Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
CORS-3993: Promote GCPClusterHostedDNS to Default - #2300
Conversation
Hello @sadasu! Some important instructions when contributing to openshift/api: |
@sadasu: This pull request references CORS-3993 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set. DetailsIn response to this: Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
sadasu
commented
Apr 29, 2025
/jira refresh |
@sadasu: This pull request references CORS-3993 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
sadasu
commented
Apr 29, 2025
/jira refresh |
@sadasu: This pull request references CORS-3993 which is a valid jira issue. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
742fbce to
b385a03Compare0a623cf to
b2df60cCompareThis promotes GCP Cluster Hosted DNS feature from techpreview to available by default.
JoelSpeed
commented
Sep 8, 2025
@sadasu The custom DNS job that was set up to monitor this feature is currently only configured for 4.20 and only for tech preview. We will need to also have the job created for 4.21 and, then once this is merged, moved from tech preview to the stable feature set right? |
The 4.21 techpreview periodic job already exists. I have triggered some manual runs. |
gpei
commented
Sep 9, 2025
/verified later @gpei |
openshift-ci-robot
commented
Sep 9, 2025
@gpei: This PR has been marked to be verified later by DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
openshift-ci-robot
commented
Sep 9, 2025
1 similar comment
openshift-ci-robot
commented
Sep 9, 2025
gpei
commented
Sep 9, 2025
/retest-required |
gpei
commented
Sep 9, 2025
/test e2e-aws-ovn-hypershift |
openshift-ci-robot
commented
Sep 9, 2025
JoelSpeed
commented
Sep 9, 2025
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-serial-2of2 Commatrix failure is a known test harness issue /retest-required |
@JoelSpeed: Overrode contexts on behalf of JoelSpeed: ci/prow/e2e-aws-serial-2of2 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
openshift-ci-robot
commented
Sep 9, 2025
sadasu
commented
Sep 9, 2025
e2e-aws-ovn-hypershift* jobs are having a high failure rate but have nothing to do with this feature because of the current feature being on the GCP platform. Monitoring them closely to see if they are candidates to be overridden also. |
openshift-ci-robot
commented
Sep 9, 2025
sadasu
commented
Sep 9, 2025
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-serial-2of2 Based on comment #2300 (comment) |
@sadasu: sadasu unauthorized: /override is restricted to Repo administrators, approvers in top level OWNERS file, and the following github teams:openshift: openshift-release-oversight openshift-staff-engineers openshift-sustaining-engineers. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
openshift-ci-robot
commented
Sep 9, 2025
3 similar comments
openshift-ci-robot
commented
Sep 10, 2025
openshift-ci-robot
commented
Sep 10, 2025
openshift-ci-robot
commented
Sep 10, 2025
JoelSpeed
commented
Sep 10, 2025
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-hypershift This feature won't affect HCP or AWS, so I'm confident overriding these is going to be fine |
@JoelSpeed: Overrode contexts on behalf of JoelSpeed: ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-hypershift, ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-hypershift-conformance DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
openshift-ci-robot
commented
Sep 10, 2025
@sadasu: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
gpei
commented
Sep 11, 2025
/test e2e-aws-serial-2of2 |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Promotes GCP Cluster Hosted DNS feature from techpreview to available by default.