[Decision] 17 of 39 bare-root-worklist verdicts carry REFUSE-UNSPELLABLE whose definitional basis is now false — declare, re-name, or re-price?

[yinlianghui]

Raised by the domain:devx @ objectstack seat (#6023) from the #12328 dispatch, which stopped without editing anything under its own falsification clause. ⛔ This seat picks among none of these options — execution seats never adjudicate.

Split out of #12328 because that card scopes 4 rows and the measured class is 17.

What was measured

scripts/pm/bare-root-worklist.mjs defines the verdict at :109-111:

REFUSE-UNSPELLABLE — the population is a file-KIND or FILENAME filter inside the root. The subtree idiom can only say "all of it", at the precision quoted.

So the verdict asserts no precise spelling exists. #12300 (783111d252, +186/−6, all in dispatch-gates.mjs) added if (globInNonFinalSegment(hint)) return triggerCovers(hint, inputPath); ahead of the collapse. ⭐ That retirement is general, not specific to the 4 rows whose prose happens to cite the collapse. Only 5 rows cite it in prose; the definitional basis moved under 17.

Each of the 17 now has a measured, 100%-precise live spelling — driven through the real hintCovers/trackedFiles, never collapseHint alone, and cross-checked against the tree's corpus:

spelling	covers / corpus	rows held
packages/**/*.test.ts	2736 / 2736	1
packages/**/package.json · apps/**/package.json · examples/**/package.json	74/74 · 1/1 · 4/4	9
packages/**/scripts/i18n-extract.config.ts	9 / 9	3
skills/*/SKILL.md	11 / 11	1
skills/*/references/**	12 / 12	1
examples/*/objectstack.config.ts	3 / 3	1
skills/*/SKILL.md (+skills/README.md)	11 of 12 with one hint	1

Verified independently by this seat at origin/main: skills/*/references/ = 12 tracked files; the TRIAGE map holds 39 verdicts, 26 of them REFUSE-UNSPELLABLE — so a 17-row subset is arithmetically consistent.

⚠️ The contrast set matters: three refusals stay alive and correct, because ** in a non-final segment matches one or more segments, never zero. That is #12329, already open.

四维分析

① 实际业务需求. 下游拉力是实测的，但只覆盖 2 个门禁：#12310 点名 check:skill-refs，#12322 点名 check:objectql-double-limit。其余 15 行（package.json 三连、i18n 三连等）没有任何地方要求它们被命名。把 17 行全部声明出去，是在需求之前扩张能力面。

② 平台长远合理性. 这一维直接排除选项 C。让一个叫「unspellable」的裁决去描述一个 idiom 现在能精确拼出的population，等于把裁决名字变成谎言 —— 「拼不出来」退化成「我们选择不拼」。这正是本仓在消费侧一贯拒绝的容忍,只是上移了一层。台账的全部价值就是每一行都诚实。

③ 避免 AI 写代码犯错. 只有 B 的机械 pin 能关掉这个类。本次缺陷的实质是:一个裁决悄悄地不再描述这棵树,而 --self-test 全程绿着。#12347(可达性半边)与 #12330(单行机制)是两个先例 —— 都用 pin 而不是重写散文。A 单独做只修好 17 行、一个 pin 都不留,下一次推导变更会把同一个洞重新打开。

④ 创业阶段不扩散需求. 一个 PR 里跨 12 个门禁脚本写 17 处声明,正是要避免的无焦点扩张。⚠️ 而且 packages/**/*.test.ts 一行就给推导加了 2736 个文件 × 门禁。

⭐ 四维并不同向到同一个选项 —— ② 排除 C,③ 指向 B,①④ 指向「只在有拉力处声明」。这正是必须人工决裁的形状。

Options

• A. 为全部 17 行在各自门禁的 population 常量旁声明精确拼法(ROOT_DIR_WATCH_HINTS idiom),然后逐行撤销裁决。最贴近树的真相,也是 [finding] check:skill-refs can never be path-named — its declared population is three import specifiers, none of which is a repo path #12310/finding: dispatch-gates never names check:objectql-double-limit for an edited test file — the same whole-corpus shape as its listed sibling check:where-matcher #12322 要的。⚠️ 但要动约 12 个门禁脚本,远超任何单卡的申报面。并且声明并不会把行从 sweep 里清掉 —— covered() 探的是 hintCovers(h, '<root>/probe.file'),对全部 17 种拼法都是 false,所以每行仍需单独撤销裁决。
• B. 新增第四个词表值(如 SPELLABLE-UNDECLARED),记录「存在精确的活拼法;声明被推迟,理由如下」,17 行全部迁入。单文件、在申报面内、不改推导。⚠️ 风险:新值烂成 [finding] the INVISIBLE half of the bare-root species is ~33 gates, not 4 — a population literal with no separator never reaches the hint set at all #10840 点名拒绝过的 allowlist —— 除非 --self-test 把每条记录拼法的存活性与精确度按 hintCovers 的话术 pin 住,这是可机械化的,也正是 fix(pm): reprice the runner-env-posture bare-root reason on the real mechanism #12330 已经为 runner-env-posture 那行落过的形状。
• C. 裁定「活的但未命名的拼法仍不值得声明」,保留 REFUSE-UNSPELLABLE,重新定价 17 条理由。改动最小。⚠️ 但②说明它让裁决的名字变假。
• D. 拆分:15 行(无记录消费者)走 B 作词表底座,2 行(有实测下游拉力:[finding] check:skill-refs can never be path-named — its declared population is three import specifiers, none of which is a repo path #12310 → check:skill-refs,finding: dispatch-gates never names check:objectql-double-limit for an edited test file — the same whole-corpus shape as its listed sibling check:where-matcher #12322 → check:objectql-double-limit)走 A。⚠️ 需要为那两个门禁脚本另开写手位,并需一条「在 shrink-only 的 map 上重决 17 行是被授权的」裁定。

dev 的建议是 D,四维推理如上。⛔ 本座位不背书任何一个 —— 记录在此供裁决。

为什么现在必须决,不能顺手做掉

TRIAGE 是 shrink-only 的 map,而重决 17 行(全表的三分之一)是一次重新裁决,不是一次修复。#12328 的派发令、#12289 本身、以及该文件自己的 docblock 三处都把它保留给上层。dev 遇到边界就停了 —— 这是正确动作。

Refs: #12328(被拆分的卡,现 blocked) · #12289(其 row 2 属于本类) · #12300(使裁决基础失效的变更) · #12330(单行先例) · #12347(可达性半边) · #12329(存活的对照集) · #12310 · #12322(两处实测下游拉力) · #10840(B 必须避开的 allowlist 形状)