fs: validate copyFile paths in the existing C++ binding - #65376

Open
anonrig wants to merge 2 commits into
nodejs:mainfrom
anonrig:cursor/copyfilesync-cpp-upstream-317c
Open

fs: validate copyFile paths in the existing C++ binding#65376
anonrig wants to merge 2 commits into
nodejs:mainfrom
anonrig:cursor/copyfilesync-cpp-upstream-317c

Conversation

@anonrig

@anonriganonrig commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Move getValidatedPath, file URL conversion, and NUL checks into the existing C++ binding.copyFile. fs.copyFile, fs.copyFileSync, and fs.promises.copyFile all pass the original arguments through.

There is no second copyFileSync binding. JavaScript only does VFS dispatch (still before validation). The copy itself uses uv_fs_copyfile, so COPYFILE_EXCL / FICLONE / FICLONE_FORCE, mode/timestamp preservation, and UV error shapes (syscall: 'copyfile', path / dest) stay the same.

This also fixes a crash in the C++ FileURLToPath helper: ERR_INVALID_FILE_URL_HOST used a format string without %s, which aborted on file URLs with a hostname. That path is now reachable from copyFile / copyFileSync.

Performance

Same-binary comparison of the old JS getValidatedPath + binding.copyFile path vs the unified C++-validated binding.copyFile (n=10000, 9 interleaved repeats, Release):

caseoldC++change
valid copy60.8 µs/op61.1 µs/op~same
missing src (ENOENT)5.52 µs/op5.39 µs/op~2% faster
invalid type8.04 µs/op3.92 µs/op~51% faster
file URL60.0 µs/op60.2 µs/op~same

benchmark/fs/bench-copyFileSync.js (n=10000) is dominated by uv_fs_copyfile I/O on valid (~16k ops/sec) and by ENOENT on invalid (~260k ops/sec). Those cases stay within a few percent of the old path. The win is validation-bound input (wrong type). Because validation now lives in binding.copyFile, the callback and promises entry points get the same path — not only copyFileSync.

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Tests
  • test/parallel/test-fs-copyfile.js (Buffer, Uint8Array, file: URL, non-file URL, encoded slashes, file URL host; callback copyFile also throws ERR_INVALID_URL_SCHEME)
  • test/parallel/test-fs-copyfile-respect-permissions.js
  • test/parallel/test-fs-null-bytes.js
  • test/parallel/test-fs-error-messages.js
  • test/parallel/test-permission-fs-read.js / test-permission-fs-write.js
  • VFS copyFile / copyFileSync tests

@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Review requested:

  • @nodejs/url

@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. lib / src Issues and PRs involving general changes in the lib/ or src/ directories. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. labels Aug 18, 2026
@cursor
cursorBotforce-pushed the cursor/copyfilesync-cpp-upstream-317c branch from e13ed43 to 8170ff5CompareAugust 18, 2026 12:47
Move path validation, file URL conversion, NUL checks, mode
validation, permission checks, and the copy into a dedicated
C++ binding so fs.copyFileSync() no longer goes through
getValidatedPath() in JavaScript.
VFS dispatch stays in JS and still runs before validation.
The copy itself uses uv_fs_copyfile, so flags, mode/timestamp
preservation, and UV error shapes stay the same.
Also fix FileURLToPath aborting on file URLs with a hostname
because the ERR_INVALID_FILE_URL_HOST format string lacked %s.
Signed-off-by: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
@cursor
cursorBotforce-pushed the cursor/copyfilesync-cpp-upstream-317c branch from 8170ff5 to e4dc3a1CompareAugust 18, 2026 13:11
@codecov

codecovBot commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 71.42857% with 28 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 90.12%. Comparing base (cf30b2e) to head (0fcda9b).
⚠️ Report is 69 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
src/node_file.cc70.52%10 Missing and 18 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #65376 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.11% 90.12% +0.01% 
==========================================
Files 752 752 Lines 251861 252394 +533 Branches 47365 47457 +92 ==========================================
+ Hits 226955 227478 +523 + Misses 16238 16217 -21 - Partials 8668 8699 +31 
Files with missing linesCoverage Δ
lib/fs.js98.39% <100.00%> (+0.02%)⬆️
lib/internal/fs/promises.js92.50% <100.00%> (-0.50%)⬇️
src/node_url.cc80.70% <100.00%> (+2.98%)⬆️
src/node_file.cc73.96% <70.52%> (-0.27%)⬇️

... and 69 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I don't understand this. copyFile seems already implemented in C++.

@anonrig

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I don't understand this. copyFile seems already implemented in C++.

Except getValidatedPath @mcollina

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Then why keep both methods? Can't we just fix copyFile and update all usage of that?

Fold getValidatedPath, file URL conversion, and NUL checks into
binding.copyFile so the sync, callback, and promises paths share
one implementation. Remove the extra copyFileSync binding.
Signed-off-by: Cursor Agent <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Co-authored-by: Yagiz Nizipli <anonrig@users.noreply.github.com>
@anonrig

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina you're right — no need for a second binding.

getValidatedPath, file URL conversion, and NUL checks now live in the existing C++ copyFile. fs.copyFile, fs.copyFileSync, and fs.promises.copyFile all call that one method with the original arguments. The extra copyFileSync binding is gone.

VFS dispatch is still in JS and still runs first.

@mcollinamcollina left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Please update the PR description

@mcollinamcollina added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 21, 2026
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 21, 2026
@anonriganonrig changed the title fs: implement copyFileSync in C++fs: validate copyFile paths in the existing C++ bindingAug 21, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Comment threadsrc/node_file.cc
}

Local<String> path_string;
if (!String::NewFromUtf8(isolate,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ToV8Value?

@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@mcollinamcollina added the commit-queue-squash PRs the Commit Queue should land as one squashed commit. label Aug 21, 2026
@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The first commit needs some changes, as it does not reflect what this PR does anymore.
The second commit has metadata issues.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

c++Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++.commit-queue-squashPRs the Commit Queue should land as one squashed commit.lib / srcIssues and PRs involving general changes in the lib/ or src/ directories.needs-ciPRs that need a full CI run.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@anonrig@nodejs-github-bot@mcollina@jasnell@cursoragent
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

fs: validate copyFile paths in the existing C++ binding - #65376

Open
anonrig wants to merge 2 commits into
nodejs:mainfrom
anonrig:cursor/copyfilesync-cpp-upstream-317c
Open

fs: validate copyFile paths in the existing C++ binding#65376
anonrig wants to merge 2 commits into
nodejs:mainfrom
anonrig:cursor/copyfilesync-cpp-upstream-317c

Conversation

@anonrig

@anonriganonrig commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Move getValidatedPath, file URL conversion, and NUL checks into the existing C++ binding.copyFile. fs.copyFile, fs.copyFileSync, and fs.promises.copyFile all pass the original arguments through.

There is no second copyFileSync binding. JavaScript only does VFS dispatch (still before validation). The copy itself uses uv_fs_copyfile, so COPYFILE_EXCL / FICLONE / FICLONE_FORCE, mode/timestamp preservation, and UV error shapes (syscall: 'copyfile', path / dest) stay the same.

This also fixes a crash in the C++ FileURLToPath helper: ERR_INVALID_FILE_URL_HOST used a format string without %s, which aborted on file URLs with a hostname. That path is now reachable from copyFile / copyFileSync.

Performance

Same-binary comparison of the old JS getValidatedPath + binding.copyFile path vs the unified C++-validated binding.copyFile (n=10000, 9 interleaved repeats, Release):

caseoldC++change
valid copy60.8 µs/op61.1 µs/op~same
missing src (ENOENT)5.52 µs/op5.39 µs/op~2% faster
invalid type8.04 µs/op3.92 µs/op~51% faster
file URL60.0 µs/op60.2 µs/op~same

benchmark/fs/bench-copyFileSync.js (n=10000) is dominated by uv_fs_copyfile I/O on valid (~16k ops/sec) and by ENOENT on invalid (~260k ops/sec). Those cases stay within a few percent of the old path. The win is validation-bound input (wrong type). Because validation now lives in binding.copyFile, the callback and promises entry points get the same path — not only copyFileSync.

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Tests
  • test/parallel/test-fs-copyfile.js (Buffer, Uint8Array, file: URL, non-file URL, encoded slashes, file URL host; callback copyFile also throws ERR_INVALID_URL_SCHEME)
  • test/parallel/test-fs-copyfile-respect-permissions.js
  • test/parallel/test-fs-null-bytes.js
  • test/parallel/test-fs-error-messages.js
  • test/parallel/test-permission-fs-read.js / test-permission-fs-write.js
  • VFS copyFile / copyFileSync tests

@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Review requested:

  • @nodejs/url

@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. lib / src Issues and PRs involving general changes in the lib/ or src/ directories. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. labels Aug 18, 2026
@cursor
cursorBotforce-pushed the cursor/copyfilesync-cpp-upstream-317c branch from e13ed43 to 8170ff5CompareAugust 18, 2026 12:47
Move path validation, file URL conversion, NUL checks, mode
validation, permission checks, and the copy into a dedicated
C++ binding so fs.copyFileSync() no longer goes through
getValidatedPath() in JavaScript.
VFS dispatch stays in JS and still runs before validation.
The copy itself uses uv_fs_copyfile, so flags, mode/timestamp
preservation, and UV error shapes stay the same.
Also fix FileURLToPath aborting on file URLs with a hostname
because the ERR_INVALID_FILE_URL_HOST format string lacked %s.
Signed-off-by: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
@cursor
cursorBotforce-pushed the cursor/copyfilesync-cpp-upstream-317c branch from 8170ff5 to e4dc3a1CompareAugust 18, 2026 13:11
@codecov

codecovBot commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 71.42857% with 28 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 90.12%. Comparing base (cf30b2e) to head (0fcda9b).
⚠️ Report is 69 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
src/node_file.cc70.52%10 Missing and 18 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #65376 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.11% 90.12% +0.01% 
==========================================
Files 752 752 Lines 251861 252394 +533 Branches 47365 47457 +92 ==========================================
+ Hits 226955 227478 +523 + Misses 16238 16217 -21 - Partials 8668 8699 +31 
Files with missing linesCoverage Δ
lib/fs.js98.39% <100.00%> (+0.02%)⬆️
lib/internal/fs/promises.js92.50% <100.00%> (-0.50%)⬇️
src/node_url.cc80.70% <100.00%> (+2.98%)⬆️
src/node_file.cc73.96% <70.52%> (-0.27%)⬇️

... and 69 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I don't understand this. copyFile seems already implemented in C++.

@anonrig

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I don't understand this. copyFile seems already implemented in C++.

Except getValidatedPath @mcollina

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Then why keep both methods? Can't we just fix copyFile and update all usage of that?

Fold getValidatedPath, file URL conversion, and NUL checks into
binding.copyFile so the sync, callback, and promises paths share
one implementation. Remove the extra copyFileSync binding.
Signed-off-by: Cursor Agent <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Co-authored-by: Yagiz Nizipli <anonrig@users.noreply.github.com>
@anonrig

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina you're right — no need for a second binding.

getValidatedPath, file URL conversion, and NUL checks now live in the existing C++ copyFile. fs.copyFile, fs.copyFileSync, and fs.promises.copyFile all call that one method with the original arguments. The extra copyFileSync binding is gone.

VFS dispatch is still in JS and still runs first.

@mcollinamcollina left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Please update the PR description

@mcollinamcollina added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 21, 2026
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 21, 2026
@anonriganonrig changed the title fs: implement copyFileSync in C++fs: validate copyFile paths in the existing C++ bindingAug 21, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Comment threadsrc/node_file.cc
}

Local<String> path_string;
if (!String::NewFromUtf8(isolate,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ToV8Value?

@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@mcollinamcollina added the commit-queue-squash PRs the Commit Queue should land as one squashed commit. label Aug 21, 2026
@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The first commit needs some changes, as it does not reflect what this PR does anymore.
The second commit has metadata issues.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

c++Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++.commit-queue-squashPRs the Commit Queue should land as one squashed commit.lib / srcIssues and PRs involving general changes in the lib/ or src/ directories.needs-ciPRs that need a full CI run.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@anonrig@nodejs-github-bot@mcollina@jasnell@cursoragent
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fs: validate copyFile paths in the existing C++ binding - #65376

Open
anonrig wants to merge 2 commits into
nodejs:mainfrom
anonrig:cursor/copyfilesync-cpp-upstream-317c
Open

fs: validate copyFile paths in the existing C++ binding#65376
anonrig wants to merge 2 commits into
nodejs:mainfrom
anonrig:cursor/copyfilesync-cpp-upstream-317c

Conversation

@anonrig

@anonriganonrig commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Move getValidatedPath, file URL conversion, and NUL checks into the existing C++ binding.copyFile. fs.copyFile, fs.copyFileSync, and fs.promises.copyFile all pass the original arguments through.

There is no second copyFileSync binding. JavaScript only does VFS dispatch (still before validation). The copy itself uses uv_fs_copyfile, so COPYFILE_EXCL / FICLONE / FICLONE_FORCE, mode/timestamp preservation, and UV error shapes (syscall: 'copyfile', path / dest) stay the same.

This also fixes a crash in the C++ FileURLToPath helper: ERR_INVALID_FILE_URL_HOST used a format string without %s, which aborted on file URLs with a hostname. That path is now reachable from copyFile / copyFileSync.

Performance

Same-binary comparison of the old JS getValidatedPath + binding.copyFile path vs the unified C++-validated binding.copyFile (n=10000, 9 interleaved repeats, Release):

caseoldC++change
valid copy60.8 µs/op61.1 µs/op~same
missing src (ENOENT)5.52 µs/op5.39 µs/op~2% faster
invalid type8.04 µs/op3.92 µs/op~51% faster
file URL60.0 µs/op60.2 µs/op~same

benchmark/fs/bench-copyFileSync.js (n=10000) is dominated by uv_fs_copyfile I/O on valid (~16k ops/sec) and by ENOENT on invalid (~260k ops/sec). Those cases stay within a few percent of the old path. The win is validation-bound input (wrong type). Because validation now lives in binding.copyFile, the callback and promises entry points get the same path — not only copyFileSync.

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Tests
  • test/parallel/test-fs-copyfile.js (Buffer, Uint8Array, file: URL, non-file URL, encoded slashes, file URL host; callback copyFile also throws ERR_INVALID_URL_SCHEME)
  • test/parallel/test-fs-copyfile-respect-permissions.js
  • test/parallel/test-fs-null-bytes.js
  • test/parallel/test-fs-error-messages.js
  • test/parallel/test-permission-fs-read.js / test-permission-fs-write.js
  • VFS copyFile / copyFileSync tests

@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Review requested:

  • @nodejs/url

@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. lib / src Issues and PRs involving general changes in the lib/ or src/ directories. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. labels Aug 18, 2026
@cursor
cursorBotforce-pushed the cursor/copyfilesync-cpp-upstream-317c branch from e13ed43 to 8170ff5CompareAugust 18, 2026 12:47
Move path validation, file URL conversion, NUL checks, mode
validation, permission checks, and the copy into a dedicated
C++ binding so fs.copyFileSync() no longer goes through
getValidatedPath() in JavaScript.
VFS dispatch stays in JS and still runs before validation.
The copy itself uses uv_fs_copyfile, so flags, mode/timestamp
preservation, and UV error shapes stay the same.
Also fix FileURLToPath aborting on file URLs with a hostname
because the ERR_INVALID_FILE_URL_HOST format string lacked %s.
Signed-off-by: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
@cursor
cursorBotforce-pushed the cursor/copyfilesync-cpp-upstream-317c branch from 8170ff5 to e4dc3a1CompareAugust 18, 2026 13:11
@codecov

codecovBot commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 71.42857% with 28 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 90.12%. Comparing base (cf30b2e) to head (0fcda9b).
⚠️ Report is 69 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
src/node_file.cc70.52%10 Missing and 18 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #65376 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.11% 90.12% +0.01% 
==========================================
Files 752 752 Lines 251861 252394 +533 Branches 47365 47457 +92 ==========================================
+ Hits 226955 227478 +523 + Misses 16238 16217 -21 - Partials 8668 8699 +31 
Files with missing linesCoverage Δ
lib/fs.js98.39% <100.00%> (+0.02%)⬆️
lib/internal/fs/promises.js92.50% <100.00%> (-0.50%)⬇️
src/node_url.cc80.70% <100.00%> (+2.98%)⬆️
src/node_file.cc73.96% <70.52%> (-0.27%)⬇️

... and 69 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I don't understand this. copyFile seems already implemented in C++.

@anonrig

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I don't understand this. copyFile seems already implemented in C++.

Except getValidatedPath @mcollina

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Then why keep both methods? Can't we just fix copyFile and update all usage of that?

Fold getValidatedPath, file URL conversion, and NUL checks into
binding.copyFile so the sync, callback, and promises paths share
one implementation. Remove the extra copyFileSync binding.
Signed-off-by: Cursor Agent <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Co-authored-by: Yagiz Nizipli <anonrig@users.noreply.github.com>
@anonrig

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina you're right — no need for a second binding.

getValidatedPath, file URL conversion, and NUL checks now live in the existing C++ copyFile. fs.copyFile, fs.copyFileSync, and fs.promises.copyFile all call that one method with the original arguments. The extra copyFileSync binding is gone.

VFS dispatch is still in JS and still runs first.

@mcollinamcollina left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Please update the PR description

@mcollinamcollina added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 21, 2026
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 21, 2026
@anonriganonrig changed the title fs: implement copyFileSync in C++fs: validate copyFile paths in the existing C++ bindingAug 21, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Comment threadsrc/node_file.cc
}

Local<String> path_string;
if (!String::NewFromUtf8(isolate,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ToV8Value?

@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@mcollinamcollina added the commit-queue-squash PRs the Commit Queue should land as one squashed commit. label Aug 21, 2026
@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The first commit needs some changes, as it does not reflect what this PR does anymore.
The second commit has metadata issues.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

c++Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++.commit-queue-squashPRs the Commit Queue should land as one squashed commit.lib / srcIssues and PRs involving general changes in the lib/ or src/ directories.needs-ciPRs that need a full CI run.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@anonrig@nodejs-github-bot@mcollina@jasnell@cursoragent
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fs: validate copyFile paths in the existing C++ binding - #65376

Open
anonrig wants to merge 2 commits into
nodejs:mainfrom
anonrig:cursor/copyfilesync-cpp-upstream-317c
Open

fs: validate copyFile paths in the existing C++ binding#65376
anonrig wants to merge 2 commits into
nodejs:mainfrom
anonrig:cursor/copyfilesync-cpp-upstream-317c

Conversation

@anonrig

@anonriganonrig commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Move getValidatedPath, file URL conversion, and NUL checks into the existing C++ binding.copyFile. fs.copyFile, fs.copyFileSync, and fs.promises.copyFile all pass the original arguments through.

There is no second copyFileSync binding. JavaScript only does VFS dispatch (still before validation). The copy itself uses uv_fs_copyfile, so COPYFILE_EXCL / FICLONE / FICLONE_FORCE, mode/timestamp preservation, and UV error shapes (syscall: 'copyfile', path / dest) stay the same.

This also fixes a crash in the C++ FileURLToPath helper: ERR_INVALID_FILE_URL_HOST used a format string without %s, which aborted on file URLs with a hostname. That path is now reachable from copyFile / copyFileSync.

Performance

Same-binary comparison of the old JS getValidatedPath + binding.copyFile path vs the unified C++-validated binding.copyFile (n=10000, 9 interleaved repeats, Release):

caseoldC++change
valid copy60.8 µs/op61.1 µs/op~same
missing src (ENOENT)5.52 µs/op5.39 µs/op~2% faster
invalid type8.04 µs/op3.92 µs/op~51% faster
file URL60.0 µs/op60.2 µs/op~same

benchmark/fs/bench-copyFileSync.js (n=10000) is dominated by uv_fs_copyfile I/O on valid (~16k ops/sec) and by ENOENT on invalid (~260k ops/sec). Those cases stay within a few percent of the old path. The win is validation-bound input (wrong type). Because validation now lives in binding.copyFile, the callback and promises entry points get the same path — not only copyFileSync.

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Tests
  • test/parallel/test-fs-copyfile.js (Buffer, Uint8Array, file: URL, non-file URL, encoded slashes, file URL host; callback copyFile also throws ERR_INVALID_URL_SCHEME)
  • test/parallel/test-fs-copyfile-respect-permissions.js
  • test/parallel/test-fs-null-bytes.js
  • test/parallel/test-fs-error-messages.js
  • test/parallel/test-permission-fs-read.js / test-permission-fs-write.js
  • VFS copyFile / copyFileSync tests

@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Review requested:

  • @nodejs/url

@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. lib / src Issues and PRs involving general changes in the lib/ or src/ directories. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. labels Aug 18, 2026
@cursor
cursorBotforce-pushed the cursor/copyfilesync-cpp-upstream-317c branch from e13ed43 to 8170ff5CompareAugust 18, 2026 12:47
Move path validation, file URL conversion, NUL checks, mode
validation, permission checks, and the copy into a dedicated
C++ binding so fs.copyFileSync() no longer goes through
getValidatedPath() in JavaScript.
VFS dispatch stays in JS and still runs before validation.
The copy itself uses uv_fs_copyfile, so flags, mode/timestamp
preservation, and UV error shapes stay the same.
Also fix FileURLToPath aborting on file URLs with a hostname
because the ERR_INVALID_FILE_URL_HOST format string lacked %s.
Signed-off-by: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
@cursor
cursorBotforce-pushed the cursor/copyfilesync-cpp-upstream-317c branch from 8170ff5 to e4dc3a1CompareAugust 18, 2026 13:11
@codecov

codecovBot commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 71.42857% with 28 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 90.12%. Comparing base (cf30b2e) to head (0fcda9b).
⚠️ Report is 69 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
src/node_file.cc70.52%10 Missing and 18 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #65376 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.11% 90.12% +0.01% 
==========================================
Files 752 752 Lines 251861 252394 +533 Branches 47365 47457 +92 ==========================================
+ Hits 226955 227478 +523 + Misses 16238 16217 -21 - Partials 8668 8699 +31 
Files with missing linesCoverage Δ
lib/fs.js98.39% <100.00%> (+0.02%)⬆️
lib/internal/fs/promises.js92.50% <100.00%> (-0.50%)⬇️
src/node_url.cc80.70% <100.00%> (+2.98%)⬆️
src/node_file.cc73.96% <70.52%> (-0.27%)⬇️

... and 69 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I don't understand this. copyFile seems already implemented in C++.

@anonrig

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I don't understand this. copyFile seems already implemented in C++.

Except getValidatedPath @mcollina

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Then why keep both methods? Can't we just fix copyFile and update all usage of that?

Fold getValidatedPath, file URL conversion, and NUL checks into
binding.copyFile so the sync, callback, and promises paths share
one implementation. Remove the extra copyFileSync binding.
Signed-off-by: Cursor Agent <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Co-authored-by: Yagiz Nizipli <anonrig@users.noreply.github.com>
@anonrig

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina you're right — no need for a second binding.

getValidatedPath, file URL conversion, and NUL checks now live in the existing C++ copyFile. fs.copyFile, fs.copyFileSync, and fs.promises.copyFile all call that one method with the original arguments. The extra copyFileSync binding is gone.

VFS dispatch is still in JS and still runs first.

@mcollinamcollina left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Please update the PR description

@mcollinamcollina added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 21, 2026
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 21, 2026
@anonriganonrig changed the title fs: implement copyFileSync in C++fs: validate copyFile paths in the existing C++ bindingAug 21, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Comment threadsrc/node_file.cc
}

Local<String> path_string;
if (!String::NewFromUtf8(isolate,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ToV8Value?

@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@mcollinamcollina added the commit-queue-squash PRs the Commit Queue should land as one squashed commit. label Aug 21, 2026
@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The first commit needs some changes, as it does not reflect what this PR does anymore.
The second commit has metadata issues.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

c++Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++.commit-queue-squashPRs the Commit Queue should land as one squashed commit.lib / srcIssues and PRs involving general changes in the lib/ or src/ directories.needs-ciPRs that need a full CI run.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@anonrig@nodejs-github-bot@mcollina@jasnell@cursoragent
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

fs: validate copyFile paths in the existing C++ binding - #65376

Open
anonrig wants to merge 2 commits into
nodejs:mainfrom
anonrig:cursor/copyfilesync-cpp-upstream-317c
Open

fs: validate copyFile paths in the existing C++ binding#65376
anonrig wants to merge 2 commits into
nodejs:mainfrom
anonrig:cursor/copyfilesync-cpp-upstream-317c

Conversation

@anonrig

@anonriganonrig commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Move getValidatedPath, file URL conversion, and NUL checks into the existing C++ binding.copyFile. fs.copyFile, fs.copyFileSync, and fs.promises.copyFile all pass the original arguments through.

There is no second copyFileSync binding. JavaScript only does VFS dispatch (still before validation). The copy itself uses uv_fs_copyfile, so COPYFILE_EXCL / FICLONE / FICLONE_FORCE, mode/timestamp preservation, and UV error shapes (syscall: 'copyfile', path / dest) stay the same.

This also fixes a crash in the C++ FileURLToPath helper: ERR_INVALID_FILE_URL_HOST used a format string without %s, which aborted on file URLs with a hostname. That path is now reachable from copyFile / copyFileSync.

Performance

Same-binary comparison of the old JS getValidatedPath + binding.copyFile path vs the unified C++-validated binding.copyFile (n=10000, 9 interleaved repeats, Release):

caseoldC++change
valid copy60.8 µs/op61.1 µs/op~same
missing src (ENOENT)5.52 µs/op5.39 µs/op~2% faster
invalid type8.04 µs/op3.92 µs/op~51% faster
file URL60.0 µs/op60.2 µs/op~same

benchmark/fs/bench-copyFileSync.js (n=10000) is dominated by uv_fs_copyfile I/O on valid (~16k ops/sec) and by ENOENT on invalid (~260k ops/sec). Those cases stay within a few percent of the old path. The win is validation-bound input (wrong type). Because validation now lives in binding.copyFile, the callback and promises entry points get the same path — not only copyFileSync.

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Tests
  • test/parallel/test-fs-copyfile.js (Buffer, Uint8Array, file: URL, non-file URL, encoded slashes, file URL host; callback copyFile also throws ERR_INVALID_URL_SCHEME)
  • test/parallel/test-fs-copyfile-respect-permissions.js
  • test/parallel/test-fs-null-bytes.js
  • test/parallel/test-fs-error-messages.js
  • test/parallel/test-permission-fs-read.js / test-permission-fs-write.js
  • VFS copyFile / copyFileSync tests

@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Review requested:

  • @nodejs/url

@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. lib / src Issues and PRs involving general changes in the lib/ or src/ directories. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. labels Aug 18, 2026
@cursor
cursorBotforce-pushed the cursor/copyfilesync-cpp-upstream-317c branch from e13ed43 to 8170ff5CompareAugust 18, 2026 12:47
Move path validation, file URL conversion, NUL checks, mode
validation, permission checks, and the copy into a dedicated
C++ binding so fs.copyFileSync() no longer goes through
getValidatedPath() in JavaScript.
VFS dispatch stays in JS and still runs before validation.
The copy itself uses uv_fs_copyfile, so flags, mode/timestamp
preservation, and UV error shapes stay the same.
Also fix FileURLToPath aborting on file URLs with a hostname
because the ERR_INVALID_FILE_URL_HOST format string lacked %s.
Signed-off-by: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
@cursor
cursorBotforce-pushed the cursor/copyfilesync-cpp-upstream-317c branch from 8170ff5 to e4dc3a1CompareAugust 18, 2026 13:11
@codecov

codecovBot commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 71.42857% with 28 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 90.12%. Comparing base (cf30b2e) to head (0fcda9b).
⚠️ Report is 69 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
src/node_file.cc70.52%10 Missing and 18 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #65376 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.11% 90.12% +0.01% 
==========================================
Files 752 752 Lines 251861 252394 +533 Branches 47365 47457 +92 ==========================================
+ Hits 226955 227478 +523 + Misses 16238 16217 -21 - Partials 8668 8699 +31 
Files with missing linesCoverage Δ
lib/fs.js98.39% <100.00%> (+0.02%)⬆️
lib/internal/fs/promises.js92.50% <100.00%> (-0.50%)⬇️
src/node_url.cc80.70% <100.00%> (+2.98%)⬆️
src/node_file.cc73.96% <70.52%> (-0.27%)⬇️

... and 69 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I don't understand this. copyFile seems already implemented in C++.

@anonrig

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I don't understand this. copyFile seems already implemented in C++.

Except getValidatedPath @mcollina

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Then why keep both methods? Can't we just fix copyFile and update all usage of that?

Fold getValidatedPath, file URL conversion, and NUL checks into
binding.copyFile so the sync, callback, and promises paths share
one implementation. Remove the extra copyFileSync binding.
Signed-off-by: Cursor Agent <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Co-authored-by: Yagiz Nizipli <anonrig@users.noreply.github.com>
@anonrig

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina you're right — no need for a second binding.

getValidatedPath, file URL conversion, and NUL checks now live in the existing C++ copyFile. fs.copyFile, fs.copyFileSync, and fs.promises.copyFile all call that one method with the original arguments. The extra copyFileSync binding is gone.

VFS dispatch is still in JS and still runs first.

@mcollinamcollina left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Please update the PR description

@mcollinamcollina added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 21, 2026
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 21, 2026
@anonriganonrig changed the title fs: implement copyFileSync in C++fs: validate copyFile paths in the existing C++ bindingAug 21, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Comment threadsrc/node_file.cc
}

Local<String> path_string;
if (!String::NewFromUtf8(isolate,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ToV8Value?

@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@mcollinamcollina added the commit-queue-squash PRs the Commit Queue should land as one squashed commit. label Aug 21, 2026
@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The first commit needs some changes, as it does not reflect what this PR does anymore.
The second commit has metadata issues.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

c++Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++.commit-queue-squashPRs the Commit Queue should land as one squashed commit.lib / srcIssues and PRs involving general changes in the lib/ or src/ directories.needs-ciPRs that need a full CI run.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@anonrig@nodejs-github-bot@mcollina@jasnell@cursoragent
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fs: validate copyFile paths in the existing C++ binding - #65376

Open
anonrig wants to merge 2 commits into
nodejs:mainfrom
anonrig:cursor/copyfilesync-cpp-upstream-317c
Open

fs: validate copyFile paths in the existing C++ binding#65376
anonrig wants to merge 2 commits into
nodejs:mainfrom
anonrig:cursor/copyfilesync-cpp-upstream-317c

Conversation

@anonrig

@anonriganonrig commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Move getValidatedPath, file URL conversion, and NUL checks into the existing C++ binding.copyFile. fs.copyFile, fs.copyFileSync, and fs.promises.copyFile all pass the original arguments through.

There is no second copyFileSync binding. JavaScript only does VFS dispatch (still before validation). The copy itself uses uv_fs_copyfile, so COPYFILE_EXCL / FICLONE / FICLONE_FORCE, mode/timestamp preservation, and UV error shapes (syscall: 'copyfile', path / dest) stay the same.

This also fixes a crash in the C++ FileURLToPath helper: ERR_INVALID_FILE_URL_HOST used a format string without %s, which aborted on file URLs with a hostname. That path is now reachable from copyFile / copyFileSync.

Performance

Same-binary comparison of the old JS getValidatedPath + binding.copyFile path vs the unified C++-validated binding.copyFile (n=10000, 9 interleaved repeats, Release):

caseoldC++change
valid copy60.8 µs/op61.1 µs/op~same
missing src (ENOENT)5.52 µs/op5.39 µs/op~2% faster
invalid type8.04 µs/op3.92 µs/op~51% faster
file URL60.0 µs/op60.2 µs/op~same

benchmark/fs/bench-copyFileSync.js (n=10000) is dominated by uv_fs_copyfile I/O on valid (~16k ops/sec) and by ENOENT on invalid (~260k ops/sec). Those cases stay within a few percent of the old path. The win is validation-bound input (wrong type). Because validation now lives in binding.copyFile, the callback and promises entry points get the same path — not only copyFileSync.

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Tests
  • test/parallel/test-fs-copyfile.js (Buffer, Uint8Array, file: URL, non-file URL, encoded slashes, file URL host; callback copyFile also throws ERR_INVALID_URL_SCHEME)
  • test/parallel/test-fs-copyfile-respect-permissions.js
  • test/parallel/test-fs-null-bytes.js
  • test/parallel/test-fs-error-messages.js
  • test/parallel/test-permission-fs-read.js / test-permission-fs-write.js
  • VFS copyFile / copyFileSync tests

@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Review requested:

  • @nodejs/url

@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. lib / src Issues and PRs involving general changes in the lib/ or src/ directories. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. labels Aug 18, 2026
@cursor
cursorBotforce-pushed the cursor/copyfilesync-cpp-upstream-317c branch from e13ed43 to 8170ff5CompareAugust 18, 2026 12:47
Move path validation, file URL conversion, NUL checks, mode
validation, permission checks, and the copy into a dedicated
C++ binding so fs.copyFileSync() no longer goes through
getValidatedPath() in JavaScript.
VFS dispatch stays in JS and still runs before validation.
The copy itself uses uv_fs_copyfile, so flags, mode/timestamp
preservation, and UV error shapes stay the same.
Also fix FileURLToPath aborting on file URLs with a hostname
because the ERR_INVALID_FILE_URL_HOST format string lacked %s.
Signed-off-by: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
@cursor
cursorBotforce-pushed the cursor/copyfilesync-cpp-upstream-317c branch from 8170ff5 to e4dc3a1CompareAugust 18, 2026 13:11
@codecov

codecovBot commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 71.42857% with 28 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 90.12%. Comparing base (cf30b2e) to head (0fcda9b).
⚠️ Report is 69 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
src/node_file.cc70.52%10 Missing and 18 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #65376 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.11% 90.12% +0.01% 
==========================================
Files 752 752 Lines 251861 252394 +533 Branches 47365 47457 +92 ==========================================
+ Hits 226955 227478 +523 + Misses 16238 16217 -21 - Partials 8668 8699 +31 
Files with missing linesCoverage Δ
lib/fs.js98.39% <100.00%> (+0.02%)⬆️
lib/internal/fs/promises.js92.50% <100.00%> (-0.50%)⬇️
src/node_url.cc80.70% <100.00%> (+2.98%)⬆️
src/node_file.cc73.96% <70.52%> (-0.27%)⬇️

... and 69 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I don't understand this. copyFile seems already implemented in C++.

@anonrig

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I don't understand this. copyFile seems already implemented in C++.

Except getValidatedPath @mcollina

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Then why keep both methods? Can't we just fix copyFile and update all usage of that?

Fold getValidatedPath, file URL conversion, and NUL checks into
binding.copyFile so the sync, callback, and promises paths share
one implementation. Remove the extra copyFileSync binding.
Signed-off-by: Cursor Agent <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Co-authored-by: Yagiz Nizipli <anonrig@users.noreply.github.com>
@anonrig

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina you're right — no need for a second binding.

getValidatedPath, file URL conversion, and NUL checks now live in the existing C++ copyFile. fs.copyFile, fs.copyFileSync, and fs.promises.copyFile all call that one method with the original arguments. The extra copyFileSync binding is gone.

VFS dispatch is still in JS and still runs first.

@mcollinamcollina left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Please update the PR description

@mcollinamcollina added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 21, 2026
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 21, 2026
@anonriganonrig changed the title fs: implement copyFileSync in C++fs: validate copyFile paths in the existing C++ bindingAug 21, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Comment threadsrc/node_file.cc
}

Local<String> path_string;
if (!String::NewFromUtf8(isolate,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ToV8Value?

@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@mcollinamcollina added the commit-queue-squash PRs the Commit Queue should land as one squashed commit. label Aug 21, 2026
@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The first commit needs some changes, as it does not reflect what this PR does anymore.
The second commit has metadata issues.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

c++Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++.commit-queue-squashPRs the Commit Queue should land as one squashed commit.lib / srcIssues and PRs involving general changes in the lib/ or src/ directories.needs-ciPRs that need a full CI run.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@anonrig@nodejs-github-bot@mcollina@jasnell@cursoragent
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

fs: validate copyFile paths in the existing C++ binding - #65376

Open
anonrig wants to merge 2 commits into
nodejs:mainfrom
anonrig:cursor/copyfilesync-cpp-upstream-317c
Open

fs: validate copyFile paths in the existing C++ binding#65376
anonrig wants to merge 2 commits into
nodejs:mainfrom
anonrig:cursor/copyfilesync-cpp-upstream-317c

Conversation

@anonrig

@anonriganonrig commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Move getValidatedPath, file URL conversion, and NUL checks into the existing C++ binding.copyFile. fs.copyFile, fs.copyFileSync, and fs.promises.copyFile all pass the original arguments through.

There is no second copyFileSync binding. JavaScript only does VFS dispatch (still before validation). The copy itself uses uv_fs_copyfile, so COPYFILE_EXCL / FICLONE / FICLONE_FORCE, mode/timestamp preservation, and UV error shapes (syscall: 'copyfile', path / dest) stay the same.

This also fixes a crash in the C++ FileURLToPath helper: ERR_INVALID_FILE_URL_HOST used a format string without %s, which aborted on file URLs with a hostname. That path is now reachable from copyFile / copyFileSync.

Performance

Same-binary comparison of the old JS getValidatedPath + binding.copyFile path vs the unified C++-validated binding.copyFile (n=10000, 9 interleaved repeats, Release):

caseoldC++change
valid copy60.8 µs/op61.1 µs/op~same
missing src (ENOENT)5.52 µs/op5.39 µs/op~2% faster
invalid type8.04 µs/op3.92 µs/op~51% faster
file URL60.0 µs/op60.2 µs/op~same

benchmark/fs/bench-copyFileSync.js (n=10000) is dominated by uv_fs_copyfile I/O on valid (~16k ops/sec) and by ENOENT on invalid (~260k ops/sec). Those cases stay within a few percent of the old path. The win is validation-bound input (wrong type). Because validation now lives in binding.copyFile, the callback and promises entry points get the same path — not only copyFileSync.

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Tests
  • test/parallel/test-fs-copyfile.js (Buffer, Uint8Array, file: URL, non-file URL, encoded slashes, file URL host; callback copyFile also throws ERR_INVALID_URL_SCHEME)
  • test/parallel/test-fs-copyfile-respect-permissions.js
  • test/parallel/test-fs-null-bytes.js
  • test/parallel/test-fs-error-messages.js
  • test/parallel/test-permission-fs-read.js / test-permission-fs-write.js
  • VFS copyFile / copyFileSync tests

@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Review requested:

  • @nodejs/url

@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. lib / src Issues and PRs involving general changes in the lib/ or src/ directories. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. labels Aug 18, 2026
@cursor
cursorBotforce-pushed the cursor/copyfilesync-cpp-upstream-317c branch from e13ed43 to 8170ff5CompareAugust 18, 2026 12:47
Move path validation, file URL conversion, NUL checks, mode
validation, permission checks, and the copy into a dedicated
C++ binding so fs.copyFileSync() no longer goes through
getValidatedPath() in JavaScript.
VFS dispatch stays in JS and still runs before validation.
The copy itself uses uv_fs_copyfile, so flags, mode/timestamp
preservation, and UV error shapes stay the same.
Also fix FileURLToPath aborting on file URLs with a hostname
because the ERR_INVALID_FILE_URL_HOST format string lacked %s.
Signed-off-by: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
@cursor
cursorBotforce-pushed the cursor/copyfilesync-cpp-upstream-317c branch from 8170ff5 to e4dc3a1CompareAugust 18, 2026 13:11
@codecov

codecovBot commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 71.42857% with 28 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 90.12%. Comparing base (cf30b2e) to head (0fcda9b).
⚠️ Report is 69 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
src/node_file.cc70.52%10 Missing and 18 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #65376 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.11% 90.12% +0.01% 
==========================================
Files 752 752 Lines 251861 252394 +533 Branches 47365 47457 +92 ==========================================
+ Hits 226955 227478 +523 + Misses 16238 16217 -21 - Partials 8668 8699 +31 
Files with missing linesCoverage Δ
lib/fs.js98.39% <100.00%> (+0.02%)⬆️
lib/internal/fs/promises.js92.50% <100.00%> (-0.50%)⬇️
src/node_url.cc80.70% <100.00%> (+2.98%)⬆️
src/node_file.cc73.96% <70.52%> (-0.27%)⬇️

... and 69 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I don't understand this. copyFile seems already implemented in C++.

@anonrig

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I don't understand this. copyFile seems already implemented in C++.

Except getValidatedPath @mcollina

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Then why keep both methods? Can't we just fix copyFile and update all usage of that?

Fold getValidatedPath, file URL conversion, and NUL checks into
binding.copyFile so the sync, callback, and promises paths share
one implementation. Remove the extra copyFileSync binding.
Signed-off-by: Cursor Agent <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Co-authored-by: Yagiz Nizipli <anonrig@users.noreply.github.com>
@anonrig

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina you're right — no need for a second binding.

getValidatedPath, file URL conversion, and NUL checks now live in the existing C++ copyFile. fs.copyFile, fs.copyFileSync, and fs.promises.copyFile all call that one method with the original arguments. The extra copyFileSync binding is gone.

VFS dispatch is still in JS and still runs first.

@mcollinamcollina left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Please update the PR description

@mcollinamcollina added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 21, 2026
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 21, 2026
@anonriganonrig changed the title fs: implement copyFileSync in C++fs: validate copyFile paths in the existing C++ bindingAug 21, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Comment threadsrc/node_file.cc
}

Local<String> path_string;
if (!String::NewFromUtf8(isolate,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ToV8Value?

@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@mcollinamcollina added the commit-queue-squash PRs the Commit Queue should land as one squashed commit. label Aug 21, 2026
@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The first commit needs some changes, as it does not reflect what this PR does anymore.
The second commit has metadata issues.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

c++Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++.commit-queue-squashPRs the Commit Queue should land as one squashed commit.lib / srcIssues and PRs involving general changes in the lib/ or src/ directories.needs-ciPRs that need a full CI run.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@anonrig@nodejs-github-bot@mcollina@jasnell@cursoragent
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

fs: validate copyFile paths in the existing C++ binding - #65376

Open
anonrig wants to merge 2 commits into
nodejs:mainfrom
anonrig:cursor/copyfilesync-cpp-upstream-317c
Open

fs: validate copyFile paths in the existing C++ binding#65376
anonrig wants to merge 2 commits into
nodejs:mainfrom
anonrig:cursor/copyfilesync-cpp-upstream-317c

Conversation

@anonrig

@anonriganonrig commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Move getValidatedPath, file URL conversion, and NUL checks into the existing C++ binding.copyFile. fs.copyFile, fs.copyFileSync, and fs.promises.copyFile all pass the original arguments through.

There is no second copyFileSync binding. JavaScript only does VFS dispatch (still before validation). The copy itself uses uv_fs_copyfile, so COPYFILE_EXCL / FICLONE / FICLONE_FORCE, mode/timestamp preservation, and UV error shapes (syscall: 'copyfile', path / dest) stay the same.

This also fixes a crash in the C++ FileURLToPath helper: ERR_INVALID_FILE_URL_HOST used a format string without %s, which aborted on file URLs with a hostname. That path is now reachable from copyFile / copyFileSync.

Performance

Same-binary comparison of the old JS getValidatedPath + binding.copyFile path vs the unified C++-validated binding.copyFile (n=10000, 9 interleaved repeats, Release):

caseoldC++change
valid copy60.8 µs/op61.1 µs/op~same
missing src (ENOENT)5.52 µs/op5.39 µs/op~2% faster
invalid type8.04 µs/op3.92 µs/op~51% faster
file URL60.0 µs/op60.2 µs/op~same

benchmark/fs/bench-copyFileSync.js (n=10000) is dominated by uv_fs_copyfile I/O on valid (~16k ops/sec) and by ENOENT on invalid (~260k ops/sec). Those cases stay within a few percent of the old path. The win is validation-bound input (wrong type). Because validation now lives in binding.copyFile, the callback and promises entry points get the same path — not only copyFileSync.

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Tests
  • test/parallel/test-fs-copyfile.js (Buffer, Uint8Array, file: URL, non-file URL, encoded slashes, file URL host; callback copyFile also throws ERR_INVALID_URL_SCHEME)
  • test/parallel/test-fs-copyfile-respect-permissions.js
  • test/parallel/test-fs-null-bytes.js
  • test/parallel/test-fs-error-messages.js
  • test/parallel/test-permission-fs-read.js / test-permission-fs-write.js
  • VFS copyFile / copyFileSync tests

@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Review requested:

  • @nodejs/url

@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. lib / src Issues and PRs involving general changes in the lib/ or src/ directories. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. labels Aug 18, 2026
@cursor
cursorBotforce-pushed the cursor/copyfilesync-cpp-upstream-317c branch from e13ed43 to 8170ff5CompareAugust 18, 2026 12:47
Move path validation, file URL conversion, NUL checks, mode
validation, permission checks, and the copy into a dedicated
C++ binding so fs.copyFileSync() no longer goes through
getValidatedPath() in JavaScript.
VFS dispatch stays in JS and still runs before validation.
The copy itself uses uv_fs_copyfile, so flags, mode/timestamp
preservation, and UV error shapes stay the same.
Also fix FileURLToPath aborting on file URLs with a hostname
because the ERR_INVALID_FILE_URL_HOST format string lacked %s.
Signed-off-by: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
@cursor
cursorBotforce-pushed the cursor/copyfilesync-cpp-upstream-317c branch from 8170ff5 to e4dc3a1CompareAugust 18, 2026 13:11
@codecov

codecovBot commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 71.42857% with 28 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 90.12%. Comparing base (cf30b2e) to head (0fcda9b).
⚠️ Report is 69 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
src/node_file.cc70.52%10 Missing and 18 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #65376 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.11% 90.12% +0.01% 
==========================================
Files 752 752 Lines 251861 252394 +533 Branches 47365 47457 +92 ==========================================
+ Hits 226955 227478 +523 + Misses 16238 16217 -21 - Partials 8668 8699 +31 
Files with missing linesCoverage Δ
lib/fs.js98.39% <100.00%> (+0.02%)⬆️
lib/internal/fs/promises.js92.50% <100.00%> (-0.50%)⬇️
src/node_url.cc80.70% <100.00%> (+2.98%)⬆️
src/node_file.cc73.96% <70.52%> (-0.27%)⬇️

... and 69 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I don't understand this. copyFile seems already implemented in C++.

@anonrig

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

I don't understand this. copyFile seems already implemented in C++.

Except getValidatedPath @mcollina

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Then why keep both methods? Can't we just fix copyFile and update all usage of that?

Fold getValidatedPath, file URL conversion, and NUL checks into
binding.copyFile so the sync, callback, and promises paths share
one implementation. Remove the extra copyFileSync binding.
Signed-off-by: Cursor Agent <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Co-authored-by: Yagiz Nizipli <anonrig@users.noreply.github.com>
@anonrig

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina you're right — no need for a second binding.

getValidatedPath, file URL conversion, and NUL checks now live in the existing C++ copyFile. fs.copyFile, fs.copyFileSync, and fs.promises.copyFile all call that one method with the original arguments. The extra copyFileSync binding is gone.

VFS dispatch is still in JS and still runs first.

@mcollinamcollina left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Please update the PR description

@mcollinamcollina added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 21, 2026
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 21, 2026
@anonriganonrig changed the title fs: implement copyFileSync in C++fs: validate copyFile paths in the existing C++ bindingAug 21, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Comment threadsrc/node_file.cc
}

Local<String> path_string;
if (!String::NewFromUtf8(isolate,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ToV8Value?

@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@mcollinamcollina added the commit-queue-squash PRs the Commit Queue should land as one squashed commit. label Aug 21, 2026
@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The first commit needs some changes, as it does not reflect what this PR does anymore.
The second commit has metadata issues.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

c++Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++.commit-queue-squashPRs the Commit Queue should land as one squashed commit.lib / srcIssues and PRs involving general changes in the lib/ or src/ directories.needs-ciPRs that need a full CI run.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@anonrig@nodejs-github-bot@mcollina@jasnell@cursoragent