Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
docs(devx): re-point authorization.mdx ADR cite to ADR-0066 D1 - #8437
Merged
Conversation
ADR-0094 D5 is RETIRED and never discussed capability declaration or
managed_by-guessing back-doors in the first place; the claim being made
("retire the implicit managed_by-guessing back-doors in favour of
explicit, attributable declarations") is ADR-0066 D1's own direction.
Part of #8386
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Jqe56GnYFddggeAyfkZFVzThe latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub. 1 Skipped Deployment
|
This was referenced Aug 13, 2026
qq9340100
marked this pull request as ready for review
August 13, 2026 13:28
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This was referenced Aug 13, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Part of #8386
content/docs/permissions/authorization.mdx:190cited "ADR-0094 D5" for the"retire the implicit
managed_by-guessing back-doors in favour of explicit,attributable declarations" direction. ADR-0094 D5 ("Env-scope overlays of
package-owned sets are FIRST-CLASS customizations") never discusses
capabilities, placeholder derivation, or back-doors at all — a
grep -ni "capabilit\|guess\|back-door"over its body (lines 197-236) returns no hits —and it is now RETIRED (#6858 / PR #6962), so the cite sent readers to a
section headed
RETIRED 2026-08-09.The claim is real and correct — it is ADR-0066 D1's own direction (the
capability registry decision: "This retires the implicit back-door where a
capability existed only as an untitled placeholder derived from a permission
set's
systemPermissions[]… DEFINE/GRANT/REQUIRE stay decoupled"). This PRre-points the citation to ADR-0066 D1. One sentence changed, no other prose
touched.
#8386 is not addressed herefor its ADR half —docs/adr/0066-*.md:45carries the same wrong cite and lands separately as an ADR-class,
maintainer-merged draft PR (two-PR split per the #8290/#8291 /
#8384/#8385 precedent).
Tests
Local gates (scoped, per repo convention — CI runs the full farm):
pnpm check:docs-audit-scope— passpnpm check:quick-reference-counts— passpnpm check:role-word— passpnpm --filter @objectstack/lint run check:doc-formula-expressions— pass (builtpackages/spec+packages/formulafirst)pnpm check:nul-bytes— passnode scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs content/docs/permissions/authorization.mdx— re-derived; surfaces exactly the four families above, no additionGenerated by Claude Code
Generated by Claude Code