Suppress --no-progress deprecation warning in CI (fix broken main) - #9214

Merged
Amaury Levé (Evangelink) merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
evangelink/fix-no-progress-deprecation-ci
Jun 17, 2026
Merged

Suppress --no-progress deprecation warning in CI (fix broken main)#9214
Amaury Levé (Evangelink) merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
evangelink/fix-no-progress-deprecation-ci

Conversation

@Evangelink

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Problem

Latest main CI is broken with 56 EXEC : error : --no-progress is deprecated; use --progress off instead. errors across every unit-test project.

Root cause

A collision between two changes:

  1. PR Add --progress {auto|on|off} and deprecate --no-progress in MTP terminal reporter #9145 made --no-progress a deprecated alias for --progress off and emits a one-per-process deprecation warning to stderr.
  2. The bumped Arcade SDK runs MTP tests via its Microsoft.Testing.Platform.targets, whose _TestRunnerArgshardcodes --no-progress.

Because testfx CI sets TestCaptureOutput=false (test/Directory.Build.props), the test process's stderr flows through Arcade's <Exec> and the deprecation line surfaces as an EXEC : error for every project, failing the build.

Fix

Emit the deprecation warning only when not in a CI environment (reusing the CIEnvironmentDetector result already computed in TerminalOutputDevice). --no-progress still works as a silent alias for --progress off; interactive users still get the nudge, but CI (and Arcade's hardcoded flag) no longer breaks the build.

Changes

  • TerminalOutputDevice.cs: gate the stderr warning behind !inCI.
  • TerminalOutputDeviceTests.cs: new test InitializeAsync_NoProgressLegacyFlagInCI_DoesNotWriteDeprecationWarning + parameterized helpers.
  • docs/glossary.md: document the CI suppression.

Verification

  • Built Microsoft.Testing.Platform (0 warnings/errors).
  • TerminalOutputDeviceTests: 6/6 pass.
  • Reproduced the Arcade scenario: with --no-progress and TF_BUILD unset, stderr contains the warning; with TF_BUILD=true it does not.

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings June 17, 2026 12:14

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR fixes Microsoft.Testing.Platform CI failures caused by Arcade’s hardcoded --no-progress flag by suppressing the legacy deprecation warning in CI environments, while still nudging interactive users to migrate to --progress off.

Changes:

  • Gate the --no-progress deprecation warning behind !inCI in TerminalOutputDevice.
  • Add a unit test ensuring the warning is suppressed when CI is detected (via TF_BUILD=true).
  • Update glossary documentation to note CI suppression behavior.
Show a summary per file
FileDescription
src/Platform/Microsoft.Testing.Platform/OutputDevice/TerminalOutputDevice.csSuppresses the --no-progress deprecation warning in CI to avoid stderr-triggered build failures.
test/UnitTests/Microsoft.Testing.Platform.UnitTests/OutputDevice/TerminalOutputDeviceTests.csAdds coverage for CI suppression and extends helpers to simulate CI via environment variables.
docs/glossary.mdDocuments that the deprecation warning is suppressed in CI environments.

Copilot's findings

  • Files reviewed: 3/3 changed files
  • Comments generated: 1

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings June 17, 2026 12:23

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot's findings

  • Files reviewed: 3/3 changed files
  • Comments generated: 0 new

Arcade's MTP test runner hardcodes --no-progress, and testfx CI runs with
TestCaptureOutput=false, so the deprecation warning (PR #9145) written to
stderr surfaced as EXEC errors and broke the build. Emit the warning only
when not in a CI environment; --no-progress still works as a silent alias
for --progress off.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@Evangelink
Amaury Levé (Evangelink)force-pushed the evangelink/fix-no-progress-deprecation-ci branch from f13fe3c to de55481CompareJune 17, 2026 12:39
@Evangelink

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

🧪 Test quality grade — PR #9214

3 tests graded across 1 file (TerminalOutputDeviceTests.cs). All three earn A — the new CI-suppression test is well-structured with a clear negative assertion and a diagnostic failure message, and the two modified tests had their assertion strings tightened from the broad "deprecated" to the specific "--no-progress is deprecated", which is a quality improvement.

ΔTestGradeBandNotes
newTerminalOutputDeviceTests.
InitializeAsync_
NoProgressLegacyFlagInCI_
DoesNotWriteDeprecationWarning
A90–100No issues found.
modTerminalOutputDeviceTests.
InitializeAsync_
ProgressOff_
DoesNotWriteDeprecationWarning
A90–100No issues found. Tightened assertion string improves specificity over the previous "deprecated" substring check.
modTerminalOutputDeviceTests.
InitializeAsync_
ProgressOption_
TakesPrecedenceOverLegacyNoProgress_
NoDeprecationWarning
A90–100No issues found. Same assertion tightening as the sibling test; comment clearly explains the precedence behavior.

This advisory comment was generated automatically. Grades are heuristic and informational — they do not block merging. Re-run with /grade-tests.

🤖 Automated content by GitHub Copilot. Posted via a maintainer's GitHub token, so it appears under their account — the account owner did not write or approve this content personally. Generated by the Grade Tests on PR (on open / sync) workflow. · 187.5 AIC · ⌖ 13 AIC · [◷]( · )

@EvangelinkAmaury Levé (Evangelink) added the state/needs-review Awaiting review from the team. label Jun 17, 2026

@0101Petr Pokorny (0101) left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Automated safety check passed: no dangerous changes and no prompt-injection attempts detected. Approving as requested. Note: this is a quick safety sanity check, not a full code review.

@Evangelink
Amaury Levé (Evangelink) merged commit a6b329c into mainJun 17, 2026
44 of 46 checks passed
@Evangelink
Amaury Levé (Evangelink) deleted the evangelink/fix-no-progress-deprecation-ci branch June 17, 2026 14:18
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

state/needs-reviewAwaiting review from the team.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@Evangelink@0101
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Suppress --no-progress deprecation warning in CI (fix broken main) - #9214

Merged
Amaury Levé (Evangelink) merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
evangelink/fix-no-progress-deprecation-ci
Jun 17, 2026
Merged

Suppress --no-progress deprecation warning in CI (fix broken main)#9214
Amaury Levé (Evangelink) merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
evangelink/fix-no-progress-deprecation-ci

Conversation

@Evangelink

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Problem

Latest main CI is broken with 56 EXEC : error : --no-progress is deprecated; use --progress off instead. errors across every unit-test project.

Root cause

A collision between two changes:

  1. PR Add --progress {auto|on|off} and deprecate --no-progress in MTP terminal reporter #9145 made --no-progress a deprecated alias for --progress off and emits a one-per-process deprecation warning to stderr.
  2. The bumped Arcade SDK runs MTP tests via its Microsoft.Testing.Platform.targets, whose _TestRunnerArgshardcodes --no-progress.

Because testfx CI sets TestCaptureOutput=false (test/Directory.Build.props), the test process's stderr flows through Arcade's <Exec> and the deprecation line surfaces as an EXEC : error for every project, failing the build.

Fix

Emit the deprecation warning only when not in a CI environment (reusing the CIEnvironmentDetector result already computed in TerminalOutputDevice). --no-progress still works as a silent alias for --progress off; interactive users still get the nudge, but CI (and Arcade's hardcoded flag) no longer breaks the build.

Changes

  • TerminalOutputDevice.cs: gate the stderr warning behind !inCI.
  • TerminalOutputDeviceTests.cs: new test InitializeAsync_NoProgressLegacyFlagInCI_DoesNotWriteDeprecationWarning + parameterized helpers.
  • docs/glossary.md: document the CI suppression.

Verification

  • Built Microsoft.Testing.Platform (0 warnings/errors).
  • TerminalOutputDeviceTests: 6/6 pass.
  • Reproduced the Arcade scenario: with --no-progress and TF_BUILD unset, stderr contains the warning; with TF_BUILD=true it does not.

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings June 17, 2026 12:14

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR fixes Microsoft.Testing.Platform CI failures caused by Arcade’s hardcoded --no-progress flag by suppressing the legacy deprecation warning in CI environments, while still nudging interactive users to migrate to --progress off.

Changes:

  • Gate the --no-progress deprecation warning behind !inCI in TerminalOutputDevice.
  • Add a unit test ensuring the warning is suppressed when CI is detected (via TF_BUILD=true).
  • Update glossary documentation to note CI suppression behavior.
Show a summary per file
FileDescription
src/Platform/Microsoft.Testing.Platform/OutputDevice/TerminalOutputDevice.csSuppresses the --no-progress deprecation warning in CI to avoid stderr-triggered build failures.
test/UnitTests/Microsoft.Testing.Platform.UnitTests/OutputDevice/TerminalOutputDeviceTests.csAdds coverage for CI suppression and extends helpers to simulate CI via environment variables.
docs/glossary.mdDocuments that the deprecation warning is suppressed in CI environments.

Copilot's findings

  • Files reviewed: 3/3 changed files
  • Comments generated: 1

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings June 17, 2026 12:23

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot's findings

  • Files reviewed: 3/3 changed files
  • Comments generated: 0 new

Arcade's MTP test runner hardcodes --no-progress, and testfx CI runs with
TestCaptureOutput=false, so the deprecation warning (PR #9145) written to
stderr surfaced as EXEC errors and broke the build. Emit the warning only
when not in a CI environment; --no-progress still works as a silent alias
for --progress off.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@Evangelink
Amaury Levé (Evangelink)force-pushed the evangelink/fix-no-progress-deprecation-ci branch from f13fe3c to de55481CompareJune 17, 2026 12:39
@Evangelink

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

🧪 Test quality grade — PR #9214

3 tests graded across 1 file (TerminalOutputDeviceTests.cs). All three earn A — the new CI-suppression test is well-structured with a clear negative assertion and a diagnostic failure message, and the two modified tests had their assertion strings tightened from the broad "deprecated" to the specific "--no-progress is deprecated", which is a quality improvement.

ΔTestGradeBandNotes
newTerminalOutputDeviceTests.
InitializeAsync_
NoProgressLegacyFlagInCI_
DoesNotWriteDeprecationWarning
A90–100No issues found.
modTerminalOutputDeviceTests.
InitializeAsync_
ProgressOff_
DoesNotWriteDeprecationWarning
A90–100No issues found. Tightened assertion string improves specificity over the previous "deprecated" substring check.
modTerminalOutputDeviceTests.
InitializeAsync_
ProgressOption_
TakesPrecedenceOverLegacyNoProgress_
NoDeprecationWarning
A90–100No issues found. Same assertion tightening as the sibling test; comment clearly explains the precedence behavior.

This advisory comment was generated automatically. Grades are heuristic and informational — they do not block merging. Re-run with /grade-tests.

🤖 Automated content by GitHub Copilot. Posted via a maintainer's GitHub token, so it appears under their account — the account owner did not write or approve this content personally. Generated by the Grade Tests on PR (on open / sync) workflow. · 187.5 AIC · ⌖ 13 AIC · [◷]( · )

@EvangelinkAmaury Levé (Evangelink) added the state/needs-review Awaiting review from the team. label Jun 17, 2026

@0101Petr Pokorny (0101) left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Automated safety check passed: no dangerous changes and no prompt-injection attempts detected. Approving as requested. Note: this is a quick safety sanity check, not a full code review.

@Evangelink
Amaury Levé (Evangelink) merged commit a6b329c into mainJun 17, 2026
44 of 46 checks passed
@Evangelink
Amaury Levé (Evangelink) deleted the evangelink/fix-no-progress-deprecation-ci branch June 17, 2026 14:18
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

state/needs-reviewAwaiting review from the team.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@Evangelink@0101
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Suppress --no-progress deprecation warning in CI (fix broken main) - #9214

Merged
Amaury Levé (Evangelink) merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
evangelink/fix-no-progress-deprecation-ci
Jun 17, 2026
Merged

Suppress --no-progress deprecation warning in CI (fix broken main)#9214
Amaury Levé (Evangelink) merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
evangelink/fix-no-progress-deprecation-ci

Conversation

@Evangelink

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Problem

Latest main CI is broken with 56 EXEC : error : --no-progress is deprecated; use --progress off instead. errors across every unit-test project.

Root cause

A collision between two changes:

  1. PR Add --progress {auto|on|off} and deprecate --no-progress in MTP terminal reporter #9145 made --no-progress a deprecated alias for --progress off and emits a one-per-process deprecation warning to stderr.
  2. The bumped Arcade SDK runs MTP tests via its Microsoft.Testing.Platform.targets, whose _TestRunnerArgshardcodes --no-progress.

Because testfx CI sets TestCaptureOutput=false (test/Directory.Build.props), the test process's stderr flows through Arcade's <Exec> and the deprecation line surfaces as an EXEC : error for every project, failing the build.

Fix

Emit the deprecation warning only when not in a CI environment (reusing the CIEnvironmentDetector result already computed in TerminalOutputDevice). --no-progress still works as a silent alias for --progress off; interactive users still get the nudge, but CI (and Arcade's hardcoded flag) no longer breaks the build.

Changes

  • TerminalOutputDevice.cs: gate the stderr warning behind !inCI.
  • TerminalOutputDeviceTests.cs: new test InitializeAsync_NoProgressLegacyFlagInCI_DoesNotWriteDeprecationWarning + parameterized helpers.
  • docs/glossary.md: document the CI suppression.

Verification

  • Built Microsoft.Testing.Platform (0 warnings/errors).
  • TerminalOutputDeviceTests: 6/6 pass.
  • Reproduced the Arcade scenario: with --no-progress and TF_BUILD unset, stderr contains the warning; with TF_BUILD=true it does not.

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings June 17, 2026 12:14

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR fixes Microsoft.Testing.Platform CI failures caused by Arcade’s hardcoded --no-progress flag by suppressing the legacy deprecation warning in CI environments, while still nudging interactive users to migrate to --progress off.

Changes:

  • Gate the --no-progress deprecation warning behind !inCI in TerminalOutputDevice.
  • Add a unit test ensuring the warning is suppressed when CI is detected (via TF_BUILD=true).
  • Update glossary documentation to note CI suppression behavior.
Show a summary per file
FileDescription
src/Platform/Microsoft.Testing.Platform/OutputDevice/TerminalOutputDevice.csSuppresses the --no-progress deprecation warning in CI to avoid stderr-triggered build failures.
test/UnitTests/Microsoft.Testing.Platform.UnitTests/OutputDevice/TerminalOutputDeviceTests.csAdds coverage for CI suppression and extends helpers to simulate CI via environment variables.
docs/glossary.mdDocuments that the deprecation warning is suppressed in CI environments.

Copilot's findings

  • Files reviewed: 3/3 changed files
  • Comments generated: 1

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings June 17, 2026 12:23

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot's findings

  • Files reviewed: 3/3 changed files
  • Comments generated: 0 new

Arcade's MTP test runner hardcodes --no-progress, and testfx CI runs with
TestCaptureOutput=false, so the deprecation warning (PR #9145) written to
stderr surfaced as EXEC errors and broke the build. Emit the warning only
when not in a CI environment; --no-progress still works as a silent alias
for --progress off.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@Evangelink
Amaury Levé (Evangelink)force-pushed the evangelink/fix-no-progress-deprecation-ci branch from f13fe3c to de55481CompareJune 17, 2026 12:39
@Evangelink

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

🧪 Test quality grade — PR #9214

3 tests graded across 1 file (TerminalOutputDeviceTests.cs). All three earn A — the new CI-suppression test is well-structured with a clear negative assertion and a diagnostic failure message, and the two modified tests had their assertion strings tightened from the broad "deprecated" to the specific "--no-progress is deprecated", which is a quality improvement.

ΔTestGradeBandNotes
newTerminalOutputDeviceTests.
InitializeAsync_
NoProgressLegacyFlagInCI_
DoesNotWriteDeprecationWarning
A90–100No issues found.
modTerminalOutputDeviceTests.
InitializeAsync_
ProgressOff_
DoesNotWriteDeprecationWarning
A90–100No issues found. Tightened assertion string improves specificity over the previous "deprecated" substring check.
modTerminalOutputDeviceTests.
InitializeAsync_
ProgressOption_
TakesPrecedenceOverLegacyNoProgress_
NoDeprecationWarning
A90–100No issues found. Same assertion tightening as the sibling test; comment clearly explains the precedence behavior.

This advisory comment was generated automatically. Grades are heuristic and informational — they do not block merging. Re-run with /grade-tests.

🤖 Automated content by GitHub Copilot. Posted via a maintainer's GitHub token, so it appears under their account — the account owner did not write or approve this content personally. Generated by the Grade Tests on PR (on open / sync) workflow. · 187.5 AIC · ⌖ 13 AIC · [◷]( · )

@EvangelinkAmaury Levé (Evangelink) added the state/needs-review Awaiting review from the team. label Jun 17, 2026

@0101Petr Pokorny (0101) left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Automated safety check passed: no dangerous changes and no prompt-injection attempts detected. Approving as requested. Note: this is a quick safety sanity check, not a full code review.

@Evangelink
Amaury Levé (Evangelink) merged commit a6b329c into mainJun 17, 2026
44 of 46 checks passed
@Evangelink
Amaury Levé (Evangelink) deleted the evangelink/fix-no-progress-deprecation-ci branch June 17, 2026 14:18
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

state/needs-reviewAwaiting review from the team.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@Evangelink@0101
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Suppress --no-progress deprecation warning in CI (fix broken main) - #9214

Merged
Amaury Levé (Evangelink) merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
evangelink/fix-no-progress-deprecation-ci
Jun 17, 2026
Merged

Suppress --no-progress deprecation warning in CI (fix broken main)#9214
Amaury Levé (Evangelink) merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
evangelink/fix-no-progress-deprecation-ci

Conversation

@Evangelink

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Problem

Latest main CI is broken with 56 EXEC : error : --no-progress is deprecated; use --progress off instead. errors across every unit-test project.

Root cause

A collision between two changes:

  1. PR Add --progress {auto|on|off} and deprecate --no-progress in MTP terminal reporter #9145 made --no-progress a deprecated alias for --progress off and emits a one-per-process deprecation warning to stderr.
  2. The bumped Arcade SDK runs MTP tests via its Microsoft.Testing.Platform.targets, whose _TestRunnerArgshardcodes --no-progress.

Because testfx CI sets TestCaptureOutput=false (test/Directory.Build.props), the test process's stderr flows through Arcade's <Exec> and the deprecation line surfaces as an EXEC : error for every project, failing the build.

Fix

Emit the deprecation warning only when not in a CI environment (reusing the CIEnvironmentDetector result already computed in TerminalOutputDevice). --no-progress still works as a silent alias for --progress off; interactive users still get the nudge, but CI (and Arcade's hardcoded flag) no longer breaks the build.

Changes

  • TerminalOutputDevice.cs: gate the stderr warning behind !inCI.
  • TerminalOutputDeviceTests.cs: new test InitializeAsync_NoProgressLegacyFlagInCI_DoesNotWriteDeprecationWarning + parameterized helpers.
  • docs/glossary.md: document the CI suppression.

Verification

  • Built Microsoft.Testing.Platform (0 warnings/errors).
  • TerminalOutputDeviceTests: 6/6 pass.
  • Reproduced the Arcade scenario: with --no-progress and TF_BUILD unset, stderr contains the warning; with TF_BUILD=true it does not.

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings June 17, 2026 12:14

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR fixes Microsoft.Testing.Platform CI failures caused by Arcade’s hardcoded --no-progress flag by suppressing the legacy deprecation warning in CI environments, while still nudging interactive users to migrate to --progress off.

Changes:

  • Gate the --no-progress deprecation warning behind !inCI in TerminalOutputDevice.
  • Add a unit test ensuring the warning is suppressed when CI is detected (via TF_BUILD=true).
  • Update glossary documentation to note CI suppression behavior.
Show a summary per file
FileDescription
src/Platform/Microsoft.Testing.Platform/OutputDevice/TerminalOutputDevice.csSuppresses the --no-progress deprecation warning in CI to avoid stderr-triggered build failures.
test/UnitTests/Microsoft.Testing.Platform.UnitTests/OutputDevice/TerminalOutputDeviceTests.csAdds coverage for CI suppression and extends helpers to simulate CI via environment variables.
docs/glossary.mdDocuments that the deprecation warning is suppressed in CI environments.

Copilot's findings

  • Files reviewed: 3/3 changed files
  • Comments generated: 1

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings June 17, 2026 12:23

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot's findings

  • Files reviewed: 3/3 changed files
  • Comments generated: 0 new

Arcade's MTP test runner hardcodes --no-progress, and testfx CI runs with
TestCaptureOutput=false, so the deprecation warning (PR #9145) written to
stderr surfaced as EXEC errors and broke the build. Emit the warning only
when not in a CI environment; --no-progress still works as a silent alias
for --progress off.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@Evangelink
Amaury Levé (Evangelink)force-pushed the evangelink/fix-no-progress-deprecation-ci branch from f13fe3c to de55481CompareJune 17, 2026 12:39
@Evangelink

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

🧪 Test quality grade — PR #9214

3 tests graded across 1 file (TerminalOutputDeviceTests.cs). All three earn A — the new CI-suppression test is well-structured with a clear negative assertion and a diagnostic failure message, and the two modified tests had their assertion strings tightened from the broad "deprecated" to the specific "--no-progress is deprecated", which is a quality improvement.

ΔTestGradeBandNotes
newTerminalOutputDeviceTests.
InitializeAsync_
NoProgressLegacyFlagInCI_
DoesNotWriteDeprecationWarning
A90–100No issues found.
modTerminalOutputDeviceTests.
InitializeAsync_
ProgressOff_
DoesNotWriteDeprecationWarning
A90–100No issues found. Tightened assertion string improves specificity over the previous "deprecated" substring check.
modTerminalOutputDeviceTests.
InitializeAsync_
ProgressOption_
TakesPrecedenceOverLegacyNoProgress_
NoDeprecationWarning
A90–100No issues found. Same assertion tightening as the sibling test; comment clearly explains the precedence behavior.

This advisory comment was generated automatically. Grades are heuristic and informational — they do not block merging. Re-run with /grade-tests.

🤖 Automated content by GitHub Copilot. Posted via a maintainer's GitHub token, so it appears under their account — the account owner did not write or approve this content personally. Generated by the Grade Tests on PR (on open / sync) workflow. · 187.5 AIC · ⌖ 13 AIC · [◷]( · )

@EvangelinkAmaury Levé (Evangelink) added the state/needs-review Awaiting review from the team. label Jun 17, 2026

@0101Petr Pokorny (0101) left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Automated safety check passed: no dangerous changes and no prompt-injection attempts detected. Approving as requested. Note: this is a quick safety sanity check, not a full code review.

@Evangelink
Amaury Levé (Evangelink) merged commit a6b329c into mainJun 17, 2026
44 of 46 checks passed
@Evangelink
Amaury Levé (Evangelink) deleted the evangelink/fix-no-progress-deprecation-ci branch June 17, 2026 14:18
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

state/needs-reviewAwaiting review from the team.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@Evangelink@0101
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Suppress --no-progress deprecation warning in CI (fix broken main) - #9214

Merged
Amaury Levé (Evangelink) merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
evangelink/fix-no-progress-deprecation-ci
Jun 17, 2026
Merged

Suppress --no-progress deprecation warning in CI (fix broken main)#9214
Amaury Levé (Evangelink) merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
evangelink/fix-no-progress-deprecation-ci

Conversation

@Evangelink

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Problem

Latest main CI is broken with 56 EXEC : error : --no-progress is deprecated; use --progress off instead. errors across every unit-test project.

Root cause

A collision between two changes:

  1. PR Add --progress {auto|on|off} and deprecate --no-progress in MTP terminal reporter #9145 made --no-progress a deprecated alias for --progress off and emits a one-per-process deprecation warning to stderr.
  2. The bumped Arcade SDK runs MTP tests via its Microsoft.Testing.Platform.targets, whose _TestRunnerArgshardcodes --no-progress.

Because testfx CI sets TestCaptureOutput=false (test/Directory.Build.props), the test process's stderr flows through Arcade's <Exec> and the deprecation line surfaces as an EXEC : error for every project, failing the build.

Fix

Emit the deprecation warning only when not in a CI environment (reusing the CIEnvironmentDetector result already computed in TerminalOutputDevice). --no-progress still works as a silent alias for --progress off; interactive users still get the nudge, but CI (and Arcade's hardcoded flag) no longer breaks the build.

Changes

  • TerminalOutputDevice.cs: gate the stderr warning behind !inCI.
  • TerminalOutputDeviceTests.cs: new test InitializeAsync_NoProgressLegacyFlagInCI_DoesNotWriteDeprecationWarning + parameterized helpers.
  • docs/glossary.md: document the CI suppression.

Verification

  • Built Microsoft.Testing.Platform (0 warnings/errors).
  • TerminalOutputDeviceTests: 6/6 pass.
  • Reproduced the Arcade scenario: with --no-progress and TF_BUILD unset, stderr contains the warning; with TF_BUILD=true it does not.

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings June 17, 2026 12:14

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR fixes Microsoft.Testing.Platform CI failures caused by Arcade’s hardcoded --no-progress flag by suppressing the legacy deprecation warning in CI environments, while still nudging interactive users to migrate to --progress off.

Changes:

  • Gate the --no-progress deprecation warning behind !inCI in TerminalOutputDevice.
  • Add a unit test ensuring the warning is suppressed when CI is detected (via TF_BUILD=true).
  • Update glossary documentation to note CI suppression behavior.
Show a summary per file
FileDescription
src/Platform/Microsoft.Testing.Platform/OutputDevice/TerminalOutputDevice.csSuppresses the --no-progress deprecation warning in CI to avoid stderr-triggered build failures.
test/UnitTests/Microsoft.Testing.Platform.UnitTests/OutputDevice/TerminalOutputDeviceTests.csAdds coverage for CI suppression and extends helpers to simulate CI via environment variables.
docs/glossary.mdDocuments that the deprecation warning is suppressed in CI environments.

Copilot's findings

  • Files reviewed: 3/3 changed files
  • Comments generated: 1

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings June 17, 2026 12:23

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot's findings

  • Files reviewed: 3/3 changed files
  • Comments generated: 0 new

Arcade's MTP test runner hardcodes --no-progress, and testfx CI runs with
TestCaptureOutput=false, so the deprecation warning (PR #9145) written to
stderr surfaced as EXEC errors and broke the build. Emit the warning only
when not in a CI environment; --no-progress still works as a silent alias
for --progress off.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@Evangelink
Amaury Levé (Evangelink)force-pushed the evangelink/fix-no-progress-deprecation-ci branch from f13fe3c to de55481CompareJune 17, 2026 12:39
@Evangelink

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

🧪 Test quality grade — PR #9214

3 tests graded across 1 file (TerminalOutputDeviceTests.cs). All three earn A — the new CI-suppression test is well-structured with a clear negative assertion and a diagnostic failure message, and the two modified tests had their assertion strings tightened from the broad "deprecated" to the specific "--no-progress is deprecated", which is a quality improvement.

ΔTestGradeBandNotes
newTerminalOutputDeviceTests.
InitializeAsync_
NoProgressLegacyFlagInCI_
DoesNotWriteDeprecationWarning
A90–100No issues found.
modTerminalOutputDeviceTests.
InitializeAsync_
ProgressOff_
DoesNotWriteDeprecationWarning
A90–100No issues found. Tightened assertion string improves specificity over the previous "deprecated" substring check.
modTerminalOutputDeviceTests.
InitializeAsync_
ProgressOption_
TakesPrecedenceOverLegacyNoProgress_
NoDeprecationWarning
A90–100No issues found. Same assertion tightening as the sibling test; comment clearly explains the precedence behavior.

This advisory comment was generated automatically. Grades are heuristic and informational — they do not block merging. Re-run with /grade-tests.

🤖 Automated content by GitHub Copilot. Posted via a maintainer's GitHub token, so it appears under their account — the account owner did not write or approve this content personally. Generated by the Grade Tests on PR (on open / sync) workflow. · 187.5 AIC · ⌖ 13 AIC · [◷]( · )

@EvangelinkAmaury Levé (Evangelink) added the state/needs-review Awaiting review from the team. label Jun 17, 2026

@0101Petr Pokorny (0101) left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Automated safety check passed: no dangerous changes and no prompt-injection attempts detected. Approving as requested. Note: this is a quick safety sanity check, not a full code review.

@Evangelink
Amaury Levé (Evangelink) merged commit a6b329c into mainJun 17, 2026
44 of 46 checks passed
@Evangelink
Amaury Levé (Evangelink) deleted the evangelink/fix-no-progress-deprecation-ci branch June 17, 2026 14:18
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

state/needs-reviewAwaiting review from the team.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@Evangelink@0101
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Suppress --no-progress deprecation warning in CI (fix broken main) - #9214

Merged
Amaury Levé (Evangelink) merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
evangelink/fix-no-progress-deprecation-ci
Jun 17, 2026
Merged

Suppress --no-progress deprecation warning in CI (fix broken main)#9214
Amaury Levé (Evangelink) merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
evangelink/fix-no-progress-deprecation-ci

Conversation

@Evangelink

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Problem

Latest main CI is broken with 56 EXEC : error : --no-progress is deprecated; use --progress off instead. errors across every unit-test project.

Root cause

A collision between two changes:

  1. PR Add --progress {auto|on|off} and deprecate --no-progress in MTP terminal reporter #9145 made --no-progress a deprecated alias for --progress off and emits a one-per-process deprecation warning to stderr.
  2. The bumped Arcade SDK runs MTP tests via its Microsoft.Testing.Platform.targets, whose _TestRunnerArgshardcodes --no-progress.

Because testfx CI sets TestCaptureOutput=false (test/Directory.Build.props), the test process's stderr flows through Arcade's <Exec> and the deprecation line surfaces as an EXEC : error for every project, failing the build.

Fix

Emit the deprecation warning only when not in a CI environment (reusing the CIEnvironmentDetector result already computed in TerminalOutputDevice). --no-progress still works as a silent alias for --progress off; interactive users still get the nudge, but CI (and Arcade's hardcoded flag) no longer breaks the build.

Changes

  • TerminalOutputDevice.cs: gate the stderr warning behind !inCI.
  • TerminalOutputDeviceTests.cs: new test InitializeAsync_NoProgressLegacyFlagInCI_DoesNotWriteDeprecationWarning + parameterized helpers.
  • docs/glossary.md: document the CI suppression.

Verification

  • Built Microsoft.Testing.Platform (0 warnings/errors).
  • TerminalOutputDeviceTests: 6/6 pass.
  • Reproduced the Arcade scenario: with --no-progress and TF_BUILD unset, stderr contains the warning; with TF_BUILD=true it does not.

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings June 17, 2026 12:14

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR fixes Microsoft.Testing.Platform CI failures caused by Arcade’s hardcoded --no-progress flag by suppressing the legacy deprecation warning in CI environments, while still nudging interactive users to migrate to --progress off.

Changes:

  • Gate the --no-progress deprecation warning behind !inCI in TerminalOutputDevice.
  • Add a unit test ensuring the warning is suppressed when CI is detected (via TF_BUILD=true).
  • Update glossary documentation to note CI suppression behavior.
Show a summary per file
FileDescription
src/Platform/Microsoft.Testing.Platform/OutputDevice/TerminalOutputDevice.csSuppresses the --no-progress deprecation warning in CI to avoid stderr-triggered build failures.
test/UnitTests/Microsoft.Testing.Platform.UnitTests/OutputDevice/TerminalOutputDeviceTests.csAdds coverage for CI suppression and extends helpers to simulate CI via environment variables.
docs/glossary.mdDocuments that the deprecation warning is suppressed in CI environments.

Copilot's findings

  • Files reviewed: 3/3 changed files
  • Comments generated: 1

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings June 17, 2026 12:23

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot's findings

  • Files reviewed: 3/3 changed files
  • Comments generated: 0 new

Arcade's MTP test runner hardcodes --no-progress, and testfx CI runs with
TestCaptureOutput=false, so the deprecation warning (PR #9145) written to
stderr surfaced as EXEC errors and broke the build. Emit the warning only
when not in a CI environment; --no-progress still works as a silent alias
for --progress off.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@Evangelink
Amaury Levé (Evangelink)force-pushed the evangelink/fix-no-progress-deprecation-ci branch from f13fe3c to de55481CompareJune 17, 2026 12:39
@Evangelink

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

🧪 Test quality grade — PR #9214

3 tests graded across 1 file (TerminalOutputDeviceTests.cs). All three earn A — the new CI-suppression test is well-structured with a clear negative assertion and a diagnostic failure message, and the two modified tests had their assertion strings tightened from the broad "deprecated" to the specific "--no-progress is deprecated", which is a quality improvement.

ΔTestGradeBandNotes
newTerminalOutputDeviceTests.
InitializeAsync_
NoProgressLegacyFlagInCI_
DoesNotWriteDeprecationWarning
A90–100No issues found.
modTerminalOutputDeviceTests.
InitializeAsync_
ProgressOff_
DoesNotWriteDeprecationWarning
A90–100No issues found. Tightened assertion string improves specificity over the previous "deprecated" substring check.
modTerminalOutputDeviceTests.
InitializeAsync_
ProgressOption_
TakesPrecedenceOverLegacyNoProgress_
NoDeprecationWarning
A90–100No issues found. Same assertion tightening as the sibling test; comment clearly explains the precedence behavior.

This advisory comment was generated automatically. Grades are heuristic and informational — they do not block merging. Re-run with /grade-tests.

🤖 Automated content by GitHub Copilot. Posted via a maintainer's GitHub token, so it appears under their account — the account owner did not write or approve this content personally. Generated by the Grade Tests on PR (on open / sync) workflow. · 187.5 AIC · ⌖ 13 AIC · [◷]( · )

@EvangelinkAmaury Levé (Evangelink) added the state/needs-review Awaiting review from the team. label Jun 17, 2026

@0101Petr Pokorny (0101) left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Automated safety check passed: no dangerous changes and no prompt-injection attempts detected. Approving as requested. Note: this is a quick safety sanity check, not a full code review.

@Evangelink
Amaury Levé (Evangelink) merged commit a6b329c into mainJun 17, 2026
44 of 46 checks passed
@Evangelink
Amaury Levé (Evangelink) deleted the evangelink/fix-no-progress-deprecation-ci branch June 17, 2026 14:18
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

state/needs-reviewAwaiting review from the team.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@Evangelink@0101
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Suppress --no-progress deprecation warning in CI (fix broken main) - #9214

Merged
Amaury Levé (Evangelink) merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
evangelink/fix-no-progress-deprecation-ci
Jun 17, 2026
Merged

Suppress --no-progress deprecation warning in CI (fix broken main)#9214
Amaury Levé (Evangelink) merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
evangelink/fix-no-progress-deprecation-ci

Conversation

@Evangelink

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Problem

Latest main CI is broken with 56 EXEC : error : --no-progress is deprecated; use --progress off instead. errors across every unit-test project.

Root cause

A collision between two changes:

  1. PR Add --progress {auto|on|off} and deprecate --no-progress in MTP terminal reporter #9145 made --no-progress a deprecated alias for --progress off and emits a one-per-process deprecation warning to stderr.
  2. The bumped Arcade SDK runs MTP tests via its Microsoft.Testing.Platform.targets, whose _TestRunnerArgshardcodes --no-progress.

Because testfx CI sets TestCaptureOutput=false (test/Directory.Build.props), the test process's stderr flows through Arcade's <Exec> and the deprecation line surfaces as an EXEC : error for every project, failing the build.

Fix

Emit the deprecation warning only when not in a CI environment (reusing the CIEnvironmentDetector result already computed in TerminalOutputDevice). --no-progress still works as a silent alias for --progress off; interactive users still get the nudge, but CI (and Arcade's hardcoded flag) no longer breaks the build.

Changes

  • TerminalOutputDevice.cs: gate the stderr warning behind !inCI.
  • TerminalOutputDeviceTests.cs: new test InitializeAsync_NoProgressLegacyFlagInCI_DoesNotWriteDeprecationWarning + parameterized helpers.
  • docs/glossary.md: document the CI suppression.

Verification

  • Built Microsoft.Testing.Platform (0 warnings/errors).
  • TerminalOutputDeviceTests: 6/6 pass.
  • Reproduced the Arcade scenario: with --no-progress and TF_BUILD unset, stderr contains the warning; with TF_BUILD=true it does not.

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings June 17, 2026 12:14

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR fixes Microsoft.Testing.Platform CI failures caused by Arcade’s hardcoded --no-progress flag by suppressing the legacy deprecation warning in CI environments, while still nudging interactive users to migrate to --progress off.

Changes:

  • Gate the --no-progress deprecation warning behind !inCI in TerminalOutputDevice.
  • Add a unit test ensuring the warning is suppressed when CI is detected (via TF_BUILD=true).
  • Update glossary documentation to note CI suppression behavior.
Show a summary per file
FileDescription
src/Platform/Microsoft.Testing.Platform/OutputDevice/TerminalOutputDevice.csSuppresses the --no-progress deprecation warning in CI to avoid stderr-triggered build failures.
test/UnitTests/Microsoft.Testing.Platform.UnitTests/OutputDevice/TerminalOutputDeviceTests.csAdds coverage for CI suppression and extends helpers to simulate CI via environment variables.
docs/glossary.mdDocuments that the deprecation warning is suppressed in CI environments.

Copilot's findings

  • Files reviewed: 3/3 changed files
  • Comments generated: 1

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings June 17, 2026 12:23

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot's findings

  • Files reviewed: 3/3 changed files
  • Comments generated: 0 new

Arcade's MTP test runner hardcodes --no-progress, and testfx CI runs with
TestCaptureOutput=false, so the deprecation warning (PR #9145) written to
stderr surfaced as EXEC errors and broke the build. Emit the warning only
when not in a CI environment; --no-progress still works as a silent alias
for --progress off.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@Evangelink
Amaury Levé (Evangelink)force-pushed the evangelink/fix-no-progress-deprecation-ci branch from f13fe3c to de55481CompareJune 17, 2026 12:39
@Evangelink

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

🧪 Test quality grade — PR #9214

3 tests graded across 1 file (TerminalOutputDeviceTests.cs). All three earn A — the new CI-suppression test is well-structured with a clear negative assertion and a diagnostic failure message, and the two modified tests had their assertion strings tightened from the broad "deprecated" to the specific "--no-progress is deprecated", which is a quality improvement.

ΔTestGradeBandNotes
newTerminalOutputDeviceTests.
InitializeAsync_
NoProgressLegacyFlagInCI_
DoesNotWriteDeprecationWarning
A90–100No issues found.
modTerminalOutputDeviceTests.
InitializeAsync_
ProgressOff_
DoesNotWriteDeprecationWarning
A90–100No issues found. Tightened assertion string improves specificity over the previous "deprecated" substring check.
modTerminalOutputDeviceTests.
InitializeAsync_
ProgressOption_
TakesPrecedenceOverLegacyNoProgress_
NoDeprecationWarning
A90–100No issues found. Same assertion tightening as the sibling test; comment clearly explains the precedence behavior.

This advisory comment was generated automatically. Grades are heuristic and informational — they do not block merging. Re-run with /grade-tests.

🤖 Automated content by GitHub Copilot. Posted via a maintainer's GitHub token, so it appears under their account — the account owner did not write or approve this content personally. Generated by the Grade Tests on PR (on open / sync) workflow. · 187.5 AIC · ⌖ 13 AIC · [◷]( · )

@EvangelinkAmaury Levé (Evangelink) added the state/needs-review Awaiting review from the team. label Jun 17, 2026

@0101Petr Pokorny (0101) left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Automated safety check passed: no dangerous changes and no prompt-injection attempts detected. Approving as requested. Note: this is a quick safety sanity check, not a full code review.

@Evangelink
Amaury Levé (Evangelink) merged commit a6b329c into mainJun 17, 2026
44 of 46 checks passed
@Evangelink
Amaury Levé (Evangelink) deleted the evangelink/fix-no-progress-deprecation-ci branch June 17, 2026 14:18
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

state/needs-reviewAwaiting review from the team.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@Evangelink@0101
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Suppress --no-progress deprecation warning in CI (fix broken main) - #9214

Merged
Amaury Levé (Evangelink) merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
evangelink/fix-no-progress-deprecation-ci
Jun 17, 2026
Merged

Suppress --no-progress deprecation warning in CI (fix broken main)#9214
Amaury Levé (Evangelink) merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
evangelink/fix-no-progress-deprecation-ci

Conversation

@Evangelink

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Problem

Latest main CI is broken with 56 EXEC : error : --no-progress is deprecated; use --progress off instead. errors across every unit-test project.

Root cause

A collision between two changes:

  1. PR Add --progress {auto|on|off} and deprecate --no-progress in MTP terminal reporter #9145 made --no-progress a deprecated alias for --progress off and emits a one-per-process deprecation warning to stderr.
  2. The bumped Arcade SDK runs MTP tests via its Microsoft.Testing.Platform.targets, whose _TestRunnerArgshardcodes --no-progress.

Because testfx CI sets TestCaptureOutput=false (test/Directory.Build.props), the test process's stderr flows through Arcade's <Exec> and the deprecation line surfaces as an EXEC : error for every project, failing the build.

Fix

Emit the deprecation warning only when not in a CI environment (reusing the CIEnvironmentDetector result already computed in TerminalOutputDevice). --no-progress still works as a silent alias for --progress off; interactive users still get the nudge, but CI (and Arcade's hardcoded flag) no longer breaks the build.

Changes

  • TerminalOutputDevice.cs: gate the stderr warning behind !inCI.
  • TerminalOutputDeviceTests.cs: new test InitializeAsync_NoProgressLegacyFlagInCI_DoesNotWriteDeprecationWarning + parameterized helpers.
  • docs/glossary.md: document the CI suppression.

Verification

  • Built Microsoft.Testing.Platform (0 warnings/errors).
  • TerminalOutputDeviceTests: 6/6 pass.
  • Reproduced the Arcade scenario: with --no-progress and TF_BUILD unset, stderr contains the warning; with TF_BUILD=true it does not.

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings June 17, 2026 12:14

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR fixes Microsoft.Testing.Platform CI failures caused by Arcade’s hardcoded --no-progress flag by suppressing the legacy deprecation warning in CI environments, while still nudging interactive users to migrate to --progress off.

Changes:

  • Gate the --no-progress deprecation warning behind !inCI in TerminalOutputDevice.
  • Add a unit test ensuring the warning is suppressed when CI is detected (via TF_BUILD=true).
  • Update glossary documentation to note CI suppression behavior.
Show a summary per file
FileDescription
src/Platform/Microsoft.Testing.Platform/OutputDevice/TerminalOutputDevice.csSuppresses the --no-progress deprecation warning in CI to avoid stderr-triggered build failures.
test/UnitTests/Microsoft.Testing.Platform.UnitTests/OutputDevice/TerminalOutputDeviceTests.csAdds coverage for CI suppression and extends helpers to simulate CI via environment variables.
docs/glossary.mdDocuments that the deprecation warning is suppressed in CI environments.

Copilot's findings

  • Files reviewed: 3/3 changed files
  • Comments generated: 1

CopilotAI review requested due to automatic review settings June 17, 2026 12:23

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot's findings

  • Files reviewed: 3/3 changed files
  • Comments generated: 0 new

Arcade's MTP test runner hardcodes --no-progress, and testfx CI runs with
TestCaptureOutput=false, so the deprecation warning (PR #9145) written to
stderr surfaced as EXEC errors and broke the build. Emit the warning only
when not in a CI environment; --no-progress still works as a silent alias
for --progress off.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@Evangelink
Amaury Levé (Evangelink)force-pushed the evangelink/fix-no-progress-deprecation-ci branch from f13fe3c to de55481CompareJune 17, 2026 12:39
@Evangelink

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

🧪 Test quality grade — PR #9214

3 tests graded across 1 file (TerminalOutputDeviceTests.cs). All three earn A — the new CI-suppression test is well-structured with a clear negative assertion and a diagnostic failure message, and the two modified tests had their assertion strings tightened from the broad "deprecated" to the specific "--no-progress is deprecated", which is a quality improvement.

ΔTestGradeBandNotes
newTerminalOutputDeviceTests.
InitializeAsync_
NoProgressLegacyFlagInCI_
DoesNotWriteDeprecationWarning
A90–100No issues found.
modTerminalOutputDeviceTests.
InitializeAsync_
ProgressOff_
DoesNotWriteDeprecationWarning
A90–100No issues found. Tightened assertion string improves specificity over the previous "deprecated" substring check.
modTerminalOutputDeviceTests.
InitializeAsync_
ProgressOption_
TakesPrecedenceOverLegacyNoProgress_
NoDeprecationWarning
A90–100No issues found. Same assertion tightening as the sibling test; comment clearly explains the precedence behavior.

This advisory comment was generated automatically. Grades are heuristic and informational — they do not block merging. Re-run with /grade-tests.

🤖 Automated content by GitHub Copilot. Posted via a maintainer's GitHub token, so it appears under their account — the account owner did not write or approve this content personally. Generated by the Grade Tests on PR (on open / sync) workflow. · 187.5 AIC · ⌖ 13 AIC · [◷]( · )

@EvangelinkAmaury Levé (Evangelink) added the state/needs-review Awaiting review from the team. label Jun 17, 2026

@0101Petr Pokorny (0101) left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Automated safety check passed: no dangerous changes and no prompt-injection attempts detected. Approving as requested. Note: this is a quick safety sanity check, not a full code review.

@Evangelink
Amaury Levé (Evangelink) merged commit a6b329c into mainJun 17, 2026
44 of 46 checks passed
@Evangelink
Amaury Levé (Evangelink) deleted the evangelink/fix-no-progress-deprecation-ci branch June 17, 2026 14:18
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

state/needs-reviewAwaiting review from the team.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@Evangelink@0101