process-wrap v8.2.1, which uses the TokioCommandWrap struct. However, process-wrap v9.0.0 has renamed this to CommandWrap #578

Description

@Linuxdazhao

Describe the bug

The rmcp crate depends on process-wrap v8.2.1, which uses the TokioCommandWrap struct. However, process-wrap v9.0.0 has
renamed this to CommandWrap. This causes dependency conflicts when users need to use process-wrap v9.0.0 directly in
their projects alongside rmcp.

To Reproduce

  1. Add rmcp v0.11.0 to your Cargo.toml with transport features:
    rmcp = { version = "0.11.0", features = ["client", "transport-child-process"] }
  2. Add process-wrap v9.0.0 directly to use its API:
    process-wrap = { version = "9.0.0", features = ["tokio1"] }
  3. Try to use TokioCommandWrap from process-wrap:
    use process_wrap::tokio::TokioCommandWrap;
  4. Run cargo check

Expected behavior

rmcp should depend on process-wrap v9.0.0 so that:

  • There is only one version of process-wrap in the dependency tree
  • Users can use the current process-wrap API (CommandWrap) without version conflicts
  • Type compatibility is maintained when passing wrapped commands to rmcp's transport layer

Logs

error[E0432]: unresolved import process_wrap::tokio::TokioCommandWrap
--> src/tools/mcp/transport.rs:6:5
|
6 | use process_wrap::tokio::TokioCommandWrap;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^----------------
| | |
| | help: a similar name exists in the module: CommandWrap
| no TokioCommandWrap in tokio

Dependency tree shows two versions:
process-wrap v8.2.1
└── rmcp v0.11.0
└── my-project

process-wrap v9.0.0
└── my-project

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
       blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
      }
      } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
      })();
      (function(){
      try {
      var __m = "github.com";
      var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
      
      Skip to content

      process-wrap v8.2.1, which uses the TokioCommandWrap struct. However, process-wrap v9.0.0 has renamed this to CommandWrap #578

      Description

      @Linuxdazhao

      Describe the bug

      The rmcp crate depends on process-wrap v8.2.1, which uses the TokioCommandWrap struct. However, process-wrap v9.0.0 has
      renamed this to CommandWrap. This causes dependency conflicts when users need to use process-wrap v9.0.0 directly in
      their projects alongside rmcp.

      To Reproduce

      1. Add rmcp v0.11.0 to your Cargo.toml with transport features:
        rmcp = { version = "0.11.0", features = ["client", "transport-child-process"] }
      2. Add process-wrap v9.0.0 directly to use its API:
        process-wrap = { version = "9.0.0", features = ["tokio1"] }
      3. Try to use TokioCommandWrap from process-wrap:
        use process_wrap::tokio::TokioCommandWrap;
      4. Run cargo check

      Expected behavior

      rmcp should depend on process-wrap v9.0.0 so that:

      • There is only one version of process-wrap in the dependency tree
      • Users can use the current process-wrap API (CommandWrap) without version conflicts
      • Type compatibility is maintained when passing wrapped commands to rmcp's transport layer

      Logs

      error[E0432]: unresolved import process_wrap::tokio::TokioCommandWrap
      --> src/tools/mcp/transport.rs:6:5
      |
      6 | use process_wrap::tokio::TokioCommandWrap;
      | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^----------------
      | | |
      | | help: a similar name exists in the module: CommandWrap
      | no TokioCommandWrap in tokio

      Dependency tree shows two versions:
      process-wrap v8.2.1
      └── rmcp v0.11.0
      └── my-project

      process-wrap v9.0.0
      └── my-project

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Assignees

      No one assigned

        Labels

        No labels
        No labels

        Type

        No type

        Projects

        No projects

          Milestone

          No milestone

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
          Skip to content

          process-wrap v8.2.1, which uses the TokioCommandWrap struct. However, process-wrap v9.0.0 has renamed this to CommandWrap #578

          Description

          @Linuxdazhao

          Describe the bug

          The rmcp crate depends on process-wrap v8.2.1, which uses the TokioCommandWrap struct. However, process-wrap v9.0.0 has
          renamed this to CommandWrap. This causes dependency conflicts when users need to use process-wrap v9.0.0 directly in
          their projects alongside rmcp.

          To Reproduce

          1. Add rmcp v0.11.0 to your Cargo.toml with transport features:
            rmcp = { version = "0.11.0", features = ["client", "transport-child-process"] }
          2. Add process-wrap v9.0.0 directly to use its API:
            process-wrap = { version = "9.0.0", features = ["tokio1"] }
          3. Try to use TokioCommandWrap from process-wrap:
            use process_wrap::tokio::TokioCommandWrap;
          4. Run cargo check

          Expected behavior

          rmcp should depend on process-wrap v9.0.0 so that:

          • There is only one version of process-wrap in the dependency tree
          • Users can use the current process-wrap API (CommandWrap) without version conflicts
          • Type compatibility is maintained when passing wrapped commands to rmcp's transport layer

          Logs

          error[E0432]: unresolved import process_wrap::tokio::TokioCommandWrap
          --> src/tools/mcp/transport.rs:6:5
          |
          6 | use process_wrap::tokio::TokioCommandWrap;
          | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^----------------
          | | |
          | | help: a similar name exists in the module: CommandWrap
          | no TokioCommandWrap in tokio

          Dependency tree shows two versions:
          process-wrap v8.2.1
          └── rmcp v0.11.0
          └── my-project

          process-wrap v9.0.0
          └── my-project

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Assignees

          No one assigned

            Labels

            No labels
            No labels

            Type

            No type

            Projects

            No projects

              Milestone

              No milestone

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
              Skip to content

              process-wrap v8.2.1, which uses the TokioCommandWrap struct. However, process-wrap v9.0.0 has renamed this to CommandWrap #578

              Description

              @Linuxdazhao

              Describe the bug

              The rmcp crate depends on process-wrap v8.2.1, which uses the TokioCommandWrap struct. However, process-wrap v9.0.0 has
              renamed this to CommandWrap. This causes dependency conflicts when users need to use process-wrap v9.0.0 directly in
              their projects alongside rmcp.

              To Reproduce

              1. Add rmcp v0.11.0 to your Cargo.toml with transport features:
                rmcp = { version = "0.11.0", features = ["client", "transport-child-process"] }
              2. Add process-wrap v9.0.0 directly to use its API:
                process-wrap = { version = "9.0.0", features = ["tokio1"] }
              3. Try to use TokioCommandWrap from process-wrap:
                use process_wrap::tokio::TokioCommandWrap;
              4. Run cargo check

              Expected behavior

              rmcp should depend on process-wrap v9.0.0 so that:

              • There is only one version of process-wrap in the dependency tree
              • Users can use the current process-wrap API (CommandWrap) without version conflicts
              • Type compatibility is maintained when passing wrapped commands to rmcp's transport layer

              Logs

              error[E0432]: unresolved import process_wrap::tokio::TokioCommandWrap
              --> src/tools/mcp/transport.rs:6:5
              |
              6 | use process_wrap::tokio::TokioCommandWrap;
              | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^----------------
              | | |
              | | help: a similar name exists in the module: CommandWrap
              | no TokioCommandWrap in tokio

              Dependency tree shows two versions:
              process-wrap v8.2.1
              └── rmcp v0.11.0
              └── my-project

              process-wrap v9.0.0
              └── my-project

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Assignees

              No one assigned

                Labels

                No labels
                No labels

                Type

                No type

                Projects

                No projects

                  Milestone

                  No milestone

                  Relationships

                  None yet

                  Development

                  No branches or pull requests

                  Issue actions

                  , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
                  Skip to content

                  process-wrap v8.2.1, which uses the TokioCommandWrap struct. However, process-wrap v9.0.0 has renamed this to CommandWrap #578

                  Description

                  @Linuxdazhao

                  Describe the bug

                  The rmcp crate depends on process-wrap v8.2.1, which uses the TokioCommandWrap struct. However, process-wrap v9.0.0 has
                  renamed this to CommandWrap. This causes dependency conflicts when users need to use process-wrap v9.0.0 directly in
                  their projects alongside rmcp.

                  To Reproduce

                  1. Add rmcp v0.11.0 to your Cargo.toml with transport features:
                    rmcp = { version = "0.11.0", features = ["client", "transport-child-process"] }
                  2. Add process-wrap v9.0.0 directly to use its API:
                    process-wrap = { version = "9.0.0", features = ["tokio1"] }
                  3. Try to use TokioCommandWrap from process-wrap:
                    use process_wrap::tokio::TokioCommandWrap;
                  4. Run cargo check

                  Expected behavior

                  rmcp should depend on process-wrap v9.0.0 so that:

                  • There is only one version of process-wrap in the dependency tree
                  • Users can use the current process-wrap API (CommandWrap) without version conflicts
                  • Type compatibility is maintained when passing wrapped commands to rmcp's transport layer

                  Logs

                  error[E0432]: unresolved import process_wrap::tokio::TokioCommandWrap
                  --> src/tools/mcp/transport.rs:6:5
                  |
                  6 | use process_wrap::tokio::TokioCommandWrap;
                  | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^----------------
                  | | |
                  | | help: a similar name exists in the module: CommandWrap
                  | no TokioCommandWrap in tokio

                  Dependency tree shows two versions:
                  process-wrap v8.2.1
                  └── rmcp v0.11.0
                  └── my-project

                  process-wrap v9.0.0
                  └── my-project

                  Metadata

                  Metadata

                  Assignees

                  No one assigned

                    Labels

                    No labels
                    No labels

                    Type

                    No type

                    Projects

                    No projects

                      Milestone

                      No milestone

                      Relationships

                      None yet

                      Development

                      No branches or pull requests

                      Issue actions

                      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
                      Skip to content

                      process-wrap v8.2.1, which uses the TokioCommandWrap struct. However, process-wrap v9.0.0 has renamed this to CommandWrap #578

                      Description

                      @Linuxdazhao

                      Describe the bug

                      The rmcp crate depends on process-wrap v8.2.1, which uses the TokioCommandWrap struct. However, process-wrap v9.0.0 has
                      renamed this to CommandWrap. This causes dependency conflicts when users need to use process-wrap v9.0.0 directly in
                      their projects alongside rmcp.

                      To Reproduce

                      1. Add rmcp v0.11.0 to your Cargo.toml with transport features:
                        rmcp = { version = "0.11.0", features = ["client", "transport-child-process"] }
                      2. Add process-wrap v9.0.0 directly to use its API:
                        process-wrap = { version = "9.0.0", features = ["tokio1"] }
                      3. Try to use TokioCommandWrap from process-wrap:
                        use process_wrap::tokio::TokioCommandWrap;
                      4. Run cargo check

                      Expected behavior

                      rmcp should depend on process-wrap v9.0.0 so that:

                      • There is only one version of process-wrap in the dependency tree
                      • Users can use the current process-wrap API (CommandWrap) without version conflicts
                      • Type compatibility is maintained when passing wrapped commands to rmcp's transport layer

                      Logs

                      error[E0432]: unresolved import process_wrap::tokio::TokioCommandWrap
                      --> src/tools/mcp/transport.rs:6:5
                      |
                      6 | use process_wrap::tokio::TokioCommandWrap;
                      | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^----------------
                      | | |
                      | | help: a similar name exists in the module: CommandWrap
                      | no TokioCommandWrap in tokio

                      Dependency tree shows two versions:
                      process-wrap v8.2.1
                      └── rmcp v0.11.0
                      └── my-project

                      process-wrap v9.0.0
                      └── my-project

                      Metadata

                      Metadata

                      Assignees

                      No one assigned

                        Labels

                        No labels
                        No labels

                        Type

                        No type

                        Projects

                        No projects

                          Milestone

                          No milestone

                          Relationships

                          None yet

                          Development

                          No branches or pull requests

                          Issue actions

                          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
                          Skip to content

                          process-wrap v8.2.1, which uses the TokioCommandWrap struct. However, process-wrap v9.0.0 has renamed this to CommandWrap #578

                          Description

                          @Linuxdazhao

                          Describe the bug

                          The rmcp crate depends on process-wrap v8.2.1, which uses the TokioCommandWrap struct. However, process-wrap v9.0.0 has
                          renamed this to CommandWrap. This causes dependency conflicts when users need to use process-wrap v9.0.0 directly in
                          their projects alongside rmcp.

                          To Reproduce

                          1. Add rmcp v0.11.0 to your Cargo.toml with transport features:
                            rmcp = { version = "0.11.0", features = ["client", "transport-child-process"] }
                          2. Add process-wrap v9.0.0 directly to use its API:
                            process-wrap = { version = "9.0.0", features = ["tokio1"] }
                          3. Try to use TokioCommandWrap from process-wrap:
                            use process_wrap::tokio::TokioCommandWrap;
                          4. Run cargo check

                          Expected behavior

                          rmcp should depend on process-wrap v9.0.0 so that:

                          • There is only one version of process-wrap in the dependency tree
                          • Users can use the current process-wrap API (CommandWrap) without version conflicts
                          • Type compatibility is maintained when passing wrapped commands to rmcp's transport layer

                          Logs

                          error[E0432]: unresolved import process_wrap::tokio::TokioCommandWrap
                          --> src/tools/mcp/transport.rs:6:5
                          |
                          6 | use process_wrap::tokio::TokioCommandWrap;
                          | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^----------------
                          | | |
                          | | help: a similar name exists in the module: CommandWrap
                          | no TokioCommandWrap in tokio

                          Dependency tree shows two versions:
                          process-wrap v8.2.1
                          └── rmcp v0.11.0
                          └── my-project

                          process-wrap v9.0.0
                          └── my-project

                          Metadata

                          Metadata

                          Assignees

                          No one assigned

                            Labels

                            No labels
                            No labels

                            Type

                            No type

                            Projects

                            No projects

                              Milestone

                              No milestone

                              Relationships

                              None yet

                              Development

                              No branches or pull requests

                              Issue actions

                              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
                              Skip to content

                              process-wrap v8.2.1, which uses the TokioCommandWrap struct. However, process-wrap v9.0.0 has renamed this to CommandWrap #578

                              Description

                              @Linuxdazhao

                              Describe the bug

                              The rmcp crate depends on process-wrap v8.2.1, which uses the TokioCommandWrap struct. However, process-wrap v9.0.0 has
                              renamed this to CommandWrap. This causes dependency conflicts when users need to use process-wrap v9.0.0 directly in
                              their projects alongside rmcp.

                              To Reproduce

                              1. Add rmcp v0.11.0 to your Cargo.toml with transport features:
                                rmcp = { version = "0.11.0", features = ["client", "transport-child-process"] }
                              2. Add process-wrap v9.0.0 directly to use its API:
                                process-wrap = { version = "9.0.0", features = ["tokio1"] }
                              3. Try to use TokioCommandWrap from process-wrap:
                                use process_wrap::tokio::TokioCommandWrap;
                              4. Run cargo check

                              Expected behavior

                              rmcp should depend on process-wrap v9.0.0 so that:

                              • There is only one version of process-wrap in the dependency tree
                              • Users can use the current process-wrap API (CommandWrap) without version conflicts
                              • Type compatibility is maintained when passing wrapped commands to rmcp's transport layer

                              Logs

                              error[E0432]: unresolved import process_wrap::tokio::TokioCommandWrap
                              --> src/tools/mcp/transport.rs:6:5
                              |
                              6 | use process_wrap::tokio::TokioCommandWrap;
                              | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^----------------
                              | | |
                              | | help: a similar name exists in the module: CommandWrap
                              | no TokioCommandWrap in tokio

                              Dependency tree shows two versions:
                              process-wrap v8.2.1
                              └── rmcp v0.11.0
                              └── my-project

                              process-wrap v9.0.0
                              └── my-project

                              Metadata

                              Metadata

                              Assignees

                              No one assigned

                                Labels

                                No labels
                                No labels

                                Type

                                No type

                                Projects

                                No projects

                                  Milestone

                                  No milestone

                                  Relationships

                                  None yet

                                  Development

                                  No branches or pull requests

                                  Issue actions