Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I normally try to avoid running commands in
.zshrcbecause it can slow down creation of a new session significantly. Maybe it is not that big of a deal withbrew --prefixandfind, but I had this issue withnpm.If we can avoid this - that would be great. Here is my
.zshrc:Not sure if
coreutilsare necessary for OLMv1.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But we might still need to use
brew --prefix. I think it it is different on Intel and ARM Macs unfortunately.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've been doing this for quite awhile never encountered new session timing issues, though I appreciate the concern. The additional advantage of the approach is that if we identify we need additional tooling, sourcing the resource file will automagically pick it up.
npm is known for sometimes performing package maintenance at awkward times, and I definitely wouldn't want to include a function in shell resources which invoked it. I see no harm in a targeted path-walk though.
As far as I know we only need bash, gnu-tar, and gsed, unless you can think of a reason that we need coreutils...
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, it is not that bad. At least on my machine :)