Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Fixes #7065: cli help documentation for --debug and --debug-brk - #7086
Fixes #7065: cli help documentation for --debug and --debug-brk#7086nojvek wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
| added: v6.2.0 | ||
| --> | ||
| listen for debugger commands on user specified port. If port is not specified e.g `--debug` then use 5858 as default. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Long line (80 columns max) and sentences should be properly capitalized. The version number is not correct but I don't really remember when they were added.
bnoordhuis
commented
Jun 1, 2016
I'd advise against documenting |
|
nojvek
commented
Jun 1, 2016
Debug-Brk works for 99% of use cases right? Should an edge case stop it Regarding node-debug.1 page, what should go into it? On Wednesday, June 1, 2016, Jeremiah Senkpiel notifications@github.com
|
bnoordhuis
commented
Jun 1, 2016
Yes, because how it works is almost certainly going to change. If it's documented, we risk breaking code that depends on the current behavior. |
nojvek
commented
Jun 1, 2016
makes sense. Thanks for the explanation. So the plan is to Remove debug-brk, and keep --debug right ? Once you confirm, I'll send an update to the PR. On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 8:57 AM, Ben Noordhuis notifications@github.com
|
bnoordhuis
commented
Jun 2, 2016
Yes. |
c133999 to
83c7a88Compareowenallenaz
commented
Jan 7, 2017
Looking at the referenced issue #3589 it appears that was solved and closed. With that in mind is --debug-brk still a feature that is going to be cut? I find value in the feature and was hoping to fix the cluster module to properly support it since waiting until a debugger has attached is essential for handling debugging content on start-up and I'm not aware of another way of tackling it. |
joshgav
commented
Jan 9, 2017
nojvek
commented
Jan 9, 2017
via email
This is the fairly old PR.
Not sure about current state of inspect. Is it considered stable and ready
for release?
So should I update my PR for inspect rather than debug right ? …On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 1:56 PM Josh Gavant ***@***.***> wrote:
Oh, I didn't notice this PR and added the CLI docs in the PR for
--inspect-brk: #8979 <#8979>.
@nojvek <https://github.com/nojvek> want to update the rest of the docs
to target "inspect" instead and then land? Thank you!
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#7086 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA-JVGtC9rmM0vQsQkd-B2UadcZGT0G_ks5rQq0EgaJpZM4IrEx_>
.
|
jasnell
commented
Mar 1, 2017
@nodejs/v8-inspector ... is this still needed? |
joshgav
commented
Mar 1, 2017
We don't need docs for --debug anymore, but do need to add If we want to write a man page for |
nojvek
commented
Mar 1, 2017
via email
Okay will submit separate PR. …On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 7:50 PM Josh Gavant ***@***.***> wrote:
We don't need docs for --debug anymore, but do need to add --inspect and node
inspect to the same file (./doc/api/cli.md
<https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/master/doc/api/cli.md>). @nojvek
<https://github.com/nojvek> would be great if you want to do that, I
guess in a new PR. Thank you!
If we want to write a man page for node inspect as proposed above for node
debug I think it belongs in the node-inspect repo
<https://github.com/nodejs/node-inspect>.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#7086 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA-JVIpL-3Ibjz-x-DZSF1xiPx2fr9sxks5rhOsMgaJpZM4IrEx_>
.
|
jasnell
commented
Mar 1, 2017
I assume then that it's ok to close this PR? |
Checklist
Affected core subsystem(s)
doc
Description of change
Cli documentation for --debug and --debug-brk when
node -his invoked.cc @Fishrock123