Skip to content

🐛 Set correct labels on helm release during upgrade - #1017

Merged
joelanford merged 1 commit into
operator-framework:mainfrom
kevinrizza:update-helm-labels
Jul 8, 2024
Merged

🐛 Set correct labels on helm release during upgrade#1017
joelanford merged 1 commit into
operator-framework:mainfrom
kevinrizza:update-helm-labels

Conversation

@kevinrizza

@kevinrizzakevinrizza commented Jul 8, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Write the correct label set to the helm release. This commit fixes an issue where the upgrades get wedged after the first upgrade when following legacy upgade semantics because the resolver relied on inaccurate version data in the helm release label

Resolves#1009

Description

Reviewer Checklist

  • API Go Documentation
  • Tests: Unit Tests (and E2E Tests, if appropriate)
  • Comprehensive Commit Messages
  • Links to related GitHub Issue(s)

Write the correct label set to the helm release. This commit fixes an issue
where the upgrades get wedged after the first upgrade when following
legacy upgade semantics because the resolver relied on inaccurate version
data in the helm release label
Signed-off-by: kevinrizza <krizza@redhat.com>
@kevinrizza
kevinrizza requested a review from a team as a code ownerJuly 8, 2024 17:29
@netlify

netlifyBot commented Jul 8, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Deploy Preview for olmv1 ready!

NameLink
🔨 Latest commit3434b9f
🔍 Latest deploy loghttps://app.netlify.com/sites/olmv1/deploys/668c21f63d776600071f5554
😎 Deploy Previewhttps://deploy-preview-1017--olmv1.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@codecov

codecovBot commented Jul 8, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 78.05%. Comparing base (5c83e91) to head (3434b9f).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1017 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 78.07% 78.05% -0.02% 
==========================================
Files 18 18 Lines 1254 1253 -1 ==========================================
- Hits 979 978 -1 
Misses 193 193 Partials 82 82 
FlagCoverage Δ
e2e56.65% <100.00%> (+0.10%)⬆️
unit53.47% <0.00%> (-0.28%)⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@joelanfordjoelanford changed the title Set correct labels on helm release during upgrade🐛 Set correct labels on helm release during upgradeJul 8, 2024
@joelanford
joelanford enabled auto-merge July 8, 2024 17:51
@joelanford
joelanford added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 8, 2024
Merged via the queue into operator-framework:main with commit 235e3d4Jul 8, 2024
perdasilva pushed a commit to LalatenduMohanty/operator-controller that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2024
…#1017)
Write the correct label set to the helm release. This commit fixes an issue
where the upgrades get wedged after the first upgrade when following
legacy upgade semantics because the resolver relied on inaccurate version
data in the helm release label
Signed-off-by: kevinrizza <krizza@redhat.com>
@skattojuskattoju mentioned this pull request Sep 25, 2024
4 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Resolution fails when manually upgrading through legacy replaces chain beyond n+1

2 participants

@kevinrizza@joelanford