Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Revert removal of nonInferrableAnyType - #50691
Conversation
Jake Bailey (jakebailey)
commented
Sep 8, 2022
TypeScript Bot (@typescript-bot) test this |
Heya Jake Bailey (@jakebailey), I've started to run the diff-based user code test suite on this PR at cafebee. You can monitor the build here. Update: The results are in! |
Heya Jake Bailey (@jakebailey), I've started to run the diff-based user code test suite on this PR at cafebee. You can monitor the build here. Update: The results are in! |
Heya Jake Bailey (@jakebailey), I've started to run the abridged perf test suite on this PR at cafebee. You can monitor the build here. Update: The results are in! |
Heya Jake Bailey (@jakebailey), I've started to run the extended test suite on this PR at cafebee. You can monitor the build here. |
Heya Jake Bailey (@jakebailey), I've started to run the parallelized Definitely Typed test suite on this PR at cafebee. You can monitor the build here. |
TypeScript Bot (typescript-bot)
commented
Sep 8, 2022
Jake Bailey (@jakebailey) Here they are:Comparison Report - main..50691
System
Hosts
Scenarios
Developer Information: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TypeScript Bot (typescript-bot)
commented
Sep 8, 2022
Jake Bailey (@jakebailey) Here are the results of running the user test suite comparing Everything looks good! |
TypeScript Bot (typescript-bot)
commented
Sep 8, 2022
Jake Bailey (@jakebailey) Here are the results of running the top-repos suite comparing Everything looks good! |
Jake Bailey (jakebailey)
commented
Sep 9, 2022
TypeScript Bot (@typescript-bot) pack this |
Heya Jake Bailey (@jakebailey), I've started to run the tarball bundle task on this PR at cafebee. You can monitor the build here. |
Hey Jake Bailey (@jakebailey), I've packed this into an installable tgz. You can install it for testing by referencing it in your and then running There is also a playground for this build and an npm module you can use via |
Jake Bailey (jakebailey)
commented
Sep 12, 2022
TypeScript Bot (@typescript-bot) cherry-pick this to release-4.8 |
Heya Jake Bailey (@jakebailey), I've started to run the task to cherry-pick this into |
TypeScript Bot (typescript-bot)
commented
Sep 12, 2022
Hey Jake Bailey (@jakebailey), I've opened #50743 for you. |
Fixes#50680
This reverts a cleanup I made in #49887; apparently, it did matter, but we didn't have a test case to show so.
The type name is probably bad at this point; it's a special any that we only use for this purpose. It would seem like
anyWideningTypeis the right name for it (mirroring the two others with this flag), but confusingly, removing theContainsWideningTypeflag still passes the tests. Maybe there's another case to come up with? Also,ContainsWideningTypeis documented as only existing on those two other types, and they are conditional onstrictNullChecks, so... huh?Anyway, now the code is as it was before, and it works.
This might be another 4.8 backport candidate.