Skip to content

SPLAT-2044 - [vsphere] promote multi-nic to default - #2204

Merged
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit into
openshift:masterfrom
rvanderp3:SPLAT-2044
May 27, 2025
Merged

SPLAT-2044 - [vsphere] promote multi-nic to default#2204
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit into
openshift:masterfrom
rvanderp3:SPLAT-2044

Conversation

@rvanderp3

@rvanderp3rvanderp3 commented Feb 17, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@openshift-ci

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hello @rvanderp3! Some important instructions when contributing to openshift/api:
API design plays an important part in the user experience of OpenShift and as such API PRs are subject to a high level of scrutiny to ensure they follow our best practices. If you haven't already done so, please review the OpenShift API Conventions and ensure that your proposed changes are compliant. Following these conventions will help expedite the api review process for your PR.

@openshift-ciopenshift-ciBot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 17, 2025
@JoelSpeed

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

For the most part, the associated PRs you have raised are likely not needed. Enabling the gate in this repo will allow the MAO and CPMS to pick up the gate change using their gate observers. There's nothing I can think of in client-go or library-go that would require vendoring this change for a gate promotion either.

The installer PR is likely needed though

@rvanderp3

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

For the most part, the associated PRs you have raised are likely not needed. Enabling the gate in this repo will allow the MAO and CPMS to pick up the gate change using their gate observers. There's nothing I can think of in client-go or library-go that would require vendoring this change for a gate promotion either.

The installer PR is likely needed though

Thanks @JoelSpeed for taking a look. I wasn't sure how that feature gate change would propagate. That certainly simplifies things.

@openshift-ci

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@rvanderp3: This PR was included in a payload test run from openshift/installer#9493
trigger 0 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

1 similar comment
@openshift-ci

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@rvanderp3: This PR was included in a payload test run from openshift/installer#9493
trigger 0 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

@openshift-ci

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@rvanderp3: This PR was included in a payload test run from openshift/installer#9493
trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.19-e2e-vsphere-ovn-multi-network

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/e63e99d0-1091-11f0-815a-95d1230ecb0a-0

@openshift-ci

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@rvanderp3: This PR was included in a payload test run from openshift/installer#9493
trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.19-e2e-vsphere-ovn-multi-network

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/659390a0-10b5-11f0-8279-b4f2deeb2bab-0

@rvanderp3

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

/test verify-feature-promotion

@jcpowermac

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ciopenshift-ciBot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 10, 2025
@JoelSpeed

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@rvanderp3 Where are we at in terms of testing this feature? Do we have specific testing or is an "if it installs, it works" kind of feature, and if that's the case, can you explain what jobs we have in place?

@WenXinWei

Copy link
Copy Markdown

/lgtm

@WenXinWei

Copy link
Copy Markdown

/approve

@rvanderp3

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@rvanderp3 Where are we at in terms of testing this feature? Do we have specific testing or is an "if it installs, it works" kind of feature, and if that's the case, can you explain what jobs we have in place?

Hi @JoelSpeed we've been working on two approaches in case we run out of time:

  1. Adding additional e2e tests - OCPBUGS-49351: Added vSphere check for max networks machine-api-operator#1327
  2. QE is testing(has tested; thanks @WenXinWei !) this as well in the event we need an exception

We did have an excellent pass rate for the tech preview job, but for some reason(must have been me :( ) its not showing up in prow. I'm investigating that.

@rvanderp3

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@rvanderp3 Where are we at in terms of testing this feature? Do we have specific testing or is an "if it installs, it works" kind of feature, and if that's the case, can you explain what jobs we have in place?

Hi @JoelSpeed we've been working on two approaches in case we run out of time:

1. Adding additional e2e tests - [OCPBUGS-49351: Added vSphere check for max networks machine-api-operator#1327](https://github.com/openshift/machine-api-operator/pull/1327)
2. QE is testing(has tested; thanks @WenXinWei !) this as well in the event we need an exception

We did have an excellent pass rate for the tech preview job, but for some reason(must have been me :( ) its not showing up in prow. I'm investigating that.

me--

https://github.com/openshift/release/pull/63351/files#diff-7ce8489656df8d956c50ed7923f223cabe266e2146255f892fd3f980ba664e20R485-R506

getting a fix in now. i swapped the crons eroneously

@rvanderp3

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

/assign @JoelSpeed

@JoelSpeed

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Without tests reporting into sippy, we run the risk of not catching regressions in the features we support. As far as I can tell, there are currently no tests for this gate reporting into sippy.

Do you have both tech preview and stable periodics set up that are testing this feature already?

@rvanderp3

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Without tests reporting into sippy, we run the risk of not catching regressions in the features we support. As far as I can tell, there are currently no tests for this gate reporting into sippy.

Do you have both tech preview and stable periodics set up that are testing this feature already?

Correct, that is why we had QE test it last week. I am working on getting the tests reported in to Sippy(https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.19-e2e-vsphere-ovn-multi-network-techpreview/1911775910613225472) but until last week, we didnt have the framework merged to run those tests. I'm working on fixing the test preview tests at the moment.

@rvanderp3

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Without tests reporting into sippy, we run the risk of not catching regressions in the features we support. As far as I can tell, there are currently no tests for this gate reporting into sippy.
Do you have both tech preview and stable periodics set up that are testing this feature already?

Correct, that is why we had QE test it last week. I am working on getting the tests reported in to Sippy(https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.19-e2e-vsphere-ovn-multi-network-techpreview/1911775910613225472) but until last week, we didnt have the framework merged to run those tests. I'm working on fixing the test preview tests at the moment.

looks like my test is running with CustomNoUpgrade rather than TechPreview. fixing that now.

@rvanderp3

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@JoelSpeed tech preview periodics have been fixed https://prow.ci.openshift.org/job-history/gs/test-platform-results/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.19-e2e-vsphere-ovn-multi-network-techpreview. I'm trying to retrieve payload test results but it appears pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org may be having issues. Will try another payload run.

@rvanderp3

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

/test verify-feature-promotion

1 similar comment
@rvanderp3

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

/test verify-feature-promotion

@openshift-merge-robotopenshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label May 19, 2025
@openshift-merge-robotopenshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label May 19, 2025
@rvanderp3

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

/test verify-feature-promotion

1 similar comment
@rvanderp3

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

/test verify-feature-promotion

@jcpowermac

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/lgtm

@rvanderp3

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.19-e2e-vsphere-ovn-multi-network

@openshift-ci

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@rvanderp3: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.19-e2e-vsphere-ovn-multi-network

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/75680010-35b8-11f0-9f48-0f9c13316b73-0

@openshift-ciopenshift-ciBot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 20, 2025
@rvanderp3

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@rvanderp3: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.19-e2e-vsphere-ovn-multi-network

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/75680010-35b8-11f0-9f48-0f9c13316b73-0

this will fail i think due to the installer PR not being merged, will re-run with the installer PR

@openshift-ci

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@rvanderp3: This PR was included in a payload test run from openshift/installer#9493
trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.19-e2e-vsphere-ovn-multi-network

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/98420110-35c4-11f0-8df4-88c6ccb4e831-0

@openshift-ci

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@JoelSpeed: This PR was included in a payload test run from openshift/installer#9493
trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.19-e2e-vsphere-ovn-multi-network

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/64c47730-360c-11f0-847e-38b7925135e2-0

@openshift-ci

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@rvanderp3: This PR was included in a payload test run from openshift/installer#9493
trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.19-e2e-vsphere-ovn-multi-network

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/666593b0-3672-11f0-9dab-85d17a321450-0

@JoelSpeed

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

vSphere testing shows success with the gate removed, LGTM

/lgtm
/retest-required

@openshift-ci

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jcpowermac, JoelSpeed, rvanderp3, WenXinWei

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ciopenshift-ciBot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 22, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 998cd53 and 2 for PR HEAD be5e7b0 in total

@rvanderp3

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

/retest-required

1 similar comment
@rvanderp3

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

/retest-required

@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 998cd53 and 2 for PR HEAD be5e7b0 in total

@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 3fa6799 and 1 for PR HEAD be5e7b0 in total

@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 3fa6799 and 2 for PR HEAD be5e7b0 in total

@openshift-ci

openshift-ciBot commented May 27, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@rvanderp3: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test nameCommitDetailsRequiredRerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-serial-techpreview562ea8alinktrue/test e2e-aws-serial-techpreview
ci/prow/e2e-aws-serial562ea8alinktrue/test e2e-aws-serial

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 3fa6799 and 2 for PR HEAD be5e7b0 in total

@openshift-merge-bot
openshift-merge-botBot merged commit f5e205b into openshift:masterMay 27, 2025
@openshift-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: ose-cluster-config-api
This PR has been included in build ose-cluster-config-api-container-v4.20.0-202505270944.p0.gf5e205b.assembly.stream.el9.
All builds following this will include this PR.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approvedIndicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files.lgtmIndicates that a PR is ready to be merged.size/SDenotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants

@rvanderp3@JoelSpeed@jcpowermac@WenXinWei@openshift-ci-robot@openshift-bot@everettraven@openshift-merge-robot