The internal dispatch runbook has no step that pastes the decision frame into the dev prompt — after #14685 item 4 (PR #14862) the dev definition expects it there and has no copy of its own #14869

Open
Open
The internal dispatch runbook has no step that pastes the decision frame into the dev prompt — after #14685 item 4 (PR #14862) the dev definition expects it there and has no copy of its own#14869

Description

@os-litant
os-litant
opened on Sep 3, 2026

Recorded by the skills lane seat (session session_01LraLgQVGq8egUwfYZpbYt1) from the #14685 item-4 flight (PR #14862, finding F5), whose dev measured it and left it alone because .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/** was outside that flight. Unassigned, bare, for triage; the landing files are governed .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/**.

What

Decision #14685 item 4 (ruled B, comment 5520452691) keeps two copies of the four-axis decision frame — internal-pm (.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md:880-897) and published-pm — and replaces the two dev-side copies with the {decision_frame} path "the dispatching PM fills at dispatch time". PR #14862 executes that: the published entry's :623 instruction now tells the published PM to paste the frame section in place of rules/dev-template.md:99's {decision_frame} line, and .claude/agents/os-dev.md:400-403 now says the frame arrives in the dispatch prompt from the PM's copy, with a stop-and-ask clause if it does not.

The internal lane has no such step. Measured at origin/main2263ca4d67 (2026-09-03T06:17Z): {decision_frame} occurs only under skills/objectstack-pm-dispatch/; .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/dispatch-runbook.md § 派发词构造细则 (:221 onward) constructs the internal dispatch prompt and never names the frame; .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md's dispatch step does not either. Once PR #14862 lands, an internal dev whose PM did not paste the frame has no frame — the stop-and-ask clause fails loud rather than silent, which is the right failure, but it costs a round-trip per dispatch until the runbook says to paste.

Why it matters

The frame is binding text for every escalation (needs_decision analysis on four axes, long-term soundness ≥ 50%). Before #14862 every dev carried it in its own definition; after, the internal PM is the only source. A runbook that does not say so is an instruction surface promising a behaviour it no longer produces — the same shape #14017 / #14031 fenced for the "report before acting" form.

Scope (shrink-or-neutral under the line ratchet)

  • references/dispatch-runbook.md § 派发词构造细则: one bullet — every dispatch prompt carries the internal-pm frame section (SKILL.md每个方案必须沿四条固定评估轴… through 推荐意见必须基于这四条轴给出理由…) verbatim, pasted from the PM's own copy, never retyped; the dev definition stops and asks if it is missing.
  • Budget: dispatch-runbook.md is at its ceiling (280/280). Pay by a same-file deletion, or by the cross-file move rule PR tooling(pm): admit a same-PR cross-file line-budget move, and take the first one #14860 introduces (Restart-when: that PR is on main); ⛔ no ceiling raise otherwise, ⛔ no re-wrap funding.
  • ⛔ Do not add a third copy of the frame anywhere — the anti-dormancy scan in scripts/check-skill-frame-sync.mjs refuses one in an undeclared file, and the instruction points at the existing copy by its anchor sentences.
  • Interim, already in force: the skills seat's own briefs carry the frame from 2026-09-03T06:19Z (condition recorded on the item-4 review, comment 5521428238).

Verified

Refs: #14685 (item 4, ruled B) · PR #14862 · PR #14860 (the payment path) · #13597 (corpus audit Phase 3).

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all 
       blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

      Skip to content
      The internal dispatch runbook has no step that pastes the decision frame into the dev prompt — after #14685 item 4 (PR #14862) the dev definition expects it there and has no copy of its own #14869
      Open
      Open
      The internal dispatch runbook has no step that pastes the decision frame into the dev prompt — after #14685 item 4 (PR #14862) the dev definition expects it there and has no copy of its own#14869
      Description
      @os-litant
      os-litant
      opened on Sep 3, 2026
      Recorded by the skills lane seat (session session_01LraLgQVGq8egUwfYZpbYt1) from the #14685 item-4 flight (PR #14862, finding F5), whose dev measured it and left it alone because .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/** was outside that flight. Unassigned, bare, for triage; the landing files are governed .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/**.
      What
      Decision #14685 item 4 (ruled B, comment 5520452691) keeps two copies of the four-axis decision frame — internal-pm (.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md:880-897) and published-pm — and replaces the two dev-side copies with the {decision_frame} path "the dispatching PM fills at dispatch time". PR #14862 executes that: the published entry's :623 instruction now tells the published PM to paste the frame section in place of rules/dev-template.md:99's {decision_frame} line, and .claude/agents/os-dev.md:400-403 now says the frame arrives in the dispatch prompt from the PM's copy, with a stop-and-ask clause if it does not.
      The internal lane has no such step. Measured at origin/main2263ca4d67 (2026-09-03T06:17Z): {decision_frame} occurs only under skills/objectstack-pm-dispatch/; .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/dispatch-runbook.md § 派发词构造细则 (:221 onward) constructs the internal dispatch prompt and never names the frame; .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md's dispatch step does not either. Once PR #14862 lands, an internal dev whose PM did not paste the frame has no frame — the stop-and-ask clause fails loud rather than silent, which is the right failure, but it costs a round-trip per dispatch until the runbook says to paste.
      Why it matters
      The frame is binding text for every escalation (needs_decision analysis on four axes, long-term soundness ≥ 50%). Before #14862 every dev carried it in its own definition; after, the internal PM is the only source. A runbook that does not say so is an instruction surface promising a behaviour it no longer produces — the same shape #14017 / #14031 fenced for the "report before acting" form.
      Scope (shrink-or-neutral under the line ratchet)
      • references/dispatch-runbook.md § 派发词构造细则: one bullet — every dispatch prompt carries the internal-pm frame section (SKILL.md每个方案必须沿四条固定评估轴… through 推荐意见必须基于这四条轴给出理由…) verbatim, pasted from the PM's own copy, never retyped; the dev definition stops and asks if it is missing.
      • Budget: dispatch-runbook.md is at its ceiling (280/280). Pay by a same-file deletion, or by the cross-file move rule PR tooling(pm): admit a same-PR cross-file line-budget move, and take the first one #14860 introduces (Restart-when: that PR is on main); ⛔ no ceiling raise otherwise, ⛔ no re-wrap funding.
      • ⛔ Do not add a third copy of the frame anywhere — the anti-dormancy scan in scripts/check-skill-frame-sync.mjs refuses one in an undeclared file, and the instruction points at the existing copy by its anchor sentences.
      • Interim, already in force: the skills seat's own briefs carry the frame from 2026-09-03T06:19Z (condition recorded on the item-4 review, comment 5521428238).
      Verified
      Refs: #14685 (item 4, ruled B) · PR #14862 · PR #14860 (the payment path) · #13597 (corpus audit Phase 3).
      Activity
      Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
      Metadata
      Metadata
      Assignees
      No one assigned
        Labels
        No labels
        No labels
        Type
        No type
        Projects
        No projects
          Milestone
          No milestone
          Relationships
          None yet
          Development
          No branches or pull requests
          Issue actions
          
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

          Skip to content
          The internal dispatch runbook has no step that pastes the decision frame into the dev prompt — after #14685 item 4 (PR #14862) the dev definition expects it there and has no copy of its own #14869
          Open
          Open
          The internal dispatch runbook has no step that pastes the decision frame into the dev prompt — after #14685 item 4 (PR #14862) the dev definition expects it there and has no copy of its own#14869
          Description
          @os-litant
          os-litant
          opened on Sep 3, 2026
          Recorded by the skills lane seat (session session_01LraLgQVGq8egUwfYZpbYt1) from the #14685 item-4 flight (PR #14862, finding F5), whose dev measured it and left it alone because .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/** was outside that flight. Unassigned, bare, for triage; the landing files are governed .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/**.
          What
          Decision #14685 item 4 (ruled B, comment 5520452691) keeps two copies of the four-axis decision frame — internal-pm (.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md:880-897) and published-pm — and replaces the two dev-side copies with the {decision_frame} path "the dispatching PM fills at dispatch time". PR #14862 executes that: the published entry's :623 instruction now tells the published PM to paste the frame section in place of rules/dev-template.md:99's {decision_frame} line, and .claude/agents/os-dev.md:400-403 now says the frame arrives in the dispatch prompt from the PM's copy, with a stop-and-ask clause if it does not.
          The internal lane has no such step. Measured at origin/main2263ca4d67 (2026-09-03T06:17Z): {decision_frame} occurs only under skills/objectstack-pm-dispatch/; .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/dispatch-runbook.md § 派发词构造细则 (:221 onward) constructs the internal dispatch prompt and never names the frame; .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md's dispatch step does not either. Once PR #14862 lands, an internal dev whose PM did not paste the frame has no frame — the stop-and-ask clause fails loud rather than silent, which is the right failure, but it costs a round-trip per dispatch until the runbook says to paste.
          Why it matters
          The frame is binding text for every escalation (needs_decision analysis on four axes, long-term soundness ≥ 50%). Before #14862 every dev carried it in its own definition; after, the internal PM is the only source. A runbook that does not say so is an instruction surface promising a behaviour it no longer produces — the same shape #14017 / #14031 fenced for the "report before acting" form.
          Scope (shrink-or-neutral under the line ratchet)
          • references/dispatch-runbook.md § 派发词构造细则: one bullet — every dispatch prompt carries the internal-pm frame section (SKILL.md每个方案必须沿四条固定评估轴… through 推荐意见必须基于这四条轴给出理由…) verbatim, pasted from the PM's own copy, never retyped; the dev definition stops and asks if it is missing.
          • Budget: dispatch-runbook.md is at its ceiling (280/280). Pay by a same-file deletion, or by the cross-file move rule PR tooling(pm): admit a same-PR cross-file line-budget move, and take the first one #14860 introduces (Restart-when: that PR is on main); ⛔ no ceiling raise otherwise, ⛔ no re-wrap funding.
          • ⛔ Do not add a third copy of the frame anywhere — the anti-dormancy scan in scripts/check-skill-frame-sync.mjs refuses one in an undeclared file, and the instruction points at the existing copy by its anchor sentences.
          • Interim, already in force: the skills seat's own briefs carry the frame from 2026-09-03T06:19Z (condition recorded on the item-4 review, comment 5521428238).
          Verified
          Refs: #14685 (item 4, ruled B) · PR #14862 · PR #14860 (the payment path) · #13597 (corpus audit Phase 3).
          Activity
          Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
          Metadata
          Metadata
          Assignees
          No one assigned
            Labels
            No labels
            No labels
            Type
            No type
            Projects
            No projects
              Milestone
              No milestone
              Relationships
              None yet
              Development
              No branches or pull requests
              Issue actions
              
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

              Skip to content
              The internal dispatch runbook has no step that pastes the decision frame into the dev prompt — after #14685 item 4 (PR #14862) the dev definition expects it there and has no copy of its own #14869
              Open
              Open
              The internal dispatch runbook has no step that pastes the decision frame into the dev prompt — after #14685 item 4 (PR #14862) the dev definition expects it there and has no copy of its own#14869
              Description
              @os-litant
              os-litant
              opened on Sep 3, 2026
              Recorded by the skills lane seat (session session_01LraLgQVGq8egUwfYZpbYt1) from the #14685 item-4 flight (PR #14862, finding F5), whose dev measured it and left it alone because .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/** was outside that flight. Unassigned, bare, for triage; the landing files are governed .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/**.
              What
              Decision #14685 item 4 (ruled B, comment 5520452691) keeps two copies of the four-axis decision frame — internal-pm (.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md:880-897) and published-pm — and replaces the two dev-side copies with the {decision_frame} path "the dispatching PM fills at dispatch time". PR #14862 executes that: the published entry's :623 instruction now tells the published PM to paste the frame section in place of rules/dev-template.md:99's {decision_frame} line, and .claude/agents/os-dev.md:400-403 now says the frame arrives in the dispatch prompt from the PM's copy, with a stop-and-ask clause if it does not.
              The internal lane has no such step. Measured at origin/main2263ca4d67 (2026-09-03T06:17Z): {decision_frame} occurs only under skills/objectstack-pm-dispatch/; .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/dispatch-runbook.md § 派发词构造细则 (:221 onward) constructs the internal dispatch prompt and never names the frame; .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md's dispatch step does not either. Once PR #14862 lands, an internal dev whose PM did not paste the frame has no frame — the stop-and-ask clause fails loud rather than silent, which is the right failure, but it costs a round-trip per dispatch until the runbook says to paste.
              Why it matters
              The frame is binding text for every escalation (needs_decision analysis on four axes, long-term soundness ≥ 50%). Before #14862 every dev carried it in its own definition; after, the internal PM is the only source. A runbook that does not say so is an instruction surface promising a behaviour it no longer produces — the same shape #14017 / #14031 fenced for the "report before acting" form.
              Scope (shrink-or-neutral under the line ratchet)
              • references/dispatch-runbook.md § 派发词构造细则: one bullet — every dispatch prompt carries the internal-pm frame section (SKILL.md每个方案必须沿四条固定评估轴… through 推荐意见必须基于这四条轴给出理由…) verbatim, pasted from the PM's own copy, never retyped; the dev definition stops and asks if it is missing.
              • Budget: dispatch-runbook.md is at its ceiling (280/280). Pay by a same-file deletion, or by the cross-file move rule PR tooling(pm): admit a same-PR cross-file line-budget move, and take the first one #14860 introduces (Restart-when: that PR is on main); ⛔ no ceiling raise otherwise, ⛔ no re-wrap funding.
              • ⛔ Do not add a third copy of the frame anywhere — the anti-dormancy scan in scripts/check-skill-frame-sync.mjs refuses one in an undeclared file, and the instruction points at the existing copy by its anchor sentences.
              • Interim, already in force: the skills seat's own briefs carry the frame from 2026-09-03T06:19Z (condition recorded on the item-4 review, comment 5521428238).
              Verified
              Refs: #14685 (item 4, ruled B) · PR #14862 · PR #14860 (the payment path) · #13597 (corpus audit Phase 3).
              Activity
              Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
              Metadata
              Metadata
              Assignees
              No one assigned
                Labels
                No labels
                No labels
                Type
                No type
                Projects
                No projects
                  Milestone
                  No milestone
                  Relationships
                  None yet
                  Development
                  No branches or pull requests
                  Issue actions
                  
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

                  Skip to content
                  The internal dispatch runbook has no step that pastes the decision frame into the dev prompt — after #14685 item 4 (PR #14862) the dev definition expects it there and has no copy of its own #14869
                  Open
                  Open
                  The internal dispatch runbook has no step that pastes the decision frame into the dev prompt — after #14685 item 4 (PR #14862) the dev definition expects it there and has no copy of its own#14869
                  Description
                  @os-litant
                  os-litant
                  opened on Sep 3, 2026
                  Recorded by the skills lane seat (session session_01LraLgQVGq8egUwfYZpbYt1) from the #14685 item-4 flight (PR #14862, finding F5), whose dev measured it and left it alone because .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/** was outside that flight. Unassigned, bare, for triage; the landing files are governed .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/**.
                  What
                  Decision #14685 item 4 (ruled B, comment 5520452691) keeps two copies of the four-axis decision frame — internal-pm (.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md:880-897) and published-pm — and replaces the two dev-side copies with the {decision_frame} path "the dispatching PM fills at dispatch time". PR #14862 executes that: the published entry's :623 instruction now tells the published PM to paste the frame section in place of rules/dev-template.md:99's {decision_frame} line, and .claude/agents/os-dev.md:400-403 now says the frame arrives in the dispatch prompt from the PM's copy, with a stop-and-ask clause if it does not.
                  The internal lane has no such step. Measured at origin/main2263ca4d67 (2026-09-03T06:17Z): {decision_frame} occurs only under skills/objectstack-pm-dispatch/; .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/dispatch-runbook.md § 派发词构造细则 (:221 onward) constructs the internal dispatch prompt and never names the frame; .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md's dispatch step does not either. Once PR #14862 lands, an internal dev whose PM did not paste the frame has no frame — the stop-and-ask clause fails loud rather than silent, which is the right failure, but it costs a round-trip per dispatch until the runbook says to paste.
                  Why it matters
                  The frame is binding text for every escalation (needs_decision analysis on four axes, long-term soundness ≥ 50%). Before #14862 every dev carried it in its own definition; after, the internal PM is the only source. A runbook that does not say so is an instruction surface promising a behaviour it no longer produces — the same shape #14017 / #14031 fenced for the "report before acting" form.
                  Scope (shrink-or-neutral under the line ratchet)
                  • references/dispatch-runbook.md § 派发词构造细则: one bullet — every dispatch prompt carries the internal-pm frame section (SKILL.md每个方案必须沿四条固定评估轴… through 推荐意见必须基于这四条轴给出理由…) verbatim, pasted from the PM's own copy, never retyped; the dev definition stops and asks if it is missing.
                  • Budget: dispatch-runbook.md is at its ceiling (280/280). Pay by a same-file deletion, or by the cross-file move rule PR tooling(pm): admit a same-PR cross-file line-budget move, and take the first one #14860 introduces (Restart-when: that PR is on main); ⛔ no ceiling raise otherwise, ⛔ no re-wrap funding.
                  • ⛔ Do not add a third copy of the frame anywhere — the anti-dormancy scan in scripts/check-skill-frame-sync.mjs refuses one in an undeclared file, and the instruction points at the existing copy by its anchor sentences.
                  • Interim, already in force: the skills seat's own briefs carry the frame from 2026-09-03T06:19Z (condition recorded on the item-4 review, comment 5521428238).
                  Verified
                  Refs: #14685 (item 4, ruled B) · PR #14862 · PR #14860 (the payment path) · #13597 (corpus audit Phase 3).
                  Activity
                  Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
                  Metadata
                  Metadata
                  Assignees
                  No one assigned
                    Labels
                    No labels
                    No labels
                    Type
                    No type
                    Projects
                    No projects
                      Milestone
                      No milestone
                      Relationships
                      None yet
                      Development
                      No branches or pull requests
                      Issue actions
                      
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

                      Skip to content
                      The internal dispatch runbook has no step that pastes the decision frame into the dev prompt — after #14685 item 4 (PR #14862) the dev definition expects it there and has no copy of its own #14869
                      Open
                      Open
                      The internal dispatch runbook has no step that pastes the decision frame into the dev prompt — after #14685 item 4 (PR #14862) the dev definition expects it there and has no copy of its own#14869
                      Description
                      @os-litant
                      os-litant
                      opened on Sep 3, 2026
                      Recorded by the skills lane seat (session session_01LraLgQVGq8egUwfYZpbYt1) from the #14685 item-4 flight (PR #14862, finding F5), whose dev measured it and left it alone because .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/** was outside that flight. Unassigned, bare, for triage; the landing files are governed .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/**.
                      What
                      Decision #14685 item 4 (ruled B, comment 5520452691) keeps two copies of the four-axis decision frame — internal-pm (.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md:880-897) and published-pm — and replaces the two dev-side copies with the {decision_frame} path "the dispatching PM fills at dispatch time". PR #14862 executes that: the published entry's :623 instruction now tells the published PM to paste the frame section in place of rules/dev-template.md:99's {decision_frame} line, and .claude/agents/os-dev.md:400-403 now says the frame arrives in the dispatch prompt from the PM's copy, with a stop-and-ask clause if it does not.
                      The internal lane has no such step. Measured at origin/main2263ca4d67 (2026-09-03T06:17Z): {decision_frame} occurs only under skills/objectstack-pm-dispatch/; .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/dispatch-runbook.md § 派发词构造细则 (:221 onward) constructs the internal dispatch prompt and never names the frame; .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md's dispatch step does not either. Once PR #14862 lands, an internal dev whose PM did not paste the frame has no frame — the stop-and-ask clause fails loud rather than silent, which is the right failure, but it costs a round-trip per dispatch until the runbook says to paste.
                      Why it matters
                      The frame is binding text for every escalation (needs_decision analysis on four axes, long-term soundness ≥ 50%). Before #14862 every dev carried it in its own definition; after, the internal PM is the only source. A runbook that does not say so is an instruction surface promising a behaviour it no longer produces — the same shape #14017 / #14031 fenced for the "report before acting" form.
                      Scope (shrink-or-neutral under the line ratchet)
                      • references/dispatch-runbook.md § 派发词构造细则: one bullet — every dispatch prompt carries the internal-pm frame section (SKILL.md每个方案必须沿四条固定评估轴… through 推荐意见必须基于这四条轴给出理由…) verbatim, pasted from the PM's own copy, never retyped; the dev definition stops and asks if it is missing.
                      • Budget: dispatch-runbook.md is at its ceiling (280/280). Pay by a same-file deletion, or by the cross-file move rule PR tooling(pm): admit a same-PR cross-file line-budget move, and take the first one #14860 introduces (Restart-when: that PR is on main); ⛔ no ceiling raise otherwise, ⛔ no re-wrap funding.
                      • ⛔ Do not add a third copy of the frame anywhere — the anti-dormancy scan in scripts/check-skill-frame-sync.mjs refuses one in an undeclared file, and the instruction points at the existing copy by its anchor sentences.
                      • Interim, already in force: the skills seat's own briefs carry the frame from 2026-09-03T06:19Z (condition recorded on the item-4 review, comment 5521428238).
                      Verified
                      Refs: #14685 (item 4, ruled B) · PR #14862 · PR #14860 (the payment path) · #13597 (corpus audit Phase 3).
                      Activity
                      Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
                      Metadata
                      Metadata
                      Assignees
                      No one assigned
                        Labels
                        No labels
                        No labels
                        Type
                        No type
                        Projects
                        No projects
                          Milestone
                          No milestone
                          Relationships
                          None yet
                          Development
                          No branches or pull requests
                          Issue actions
                          
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

                          Skip to content
                          The internal dispatch runbook has no step that pastes the decision frame into the dev prompt — after #14685 item 4 (PR #14862) the dev definition expects it there and has no copy of its own #14869
                          Open
                          Open
                          The internal dispatch runbook has no step that pastes the decision frame into the dev prompt — after #14685 item 4 (PR #14862) the dev definition expects it there and has no copy of its own#14869
                          Description
                          @os-litant
                          os-litant
                          opened on Sep 3, 2026
                          Recorded by the skills lane seat (session session_01LraLgQVGq8egUwfYZpbYt1) from the #14685 item-4 flight (PR #14862, finding F5), whose dev measured it and left it alone because .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/** was outside that flight. Unassigned, bare, for triage; the landing files are governed .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/**.
                          What
                          Decision #14685 item 4 (ruled B, comment 5520452691) keeps two copies of the four-axis decision frame — internal-pm (.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md:880-897) and published-pm — and replaces the two dev-side copies with the {decision_frame} path "the dispatching PM fills at dispatch time". PR #14862 executes that: the published entry's :623 instruction now tells the published PM to paste the frame section in place of rules/dev-template.md:99's {decision_frame} line, and .claude/agents/os-dev.md:400-403 now says the frame arrives in the dispatch prompt from the PM's copy, with a stop-and-ask clause if it does not.
                          The internal lane has no such step. Measured at origin/main2263ca4d67 (2026-09-03T06:17Z): {decision_frame} occurs only under skills/objectstack-pm-dispatch/; .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/dispatch-runbook.md § 派发词构造细则 (:221 onward) constructs the internal dispatch prompt and never names the frame; .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md's dispatch step does not either. Once PR #14862 lands, an internal dev whose PM did not paste the frame has no frame — the stop-and-ask clause fails loud rather than silent, which is the right failure, but it costs a round-trip per dispatch until the runbook says to paste.
                          Why it matters
                          The frame is binding text for every escalation (needs_decision analysis on four axes, long-term soundness ≥ 50%). Before #14862 every dev carried it in its own definition; after, the internal PM is the only source. A runbook that does not say so is an instruction surface promising a behaviour it no longer produces — the same shape #14017 / #14031 fenced for the "report before acting" form.
                          Scope (shrink-or-neutral under the line ratchet)
                          • references/dispatch-runbook.md § 派发词构造细则: one bullet — every dispatch prompt carries the internal-pm frame section (SKILL.md每个方案必须沿四条固定评估轴… through 推荐意见必须基于这四条轴给出理由…) verbatim, pasted from the PM's own copy, never retyped; the dev definition stops and asks if it is missing.
                          • Budget: dispatch-runbook.md is at its ceiling (280/280). Pay by a same-file deletion, or by the cross-file move rule PR tooling(pm): admit a same-PR cross-file line-budget move, and take the first one #14860 introduces (Restart-when: that PR is on main); ⛔ no ceiling raise otherwise, ⛔ no re-wrap funding.
                          • ⛔ Do not add a third copy of the frame anywhere — the anti-dormancy scan in scripts/check-skill-frame-sync.mjs refuses one in an undeclared file, and the instruction points at the existing copy by its anchor sentences.
                          • Interim, already in force: the skills seat's own briefs carry the frame from 2026-09-03T06:19Z (condition recorded on the item-4 review, comment 5521428238).
                          Verified
                          Refs: #14685 (item 4, ruled B) · PR #14862 · PR #14860 (the payment path) · #13597 (corpus audit Phase 3).
                          Activity
                          Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
                          Metadata
                          Metadata
                          Assignees
                          No one assigned
                            Labels
                            No labels
                            No labels
                            Type
                            No type
                            Projects
                            No projects
                              Milestone
                              No milestone
                              Relationships
                              None yet
                              Development
                              No branches or pull requests
                              Issue actions
                              
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

                              Skip to content
                              The internal dispatch runbook has no step that pastes the decision frame into the dev prompt — after #14685 item 4 (PR #14862) the dev definition expects it there and has no copy of its own #14869
                              Open
                              Open
                              The internal dispatch runbook has no step that pastes the decision frame into the dev prompt — after #14685 item 4 (PR #14862) the dev definition expects it there and has no copy of its own#14869
                              Description
                              @os-litant
                              os-litant
                              opened on Sep 3, 2026
                              Recorded by the skills lane seat (session session_01LraLgQVGq8egUwfYZpbYt1) from the #14685 item-4 flight (PR #14862, finding F5), whose dev measured it and left it alone because .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/** was outside that flight. Unassigned, bare, for triage; the landing files are governed .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/**.
                              What
                              Decision #14685 item 4 (ruled B, comment 5520452691) keeps two copies of the four-axis decision frame — internal-pm (.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md:880-897) and published-pm — and replaces the two dev-side copies with the {decision_frame} path "the dispatching PM fills at dispatch time". PR #14862 executes that: the published entry's :623 instruction now tells the published PM to paste the frame section in place of rules/dev-template.md:99's {decision_frame} line, and .claude/agents/os-dev.md:400-403 now says the frame arrives in the dispatch prompt from the PM's copy, with a stop-and-ask clause if it does not.
                              The internal lane has no such step. Measured at origin/main2263ca4d67 (2026-09-03T06:17Z): {decision_frame} occurs only under skills/objectstack-pm-dispatch/; .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/dispatch-runbook.md § 派发词构造细则 (:221 onward) constructs the internal dispatch prompt and never names the frame; .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md's dispatch step does not either. Once PR #14862 lands, an internal dev whose PM did not paste the frame has no frame — the stop-and-ask clause fails loud rather than silent, which is the right failure, but it costs a round-trip per dispatch until the runbook says to paste.
                              Why it matters
                              The frame is binding text for every escalation (needs_decision analysis on four axes, long-term soundness ≥ 50%). Before #14862 every dev carried it in its own definition; after, the internal PM is the only source. A runbook that does not say so is an instruction surface promising a behaviour it no longer produces — the same shape #14017 / #14031 fenced for the "report before acting" form.
                              Scope (shrink-or-neutral under the line ratchet)
                              • references/dispatch-runbook.md § 派发词构造细则: one bullet — every dispatch prompt carries the internal-pm frame section (SKILL.md每个方案必须沿四条固定评估轴… through 推荐意见必须基于这四条轴给出理由…) verbatim, pasted from the PM's own copy, never retyped; the dev definition stops and asks if it is missing.
                              • Budget: dispatch-runbook.md is at its ceiling (280/280). Pay by a same-file deletion, or by the cross-file move rule PR tooling(pm): admit a same-PR cross-file line-budget move, and take the first one #14860 introduces (Restart-when: that PR is on main); ⛔ no ceiling raise otherwise, ⛔ no re-wrap funding.
                              • ⛔ Do not add a third copy of the frame anywhere — the anti-dormancy scan in scripts/check-skill-frame-sync.mjs refuses one in an undeclared file, and the instruction points at the existing copy by its anchor sentences.
                              • Interim, already in force: the skills seat's own briefs carry the frame from 2026-09-03T06:19Z (condition recorded on the item-4 review, comment 5521428238).
                              Verified
                              Refs: #14685 (item 4, ruled B) · PR #14862 · PR #14860 (the payment path) · #13597 (corpus audit Phase 3).
                              Activity
                              Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
                              Metadata
                              Metadata
                              Assignees
                              No one assigned
                                Labels
                                No labels
                                No labels
                                Type
                                No type
                                Projects
                                No projects
                                  Milestone
                                  No milestone
                                  Relationships
                                  None yet
                                  Development
                                  No branches or pull requests
                                  Issue actions