Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
docs(pm): bind hold discharge to the most recent transition comment; refuse when newer merged PRs exist - #9855
Merged
Conversation
…nd refuse on newer merged PRs Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01AeA3nU1B5Q2pgxqxgUrexd
os-warren
marked this pull request as ready for review
August 19, 2026 05:44
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes#9315
What
Adds the two-part mechanical discharge guard (per the dispatch ruling) to the hold/unlock discipline in
.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md:pm:on-hold/pm:blockedtransition comment on the card — never any earlier blocker named in the thread (a condition already discharged is spent; re-firing it restores a stale premise as current).Both halves are judgment-free checks, stated as such in the rule text.
Home choice (ruling allowed row ~77 or the daily-batch text ~293 — single home)
Landed in the
pm:on-holdstate-model row (the ~77 row), extended in place, because: (a) the discharge-fire mechanics already live in that row's parenthetical (the unlock-scan fire channel), so the vintage binding continues the same sentence; (b) the daily-batch text explicitly defers to the state model for hold-comment discipline, so the state model is where its own cross-reference already points; (c) an in-row extension adds zero lines against a headroom-1 ratchet — no re-wrap, no forced deletion.Not duplicated anywhere else; no changes outside the one row.
Line budget
SKILL.md: 681 lines before → 681 after (ceiling 682, headroom 1 preserved).
Gates (all at 174a366, the PR head)
Derived by
node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs(no paths; change set from merge base55d29935b): 7 families matched, all run, all green —check:pm-skill-ratchet(verdict: "SKILL.md is 681 lines (ceiling 682; headroom 1)"),check:pm-skill-id-lint("9 file(s) clean"),check:doc-authoring("377 files clean"),check:pm-governed-merges(77 self-test assertions),check:pm-governed-prose("2 instruction surface(s) name all 5 registered governed surfaces"),check:skill-frame-sync("4 copies of the decision frame are structurally isomorphic"),check:doc-formula-expressions("1413 TS blocks judged clean"). Pluscheck:nul-bytes("no raw ASCII control bytes").Governance
.claude/skills/**is a governed surface (Prime Directive #14): this PR opens draft and stays draft — a human merges it. No changeset (repo-internal agent instruction file; nothing publishes).Generated by Claude Code