Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
doc: add Inclusivity Working Group - #4355
Conversation
zkat
commented
Dec 19, 2015
LGTM although I'm not sure if mine counts for this since I'm not TSC :) 🐑 |
ghost
commented
Dec 19, 2015
pseudo-LGTM, also cc @nodejs/inclusivity |
mikeal
commented
Dec 19, 2015
Personally, I think that this working group should live under the TSC, not the CTC (Core Technical Committee) which means we should ratify it in Being that you'd be the first you'd actually be creating the WORKING_GROUPS.md file in |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I still have issues with the use of the word enforcement here. I recommend splitting this into two pieces and rewording to,
+ Serve as a resource for the development of workflows that protect community members and projects from harassment and abuse.
+ Work within the project and the community at large to ensure effective implementation of those workflows.
The issue with using enforcement is that it implies the ability to take punitive action and generally carries negative connotation.
jasnell
commented
Dec 19, 2015
I agree with @mikeal. The inclusivity working group should be chartered under the TSC not CTC. Recommend closing this PR and opening an equivalent in nodejs/TSC. |
ashleygwilliams
commented
Dec 19, 2015
+1 for moving to the TSC. uno momento |
jasnell
commented
Dec 20, 2015
hmm... the new PR doesn't actually add the Inclusivity WG details... did I miss something? |
ghost
commented
Dec 20, 2015
@jasnell i think it's clarified here: nodejs/TSC#24 (comment) |
ashleygwilliams
commented
Dec 20, 2015
yup, @sup, spot on. @jasnell, or anyone, can follow the inclusivity ratification process in this issue: nodejs/inclusivity#69. it is currently blocked by nodejs/TSC#24 |
jasnell
commented
Dec 20, 2015
OK, yep missed that one! Thanks @sup! |
fixesnodejs/inclusivity#69