
span.textContent = part;
frag.appendChild(span);
}
});
node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);
}
});
} else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element
var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];
if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {
Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);
}
}
}
highlight(document.body);
// Re-highlight on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
mutations.forEach(function(m) {
m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);
});
});
});
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Add compliance context to transactions#823

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

 Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and
privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?
Sign in
to your account

 Merged

jklein24
merged 1 commit into

from

Aug 14, 2026
 Merged


Add compliance context to transactions
#823
Show file tree
Hide file tree
 Changes from all commits
Commits

Show all changes


1 commit


Select commit


File filter

Filter by extension
Filter by extension
Conversations

Failed to load comments. 
Loading
Jump to

Jump to file


Failed to load files. 
Loading
 Diff view

 Diff view


22 changes: 21 additions & 1 deletion
mintlify/openapi.yaml

View file


Open in desktop


Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.


22 changes: 21 additions & 1 deletion
openapi.yaml

View file


Open in desktop


Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.


6 changes: 4 additions & 2 deletions
openapi/components/schemas/transactions/IncomingTransactionFailureReason.yaml

View file


Open in desktop

Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -8,7 +8,9 @@ enum:
 - MISSING_MANDATORY_PAYEE_DATA
 - QUOTE_EXPIRED
 - QUOTE_EXECUTION_FAILED
 - COMPLIANCE_REJECTED
@shreyavshreyavAug 13, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i think jason just added this so might need a rebase, rest lgtm
@ls-boltls-boltBotAug 13, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rebased onto current main with #689 included and reconciled the overlap. #823 now preserves #689’s complete outgoing failure-reason contract and only adds the incoming COMPLIANCE_REJECTED value plus shared pending context. make build is reproducible and make lint-openapi reports 0 errors.
@jklein24jklein24Aug 13, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like he did for Outgoing, but this is Incoming.
@ls-boltls-boltBotAug 13, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Correct — #689 owns the outgoing contract, while this PR still needs COMPLIANCE_REJECTED on incoming deposits. The rebased diff now reflects exactly that split.
@ls-boltls-boltBotAug 13, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rebased and resolved — the current diff now preserves #689’s complete outgoing contract and keeps only the incoming compliance rejection plus shared pending context from this PR.
description: >-
 Reason for failure of an incoming transaction. This is used to provide more
 context on why a transaction failed. If the transaction is not in a failed
 state, this field is omitted.
 context on why a transaction failed. COMPLIANCE_REJECTED means compliance
 blocked the incoming funds. If the transaction is not in a failed state,
 this field is omitted.

5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions
openapi/components/schemas/transactions/Transaction.yaml

View file


Open in desktop

Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -14,6 +14,11 @@ properties:
 example: Transaction:019542f5-b3e7-1d02-0000-000000000004
 status:
 $ref: ./TransactionStatus.yaml
 pendingReason:
 $ref: ./TransactionPendingReason.yaml
 description: >-
 Present when compliance review or required customer action is delaying
 settlement.
 type:
 $ref: ./TransactionType.yaml
 direction:
Expand Down

15 changes: 15 additions & 0 deletions
openapi/components/schemas/transactions/TransactionPendingReason.yaml

View file


Open in desktop

Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
type: string
enum:
 - COUNTERPARTY_DECLARATION_REQUIRED
 - WALLET_VERIFICATION_REQUIRED
 - COUNTERPARTY_INFORMATION_REQUIRED
 - COMPLIANCE_REVIEW
description: |
 Why a transaction is pending.

 | Reason | Description |
 |--------|-------------|
 | `COUNTERPARTY_DECLARATION_REQUIRED` | The customer must declare who controls the sending wallet. |
 | `WALLET_VERIFICATION_REQUIRED` | The customer must verify ownership of the sending wallet. |
 | `COUNTERPARTY_INFORMATION_REQUIRED` | Information about the sender is required. |
 | `COMPLIANCE_REVIEW` | The customer's action is complete and the deposit remains under compliance review. |
Loading

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page
(function() {
var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',
'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',
'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];
function cleanUrl(url) {
try {
var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);
var changed = false;
trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {
if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {
u.searchParams.delete(p);
changed = true;
}
});
return changed ? u.toString() : url;
} catch (e) {
return url;
}
}
function cleanLinks() {
document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {
var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);
if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;
});
}
cleanLinks();
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
mutations.forEach(function(m) {
m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 1) {
if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();
node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {
var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);
if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;
});
}
});
});
});
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

Skip to content
Add compliance context to transactions#823

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

 Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and
privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?
Sign in
to your account

 Merged

jklein24
merged 1 commit into

from

Aug 14, 2026
 Merged


Add compliance context to transactions
#823
Show file tree
Hide file tree
 Changes from all commits
Commits

Show all changes


1 commit


Select commit


File filter

Filter by extension
Filter by extension
Conversations

Failed to load comments. 
Loading
Jump to

Jump to file


Failed to load files. 
Loading
 Diff view

 Diff view


22 changes: 21 additions & 1 deletion
mintlify/openapi.yaml

View file


Open in desktop


Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.


22 changes: 21 additions & 1 deletion
openapi.yaml

View file


Open in desktop


Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.


6 changes: 4 additions & 2 deletions
openapi/components/schemas/transactions/IncomingTransactionFailureReason.yaml

View file


Open in desktop

Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -8,7 +8,9 @@ enum:
 - MISSING_MANDATORY_PAYEE_DATA
 - QUOTE_EXPIRED
 - QUOTE_EXECUTION_FAILED
 - COMPLIANCE_REJECTED
@shreyavshreyavAug 13, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i think jason just added this so might need a rebase, rest lgtm
@ls-boltls-boltBotAug 13, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rebased onto current main with #689 included and reconciled the overlap. #823 now preserves #689’s complete outgoing failure-reason contract and only adds the incoming COMPLIANCE_REJECTED value plus shared pending context. make build is reproducible and make lint-openapi reports 0 errors.
@jklein24jklein24Aug 13, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like he did for Outgoing, but this is Incoming.
@ls-boltls-boltBotAug 13, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Correct — #689 owns the outgoing contract, while this PR still needs COMPLIANCE_REJECTED on incoming deposits. The rebased diff now reflects exactly that split.
@ls-boltls-boltBotAug 13, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rebased and resolved — the current diff now preserves #689’s complete outgoing contract and keeps only the incoming compliance rejection plus shared pending context from this PR.
description: >-
 Reason for failure of an incoming transaction. This is used to provide more
 context on why a transaction failed. If the transaction is not in a failed
 state, this field is omitted.
 context on why a transaction failed. COMPLIANCE_REJECTED means compliance
 blocked the incoming funds. If the transaction is not in a failed state,
 this field is omitted.

5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions
openapi/components/schemas/transactions/Transaction.yaml

View file


Open in desktop

Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -14,6 +14,11 @@ properties:
 example: Transaction:019542f5-b3e7-1d02-0000-000000000004
 status:
 $ref: ./TransactionStatus.yaml
 pendingReason:
 $ref: ./TransactionPendingReason.yaml
 description: >-
 Present when compliance review or required customer action is delaying
 settlement.
 type:
 $ref: ./TransactionType.yaml
 direction:
Expand Down

15 changes: 15 additions & 0 deletions
openapi/components/schemas/transactions/TransactionPendingReason.yaml

View file


Open in desktop

Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
type: string
enum:
 - COUNTERPARTY_DECLARATION_REQUIRED
 - WALLET_VERIFICATION_REQUIRED
 - COUNTERPARTY_INFORMATION_REQUIRED
 - COMPLIANCE_REVIEW
description: |
 Why a transaction is pending.

 | Reason | Description |
 |--------|-------------|
 | `COUNTERPARTY_DECLARATION_REQUIRED` | The customer must declare who controls the sending wallet. |
 | `WALLET_VERIFICATION_REQUIRED` | The customer must verify ownership of the sending wallet. |
 | `COUNTERPARTY_INFORMATION_REQUIRED` | Information about the sender is required. |
 | `COMPLIANCE_REVIEW` | The customer's action is complete and the deposit remains under compliance review. |
Loading

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube
(function() {
function tryTheater() {
var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]');
if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {
btn.click();
}
}
// Try immediately
tryTheater();
// Try after navigation (SPA)
var lastUrl = location.href;
setInterval(function() {
if (location.href !== lastUrl) {
lastUrl = location.href;
setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);
}
}, 1000);
// Also try on player load
var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Add compliance context to transactions#823

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

 Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and
privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?
Sign in
to your account

 Merged

jklein24
merged 1 commit into

from

Aug 14, 2026
 Merged


Add compliance context to transactions
#823
Show file tree
Hide file tree
 Changes from all commits
Commits

Show all changes


1 commit


Select commit


File filter

Filter by extension
Filter by extension
Conversations

Failed to load comments. 
Loading
Jump to

Jump to file


Failed to load files. 
Loading
 Diff view

 Diff view


22 changes: 21 additions & 1 deletion
mintlify/openapi.yaml

View file


Open in desktop


Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.


22 changes: 21 additions & 1 deletion
openapi.yaml

View file


Open in desktop


Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.


6 changes: 4 additions & 2 deletions
openapi/components/schemas/transactions/IncomingTransactionFailureReason.yaml

View file


Open in desktop

Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -8,7 +8,9 @@ enum:
 - MISSING_MANDATORY_PAYEE_DATA
 - QUOTE_EXPIRED
 - QUOTE_EXECUTION_FAILED
 - COMPLIANCE_REJECTED
@shreyavshreyavAug 13, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i think jason just added this so might need a rebase, rest lgtm
@ls-boltls-boltBotAug 13, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rebased onto current main with #689 included and reconciled the overlap. #823 now preserves #689’s complete outgoing failure-reason contract and only adds the incoming COMPLIANCE_REJECTED value plus shared pending context. make build is reproducible and make lint-openapi reports 0 errors.
@jklein24jklein24Aug 13, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like he did for Outgoing, but this is Incoming.
@ls-boltls-boltBotAug 13, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Correct — #689 owns the outgoing contract, while this PR still needs COMPLIANCE_REJECTED on incoming deposits. The rebased diff now reflects exactly that split.
@ls-boltls-boltBotAug 13, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rebased and resolved — the current diff now preserves #689’s complete outgoing contract and keeps only the incoming compliance rejection plus shared pending context from this PR.
description: >-
 Reason for failure of an incoming transaction. This is used to provide more
 context on why a transaction failed. If the transaction is not in a failed
 state, this field is omitted.
 context on why a transaction failed. COMPLIANCE_REJECTED means compliance
 blocked the incoming funds. If the transaction is not in a failed state,
 this field is omitted.

5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions
openapi/components/schemas/transactions/Transaction.yaml

View file


Open in desktop

Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -14,6 +14,11 @@ properties:
 example: Transaction:019542f5-b3e7-1d02-0000-000000000004
 status:
 $ref: ./TransactionStatus.yaml
 pendingReason:
 $ref: ./TransactionPendingReason.yaml
 description: >-
 Present when compliance review or required customer action is delaying
 settlement.
 type:
 $ref: ./TransactionType.yaml
 direction:
Expand Down

15 changes: 15 additions & 0 deletions
openapi/components/schemas/transactions/TransactionPendingReason.yaml

View file


Open in desktop

Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
type: string
enum:
 - COUNTERPARTY_DECLARATION_REQUIRED
 - WALLET_VERIFICATION_REQUIRED
 - COUNTERPARTY_INFORMATION_REQUIRED
 - COMPLIANCE_REVIEW
description: |
 Why a transaction is pending.

 | Reason | Description |
 |--------|-------------|
 | `COUNTERPARTY_DECLARATION_REQUIRED` | The customer must declare who controls the sending wallet. |
 | `WALLET_VERIFICATION_REQUIRED` | The customer must verify ownership of the sending wallet. |
 | `COUNTERPARTY_INFORMATION_REQUIRED` | Information about the sender is required. |
 | `COMPLIANCE_REVIEW` | The customer's action is complete and the deposit remains under compliance review. |
Loading

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content
(function() {
function unstick() {
document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) {
if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {
el.style.position = 'static';
el.style.top = 'auto';
el.style.zIndex = 'auto';
}
});
}
unstick();
var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Add compliance context to transactions#823

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

 Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and
privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?
Sign in
to your account

 Merged

jklein24
merged 1 commit into

from

Aug 14, 2026
 Merged


Add compliance context to transactions
#823
Show file tree
Hide file tree
 Changes from all commits
Commits

Show all changes


1 commit


Select commit


File filter

Filter by extension
Filter by extension
Conversations

Failed to load comments. 
Loading
Jump to

Jump to file


Failed to load files. 
Loading
 Diff view

 Diff view


22 changes: 21 additions & 1 deletion
mintlify/openapi.yaml

View file


Open in desktop


Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.


22 changes: 21 additions & 1 deletion
openapi.yaml

View file


Open in desktop


Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.


6 changes: 4 additions & 2 deletions
openapi/components/schemas/transactions/IncomingTransactionFailureReason.yaml

View file


Open in desktop

Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -8,7 +8,9 @@ enum:
 - MISSING_MANDATORY_PAYEE_DATA
 - QUOTE_EXPIRED
 - QUOTE_EXECUTION_FAILED
 - COMPLIANCE_REJECTED
@shreyavshreyavAug 13, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i think jason just added this so might need a rebase, rest lgtm
@ls-boltls-boltBotAug 13, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rebased onto current main with #689 included and reconciled the overlap. #823 now preserves #689’s complete outgoing failure-reason contract and only adds the incoming COMPLIANCE_REJECTED value plus shared pending context. make build is reproducible and make lint-openapi reports 0 errors.
@jklein24jklein24Aug 13, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like he did for Outgoing, but this is Incoming.
@ls-boltls-boltBotAug 13, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Correct — #689 owns the outgoing contract, while this PR still needs COMPLIANCE_REJECTED on incoming deposits. The rebased diff now reflects exactly that split.
@ls-boltls-boltBotAug 13, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rebased and resolved — the current diff now preserves #689’s complete outgoing contract and keeps only the incoming compliance rejection plus shared pending context from this PR.
description: >-
 Reason for failure of an incoming transaction. This is used to provide more
 context on why a transaction failed. If the transaction is not in a failed
 state, this field is omitted.
 context on why a transaction failed. COMPLIANCE_REJECTED means compliance
 blocked the incoming funds. If the transaction is not in a failed state,
 this field is omitted.

5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions
openapi/components/schemas/transactions/Transaction.yaml

View file


Open in desktop

Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -14,6 +14,11 @@ properties:
 example: Transaction:019542f5-b3e7-1d02-0000-000000000004
 status:
 $ref: ./TransactionStatus.yaml
 pendingReason:
 $ref: ./TransactionPendingReason.yaml
 description: >-
 Present when compliance review or required customer action is delaying
 settlement.
 type:
 $ref: ./TransactionType.yaml
 direction:
Expand Down

15 changes: 15 additions & 0 deletions
openapi/components/schemas/transactions/TransactionPendingReason.yaml

View file


Open in desktop

Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
type: string
enum:
 - COUNTERPARTY_DECLARATION_REQUIRED
 - WALLET_VERIFICATION_REQUIRED
 - COUNTERPARTY_INFORMATION_REQUIRED
 - COMPLIANCE_REVIEW
description: |
 Why a transaction is pending.

 | Reason | Description |
 |--------|-------------|
 | `COUNTERPARTY_DECLARATION_REQUIRED` | The customer must declare who controls the sending wallet. |
 | `WALLET_VERIFICATION_REQUIRED` | The customer must verify ownership of the sending wallet. |
 | `COUNTERPARTY_INFORMATION_REQUIRED` | Information about the sender is required. |
 | `COMPLIANCE_REVIEW` | The customer's action is complete and the deposit remains under compliance review. |
Loading

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site
(function() {
var enabled = true;
function applyDarkMode() {
if (!enabled) return;
// Create style element if it doesn't exist
var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');
if (!style) {
style = document.createElement('style');
style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';
document.head.appendChild(style);
}
// Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video
style.textContent = '
/* Invert everything except media */
html {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
background: #1a1a2e !important;
}
/* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */
img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
}
/* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */
.no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,
[data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"],
.ace_editor, .ace_editor *,
.CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,
.monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,
.markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,
.highlight, .highlight *,
pre code, pre code * {
filter: none !important;
}
/* Fix common UI elements */
.modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
background: #2d2d44 !important;
border-color: #444 !important;
}
/* Scrollbars */
::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }
::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }
::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }
/* Selection */
::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }
::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }
';
}
function removeDarkMode() {
var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');
if (style) style.remove();
}
// Toggle with Alt+Shift+D
document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {
if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {
e.preventDefault();
enabled = !enabled;
if (enabled) {
applyDarkMode();
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');
} else {
removeDarkMode();
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');
}
}
});
// Apply on load
applyDarkMode();
// Re-apply on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {
applyDarkMode();
}
});
observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

Skip to content
Add compliance context to transactions#823

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

 Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and
privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?
Sign in
to your account

 Merged

jklein24
merged 1 commit into

from

Aug 14, 2026
 Merged


Add compliance context to transactions
#823
Show file tree
Hide file tree
 Changes from all commits
Commits

Show all changes


1 commit


Select commit


File filter

Filter by extension
Filter by extension
Conversations

Failed to load comments. 
Loading
Jump to

Jump to file


Failed to load files. 
Loading
 Diff view

 Diff view


22 changes: 21 additions & 1 deletion
mintlify/openapi.yaml

View file


Open in desktop


Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.


22 changes: 21 additions & 1 deletion
openapi.yaml

View file


Open in desktop


Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.


6 changes: 4 additions & 2 deletions
openapi/components/schemas/transactions/IncomingTransactionFailureReason.yaml

View file


Open in desktop

Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -8,7 +8,9 @@ enum:
 - MISSING_MANDATORY_PAYEE_DATA
 - QUOTE_EXPIRED
 - QUOTE_EXECUTION_FAILED
 - COMPLIANCE_REJECTED
@shreyavshreyavAug 13, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i think jason just added this so might need a rebase, rest lgtm
@ls-boltls-boltBotAug 13, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rebased onto current main with #689 included and reconciled the overlap. #823 now preserves #689’s complete outgoing failure-reason contract and only adds the incoming COMPLIANCE_REJECTED value plus shared pending context. make build is reproducible and make lint-openapi reports 0 errors.
@jklein24jklein24Aug 13, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

ContributorAuthor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like he did for Outgoing, but this is Incoming.
@ls-boltls-boltBotAug 13, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Correct — #689 owns the outgoing contract, while this PR still needs COMPLIANCE_REJECTED on incoming deposits. The rebased diff now reflects exactly that split.
@ls-boltls-boltBotAug 13, 2026

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Contributor
Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rebased and resolved — the current diff now preserves #689’s complete outgoing contract and keeps only the incoming compliance rejection plus shared pending context from this PR.
description: >-
 Reason for failure of an incoming transaction. This is used to provide more
 context on why a transaction failed. If the transaction is not in a failed
 state, this field is omitted.
 context on why a transaction failed. COMPLIANCE_REJECTED means compliance
 blocked the incoming funds. If the transaction is not in a failed state,
 this field is omitted.

5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions
openapi/components/schemas/transactions/Transaction.yaml

View file


Open in desktop

Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -14,6 +14,11 @@ properties:
 example: Transaction:019542f5-b3e7-1d02-0000-000000000004
 status:
 $ref: ./TransactionStatus.yaml
 pendingReason:
 $ref: ./TransactionPendingReason.yaml
 description: >-
 Present when compliance review or required customer action is delaying
 settlement.
 type:
 $ref: ./TransactionType.yaml
 direction:
Expand Down

15 changes: 15 additions & 0 deletions
openapi/components/schemas/transactions/TransactionPendingReason.yaml

View file


Open in desktop

Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
type: string
enum:
 - COUNTERPARTY_DECLARATION_REQUIRED
 - WALLET_VERIFICATION_REQUIRED
 - COUNTERPARTY_INFORMATION_REQUIRED
 - COMPLIANCE_REVIEW
description: |
 Why a transaction is pending.

 | Reason | Description |
 |--------|-------------|
 | `COUNTERPARTY_DECLARATION_REQUIRED` | The customer must declare who controls the sending wallet. |
 | `WALLET_VERIFICATION_REQUIRED` | The customer must verify ownership of the sending wallet. |
 | `COUNTERPARTY_INFORMATION_REQUIRED` | Information about the sender is required. |
 | `COMPLIANCE_REVIEW` | The customer's action is complete and the deposit remains under compliance review. |
Loading